In vitro and in vivo interaction between cisplatin and topotecan in ovarian carcinoma systems

Topotecan, a camptothecin analogue, is a␣specific inhibitor of topoisomerase I approved for use in the treatment of patients with refractory ovarian carcinoma. The drug's mechanism of action suggests a potential efficacy of drug combinations incorporating DNA-damaging agents. In an attempt better to define a␣rational basis for drug combination we examined the effect of topotecan on the cytotoxicity and antitumor activity of cisplatin in an ovarian carcinoma system growing in vitro and in vivo as a tumor xenograft. The in vitro cell system included a cisplatin-sensitive cell line, IGROV-1, and a cisplatin-resistant subline, IGROV-1/Pt0.5, which is characterized by p53 mutation and loss of normal function of the wild-type gene of the parental cell line. This cell system was chosen since the cell sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents appears to be dependent on p53 gene status. Cytotoxicity was assessed by the growth inhibition assay using different schedules: (a) a 1-h period of cisplatin exposure followed by a 24-h topotecan treatment and (b) a 1-h period of simultaneous exposure to cisplatin and topotecan. In the case of the sequential schedule, an additive interaction was observed in IGROV-1 and IGROV-1/Pt0.5 cells. When the simultaneous schedule was used, a synergistic interaction, more evident for the cisplatin-sensitive cells, was found. On the basis of these observations at a cellular level, the effect of concomitant administration of the two drugs (i.e., the most favorable schedule) was studied in the IGROV-1 tumor xenograft, which is moderately responsive to cisplatin and topotecan. Suboptimal doses of each drug (with a low dose of topotecan, 5.1 mg/kg) achieved an antitumor effect comparable with or superior to that of the optimal dose of a single treatment (tumor weight inhibition, 60%), thus indicating a␣pharmacological advantage of the combination over the single treatment. However, an increase in the topotecan dose (7.1 mg/kg) was associated with an evident increase in the toxicity of the combination, thereby suggesting that the drug interaction was not tumor-specific. Although the molecular basis of the drug interaction is not clear, it is likely that inhibition of topoisomerase I affects the ability of cells to repair cisplatin adducts. Such findings may have pharmacological implications since they suggest the potential clinical interest of topoisomerase I inhibitors in combination with cisplatin. Received: 14 June 1997 / Accepted: 18 September 1997     

Phase II study of sequential topotecan and etoposide in patients with intermediate grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group study

Preliminary results indicate that inhibitors of the nuclear enzyme topoisomerase (topo) I, such as topotecan, may be active in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Pre-clinical studies have shown sequential administration of a topo I and II inhibitor has supra-additive anti-tumor effects in some model systems, and that greater cytotoxicity occurs if the topo I inhibitor is given first. We enrolled, 22 eligible patients with relapsed or refractory intermediate grade NHL in a phase II study ofsequential administration of topotecan 1.25 mg/m2 days 1-5 and etoposide 50 mg po b.i.d. days 6-12, every 28 days without G-CSF. Most patients had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and all had received only one prior regimen (CHOP, 20 patients, or equivalent, 2 patients). Patients with stable or responding disease were allowed to proceed to high-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplant after 2 cycles of therapy. The 22 patients received a total of 62 cycles of topotecan + etoposide (median 2, range 1-6), and 4/22 completed all six planned cycles. Hematologic toxicity was significant and resulted in incomplete etoposide dosing in half of all cycles in 16/22 patients. Nineteen of twenty-two patients had grade 3/4 neutropenia, 12 had grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, and 6 grade 3/4 anemia. Eleven patients had at least one episode of febrile neutropenia or had documented infection. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild. Four patients had a partial response (PR) (18.2%), nine had stable disease and seven progressed; three patients with stable disease went on to ABMT. The combination of topotecan and etoposide as given in this study has modest activity in relapsed/refractory aggressive histology NHL, and produces marked myelosuppression. Other doses and schedules combining topo I and II inhibitors, or topo I inhibitors with alkylating agents, should be explored with the addition of hematopoietic growth factors in this patient population.     

