Azacitidine improves outcome in higher‐risk MDS patients with chromosome 7 abnormalities: a retrospective comparison of GESMD and GFM registries

Treatment with azacitidine (AZA) has been suggested to be of benefit for higher‐risk myelodysplastic syndrome (HR‐MDS) patients with chromosome 7 abnormalities (Abn 7). This retrospective study of 235 HR‐MDS patients with Abn 7 treated with AZA (n = 115) versus best supportive care (BSC; n = 120), assessed AZA treatment as a time‐varying variable in multivariable analysis. A Cox Regression model with time‐interaction terms of overall survival (OS) at different time points confirmed that, while chromosome 7 cytogenetic categories (complex karyotype [CK] versus non‐CK) and International Prognostic Scoring System risk (high versus intermediate‐2) retained poor prognosis over time, AZA treatment had a favourable impact on OS during the first 3 years of treatment compared to BSC (Hazard ratio [HR] 0·5 P < 0·001 at 1 year, 0·7 P = 0·019 at 2 years; 0·73 P = 0·029 at 3 years). This benefit was present in all chromosome 7 categories, but tended to be greater in patients with CK (risk reduction of 82%, 68% and 53% at 1, 3 and 6 months in CK patients; 79% at 1 month in non‐CK patients, P < 0·05 for all). AZA also significantly improved progression‐free survival (P < 0·01). This study confirms a time‐dependent benefit of AZA on outcome in patients with HR‐MDS and cytogenetic abnormalities involving chromosome 7, especially for those with CK.     

Platelet doubling after the first azacitidine cycle is a promising predictor for response in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients in the Dutch azacitidine compassionate named patient programme

The efficacy of azacitidine in the treatment of high‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) (20–30% blasts) has been demonstrated. To investigate the efficacy of azacitidine in daily clinical practice and to identify predictors for response, we analysed a cohort of 90 MDS, CMML and AML patients who have been treated in a Dutch compassionate named patient programme. Patients received azacitidine for a median of five cycles (range 1–19). The overall response rate (complete/partial/haematological improvement) was 57% in low risk MDS, 53% in high risk MDS, 50% in CMML, and 39% in AML patients. Median overall survival (OS) was 13·0 (9·8–16·2) months. Multivariate analysis confirmed circulating blasts [Hazard Ratio (HR) 0·48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·24–0·99; P = 0·05] and poor risk cytogenetics (HR 0·45, 95% CI 0·22–0·91; P = 0·03) as independent predictors for OS. Interestingly, this analysis also identified platelet doubling after the first cycle of azacitidine as a simple and independent positive predictor for OS (HR 5·4, 95% CI 0·73–39·9; P = 0·10). In conclusion, routine administration of azacitidine to patients with variable risk groups of MDS, CMML and AML is feasible, and subgroups with distinct efficacy of azacitidine treatment can be identified.     

Azacitidine in untreated acute myeloid leukemia: A report on 149 patients

Limited data are available on azacitidine (AZA) treatment and its prognostic factors in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). One hundred and forty‐nine previously untreated AML patients considered ineligible for intensive chemotherapy received AZA in a compassionate patient‐named program. AML diagnosis was de novo, post‐myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), post‐MPN, and therapy‐related AML in 51, 55, 13, and 30 patients, respectively. Median age was 74 years, median white blood cell count (WBC) was 3.2 × 10⁹/L and 58% of the patients had ≥30% marrow blasts. Cytogenetics was adverse in 60 patients. Patients received AZA for a median of five cycles (range 1–31). Response rate (including complete remission/CR with incomplete recovery/partial remission) was 27.5% after a median of three cycles (initial response), and 33% at any time (best response). Only adverse cytogenetics predicted poorer response. Median overall survival (OS) was 9.4 months. Two‐year OS was 51% in responders and 10% in non‐responders (P<0.0001). Adverse cytogenetics, WBC >15 × 10⁹/L and ECOG‐PS ≥2 predicted poorer OS, while age and marrow blast percentage had no impact. Using MDS IWG 2006 response criteria, among patients with stable disease, those with hematological improvement had no significant survival benefit in a 7 months landmark analysis. Outcomes observed in this high‐risk AML population treated with AZA deserve comparison with those of patients treated intensively in prospective studies. Am. J. Hematol. 89:410–416, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Azacitidine and low‐dose cytarabine in palliative patients with acute myeloid leukemia and high bone marrow blast counts – a retrospective single‐center experience

