Results of the Minnesota randomized prospective trial of cyclosporine versus azathioprine-antilymphocyte globulin for immunosuppression in renal allograft recipients

Between September 26, 1980 and June 8, 1984, 246 splenectomized, transfused renal allograft recipients were randomized to treatment with either cyclosporine (CsA)-prednisone (n = 131) or azathioprine (Aza)-prednisone-antilymphocyte globulin (n = 115). On December 31, 1984, actuarial patient survival rates at three years were 89% in the CsA group and 90% in the Aza group, and the corresponding graft survival rates were 82% and 79% (statistically insignificant differences). The results were also compared separately in diabetic and nondiabetic patients and in recipients of related and cadaver donor grafts; only in the subgroup of diabetic recipients of cadaver kidneys were the differences in graft survival rates significantly different between CsA- and Aza-treated patients. The incidence of posttransplant acute tubular necrosis was similar in CsA- and Aza-treated patients (33% v 27%), but the duration was significantly longer in CsA- than in Aza-treated recipients (15.7 +/- 18.4 v 7.7 +/- 3.0 days). Rejection episodes and infections (particularly CMV) occurred significantly less frequently in CsA- than in Aza-treated patients. Mean serum creatinine levels were significantly higher in CsA- than in Aza-treated recipients (2.0 +/- 0.6 v 1.5 +/- 0.5 mg/dl). Treatment of hypertension and hyperkalemia was required significantly more frequently in the CsA-treated patients than in the Aza-treated patients. Initial mean hospitalization time was significantly shorter in the CsA group than in the Aza group (15.6 +/- 9.5 v 19.8 +/- 10.7 days). In the CsA group, 19% of the patients were switched to Aza and 35% had Aza added to their regimen with a concomitant lowering of the CsA dose because of nephrotoxicity. The results of our randomized trial are at variance with those of others in that the graft survival rates in our trial were not different between CsA and Aza-treated patients, primarily because our conventionally-treated patients had a higher graft survival rate than in the other trials. The advantages of CsA (fewer rejection episodes, fewer infections, shorter hospitalization) outweigh the disadvantages (higher serum creatinine, more hypertension), and thus we believe it should be used in most renal allograft recipients, perhaps in combination with Aza so that a lower dose of CsA can be used and the side effects minimized--a regimen that we are currently evaluating.     

A single institution, randomized, prospective trial of cyclosporin versus azathioprine-antilymphocyte globulin for immunosuppression in renal allograft recipients.

Between September 26, 1980 and December 31, 1983, 230 splenectomized, transfused renal allograft recipients were randomized to treatment with either cyclosporin-prednisone (N = 121, 68 diabetic and 53 nondiabetic recipients; 73 cadaver and 48 related donor grafts) or azathioprine-prednisone-antilymphocyte globulin (N = 109, 61 diabetic and 48 nondiabetic recipients; 69 cadaver and 40 related donor grafts). The results were analyzed on March 31, 1984. Actuarial patient survival rates at 2 years were 88% in the cyclosporin and 91% in the azathioprine groups (p = 0.649). Graft survival rates at 2 years were 82% in all cyclosporin and 77% in all azathioprine-treated recipients (p = 0.150); the corresponding figures in the recipients of related donor grafts were 87% vs. 83% (p = 0.656), and in the recipients of cadaver donor grafts were 78% vs. 73% (p = 0.178). The 2-year graft survival rates were 81% in cyclosporin and 74% in azathioprine-treated diabetic recipients (p = 0.150) and 83% in cyclosporin and 81% in azathioprine-treated nondiabetic recipients (p = 0.604). Within the cyclosporin and azathioprine treatment groups, the differences in graft survival rates between diabetic and nondiabetic recipients were not significant (p = 0.822 and 0.423, respectively). Although there were no significant differences in graft survival rates, the cumulative incidence of rejection episodes within the first post-transplant year was significantly lower in the cyclosporin (34%) than in the azathioprine (60%) treated recipients (p = 0.001). In recipients of technically successful cadaver kidney grafts, the incidence of acute tubular necrosis (ATN) was 31% in cyclosporin and 30% in azathioprine-treated recipients (p = 0.822). Graft survival rates in azathioprine- and cyclosporin-treated recipients who did or did not undergo ATN were 72% vs. 89% (p = 0.011). The mean (+/- S.D.) serum creatinine levels (mg/dl) at 1 year were higher in cyclosporin (2.0 +/- 0.6) than in azathioprine (1.5 +/- 0.5) treated recipients (p = less than 0.001). A reduction in cyclosporin dose because of nephrotoxicity was required in 96 of the cyclosporin-treated patients (70%), and 25 were switched to treatment with azathioprine (21%). The incidence of all infections in cyclosporin-treated patients was approximately half of that in azathioprine-treated patients, and only nine per cent of the cyclosporin-treated patients were diagnosed to have cytomegalovirus infections during the first post-transplant year vs. 28% in azathioprine-treated patients (p = 0.002).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Thromboembolic complications in renal allograft recipients. A report from the prospective randomized study of cyclosporine versus azathioprine-antilymphocyte globulin

