Heterogeneity of FeNO response to inhaled steroid in asthmatic children

Background Nitric oxide in exhaled air is regarded as an inflammation marker, and may be used to monitor the anti‐inflammatory control from inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs). However, this response to ICSs exhibits a heterogeneous pattern. Objective The study aimed to describe the independent variables associated with the heterogeneity in the response of exhaled nitric oxide to ICSs. Methods Exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), lung function, bronchial hyper‐responsiveness (BHR), specific IgE to common inhalant allergens, blood eosinophils, other atopic manifestations and variants in nitric oxide synthethase 1 (NOS1) gene were studied in a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled crossover comparison of budesonide (BUD) Turbohaler 1600 mcg daily vs. placebo in asthmatic schoolchildren. Results Forty children were included in the study from a screening of 184 asthmatic children with moderately persistent asthma, well controlled on regular BUD 400 mcg daily: 20 children with normal FeNO and 20 with raised FeNO. FeNO, BHR and forced expiratory volume in 1 s improved significantly after BUD 1600 mcg (BUD1600). However, FeNO after ICS treatment exhibited a Gaussian distribution and FeNO was significantly raised in 15 children. Allergy and BHR, but none of the other independent variables under study were significantly related to FeNO after BUD1600. Conclusion Exhaled nitric oxide exhibited a heterogeneous response to ICS in asthmatic schoolchildren. Allergy and BHR were driving FeNO level independently of high‐dose steroid treatment. This should be considered when using FeNO for steroid dose titration and monitoring of ICS anti‐inflammatory control in asthmatic children.     

Effect of budesonide and montelukast in asthmatic children exposed to relevant allergens

BACKGROUND: Montelukast has been shown to be effective in controlling the increase in exhaled NO in asthmatic children re-exposed to house dust mite (HDM). This study compared the effect of low dose inhaled budesonide and oral montelukast in preventing the expected relapse of airway inflammation and reactivity in a group of 24 mild asthmatic children allergic to HDM after a brief period of exposure to relevant allergens. METHODS: Lung function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) to methacholine (PC(20)), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels and sputum eosinophilia were evaluated. RESULTS: Pulmonary function remained stable. The BHR was unchanged after exposure in the group treated with budesonide, whereas a significant increase (P = 0.028) was observed in the patients receiving montelukast. No significant difference was observed in FeNO levels after exposure to mite antigen in the two groups. In both the groups of asthmatic children we observed a significant increase in sputum eosinophil % after the exposure to mite antigen. CONCLUSIONS: The significant increase in BHR level observed in the group of children receiving montelukast suggests a more comprehensive effect as disease controller by inhaled steroids than by leukotriene antagonist in allergic asthmatic children re-exposed to relevant allergens.     

Effect of an inhaled adenosine A2A agonist on the allergen-induced late asthmatic response

Background:  Adenosine receptor activation is suggested to play a role in asthmatic airway inflammation. Inhibition of adenosine receptors may have an effect on the late asthmatic response (LAR) after allergen inhalation and this mechanism could offer a potential new treatment in asthma.
Methods:  We evaluated the effect of an inhaled adenosine-_2A (A_2A)-receptor agonist (GW328267X), 25 μg, in 15 nonsmoking atopic asthmatics who underwent an inhaled allergen challenge following twice daily treatment for 1 week in a double-blind, placebo- and fluticasone propionate (250 μg) controlled study.
Results:  In contrast to fluticasone, treatment with the A_2A-receptor agonist neither significantly protect against the allergen-induced early and late asthmatic reaction, nor the accompanying inflammatory response as measured by sputum total cell counts, number of EG2+ cells, and the concentration of interleukin-8 and eosinophil cationic protein.
Conclusion:  The inhaled A_2A-receptor agonist, GW328267X, 25 μg does not affect the allergen-induced LAR or the associated inflammatory response in asthma.     

