A phase I trial of gemcitabine and infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with refractory solid tumors: Louisiana Oncology Associates protocol no. 1 (LOA-1)

The major purposes of this study were to determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), toxicity profile, and antitumor activity of gemcitabine (GEM) (Gemzar) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combination therapy when administered to patients with advanced solid tumors. GEM was administered intravenously over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15, and 5-FU was administered as a continuous intravenous infusion from day 1 through day 15 of each 28-day treatment course. Seventeen patients (13 men and 4 women, median age 57, all previously treated with chemotherapy) were treated with 68 courses at 3 dose levels: 800/200, 1,000/200, and 1,000/300 [GEM (mg/m2/week)/ 5-FU (mg/m2/day)]. Two further patients were not fully evaluable for toxicity; one died from a probable pulmonary embolism, and one refused further treatment after developing grade II mucositis and dermatitis after her day 1 to 7 treatment. At the third dose level, 2 of 4 patients developed grade III mucositis; one also developed grade IV neutropenia with fever and grade III thrombocytopenia. Patient accrual then resumed at the second dose level. At this level, 10 patients were treated, with two developing grade III mucositis. One of these patients also developed grade IV dermatitis. No other patient developed grade III or IV side effects. Prophylactic dexamethasone was initiated after 4 of the first 7 patients (including 1 of the not fully evaluable patients) developed dermatitis-grade IV in 1 patient and grade II in the remaining 3 patients. After the steroids were initiated, 4 of the last 11 patients treated developed dermatitis, but grade 1 in all cases. One patient with metastatic gastric cancer achieved a near-complete response of his gastric mass and adrenal metastasis. Minor responses were achieved in a patient with colon carcinoma and a patient with an ethmoid sinus adenoid cystic carcinoma. The MTD and recommended dose for phase II clinical trials of GEM and 5-FU on the above schedule is 1,000 mg/m2 and 200 mg/m2 respectively, with mucositis as the DLT.     

A parallel dose-escalation study of weekly and twice-weekly bortezomib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To establish maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and tolerability of two schedules of bortezomib in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine as first-line treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients were assigned to increasing doses of bortezomib days 1 and 8 (weekly schedule) or days 1, 4, 8, and 11 (twice-weekly schedule), in addition to gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) day 1, every 21 days. Maximum of six cycles. Plasma pharmacokinetics of cisplatin and gemcitabine were determined at MTD. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled of whom 27 had non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Diarrhea, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were dose-limiting toxicities leading to an MTD of bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) in the weekly schedule. Febrile neutropenia and thrombocytopenia with bleeding were dose-limiting toxicities in the twice-weekly schedule, leading to an MTD of bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) as well. Most common > or =grade 3 treatment-related toxicities were thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. No grade > or =3 treatment-related sensory neuropathy was reported. Of 34 evaluable patients, 13 achieved partial responses, 17 stable disease, and 4 progressive disease. Response and survival of NSCLC patients treated with twice weekly or weekly bortezomib were similar. However, increased dose intensity of bortezomib led to increased gastrointestinal toxicity as well as myelosuppression. Pharmacokinetic profiles of cisplatin and gemcitabine were not significantly different in patients receiving either schedule. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) is the recommended phase 2 schedule, constituting a safe combination, with activity in NSCLC.     

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Phase I trial of protracted venous infusion fluorouracil plus weekly gemcitabine with concurrent radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced pancreas cancer: a regimen with unexpected early toxicity.

PURPOSE: We performed a phase I trial of protracted venous infusion (PVI) fluorouracil (5-FU) plus weekly gemcitabine with concurrent radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced pancreas cancer to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of gemcitabine that could be safely administered. We also sought to identify the toxicities associated with this treatment protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seven patients with locally advanced pancreas cancer were treated with planned doses of radiation (59.4 Gy) and PVI of 5-FU (200 mg/m(2)/d) with gemcitabine doses of 50 to 100 mg/m(2)/wk. RESULTS: Two of three patients at the 100-mg/m(2)/wk dose level experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), as did three of four at the 50-mg/m(2)/wk dose level. One patient experienced a mucocutaneous reaction described as a Stevens-Johnson syndrome that was attributed to chemotherapy. Three patients developed gastric or duodenal ulcers with severe bleeding requiring transfusion. One patient developed severe thrombocytopenia lasting longer than 4 weeks. Three of the five episodes of DLT developed at radiation doses < or = 36 Gy. CONCLUSION: Based on this experience, we cannot recommend further investigation of regimens incorporating gemcitabine into regimens of radiation with PVI 5-FU. The mechanism of this synergistic toxicity remains to be determined.     