We retrospectively analyzed and compared the efficacy and toxicity of azacitidine (AZA) and low‐dose cytarabine (LD‐Ara‐C) in 65 palliative patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) showing high bone marrow blast counts (≥30%) before start of treatment. Twenty‐seven and 38 patients received AZA and LD‐Ara‐C, respectively. The median patient age was 71 yr. Patient and disease characteristics did not differ between the treatment groups, except for BM blast counts, and peripheral leukocyte and blast counts which were significantly higher in the LD‐Ara‐C group. AZA and LD‐Ara‐C were first‐line treatment in 12 (44%) and 17 patients (45%), respectively. Response and hematologic improvement rates were low and similar in both treatment groups. In both treatment groups, most common non‐hematologic toxicities included febrile neutropenia, pneumonia, and bleedings without significant differences regarding frequencies. Estimated 1‐yr survival rates were 15% (95% CI 8–22) and 13% (95% CI 7–19) in the AZA and LD‐Ara‐C groups, respectively, without statistically significant difference. In multivariate analysis (n = 65), previous treatment (HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.00–5.22, P = 0.05) and adverse cytogenetics (HR 2.50, 95% CI 1.20–5.22, P = 0.02) were independent predictors of poor survival. In our center and within the limitations of a retrospective study, both treatment regimens showed similar but limited efficacy in palliative patients with AML and high BM blast counts.     

Bone marrow hypocellularity does not affect tolerance or efficacy of azacitidine in patients with higher‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes

The efficacy and tolerance of azacitidine in higher‐risk myelodysplasia with hypocellular bone marrow (BM) are unknown. This post hoc AZA‐001 trial analysis assessed whether baseline BM cellularity affected the overall survival (OS) advantage demonstrated with azacitidine versus conventional care regimens (CCR). Baseline BM biopsies of <30% cellularity were considered hypocellular with data evaluable from 299 patients (azacitidine n = 154, CCR n = 145); 13% (n = 39) hypocellular, 87% (n = 260) non‐hypocellular. Patient characteristics were balanced between cellularity and treatment groups. Most patients (90–100%) had 2–3 cytopenias at baseline. Median (range) azacitidine treatment cycle lengths were 35·5 (28–54) and 33·0 (15–75) d in hypocellular and non‐hypocellular groups, respectively. At 33 months, median OS was not reached (NR) [95% confidence interval (CI): 19·2, NR] in hypocellular patients receiving azacitidine versus 16·9 months (95% CI: 11·1, 19·3) with CCR (P = 0·001); and in non‐hypocellular patients, it was 21·1 months (95% CI: 16·2, 34·7) versus 15·3 months (95% CI: 9·3, 17·6) (P = 0·012). Azacitidine tolerance was similar regardless of cellularity. Grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia occurred similarly in hypocellular patients treated with azacitidine versus CCR (80% vs. 92% and 88% vs. 75%). Azacitidine OS results are consistent with those from AZA‐001, regardless of cellularity, and demonstrate its safety and efficacy in higher‐risk myelodysplasia with hypocellular BM.     

A phase 2 trial of high dose lenalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory higher‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukaemia with trilineage dysplasia