Butterbur, a herbal remedy, confers complementary anti-inflammatory activity in asthmatic patients receiving inhaled corticosteroids

BACKGROUND: The effects of butterbur (BB), a herbal remedy, as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids in patients with atopic asthma is currently unknown. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the effects of BB, given as add-on therapy to asthmatic patients maintained on inhaled corticosteroids, assessing adenosine monophosphate (AMP) bronchoprovocation (primary outcome variable) along with other surrogate inflammatory markers such as exhaled nitric oxide, serum eosinophil cationic protein and peripheral blood eosinophil count. METHODS: Sixteen atopic asthmatic patients with mean (standard error of mean) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of 78 (4)% predicted, maintained on their constant dose of inhaled corticosteroids throughout the study, received twice daily for 1 week either BB 25 mg or placebo (PL), in a double-blind, cross-over fashion, with a 1-week washout period prior to each randomized treatment. Measurements were made at baselines prior to each randomized treatment and following the randomized treatment period. RESULTS: Baseline values for the primary and secondary outcomes were not significantly different prior to BB and PL. AMP provocative concentration causing a 20% reduction from baseline FEV1 (PC20) as doubling dilution change from baseline, significantly improved (P<0.05) with BB, 0.6 (0.2), compared with PL, -0.1 (0.3); a 0.7 doubling dilution difference. Exhaled nitric oxide as change from baseline was significantly reduced (P<0.05) with BB, -1.2 (0.8) p.p.b., compared with PL, 0.5 (0.4) p.p.b. Both serum eosinophil cationic protein and peripheral blood eosinophil count as change from baseline were also significantly suppressed (P<0.05) with BB, -3.9 (3.3) microg/L, -31 (28)x106/L compared with PL, 3.3 (2.5) microg/L, 38 (16)x106/L, respectively. CONCLUSION: Chronic dosing with BB conferred complementary anti-inflammatory activity in atopic asthmatic patients maintained on inhaled corticosteroids. Further studies are now required to assess the potential role for BB as either monotherapy in milder patients or add-on therapy in more severe asthmatics.     

Anti-inflammatory effects of once daily low dose inhaled ciclesonide in mild to moderate asthmatic patients

BACKGROUND: Ciclesonide exhibits clinical efficacy at 160 microg (ex-actuator) once daily but the anti-inflammatory effects at this dose are not known. We wished to know whether 4 weeks therapy with ciclesonide pMDI 160 microg once daily in the morning exhibited significant anti-inflammatory effects. METHODS: Seventeen patients with mild persistent asthma (FEV(1) 3.35 l) were recruited into a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized crossover study. Measurements were made after ciclesonide and placebo treatment as well as after run-in and washout periods, for adenosine monophosphate (AMP) bronchial challenge (primary variable), exhaled nitric oxide (NO) and induced sputum (in a subgroup). RESULTS: The mean (SEM) AMP bronchial challenge PC(20) following ciclesonide (140 (63) mg/ml) was significantly (P < 0.001) increased compared with placebo (17 (8) mg/ml), run-in (13 (5) mg/ml) and washout (9 (3) mg/ml) periods. This amounted to an eightfold (CI: 5.3-12.0) for ciclesonide vs placebo. Likewise, there were significant improvements in exhaled NO levels and a significant reduction in induced sputum eosinophil cell counts. CONCLUSION: We have shown that inhaled ciclesonide given at 160 microg once daily in the morning exhibits significant anti-inflammatory effects that are in keeping with the previously described clinical effects.     