The incidence of arterial and venous thromboembolic complications was compared in 224 renal allograft recipients who were prospectively randomized and stratified by risk to treatment with either cyclosporine-prednisone (CsA-P) (n = 117) or azathioprine-prednisone-antilymphocyte globulin (AZA-P-ALG) (n = 107). Thirteen CsA patients (11%) had 22 thromboembolic events, while 19 AZA patients (18%) had 24 events (P = 0.22). There was no significant difference between the 2 regimens in the number of patients with each type of venous or arterial event or in the number of patients with multiple or lethal events. The incidence of "minor" complications (all except myocardial infarction and stroke) in the related donor subgroup (n = 85) and the overall incidence of thromboembolism in the diabetic subgroup (n = 125) were both significantly higher in AZA-treated patients (P = 0.008 and 0.045, respectively). Thus, CsA immunosuppression does not appear to be a risk factor for thromboembolic disease, and it may in fact lower the incidence of thromboembolism in diabetic renal allograft recipients.     

Sequential therapy--a prospective randomized trial of MALG versus OKT3 for prophylactic immunosuppression in cadaver renal allograft recipients.

We prospectively studied the use of prophylactic Minnesota antilymphocyte globulin vs. OKT3 in kidney transplant recipients. Between 7/1/87 and 9/1/90, 138 adult kidney and 35 kidney-pancreas recipients were randomized after stratification for age (18-49 vs. greater than or equal to 50), diabetes (diabetic vs. nondiabetic), transplant number (1 vs. greater than 1) and, for retransplants, the length of survival of the first graft (less than 1 year vs. greater than or equal to 1 year), and then randomized to receive 7 days of either MALG (20 mg/kg/day) or OKT3 (5 mg/day). Immunosuppression was otherwise identical in both groups; prednisone and azathioprine started on the day of surgery, and cyclosporine started on postoperative day 6. Minimum follow-up was 9 months. There was no difference in one- and two-year actuarial patient or graft survival rates, incidence of rejection, or serum creatinine level. MALG was associated with a higher incidence of cytomegalovirus; it was statistically significant in the subgroup of CMV seronegative recipients of kidneys from seropositive donors (P less than .05). OKT3 was more expensive and was associated with significantly more side effects: fever (P less than .0001), dyspnea (P = .04), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (P = .02).     