Phase I trial of gemcitabine,administered as a standard and constant dose-rate infusion,in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors (LOA-2)

The major purposes of this study were to determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), toxicity profile, and antitumor activity of gemcitabine and paclitaxel combination therapy when administered to patients with advanced solid tumors, using two infusion schedules of each agent. Paclitaxel was administered on day 1, followed by gemcitabine, and gemcitabine alone was administered on day 8, of each 21-day treatment course. In the initial phase of the trial, paclitaxel was administered during 3 hours and gemcitabine during 30 minutes (schedule A). After the MTD was determined on this schedule, patients were then treated with paclitaxel during 1 hour and gemcitabine at a fixed dose-rate of 10 mg/m(2)/min (schedule B). Forty-six patients were treated with 176 courses at 7 dose levels. The MTD for schedule A was 1,300 mg/m(2) and 200 mg/m(2) and for schedule B was 1,000 mg/m(2) and 200 mg/m(2) for gemcitabine and paclitaxel, respectively. The DLT for schedule A was neutropenia and for schedule B was neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Nonhematologic toxicity was relatively mild. Gemcitabine and paclitaxel, using both schedules of administration in the current trial, is a promising chemotherapeutic regimen.     

An EORTC-IDBBC phase I study of gemcitabine and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil in patients with metastatic breast cancer resistant to anthracyclines or pre-treated with both anthracyclines and taxanes

The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and potential activity of combined gemcitabine and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients that are resistant to anthracyclines or have been pretreated with both anthracyclines and taxanes. 15 patients with MBC were studied at three European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer centres. 13 patients had received both anthracylines and taxanes. Gemcitabine was given intravenously (i.v.) on days 1 and 8, and 5-FU as a continuous i.v. infusion on days 1 through to 14, both drugs given in a 21-day schedule at four different dose levels. Both were given at doses commonly used for the single agents for the last dose level (dose level 4). One of 6 patients at level 4 (gemcitabine 1200 mg/m2 and 5-FU 250 mg/m2/day) had a DLT, a grade 3 stomatitis and skin toxicity. One DLT, a grade 3 transaminase rise and thrombosis, occurred in a patient at level 2 (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and 5-FU 200 mg/m2/day). Thus, the MTD was not reached. One partial response and four disease stabilisations were observed. Only 1 patient withdrew from the treatment due to toxicity. The MTD was not reached in the phase I study. The combination of gemcitabine and 5-FU is well tolerated at doses up to 1200 mg/m2 given on days 1 and 8 and 250 mg/m2/day given on days 1 through to 14, respectively, every 21 days. The clinical benefit rate (responses plus no change of at least 6 months) was 33% with one partial response, suggesting that MBC patients with prior anthracycline and taxane therapy may derive significant benefit from this combination with minimal toxicity.     

A phase I study of the trinuclear platinum compound,BBR 3464, in combination with protracted venous infusional 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced cancer

Purpose BBR 3464 is a novel trinuclear platinum anticancer agent with a broad spectrum of preclinical antitumour activity. A phase I, open-label dose-escalating study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of BBR 3464 administered in combination with protracted venous infusional (PVI) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for up to six courses in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic cancer.Methods Dose escalation was based on observation of toxicity at each dose level. BBR 3464 (0.6 mg/m² escalated to 0.75 mg/m²) was studied in combination with PVI 5-FU (200 mg/m² per day).Results Entered into the study were 14 patients. The most frequent toxicities were nausea, neutropenia, fatigue and diarrhoea. The protocol-defined MTD was not determined as 11/14 patients experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia that interrupted the planned administration of PVI 5-FU on day 15 (of 21). Although these events were not dose-limiting, as defined in the protocol, they imposed limitations on the dose of PVI 5-FU administered. Antitumour activity was observed: a partial response in one patient (7%) with invasive breast cancer. Stable disease was confirmed in three patients (21%). These four patients all completed the planned six courses of combined therapy.Conclusions In light of the lack of septic events associated with the recorded neutropenia, it may be possible to safely continue PVI 5-FU despite the grade 3 or 4 neutropenia or modify the PVI schedule and administer therapy on days 1–15 of the 21-day cycle, but these modifications were not considered in this study.     

