Analgesic efficacy of rofecoxib compared with codeine/acetaminophen using a model of acute dental pain.

OBJECTIVE: To determine analgesic efficacy of a single oral dose of rofecoxib 50 mg compared with acetaminophen/codeine 600/60 mg, we conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo- and active-comparator-controlled, parallel-group study. STUDY DESIGN: Patients (N = 390) experiencing moderate or severe pain postextraction of 2 or more third molars, with at least 1 mandibular impaction, were randomized to placebo (n = 30), rofecoxib (n = 180), or codeine/acetaminophen 60/600 mg (n = 180). Time to confirmed perceptible pain relief, and patient evaluations of pain intensity, pain relief, and global assessments were recorded. RESULTS: For total pain relief over 6 hours (primary end point), rofecoxib was superior to codeine/acetaminophen (15.5 vs 10.7; P < .001). Rofecoxib was statistically significantly superior to codeine/acetaminophen with respect to TOPAR4, patient global assessment, peak pain relief, and duration of analgesic effect. Median onset of analgesia was similar for both drugs. The codeine/acetaminophen group had more patients with 1 or more adverse events. CONCLUSION: Rofecoxib provided superior analgesic efficacy compared with codeine/acetaminophen with fewer gastrointestinal and nervous system adverse events.     

A randomized controlled trial comparing acetaminophen plus ibuprofen versus acetaminophen plus codeine plus caffeine after outpatient general surgery

BACKGROUND: Narcotics are used extensively in outpatient general surgery but are often poorly tolerated with variable efficacy. Acetaminophen combined with NSAIDs is a possible alternative. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of acetaminophen, codeine, and caffeine (Tylenol No. 3) with acetaminophen and ibuprofen for management of pain after outpatient general surgery procedures. STUDY DESIGN: A double-blind randomized controlled trial was performed in patients undergoing outpatient inguinal/umbilical/ventral hernia repair or laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were randomized to receive acetaminophen plus codeine plus caffeine (Tylenol No. 3) or acetaminophen plus ibuprofen (AcIBU) 4 times daily for 7 days or until pain-free. Pain intensity, measured four times daily by visual analogue scale, was the primary outcome. Secondary end points included incidence of side effects, patient satisfaction, number of days until patient was pain-free, and use of alternative analgesia. RESULTS: One hundred forty-six patients were randomized (74 Tylenol No. 3 and 72 AcIBU), and 139 (95%) patients completed the study. No significant differences in mean or maximum daily visual analogue scale scores were identified between the 2 groups, except on postoperative day 2, when pain was improved in AcIBU patients (p = 0.025). During the entire week, mean visual analogue scale score was modestly lower in AcIBU patients (p = 0.018). More patients in the AcIBU group, compared with Tylenol No. 3, were satisfied with their analgesia (83% versus 64%, respectively; p = 0.02). There were more side effects with Tylenol No. 3 (57% versus 41%, p = 0.045), and the discontinuation rate was also higher in Tylenol No. 3-treated patients (11% versus 3%, p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: When compared with Tylenol No. 3, AcIBU was not an inferior analgesic and was associated with fewer side effects and higher patient satisfaction. AcIBU is an effective, low-cost, and safe alternative to codeine-based narcotic analgesia for outpatient general surgery procedures.     

Intravenous acetaminophenvs oral ibuprofen in combination with morphine PCIA after Cesarean delivery

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of iv acetaminophen with those of oral ibuprofen with respect to postoperative pain control and morphine requirements in patients receiving morphine patient-controlled iv analgesia (PCIA) after Cesarean delivery. METHODS: Forty-five term patients scheduled for Cesarean delivery were randomized to receive acetaminophen 1 g iv every six hours plus oral placebo (group A) or ibuprofen 400 mg po every six hours plus iv placebo (group I); the first dose of study drug was given 30 min preoperatively. Postoperatively, all patients received PCIA for 48 hr using morphine bolus dose 2 mg iv, lockout interval ten minutes, and no basal infusion. Visual analogue scale (VAS; 0 to 10) at rest and morphine requirements were recorded every hour for four hours then every four hours for a total of 48 hr postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was recorded on a ten-point scale (from 1 to 10) 48 hr postoperatively. RESULTS: Visual analogue scale scores decreased similarly in both groups over time, however, there were no differences between groups at any time during the study period (estimated marginal means: 1.4 +/- SEM 0.2 vs 1.9 +/- SEM 0.2 for groups A and I, respectively, P = 0.124). Cumulative doses of postoperative morphine were 98 +/- 37 vs 93 +/- 33 mg for groups A and I, respectively (P = 0.628). Patient satisfaction with analgesia was high in both groups (9 +/- 1 vs 9 +/- 1, P = 0.93). CONCLUSION: Intravenous acetaminophen is a reasonable alternative to oral ibuprofen as an adjunct to morphine patient-controlled analgesia after Cesarean delivery.     