Long-term, low-dose cyclosporine treatment of renal allograft recipients. A randomized trial

Ninety-two adult renal allograft recipients, receiving baseline immunosuppression with CsA and prednisone, were assigned randomly to one of the following regimens. CsA was discontinued (D/C group) in 47 recipients who were then maintained on Aza and prednisone; or Aza was added to continued low-dose CsA and prednisone (triple drug [TD] group) in 45 patients. Entry into the study required an absence of rejection and a stable creatinine for at least four months prior to randomization. The mean month of randomization was 8.34 +/- 2.9 for the D/C group, and 7.2 +/- 3.2 for the TD group. Following randomization, a significantly greater rate of rejection (P less than .01) was observed in the D/C group (40%) than in the TD group (13%). With a mean follow-up of 30 months, 41/47 of D/C allografts (87.2%) and 39/45 TD allografts (86.6%) were functioning. Nevertheless, rejection had a persistent adverse effect on allograft function, in both the D/C and TD groups, up to 36 months following randomization. Parameters such as donor-type and rejection prior to randomization did not identify recipients at risk for rejection following randomization. Therefore, although the CsA withdrawal regimen might be ideal, the opportunity to select appropriate candidates remained elusive. In contrast, the safety of the TD regimen became apparent. Neither significant nephrotoxicity nor hypertension was observed, and the opportunity for less daily prednisone was evident. Despite its additional cost, the TD regimen utilizing indefinite low-dose CsA, is preferred.     

Antithymocyte globulin in renal transplant recipients. Report of a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Horse antihuman thymocyte globulin (HAHTG) combined with prednisone and azathioprine (lmuran) was used as immunosuppressive therapy in a randomized controlled sutdy in 50 renal allograft recipients. Side effects of HAHTG administration given intravenously were mostly mild. In the treated group, four patients out of 26 died of infectious complications, whereas in the control group, three patients out of 24 died of infectious complications (chi2 = .01,P greater than .05). The graft survival at 18 months was ten of 24 in the control group and ten of 26 in the treated group (chi2 = 1.26, P greater than .05). Cumulative graft survival was 58.3% in the control group and 38.1% in the treated group at 18 months. However, if we consider the people who died with a functioning graft not as graft failure but as if they left the study, then the cumulative graft survival is 64.5% in the control group and 65.9% in the treated group. Thus, the mortality from infective causes and graft survival were not significantly different between the two groups. Hence, we draw the conclusion that use of HAHTG did not exert a beneficial effect on the ultimate outcome.     

Effects of combination cyclosporine/mizoribine immunosuppression on canine renal allograft recipients

Heterotopic renal allografts following bilateral nephrectomies were placed in 21 healthy mongrel dogs. One group of 11 dogs received cyclosporine (5 mg/kg/24 hr, orally), and 1 group of 10 dogs received cyclosporine and mizoribine (5 mg/kg and 3 mg/kg/24 hr, orally). Body weights, blood cell counts, serum chemistry profiles, serum electrolyte levels, urinalysis with cytology and culture, lymphocyte stimulation assays, immunoglobulin levels, whole blood levels of cyclosporine, and serum levels of mizoribine were followed. At the end of each survival period, necropsy and histopathologic examinations were performed. The mean survival time for the cyclosporine group was 12.8 +/- 7 days. The mean survival time for the cyclosporine/mizoribine group was 33.6 +/- 16.4 days, significantly longer (P = .0006) than the cyclosporine group. Death in the cyclosporine/mizoribine group was attributed to the combined effects of renal allograft rejection and development of a mizoribine-dependent enteritis. Serum levels of mizoribine were greater in the last half of the survival period due to compromised renal excretion of the drug. There were no complications due to infection, myelosuppression, or hepatotoxicity. Combination cyclosporine/mizoribine immunosuppression enhanced canine renal allograft survival in this study. Monitoring serum concentrations of mizoribine is imperative to determine toxic (enteritis) levels. Availability of an intravenous form of mizoribine would facilitate immunoregulation during periods of variable intestinal absorption or renal excretion.     

