不同入路切除鞍区脑膜瘤83例临床分析

目的 探讨不同入路显微外科手术切除鞍区脑膜瘤的临床疗效.方法 根据显微手术入路的不同将83例鞍区脑膜瘤患者分为翼点入路组27例,额下入路组30例以及纵裂入路组26例.对3组患者肿瘤切除效果、GCS评分、并发症发生率以及生活质量改善情况进行观察比较.结果 翼点入路组、额下入路组及纵裂入路组肿瘤切除总有效率分别为92.59％、90.00％及92.31％,3组差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).3组患者术后第7天GCS评分均得到显著改善,差异较手术前1天有统计学意义(P＜0.05).手术后纵裂入路组GCS评分明显高于翼点入路组及额下入路组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).翼点入路组、额下入路组及纵裂入路组并发症发生率分别为22.22％、23.33％及7.69％,纵裂入路组明显低于其他两组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).3组患者术后生活质量改善总有效率无统计学差异(P＞0.05).纵裂入路组生活质量改善率显著高于翼点入路组及额下入路组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论 纵裂入路切除鞍区脑膜瘤具有最好的临床疗效,可有效改善患者症状及生活质量、降低并发症发生率,对于患者恢复具有积极的意义.     

经腹与经腹膜后腹腔镜肾输尿管全长切除治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的临床研究

目的探讨经腹膜后入路腹腔镜肾输尿管全长切除联合膀胱袖状切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的可行性和安全性。方法将62例尿路上皮癌患者分为经腹腔入路组和经腹膜后入路组。经腹腔入路组患者均接受经腹腔入路腹腔镜肾输尿管全长切除联合膀胱袖状切除术治疗;而经腹膜后入路组患者则接受经腹膜后入路肾输尿管全长切除联合下腹部小切口膀胱袖状切除术治疗。观察并记录2组患者手术时间、术中出血量和住院时间等手术相关指标。术后观察2组患者术后并发症、肿瘤复发和转移情况,并于术前和术后3个月采用SF-36量表对患者的生活质量进行评分。结果经腹膜后入路组患者的手术时间、术中出血量和住院时间分别为(118.74±22.68)min、(124.69±43.78)mL和(8.12±2.21)d,均显著低于经腹腔入路组的,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);经腹膜后入路组患者术后3个月的生理功能、生理职能、躯体疼痛、总体健康、社会功能、活力、情感职能和精神健康共8个维度的评分均高于经腹腔入路组(P<0.05);经腹膜后入路组患者术后的并发症发生率为3.12%,显著低于经腹腔入路组的13.33%(P<0.05)。2组患者术后彩超和膀胱镜检查均未发现肿瘤复发情况;2组患者术后远处转移发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论经腹膜后入路肾输尿管全长切除联合下腹部小切口膀胱袖状切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌,创伤小,利于患者的康复,同时可提高患者的生活质量,安全有效,值得应用于临床。     

尾侧中间联合入路腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术的临床疗效观察

目的 探讨尾侧中间联合入路腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术的临床疗效.方法 采用随机数字表法将80例右半结肠癌患者分为中间组和联合组,每组40例,中间组采用中间入路的方式行腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术,联合组患者则采用尾侧中间联合入路的方式行腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术.比较两组患者的手术指标、术后恢复指标、血清炎性反应指标[C反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)]、术后并发症发生率、血清肿瘤标志物[癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类蛋白19-9(CA19-9)]水平及简明健康状况调查问卷(SF-36)评分.结果 联合组患者的手术时间及术后排气时间、拔管时间、进流食时间、住院时间均明显短于中间组(P﹤0.01),术中出血量明显少于中间组(P﹤0.01);两组患者的淋巴结清扫数目比较,差异无统计学意义(P﹥0.05).术前和术后3天,两组患者的血清CRP、IL-6水平比较,差异均无统计学意义(P﹥0.05).联合组患者的术后并发症总发生率为5.00％(2/40),与中间组患者的10.00％(4/40)比较,差异无统计学意义(P﹥0.05).术前和术后3个月,两组患者的血清CEA、CA19-9水平比较,差异均无统计学意义(P﹥0.05).术后3个月,联合组患者的SF-36评分高于中间组(P﹤0.05).结论 与常规中间入路相比,尾侧中间联合入路腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术能够缩短手术时间,降低术中出血量,提高患者生活质量,且不会增加术后并发症发生风险.     