Phase I chemotherapy study of biochemical modulation of folinic acid and fluorouracil by gemcitabine in patients with solid tumor malignancies.

PURPOSE: This phase I biochemical modulation study evaluated the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity, and effectiveness of the combination of folinic acid (FA)/fluorouracil (5-FU) followed by escalated dose levels of gemcitabine (FFG) in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were refractory to primary treatment and/or without effective treatment options. Twenty-eight patients received an intravenous (IV) infusion of FA 100 mg/m(2) over 1 hour and a 5-FU 450 mg/m(2) IV bolus in the middle of the FA infusion. After the FA infusion, gemcitabine was administered at a steady rate of infusion of 10 mg/m(2)/min over initially 30 minutes and with increases of an additional 15 minutes at each given level. One cycle consisted of six weekly treatments followed by a 2-week rest. RESULTS: The MTD of gemcitabine was established at 900 mg/m(2) given over 90 minutes. Eight patients of 21 with metastatic colorectal cancer achieved responses (one complete response; seven partial responses), for a response rate of 38%. Responses were seen across the gemcitabine doses of 300 to 900 mg/m(2). One patient had prior treatment with FA/5-FU for advanced disease. Patients with colorectal carcinoma had a median survival of 18 months, and the patient with lung carcinoma has been alive for 24+ months. CONCLUSION: The combination chemotherapy of FFG was well tolerated and may benefit patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. A phase II evaluation in this patient population is in progress.     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of two sequences of gemcitabine and docetaxel administered weekly to patients with advanced cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and effect of drug sequence on toxicities and pharmacokinetics of the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel. METHODS: A total of 34 patients with advanced cancers were treated with gemcitabine and docetaxel on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle according to the following dose escalation schedule: level 1, 800 and 30 mg/m2, respectively; level 2, 800 and 40 mg/m2; level 3, 1,000 and 40 mg/m2; and level 4, 1,250 and 40 mg/m2. At each dose level, at least three patients were assigned to one of the two sequences of drug administration: gemcitabine-->docetaxel or docetaxel-->gemcitabine. Once the MTD had been reached, six additional patients, who had received no more than one chemotherapy regimen, were enrolled to dose levels 3 and 4 (gemcitabine-->docetaxel) to determine the MTD in minimally pretreated patients. RESULTS: Neutropenia was the most frequent DLT with an overall incidence of 23.5%. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 62% of patients (8/13) who had received two or more prior chemotherapy regimens, but not at all (0/15) in patients who had received no more than one prior chemotherapy regimens (P< 0.001). Additional DLTs included grade 4 diarrhea and grade 4 stomatitis in one patient each. The MTD was determined to be gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 and docetaxel 40 mg/m2 in patients who had received two or more prior chemotherapy regimens. However, minimally pretreated patients (no more than one prior chemotherapy regimen) were able to tolerate higher doses with an MTD of gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 and docetaxel 40 mg/m2. There were no significant differences in toxicities or pharmacokinetics between the two sequences of administration. Partial and minor responses were observed in 23.5% of patients: non-small-cell lung (two of eight), gastric (two of three), head and neck (one of two), bladder (two of four) and hepatocellular cancer (one of one). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel administered on days 1 and 8 every 21 days was feasible and well tolerated in patients with advanced malignancies. The sequence of administration had no significant effect on the toxicity or pharmacokinetics of either drug. Minimally pretreated patients tolerated higher doses of this combination without significant toxicities. This schedule and combination demonstrated activity in a variety of solid tumors, and merits further evaluation.     

Phase III study of gemcitabine in combination with fluorouracil versus gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial E2297.

