Assessment of left ventricular volumes using multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT): phantom and human studies

PURPOSE: Multi-detector row CT (MDCT) is a new noninvasive modality for coronary artery imaging. Using the same MDCT data obtained for coronary artery assessment, left ventricular (LV) volumes such as end-diastolic (ED) and end-systolic (ES) volumes (EDV and ESV, respectively) and ejection fraction (EF) can potentially be assessed when ED and ES datasets are extracted. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of MDCT in the assessment of LV volumes. METHODS: Using a pulsating heart phantom (EDV = 143 ml, ESV = 107 ml, stroke volume = 36 ml, EF = 25%) and MDCT, EDV and ESV were measured and EF was calculated. Clinical materials consisted of 11 consecutive human subjects who underwent MDCT. MDCT data were acquired during a single breathhold, using an intravenous injection of contrast medium. Left ventriculography (LVG) was performed in all patients as a gold standard. LV-EF was calculated by measuring ESV and EDV in all patients. RESULTS: In the phantom study, LV volumes were: EDV = 137 ml, ESV = 101 ml, stroke volume = 36 ml, and EF = 26%. Close correlations were observed between MDCT values and LVG values (EDV: r = 0.95, ESV: r = 0.98, EF: r = 0.93, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: MDCT was useful for th e assessment of LV volumes and EF in various patients with CVD.     

Assessment of ECG-gated myocardial SPECT analysis program with cardiac phantom and clinical data]

PURPOSES: ECG-gated myocardial SPECT program (QGS) is coming into wide use. This program permits measurement of end-diastolic volume (EDV), and end-systolic volume (ESV) and ejection fraction (EF) by automatic detection of myocardial edges. We assessed the reproducibility, accuracy, factors that affect the measurement of these indices using a cardiac phantom and clinical data. METHODS: In the phantom study, we evaluated the effects of ventricular volume, location, absorption, acquisition time, enlarged acquisition and pre-filter on the calculated indices. In the clinical study using 99mTc-MIBI, reproducibility between 2 observers, comparison with left ventriculography and effects of pre-filter were assessed. In clinical cases of 201TI and 123I-BMIPP, left ventricular volume and EF were also analyzed by QGS with various pre-filters. RESULTS: Although the true phantom volumes (y) and calculated volumes (x) showed an excellent linear correlation (y = 0.94x - 13.8, r = 0.999), calculated volumes were significantly under-estimated by 14.5-33.8%. An absorbent material around the phantom caused reduction in calculated volumes by 4.1-9.1%. Duration of acquisition times, 3 to 60 seconds per projection, did not influence the calculation of the parameters. With enlarged data collection, calculated volume (37 ml) was larger than that of normal acquisition (33 ml). When the cut-off frequency of Butterworth filter was changed, these indices of volume and EF were almost stable over 0.41 cycle/cm. There was an excellent correlation in intra-observer measurements for EDV (r = 0.998, p < 0.0001), ESV (r = 0.998, p < 0.0001) and EF (r = 0.995, p < 0.0001). In comparison with left ventriculography, correlation of parameters was good in ESV (r = 0.91, p < 0.0001), EF (r = 0.88, p < 0.0001), but was fair in EDV (r = 0.78, p < 0.0001). The QGS program underestimated EDV, ESV and EF. CONCLUSION: QGS program with gated SPECT is useful to calculate relative volume and EF. However, to calculate absolute values, we should understand the various factors that affect the result of QGS.     

Evaluation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT versus cardiac MRI

It is stated that cardiac MRI imaging can provide accurate estimation of left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT for assessment of LV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV) and EF, using cardiac MRI as the reference methods/(methodology). Gated myocardial perfusion SPECT images were analyzed with two different quantification software, QGS and 4D-MSPECT. Thirty-four consecutive patients were studied. Myocardial perfusion SPECT and cardiac MRI had excellent intra/interobserver reproducibility. Correlation between the results of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT and cardiac MRI were high for EDV and EF. However, ESV and EDV were significantly underestimated by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT compared to cardiac MRI. Moreover, gated myocardial perfusion SPECT overestimated EF for small heart. One reason for the difference in volumes and EF is the delineation of the endocardial border. Cardiac MRI has higher spatial resolution. We should understand the differences of volumes and EF as determined by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT and cardiac MRI.     