Analgesia after intracranial surgery: a double-blind, prospective comparison of codeine and tramadol

We have compared codeine and tramadol in a prospective, double-blind study of postoperative analgesia in 75 patients after elective intracranial surgery. Twenty-five patients received codeine 60 mg, tramadol 50 mg or tramadol 75 mg i.m. Patients receiving codeine had significantly lower pain scores over the first 48 h after operation (P < 0.0001). Although there was no difference in visual analogue scale (VAS) scores between the three groups at 24 h, the codeine group had significantly lower scores at 48 h (P < 0.0001). The tramadol 75 mg group had significantly higher scores for both sedation and nausea and vomiting (P < 0.0001 for both scores). We conclude that codeine 60 mg i.m. provided better postoperative analgesia than tramadol after craniotomy and that tramadol 75 mg should be avoided because of its side effects of increased sedation and nausea and vomiting.      

Comparison of 0.25 mg and 0.1 mg intrathecal morphine for analgesia after Cesarean section

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that 0.1 mg intrathecal morphine plus NSAIDs provides satisfactory analgesia post-Cesarean section with fewer side effects than 0.25 mg intrathecal morphine. METHODS: Sixty women, scheduled for elective Cesarean section under spinal anesthesia, were randomized to receive either 0.1 mg or 0.25 mg intrathecal morphine combined with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.75% and 20 microg fentanyl. All patients received a 100 mg indomethacin suppository at the end of surgery and 500 mg naproxen p.o. b.i.d. was started the evening of surgery and continued until discharge. A blinded researcher recorded the pain, pruritus, and nausea scores, the time to first request for additional analgesics, a visual analogue scale (VAS) satisfaction score, and the use of additional opioids, antipruritics, and/or antiemetics. RESULTS: Of the 60 patients enrolled, two were not included in the data analysis because of protocol violations leaving 30 patients in the 0.1 mg group and 28 in the 0.25 mg group. There were no differences in the VAS pain scores or the number of women requesting an opioid other than codeine between the two groups. The VAS pruritus scores in the 0.1 mg group were lower throughout the 24 hr (P < 0.001). Fewer women in the 0.1 mg group (4/30 vs 12/28) requested nalbuphine to treat itching (P = 0.018). Nausea scores were lower in the 0.1 mg group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of 0.1 mg intrathecal morphine plus NSAIDs provides analgesia of similar quality to 0.25 mg but with fewer undesirable side effects following Cesarean section.     

Optimal dose of fentanyl for postoperative epidural analgesia after thoracic surgery

BACKGROUND: We investigated the dose of fentanyl in ropivacaine for epidural anesthesia that will provide effective analgesia with minimal side effects after thoracic surgery. METHODS: Sixty patients scheduled to undergo thoracic surgery were randomly allocated to four groups according to fentanyl dose in epidural analgesia: group R (0 microg x hr(-1); n = 15), group F1 (5 microg x hr(-1); n = 15), group F2 (10 microg x hr(-1); n = 15) and group F3 (15 microg x hr(-1); n = 15). Pain scores (visual analogue scale: VAS) were assessed at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hrs after surgery. Degrees of satisfaction regarding pain relief and complications during a period of 48 hrs after surgery were compared. RESULTS: Pain scores in group F3 were significantly lower than those in the other groups at 3, 6, and 12 hrs after surgery. The number of postoperative analgesics used in group R was significantly more than the numbers used in other groups. The incidences of side effects were similar in the four groups. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that continuous epidural administration of more than 15 microg x hr(-1) of fentanyl in ropivacaine provides pain relief and few side effects after thoracic surgery.     