经腹入路与后腹腔入路腹腔镜下肾部分切除术治疗肾肿瘤的疗效分析

目的 探讨经腹入路与后腹腔入路腹腔镜下肾部分切除术治疗肾肿瘤的疗效及安全性.方法 肾肿瘤患者29例,根据治疗方法分为两组,其中经腹入路组14例,后腹腔入路组共15例,比较两组患者的疗效及安全性.结果 患者年龄、性别、体质指数、ASA评分、R.E.N.A.L评分等一般资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);经腹入路组和后腹腔入路组手术时间分别为(252.6±62.6)min、(166.5±52.6)min,两组恢复进食时间分别为(46.3±9.8)h、(26.3±5.5)h,术后住院时间分别为(8.8±2.3)d、(6.5±1.8)d,经腹入路组手术时间、术后恢复时间和术后住院时间均长于后腹腔入路组,两组差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);经腹腔入路患者T分期较后腹腔入路者更高,其差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 经腹入路和后腹腔入路两种腹腔镜下肾部分切除术对于肾肿瘤的患者都是安全有效的好方法,各有优劣,经腹入路手术空间更大,后腹腔入路术后恢复更快.     

头尾联合入路和内侧入路在腹腔镜根治性右半结肠切除术中的对比研究

  目的  探讨头尾联合入路和内侧入路在腹腔镜根治性右半结肠切除术的临床近期疗效及并发症。  方法  回顾性分析2015年1月至2019年12月期间由徐州医科大学附属医院收治的91例腹腔镜根治性右半结肠切除术患者的临床资料，分为50例接受头尾联合入路组和41例接受内侧入路组。针对两组入路手术时间、术中出血量、Henle干及其属支损伤率、因Henle干及其属支损伤致中转开腹率、淋巴结清扫数量、阳性淋巴结数量、术后肠功能恢复时间、腹腔引流管拔除时间、术后住院时间及术后并发症等临床指标评价并分析头尾联合入路的潜在优势。  结果  头尾联合入路组在手术时间上显著短于内侧入路组[180（150~188）min vs.210（180~255）min，P < 0.05]、术中出血量显著少于内侧入路组[50（50~50）mL vs.100（50~100）mL，P < 0.05]、Henle干及其属支损伤率显著低于内侧入路组[0例vs.6例，P < 0.05]。两组因Henle干及其属支损伤致中转开腹率、淋巴结清扫数量、阳性淋巴结数量、术后肠功能恢复时间、腹腔引流管拔除时间、术后住院时间及术后淋巴漏等并发症发生情况差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）。  结论  腹腔镜头尾联合入路能显著减少术中出血量、缩短手术时间、降低Henle干属支血管损伤率，有较高的手术安全性，值得临床进一步推广应用。      

腹腔镜下中间入路与侧方入路右半结肠癌根治术的术中、术后情况比较

目的:探讨腹腔镜下中间入路右半结肠癌根治术的临床疗效及并发症。方法:回顾性分析在2015年6月1日至2018年6月1日期间由中国人民解放军第967医院普外科收治的82例右半结肠癌患者临床资料，45例患者接受腹腔镜中间入路右半结肠癌根治术，为中间入路组，37例患者接受腹腔镜侧方入路右半结肠癌根治术，为侧方入路组；对比两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、清扫淋巴结数量、中转开腹率、术后肠功能恢复时间、术后住院时间及术后并发症等临床指标，评价分析腹腔镜下中间入路右半结肠癌根治术的优越性。结果:中间入路组手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结清扫数量、中转开腹率与侧方入路组相比差异显著，均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；但中间入路组在术后肠功能恢复时间、术后住院时间及术后并发症发生情况等方面与侧方入路组相比无统计学差异（P＞0.05）。结论:采用腹腔镜下中间入路右半结肠癌根治术能缩短手术时间、减少术中出血量、减少中转开腹率、增加清扫淋巴结个数，近期治疗效果满意，值得在临床中应用并推广。     