An open-label randomized trial of the safety and efficacy of sirolimus vs. azathioprine in living related renal allograft recipients receiving cyclosporine and prednisone combination

BACKGROUND: The ability of sirolimus (SRL), in combination with reduced exposure of cyclosporine, was investigated to prevent acute rejection and associated side effects. METHODS: Between June 1999 and February 2000, 70 recipients of primary one-haplotype living-related donor renal allografts were randomized to receive SRL (2 mg/d) or azathioprine (AZA) (2 mg/kg/d) combined with cyclosporine and prednisone. The primary end-point was a composite of first occurrence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft loss, or death during the first 3 months after transplantation. RESULTS: From week 4 to month 12, SRL patients received lower cyclosporine (week 4: 364 mg/d vs. 455 mg/d, p = 0.004; month 12: 195 mg/d vs. 255 mg/d, p = 0.038) doses and showed lower cyclosporine concentrations (week 4: 247 ng/mL vs. 309 ng/mL, p = 0.04; month 12: 143 ng/mL vs. 188 ng/mL, p = 0.045). Compared with AZA, SRL patients showed reduced 3-month primary end point (0% vs. 17.1%, p = 0.025), and reduced incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at 3 months (0% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.01) but not at 12 months (11.4% vs. 14.3%, NS). Mean creatinine at 12 months were not different (1.8 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.6 +/- 0.6, p = 0.23). Hyperlipidemia was the only adverse event more frequent among SRL patients (49% vs. 17%, p = 0.01). There were no differences in infections and no malignancies in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of 2 mg fixed doses of SRL, reduced cyclosporine exposure and prednisone was associated with a low incidence of acute rejection and did not result in significantly impaired graft function compared with patients receiving AZA, standard doses of cyclosporine and prednisone.     

The impact of cyclosporine and combination immunosuppression on the incidence of posttransplant diabetes in renal allograft recipients

The incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) was compared in three groups of renal transplant recipients: nondiabetic patients who had been randomized between 1980 and 1983 to receive antilymphoblast globulin (ALG), azathioprine (AZA), and prednisone (P) (group 1) or cyclosporine (CsA) plus prednisone (group 2). Group 3 consisted of a more recent (1984-85) cohort who were given a combination of azathioprine, cyclosporine, and prednisone (+/- ALG). PTDM developed in 20 of 173 previously nondiabetic 18-55-year-old patients. Three of 47 patients (6.4%) in group 1, 4 of 58 patients (6.9%) in group 2, and 13 of 68 patients in group 3 (19.1%) developed PTDM. Thus in the two groups composing the concurrent prospective randomized trial (groups 1 and 2) the incidence of PTDM did not differ. The subsequent patients who were given a combination of ALG, azathioprine, cyclosporine, and prednisone developed a significantly greater incidence of PTDM even though the total dose of cyclosporine and prednisone were lower than in groups 1 and 2. PTDM usually occurred within two months of transplantation, and 11 of 17 patients who initially required insulin are still dependent upon exogenous insulin. The incidence of PTDM was not significantly affected by sex of the recipient, HLA-type, primary renal disease, rejection episodes, primary vs. secondary transplant, or prior splenectomy. The incidence of PTDM is greater in patients older than 45 (34.2% vs. 5.2%), and heavier than 70 kg (21.1% vs. 5.1%); in recipients of cadaveric allografts (15.7% vs. 4.6%); and in patients who were hospitalized for infections (22.4% vs. 4.7%). CsA levels tended to be higher in the group 2 and 3 patients who developed PTDM than in those who remained nondiabetic. One-year actuarial patient survival in those with PTDM was 83.3% vs. 98% (P less than .01) in the nondiabetic and graft survival was 77.1% vs. 87.1% (NS). The combination of Minnesota ALG, azathioprine, cyclosporine, and prednisone appears to predispose older, heavier recipients of cadaver allografts to the development of PTDM. The risk of PTDM must be weighed against the more usual results of improved patient and graft survival using this combination of immunosuppression.     