Multicenter intercomparison assessment of consistency of left ventricular function from a gated cardiac SPECT phantom

Background  A multicenter intercomparison assessment was made of the variation in left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fractions (EFs) obtained from gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) of the 3-dimensional AGATE (Amsterdam gated) cardiac phantom. Methods and Results  The phantom was configured to produce 3 different standard end-systolic volume and end-diastolic volume combinations (50 mL and 120 mL, 90 mL and 160 mL, and 120 mL and 190 mL) with corresponding EF (58%, 44%, and 37%). Quantitative gated myocardial perfusion SPECT was performed with 39 SPECT systems in 35 departments. In the multicenter study, for all 3 filling conditions, a wide range of results was obtained. The EF was overestimated (by 1% to 15%), and both the end-systolic volume and end-diastolic volume were underestimated (by 1 to 65 mL). The extent of overestimation of EF was related to the extent of underestimation of the volumes and was independent of filling condition. The trend in error per center was comparable for all 3 filling conditions. Acquisition time per projection was the only independent predictor of the difference between measured and expected EF (P = .0001). Conclusions  Care should be taken before extrapolation of published and accepted cutoff values for LV EF and volumes in clinical decision making. Results should be validated in each center and monitored for accuracy and consistency over time.     

A realistic 3-D gated cardiac phantom for quality control of gated myocardial perfusion SPET: the Amsterdam gated (AGATE) cardiac phantom

A realistic 3-D gated cardiac phantom with known left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fractions (EFs) was produced to evaluate quantitative measurements obtained from gated myocardial single-photon emission tomography (SPET). The 3-D gated cardiac phantom was designed and constructed to fit into the Data Spectrum anthropomorphic torso phantom. Flexible silicone membranes form the inner and outer walls of the simulated left ventricle. Simulated LV volumes can be varied within the range 45–200 ml. The LV volume curve has a smooth and realistic clinical shape that is produced by a specially shaped cam connected to a piston. A fixed 70-ml stroke volume is applied for EF measurements. An ECG signal is produced at maximum LV filling by a controller unit connected to the pump. This gated cardiac phantom will be referred to as the Amsterdam 3-D gated cardiac phantom, or, in short, the AGATE cardiac phantom. SPET data were acquired with a triple-head SPET system. Data were reconstructed using filtered back-projection following pre-filtering and further processed with the Quantitative Gated SPECT (QGS) software to determine LV volume and EF values. Ungated studies were performed to measure LV volumes ranging from 45 ml to 200 ml. The QGS-determined LV volumes were systematically underestimated. For different LV combinations, the stroke volumes measured were consistent at 60–61 ml for 8-frame studies and 63–65 ml for 16-frame studies. QGS-determined EF values were slightly overestimated between 1.25% EF units for 8-frame studies and 3.25% EF units for 16-frame studies. In conclusion, the AGATE cardiac phantom offers possibilities for quality control, testing and validation of the whole gated cardiac SPET sequence, and testing of different acquisition and processing parameters and software.An erratum to this article can be found at     

Validation of left ventricular function from gated single photon computed emission tomography by using a scintillator-photodiode camera: a dynamic myocardial phantom study

A scintillator-photodiode camera is able to acquire single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images by using a rotating chair system. We validated the left ventricular (LV) parameters of this camera system utilizing a dynamic myocardial phantom. Gated myocardial SPECT of a dynamic myocardial phantom (Hokkaido University type; end diastolic volume (EDV), 143 ml; end systolic volume (ESV), 107 ml; ejection fraction (EF), 25%) was performed with this scintillation camera. LV parameters were calculated using pre-installed software (Mirage Myocardial Perfusion SPECT) (study 1) and the other software (QGS; Cedars-Sinai) (study 2). For comparison, SPECT from a traditional Anger camera were processed by the QGS software (study 3). The estimated volumes were similar among the three studies (EDV, 110+/-8 ml in study 1, 112+/-2 ml in study 2 and 111+/-1 ml in study 3; ESV, 86+/-8 ml in study 1, 93+/-4 ml in study 2 and 91+/-2 ml in study 3). The estimated EFs were 23+/-3%, 17+/-2%, and 18+/-1%, respectively. The calculated volume within each study was underestimated by approximately the same degree. However, each estimated EF value for each study was close to the actual value. The estimated LV function using the scintillator-photodiode camera system may be considered as a suitable alternative to the traditional Anger camera system.     