PURPOSE: Gemcitabine is generally considered to constitute first-line therapy for pancreatic cancer. To determine whether the addition of fluorouracil (5-FU) improves on the results from single-agent gemcitabine, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) compared gemcitabine plus bolus 5-FU with gemcitabine alone for patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This trial involved patients with biopsy-proven, advanced carcinoma of the pancreas not amenable to surgical resection. Patients were randomized to receive either gemcitabine alone (1,000 mg/m(2)/wk) weekly for 3 weeks of every 4 or to receive gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)/wk) followed by 5-FU (600 mg/m(2)/wk) weekly on the same schedule. The primary end point of the trial was survival, with secondary end points of time to progression and response rate. RESULTS: Of 327 patients enrolled over 18 months, 322 were eligible. Overall, the median survival was 5.4 months for gemcitabine alone and 6.7 months for gemcitabine plus 5-FU (P =.09). Progression-free survival for gemcitabine alone was 2.2 months, compared with 3.4 months for gemcitabine plus 5-FU (P =.022). Objective responses were uncommon and were observed in only 5.6% of patients treated with gemcitabine and 6.9% of patients treated with gemcitabine plus 5-FU. Most toxicities were hematologic or gastrointestinal; no significant differences were noted between the two treatment arms. CONCLUSION: 5-FU, administered in conjunction with gemcitabine, did not improve the median survival of patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma compared with single-agent gemcitabine. Further studies with other combinations of gemcitabine and 5-FU are not compelling, and clinical trial resources should address other combinations and novel agents.     

Phase I study of gemcitabine (difluorodeoxycytidine) in children with relapsed or refractory leukemia (CCG-0955): a report from the Children's Cancer Group

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and assess the toxicity profile and pharmacokinetics of weekly gemcitabine infusions in pediatric patients with refractory hematologic malignancies. Fourteen patients under 21 years old were given infusions of gemcitabine for escalating durations at 10 mg/m2/min weekly for three consecutive weeks. Two males and two females were studied at each dose level. Pharmacokinetics of the drug's metabolism were measured by high pressure-liquid chromatography (HPLC) for 24 h after the first dose. Intracellular difluorodeoxycytidine triphosphate formation in leukemic blasts was measured in selected patients. The MTD of gemcitabine in these patients was 3600 mg/m2/week for three consecutive weeks (10 mg/m2/min for 360 min). Hepatotoxicity was the dose limiting toxicity. Thirty to fifty percent of patients exhibited fever, rash, or myalgia. Rare instances of hypotension and pulmonary toxicity were observed. Two of six patients [one acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and one acute myelogenous leukemia (AML)] treated at the MTD had at least M2 marrows, although peripheral blood counts did not recover sufficiently for the patients to be considered in complete response. Pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine fit a two-compartment open model with terminal half-life and plasma clearance value of 62 min and 2.2 l/min/m2, respectively. No gender differences were observed. In conclusion, the MTD of gemcitabine was 10 mg/m2/min for 360 min every week for 3 weeks. This is the recommended phase II dose schedule for children with leukemia. The activity of the drug at this schedule in heavily pretreated, refractory patients warrants a phase II trial in hematologic malignancies.     

Phase I study of CPT-11 and continuous 5-FU / l-leucovorin combination therapy(modified AIO regimen)in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

A combination of CPT-11, continuous 5-fluorouracil(5-FU)and leucovorin(LV), the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Internistische Onkologie(AIO)regimen, is widely used for the treatment of metastatic CRC. The efficacy and toxicity of this regimen, however, have not been determined in Japanese patients with metastatic CRC. Our objective was to evaluate the safety of the AIO regimen plus CPT-11 in Japanese colorectal carcinoma(CRC)patients. We investigated the maximum tolerated dose(MTD), dose-limiting toxicity(DLT), and recommended dose(RD)for CPT-11 and continuous 5-FU. CPT-11, 5-FU, and l-LV were administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The dose of CPT- 11 was escalated from 40 mg/m2 (level 1)to 80 mg/m2 (level 3). The 5-FU dose was then escalated from 1,000 mg/m2 (level 4)to 2,000 mg/m2 (level 5). If neither level met the criteria for the MTD, the recommended dose was defined as level 5, and the dose escalation was discontinued, because the maximum approved weekly dose of CPT-11 alone in Japan is 80 mg/m2 and the dose of 5-FU in the original AIO regimen was 2,000 mg/m2. A total of 18 patients were enrolled in this study. Hematological and non-hematological toxicity were infrequent and mild. There were no toxicities greater than grade 2 at each dose level. Level 5 did not meet the MTD criteria. Our results confirm that the modified AIO plus CPT-11 regimen is safe for Japanese patients. The recommended doses in the present study were CPT-11 80 mg/m2, 5-FU 2,000 mg/m2, and l-LV 250 mg/m2.     