Combination of N,N',N"-triethylenethiophosphoramide and cyclophosphamide in vitro and in vivo

In vitro and in vivo studies with the drug combination thioTEPA and cyclophosphamide (CPA) were carried out using the MCF-7 human breast carcinoma cell line and the EMT6 mouse mammary carcinoma cell line. In vitro, survival curves were essentially linear. The EMT6 cell line was less sensitive to thioTEPA than the MCF-7 cell line, with concentrations which reduce cell survival to 10% of 440 and 140 microM, respectively. The response of both cell lines to 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide was similar. Simultaneous and immediate sequential treatments with these drugs produced supraadditive cell killing of both cell lines, although the magnitude of the supraadditivity was greater in the MCF-7 cell line than in the EMT6 cell line. Both of these drugs appeared to be as effective as thiol-depleting agents as is diethyl maleate. By DNA alkaline elution, there was a pattern of increasing DNA cross-linking similar to the increasing levels of cytotoxicity of this drug combination with increasing thioTEPA concentrations. In the EMT6 tumor in vivo, the maximally tolerated combination therapy (5 mg/kg x 6 thioTEPA and 100 mg/kg x 3 CPA) produced about 25 days of tumor growth delay which was not significantly different than expected for additivity of the individual drugs. The survival of EMT6 tumor cells after treatment of the animals with various single doses of thioTEPA and CPA was assayed. Tumor cell killing by thioTEPA produced a very steep, linear survival curve through 5 logs. The tumor cell survival curve for CPA out to 500 mg/kg gave linear tumor cell kill through almost 4 logs. In all cases, the combination treatment tumor cell survivals fell well within the envelope of additivity. Both of these drugs are somewhat less toxic toward bone marrow cells by the granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming unit in vitro assay method than to tumor cells. The combination treatments were subadditive or additive in bone marrow granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming unit killing. When bone marrow is the dose-limiting tissue, there is a therapeutic advantage to the use of this drug combination.     

表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂ZD1839与伊利替康联合效应的实验研究

目的 探讨ZD1839与伊利替康的活性代谢产物7-乙基-10羟基-喜树碱（SN38）联合的最佳方案及其机制。方法 以药物联合效应测定方法,评价ZD1839和SN38不同给药顺序对人结肠癌细胞HT-29和LoVo的抑制作用;以Western blot和免疫共沉淀方法,分析ZD1839与化疗不同联合方案对各自靶蛋白及其下游分子表达的影响;以流式细胞仪测定不同联合方案对细胞周期的影响;以组蛋白相关的DNA碎片分析,比较不同方案对细胞凋亡指数的影响。结果 先SN38后ZD1839的序贯给药方案表现出明显的协同作用;反之,则表现为拈抗作用。SN38明显抑制细胞拓扑异构酶-1（Topo-1）活性;ZDl839不影响表皮生长因子受体（EGFR）的表达,但能抑制EGFR的磷酸化。与SN38单药相比,SN38联合ZDl839对Topo-1的抑制无增强;与单药ZD1839相比,联合方案对EGFR、MAPK磷酸化的抑制作用无增强,但ZD1839、SN38同时给药,和先SN38后ZD1839序贯给药对AKT的抑制有所增强。同时,联合方案对细胞周期分布的改变影响明显。ZD1839可明显维持化疗诱导的DNA损伤和细胞凋亡。结论 先SN38后ZD1839序贯给药可能是治疗结肠癌的最佳联合模式。     

Therapeutic uses of topotecan for thoracic malignancies

Topotecan, a topoisomerase 1 inhibitor (topo1-i), is a semi-synthetic derivative of camptothecan with well-established cytotoxic properties. It is licensed for the treatment of relapsed, sensitive small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and for second line treatment in ovarian cancer. Studies have also shown this drug to be an effective first line treatment for SCLC with either cisplatin or in combination with a topoisomerase 2 inhibitor (topo2-i), etoposide; both combinations have shown similar efficacy. Oral and parenteral formulations of topotecan have proven to be equivocal in relapsed SCLC patients. The parenteral form showed reduced rates of severe haematological toxicities and better symptom control than an anthracycline combination (CAV). In relapsed SCLC, a randomised phase III trial of oral topotecan versus best supportive care showed a statistically significant increase in overall survival. In the second line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), oral topotecan was not inferior to the current standard iv docetaxel for 1 year survival rates. Worthwhile potential investigations include combining oral topotecan with other oral agents to design treatments for different lines of therapy. The new oral formulation of topotecan also lends itself to testing with small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The myelosuppressive toxicity profile needs to be vigorously monitored and managed. The trials with oral topotecan have also highlighted the need to reassess the utility of the terms ‘sensitive’ and ‘resistant’ in the selection of patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer.     

