A phase I trial of prolonged oral etoposide and liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian, peritoneal, and tubal carcinoma: a gynecologic oncology group study

OBJECTIVES: In an effort to explore second-line therapy in ovarian, peritoneal, and tubal carcinoma, a phase I trial combining prolonged oral etoposide and liposomal doxorubicin was conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group. METHODS: Liposomal doxorubicin (20 mg/m(2)) was administered intravenously over 1 h followed by oral etoposide at 50 mg/m(2)/day beginning on day 2. In the first phase of accrual, the number of days of oral etoposide was increased until its maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined based on hematologic toxicity. In the second phase, etoposide was given at the MTD while the dose of liposomal doxorubicin was escalated until its maximum tolerated dose was reached based on hematologic or nonhematologic toxicity. Cycles were repeated every 28 days for a maximum of 12 courses. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as neutropenic sepsis, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, absolute neutrophil count <1000/microl or platelets <50,000 during treatment with etoposide, or > or =grade 3 mucositis/stomatitis, palmar-plantar erythrodyesthesia, or rash. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were accrued to the study's first phase, and 3 were accrued to the second phase. Dose-limiting hematologic toxicity occurred with 14 days of oral etoposide in combination with liposomal doxorubicin at 20 mg/m(2). Efforts to escalate the dose of liposomal doxorubicin to 30 mg/m(2) in combination with 12 days of oral etoposide at 50 mg/m(2) resulted in dose-limiting hematologic toxicity. Five of 17 (29%; 95% CI: 13-53%) evaluable patients experienced a response. CONCLUSION: The regimen of oral etoposide at 50 mg/m(2)/day for 12 days in combination with liposomal doxorubicin at a dose of 20 mg/m(2) is tolerable without supportive therapy. While this dose of oral etoposide has demonstrated activity as a single agent in ovarian cancer, liposomal doxorubicin has only been effective in ovarian cancer at higher doses. There are no immediate plans to study this combination further.     

Efficacy and safety of AEZS-108 (INN: Zoptarelin Doxorubicin Acetate) an LHRH agonist linked to doxorubicin in women with platinum refractory or resistant ovarian cancer expressing LHRH receptors: A multicenter Phase II trial of the ago-study group (AGO GYN 5)

Objectives

To evaluate the activity and toxicity of AEZS-108 (Zoptarelin Doxorubicin Acetate) an LHRH agonist linked to doxorubicin in women with platinum refractory or resistant ovarian cancer expressing LHRH receptors.

Methods

Women with epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer, expressing LHRH receptors were eligible for this trial, when they had progression during treatment with a platinum based regimen or within 6 months after receiving a platinum based regimen and a previous taxane treatment. At least one measurable target lesion (RECIST) or CA-125 levels higher than twice the upper limit of normal range (GCIG-criteria) were required. Patients received AEZS-108 (267 mg/m² equimolar to 76.8 mg/m² of free doxorubicin) every 3 weeks as a two hour i.v. infusion.

Results

Fifty-five of 59 (93%) of ovarian cancer samples screened expressed LHRH receptors. 42 patients were enrolled in this study and received at least 1 infusion of AEZS-108 (ITT population). Of these 42 patients 6 (14.3%) had a partial response, 16 (38%) stable disease, 16 (38%) progressive disease and 4 patients were not evaluable. Median time to progression was 12 weeks (95% CI: 8–20 weeks), and median overall survival was 53 weeks (95% CI: 39–73 weeks). Toxicity profile was favorable.

Conclusion

AEZS-108 has a clinical activity in platinum refractory/resistant ovarian cancer which seems to be comparable to that of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin or to topotecan. Toxicity was comparably low. These data support the concept of a targeted chemotherapy for tumors expressing LHRH receptors.     