Limited therapies exist for patients with refractory and relapsed (RR ) higher‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR ‐MDS ) and acute myeloid leukaemia with trilineage dysplasia (AML ‐TD ). High dose (HD ) lenalidomide (50 mg) has activity as frontline therapy in elderly AML but there is limited data in the RR setting. This phase II trial included patients with RR HR ‐MDS or AML ‐TD at 2 doses of lenalidomide (15 or 50 mg) on days 1–28 of 42‐day cycles. The primary endpoint was response rate using the 2006 International Working Group criteria. Overall survival (OS ) was estimated by Kaplan–Meier methods. Of 27 patients enrolled, 59% had HR ‐MDS and 31% AML ‐TD . No patient had isolated del5q; 41% had poor‐risk karyotype. Of 9 patients treated at 15 mg, 56% completed ≥2 cycles with no responses. Of 18 patients treated at 50 mg, 39% completed ≥2 cycles and 11% responded but all experienced grade 3/4 neutropenic fever/infection. The 60‐day mortality rate was 30%. Median OS was 114 days with 19% surviving ≥1 year. The study was terminated due to lack of robust clinical activity. In conclusion, lenalidomide at 15 mg is ineffective in RR myeloid malignancies. Continous high dosing schedules are poorly tolerated and minimally active. Further evaluation should be considered in upfront intensive chemotherapy‐ineligible patients.     

Rituximab plus hyper‐CVAD alternating with MTX/Ara‐C in patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma: 15‐year follow‐up of a phase II study from the MD Anderson Cancer Center

Intensive chemotherapy regimens containing cytarabine have substantially improved remission durability and overall survival in younger adults with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). However, there have been no long‐term follow‐up results for patients treated with these regimens. We present long‐term survival outcomes from a pivotal phase II trial of rituximab, hyper‐fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone alternating with methotrexate and cytarabine (R‐HCVAD/MA) . At 15 years of follow‐up (median: 13·4 years), the median failure‐free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) for all patients was 4·8 years and 10·7 years, respectively. The FFS seems to have plateaued after 10 years, with an estimated 15‐year FFS of 30% in younger patients (≤65 years). Patients who achieved complete response (CR) after 2 cycles had a favourable median FFS of 8·8 years. Six patients developed myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukaemia (MDS/AML) whilst in first CR. The 10‐year cumulative incidence of MDS/AML of patients in first remission was 6·2% (95% confidence interval: 2·5–12·2%). In patients with newly diagnosed MCL, R‐HCVAD/MA showed sustained efficacy, with a median OS exceeding 10 years in all patients and freedom from disease recurrence of nearly 15 years in almost one‐third of the younger patients (≤65 years).     

Efficacy and safety of a 5‐day regimen of azacitidine for patients with high‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes

Although a 7‐day (d) regimen of azacitidine (AZA) is the standard treatment of high‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), AZA is difficult to administer during weekends in an outpatient setting. We retrospectively investigated the outcome of a 5‐d regimen of AZA in patients with high‐risk MDS. High‐risk MDS was defined as MDS with intermediate‐2‐ or high‐risk MDS according to the International Prognostic Scoring System. Every months AZA was given at 75 mg/m² per day for 5–7 d in hospital for first cycle and 5 d in outpatient for second cycle and later. Between April 2011 and December 2013, AZA treatment was initiated in 25 patients (men, 22; women, 3; median age, 75 yr; age range, 59–86 yr). The median number of AZA cycles was 10 (range, 1–24). Twenty patients received more than three cycles of AZA and 13 (52%) achieved any hematological improvement (HI). The median time to first response was two cycles (1–3). The most common non‐hematological adverse events were neutropenia in 21 patients and thrombocytopenia in 17 patients. Nineteen patients died. The main cause of death was disease progression (five patients) and infectious complications (11 patients). The median overall survival was 13.2 months. The 5‐d AZA regimen showed a good continuation rate of more than three cycles and an equivalent HI with the 7‐d regimen.     

Azacitidine with or without Entinostat for the treatment of therapy‐related myeloid neoplasm: further results of the E1905 North American Leukemia Intergroup study