Interaction between gemcitabine and topotecan in human non-small-cell lung cancer cells: effects on cell survival, cell cycle and pharmacogenetic profile

The pyrimidine analogue gemcitabine is an established effective agent in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The present study investigates whether gemcitabine would be synergistic with the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan against the NSCLC A549 and Calu-6 cells. Cells were treated with gemcitabine and topotecan for 1 h and the type of drug interaction was assessed using the combination index (CI). Cell cycle alterations were analysed by flow cytometry, while apoptosis was examined by the occurrence of DNA internucleosomal fragmentation, nuclear condensation and caspase-3 activation. Moreover, the possible involvement of the PI3K-Akt signalling pathway was investigated by the measurement of Akt phosphorylation. Finally, quantitative, real-time PCR (QRT-PCR) was used to study modulation of the gemcitabine-activating enzyme deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) and the cellular target enzyme ribonucleotide reductase (RR). In results, it was found that simultaneous and sequential topotecan --> gemcitabine treatments were synergistic, while the reverse sequence was antagonistic in both cell lines. DNA fragmentation, nuclear condensation and enhanced caspase-3 activity demonstrated that the drug combination markedly increased apoptosis in comparison with either single agent, while cell cycle analysis showed that topotecan increased cells in S phase. Furthermore, topotecan treatment significantly decreased the amount of the activated form of Akt, and enhanced the expression of dCK (+155.0 and +115.3% in A549 and Calu-6 cells, respectively), potentially facilitating gemcitabine activity. In conclusion, these results indicate that the combination of gemcitabine and topotecan displays schedule-dependent activity in vitro against NSCLC cells. The gemcitabine --> topotecan sequence is antagonistic while drug synergism is obtained with the simultaneous and the sequential topotecan --> gemcitabine combinations, which are associated with induction of decreased Akt phosphorylation and increased dCK expression.     

Phase I trial of sequential topotecan followed by etoposide in adults with myeloid leukemia: a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study.

Prolonged exposure to a topoisomerase I inhibitor may increase expression of topoisomerase II, making cells more susceptible inhibitors of that enzyme. This study was undertaken to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a topotecan/topoisomerase II inhibitor sequential combination that may be active in acute leukemia, and to evaluate the effects of in vivo exposure to topotecan on topoisomerase II levels in leukemic blast cells as measured by image cytometry. Patients who were eligible for this phase I study had relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (< or = 2 prior regimens) or CML blast crisis (0 or 1 prior regimen). Topotecan was given as a 5 day continuous i.v. infusion and was to be escalated through three levels (1.5, 1.75 and 2.0 mg/m2 day), followed by etoposide at two dose levels (100 and 150 mg/m2) i.v. bolus days 6, 7 and 8. Topoisomerase IIalpha levels in leukemic blasts from bone marrow were measured by image cytometry prior to starting treatment, on day 5 of topotecan infusion and on day 28; and daily during topotecan in peripheral blood blasts. Dose-limiting toxicity was seen in two of six patients at the first dose level (topotecan 1.5 mg/m2/day, etoposide 100 mg/m2/day; > or = grade 3 mucositis in both cases). This cohort was expanded to 10 patients; no further non-hematologic dose-limiting toxicity was observed, but given the extent of toxicity seen, further dose escalation was judged not to be feasible. Topo IIalpha levels increased in peripheral blood blasts during the first 72 h of topotecan infusion and returned to near baseline by day 5, whereas levels appeared to decrease in bone marrow blasts by day 5 compared to pretreatment. One complete hematologic and cytogenetic remission in a patient with CML blast crisis was observed in the 10 patients evaluable for response. The sequential administration of topotecan 1.5 mg/m2/day continuous infusion for 5 days followed by etoposide 100 mg/m2/day x 3 is the recommended phase II dose for this schedule. Topotecan increases topo IIalpha expression in vivo in leukemia cells, but levels of the enzyme are cell cycle dependent. Pharmacodynamic evaluation of the sequential or combination administration of novel antileukemic agents may help improve treatment strategies in acute leukemia.     