Phase I study of a weekly schedule of irinotecan, high-dose leucovorin, and infusional fluorouracil as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of a weekly schedule of irinotecan (CPT-11), leucovorin (LV), and a 24-hour infusion of fluorouracil (5-FU24h) as first-line chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer and to assess preliminary data on the antitumor activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with measurable metastatic colorectal cancer were entered onto this phase I study. In the first six dose levels, fixed doses of CPT-11 (80 mg/m2) and LV (500 mg/m2) in combination with escalated doses of 5-FU24h ranging from 1.8 to 2.6 g/m2 were administered on a weekly-times-four (dose levels 1 to 4) or weekly-times-six (dose levels 5 to 6) schedule. The dose of CPT-11 was then increased to 100 mg/m2 (dose level 7). RESULTS: Seventy-nine cycles of 5-FU24h/LV with CPT-11 were administered in an outpatient setting. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed during the first cycle at dose levels 1 to 6, but diarrhea of grade 4 (National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria) was observed in three patients after multiple treatment cycles. Other nonhematologic and hematologic side effects, specifically alopecia and neutropenia, did not exceed grade 2. With the escalation of CPT-11 to 100 mg/m2 (dose level 7), diarrhea of grade 3 or higher was observed in four of six patients during the first cycle; thus, the MTD was achieved. Sixteen of 25 response-assessable patients (64%; 95% confidence interval, 45% to 83%) achieved an objective response. CONCLUSION: The recommended doses for further studies are CPT-11 80 mg/m2, LV 500 mg/m2, and 5-FU24h 2.6 g/m2 given on a weekly-times-six schedule followed by a 1-week rest period. The addition of CPT-11 to 5-FU24h/LV seems to improve the therapeutic efficacy in terms of tumor response with manageable toxicity.     

A phase I study of oxaliplatin in combination with gemcitabine: correlation of clinical outcome with gene expression

Purpose Oxaliplatin has in vitro activity similar to or higher than other platinum agents. Preclinically, gemcitabine has demonstrated synergy when combined with platinum compounds. These facts formed the rationale for determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin. Methods Eligible patients with advanced incurable solid tumors were given oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² as a 2-h infusion on day 1 followed by escalating doses of gemcitabine given over 30 min on day 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Results A total of 43 patients were enrolled, including 30 patients at the MTD in an expanded cohort. At a gemcitabine dose of 800 mg/m², 1/6 patients had a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) (grade 3 blurred vision and memory loss). At 1,000 mg/m², 1/6 patients had a DLT (grade 3 increase in AST). At 1,200 mg/m², 2/3 patients had a DLT (grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 confusion). The MTD of gemcitabine with 130 mg/m² of oxaliplatin was therefore 1,000 mg/m². The clearances of gemcitabine and ultrafilterable platinum are within the ranges previously reported for single agents. A patient with colon cancer had a partial response, and 21 patients had a best response of stable disease. In patients with tumor biopsies treated at the MTD, decreased ribonucleotide reductase M2 expression correlated with response. Conclusion Treatment with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin was well tolerated with primarily hematologic toxicity at the MTD. Study of biochemical correlates of response remain of interest althought current results remain exploratory. This study was supported by National Cancer Institute grants U01 CA62505 and P30 CA33572.     

A phase I study of gemcitabine and irinotecan as second line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

A phase I study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of gemcitabine and irinotecan combination therapy as second line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Twelve patients with measurable NSCLC (age range 46-74 years; 7 males, 5 females; performance status 0 = 4, 1 = 8) who progressed or failed first-line chemotherapy were enrolled. Prior chemotherapy was platinum-based without gemcitabine or irinotecan. Gemcitabine was administered at a fixed dose of 1,000 mg/m2 after irinotecan administration, and irinotecan was administered at doses from 50 to 125 mg/m2 with an increment of 25 mg/m2, both on day 1 and 8. Chemotherapy was repeated every 3 weeks. Grade 3/4 leukopenia occurred in three patients (25%), neutropenia in four (33%), anemia in one (8%), and thrombocytopenia in one (8%). Grade 3 nausea and vomiting was observed in three (25%), grade 2 diarrhea in one (8%), and liver dysfunction in one (8%). Other toxicities were mild. Two of the three patients at level 4 (irinotecan 125 mg/m2) experienced dose limiting toxicity: one patient experienced grade 4 leukopenia and neutropenia, and the other experienced treatment delay of more than 2 weeks. The objective response rate was 16.6% (2/12). The maximum tolerated dose in this combination therapy was gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 and irinotecan 125 mg/m2. The dose level of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 and irinotecan 100 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle is recommended for a phase II study.     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of weekly 5-fluorouracil administered with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and high-dose leucovorin: a potential role for growth factor as mucosal protectant

