Diurnal pattern of clock gene expression in the hypothalamus of the newborn rabbit

In the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) nursing acts as a strong non-photic synchronizer of circadian rhythmicity in the newborn young. Rabbits only nurse for a few minutes once every 24 h and previous studies have shown that the pups, blind at birth, display endogenous circadian rhythms in behavior and physiology entrained by this regular daily event. As a further step toward understanding the neural organization of the rabbit's early circadian system, we investigated the expression of clock genes in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus (SCN; the principal circadian pacemaker in adult mammals) across the pups' 24-h day. We used 43 pups from seven litters maintained in constant darkness and entrained non-photically by nursing at the same time each day until P7. After nursing on day 7, pups were killed in the dark at 3-h intervals so as to obtain eight groups (n=5-6 pups/group) distributed evenly across the 24 h before the next scheduled nursing. Profiles in the expression of the clock genes Per1, Per2, Cry1 and Bmal1 were determined using in situ hybridization in brain sections through the hypothalamus at the level of the SCN. We report for the first time: 1) that Per1, Per2, Cry1 and Bmal1 are all expressed in the SCN of the newborn rabbit, 2) that the expression of Per1, Per2 and Bmal1 but not Cry1 shows diurnal rhythmicity similar to that in adult mammals, and 3) that the expression of Per1, Per2 and Bmal1 is consistent with the strong entraining effect of nursing found in previous studies. Unexpectedly, and contrasting somewhat to the pattern in the SCN, we also found diurnal rhythmicity in the expression of Cry1 and Bmal1 but not of Per1 in the anterior ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus. Overall, our findings suggest that the SCN is a functional part of the newborn rabbit's circadian system and that it can be entrained by non-photic cues associated with the mother's daily nursing visit.     

Dark pulse resetting of the suprachiasmatic clock in Syrian hamsters: behavioral phase-shifts and clock gene expression

In mammals, the circadian clock in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) is mainly synchronized to photic cues provided by the daily light/dark cycle. Phase-shifts produced by light exposure during the night are correlated with rapid induction of two clock genes, Per1 and Per2, in the SCN. Nonphotic stimuli such as behavioral and pharmacological cues, when presented during the subjective day, induce behavioral phase-advances and a down-regulation of Per1 and Per2 expression in the SCN. When applied during the subjective day, dark pulses in continuous light also produce phase-advances. These phase-shifting effects have been interpreted as reflecting either a photic image mirror, nonphotic cues, or a combination of both. Here we evaluated in Syrian hamsters housed in constant light how dark pulses applied in late subjective day affect levels of Per1, Per2 and Cry1 mRNA. Four-hour dark pulses with no access to a wheel produced 1.2+/-0.4 h phase-advances of locomotor activity rhythm while control manipulation induced non-significant shifts (0.1+/-0.2 h). Dark pulses transiently down-regulated Per1 and Per2 mRNA levels in the SCN by 40 and 20% respectively, while the levels of Cry1 mRNA remained unaffected. In behaviorally split hamsters in which Per oscillations were asymmetric between the left and right sides of the SCN, dark pulses reduced Per expression in the half-SCN with high Per. This study shows that exposure during the late subjective day to dark pulses independent of wheel-running have nonphotic-like effects on the SCN clock at both behavioral and molecular levels.     

Compartmentalized expression of light-induced clock genes in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the diurnal grass rat (Arvicanthis niloticus)

Photic responses of the circadian system are mediated through light-induced clock gene expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). In nocturnal rodents, depending on the timing of light exposure, Per1 and Per2 gene expression shows distinct compartmentalized patterns that correspond to the behavioral responses. Whether the gene- and region-specific induction patterns are unique to nocturnal animals, or are also present in diurnal species is unknown. We explored this question by examining the light-induced Per1 and Per2 gene expression in functionally distinct SCN subregions, using diurnal grass rats Arvicanthis niloticus. Light exposure during nighttime induced Per1 and Per2 expression in the SCN, showing unique spatiotemporal profiles depending on the phase of the light exposure. After a phase delaying light pulse (LP) in the early night, strong Per1 induction was observed in the retinorecipient core region of the SCN, while strong Per2 induction was observed throughout the entire SCN. After a phase advancing LP in the late night, Per1 was first induced in the core and then extended into the whole SCN, accompanied by a weak Per2 induction. This compartmentalized expression pattern is very similar to that observed in nocturnal rodents, suggesting that the same molecular and intercellular pathways underlying acute photic responses are present in both diurnal and nocturnal species. However, after an LP in early subjective day, which induces phase advances in diurnal grass rats, but not in nocturnal rodents, we did not observe any Per1 or Per2 induction in the SCN. This result suggests that in spite of remarkable similarities in the SCN of diurnal and nocturnal rodents, unique mechanisms are involved in mediating the phase shifts of diurnal animals during the subjective day.     