Topotecan-triggered degradation of topoisomerase I is p53-dependent and impacts cell survival

The anticancer drug topotecan belongs to the group of topoisomerase I (topo I) inhibitors. In the presence of topotecan, topo I cleaves the DNA but is unable to religate the single-strand break. This leads to stabilization of topo I-DNA-bound complexes and the accumulation of DNA strand breaks that may interfere with DNA replication. The molecular mechanism of controlling the repair of topo I-DNA covalent complexes and its impact on sensitivity of cells to topotecan is largely unknown. Here, we used mouse embryonic fibroblasts expressing wild-type p53 and deficient in p53, in order to elucidate the role of p53 in topotecan-induced cell death. We show that p53-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts are significantly more sensitive to topotecan than wild-type cells, displaying a higher frequency of topotecan-induced apoptosis and DNA strand breaks. Treatment of p53 wild-type cells with pifithrin-alpha, an inhibitor of the trans-activating activity of p53, caused reversal of the phenotype, making wild-type cells more sensitive to topotecan. Upon topotecan treatment, topo I was degraded in wild-type but not in p53-deficient cells. Topo I degradation was attenuated by the proteosomal inhibitor MG132. Similar data were obtained with human glioblastoma cells. U138 cells (p53 mutated) were significantly more sensitive to topotecan than U87 cells (p53 wild-type). Furthermore, U87 cells showed significant degradation of topo I upon topotecan treatment, whereas in U138 cells, this response was abrogated. Topo I degradation was again attenuated by pifithrin-alpha. The data suggests that p53 causes resistance of cells to topo I inhibitors due to stimulation of topotecan-triggered topo I degradation which may impact topotecan-based cancer therapy.     

Synergy of topotecan in combination with vincristine for treatment of pediatric solid tumor xenografts.

Topotecan and vincristine were evaluated alone or in combination against 13 independent xenografts and 1 vincristine-resistant derivative, representing childhood neuroblastoma (n = 6), rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 5), or brain tumors (n = 3). Topotecan was given by i.v. bolus on a schedule found previously to be optimal. Drug was administered daily for 5 days on 2 consecutive weeks with cycles repeated every 21 days over a period of 8 weeks. Doses of topotecan ranged from 0.16 to 1.5 mg/kg to simulate clinically achievable topotecan lactone plasma systemic exposures. Vincristine was administered i.v. every 7 days at a fixed dose of 1 mg/kg. Given as a single agent, vincristine induced complete responses (CRs) in all mice bearing two rhabdomyosarcomas (Rh28 and Rh30) and some CRs in Rh12-bearing mice (57%) but relatively few CRs (<29%) in other tumors. As a single agent, topotecan induced CR in a low proportion of tumor lines. A dose-response model with a logit link function was used to investigate whether the combination of topotecan and vincristine resulted in greater than expected responses compared with the activity of the agents when administered alone. Only CR was used to evaluate tumor responses. The combination resulted in significantly greater than expected CRs than individual agents in nine tumor lines (four neuroblastoma, three brain tumors, and two rhabdomyosarcomas). Similar event-free (failure) distributions were shown in SJ-GBM2 glioblastoma xenografts, whether vincristine was administered on day 1 or day 5 of each topotecan course. To determine whether the increased antitumor activity with the combination was attributable to a change in drug disposition, extensive pharmacokinetic studies were performed. However, little or no interaction between these two agents was determined. Toxicity of the combination was marked by prolonged thrombocytopenia and decreased hemoglobin. However, approximately 75 and 80% of the maximum tolerated dose of each single agent, topotecan (1.5 mg/kg) or vincristine (1 mg/kg), could be given in combination, resulting in a combination toxicity index of approximately 1.5. These results show that the therapeutic effect of combining topotecan with vincristine was greater than additive in most tumor models of childhood solid tumors, and toxicity data suggest that this can be administered to mice with only moderate reduction in the dose levels for each agent.     

131I]meta-iodobenzylguanidine and topotecan combination treatment of tumors expressing the noradrenaline transporter.