A randomized trial comparing cyclosporine with antilymphoblast-globulin-azathioprine for renal allograft recipients. Results at 2 1/2-6 years

Between September 1980 and June 1984, 246 splenectomized, transfused renal allograft recipients were stratified according to presence of diabetes and donor source, and randomized to treatment with either cyclosporine (CsA)-prednisone (pred) or antilymphoblast-globulin (ALG--azathioprine (AZA)--prednisone. As of August 1986, mean follow-up is 47 months. Over all, actuarial patient survival is 84% and 83%, respectively at 4 years. Corresponding graft survival is 70% and 63% for CsA-treated and ALG-AZA-treated patients (NS). Within the subgroup of diabetic recipients of cadaver grafts, graft survival is 70% for CsA-treated and 53% for ALG-AZA-treated recipients (P = .035). In the CsA group, 71% required either a significant reduction in CsA dosage with the addition of azathioprine or a complete switch to azathioprine, mainly because of CsA-associated nephrotoxicity. Of those CsA patients switched at a mean time of 21.3 +/- 16.4 months posttransplant with mean serum creatinine of 2.40 +/- .67, current serum creatinine is 1.79 +/- .63. Current mean serum creatinine values are significantly greater for patients randomized to CsA-pred (1.73 +/- .60) vs. ALG-AZA-pred (1.49 +/- .59), P = .014, even though most CsA-treated patients were eventually switched. The causes of graft loss are not different between CsA and ALG-AZA randomized patients. In nondiabetics, rejection is the most common cause of graft loss (17/33), whereas in diabetics loss due to complications from overimmunosuppression or death from cardiovascular events is significantly more common (27/44) than corresponding losses in nondiabetics (6/33, P less than .05). Switching does not seem to influence the incidence or cause of graft loss. Since most patients started on CsA-prednisone are ultimately switched to triple drug therapy, the latter is now the preferred initial treatment modality.     

Mycobacterial infections in renal allograft recipients

Primary mycobacterial infections developed in five of 565 patients who had transplants during a 15-year period. All had negative PPDs and normal chest roentgenograms; none had tuberculosis before transplantation. Atypical mycobacteria were cultured in three of five infections. All were treated with a multiple-drug regimen, including isoniazid, rifampin, ethambutol, and streptomycin sulfate. In four of five patients, there were serious drug-related complications. No major initial alteration of immunosuppressive therapy was necessary in any of the patients. During the study, a treatment policy was followed that included one year of isoniazid treatment of all recipients with a positive PPD, history of tuberculosis, chest x-ray film suggestive of tuberculosis, or PPD-positive donor. An additional 14 transplant recipients were treated in accordance with this policy without complications or subsequent mycobacterial infections (32-month average follow-up). Despite the low incidence of mycobacterial infection in this series, the potential lethality and morbidity mandate constant vigilance.     

Opportunistic infections in renal allograft recipients

Two major factors for successful organ transplantation are better control of rejection and better prevention and treatment of infections. In renal allograft recipients, immunosuppressive drug therapy is the major cause of immunocompromised status and occurrence of infections, which arise most commonly as a result of invasion by endogenous opportunists. It may also follow colonization by exogenous environmental organisms and via transfer of cytomegalovirus along with the transplanted kidney. The overall incidence of opportunistic infections varies from center to center; up to 15% of renal transplant recipients die of these infections. Clinical signs and symptoms of infection in immunocompromised patients may be concealed or imitated by the underlying disease, and a high index of clinical suspicion is vital. The unusual pathogens encountered in these patients demand thorough investigation. A total of 84 opportunistic infections encountered in renal allograft recipients during histopathologic and cytopathological evaluation of various specimens during the last 15 years is presented in this report. Invasive fungal infections were the most common pathogens, amounting to 55% of all infections. The dramatic increase in the diversity and number of opportunistic infections detected in these patients is not only due to an increasing population of susceptible individuals but also due to an improved recognition by advanced laboratory diagnostic techniques. The success of management of opportunistic infections depends on strong clinical suspicion, early diagnosis, and prompt treatment. The challenges of early diagnosis of opportunistic infections and prompt treatment are great; the rewards are even greater.     

A prospective randomized trial comparing the efficacy of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in black recipients of primary cadaveric renal transplants.