Assessment of left ventricular function by thallium-201 quantitative gated cardiac SPECT

PURPOSE: Present study was designed to evaluate the accuracy of the measurement of left ventricular volume by quantitative gated SPECT (QGS) software using 201T1 and the effect of cutoff frequency of Butterworth prereconstruction filter on the calculation of volume. METHODS: The RH-2 type cardiac phantom and 20 patients with ischemic heart disease were studied. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV) and ejection fraction (EF) were calculated by the QGS software using the various frequency of Butterworth filter. These parameters were evaluated by Simpson's method using left ventriculography (LVG). RESULTS: The volume of the phantom calculated by QGS was under-estimated by 14%. In the clinical study, EDV and ESV measured by QGS were smaller than those obtained from LVG by 10%. When the cutoff frequency of Butterworth filter was 0.43 cycles/cm, the values measured by QGS were best correlated with those by LVG (EDV: r = 0.80, p < 0.001; ESV: r = 0.86, p < 0.001; EF: r = 0.80, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that 201Tl quantitative gated cardiac SPECT can estimate myocardial ischemia and left ventricular function simultaneously.     

Stereological estimation of left-ventricular volumetric and functional parameters from multidetector-row computed tomography data

This study aims to optimize the stereological method for estimating left-ventricular (LV) parameters from retrospectively electrocardiography-gated 16-row MDCT and to compare stereological estimations with those by MRI. MDCT was performed in 17 consecutive patients with known or suspected coronary disease. Stereological measurements based on point counting were optimized by determining the appropriate distance between grid points. LV parameters were evaluated by standard CT analysis using a semi-automatic segmentation method. Two independent observers evaluated the reproducibility of the stereological method. End-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV) estimations with a coefficient of error below 5% were obtained in a mean time of 2.3 +/- 0.5 min with a point spacing of 25 and 15 pixels, respectively. The intra- and interobserver variability for estimating LV parameters was 2.6-4.4 and 4.9-8.2%, respectively. MRI estimations were highly correlated with those by standard CT analysis (R > 0.82) and stereology (R > 0.84). Stereological method significantly overestimated EDV and ESV compared to MRI (EDV: P = 0.0011; ESV: P = 0.0013), whereas for stroke volume (SV) and ejection fraction (EF), no difference was observed (P > 0.05). For standard CT analysis and MRI, significant differences were found except for SV and EF (EDV: P = 0.0008; ESV: P = 0.0004; EF: P = 0.051; SV: P = 0.064). The time-efficient optimized stereological method enables the reproducible evaluation of LV function from MDCT.     

Reproducibility of Tl-201 and Tc-99m sestamibi gated myocardial perfusion SPECT measurement of myocardial function