PURPOSE: Both [(131)I]meta-iodobenzylguanidine ([(131)I]MIBG) and the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan are effective as single-agent treatments of neuroblastoma. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of [(131)I]MIBG in combination with topotecan in vitro and in vivo. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The cell lines used were SK-N-BE(2c) (human neuroblastoma) and UVW/NAT (glioma cell line transfected with the noradrenaline transporter gene). Three different treatment schedules were assessed: topotecan given before (schedule 1), after (schedule 2), or simultaneously (schedule 3) with [(131)I]MIBG. DNA strand breakage was evaluated by comet assay, and cytotoxicity was determined by clonogenic survival. Efficacy was also measured by growth delay of tumor xenografts in nude mice. RESULTS: Combination schedules 2 and 3 caused more cytotoxicity than schedule 1. Similarly, significant DNA damage was observed following treatment schedules 2 and 3 (P < 0.005) but not schedule 1. The mean number of days for a doubling in volume of SK-N-BE(2c) tumors and a 10-fold increase in volume of UVW/NAT tumors were 10.4 and 18.6 (untreated), 19.7 and 25.3 (topotecan alone), 22.8 and 31.9 ([(131)I]MIBG alone), 26.3 and 37.1 (combination schedule 1), 34.3 and 49.7 (combination schedule 2), and 53.2 and >71 (combination schedule 3), respectively. The highest rate of cure of both xenografts was observed following treatment with combination schedule 3. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of topotecan and [(131)I]MIBG compared with either treatment alone gave rise to greater than additive DNA damage, clonogenic cell kill, and tumor growth delay. These effects were dependent on the scheduling of the two agents.     

A phase I clinical trial of sequentially administered doxorubicin and topotecan in refractory solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To determine whether agents that target topoisomerase I and II could be administered sequentially. DESIGN: A Phase I study was conducted to evaluate sequential treatment with bolus IV doxorubicin followed 48 h later by topotecan given as a 30-min i.v. infusion on 3 consecutive days, with additional cycles of therapy repeated every 3 weeks. Characteristics of the 22 patients entered into the study were: 13 male and 9 female; median age, 49.5 (range 33-66) years; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, 0-1; and normal cardiac, hematological, hepatic, and renal function. All patients had received prior therapy (median >or=2 prior regimens). RESULTS: The maximum tolerated dose of the combination was 25 mg/m(2) doxorubicin and 5.25 mg/m(2) topotecan (1.75 mg/m(2)/day x 3). Neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity. Attempts to further escalate the dose using 5 microg/kg granulocyte colony-stimulating factor proved unsuccessful because of thrombocytopenia. Among the 17 patients who were evaluable for response, 6 had a partial response, and 4 showed evidence of disease stabilization. The partial responses occurred in patients with small cell lung cancer (3 of 7), non-small cell lung cancer (1 of 6), esophageal adenocarcinoma (1 of 2), and ovarian carcinoma (1 of 1), and it lasted for 3-6 months. Administration of doxorubicin 2 days before topotecan did not alter topotecan pharmacokinetics. Changes in topoisomerase mRNA levels were observed during chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The sequential combination of doxorubicin followed by topotecan is highly active in several chemotherapy refractory long, ovary, and esophageal cancers. Despite significant neutropenia, toxicity is manageable and well tolerated. Phase II trials to further evaluate the efficacy of this promising combination regimen against non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and lung cancer have been initiated.     