Therapy‐related myeloid neoplasms (tMN) are serious late effects of the treatment of cancer with poor response to conventional treatment. Azacitidine (AZA) has been used to treat patients with tMN but current data are retrospective. We present here 47 tMN patients prospectively enrolled as a specific cohort in the E1905 study. The E1905 study was a randomized phase 2 study (NCT00313586) testing 10 d of AZA (50 mg/m²/d) +/? the histone deacetylase inhibitor entinostat (4 mg/m²/d PO day‐3 and day‐10). A total of 47 patients [29 therapy‐related myelosyspastic syndrome (t‐MDS) and 18 therapy‐related acute myeloid leukaemia (t‐AML)] were recruited to the study. 24 patients were treated with AZA monotherapy and 23 with AZA+entinostat. The median number of administered cycles was 4, significantly higher in patients treated with AZA (6 cycles vs. 3 cycles, P = 0·008). Haematological normalization rates were 46% in monotherapy and 17% in the combination arm. Median overall survivals were 13 and 6 months, respectively. The novel 50 * 10 schedule of azacitidine appears effective, with response rates, when given as single agent, comparable to those for patients with de novo MDS/AML treated on the same protocol. However, the combination of AZA and entinostat was associated with increased toxicity and could not be recommended for treatment of tMN.     

Elevated fetal haemoglobin is a predictor of better outcome in MDS/AML patients receiving 5‐aza‐2′‐deoxycytidine (Decitabine)

Although azanucleoside DNA‐hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are routinely used for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukaemia (MDS/AML), very few outcome predictors have been established. Expression of the β‐like globin gene locus is tightly regulated by DNA methylation, is HMA‐sensitive in vitro, and fetal haemoglobin (HbF) expression is under study as a potential biomarker for response of MDS patients to azacitidine. We determined HbF expression in 16 MDS and 36 AML patients receiving decitabine (DAC). Pre‐treatment HbF was already elevated (>1·0% of total haemoglobin) in 7/16 and 12/36 patients, and HbF was induced by DAC in 81%/54% of MDS/AML patients, respectively. Elevated pre‐treatment HbF was associated with longer median overall survival (OS): 26·6 vs. 8·6 months for MDS (hazard ratio [HR] 8·56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1·74–42·49, P = 0·008, with similarly longer progression‐free and AML‐free survival), and 10·0 vs. 2·9 months OS for AML (HR 3·01, 95% CI 1·26–7·22, P = 0·014). In a multivariate analysis, the prognostic value of HbF was retained. Time‐dependent Cox models revealed that the prognostic value of treatment‐induced HbF induction was inferior to that of pre‐treatment HbF. In conclusion, we provide first evidence for in vivo HbF induction by DAC in MDS/AML, and demonstrate prognostic value of elevated pre‐treatment HbF, warranting prospective, randomized studies.     

Patient‐related factors independently impact overall survival in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: an MDS‐CAN prospective study

Little is known about the effects of frailty, disability and physical functioning on the clinical outcomes for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). We investigated the predictive value of these factors on overall survival (OS) in 445 consecutive patients with MDS and chronic monomyelocytic leukaemia (CMML) enrolled in a multi‐centre prospective national registry. Frailty, comorbidity, instrumental activities of daily living, disability, quality of life, fatigue and physical performance measures were evaluated at baseline and were added as covariates to conventional MDS‐related factors as predictors of OS in Cox proportional hazards models. The median age was 73 years, and 79% had revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS‐R) risk scores of intermediate or lower. Frailty correlated only modestly with comorbidity. OS was significantly shorter for patients with higher frailty and comorbidity scores, any disability, impaired grip strength and timed chair stand tests. By multivariate analysis, the age‐adjusted IPSS‐R, frailty (Hazard ratio 2·7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1·7–4·2), P < 0·0001) and Charlson comorbidity score (Hazard ratio 1·8 (95% CI 1·1–2·8), P = 0·01) were independently prognostic of OS. Incorporation of frailty and comorbidity scores improved risk stratification of the IPSS‐R by 30% and 5%, respectively. These data demonstrate for the first time, the importance of considering frailty in prognostic models and a potential target for therapeutic intervention in optimizing clinical outcomes in older MDS patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02537990.     