Diarrhea is dose-limiting with weekly 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus high-dose leucovorin (LV). Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) has been associated with a decrease in chemotherapy-associated mucosal toxicity. This study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly 5-FU when administered with GM-CSF and high-dose LV. Patients were treated with intravenous LV 500 mg/m2 plus 5-FU weekly for six doses followed by a 2-week rest. GM-CSF 250 mg/m2 was administered subcutaneously 5 days each week. Cohorts were treated with 5-FU at 600, 700, and 800 mg/m2 weekly. Twenty-nine patients were treated. The MTD of 5-FU in this schedule was 700 mg/m2/week, with diarrhea dose-limiting. 5-FU delivered dose intensity at the MTD was 424 +/- 23.7 mg/m2/week, including rest periods. 5-FU and LV pharmacokinetics were not altered by concurrent treatment with GM-CSF. In a weekly schedule with high-dose LV and GM-CSF, the MTD of 5-FU and 5-FU delivered dose intensity were higher than previously reported with 5-FU and LV administered without GM-CSF.     

Phase I study to evaluate multiple regimens of intravenous 5-fluorouracil administered in combination with weekly gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors: a potential broadly active regimen for advanced solid tumor malignancies.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and toxicity profile of gemcitabine given on a weekly schedule with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with advanced solid tumors received escalating doses of gemcitabine 200 and 300 mg/m(2) weekly as a 30-minute infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks (schedule 1) or 450, 600, 800, 1000, 1250, 1500, 1800, and 2200 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8 (schedule 2) every 3 weeks, respectively. At the completion of gemcitabine infusion (Day 1), patients received fixed dose continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil at either 300 mg/m(2) (Days 1-21) or 200 mg/m(2) (Days 1-21; schedule 1) every 4 weeks or 200 mg/m(2) (Days 1-14; schedule 2] every 3 weeks, respectively. Toxicity assessments were performed weekly on study, and efficacy measurements were performed every 6-8 weeks. RESULTS: Seventy patients with advanced solid malignancies received a total of 220 cycles of combination chemotherapy. Eleven (14.3%) patients received no more than 1 treatment cycle of combination therapy. Schedule 1 maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine was 600 mg/m(2)/week when combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at 200 mg/m(2)/day (Days 1-21) repeated every 4 weeks. The schedule 2 maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine was 2200 mg/m(2)/week when combined with 5-FU dosed at 200 mg/m(2)/day (Days 1-14) repeated every 3 weeks. In schedule 1, the limiting factor for gemcitabine delivery was the Day 15 dose that often was omitted because of myelosuppression and/or mucositis. In schedule 1 cycle 1, nonhematologic toxicity was common and included Grade 3-4 toxicities: mucositis (8 patients), fatigue (2 patients), and anorexia (1 patient). One patient had Grade 3-4 neutropenia at dose level 5 (maximum tolerated dose). In schedule 2 cycle 1, hematologic toxicities were more common than nonhematologic toxicity and included Grade 3 anemia (3 patients), Grade 3 neutropenia (4 patients), and Grade 3 thrombocytopenia (2 patients). The nonhematologic toxicities included Grade 3 mucositis (3 patients), Grade 3 fatigue (2 patients), and Grade 3 dehydration (1 patient). Overall, antitumor activity was observed in seven patients. Three of 30 patients with cytokine refractory renal cell carcinoma (RCC; relative risk [RR] 10 %; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-22%) had a partial response. Of the remaining 27 patients with RCC, 4 patients had a minor response, and 10 patients had stable disease lasting a median of 6.4 (range, 4-12) months. The remaining 5 responses occurred in 40 patients (RR, 12.5%; 95% CI, 4.2-26.8%): 2 patients with 5-FU refractory colon carcinoma, 1 patient with hepatoma, 1 patient with paclitaxel-cisplatin-resistant ovarian carcinoma, and 1 patient with cisplatin-resistant head and neck squamous cell carcinoma had a partial response. CONCLUSIONS: For Phase II development, gemcitabine 450-600 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 8, and 15 can be safely combined with 5-FU 200 mg/m(2) given as a continuous infusion (Days 1-21) of a 28-day cycle or gemcitabine 1800 mg/m(2) Days 1 and 8 given with 5-FU 200 mg/m(2) as a continuous infusion (Days 1-14) of a 21-day cycle. The observed antitumor activity in several solid tumors, especially in renal cell carcinoma, warrants broad Phase II evaluation.     