BACKGROUND: We performed a prospective randomized trial to compare the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (FK506) versus cyclosporine (CSA) in black primary cadaveric renal transplant (CRT) recipients. METHODS: Between December 1994 and February 1997, 35 black primary CRT recipients were enrolled in this trial. All patients received 7 days of induction therapy with OKT3. Fourteen patients received FK506 and prednisone only. Twenty-one patients received CSA, azathioprine, and prednisone. The two groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, plasma renin activity, human leukocyte antigen mismatches, and cause of renal failure. RESULTS: Patient and graft survival were 12 of 14 (86%) for the FK506 group and 20 of 21 (95%) for the CSA group (P = 0.71). Three patients died owing to cardiac events with functioning grafts. Acute rejection was 2 of 14 (14%) for the FK506 and 8 of 21 (38%) for the CSA group (P = 0.25). Two other patients on CSA were converted to FK506 as rescue for OKT3-resistant rejection. Mean serum cholesterol at 1 year was 198 +/- 45 mg/dL for the FK506 group and 244 +/- 49 mg/dL for the CSA group (P = 0.03). Mean serum creatinine at 1 year was 1.39 +/- 0.38 mg/dL for the FK506 group and 1.94 +/- 0.64 mg/dL for the CSA group (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Patient and graft survival were similar in both groups at 1 year posttransplant. Although statistically not significant, the incidence of acute rejection was lower in the FK506 group. Furthermore, FK506-treated patients had significantly lower serum creatinine and cholesterol levels at 1 year posttransplant.     

Increased incidence of renal allograft thrombosis under cyclosporine immunosuppression

Six of 325 patients undergoing renal transplantation under combined cyclosporine (CsA)-prednisone immunosuppression displayed renal artery thrombosis between 4 and 12 days after transplantation. All six patients had satisfactory initial revascularization, as ascertained by radionuclide scan and renal function. In none was the thrombosis considered to be secondary to rejection, either by clinical course or upon renal biopsy. Since there was no clear etiologic factor and since none of the overlapping 297 patients treated with azathioprine-prednisone displayed this complication, these cases appear to support the hypothesis that CsA alters intravascular hemostatic homeostasis. Data in experimental models are consistent with a predisposing factor to thrombosis, namely CsA reduces the synthesis of prostacyclin stimulating factors, leading to decreased prostacyclin production by vascular endothelial cells, and to failure to inhibit platelet aggregation.     

A randomized, prospective, pharmacoeconomic trial of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in combination with thymoglobulin in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: To date, the clinical trials of tacrolimus (TAC) versus cyclosporine modified (CsA), have not defined which agent is more cost-effective for immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients especially in a quadruple immunosuppressive regimen. METHODS: The objective of this randomized, prospective study was to compare the clinical and economic outcomes of TAC versus CsA, in a regimen that consisted of Thymoglobulin induction, an antimetabolite, and prednisone. Between December 2000 and October 2002, 200 patients were enrolled and randomized in a 2:1 fashion (TAC n=134, CsA n=66). RESULTS: At 1 year, acute rejection (4% TAC vs. 6% CsA), patient survival (TAC 99% vs. CsA 100%), and graft survival (95% TAC versus 100% CsA, P=0.059) were similar. Serum creatinine levels were lower in the TAC group compared with the CsA group (1.3+/-0.3 vs. 1.6+/-0.7 mg/dL, P=0.03). The incidence of CMV infection was similar between the groups and two patients, both in the TAC arm, developed malignancy. Anti-hypertensive requirement (32% TAC vs. 32% CsA) and the incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus (4% TAC vs. 2% CsA) were similar. Pretransplant, fewer TAC patients received dyslipidemia treatment (40% TAC vs. 67% CsA, P=0.0005), while more CsA patients were able to discontinue these medications posttransplant (absolute change 25% TAC vs. 47% CsA). Total 12-month medication costs were similar (17,723 +/- 11,647 dollars TAC vs. 16,515 +/- 10,189 dollars CsA). CONCLUSIONS: When combined with Thymoglobulin induction, an antimetabolite, and corticosteroids, TAC and CsA are comparable in safety, efficacy, and cost in renal transplantation.