Phase 2 evaluation of topotecan administered on a 3-day schedule in the treatment of platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer

PURPOSE; The aim of this study was to investigate the toxicity and efficacy of a more convenient topotecan administration schedule (in contrast to the "standard" 1.5 mg/m(2)/day x 5 days q 21 days) in the management of platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients with clinically defined platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer participating in this phase 2 trial conducted by the Gynecologic Cancer Program of the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center received topotecan at a dose of 1.5 mg/m(2)/day x 3 days on a 21-day schedule. Both dose escalations and reductions were permitted in the protocol design. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients (median age: 61; range: 43-80) were treated with this modified topotecan schedule. These individuals had received a median of two prior regimens (range: 1-4) (retreatment with a platinum agent or paclitaxel considered a single regimen). The median number of topotecan courses delivered was 3 (range: 1-7). Major toxicity included grade 4 neutropenia (24% of patients); neutropenic fever (10%); grade 3 thrombocytopenia (10%); and requirement for blood transfusion (14%). Dose escalation was possible, and dose reductions required, in 14 and 28% of patients, respectively. Two patients exhibited evidence of a clinically relevant response to treatment. CONCLUSION: This 3-day topotecan program is more convenient and less toxic than the standard 5-day regimen. The limited level of activity observed is not inconsistent with that previously reported for the 5-day topotecan infusion schedule in platinum/paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer. Further investigation will be required to document the clinical utility of a 3-day topotecan schedule in a less heavily pretreated and more chemosensitive patient population.     

A Phase I Study of Paclitaxel, Doxorubicin, and Cisplatin in Patients with Previously Untreated Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Objective.Although doxorubicin is not currently popular as a primary agent in ovarian cancer, overviews of previous studies suggest that the inclusion of doxorubicin may have improved outcome. The purpose of this phase I study was to determine the maximal dose of doxorubicin that could be added to standard doses of paclitaxel and cisplatin with G-CSF support.Methods.Women with FIGO stage III or IV epithelial ovarian cancer were primarily treated with escalating doses of doxorubicin in combination with paclitaxel (135 mg/m²over 24 h) and cisplatin (75 mg/m²) every 3 weeks. Doxorubicin was started at 30 mg/m²and escalated by 10 mg/m²per treatment level. All patients received G-CSF support.Results.Eleven patients were treated at two dose levels. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was reached at the 40 mg/m²dose of doxorubicin. All patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia although none required hospitalization. DLT included renal toxicity and prolonged thrombocytopenia. Despite vigorous antiemetic regimens 60% of patients experienced severe nausea and vomiting. Nine patients were assessable for response. Eight patients have had a complete clinical response (89%). Of the five patients undergoing second-look laparotomy two were negative.Conclusions.The maximum tolerated dose of doxorubicin in this three-drug regimen is 30 mg/m²with standard doses of paclitaxel and cisplatin. Hematologic toxicity is manageable using G-CSF. Doxorubicin appears to increase the renal toxicity of cisplatin which may be exaggerated by marked nausea and vomiting. This is an active but toxic regimen and alternative sequences and strategies should be evaluated.     

Phase I trial of escalating doses of topotecan in combination with a fixed dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in women with müllerian malignancies

Background. Topotecan and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) interact with topoisomerase I and II (topo I and II), respectively, with schedule dependent, and potentially synergistic cytotoxicity.Objectives. Define dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan delivered by 72-h infusion administered immediately after Doxil delivered at a fixed dose (30 mg/m²) in a cohort of women with recurrent müllerian malignancies.Methods. Topotecan dose was escalated from 0.5 mg/m²/day for 3 days in 0.2 mg/m²/day increments with treatment repeated every 21 days. Eligibility criteria required ECOG ≤2 and no more than four prior lines of chemotherapy. No dose reductions were allowed in the first two cycles to allow evaluation of cutaneous toxicity.Results. Between November 2000 and August 2002, 18 patients were enrolled. Median age 59 (40–71) years. Patients received a median 1 (1–6) cycles of chemotherapy, with 39 cycles of treatment delivered at DL 1. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 12 for response. At dose level 2, dose-limiting toxicity consisted of nausea and vomiting, mucositis, cutaneous toxicity, and neutropenia. There was no clinically significant cardiac toxicity. There were no radiologically confirmed partial responses.Conclusions. Doxil 30 mg/m² and topotecan 0.5 mg/m²/day by 72-h infusion (total dose 1.5 mg/m²), although a rational combination of cytotoxic therapies, have limited clinical activity.     

A phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin oxaliplatin and cyclophosphamide as second-line treatment in relapsed ovarian carcinoma

Abstract.   Valerio MR, Tagliaferri P, Raspagliesi F, Fulfaro F, Badalamenti G, Arcara C, Cicero G, Russo A, Venuta S, Guarneri G, Gebbia N. A phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin oxaliplatin and cyclophosphamide as second-line treatment in relapsed ovarian carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006; 16(Suppl. 1): 79–85
We carried out a phase II nonrandomized study to examine the level of activity of oxaliplatin, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide in a patient population with relapsed ovarian cancer pretreated with platinum derivatives and paclitaxel. Patients received oxaliplatin (85 mg/m²), pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (30 mg/m²), and cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m²). A total of 49 patients (39 assessable for toxicity and response) were enrolled in this trial. Neutropenia grade 3 was observed in six patients (15%) and anemia grade 3 in one patient (0.2%). Fatigue grade 1–2 occurred in 26 patients (66%), nausea/vomiting grade 1 in 23 patients (58%), and alopecia grade 1–2 in 19 patients (48%). Twenty-one (53%) patients experienced grade 1–2 peripheral neuropathy. The overall response rate was 46% (95% CI 23.6–68.7). Median progression-free survival was 28 weeks (range 12–52 weeks) and median survival was 45 weeks (range 26–136+ weeks). The mean duration of response was 34 weeks (range 16–52 weeks). In platinum-resistant and -refractory ovarian cancer patients, the overall response rate was 37% (CI 95% 14.4–60.8) with a progression-free survival of 28 weeks (range 12–52 weeks) and a median survival of 42 weeks (range 28–84 weeks). This combination chemotherapy is generally well tolerated and is an active second-line regimen against ovarian cancer.     

Combined PEG liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine are active and have acceptable toxicity in patients with platinum-refractory and -resistant ovarian cancer after previous platinum-taxane therapy: a phase II Austrian AGO study

OBJECTIVES: Platinum resistance is a significant problem in patients with ovarian cancer. The aim of this phase II study was to define the response rates, the progression-free survival and the toxicity profile of the combination of PEG liposomal doxorubicin (L-DXR) and gemcitabine (GEM). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty one patients with histologically confirmed platinum-refractory or -resistant epithelial ovarian cancer were scheduled to receive 6 cycles of L-DXR 30 mg/m(2) on day 1 as well as GEM 650 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 28 days. RESULTS: The median number of chemotherapy cycles given was 4. The mean dose intensity for L-DXR and GEM on day 1 was 96% and 97%, respectively. The mean dose intensity for GEM on day 8 was 93%. The overall response rate was 33% (10 of 30 evaluable patients; 20% complete responses). The median progression-free survival was 3.8 months, and the median overall survival was 15.8 months, respectively. Toxicity was acceptable. One quarter of patients developed grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, but none developed febrile neutropenia. Palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) grades 2 and 3 occurred in 13% and 3% only, respectively, and no grade 4 PPE was observed. Grades 1 to 3 stomatitis was found in 58% of patients (10% grade 3). CONCLUSION: The combination of L-DXR and GEM is an active and acceptably tolerated option in the treatment of patients with platinum-resistant and -refractory ovarian cancer. Dose reductions seem advisable in the case of > or =grade 2 stomatitis and/or PPE > or =grade 2.     

Phase II study of the combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and topotecan in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

The combination of liposomal doxorubicin and topotecan was evaluated in a phase II study in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Twenty-seven patients received liposomal doxorubicin (30 mg/m(2)) infused at day 1, followed by topotecan (1 mg/m(2)) infusion daily for 5 days. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. This combination regimen showed an overall response rate of 28%. Median time to progression was 30 weeks, with a median overall survival of 40 weeks. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was shown in 70% of patients and grade 3/4 thrombopenia in 41% of patients. Neutropenic fever was reported in 11% of patients. After reviewing the first 12 patients, the internal review board decided to administer topotecan at a dose of 0.75 mg/m(2) and liposomal doxorubicin at 40 mg/m(2) for the remainder of the study. However, this adjustment did not lead to reduction in bone marrow toxicity nor to an improvement in dose intensity. Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia and mucositis were more reported in the second cohort but usually mild. The combination of liposomal doxorubicin and topotecan demonstrates favorable response data in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. However, substantial bone marrow toxicity limits further clinical use.     