Phase II study of tosedostat with cytarabine or decitabine in newly diagnosed older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia or high‐risk MDS

Tosedostat, an oral aminopeptidase inhibitor, has synergy with cytarabine and hypomethylating agents. We performed a Phase II trial to determine rates of complete remission (CR) and survival using tosedostat with cytarabine or decitabine in older patients with untreated acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) or high‐risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Thirty‐four patients ≥60 years old (median age 70 years; range, 60–83) were randomized to receive tosedostat (120 mg on days 1–21 or 180 mg continuously) with 5 d of either cytarabine (1 g/m²/d) or decitabine (20 mg/m²/d) every 35 d. Twenty‐nine patients (85%) had AML, including 15 (44%) with secondary AML/MDS, and 5 (15%) had MDS‐refractory anaemia with excess blasts type 2. The CR/CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) rate was 53% [9 in each arm; 14 CR (41%) and 4 CRi (12%)], attained in 6 of 14 patients with adverse cytogenetics and 4 of 7 with FLT3‐internal tandem duplication mutations. Median follow‐up was 11·2 months (range, 0·5–22·3), and median survival was 11·5 months (95% confidence interval, 5·2–16·7). Twenty‐three patients (67·6%) were treated as outpatients and 10 of these patients required hospitalization for febrile neutropenia. No Grade 3–4 non‐haematological toxicities required withdrawal from study. Tosedostat with cytarabine or decitabine is tolerated in older patients with untreated AML/MDS, results in a CR/CRi rate of >50%, and warrants further study in larger trials.     

Clinical outcome after failure of hypomethylating therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome

Around half of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) fail to respond to hypomethylating therapy (HMT) and most responders progress within 2 yr. Retrospective studies report poor outcomes after HMT failure. Here, we analyzed the outcomes of patients suffering HMT failure. Of 149 patients with MDS treated with either azacitidine or decitabine, 91 who experienced HMT failure were included in the study. Median overall survival (OS) was 12.1 months: 16.2 months for lower‐risk MDS and 9.3 months for higher‐risk MDS. Disease status and progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) at the time of HMT failure were independent prognostic factors for OS. Fifty‐four patients received one or more treatment modalities, and 23 received allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The objective response to non‐transplant treatments was poor (11–17%), whereas 17 transplanted patients showed a complete response. OS probability at 2 yr post‐HCT was 60.9%: 78.6% for patients receiving HCT during MDS and 33.3% for those receiving HCT after developing AML. In conclusion, the clinical outcome of patients after HMT failure was poor. Long‐term disease‐free survival was observed in approximately 50% of patients who received allogeneic HCT. Therefore, allogeneic HCT should be performed early in appropriate patients, and particularly before progression to AML.     

Predicting infections in high‐risk patients with myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia treated with azacitidine: Aretrospective multicenter study

Hypomethylating agents have become the standard therapy for patients with high‐risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). In Israel, azacitidine (AZA) is routinely used. Yet, infectious complications are common during AZA therapy. The current study was aimed to evaluate the incidence and predisposing risk factors for infections in AZA‐treated patients. This retrospective study included patients treated with AZA in 18 Israeli medical institutions between 2008 and 2011. Data on 184 patients [157 high‐risk MDS and 27 acute myeloid leukemia (AML)], with a median age of 71.6 (range 29–92) were recorded. Overall, 153 infectious events were reported during 928 treatment cycles (16.5%) administered to 100 patients. One hundred fourteen, 114/153 (75%) events required hospitalization and 30 (19.6%) were fatal. In a univariate analysis, unfavorable cytogenetics, low neutrophil, hemoglobin (Hb) and platelet (PLT) counts were found to be associated with infections (24.4% vs. 12.9%, P < 0.0001; 27% vs. 13.5%, P < 0.0001; 20.4% vs. 11%, P < 0.0001 and 29.2% vs. 14.2%, P < 0.0001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, only low Hb level, low PLT count, and unfavorable cytogenetics remained significant. Prior to therapy, poor cytogenetics, PLT count below 20 × 10⁹/L and neutrophil count below 0.5 × 10⁹/L were predictive of the risk of infection during the first two cycles of therapy. In conclusion, patients with unfavorable cytogenetics, presenting with low neutrophil and PLT counts, are susceptible to infections. Evaluation of infection risk should be repeated prior to each cycle. Patients with poor cytogenetics in whom AZA is prescribed despite low PLT count are particularly at high risk for infections and infection prophylaxis may be considered. Am. J. Hematol. 88:130–134, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