不同入路CT导引下腹腔神经丛毁损术治疗上腹部癌性疼痛的疗效观察

目的探讨不同入路CT导引下腹腔神经丛毁损术治疗上腹部癌性疼痛的临床疗效。方法选取2013年4月至2015年7月间宝鸡市中医医院收治的90例上腹部癌性疼痛患者,采用随机数表法分为前入路组和后入路组,每组45例。所有患者均行CT导引下腹腔神经丛毁损术,前入路组患者采用前入路法,后入路组患者采用后入路法,观察两组患者术后临床表现、手术成功率、治疗效果及并发症状况。结果前入路法与后入路法手术成功率均为100.0%,两组患者术后均有并发症表现,经适当治疗后痊愈,无严重并发症发生。前入路组患者临床短期(<1个月)显效率为70.1%,总有效率为96.3%,后入路组患者短期显效率为63.4%,总有效率为92.5%;前入路组长期(>3个月)显效率为50.3%,总有效率为90.1%,后入路组长期显效率为44.7%,总有效率为81.6%,前入路组患者临床短期与长期显效率和总有效率均较高,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论经前入路法CT导引下穿刺腹腔神经丛毁损术治疗癌性疼痛临床疗效较理想,值得推广。     

Wiltse入路与后正中入路TLIF手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较研究

目的探讨Wiltse入路与后正中入路TLIF手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床疗效及术后相邻节段退变是否存在差异。方法 2014年6月至2015年6月,我科对100例腰椎间盘突出症患者采用TLIF手术治疗,按入院顺序编号利用SPSS软件随机采用Wiltse入路和后正中手术入路两种方法进行。90例获随访,其中Wiltse入路46例,后正中入路44例。比较两组术前、术后1天肌酸激酶值(creatine kinase,CK),术前、术后3个月及终末随访的疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(oswestry disability index,ODI),术前、终末随访多裂肌脂肪浸润评分和融合节段相邻上位椎间盘修正MRI指数。结果所有患者均无定位错误、神经损伤、脑脊液漏、椎间隙感染等严重并发症,随访时间11~23个月,平均(15.8±3.7)个月,Wiltse入路组术前、术后1天CK分别为(83.84±24.79)U/L,(164.26±23.74)U/L;后正中手术入路组术前、术后1天CK分别为(79.93±23.50)U/L,(419.27±40.94)U/L。Wiltse入路组术前、术后3个月和终末随访VAS评分分别为(7.00±1.23)分,(1.52±0.67)分,(1.48±0.51)分;后正中手术入路组术前、术后3个月和终末随访VAS评分分别为(7.27±1.24)分,(2.09±0.61)分,(2.18±0.66)分。Wiltse入路组术前、术后3个月和终末随访ODI评分分别为68.26±8.97,22.78±4.30,22.96±3.95;后正中手术入路组术前、术后3个月和终末随访ODI评分分别为69.18±9.83,27.55±2.82,27.82±3.54。Wiltse入路组术前、终末随访多裂肌脂肪浸润评分分别为(1.26±0.45)分,(1.35±0.57)分;后正中手术入路术前、终末随访多裂肌脂肪浸润评分分别为(1.36±0.49)分,(2.05±0.58)分;Wiltse入路组术前、终末随访融合节段相邻上位椎间盘修正MRI指数分别为69.98±16.68,68.85±12.38;后正中手术入路术前、终末随访融合节段相邻上位椎间盘修正MRI指数分别为67.98±14.84,55.19±11.99。两组术前CK、VAS、ODI、多裂肌脂肪浸润评分、融合节段相邻上位椎间盘修正MRI指数的差异无统计学意义,两组术后1天CK、术后3个月VAS、终末随访VAS、术后3个月ODI、终末随访ODI、终末随访多裂肌脂肪浸润评分、终末访融合节段相邻上位椎间盘修正MRI指数差异有统计学意义。Wiltse手入路组在术后疼痛、疗效、多裂肌损伤和融合节段相邻上位椎间盘退变情况比后正中入路组具有优势。结论在腰椎间盘突出患者行TLIF手术的治疗过程中,Wiltse手术入路比后正中入路具有优势,延缓融合相邻节段退变,提高患者的生活质量。     