Interpleural analgesia improves pulmonary function after cholecystectomy

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of interpleural bupivacaine on analgesia and ventilatory capacity after cholecystectomy. Forty-two patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to two groups: one to receive interpleural administration of bupivacaine-adrenaline mixture (Group 1 = 22 patients) and the other standard administration of intramuscular meperidine (Group 2 = 20 patients) for postoperative pain relief. The intensity of pain was evaluated by a visual analogue scale (VAS) preoperatively as well as at 2, 8, 24 and 48 hr postoperatively. At the same time, FVC and FEV1.0 measurements were obtained for all patients. The group given interpleural bupivacaine had better pain relief with mean VAS of 0.6 +/- 0.9 (mean +/- SD) 1.1 +/- 1.4, 0.6 +/- 0.9 and 0.8 +/- 1.2 compared with 5.2 +/- 2.2, 5.8 +/- 2.7, 5.5 +/- 2.2 and 4.5 +/- 1.8 for patients receiving meperidine (P less than 0.001). The patients in Group 1 also had larger FVC and FEV than those in Group 2: FVC 22 +/- 14.5 per cent vs 32 +/- 15.2 per cent (P less than 0.005), FEV1.0 25 +/- 15.5 vs 38 +/- 14.8 per cent (P less than 0.001) (mean +/- SD). We conclude that the interpleural analgesia can achieve better pain relief with greater ventilatory capacity than a standard analgesic regimen in the first two days after cholecystectomy.     

Analgesia following arthroscopic surgery: comparison of diflunisal and acetaminophen with codeine

In this study, 40 postarthroscopy patients were treated with either diflunisal or acetaminophen with codeine to control postoperative pain. In comparing these two drugs, better known as Dolobid and Tylenol #3, the results were comparable, though acetaminophen with codeine seemed to have a more rapid onset of action. Diflunisal provided better continuity of analgesia and less frequent dosing.     

Tramadol suppositories are less suitable for post-operative pain relief than rectal acetaminophen/codeine.

The suitability of tramadol suppositories for inclusion in our hospital formulary for the treatment of mild to moderate post-operative pain was evaluated. In an open randomized trial, rectal tramadol was compared with our standard treatment acetaminophen/codeine suppositories. We expected tramadol to be equally effective as our current standard but with fewer side effects. Forty patients were treated with either tramadol suppositories 100 mg 6 hourly (qds) or acetaminophen/codeine suppositories 1000/20 mg qds. Patients were comparable with regard to demographic data and type of surgery and anaesthesia. Post-operative pain was scored with the aid of a Visual Analogue Scale before each drug administration, at rest and during movement. Side effects, notably nausea and vomiting, were recorded by interviewing the patients and by inspecting the nursing report. There was no difference in pain scores between the two groups. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly higher in the tramadol-treated (84%) than in the acetaminophen/codeine treated group (31%). The relative risk of experiencing an episode of nausea under treatment with tramadol was 2.7 (95% confidence interval: 1.3-5.3; P = 0.0001) as compared with acetaminophen/codeine. We conclude that for acute treatment of mild to moderate post-operative pain frequent nausea and vomiting makes tramadol suppositories less suitable than acetaminophen/codeine.     

The difficulties of ambulatory interscalene and intra-articular infusions for rotator cuff surgery: a preliminary report

PURPOSE: Rotator cuff repair may result in severe postoperative pain. We compared a continuous intra-articular infusion to a continuous interscalene block with ropivacaine for patients undergoing outpatient rotator cuff repair. METHODS: Seventeen patients were randomized to one of two groups: 1) interscalene block with 0.5% ropivacaine (40 mL) followed by a postoperative intra-articular infusion or; 2) interscalene block with 0.5% ropivacaine (40 mL) followed by a postoperative continuous interscalene infusion. Infusions were 0.2% ropivacaine at 10 mL x hr(-1) for both groups. Infusions were maintained for 48 hr. Patients were discharged on the day of surgery. Verbal analogue pain scores (VAS) and postoperative oxycodone consumption were measured for 48 hr. RESULTS: Eight patients (47%; four in each group) had side effects or logistical problems complicating care. The mean VAS scores at rest and with movement in the postanesthesia care unit and at 12 hr, 24 hr, and 48 hr were not different (P > 0.1). Inadequate analgesia was reported in 50-75% of all study patients. Time until first oxycodone use was similar between groups 829 min +/- 432 (interscalene) and 999 min +/- 823 (intra-articular; P = 0.6). Total oxycodone consumption was also similar 49 mg +/- 48 and 59 mg +/- 51 (P = 0.7), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the difficulties of ambulatory interscalene and intra-articular infusion for rotator cuff surgery. The high VAS scores and need for additional medical care suggest that intra-articular administration may not be reasonable for this magnitude of surgery. Further refinement of the perineural local anesthetic infusion is necessary to consistently provide analgesia after ambulatory rotator cuff surgery.     