Determinants of increased exhaled nitric oxide in patients with suspected asthma

Exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) has been proposed as a marker of asthmatic inflammation, but it is unclear whether FENO in clinical use selects patients primarily according to their atopic or asthmatic status. The aim of this study was to investigate the determinants of increased FENO in patients with suspected asthma, by means of multinomial logistic regression analysis. The FENO of 132 patients referred because of symptoms suggestive of asthma were studied, and the explanatory factors tested included atopy according to prick skin tests, clinical asthma according to lung function tests, sputum eosinophilia and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). Slightly elevated FE(NO) levels were significantly explained only by sputum eosinophilia (OR: 3.7; 95% CI: 1.1-13.1; P=0.04), but for high levels of FE(NO) (> or =3 SD of predicted), clinical asthma (OR: 16.3; 95% CI: 5.4-49.7; P <0.0001) and sputum eosinophilia (OR: 12.0; 95% CI: 4.1-35.0; P >0.0001) were the characteristics with the highest prediction, followed by atopy and BHR. A significant interaction between asthma and atopy was observed relating to the effect on high FENO, but further analyses stratified by atopy showed significant associations between asthma and high FENO both in atopic and nonatopic patients. We conclude that in patients with symptoms suggesting asthma, slightly elevated and high levels of FENO are associated with sputum eosinophilia, whereas asthma is significantly associated only with high levels of FENO, irrespective of atopy. The results suggest that FENO is primarily a marker of airway eosinophilia, and that only high values of FENO may be useful to identify patients with atopic or nonatopic asthma.     

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness to mannitol,airway inflammation and Asthma Control Test in atopic asthmatic children

Introduction

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to mannitol and bronchial inflammation measured as exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and to assess whether asthma control correlates with AHR to mannitol and FeNO in atopic asthmatic children.

Material and methods

Allergy evaluation, the mannitol challenge test, FeNO levels and the Asthma Control Test (ACT) questionnaire were assessed in 40 children with intermittent and mild persistent allergic asthma.

Results

All the subjects showed positive AHR to mannitol. Pearson''s correlation test revealed a significant inverse correlation between AHR (mannitol PD₁₅) and FeNO (p = 0.020). There was also a significant positive correlation between ACT and PD₁₅ (p = 0.020) and a significant negative correlation between ACT and FeNO levels (p = 0.003). The study population was divided into two groups according to FeNO levels (group A ≥ 16 ppb vs. group B < 16 ppb). In group A mannitol PD₁₅ was significantly lower (p = 0.040) and ACT score values were significantly lower (p = 0.001) compared to group B. In group A, the ACT showed that 13.3% of subjects had well-controlled asthma, 80% had partially controlled asthma and 6.7% had uncontrolled asthma. In group B, the ACT showed that 72% of subjects had well-controlled asthma and 28% had partially controlled asthma.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that the degree of AHR to mannitol correlates with the degree of airway inflammation in asthmatic atopic children; moreover, better control of asthma correlates with a lower degree of AHR to both mannitol and FeNO.     

Adherence rate to inhaled corticosteroids and their impact on asthma control

Background:  Poor asthma control is associated to high morbidity. The objective of this study was to assess the association between adherence rates to beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and the degree of asthma control.
Methods:  A cohort concurrent study was carried out for 12 months with 122 asthmatic patients, aged 3–12 years, randomly selected in a pediatric pulmonology outpatient clinic, who received BDP free of charge. Adherence rates were verified by pharmacy records. Clinical control was assessed through a scoring system comprised four variables (nocturnal and morning symptoms, limitation of physical activities and exacerbations). Total score was 16 points. Patients whose score was below or equal to two were considered controlled (group 1), and patients whose score was above or equal to three were considered uncontrolled (group 2). For patients able to perform spirometry, we considered as controlled the patients with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) equal to or above 80% of the predicted value, and as uncontrolled the patients with FEV₁ below 80%.
Results:  Fewer than half (40.3% maximum) of the 122 patients maintained asthma control. Median adherence rate of groups 1 and 2 were 85.5% and 33.8%, ( P  < 0.001) in the 4th month, 90.0% and 48.0% ( P  < 0.001) in the 8th month and 84.4% and 47.0% in the 12th month ( P  < 0.001), respectively.
Conclusion:  In all periods, there were statistically significant differences in adherence rates for maintaining or not maintaining the asthma control. Optimal asthma control entailed adherence rate higher than 80%. Strategies for reducing asthma morbidity should include a regular monitoring of adherence to inhaled steroids.     