经口腔前庭入路与经胸前入路手术对甲状腺癌患者术后甲状旁腺功能的影响

目的 探讨经口腔前庭入路与经胸前入路手术对甲状腺癌患者术后甲状旁腺功能的影响。方法 回顾性分析224例甲状腺乳头状癌患者临床资料，其中采用经口腔前庭入路治疗的112例患者纳入A组，经胸前入路手术治疗的112例患者纳入B组。对患者进行1年随访，对比2组围术期指标、手术前后疼痛评分(VAS)、甲状旁腺激素(PTH)及血钙水平。结果 A组手术时间长于B组，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组患者术中出血量、中央区淋巴结清扫数量、住院时间、术后PTH及血钙水平比较，差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组术后VAS评分高于B组，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 经口腔前庭入路及经胸前入路均可有效治疗甲状腺癌，在手术入路方式选择中需依据病灶范围进行选择，以获得最佳的手术效果，利于预后。     

尾侧入路与中间入路腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术对患者肿瘤转移、胃肠激素及免疫功能的影响

目的 探讨尾侧入路与中间入路腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术对患者肿瘤转移、胃肠激素及免疫功能的影响.方法 依据手术入路方式将82例右半结肠癌患者分为观察组和对照组,每组41例,观察组患者采用尾侧入路腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术治疗,对照组患者采用中间入路腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术治疗.比较两组患者围手术期指标、外周血鸟苷酸环化酶C(GCC)-mRNA表达情况、胃肠激素和免疫功能指标.结果 两组患者术中中转开腹率、引流管拔除时间、首次排气时间、淋巴结清扫数、手术镇痛时间、住院时间均无明显差异,但观察组患者手术时间短于对照组(P﹤0.05),术中出血量和术中血管损伤率均低于对照组(P﹤0.05).手术前后,两组患者GCC-mRNA阳性表达率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P﹥0.05);术后,观察组患者GCC-mRNA阳性表达率明显高于本组术前(P﹤0.05).术后,两组患者胃肽、胃泌素、胃动素水平均低于本组术前(P﹤0.05),且观察组患者胃肽、胃泌素、胃动素水平均高于对照组(P﹤0.05).术后,两组患者辅助性T(Th)1细胞计数均低于本组术前(P﹤0.05),Th2、Th17、调节性T(Treg)细胞计数均高于本组术前(P﹤0.05),且观察组患者Th1细胞计数高于对照组(P﹤0.05),Th2、Th17、Treg细胞计数均低于对照组(P﹤0.05).结论 尾侧入路腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术术中血管损伤率较低,对患者胃肠激素水平和免疫功能的影响较小,可能会在一定程度上降低术后复发转移风险.     

进展期胆囊癌区域化淋巴结清扫临床研究

目的探讨进展期胆囊癌区域化淋巴结清扫的方法和意义。方法回顾性分析226例确诊为进展期胆囊癌患者的临床资料,收集患者的临床资料并进行整理分析,并对患者进行随访,分析进展期胆囊癌区域化淋巴结清扫的特点及手术方法。结果 226例患者中,男性71例,女性155例,平均年龄(63.5±13.2)岁,中位年龄65岁,大部分患者胆囊有既往病史,且表现出一种或数种胆囊癌的临床症状;B超检查诊断率为51.82%;CT检查诊断率为72.19%;B超联合CT检查,诊断率为81.46%;肿瘤标志物CA199升高比例为73.89%;CA125升高比例为56.64%;CEA升高比例为38.94%;上述任意一种肿瘤标志物升高比例为91.15%;胆囊癌根治术平均淋巴结清扫个数为(9.51±3.50)个,中位个数为8个;保守治疗者术后生存时间为(16.56±3.46)个月;手术治疗者术后生存时间为(21.51±5.46)个月,两者术后生存时间比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论胆囊癌根治术时,可将第八和第十三组淋巴结连同肝十二指肠韧带周围淋巴结一并清除。     

经左胸和胸腹腔镜联合食管癌术后并发膈疝的诊治和预防

目的分析经左胸和胸腹腔镜联合食管癌术后膈疝的发生原因和临床特点,讨论其诊断防治方法。方法回顾性分析10例食管癌术后发生膈疝的临床资料。结果术后早期并发膈疝5例（术后1个月内）,远期5例（术后1-11年）。其中1例结肠穿孔,行结肠造口术,术后死于呼吸衰竭;6例经手术治愈;1例放弃手术治疗;2例无明显症状,未予手术治疗。结论食管癌术后膈疝是一种少见而严重的并发症,经左胸径路和胸腹腔镜联合经右胸径路均可发生,其发生与手术操作不当、微创技术的应用导致腹膜粘连减少、术后腹压增加及患者自身体质等因素有关,重在预防,早期诊断、及时手术是防止肠坏死、减少死亡率的有效方法。     