BACKGROUND: We compared the reproducibility of thallium 201 and technetium 99m sestamibi (MIBI) gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) measurement of myocardial function using the Germano algorithm (J Nucl Med 1995;36:2138-47). METHODS AND RESULTS: Gated SPECT acquisition was repeated in the same position in 30 patients who received Tl-201 and in 26 who received Tc-99m-MIBI. The quantification of end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and ejection fraction (EF) on Tl-201 and Tc-99m-MIBI gated SPECT was processed independently with Cedars-Sinai QGS (Quantitative Gated SPECT) software. The reproducibility of the measurement of ventricular function on Tl-201 gated SPECT was compared with that of Tc-99m-MIBI gated SPECT. Correlation between the 2 measurements for volumes and EF was excellent for the repeated gated SPECT studies of Tl-201 (r = 0.928 to 0.986, P <.05) and Tc-99m-MIBI (r = 0.979 to 0.997, P <.05). However, Bland-Altman analysis revealed the 95% limits of agreement (2 SDs) for volumes and EF were narrower by repeated Tc-99m-MIBI gated SPECT (EDV 14.1 mL, ESV 9.4 mL, EF 5.5%) than by repeated Tl-201 gated SPECT (EDV 24.1 mL, ESV 18.6 mL, EF 10.3%). The root-mean-square values of the coefficient of variation for volumes and EF were smaller by repeated Tc-99m-MIBI gated SPECT (EDV 2.1 mL, ESV 2.7 mL, EF 2.3%) than by repeated Tl-201 gated SPECT (EDV 3.2 mL, ESV 3.5 mL, EF 5.2%). CONCLUSIONS: QGS provides an excellent correlation between repeated gated SPECT with Tl-201 and Tc-99m-MIBI. However, Tc-99m-MIBI provides more reproducible volumes and EF than Tl-201. Tc-99m-MIBI gated SPECT is the preferable method for the clinical monitoring of ventricular function.     

Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm: comparison with echocardiography, SPECT, and MR imaging

PURPOSE: To evaluate accuracy of cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) and segmental reconstruction algorithm over a range of heart rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained. Informed consent was not required. Multi-detector row CT (500-msec rotation time, 8 x 1-mm detector collimation) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging were performed in 50 patients (28 men, 22 women; age range, 46-84 years; mean age, 67 years). Two-dimensional echocardiography was performed in 41 patients, and electrocardiographically (ECG)-gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) was performed in 27. End-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), ejection fraction (EF), and left ventricular (LV) mass were estimated with multi-detector row CT and compared with values estimated with MR imaging, which served as the reference standard. Additionally, EF values estimated with multi-detector row CT, echocardiography, and SPECT were compared with those estimated with MR imaging. Systemic error and degree of agreement of global functional parameters measured with MR imaging and other modalities were assessed. In a second analysis, linear regression analysis was added. RESULTS: EF estimated with multi-detector row CT agreed and correlated well with EF estimated with MR imaging (bias +/- standard deviation, -1.2% +/- 4.6; r = 0.96). Agreement and correlation were similar for EDV (-0.35 mL +/- 15.2; r = 0.97), ESV (1.1 mL +/- 8.6; r = 0.99), and LV mass (2.5 mL +/- 15.0; r = 0.96). Standard deviation of EF difference between multi-detector row CT and MR imaging was significantly less than that between echocardiography and MR imaging (P < .001) or that between SPECT and MR imaging (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Various LV functional parameters were measured with multi-detector row CT with a segmental approach, and measurements correlated and agreed with those obtained with MR imaging. Moreover, functional analysis with multi-detector row CT was more accurate than that with two-dimensional echocardiography or ECG-gated SPECT.     

Comparison between ECTb and QGS for assessment of left ventricular function from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT

BACKGROUND: The most widely distributed software packages to compute left ventricular (LV) volume and ejection fraction (EF) from gated perfusion tomograms are QGS and the Emory Cardiac Toolbox (ECTb). Because LV modeling and time sampling differ between the algorithms, it is necessary to document relationships between values produced by them and to establish normal limits individually for each software package in order to interpret results obtained for individual patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Gated single photon emission computed tomography technetium 99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion studies were collected and analyzed for 246 patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. QGS and ECTb values of ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic volume (EDV), and end-systolic volume were found to correlate linearly (r = 0.90, 0.91, and 0.94, respectively), but EF and EDV were significantly lower for QGS than with ECTb (53% +/- 13% vs 61% +/- 13 and 102 +/- 45 mL vs 114 +/- 50 mL, respectively). To compare calculations for healthy subjects between the two software packages, data were also selected for 50 other patients at low likelihood for coronary artery disease, for whom EF and EDV were significantly lower for QGS compared with ECTb (62% +/- 9% vs 67% +/- 8% and 84 +/- 26 mL vs 105 +/- 33 mL, respectively). The ECTb lower limit was 51% for EF and the upper limits were 171 mL for EDV and 59 mL/m(2) for mass-indexed EDV, compared with limits of 44%, 137 mL, and 47 mL/m(2) for QGS. CONCLUSIONS: Although correlations were strong between the two methods of computing LV functional values, statistical scatter was substantial and significant biases and trends observed. Therefore, when both software packages are used at the same site, it will be important to take these differences into consideration and to apply normal limits specific to each set of algorithms.     