Epidural dexamethasone reduces postoperative pain and analgesic requirements

PURPOSE: Epidural steroids may have potential advantages for providing postoperative analgesia. We therefore undertook a study to evaluate the efficacy of epidurally administered dexamethasone in reducing postoperative morphine requirements, as a measure of analgesia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind study, 94 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to one of three groups. Group 1 (Control) patients received dexamethasone 5 mg iv with epidural injection of 0.25% bupivacaine 8 mL and normal saline 2 mL, Group 2 (D1) patients received normal saline 2 mL iv with epidural injection of 0.25% bupivacaine 8 mL and dexamethasone 5 mg in normal saline 2 mL, and Group 3 (D2) patients received normal saline 2 mL iv with epidural injection of dexamethasone 5 mg in normal saline 10 mL. After surgery, morphine 2-4 mg iv was administered as needed for analgesia. Postoperative morphine requirements, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores at rest and with effort, and time to first analgesic administration were recorded by a blinded observer. RESULTS: Total morphine consumption for the first 24 hr following surgery was lower in both epidural dexamethasone groups (D1, D2) compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The percentage reduction in morphine consumption in Group D1 was 53.9% and in Group D2 was 52.9% in the first 24 hr. Postoperatively at 12 hr, 18 hr and 24 hr, the VAS scores at rest and during effort were also lower in the epidural dexamethasone groups (D1, D2) compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The percentage reductions in VAS scores with effort at 12 hr, 18 hr and 24 hr in Group D1 were 50%, 52.9% and 50% respectively, and in Group D2 percentage reductions in pain scores with effort were 54.8%, 58.8% and 55.5% at corresponding sampling intervals. CONCLUSION: Preoperative epidural administration of dexamethasone 5 mg, with or without bupivacaine, reduces postoperative pain and morphine consumption following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.     

Effect of mandibular nerve block on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing oropharyngeal carcinoma surgery under general anaesthesia

BACKGROUND: Postoperative analgesia after oropharyngeal carcinoma surgery remains poorly studied. This study investigates the effects of mandibular nerve block (MNB) with ropivacaine 10 mg ml(-1) in conjunction with general anaesthesia (GA) on postoperative analgesia after partial glossectomy or transmandibular lateral pharyngectomy. METHODS: In a randomized double-blind study, 42 patients (21 in each group) received an MNB by the lateral extra-oral approach (MNB group) or a deep s.c. injection of normal saline (control group). Both groups received a standardized general anaesthetic. Postoperative analgesia included fixed dose of i.v. acetaminophen and morphine via a patient-controlled analgesia device. Consumption of morphine and supplemental analgesics and pain scores at rest were measured. RESULTS: The mean cumulative morphine consumption was reduced by 56 and 45% at 12 and 24 h after operation in the MNB group. The administration of analgesic rescue medications was delayed in the MNB group. The visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores were comparable in the two groups during the first 24 h. Adequate analgesia (mean VAS < or = 3) was observed throughout the study period in the MNB group, but only from 4 h after operation onwards in the control group. The number of patients who experienced severe pain (VAS > 7) during the first postoperative day was lower in the MNB group than in the control group (3 vs 10. respectively, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, MNB performed before GA for oropharyngeal carcinoma surgery improved postoperative analgesia, resulting in reduced morphine consumption at 24 h and severe pain in fewer patients.     

Comparison of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with tramadol or morphine

PURPOSE: To compared the clinical efficacy of tramadol and morphine using a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) delivery system. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, double blind study, we evaluated 80 adult patients scheduled for elective hip or knee arthroplasty with general inhalational anesthesia. When patients complained of pain in the recovery room, patients were randomized to receive either tramadol or morphine by titration in 30 min to achieve analgesia (VAS < or =4). Equivalent volumes containing either 30 mg x ml(-1) tramadol or 1 mg x ml(-1) morphine were used for PCA with a lockout interval of 10 min. The patients were followed six-hourly for 48 hr for VAS, satisfaction rate, analgesic dose, and side effects. RESULTS: Patients obtained adequate analgesia with either drug. More patients had very good satisfaction scores in the morphine group in the recovery room (43% vs. 23%, P<0.05) and at 24 hr (40% vs. 20%, P<0.05) than those in the tramadol group. More nausea was evident in the tramadol group (48% vs. 11% in recovery room and 28% vs. 12% in 24 hr, P<0.05) than in the morphine group. Vomiting was also more (28% vs. 5% in recovery room, 15% vs. 3% in 24 hr, P<0.05). Morphine produced more sleepiness (45% vs. 23% in recovery room, P<0.05 and 35% vs. 15% in 24 hr, P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Tramadol PCA can provide effective analgesia following major orthopedic surgery provided sufficiently high doses are given for loading and by patient demand. However, the incidence of nausea/vomiting is also higher causing decreased satisfaction.     