Effect of montelukast compared with inhaled fluticasone on airway inflammation

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids are currently regarded as the gold standard in anti-inflammatory therapy, however, leukotriene receptor antagonists have been ascribed anti-inflammatory properties. OBJECTIVE: We directly compared the anti-inflammatory effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP, 100 microg Diskus, twice daily) and oral montelukast (MON 10 mg, nocte) in bronchial biopsies of patients with asthma in a double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group design. METHODS: Bronchial biopsies, serum and urine samples were collected from 36 atopic asthmatics before and after 8 weeks of treatment. Activated T cells (CD25+), eosinophils (MBP+) and mast cells (tryptase+) were analysed by immunohistochemistry. Serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and IL-5 were analysed by radio and enzyme immunoassay (EIA), respectively. Urinary 9alpha-11beta-PGF2 and leukotriene E4 (LTE4) were measured by EIA. RESULTS: A comparison of changes from baseline [FP/MON ratio (95% confidence interval)] of activated T cells was not different when subjects were treated with FP compared to treatment with MON [1.00 (0.18-4.86); P=0.924]. Following treatment, mast cells in the FP group were significantly lower than in the group treated with MON [0.39 (0.16-0.97); P=0.041]. There was no difference in the number of eosinophils in the lamina propria following either treatment [0.54 (0.05-2.57); P=0.263]. However, treatment with FP resulted in a significantly greater decrease in serum ECP, compared to treatment with MON [0.37 (0.25-0.71); P=0.002]. CONCLUSIONS: FP appears to be superior to MON as an anti-inflammatory therapy in mild asthmatics.     

Inhaled corticosteroids decrease vascularity of the bronchial mucosa in patients with asthma

BACKGROUND: Increased vascularity in airway mucosa is a distinctive feature of airway remodelling in asthma. While corticosteroids have proved most effective in modifying airway inflammation, the effect of inhaled corticosteroids on increased airway mucosal vascularity in asthmatics has been little studied. OBJECTIVE: We examined the effect of inhaled corticosteroid on airway vascularity in bronchial biopsy specimens taken from asthmatic patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We studied bronchial biopsies from 28 asthmatic patients before and after treatment with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 800 microg/daily, or placebo, for 6 months in a double-blind manner. Biopsy specimens were evaluated for number of vessels and percentage of area occupied by vessels, using computerized image analysis after staining for type IV collagen in vessel walls. Specimens were also examined for extent of collagen III in the subepithelial basement membrane. In addition, we compared asthmatic specimens with biopsy specimens taken from non-asthmatic control subjects. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in number of vessels (P < 0.01) and percent vascularity (P < 0.001) in the submucosa of asthmatic patients compared with control subjects. After 6 months of treatment, we observed significant improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), FEV1% and airway responsiveness (P < 0.05, each) in the BDP treatment group compared with the placebo group. This was accompanied by significant decreases in both vessel number and percent vascularity in the airways of BDP-treated patients (P < 0.05, each). We also observed a significant correlation between change in percent vascularity and change in collagen III thickness in the BDP-treated patients (rs = 0.90, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the change in percent vascularity was inversely correlated with both FEV1 (rs = -0.49, P < 0.05) and airway responsiveness (rs = -0.36, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that inhaled corticosteroid treatment of asthma reduced airway wall vascularity during airway remodelling.     