The relevance of the Siewert classification in the era of multimodal therapy for adenocarcinoma of the gastro‐oesophageal junction

Introduction

The Siewert classification has been used to plan treatment for tumours of the gastro‐oesophageal junction since its proposal in the 1980s. The purpose of this study was to assess its continued relevance by evaluating whether there were differences in the biology and clinical characteristics of adenocarcinomas by Siewert type, in a contemporary cohort of patients, in whom the majority had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

A prospective database was reviewed for all patients who underwent resection from 2005 to 2011 and analysed with regard to Siewert classification determined from the pathological specimen, treatment and clincopathological outcomes.

Results

Two hundred and sixteen patients underwent oesophagogastric resection: 133 for type I, 51 for type II and 33 for type III tumours. 135 Patients (62.5%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with no difference between groups. There were no significant differences in age, sex, pT stage, pN stage, pM stage, ASA, or inpatient complications between patients with adenocarcinoma based on their Siewert classification. There was a significant increase in maximum tumour diameter (P = 0.023), perineural invasion (P = 0.021) and vascular invasion (P = 0.020), associated with more distal tumours (Type III > Type II > Type I). Median overall survival was significantly shorter for more distal tumours (Type I: 4.96 years vs. Type II: 3.3 years vs. Type III: 2.64 years; P = 0.04). The surgical approach did not influence survival.

Conclusion

In the era of multi‐modal treatment pathological Siewert tumour type is of prognostic value, as patients with Type III disease are likely to have larger and more aggressive tumours that lead to worse outcomes. J. Surg. Oncol. 2014;109:202–207. © 2013 The Authors. Journal of Surgical Oncology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Surgical treatment of stage IV colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BackgroundThe ideal treatment approach for colorectal cancer (CRC) with synchronous liver metastases (SCRLM) remains debated. We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing the ‘bowel-first’ approach (BFA), simultaneous resection (SIM), and the ‘liver-first’ approach (LFA).MethodsA systematic search of comparative studies in CRC with SCRLM was undertaken using the Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases. Outcome measures included postoperative complications, 30- and 90-day mortality, chemotherapy use, treatment completion rate, 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival, and 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS). Pairwise and network meta-analysis were performed to compare strategies. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Higgins I² statistic.ResultsOne prospective and 43 retrospective studies reporting on 10 848 patients were included. Patients undergoing the LFA were more likely to have rectal primaries and a higher metastatic load. The SIM approach resulted in a higher risk of major morbidity and 30-day mortality. Compared to the BFA, the LFA more frequently resulted in failure to complete treatment as planned (34% versus 6%). Pairwise and network meta-analysis showed a similar 5-year OS between LFA and BFA and a more favorable 5-year OS after SIM compared to LFA (odds ratio 0.25–0.90, p = 0.02, I² = 0%), but not compared to BFA.ConclusionDespite a higher tumor load in LFA compared to BFA patients, survival was similar. A lower rate of treatment completion was observed with LFA. Uncertainty remains substantial due to imprecise estimates of treatment effects. In the absence of prospective trials, treatment of stage IV CRC patients should be individually tailored.     

不同手术入路的腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌的疗效及安全性

目的探讨不同手术入路的腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌的疗效及安全性。方法选择接受腹腔镜手术治疗的156例直肠癌患者作为研究对象,根据入院先后顺序,采用随机数字表法分为A组和B组,各78例。A组采用头侧中间入路,B组采用传统中间入路。比较2组术后病理TNM分期、组织学分化程度,记录术中和术后主要结局指标,淋巴结清扫结果及手术相关并发症发生情况,随访12个月,观察术后生存、肿瘤复发或转移情况。结果所有患者均顺利完成手术,未见中转开腹病例,手术切缘均为阴性。在A组和B组中分别有2例(2.56%)、3例(3.85%)患者第253组淋巴结病理学检查结果显示肿瘤学阳性,2组术后病理TNM分期及组织学分化程度比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间、住院时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组手术时间明显短于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组淋巴结清扫数目比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组清扫肠系膜下动脉(IMA)周围淋巴结时间明显短于B组,第253组淋巴结清扫数目明显多于B组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。所有患者均获得随访,未见肿瘤相关死亡、复发或转移病例;2组手术相关并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论头侧中间入路的腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌可获得与传统中间入路相当的近期疗效,安全性可靠,在手术视野暴露、进入正确解剖间隙和清扫第253组淋巴结上具有优势,值得进一步研究应用。     

The changing role of the surgeon in the management of cancer in the university setting and its impact on resident training.