Improved quantification of small hearts for gated myocardial perfusion imaging

Purpose

In patients with a small heart, defined as an end-systolic volume (ESV) of ≤20 mL calculated using the Quantitative Gated SPECT (QGS) program, underestimation of ESV and overestimation of ejection fraction (EF) using gated myocardial perfusion imaging are considered errors caused by inappropriate delineation of the left ventricle (LV). The aim of this study was to develop a new method for delineation of the LV and to evaluate it in studies using a digital phantom, normal subjects and patients.

Methods

The active shape-based method for LV delineation, EXINI heart (ExH), was adjusted to more accurately process small hearts. In small hearts, due to the partial volume effect and the short distance to the opposite ventricular wall, the endocardial and the epicardial surfaces are shifted in the epicardial direction depending on the midventricular volume. The adjusted method was evaluated using digital XCAT phantoms with Monte Carlo simulation (8 virtual patients), a Japanese multicentre normal database (69 patients) and consecutive Japanese patients (116 patients). The LV volumes, EF and diastolic parameters derived from ExH and QGS were compared.

Results

The digital phantom studies showed a mean ESV of 87 %?±?9 % of the true volume calculated using ExH and 22 %?±?18 % calculated using QGS. In the normal database, QGS gave higher EFs in women than in men (71.4?±?6.0 % vs. 67.2?±?6.0 %, p?=?0.0058), but ExH gave comparable EFs (70.7?±?4.9 % and 71.4?±?5 % in men and women, respectively, p?=?ns). QGS gave higher EFs in subjects with a small heart than in those with a normal-sized heart (74.5?±?5.1 % vs. 66.1?±?4.9 %), but ExH gave comparable values (70.0?±?5.9 % vs. 71.6?±?4.2 %, respectively, p?=?ns). In consecutive patients, the average EFs with QGS in patients with ESV >20 mL, 11–20 mL and ≤10 mL were 57.9 %, 71.9 % and 83.2 %, but with ExH the differences among these groups were smaller (65.2 %, 67.8 % and 71.5 %, respectively).

Conclusion

The volume-dependent edge correction algorithm was able to effectively reduce the effects on ESV and EF of a small heart. The uniform normal values might be applicable to both men and women and to both small and normal-sized hearts.     

Measurement of cardiac ventricular volumes using multidetector row computed tomography: comparison of two- and three-dimensional methods

This study compared a three-dimensional volumetric threshold-based method to a two-dimensional Simpson’s rule based short-axis multiplanar method for measuring right (RV) and left ventricular (LV) volumes, stroke volumes, and ejection fraction using electrocardiography-gated multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) data sets. End-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV) of RV and LV were measured independently and blindly by two observers from contrast-enhanced MDCT images using commercial software in 18 patients. For RV and LV the three-dimensionally calculated EDV and ESV values were smaller than those provided by two-dimensional short axis (10%, 5%, 15% and 26% differences respectively). Agreement between the two methods was found for LV (EDV/ESV: r=0.974/0.910, ICC=0.905/0.890) but not for RV (r=0.882/0.930, ICC=0.663/0.544). Measurement errors were significant only for EDV of LV using the two-dimensional method. Similar reproducibility was found for LV measurements, but the three-dimensional method provided greater reproducibility for RV measurements than the two-dimensional. The threshold value supported three-dimensional method provides reproducible cardiac ventricular volume measurements, comparable to those obtained using the short-axis Simpson based method.     

Measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by quantitative gated SPET,contrast ventriculography and magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis

All previous validation studies of quantitative gated single-photon emission tomography (QGS) have examined relatively few patients, and the accuracy of QGS thus remains uncertain. We performed a meta-analysis of data from 301 participants in ten studies that compared QGS using technetium-99m-labelled tracers with contrast left ventriculography (LVG), and from 112 participants in six studies that compared QGS with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Linear regression and Bland-Altman analyses were used to evaluate pooled data from individuals across the studies. The correlation between QGS and LVG for end-diastolic volume (EDV) (r=0.81, SEE=27 ml), end-systolic volume (ESV) (r=0.83, SEE=18 ml) and ejection fraction (EF) (r=0.79, SEE=8.3%) was good, as was that between QGS and MRI for EDV (r=0.87, SEE=34 ml), ESV (r=0.89, SEE=27 ml) and EF (r=0.88, SEE=7.2%). However, Bland-Altman plots indicated that LVG minus QGS differences for EDV generated a systematic and random error of 32+/-58 ml (mean+/-2SD), and that MRI minus QGS generated an error of 13+/-73 ml. In the subgroup of patients in whom ECG gating was set at eight intervals, QGS significantly underestimated EF by 7.6%+/-17.4% (mean+/-2SD) compared with LVG and by 6.3%+/-14.6% compared with MRI; no such underestimation was observed in the subgroup in whom ECG gating was set at 16 intervals. We conclude that in patients with ECG gating set at eight intervals, QGS systematically underestimates LV volumes and EF compared with both LVG and MRI. Since QGS also shows considerable variations around the systematic deviations, there remains uncertainty over whether an individual value determined with QGS approximates the true LV volumes and EF.     

Left ventricular systolic/diastolic function evaluated by quantitative ECG-gated SPECT: comparison with echocardiography and plasma BNP analysis

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the left ventricular (LV) functional parameters calculated using quantitative electrocardiography (ECG)-gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (QGS). In addition to LV systolic parameters, diastolic parameters were compared with those by ultrasound echocardiography (UCG) and also with plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentrations. METHODS: We examined 46 patients with various forms of heart disease. By the QGS data with 16 framing data acquisition using technetium (Tc)-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile (MIBI) perfusion, we calculated the following parameters: LV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), ejection fraction (EF), peak filling rate (PFR), filling rate during the first third of the filling time (1/3FR) and first third filling fraction (1/3FF). By UCG, we measured mitral early to atrial (E/A) wave velocity ratio and pulmonary venous inflow systolic/diastolic (S/D) ratio as diastolic functional parameters. Plasma BNP concentrations were also measured. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between LVEDV, ESV and EF measured by QGS and UCG (EDV, r = 0.71, p < 0.001; ESV, r = 0.82, p < 0.001; EF, r = 0.75, p < 0.001). The PFR, 1/3FR and 1/3FF obtained by QGS correlated positively with E/A ratio (PFR, r = 0.54, p < 0.001; 1/3FR, r = 0.61, p < 0.001; 1/3FF, r = 0.42, p < 0.01) and negatively with S/D ratio (PFR, r = -0.40, p < 0.01; 1/3FR, r = -0.38, p < 0.05; 1/3FF, r = -0.39, p < 0.01) obtained by UCG. Plasma BNP concentrations in EF < 50% patients were greater than those in EF > or = 50% patients (335.2 +/- 60.2 vs. 101.2 +/- 41.3 pg/ml, p < 0.01, both n = 17). Plasma BNP levels were also compared between higher and lower 1/3FF patients matched for LVEF. Plasma BNP concentrations in 1/3FF < 35% patients were significantly greater than those in 1/3FF > or = 35% patients (312.9 +/- 62.5 vs. 120.5 +/- 32.8 pg/ml, p < 0.05, both n = 14). CONCLUSIONS: The degree of LV systolic and diastolic dysfunctions evaluated by QGS correlated with that by UCG or BNP. The QGS functional parameters offer useful information regarding cardiac failure.     