Circadian and photic regulation of immediate-early gene expression in the hamster suprachiasmatic nucleus

The hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus is the site of an endogenous circadian clock synchronized by daily light-dark cycles. At some daily phases, light exposure both shifts the clock and alters the expression of several immediate-early genes in cells of the suprachiasmatic nucleus. We have studied both spontaneous circadian and light-induced expression of several immediate-early gene messenger RNAs and proteins in hamsters in constant darkness or in response to brief light exposure. There was no detectable spontaneous expression of NGFI-A messenger RNA in suprachiasmatic nucleus cells at any circadian phase, but light pulses induced its expression selectively during the subjective night, with highest levels of expression 6 h into the night. We also found that there are two independent rhythms of expression of junB messenger RNA and JunB protein, as well as c-fos messenger RNA and c-Fos protein, in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of hamsters: a rhythm of photic sensitivity expressed throughout the night and a spontaneous rhythm of expression triggered around dawn. Induction of NGFI-A messenger RNA and c-fos messenger RNA and c-Fos protein in response to a light pulse were found throughout the suprachiasmatic nucleus, with the highest levels of expression in the ventrolateral subdivision; however, the spontaneous expression of JunB and c-Fos proteins was confined mainly to the dorsomedial suprachiasmatic nucleus. The temporal and anatomical differences in the expression of these immediate-early genes in the mammalian suprachiasmatic nucleus suggest that their protein products may be involved in different signaling mechanisms mediating either photic entrainment or endogenous oscillations within distinct subpopulations of suprachiasmatic nucleus cells.     

Clock genes, circadian rhythms and food intake

The molecular clockwork in mammals involves various clock genes with specific temporal patterns of expression. Synchronization of the master circadian clock located in the suprachiasmatic nuclei is accomplished mainly via daily resetting of the phase of the clock by light stimuli. Phase shifting responses to light are correlated with induction of Per1 and Per2 within the suprachiasmatic cells. The timing of peripheral oscillators is controlled by the suprachiasmatic clock when food is available ad libitum. Time of feeding, as modulated by temporal restricted feeding, is a potent Zeitgeber (synchronizer) for peripheral oscillators with no clear synchronizing influence on the suprachiasmatic clockwork. However, a timed calorie restriction (i.e. when only a hypocaloric diet is given each day at the same time) can modify the temporal organization generated by the suprachiasmatic nuclei and reset by the light-dark cycle. Such a situation of conflict between photic and feeding synchronizers alters timing of clock gene expression within the suprachiasmatic nuclei and timing of circadian outputs, indicating that the suprachiasmatic clock is sensitive to nutritional cues.     

Aging and circadian clock gene expression in peripheral tissues in rats

Aging is associated with alterations of the circadian rhythms (shortened amplitude and phase-advance). We studied by quantitative RT-PCR the influence of aging on the expression of circadian clock genes (Clock, Bmal1, Cry1,2, Per1-3) in peripheral tissues (liver and heart) of middle-aged (13 months) and old (27 months) rats of the Wag/Rij strain exposed to a 12 hours light/12 hours dark cycle. Rats were killed at the light-dark transition (8 am and 8 pm). In the liver, Per, Cry et Bmal1 genes showed a morning/evening difference of expression; in addition, old rats exhibited a significant decrease of Per gene expression in the evening vs middle-aged rats. The heart showed similar profiles with only a tendency toward a decrease of Per expression and an increased Bmal1 expression in the evening in old rats. These results show that aging is associated with circadian gene expression changes.     

Attenuation of circadian light induced phase advances and delays by neuropeptide Y and a neuropeptide Y Y1/Y5 receptor agonist

Circadian rhythms can be synchronised to photic and non-photic stimuli. The circadian clock, anatomically defined as the suprachiasmatic nucleus in mammals, can be phase shifted by light during the night. Non-photic stimuli reset the circadian rhythm during the day. Photic and non-photic stimuli have been shown to interact during the day and night. Precise mechanisms for these complex interactions are unknown. A possible pathway for non-photic resetting of the clock is thought to generate from the intergeniculate leaflet, which conveys information to the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) through the geniculohypothalamic tract and utilises neuropeptide Y (NPY) as its primary neurotransmitter.Interactions between light and NPY were investigated during the early (2 h after activity onset) and late (6 h after activity onset) night in male Syrian hamsters. NPY microinjections into the region of the SCN significantly attenuated light-induced phase delay, during the early subjective night. Phase advances to light were completely inhibited by the administration of NPY during the late night.The precise mechanism by which NPY attenuates or blocks photic phase shifts is unclear, but the NPY Y5 receptor has been implicated in the mediation of this inhibitory effect. The NPY Y1/Y5 receptor agonist, [Leu(31),Pro(34)]NPY, was administered via cannula microinjections following light exposure during the early and late night. [Leu(31),Pro(34)]NPY significantly attenuated phase delays to light during the early night and blocked phase advances during the late night, in a manner similar to NPY.These results show the ability of NPY to attenuate phase shifts to light during the early night and block light-induced phase advances during the late night. Furthermore, this is the first in vivo study implicating the involvement of the NPY Y1/Y5 receptors in the complex interaction of photic and non-photic stimuli during the night. The alteration of photic phase shifts by NPY may influence photic entrainment within the circadian system.     

Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide produces a phase shift associated with induction of mPer expression in the mouse suprachiasmatic nucleus

The main mammalian circadian pacemaker is located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus. Clock genes such as the mouse Period gene (mPer) play a role in this core clock mechanism in the mouse. With brief light exposure during the subjective night, the photic information, which is conveyed directly to the suprachiasmatic nucleus via the retinohypothalamic tract, results in mPer1 and mPer2 expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus.Glutamate and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) are co-stored in the retinohypothalamic tract. Recent studies have suggested that not only glutamate but also PACAP are key players in the phase shift that occurs during subject night; however, research demonstrating a direct association between the PACAP-induced phase shift and mPer gene expression has yet to be conducted.In the present study, PACAP (200 pmol) injected into the lateral ventricle during subjective night (circadian time 16; circadian time 12, onset of locomotor activity) caused a moderate phase delay associated with moderate expression of mPer1 and only slight expression of mPer2 in the mouse suprachiasmatic nucleus. PACAP-induced mPer1 expression was also observed in the paraventricular nucleus and periventricular area of the hypothalamus. (+)MK-801 (0.5 mg/kg), an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, suppressed both the PACAP-induced phase delay and mPer1 expression. From these results we suggest that PACAP induces phase delays in the mouse circadian rhythm in association with an increase of mPer expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus via the activation of NMDA receptors.     

Neuropeptide Y and N-methyl-D-aspartic acid interact within the suprachiasmatic nuclei to alter circadian phase

Circadian rhythms are reset by exposure to photic stimuli and nonphotic stimuli. Glutamate appears to be the primary neurotransmitter that communicates photic stimuli to the circadian clock located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. There is also substantial evidence that neuropeptide Y (NPY) mediates the effects of at least some nonphotic stimuli on the circadian clock. The purpose of this study was to investigate how NPY and glutamate receptor activation interact to reset the phase of the circadian clock. Microinjection of the glutamate agonist N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) during the subjective day significantly decreased NPY-induced phase advances. During the late subjective night, NMDA induced light-like phase advances, which were significantly reduced by microinjection of NPY. Microinjection of NPY inhibited NMDA-induced phase advances during the late subjective night, even when sodium-dependent action potentials were inhibited by tetrodotoxin. These data support the hypothesis that, during the subjective night, NPY and NMDA act on the same clock cells or on cells that communicate with clock cells by mechanisms not requiring action potentials. Although NPY and NMDA appear to be mutually inhibitory during both the day and the night, the mechanisms of this inhibition appear to be different during the day versus the night.     

Neuropeptide Y,GABA and circadian phase shifts to photic stimuli

Circadian rhythms can be phase shifted by photic and non-photic stimuli. The circadian clock, anatomically defined as the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), can be phase delayed by light during the early subjective night and phase advanced during the late subjective night. Non-photic stimuli reset the clock when presented during the subjective day. A possible pathway for the non-photic resetting of the clock is thought to originate from the intergeniculate leaflet, which conveys information to the SCN through the geniculohypothalamic tract and utilizes among others neuropeptide Y (NPY) and GABA as neurotransmitters. Photic and non-photic stimuli have been shown to interact during the early and late subjective night. Microinjections of NPY or muscimol, a GABA_A receptor agonist, into the region of the SCN can attenuate light-induced phase shifts during the early and late subjective night. The precise mechanism for these interactions is unknown.

In the current study we investigate the involvement of a GABAergic mechanism in the interaction between NPY and light during the early and late subjective night. Microinjections of NPY significantly attenuated light-induced phase delays and inhibited phase advances (P<0.05). The administration of bicuculline during light exposure, before NPY microinjection did not alter the ability of NPY to attenuate light-induced phase delays and block photic phase advances.

These results indicate that NPY attenuates photic phase shifts via a mechanism independent of GABA_A receptor activation. Furthermore it is evident that NPY influences circadian clock function via differing cellular pathways over the course of a circadian cycle.     

Secretion of DJ-1 into the serum of patients with Parkinson's disease

In the diurnal rodent Arvicanthis niloticus (grass rats) the pattern of expression of the clock genes and their proteins in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is very similar to that seen in nocturnal rodents. Rhythms in clock gene expression have been also documented in several forebrain regions outside the SCN in nocturnal Ratus norvegicus (lab rats). To investigate the neural basis for differences in the circadian systems of diurnal and nocturnal mammals, we examined PER1 expression in the oval nucleus of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST-OV), and in the basolateral (BLA) and the central (CEA) amygdala of male grass rats kept in a 12:12 light/dark cycle. In the BNST-OV, peak levels of PER1 expression were seen early in the light phase of the cycle, 12h out of phase with what has been reported for nocturnal lab rats. In the BLA the pattern of PER1 expression featured sustained high levels during the day and low levels at night. PER1 expression in the CEA was also at its highest early in the light phase, but the effect of sampling time was not statistically significant (p<0.06). The results are consistent with the hypothesis that differences between nocturnal and diurnal species are due to differences in neural systems downstream from the SCN.