Analgesia after day case laparoscopic sterilisation#A comparison of tramadol with paracetamol/dextropropoxyphene and paracetamol/codeine combinations

In a prospective, double-blind trial we compared the analgesic efficacy of tramadol during the first 24 h after day case laparoscopic sterilisation with two commonly prescribed combination analgesics. Seventy-five women were allocated randomly to receive oral paracetamol 325 mg/dextropropoxyphene hydrochloride 32.5 mg, tramadol 50 mg or paracetamol 500 mg/codeine phosphate 30 mg as required after a standardised anaesthetic technique. There were no significant differences in average or worst pain, sleep disturbance, mobility, number of tablets taken, satisfaction or preference for stronger analgesia (26.2% of all patients). The incidences of nausea and vomiting were comparable between groups. There was a trend towards a lower incidence of central nervous system side-effects (drowsiness, dizziness, headache) in the paracetamol/codeine group. Tramadol may be considered an alternative analgesic for day case surgery although analgesic regimens of greater efficacy are required for many patients. The relative incidence of side-effects for tramadol and other analgesics requires further evaluation.     

Three-port versus standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial in a community-based teaching hospital in eastern Nepal.

OBJECTIVES: With increasing surgeon experience, laparoscopic cholecystectomy has undergone many refinements including reduction in port number and size. Three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been reported to be safe and feasible in various clinical trials. However, whether it offers any additional advantages remains controversial. This study reports a randomized trial that compared the clinical outcomes of 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: Seventy-five consecutive patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized to undergo either the 3-port or the 4-port technique. Four surgical tapes were applied to standard 4-port sites in both groups at the end of the operation. All dressings were kept intact until the first follow-up 1 week after surgery. Postoperative pain at the 4 sites was assessed on the first day after surgery by using a 10-cm unscaled visual analog scale (VAS). Other outcome measures included analgesia requirements, length of the operation, postoperative stay, and patient satisfaction score on surgery and scars. RESULTS: Demographic data were comparable for both groups. Patients in the 3-port group had shorter mean operative time (47.3+/-29.8 min vs 60.8+/-32.3 min) for the 4-port group (P=0.04) and less pain at port sites (mean score using 10-cm unscaled VAS: 2.19+/-1.06 vs 2.91+/-1.20 (P=0.02). Overall pain score, analgesia requirements, hospital stay, and patient satisfaction score (mean score using 10-cm unscaled VAS: 8.2+/-1.7 vs 7.8+/-1.7, P=0.24) on surgery and scars were similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy resulted in less individual port-site pain and similar clinical outcomes with fewer surgical scars and without any increased risk of bile duct injury compared with 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Thus, it can be recommended as a safe alternative procedure in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.     

Additive analgesic effect of codeine and paracetamol can be detected in strong, but not moderate, pain after Caesarean section

Background : A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled single oral dose study was done in order to examine whether codeine has an additive analgesic effect to that of paracetamol for moderate and strong postoperative pain after abdominal surgery. The maximum recommended single dose of paracetamol 1000 mg (Paracet®) was compared with a combination of a submnximal dose of paracetamol 800 mg plus codeine 60 mg (Paralgin forte®) and placebo for pain relief after Caesarean section in 125 patients. Methods : Visual analogue pain intensity score (VAS 0–100 mm) and categorical pain relief score were recorded for 6 hours after the study drug intake. The main efficacy variables analyzed were: pain intensity difference and summed pain intensity differences during the first 3 and 6 h after study drug intake, total pain relief during the first 3 and 6 h, global evaluation score at the end of the observation period, and time to rescue analgesic. Results : Because of protocol violations, 17 patients were excluded from the analysis of effects. Among the 108 patients included in the analysis of analgesic effect, 49 patients had moderate baseline pain (VAS between 40 and 60 mm on a 100 mm scale), and 59 patients had strong baseline pain (VAS more than 60 mm). In patients with strong baseline pain, statistically highly significant differences were documented in efficacy variables between the active drugs and placebo and between the two active drugs. However, in patients with moderate baseline pain, no differences were found between the study drugs in any of the analgesic efficacy variables. Conclusion : This study thus confirms that codeine has additive analgesic effect to paracetamol in pain after surgery. Our results show the importance of initial pain intensity in postoperative assessment of analgesic drugs. Assay-sensitivity and test power are increased by selecting patients with sufficiently high initial pain intensity and by comparing groups of patients with identical surgery and similar demographic variables.     