Paclitaxel, carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma: a phase I study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group

PURPOSE: Based on the activity and tolerability of liposomal doxorubicin in platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian carcinoma, we conducted a phase I trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with paclitaxel and carboplatin to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in chemotherapy naive ovarian, peritoneal and tubal carcinoma patients. METHODS: Three schedules were studied: paclitaxel, carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin every 28 days; paclitaxel and carboplatin every 21 days with liposomal doxorubicin every 42 days; and weekly paclitaxel, carboplatin (AUC=5) every 21 days and liposomal doxorubicin every 42 days. The paclitaxel dose was 175 mg/m(2) over 3 h on an every 3-4 week schedule and 60 mg/m(2) when administered weekly. Based on the frequency of neutropenic sepsis, grade 4 thrombocytopenia and > or =grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity, the starting dose of liposomal doxorubicin of 20 mg/m(2) was escalated to determine the MTD. RESULTS: A total of 210 (21-day) cycles were administered to 37 patients. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred when liposomal doxorubicin was administered at 40 mg/m(2). Because of treatment-related delays resulting in decreased paclitaxel/carboplatin dose intensity, administration was modified to be given every 21 days, with liposomal doxorubicin given every 42 days. Since neutropenia was the DLT of this schedule, the schema was further modified to administer paclitaxel weekly; however, weekly administration was inconsistent because of toxicity. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2), carboplatin (AUC=5) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m(2) are tolerable without supportive therapy. The usual dose intensity of paclitaxel/carboplatin was maintained by administering liposomal doxorubicin every other cycle.     

A Phase I/II Study of Topotecan in Combination with Carboplatin in Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Objective.The purpose of this study was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan given as escalating doses combined to a fixed dosage of carboplatin in late relapsing ovarian carcinomas.Methods. Women with relapsing ovarian cancer more than 6 months after first-line treatment were eligible for the study. In the first phase of the trial, patients were allocated to escalating topotecan doses with a carboplatin fixed dose (AUC 5, according to Cockcroft's formula). If no “severe” adverse event occurred in 1 or more of the patients, the topotecan dose was increased. The starting dose of topotecan was 0.50 mg/m²/day, for 3 consecutive days, and the dose step was of 0.25 mg/m²/day, till 1.5 mg/m²/day. The study progressed then in a phase II trial.Results. A total of 39 patients entered the trial. Twenty took part in the escalating topotecan dose phase (4 per dose level, 0.50, 0.75, 1, 1.25, and 1.50 mg/m²/day) and 19 in the phase II. No severe adverse event was observed in the phase I of the trial, so the MTD was not reached. In the phase II trial topotecan was given to 1 mg/m²/day. Overall grade 3–4 neutropenia, lasting 7 days or less, was observed in 58.9% (23 patients). Thrombocytopenia occurred in 30.8% (12 patients) and grade 3 anemia in 25.6% (10 patients) of subjects. No life-threatening event occurred. Platelets or red blood cell transfusions were given in three cases (7.8%).Conclusions. This daily-times-3-day schedule of topotecan in combination with carboplatin is safe.     

Prospective treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma with cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide

Both single-agent cisplatin and the combination of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide demonstrated moderate activity against endometrial carcinoma in earlier salvage trials. Since January 1979, 102 patients with advanced primary (n = 42) or recurrent (n = 60) endometrial carcinoma were prospectively treated with cisplatin (50 mg/m²), doxorubicin (50 mg/m²), and cyclophos-phamide (500 mg/m²) (PAC). PAC was administered monthly until disease progression or toxicity precluded additional therapy. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles (range 1–13). Of the 87 patients with measurable disease, 12 had a complete clinical response, while 27 had a partial clinical response, for an overall objective response rate of 45%. No differences in response rates between primary and recurrent disease patients were noted. Median time to response was 2.5 months with a median response duration of 4.8 months. Nonresponders included 33 patients with stable disease and 15 with progression. Median progression-free survival for all patients was 6 months. Dose escalation was possible in 25% of patients; however, 52% of patients required dose reductions during treatment. Clinically significant toxicities included neutropenia (65%), anemia (47%), emesis (21%), nephrotoxicity (17%), and neurotoxicity (4%). Our study indicates that endometrial cancer is significantly responsive to PAC. Enthusiasm for this regimen should be tempered by the limited duration of response and substantial treatment toxicity.     