A phase I/II study of oral clofarabine plus low‐dose cytarabine in previously treated acute myeloid leukaemia and high‐risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients at least 60 years of age

Outcomes for older adults with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) are generally poor, and new effective therapies are needed. We investigated oral clofarabine combined with low‐dose cytarabine (LDAC) in patients aged 60 years and above with relapsed or refractory AML or high‐risk MDS in a phase I/II trial. A 3 + 3 dose escalation of oral clofarabine was followed by a phase II expansion with the aim of obtaining a complete response (CR) rate ≥30%. We identified 20 mg/d for 5 d as the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of oral clofarabine. A total of 35 patients, with a median age of 72 years, were treated. Of 26 patients enrolled at the MTD, 4 had treatment‐related grade 3–4 non‐haematological toxicities, but none died within 28 d. The observed CR rate and median survival were 34% [95% confidence interval (CI), 18–50%] and 6·8 months overall and 38% [95% CI, 19–57%] and 7·2 months at the MTD. The median disease‐free survival was 7·4 months. Fifty‐two percent (23/44) of cycles administered at the MTD were done without hospital admission. This combination of oral clofarabine and LDAC demonstrated efficacy with a CR rate of >30% and acceptable toxicity in older patients.     

Platelet count doubling after the first cycle of azacitidine therapy predicts eventual response and survival in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and oligoblastic acute myeloid leukaemia but does not add to prognostic utility of the revised IPSS

Reliable clinical or molecular predictors of benefit from azacitidine therapy in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are not defined. Doubling of platelet count at start of second cycle of azacitidine therapy compared to baseline was associated with achieving response and survival advantage in a Dutch cohort. To validate this observation, we analysed a larger cohort of North American patients, whose data was collected in a prospective clinical trial with a longer median follow‐up. We found a significant association between platelet count doubling after first cycle of azacitidine therapy and probability of achieving objective response. Among patients with MDS or oligoblastic acute myeloid leukaemia (<30% bone marrow blasts, n = 102), there was a statistically significant reduction in risk of death for patients who achieved platelet count doubling (n = 23, median OS, 21·0 months) compared to those who did not (n = 79, median OS, 16·7 months, adjusted hazard ratio (no/yes)=1·88, 95% confidence interval, 1·03–3·40, P = 0·04). Nonetheless, the addition of this platelet count doubling variable did not improve the survival prediction provided by the revised International Prognostic Scoring System or the French Prognostic Scoring System. Identification of reliable and consistent predictors for clinical benefit for azacitidine therapy remains an unmet medical need and a top research priority.     

Azacitidine treatment for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia with chromosome 3q abnormalities

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and myelodysplasia (MDS) with chromosome 3q abnormalities have a dismal outcome either untreated or with conventional treatments. Azacitidine (AZA) is now considered as the standard of care in high‐risk MDS and oligoblastic AML patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of azacitine treatment in this cytogenetic subgroup. We report here a multicentre retrospective study of 157 patients treated with AZA for AML/MDS with chromosome 3q abnormalities and 27 patients with isolated EVI‐1 overexpression. Median age was 65 years, 40 patients (25%) had inv(3)(q21q26.2) or t(3;3)(q21;q26.2), 36 patients (23%) had other balanced 3q26 rearrangements, 8 patients (5%) had balanced 3q21 rearrangements and 73 patients (46%) had other 3q abnormalities. The overall response rate was 50% (29% CR). Median overall survival was 10.6 months. By multivariate analysis, patients with lower bone marrow blast counts, higher platelet counts, non‐complex cytogenetics, and absence of prior treatment with intensive chemotherapy had a better outcome. 27 patients were allo‐transplanted and achieved a 21‐month median OS. Balanced 3q21 translocations were associated with a better response rate and overall survival. Outcome of patients with isolated EVI‐1 overexpression was comparable to that of patients with chromosome 3q lesions. Thus, AML/MDS patients with 3q abnormalities appear to be a heterogeneous group in their response to AZA, and AZA may represent a suitable option in particular as a bridge to allogeneic transplantation. Am. J. Hematol. 90:859–863, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Iron‐chelating therapy with deferasirox in transfusion‐dependent,higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a retrospective,multicentre study