Phase I clinical trial of weekly combined topotecan and irinotecan

Combining antineoplastic analogues may increase efficacy by increasing the serum and intracellular concentration of the cytotoxic moiety shared by the analogues. Topotecan and irinotecan are two camptothecan analogues that are active in different human tumors (topotecan in ovary; irinotecan in colon) and in different experimental tumor systems. These data suggest that different mechanisms of drug resistance may be operative for the two agents, and if incomplete cross-resistance exists between analogues, concomitant administration may be advantageous. The objectives of this phase I study were 1) to determine in a phase trial design whether topotecan and irinotecan administered concomitantly on a weekly schedule can be delivered at the same dose intensity as that of single-agent topotecan or irinotecan delivery; and 2) to determine whether hematologic and/or nonhematologic toxicity is increased with topotecan and irinotecan administered together as a prelude to a possible phase II trial in responsive tumor categories. Irinotecan was administered for 30 to 45 minutes weekly x 4 at four dose levels: 50, 75, 100, and 125 mg/m(2)/wk. Topotecan was administered for 30 minutes (after irinotecan administration) at two dose levels within each of the irinotecan dose levels (1.0 and 1.5 mg/m(2)). Concomitant single-dose granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was used for leukocyte counts between 1,000 cells/mm(3) and 3,500 cells/mm(3) to maintain schedule. Maximum tolerated dosage (MTD) for the topotecan and irinotecan combination was defined as that which permitted 4 weeks of topotecan and irinotecan administration with G-CSF at or near the dose intensity reported for each single agent. Twenty-one patients received 32 4-week cycles. Dose-limiting toxicity was hematologic with grade IV leukopenia and neutropenia occurring at all dose levels. There was no apparent increase in the diarrhea syndrome associated with irinotecan. The MTD for irinotecan (at 125 mg/m(2)/wk) is the same MTD as with single-agent irinotecan use. The MTD for concomitant topotecan (1.5 mg/m(2)/wk) is 60% of the single-agent topotecan dose for the 5-day topotecan schedule (at 2.5 mg/m(2)/wk) but only 30% of the single-agent topotecan dose for the weekly schedule (5 mg/m(2)/wk). The topoisomerase I inhibitor dose is increased minimally when the analogues are administered concomitantly on a weekly schedule. Comparative trials of single-agent topotecan and irinotecan versus the combination of topotecan and irinotecan would be necessary to provide the proof of principle that combining analogues can increase therapeutic effectiveness.     

A phase I safety, pharmacological, and biological study of the farnesyl protein transferase inhibitor, lonafarnib (SCH 663366), in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE: This phase I study was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacological properties and biological activity of the combination of the lonafarnib, a farnesylproteintransferase (FTPase) inhibitor, with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid malignancies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This was a single institution study to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of escalating lonafarnib (75-125 mg po BID) with gemcitabine (750-1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15) and fixed cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) day 1) every 28 days. Due to dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in initial patients, these patients were considered "heavily pre-treated" and the protocol was amended to limit prior therapy and re-escalate lonafarnib in "less heavily pre-treated patients" on 28-day and 21-day schedules. Cycle 1 and 2 pharmacokinetics (PK), and farnesylation of the HDJ2 chaperone protein and FPTase activity were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients received 53 courses of therapy. Nausea, vomiting, and fatigue were frequent in all patients. Severe toxicities were observed in 91% of patients: neutropenia (41%), nausea (36%), thrombocytopenia (32%), anemia (23%) and vomiting (23%). Nine patients withdrew from the study due to toxicity. DLTs of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and fatigue limited dose-escalation on the 28-day schedule. The MTD was established as lonafarnib 75 mg BID, gemcitabine 750 mg/m(2) days 1, 8, 15, and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) in heavily pre-treated patients. The MTD in the less heavily pre-treated patients could not be established on the 28-day schedule as DLTs were observed at the lowest dose level, and dose escalation was not completed on the 21-day schedule due to early study termination by the Sponsor. No PK interactions were observed. FTPase inhibition was not observed at the MTD, however HDJ-2 gel shift was observed in one patient at the 100 mg BID lonafarnib dose. Anti-cancer activity was observed: four patients had stable disease lasting >2 cycles, one subject had a complete response, and another had a partial response, both with metastatic breast cancer. CONCLUSION: Lonafarnib 75 mg BID, gemcitabine 750 mg/m(2) days 1, 8, 15, and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) day 1 on a 28-day schedule was established as the MTD. Lonafarnib did not demonstrate FTPase inhibition at these doses. Despite the observed efficacy, substantial toxicity and questionable contribution of anti-tumor activity of lonafarnib to gemcitabine and cisplatin limits further exploration of this combination.     