Phase I clinical trial of weekly combined topotecan and irinotecan

Combining antineoplastic analogues may increase efficacy by increasing the serum and intracellular concentration of the cytotoxic moiety shared by the analogues. Topotecan and irinotecan are two camptothecan analogues that are active in different human tumors (topotecan in ovary; irinotecan in colon) and in different experimental tumor systems. These data suggest that different mechanisms of drug resistance may be operative for the two agents, and if incomplete cross-resistance exists between analogues, concomitant administration may be advantageous. The objectives of this phase I study were 1) to determine in a phase trial design whether topotecan and irinotecan administered concomitantly on a weekly schedule can be delivered at the same dose intensity as that of single-agent topotecan or irinotecan delivery; and 2) to determine whether hematologic and/or nonhematologic toxicity is increased with topotecan and irinotecan administered together as a prelude to a possible phase II trial in responsive tumor categories. Irinotecan was administered for 30 to 45 minutes weekly x 4 at four dose levels: 50, 75, 100, and 125 mg/m(2)/wk. Topotecan was administered for 30 minutes (after irinotecan administration) at two dose levels within each of the irinotecan dose levels (1.0 and 1.5 mg/m(2)). Concomitant single-dose granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was used for leukocyte counts between 1,000 cells/mm(3) and 3,500 cells/mm(3) to maintain schedule. Maximum tolerated dosage (MTD) for the topotecan and irinotecan combination was defined as that which permitted 4 weeks of topotecan and irinotecan administration with G-CSF at or near the dose intensity reported for each single agent. Twenty-one patients received 32 4-week cycles. Dose-limiting toxicity was hematologic with grade IV leukopenia and neutropenia occurring at all dose levels. There was no apparent increase in the diarrhea syndrome associated with irinotecan. The MTD for irinotecan (at 125 mg/m(2)/wk) is the same MTD as with single-agent irinotecan use. The MTD for concomitant topotecan (1.5 mg/m(2)/wk) is 60% of the single-agent topotecan dose for the 5-day topotecan schedule (at 2.5 mg/m(2)/wk) but only 30% of the single-agent topotecan dose for the weekly schedule (5 mg/m(2)/wk). The topoisomerase I inhibitor dose is increased minimally when the analogues are administered concomitantly on a weekly schedule. Comparative trials of single-agent topotecan and irinotecan versus the combination of topotecan and irinotecan would be necessary to provide the proof of principle that combining analogues can increase therapeutic effectiveness.     

Phase I study of PARP inhibitor ABT-888 in combination with topotecan in adults with refractory solid tumors and lymphomas

A phase I trial of ABT-888 (veliparib), a PARP inhibitor, in combination with topotecan, a topoisomerase I-targeted agent, was carried out to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of the combination in patients with refractory solid tumors and lymphomas. Varying schedules and doses of intravenous topotecan in combination with ABT-888 (10 mg) administered orally twice a day (BID) were evaluated. Plasma and urine pharmacokinetics were assessed and levels of poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) and the DNA damage marker γH2AX were measured in tumor and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Twenty-four patients were enrolled. Significant myelosuppression limited the ability to coadminister ABT-888 with standard doses of topotecan, necessitating dose reductions. Preclinical studies using athymic mice carrying human tumor xenografts also informed schedule changes. The MTD was established as topotecan 0.6 mg/m2/d and ABT-888 10 mg BID on days one to five of 21-day cycles. Topotecan did not alter the pharmacokinetics of ABT-888. A more than 75% reduction in PAR levels was observed in 3 paired tumor biopsy samples; a greater than 50% reduction was observed in PBMCs from 19 of 23 patients with measurable levels. Increases in γH2AX response in circulating tumor cells (CTC) and PBMCs were observed in patients receiving ABT-888 with topotecan. We show a mechanistic interaction of a PARP inhibitor, ABT-888, with a topoisomerase I inhibitor, topotecan, in PBMCs, tumor, and CTCs. Results of this trial reveal that PARP inhibition can modulate the capacity to repair topoisomerase I-mediated DNA damage in the clinic.     

Interaction of ionizing radiation with topotecan in two human tumor cell lines

The effect of topotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, on ionizing radiation-induced cytotoxicity was studied in 2 human tumor cell lines characterized by a different expression of the target enzyme. The cytotoxicity of topotecan alone or in combination with radiation was assessed in exponentially growing non-small-cell lung cancer (H460) and glioblastoma (GBM) cells using the colony-forming assay. An isobologram method was used to evaluate the treatment interaction. An apparent supra-additive effect in cell killing following drug-radiation-combined treatment was observed only in GBM cells exposed to topotecan for 24 hr. In the case of H460 cells, interaction varied from a strong intra-additive effect at low radiation doses to a slight supra-additive effect when cells were exposed to radiation doses greater than 3 Gy. Northern blot analysis indicated that topoisomerase I expression in H460 cells was 8-fold higher than that of GBM cells. Although the H460 cell line exhibited an increased sensitivity to topotecan, only in the GBM cell line (which expressed a lower level of topoisomerase I) did the drug potentiate the radiation cytotoxicity. The observation that the radiosensitization by topotecan was related to topoisomerase I level is consistent with a putative role of the enzyme in processes involved in the repair of radiation damage. It is conceivable that the modulation of enzyme function results in an effective reduction of cellular capability for repair of radiation damage only if the enzyme is not over-expressed. Although a precise role of topoisomerase I in the cellular response to ionizing radiations (in particular, in DNA repair) remains to be documented, such results suggest the potential interest of topoisomerase I inhibitors in combination with radiation therapy for tumors expressing low topoisomerase I levels. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Preclinical and phase I study of oxaliplatin and topotecan in combination in human cancer.