A retrospective review was performed of 22,168 cancer cases registered by the Tumor Registry between 1965 and 1990. Eighty-six percent of these cases involved solid tumors; this number remained fairly constant throughout the study period. There was a significant trend toward more advanced disease at the time of presentation, most marked in the last 10 years; prior to 1980, 63.7% had localized or in situ cancer as opposed to only 49.4% since 1980 (P < 0.001). This suggested that more advanced cases were being submitted for treatment. As expected, more disseminated disease at the time of presentation was coupled with an overall decrease in the number of cases in which surgery comprised part of the treatment: 43.6% prior to 1980 vs. 38.1% after 1980. This trend has reversed, however, in the last 5 years. Though the number of cases in which surgery was the only treatment modality remained constant prior to and after 1985 (26.8% and 27.1%, respectively), the number of cases in which surgery was part of a multimodality treatment plan significantly increased (39.9% prior to 1985; 45.3% after 1985). This was coupled with a significant decrease in the number of cases treated with nonsurgical modalities alone (60.1% prior to 1985; 54.7% after 1985). Therefore, not only has the surgeon been called upon to operate on more advanced disease for cure in the last 5 years, but he or she has also become increasingly involved in multimodality treatment. Since 40.4% of university departments of surgery (as of 1990) did not provide specific training in surgical oncology, it is suggested that these departments reevaluate the objectives of their educational programs in view of the changing, increasingly complex role of the surgeon in the multidisciplinary approach to the care of the cancer patient.     

聚焦解决模式对卵巢癌术后化疗患者心理弹性及自我效能感的影响

目的探讨聚焦解决模式对卵巢癌术后化疗患者心理弹性及自我效能感的影响。方法依据随机数字表法将94例卵巢癌术后化疗患者分为对照组和观察组,每组47例,对照组患者给予常规干预,观察组患者在对照组的基础上按照聚焦解决模式进行干预。比较干预前和干预3个月后两组患者的心理弹性量表(CDRISC)评分和中文版癌症自我管理效能感量表(C-SUPPH)评分。结果干预前,两组患者的CDRISC评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P﹥0.05);干预3个月后,观察组患者的CDRISC评分明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.01)。干预前,两组患者C-SUPPH各维度评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P﹥0.05);干预3个月后,观察组患者C-SUPPH各维度评分均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。结论聚焦解决模式对提高卵巢癌术后化疗患者的心理弹性水平和自我效能感具有重要意义。     

Current multidisciplinary oncology series

“Cancers of the Colon and Rectum: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Diagnosis and Management” represents a truly multidisciplinary compendium of the management of these tumors that will be of value both for any physician involved in providing care for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients as well as for trainees of many medical disciplines.     

An integrative approach for the identification of prognostic and predictive biomarkers in rectal cancer

Introduction

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the world, a small fraction of which is represented by locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). If not medically contraindicated, preoperative chemoradiotherapy, represent the standard of care for LARC patients. Unfortunately, patients shows a wide range of response rates in which approximately 20% has a complete pathological response, whereas in 20 to 40% the response is poor or absent.

Results

The following specific gene signature, able to discriminate responders'' patients from non-responders, were founded: AKR1C3, CXCL11, CXCL10, IDO1, CXCL9, MMP12 and HLA-DRA. These genes are mainly involved in immune system pathways and interact with drugs traditionally used in the adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer.

Discussion

The present study suggests that new ideas for therapy could be found not only limited to studying genes differentially expressed between the two groups of patients but deepening the mechanisms, associated to response, in which they are involved.

Methods

Gene expression studies performed by: Agostini et al., Rimkus et al. and Kim et al. have been merged through a meta-analysis of the raw data. Gene expression data-sets have been processed using A-MADMAN. Common differentially expressed gene (DEG) were identified through SAM analysis. To further characterize the identified DEG we deeply investigated its biological role using an integrative computational biology approach.