Non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (NPLD,Myocet®) + carboplatin in patients with platinum sensitive ovarian cancers: A ARCAGY-GINECO phase IB-II trial

Background

Carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin combination is a standard regimen in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients. The pegylated liposomal doxorubicin shortage from 2011 to 2013 urged assessment of the efficacy and tolerance of non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with carboplatin.

High-Dose Platinum versus Standard Dose in Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma: A Randomized Trial from the Gynecologic Cooperative Group of the French Comprehensive Cancer Centers (FNCLCC)

Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of platinum dose intensity on pathological response rate and overall survival in patients with advanced ovarian adenocarcinoma.Methods. Between February 1992 and December 1996, 195 previously untreated patients with FIGO stage IIb-c, IIIb-c, or IV with macroscopic residual disease after suboptimal debulking surgery were randomized to receive CCC (100 mg/m² of cisplatin, 300 mg/m² of cyclophosphamide, 300 mg/m² of carboplatin, n = 96) or CC (100 mg/m² of cisplatin, 600 mg/m² of cyclophosphamide, n = 99) for six courses at 28-day intervals. A second-look laparotomy was planned at the end of chemotherapy.Results. In the CCC arm, the platinum compound received dose intensity and relative total dose were 85 and 76%; in the CC arm, they were 94 and 85%. Grade 3–4 toxicity was more frequent in the CCC arm than in the CC arm for leukopenia (56% vs 26%, P < 0.001), febrile neutropenia (18% vs 4%, P = 0.002), anemia (31% vs 5%, P < 0.001), thrombopenia (55% vs 4%, P < 0.001), and ototoxicity (8% vs 0%, P < 0.001). The pathologic complete response rate was 22 and 14% in the CCC and CC arms, respectively (P = 0.19). With a median follow-up of 53 months, the median time to failure and the 3-year treatment failure-free survival rate were 17.4 months and 22% vs 13 months and 11% in the two arms, respectively (P = 0.01). The median survival time and the 3-year overall survival rate were, respectively, 30 months and 42% vs 25 months and 33% (P < 0.20).Conclusion. The platinum dose intensification (1.6-fold increase) obtained with the CCC association improves the treatment failure-free survival without significant impact on overall survival when compared with the CC regimen in suboptimal debulked ovarian adenocarcinoma. However, because of its high rate of hematologic toxicity and ototoxicity, this association cannot be recommended for routine practice.     

In VivoStudies of Adenovirus-Based p53 Gene Therapy for Ovarian Cancer

Objectives.To test the safety, efficacy, and toxicity of gene therapy using wild-type p53-expressing adenovirus (Ad-CMV-p53) in a nude mouse model with intraperitoneal (ip) 2774 human ovarian cancer cell line that contains a p53 mutation.Study design.An initial study of adenovirus tolerance was determined in nude mice by a single ip injection of increasing doses of Ad-CMV-p53. Nude mice were implanted with an LD₁₀₀dose of 1 × 10⁷cells. To study the efficacy and specificity of Ad-CMV-p53 treatment, the mice received treatment with different adenovirus constructs. One group received Ad-CMV-p53 and another group received a control adenovirus construct, Ad-CMV-βgal. To study the treatment response to Ad-CMV-p53, the mice were divided into groups and received various treatment schedules of 1 × 10⁸pfu of Ad-CMV-p53.Results.The mice tolerated Ad-CMV-p53 without adverse effects at doses of 1 × 10⁸pfu. The response to Ad-CMV-p53 showed significant survival duration in each dose regimen, with a survival time greater than that of untreated animals (P= 0.0173). However, no statistically significant survival advantage was observed between Ad-CMV-p53- and Ad-CMV-βgal-treated mice.Conclusions.These studies show that at the adenovirus dose and administration regimen used, there is effective but not specific 2774 tumor growth inhibitionin vivo.Efficient introduction of biologically active genes into tumor cells would greatly facilitate cancer therapy. Thus, although promising, these results caution that much effort will be required to realize the potential for clinical application of adenovirus-based ovarian cancer gene therapy.     

Phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and oxaliplatin in relapsed advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) 30 to 35 mg/m(2) plus oxaliplatin 70 mg/m(2) every 28 days in women with advanced ovarian cancer that recurred or progressed after a platinum-based regimen. METHODS: 43 women received a median of 6 courses of treatment. RESULTS: Objective response was 54% in the evaluable population and was higher in women with platinum-sensitive (67%) compared with platinum-resistant disease (29%). At a median duration of follow-up of 15.5 months, median overall survival was 15.8 months and time to tumor progression 7.3 months. Most toxicity was no greater than grade 1 or 2. There was no grade 3 or 4 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia. After 264 cycles administered, neutropenia was the most common cause of severe toxicity and required one patient to withdraw from the study. No cardiotoxicity was reported. CONCLUSION: PLD plus oxaliplatin is active and well tolerated in women with relapsed advanced ovarian cancer, regardless of platinum sensitivity.     

Phase II Study of 96-hr Continuous-Infusion Etoposide and Doxorubicin with Bolus Cyclophosphamide in Refractory Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Effective salvage chemotherapy for patients with ovarian cancer who have failed platinum- and taxane-based regimens has not been identified. It has been reported that prolonged infusions of chemotherapy may be active in some malignancies which have become refractory to bolus treatments. We evaluated a regimen of 96-hr continuous-infusion doxorubicin (10 mg/m²/24 hr), etoposide (50 mg/m²/24 hr), and bolus cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m²) administered every 21 days to patients with ovarian cancer who had previously been treated with paclitaxel and a platinum compound. Nineteen women were treated, 15 of whom had platinum-refractory cancer. Six of the first 9 experienced a neutropenic fever after the first treatment cycle, and therefore all subsequent patients received prophylactic granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor. Other significant toxicities included hand and foot syndrome (1 patient) and mucositis (4 patients). There was one partial response in a patient with platinum-sensitive disease. We conclude that this regimen causes significant myelosuppression and does not have major activity in heavily pretreated patients with ovarian cancer.     

Liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian, peritoneal, and tubal carcinoma: a retrospective comparative study of single-agent dosages

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative activity and tolerance of liposomal doxorubicin in recurrent ovarian, peritoneal, and tubal carcinoma at an initial dose of 40 or 50 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks. METHODS: A retrospective single-institution study was performed on patients who received liposomal doxorubicin from 1/97 to 12/00. Demographic data, liposomal doxorubicin dose, dose reductions, response, and progression-free and overall survival were recorded. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients, 38 treated at 40 mg/m(2) and 40 treated at 50 mg/m(2), were identified. There was no difference with respect to patient age, performance status, percentage of patients who were platinum resistant or paclitaxel resistant, or tumor bulk. The response rate in this highly resistant population was 13.5 and 7.7% for liposomal doxorubicin at 40 and 50 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks, respectively. Stable disease was observed in 49 and 51% of patients treated with liposomal doxorubicin at a dose of 40 and 50 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks, respectively. The progression-free survival for patients with responding and stable disease was similar. Dose reductions were required in 27.5% of patients treated at 50 mg/m(2) versus no patients treated at 40 mg/m(2) (P < 0.001). Treatment delays due to toxicity were required in 32.5% of patients treated at 50 mg/m(2) versus 16% of patients treated at 40 mg/m(2) (P = 0.14). CONCLUSION: Liposomal doxorubicin at a dose of 40 mg/m(2) appears to be as active as liposomal doxorubicin at a dose of 50 mg/m(2) in ovarian, peritoneal, and tubal carcinoma and is better tolerated based on the frequency of dose reductions and treatment delays.     