BACKGROUND: DNA damage caused by platinum agents is frequently followed by induction of topoisomerase I, providing a rationale for use of platinum-based compounds with topoisomerase I inhibitors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied the effect of a sequential schedule of oxaliplatin on day I and topotecan on days 2-5, in human colon and ovarian cancer cells in vitro, in nude mice bearing human cancer xenografts and finally in cancer patients in a phase I trial. RESULTS: We demonstrated a supra-additive effect of this combination on inhibition of colony formation and induction of apoptosis in vitro. We then demonstrated that the two agents in combination markedly inhibit tumor growth in nude mice. We translated these results into a clinical setting, conducting a phase I study in cancer patients with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1 and topotecan at doses escalating from 0.5 to 1.5 mg/m2 on days 2-5. Sixty cycles of treatment were administered to 18 patients affected prevalently by ovarian and colorectal cancer. Combination with topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 caused a dose-limiting toxicity. Therefore the maximum tolerated dose of topotecan was 1.25 mg/m2, at which six patients experienced a mild hematological and gastrointestinal toxicity. We also obtained evidence of clinical activity, particularly in ovarian cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide a solid biological and clinical rationale for a phase II trial at the recommended doses of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 and topotecan 1.25 mg/m2, possibly in ovarian cancer patients.     

Development, characterization and therapy of a disseminated model of childhood neuroblastoma in SCID mice

PURPOSE: To develop a highly reproducible model of disseminated childhood neuroblastoma in mice to allow secondary evaluation of therapeutics against microscopic disseminated disease. METHODS: CB17/Icr SCID were injected i.v. with 10(3) to 5 x 10(6) human NB-1691 neuroblastoma cells. NB-1691 cells were detected by PCR for synaptophysin and tyrosine hydroxylase in peripheral blood, and bone marrow. Therapeutic studies evaluated topotecan and vincristine as single agents or in combination. Topotecan was administered i.v. daily for 5 days on two consecutive weeks. Courses were repeated every 21 days for three cycles. Vincristine (1 mg/kg) was administered i.v. every 7 days for nine consecutive weeks. Treatment started 11-21 days after tumor cell inoculation. RESULTS: Following injection of > or = 1 x 10(5) cells 100% of mice developed disease. Mice inoculated with 10(7) cells survived a median of 42 days. Survival time was a linear function of the cell inoculum. At autopsy, gross tumor was routinely detected in many organs in particular liver, ovaries, kidneys and adrenals. NB-1691 cells were detected by PCR in peripheral blood, and bone marrow. Immunohistochemical staining showed that lesions were strongly positive for synaptophysin, chromogranin A and negative for leukocyte common antigen. Topotecan (0.6 mg/kg) alone extended median survival from 44 days (controls) to 95 days. When treatment was started 21 days after inoculation of NB-1691 cells, topotecan extended median survival from 39 days (controls) to 91 and 99 days at dose levels of 0.3 and 0.6 mg/kg, respectively. Vincristine (1 mg/kg) extended survival by a median of 9.5 days. In combination with vincristine (1 mg/kg), median survival was increased to 141 days (topotecan 0.6 mg/kg) and 159 days (topotecan 1.0 mg/kg). CONCLUSION: This model of disseminated neuroblastoma is highly reproducible. As this model may more closely simulate childhood disease it may be a valuable adjunct in developing new approaches to advanced stage, poor prognosis neuroblastoma.     

Variation in topoisomerase I gene copy number as a mechanism for intrinsic drug sensitivity.