Analysis of induced sputum before and after withdrawal of treatment with inhaled corticosteroids in asthmatic patients

To assess whether sputum eosinophilia predicts the recurrence of asthma symptoms after withdrawal of therapy in moderate stable asthmatics on low-dose inhaled corticosteroids. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving 30 subjects with stable asthma, asymptomatic, with low PEF variability measured over two run-in weeks, on treatment with low-dose inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP, 250 microgram b.i.d. in the last 3 months). At the end of the run-in, all patients underwent a methacholine challenge test and sputum induction (T1). They then stopped therapy and received either placebo (20 subjects, study group) or BDP at the same dose as in the previous 3 months (10 subjects, control group). They continued to monitor PEF and symptom score for 3 months, or until asthma symptoms recurred (diurnal and nocturnal symptom score >/=2 on two consecutive days). At the end of the study (T2), i.e., either within 5 days from the beginning of asthma symptoms or after 3 months in subjects without recurrence of asthma symptoms, all subjects repeated the methacholine challenge test and sputum induction. In the placebo-treated group, sputum eosinophils at T1 were significantly higher in subjects who subsequently developed recurrence of asthma symptoms (n = 7) after cessation of treatment than in subjects who remained asymptomatic for 3 months (8.2% [0-56.6] vs 0.9% [0-11], P < 0.05). At the time of recurrence of asthma symptoms, sputum eosinophil percentages significantly increased (from 8.2% [0-56.6] to 16.6% [5.8-73.6], P < 0.05). The positive predictive value of sputum eosinophils for the recurrence of asthma symptoms was 71%, while the negative predicting value was 84%. In the BDP-treated control group, none of the subjects experienced recurrence of asthma symptoms, and sputum eosinophil percentages measured at the beginning (T1) and at the end (T2) of the study were similar. Sputum eosinophil percentages may vary over a wide range in asthmatic subjects, although regularly treated and apparently well controlled. However, high sputum eosinophil percentages are related to early recurrence of asthma symptoms after cessation of inhaled corticosteroids.     

Differential anti-inflammatory effects of large and small particle size inhaled corticosteroids in asthma

BACKGROUND: Extra-fine particle formulations of hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclometasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) exhibit clinical effects comparable with conventional particle formulations of chlorofluorocarbon beclometasone dipropionate (CFC-BDP) at half the dose. There is little data comparing their effects on inflammation. We have evaluated the effects of HFA-BDP and CFC-BDP on pulmonary and systemic markers of asthmatic inflammation. METHODS: A double-blind randomized crossover trial was undertaken comparing the anti-inflammatory effects of HFA-BDP (100 and 400 microg/day) and CFC-BDP (200 and 800 microg/day). Treatment with montelukast was evaluated as add-on to the higher dose of BDP. RESULTS: Compared with baseline after withdrawal of usual asthma therapy, 100 microg of HFA-BDP significantly attenuated serum eosinophilic cationic protein levels (0.61-fold change, 95% CI 0.49-0.77; a 39% reduction, P < 0.001), but 200 microg of CFC-BDP did not (0.87-fold change, 95% CI 0.63-1.23; P = 1). A dose of 800 microg of CFC-BDP and 400 microg of HFA-BDP led to reductions in exhaled nitric oxide (0.57-fold change, 95% CI 0.44-0.73; a 43% reduction, P < 0.001 and 0.65-fold change, 95% CI 0.47-0.91; a 35% reduction, P = 0.008, respectively); and peripheral eosinophils (-74 cells/microl, 95% CI -146 to -2; P = 0.020 and -77 cells/microl, 95% CI -140 to -14; P = 0.012, respectively). Montelukast further reduced exhaled nitric oxide (0.81-fold change, 95% CI 0.66-0.98; P = 0.028) with 400 microg HFA-BDP and eosinophils (-44 cells/microl, 95% CI -80 to -8; P = 0.012) with 800 microg CFC-BDP, but not vice versa. CONCLUSION: Chlorofluorocarbon beclometasone dipropionate and HFA-BDP have differential effects on pulmonary and systemic inflammation, which dictate the additive effects of montelukast.     