Evaluation of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) as second-line chemotherapy of squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a phase II study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group

OBJECTIVE: Doxorubicin has reported activity in advanced and recurrent cervical cancer but hematologic toxicity has limited its use in some combinations. To determine the level of activity and potential for use in future combinations, a phase II trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin as second-line therapy in advanced and recurrent cervical cancer was performed. METHODS: Eligible patients had squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix, measurable disease, one prior chemotherapy regimen which did not include an anthracycline, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 1500/microl, platelet count > 100,000/microl, and adequate hepatic function. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m(2) was administered intravenously over 1 h every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were entered on this study. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 26 were evaluable for response. A median of 2 courses of therapy (range 1-10) was given. No grade 4 toxicities were noted. Three patients (11.1%) had partial responses. CONCLUSION: Liposomal doxorubicin has limited activity, at the dose and schedule employed in previously-treated cervical cancer.     

Prophylactic Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Allows Escalation of Chemotherapeutic Dose Intensity in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Background: In an effort to discover an effective regimen for use in Phase III evaluation of the efficacy of dose intensification in advanced ovarian cancer, we performed a Phase II trial of dose intensified cisplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Methods: Thirty patients with primary, FIGO Stage 3 or 4, epithelial ovarian cancer underwent intensified cytoreduction followed by cisplatin 105 mg/m², etoposide 300 mg/m²and ifosfamide/mesna 3 g/m², q 28 days × 6 cycles with G-CSF 5 μg/kg q day for 7 days. The dose of etoposide and ifosfamide was escalated 20% in cohorts of three patients. Results: Intensified cytoreductive surgery was successful in resecting all gross tumor in 24 patients (80%). At the original dose of cisplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide without G-CSF, 55% of cycles resulted in neutropenia and 38% in thrombocytopenia (dose INTENSITY = 0.8). With the addition of G-CSF, neutropenia developed in 5% of cycles and thrombocytopenia in 38%. At a 20% escalation of etoposide and ifosfamide, neutropenia developed in 17% of cycles and thrombocytopenia in 50% (dose INTENSITY = 1.2). At a 40% escalation of etoposide and ifosfamide, neutropenia developed in 33% of cycles and thrombocytopenia in 83%, which was dose limiting. The remaining 18 patients were treated at a 20% escalation and neutropenia developed in 14% of cycles and thrombocytopenia in 36%. CA125 response was 73%. At a 4.1-year median follow-up, median progression-free survival was 2.6 years and median survival was 3.0 years. Conclusion: In 30 women with primary advanced ovarian cancer, G-CSF allowed a 50% dose escalation of etoposide and ifosfamide from 0.8 to 1.2 dose intensity. The maximum tolerated dose of this regimen is cisplatin 105 mg/m², etoposide 360 mg/m², and ifosfamide 3.6 g/m²with G-CSF.     

Weekly paclitaxel in heavily pretreated ovarian cancer patients: does this treatment still provide further advantages?

Objective

To evaluate the disease control rate (DCR) in heavily pretreated and relapsed ovarian cancer patients re-challenged with a weekly paclitaxel schedule and to establish whether a correlation between dose intensity, progression-free interval (PFI) and overall survival (OS) exists.

Methods

Retrospective data were collected from 30 heavily pretreated metastatic ovarian cancer patients who received 80?mg/m²/week paclitaxel regimen.

Results

The treatment was well tolerated and showed a DCR in 70% of the patients, with only one case of grade 3 hematological toxicity. One patient (3%) showed a complete response, 15 patients (50%) a partial response and five patients (17%) a stabilization of their disease. The regimen was mostly used as a fourth-line chemotherapy (range 2?C7). The median dose intensity in responding patients was 57.5?mg/m²/week and in those with progressive disease 49.7?mg/m²/week. (p?=?0.20). PFI and OS were increased in the responder patient groups with a log-rank test of 25.64 (p?<?0.001) and 15.10 (p?=?0.0001), respectively.

Conclusions

Weekly administration of paclitaxel was active and well tolerated as a salvage therapy for heavily pretreated ovarian cancer patients.