DNA topoisomerase I (topo I) is the principle target for camptothecin and its derivatives such as SN38. Levels of topo I expression vary widely between and within tumour types and the basis for this is poorly understood. We have used fluorescence in situ hybridisation to detect the topo I locus in a panel of breast and colon cancer cell lines. This approach has identified a range of topo I gene copies from 1 to 6 between the cell lines as a result of DNA amplification, polysomy and isochromosome formation. Topo I gene copy number was highly correlated with topo I expression, (rs = 0.92), and inversely correlated to sensitivity to a 1 h exposure to SN38 (rs = -0.904). This illustrates the significant impact of altered topo I gene copy number on intrinsic drug sensitivity and influences potential mechanisms for acquisition of drug resistance.     

A phase I trial defining the maximum tolerated systemic exposure of topotecan in combination with Carboplatin and Etoposide in extensive stage small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: Topotecan is active in relapsed small cell lung cancer; thus, its addition to the standard carboplatin-etoposide regimen may improve outcomes in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients. Significant interpatient variability in the topotecan systemic exposure results when it is dosed based on body surface area (mg/m2). The purpose of this Phase I trial was to determine the maximally tolerated systemic exposure (MTSE) of topotecan in combination with carboplatin and etoposide. METHODS: Thirty-four chemotherapy-na?ve ES-SCLC patients received topotecan in combination with carboplatin AUC 5 mg/mL*min and oral etoposide 100 mg/m2/day. Topotecan was administered as a 30-minute infusion either on Days 1-5 or Days 1-3 and the dosage was individualized to attain a topotecan lactone AUC range (ng/mL*hr) in successive patient cohorts from 7 to 23; 24 to 36; 37 to 53; 54 to 66. RESULTS: The majority (67 percent) of the measured topotecan AUCs were within target range. Overall, 8 of 34 patients experienced Cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), either neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Carboplatin administration prior to topotecan resulted in 2 of 6 patients having Cycle 1 DLT. When the administration sequence was changed (topotecan, carboplatin, etoposide), Cycle 1 hematologic toxicity decreased; however, the maximum topotecan lactone AUC of 24-36 ng/mL*hr (median dose 0.82 mg/m2) had significant cumulative hematologic toxicity. The number of topotecan doses were reduced from 5 to 3, which resulted in a maximum topotecan lactone AUC of 37 to 53 ng/mL*hr with only 1 of 6 patients having Cycle 1 DLT. Overall response rate was 71 percent with median survival of 10.8 months. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to target topotecan lactone AUC in adult ES-SCLC patients. However, this triplet regimen resulted in considerable hematologic toxicity and has a median survival comparable to carboplatin-etoposide. Alternative, less toxic regimens should be investigated for improving survival in ES-SCLC.     

Interaction of topoisomerase I inhibitors with radiation in cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II)-sensitive and -resistantcells In Vitro and in the fsaiic fibrosarcoma In Vivo

The cytotoxicity of the topoisomerase-I inhibitors, camptothecin and topotecan, toward the SCC-25 human head-and-neck squamous-carcinoma cells and the SCC-25/CDDP sub-line made resistant to cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) was assessed alone and in combination with radiation. Topotecan was less cytotoxic than camptothecin in cell culture and the SCC-25/CDDP cell line was more sensitive to either topoisomerase-I inhibitor than was the parental SCC-25 cell line. Both camptothecin and topotecan were effective radiation sensitizers of hypoxic SCC-25 and SCC-25/CDDP cells under normal pH or acidic pH conditions. Sensitizer-enhancement ratios ranged between I.5 and I.6 for hypoxic SCC-25 cells and between I.3 and I.5 for hypoxic SCC-25/CDDP cells. When the ability of campothecin or topotecan to sensitize the FSallC fibrosarcoma to single-dose radiation was assessed using the tumor-cell-survival assay, a sensitizer-enhancement ratio of I.2 was found with each drug. However, using tumor growth delay of the FSallC fibrosarcoma to determine the effect of camptothecin or topotecan to enhance the efficacy of a daily fractionated radiation regimen, topotecan produced a sensitizer-enhancement ratio of I.4, while that for camptothecin was I.2. These results indicate that topoisomerase-I inhibitors may retain activity in CDDP-resistant cells and may be effective adjuncts to radiation therapy.