A comparative study of patient-controlled epidural fentanyl and single dose epidural morphine for post-caesarean analgesia

In a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study, 23 patients who had undergone Caesarean delivery under epidural anaesthesia were assessed to evaluate the effectiveness of patientcontrolled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with fentanyl compared with a single dose of epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia. Group A (n = 11) received epidural fentanyl 100 μg intraoperatively, then self-administered a maximum of two epidural fentanyl boluses 50 μg (10 μg · ml^?1) with a lockout period of five minutes for a maximum of two doses per hour. Group B (n = 11) received a single bolus of epidural morphine 3 mg (0.5 mg · ml^?1) intraoperatively and received the same instructions as Group A but had their PCA devices filled with 0.9% NaCl. Patients were assessed up to 24 hr for pain, satisfaction with pain relief, nausea and pruritus using visual analogue scales (VAS). The treatments for inadequate analgesia, nausea and pruritus as well as time to first independent ambulation were recorded. The ventilatory response to carbon dioxide challenge was measured at four and eight hours. Pain relief, satisfaction with pain relief, and the use of supplemental analgesics were similar in both groups. The mean 24 hr dose of epidural fentanyl used by group A patients was 680 μg. Pruritus was less common in Group A patients at the 8 and 24 hr observation periods (P < 0.0125). Both groups experienced the same degree of nausea and clinically unimportant respiratory depression. We conclude that PCEA with fentanyl provides analgesia equal to a single dose of epidural morphine and may be suitable for patients who have experienced considerable pruritus after epidural morphine adminstration.     

Intrathecal bupivacaine with morphine or neostigmine for postoperative analgesia after total knee replacement surgery

PURPOSE: To compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy and safety of intrathecal (IT) neostigmine and IT morphine in patients undergoing total knee replacement under spinal anesthesia. METHODS: Sixty patients scheduled for elective total knee replacement under spinal anesthesia were randomly divided into three equal groups which received IT 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 15 mg with either normal saline 0.5 mL, neostigmine 50 microg, or morphine 300 microg. The maximal level of sensory block, duration of analgesia, time to use of rescue analgesics, the overall 24-hr and four-hour interval visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, and the incidence of adverse effects were recorded for 24 hr after administration. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in maximal level of sensory block among the three groups. The morphine group had a later onset of postsurgical pain and longer time to first rescue analgesics than the neostigmine group (P <0.05). Overall 24-hr VAS pain scores were significantly higher in the saline group vs the morphine and neostigmine groups (P <0.05). Motor block lasted significantly longer in the neostigmine group than in the morphine and saline groups (P <0.05). The incidence of adverse effects was similar in the neostigmine and morphine groups except for pruritus (70%) occurring more frequently in the morphine group than in the neostigmine and saline groups (0%; P <0.05). Overall satisfaction rates were better in the neostigmine group than in the morphine and saline groups (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: IT neostigmine 50 microg produced postoperative analgesia lasting about seven hours with fewer side effects and better satisfaction ratings than IT morphine 300 microg.     

超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞用于老年患者腹股沟疝修补术的临床研究

目的 探讨超声引导下腹横肌平面(transversus abdominis plane,TAP)阻滞用于老年患者腹股沟疝修补术的安全性和有效性. 方法 选择择期行腹股沟疝修补术65岁以上老年患者60例,ASA分级Ⅰ～Ⅲ级,采用随机数字表法分为TAP阻滞组(A组)和局部浸润麻醉组(B组),每组30例.记录麻醉前(T0)、手术开始(T1)、手术开始后15 min(T2)、手术开始后30 min(T3)及手术结束(T4)时的MAP和HR;记录术后4、8、12、24h的VAS评分,追加镇痛药的例数;记录麻醉相关并发症;于术后48 h行患者麻醉满意度评价. 结果 A组术后4、8、12 h VAS评分[2(1～2)、2(1～2)、1(0～1)]均低于同时点B组[3(2～3)、3(2～3)、1(0～1)],差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).术后镇痛药追加例数A组为0例,B组为20例(66.7％),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).A组总体满意度(93％)明显高于B组(73％),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05). 结论 超声引导下TAP阻滞用于老年患者腹股沟疝修补术效果确切,对血流动力学影响小,可减少术后镇痛药用量,且患者的总体满意度高.