Iron chelation is controversial in higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR‐MDS), outside the allogeneic transplant setting. We conducted a retrospective, multicentre study in 51 patients with transfusion‐dependent, intermediate‐to‐very high risk MDS, according to the revised international prognostic scoring system, treated with the oral iron chelating agent deferasirox (DFX). Thirty‐six patients (71%) received azacitidine concomitantly. DFX was given at a median dose of 1000 mg/day (range 375–2500 mg) for a median of 11 months (range 0·4–75). Eight patients (16%) showed grade 2–3 toxicities (renal or gastrointestinal), 4 of whom (8%) required drug interruption. Median ferritin levels decreased from 1709 μg/l at baseline to 1100 μg/l after 12 months of treatment (P = 0·02). Seventeen patients showed abnormal transaminase levels at baseline, which improved or normalized under DFX treatment in eight cases. One patient showed a remarkable haematological improvement. At a median follow up of 35·3 months, median overall survival was 37·5 months. The results of this first survey of DFX in HR‐MDS are comparable, in terms of safety and efficacy, with those observed in lower‐risk MDS. Though larger, prospective studies are required to demonstrate real clinical benefits, our data suggest that DFX is feasible and might be considered in a selected cohort of HR‐MDS patients.     

TP53 mutations in myelodysplastic syndrome are strongly correlated with aberrations of chromosome 5, and correlate with adverse prognosis

This study aimed to determine the incidence/prognostic impact of TP53 mutation in 318 myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients, and to correlate the changes to cytogenetics, single nucleotide polymorphism array karyotyping and clinical outcome. The median age was 65 years (17–89 years) and median follow‐up was 45 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 27–62 months]. TP53 mutations occurred in 30 (9·4%) patients, exclusively in isolated del5q (19%) and complex karyotype (CK) with ‐5/5q‐(72%), correlated with International Prognostic Scoring System intermediate‐2/high, TP53 protein expression, higher blast count and leukaemic progression. Patients with mutant TP53 had a paucity of mutations in other genes implicated in myeloid malignancies. Median overall survival of patients with TP53 mutation was shorter than wild‐type (9 versus 66 months, P < 0·001) and it retained significance in multivariable model (Hazard Ratio 3·8, 95%CI 2·3–6·3,P < 0·001). None of the sequentially analysed samples showed a disappearance of the mutant clone or emergence of new clones, suggesting an early occurrence of TP53 mutations. A reduction in mutant clone correlated with response to 5‐azacitidine, however clones increased in non‐responders and persisted at relapse. The adverse impact of TP53 persists after adjustment for cytogenetic risk and is of practical importance in evaluating prognosis. The relatively common occurrence of these mutations in two different prognostic spectrums of MDS, i.e. isolated 5q‐ and CK with ‐5/5q‐, possibly implies two different mechanistic roles for TP53 protein.     

Comparative clinical effectiveness of azacitidine versus decitabine in older patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

The hypomethylating agents (HMAs) azacitidine and decitabine are both approved for treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in the USA. In Europe, decitabine is not approved due to lack of survival advantage in randomized trials. The two drugs have not been compared in clinical trials. We identified patients diagnosed with MDS between 2004 and 2011 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)‐Medicare linked database in the USA who received ≥ 10 doses of either HMA. We estimated survival from HMA initiation with Kaplan–Meier methods and used multivariate Cox proportional hazards models to adjust for covariates. Analyses controlled for histological subtype and we conducted a subset analysis limited to patients with refractory anaemia with excess blasts (RAEB). In 2025 HMA‐treated patients, median survival was 15 months with no difference in survival based on the HMA received in adjusted analysis (decitabine versus azacitidine, hazard ratio = 1·06, 95% confidence interval: 0·94–1·19, P = 0·37). For RAEB patients (n = 523), median survival was 12 months, with no significant difference based on HMA received. No significant survival difference was found between azacitidine and decitabine in patients with MDS, including RAEB. Importantly, population‐based survival of azacitidine‐treated RAEB patients was substantially shorter than in the AZA‐001 clinical trial (11 versus 24·5 months).