Comparative study of quantitative blood pool SPECT imaging with 180° and 360° acquisition orbits on accuracy of cardiac function

BACKGROUND: Quantitative blood pool single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) (QBS) can measure ejection fraction (EF) and volumes from gated blood pool single photon emission tomography (GBPS) working in fully automatic mode in 3-dimensional space. The effects of 180 degrees and 360 degrees data acquisition in GBPS have not been fully evaluated. This study compares the accuracy of 360 degrees and 180 degrees data acquisition for left ventricular (LV) systolic function in a clinical study and measures LV volume by GBPS compared with ultrasound echocardiography. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population comprised 9 normal volunteers and 34 patients. GBPS data were acquired by use of 360 degrees rotation and 60 stops per head. All 60 (360 degrees ) and 30 (45 degrees right anterior oblique to 45 degrees left posterior oblique) pieces of projection data that were selected for reconstructing the 180 degrees data were reconstructed and both ventricular functional parameters were automatically obtained by QBS software. The contour of the LV septal wall was concave in 6 patients (14%) when processed at 180 degrees , whereas a concave septum at 360 degrees processing was observed in only 1 patient (2%). The coefficients of correlation between 180 degrees and 360 degrees were 0.467 for the end-diastolic volume (EDV) and 0.648 for the end-systolic volume (ESV). The mean 180 degrees EDV value (152.9 +/- 46.1 mL) was significantly smaller than that of the 360 degrees EDV (191 +/- 70.8 mL) ( P < .001). However, there was no significant difference between the 360 degrees EDV (0.623) and 180 degrees EDV (0.407) as compared by echocardiography ( P = .218). The agreement of the EF between both methods was close ( r = 0.894, P < .0001). The agreement of the right ventricular volumes between the 180 degrees and 360 degrees orbits was close ( r = 0.800 for EDV and 0.706 for ESV). The EF was relatively dispersed between the 180 degrees and 360 degrees methods ( r = 0.642). CONCLUSION: This study showed that SPECT image acquisition by use of both the 180 degrees method and the 360 degrees method considerably underestimated LV volume quantification. In addition, the LV volume with the 180 degrees method was significantly smaller than that with the 360 degrees method. Thus a 360 degrees acquisition orbit may be suitable for more quantitatively accurate results when blood pool imaging is performed with gated SPECT.     

Evaluation of cardiac function with 32DAS MDCT--fundamental examination

Cardiac images were taken in altered pulse counts on a pulsating cardiac phantom, revolving speed of X-ray tube, image reconstructing mode, and beam pitch with 32 DAS MDCT. The objective of this study was to determine whether conditions of image taking affect calculated values of ejection fraction (EF). Moreover, the EF values measured by left ventriculography (LVG) and by coronary computed tomography (CT) were compared using clinical data of 4 patients who underwent both coronary CT and LVG. On evaluating the pulsating cardiac phantom images, the EF values measured by coronary CT were generally smaller than those measured by LVG. On evaluation of the pulsating cardiac phantom images, the values of end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV) measured by coronary CT were smaller than those measured by LVG. On the contrary, the EF values measured by coronary CT were bigger than those measured by LVG. The maximal difference between the EF values measured by LVG and those measured by coronary CT was approximately 10% based upon the values measured by LVG.     

Assessment of Left Ventricular Function and Volume in Patients Undergoing 128-Slice Coronary CT Angiography with ECG-Based Maximum Tube Current Modulation: a Comparison with Echocardiography

Objective

To compare multi-detector CT (MDCT) using 128-slice coronary CT angiography (Definition AS+, Siemens Medical Solution, Forchheim, Germany) with ECG-based maximum tube current modulation with echocardiography for the determination of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), as well as assessing coronary artery image quality and patient radiation dose.

Materials and Methods

Thirty consecutive patients (M:F = 20:10; mean age, 57.9 ± 11.4 years) were referred for MDCT for evaluation of atypical chest pain. EF, EDV and ESV were determined for both MDCT and echocardiography, and the correlation coefficients were assessed. Coronary artery segment subjective image quality (1, excellent; 4, poor) and radiation dose were recorded.