Exhaled nitric oxide identifies the persistent eosinophilic phenotype in severe refractory asthma

BACKGROUND: The fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) is increased in asthma, correlates with eosinophilic inflammation, and decreases after steroid therapy. OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine whether persistent eosinophilia would be accompanied by an increased FENO level despite steroid therapy in patients with severe refractory asthma (SRA) as manifestations of steroid resistance. METHODS: Subjects with SRA, subjects with mild-moderate asthma, and healthy control subjects had FENO measured, followed by endobronchial biopsy and bronchoalveolar lavage. Tissue and bronchoalveolar lavage inflammatory cells were assessed for all subjects, and eosinophil status (EOS+/EOS-) was determined for subjects with SRA. RESULTS: Twenty-four subjects with SRA, 15 subjects with moderate-mild asthma, and 17 healthy control subjects were studied. Subjects with EOS+ SRA had significantly higher median FENO levels compared with levels in subjects with EOS- SRA (P = .0084) and all other groups. In subjects with SRA, FENO levels correlated with tissue eosinophils (r(s) = 0.54, P = .007), lymphocytes (r(s) = 0.40, P = .003), and mast cells (r(s) = 0.44, P = .05). FENO levels of greater than 72.9 ppb were associated with a sensitivity of 0.56 and a specificity of 1.0 for EOS+ status in subjects with SRA. CONCLUSION: FENO measurement identified the subgroup of subjects with SRA with persistent eosinophilia despite steroid therapy. Further studies are needed on the use of FENO to monitor response to therapy over time in subjects with SRA.     

Increased carbon monoxide in exhaled air of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Carbon monoxide (CO) can be detected in exhaled air and is increased in asthmatic patients. However, it is uncertain whether exhaled CO is increased in patients with allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: To study whether exhaled CO is increased in patients with allergic rhinitis, exhaled CO concentrations were measured on a CO monitor by vital capacity manoeuvre in 86 patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis during and out of the cedar pollen season. RESULTS: During the season, exhaled CO concentrations were 3. 6 +/- 0.3 p.p.m. and decreased to 1.2 +/- 0.1 p.p.m. out of the season. The values of exhaled CO out of the season were similar to those in age-matched non-smoking healthy control subjects (1.2 +/- 0. 1 p.p.m.). Exhaled CO concentrations were significantly higher in patients with symptoms than in those without symptoms (P < 0.01). Exhaled CO concentrations in patients did not differ significantly among oral and nasal exhalation, and oral exhalation with an expiratory resistance (P > 0.20). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that allergic rhinitis increases the concentration of CO in exhaled air and increases in exhaled CO may be derived from lower airways.     

An economic evaluation of NIOX MINO airway inflammation monitor in the United Kingdom

Background: Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FE_NO), a marker of eosinophilic airway inflammation, is easily measured by noninvasive means. The objective of this study was to determine the cost‐effectiveness of FE_NO measurement using a hand‐held monitor (NIOX MINO), at a reimbursement price of £23, for asthma diagnosis and management in the UK. Methods: We constructed two decision trees to compare FE_NO measurement with standard diagnostic testing and guideline recommendations for management. For asthma diagnosis, we compared FE_NO measurement with lung function and reversibility testing, bronchial provocation and sputum eosinophil count. For asthma management, we evaluated the impact on asthma control, including inhaled corticosteroid use, exacerbations and hospitalizations, of monitoring with FE_NO measurement vs symptoms and lung function as in standard care. Resource use and health outcomes were evaluated over a 1‐year time frame. Direct costs were calculated from a UK health‐care payer perspective (2005 £). Results: An asthma diagnosis using FE_NO measurement cost £43 less per patient as compared with standard diagnostic tests. Asthma management using FE_NO measurement instead of lung function testing resulted in annual cost‐savings of £341 and 0.06 quality‐adjusted life‐years gained for patients with mild to severe asthma and cost‐savings of £554 and 0.004 quality‐adjusted life‐years gained for those with moderate to severe asthma. Conclusions: Asthma diagnosis based on FE_NO measurement with NIOX MINO alone is less costly and more accurate than standard diagnostic methods. Asthma management based on FE_NO measurement is less costly than asthma management based on standard guidelines and provides similar health benefits.