Phase I/II trial of irinotecan plus high-dose 5-fluorouracil (TTD regimen) as first-line chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a phase I/II study of weekly irinotecan [30 min intravenous (i.v.) infusion] combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU 3 g/m(2) weekly 48 h i.v. infusion, TTD regimen) as first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in the treatment of gastrointestinal solid tumors (in phase I), and the antitumor activity and toxicity of the recommended phase I dose (in phase II) were determined. RESULTS: Diarrhea was the DLT, and irinotecan 80 mg/m(2) plus 5-FU 3 g/m(2) was the recommended phase I dose. In phase II, the confirmed response rate was 44% [95% confidence interval (CI) 29% to 59%] and the median overall survival was 23.8 months. However, grade 3/4 diarrhea affected 59% of patients and led to withdrawal of three patients. A second cohort of patients studied using the same schedule but with a reduced 5-FU starting dose of 2.25 g/m(2) showed improved tolerance (the incidence of grade 4 diarrhea decreased from 28% to 11% and overall grade 3/4 diarrhea to 56%, with no patient withdrawals) but the confirmed response rate was 28% (95% CI 14% to 45%) and median overall survival was 17.2 months. CONCLUSIONS: We found weekly irinotecan 80 mg/m(2) plus TTD regimen (5-FU 2.25 g/m(2) given as 48-h i.v. infusion) to be a feasible and active combined chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.     

Phase I and pharmacologic study of PN401 and fluorouracil in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of administering PN401, an oral uridine prodrug, as a rescue agent for the toxic effects of fluorouracil (5-FU), and to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of 5-FU when given with PN401, with an 8-hour treatment interval between these agents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with escalating doses of 5-FU, given as a rapid intravenous infusion weekly for 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks. PN401 was administered orally 8 hours after 5-FU administration, to achieve sustained plasma uridine concentrations of at least 50 micromol/L. Initially, patients received 6 g of PN401 orally every 8 hours for eight doses (schedule 1). When dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was consistently noted, patients then received 6 g of PN401 every 2 hours for three doses and every 6 hours thereafter for 15 doses (schedule 2). RESULTS: Twenty-three patients received 50 courses of 5-FU and PN401. Among patients on schedule 1, DLT (grade 4 neutropenia complicated by fever and diarrhea) occurred in those receiving 5-FU 1,250 mg/m(2)/wk. Among patients on schedule 2, 5-FU 1,250 mg/m(2)/wk was well tolerated, but grade 4, protracted (> 5 days) neutropenia was consistently noted in those treated with higher doses of the drugs. Nonhematologic effects were uncommon and rarely severe. The pharmacokinetics of 5-FU, assessed in 12 patients on schedule 2, were nonlinear, with the mean area under the time-versus-concentration curve (AUC) increasing from 298 +/- 44 to 962 +/- 23 micromol/L and mean clearance decreasing from 34 +/- 4 to 15.6 +/- 0.38 L/h/m(2) as the dose of 5-FU was increased from 1,250 to 1,950 mg/m(2)/wk. 5-FU AUCs achieved with 5-FU 1,250 mg/m(2)/wk for 6 weeks along with the intensified PN401 dose schedule were approximately five-fold higher than those achieved with 5-FU alone. Plasma uridine concentrations increased with each of the three PN401 doses given every 2 hours, and uridine steady-state concentrations were greater than 50 micromol/L. CONCLUSION: Treatment with oral PN401 beginning 8 hours after 5-FU administration is well tolerated and results in sustained plasma uridine concentrations above therapeutic-relevant levels. The recommended 5-FU dosage for phase II evaluations is 1,250 mg/m(2)/wk for 3 weeks every 4 weeks with the intensified PN401 dose schedule (schedule 2). At this dose, systemic exposure to 5-FU as measured by AUC was five-fold higher than that observed after administration of a conventional 5-FU bolus.