Results

Left ventricular EF, EDV, and ESV were calculated by MDCT and echocardiography and the comparison showed a significant correlation with those estimated by echocardiography (p < 0.05). Consistently, the LVEFs calculated by MDCT and echocardiography were not statistically different. However, LV, EDV and ESV from MDCT were statistically higher than those from echocardiography (p < 0.05). The average image quality score of the coronary artery segment was 1.10 and the mean patient radiation dose was 3.99 ± 1.85 mSv.

Conclusion

Although LV volume was overestimated by MDCT, MDCT provides comparable results to echocardiography for LVEF and LVV, with a low radiation dose.     

Left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction calculated from quantitative electrocardiographic-gated 99mTc-tetrofosmin myocardial SPECT.

We compared the left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV) and ejection fraction (LVEF) as calculated by Cedars automated quantitative gated SPECT (QGS) to those determined by first-pass radionuclide angiography (FPRNA) and contrast left ventriculography (LVG) in a group of 21 patients (mean age 61.4 +/- 9.2 y). METHODS: A total of 740 MBq 99mTc-tetrofosmin was administered rapidly into the right cubital vein at rest, and FPRNA was performed using a multicrystal gamma camera. One hour after injection, QGS was performed with a temporal resolution of 10 frames per R-R interval. LVG was performed within 2 wk. RESULTS: The EDV, ESV and LVEF calculated by QGS were highly reproducible (intraobserver, r = 0.99, r = 0.99 and r = 0.99, respectively; interobserver, r = 0.99, r = 0.99 and r = 0.99, respectively; P < 0.01) and were more consistent than those determined by FPRNA (intraobserver, r = 0.97, r = 0.95 and r = 0.93, respectively; interobserver, r = 0.86, r = 0.96 and r = 0.91, respectively; P < 0.01). There was a good correlation between EDV, ESV and LVEF by FPRNA and those by LVG (r = 0.61, r = 0.72 and r = 0.91, respectively; P < 0.01), and there was an excellent correlation between QGS and LVG (r = 0.73, r = 0.83 and r = 0.87, respectively; P < 0.01). The mean EDV by QGS (100 +/- 11.3 mL) was significantly lower than by FPRNA (132 +/- 16.8 mL) or LVG (130 +/- 8.1 mL), and the mean ESV by QGS (53.8 +/- 9.3 mL) was lower than by FPRNA (73.0 +/- 13.3 mL). Ejection fraction values were highest by LVG (57.1% +/- 3.2%), then QGS (51.8% +/- 3.0%) and FPRNA (48.9% +/- 2.4%). CONCLUSION: QGS gave more reproducible results than FPRNA. LV volumes and LVEF calculated by QGS correlated well to those by LVG.     

Abnormal response to inotropic stimulation in young asymptomatic type I diabetic patients demonstrated by serial gated myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging

Purpose In subjects without underlying cardiac disease dobutamine is known to enhance systolic LV function and LV relaxation. As end-systolic (ES) and end-diastolic (ED) volumes (V) can be derived from gated SPECT we intent to study these volumes and their response to dobutamine in order to have a better understanding of the mechanism by which stroke volume (SV) increases during dobutamine infusion. We intent to do this in normal controls and in young diabetic subjects.Methods After injection of sestamibi, serial gated SPECT were obtained at baseline, and during low doses of dobutamine infusion in 12 asymptomatic type I diabetic patients, and in 12 age matched controls. LV EDV, ESV, SV and EF were calculated with the QGS program.Results Gated SPECT showed comparable LV EF and SV in both groups at rest. There was a significant increase in LVEF and SV during dobutamine infusion but in the diabetic patients the increase in SV was due to a decrease in ESV from 25±5 to 20±6 ml/m2 (p=0.002) and no change in EDV. In normal controls, the increase in EF was due to an increase in EDV from 69±10 to 73±12 ml/m2 (p=0.002) with no significant change in ESV.Conclusion These data confirm the presence of subclinical abnormalities of diastolic function in asymptomatic type I diabetic patients and show differences in adaptation to inotropic stimulation in order to preserve the increase in stroke volume and LV ejection fraction.