Use of demineralized bone matrix in the extremities

Autologous bone graft is considered as the gold standard for all indications for bone grafting procedures but the limited availability and complications in donor site resulted in seeking other options like allografts and bone graft substitutes. Demineralized bone matrix (DBM) is an allograft product with no quantity limitation. It is an osteoconductive material with osteoinductive capabilities, which vary among different products, depending on donor characteristics and differences in processing of the bone. The purpose of the present review is to provide a critical review of the existing literature concerning the use of DBM products in various procedures in the extremities. Clinical studies describing the use of DBM alone or in combination with other grafting material are available for only a few commercial products. The Level of Evidence of these studies and the resulting Grades of Recommendation are very low. In conclusion, further clinical studies of higher quality are required in order to improve the Recommendation Grades for or against the use of DBM products in bone grafting procedures.     

Demineralized Bone Matrix Carriers and their Clinical Applications: An Overview

Reconstruction of massive bone defects is challenging for orthopaedic clinicians, especially in cases of severe trauma and resection of tumors in various locales. Autologous iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) is the “gold standard” for bone grafting. However, the limited availability and complications at donor sites resulted in seeking other options like allografts and bone graft substitutes. Demineralized bone matrix (DBM) is a form of allograft using acidic solution to remove mineral components, while leaving much of the proteinaceous components native to bone, with small amounts of calcium‐based solids, inorganic phosphates, and some trace cell debris. It is an osteoconductive and osteoinductive biomaterial and is approved as a medical device for use in bone defects and spinal fusion. To pack consistently into the defect sites and stay firmly in the filling parts, DBM products have various forms combined with biocompatible viscous carriers, including sponges, strips, injectable putty, paste, and paste infused with chips. The present review aims to summarize the properties of various kind of viscous carriers and their clinical use combined with DBM in commercially available products. Given DBM'mercially available products. Given DBM;s long clinical track record and commercial accessibility in standard forms, opportunities to further develop and validate DBM as a versatile bone biomaterial in orthopaedic repair and regenerative medicine contexts are attractive.     

Comparative efficacy of 2 different demineralized bone matrix allografts in treating long-bone nonunions in heavy tobacco smokers

Smoking impairs bone healing and increases the risk for complications associated with nonunions. The efficacies of 2 different allografts, Grafton (demineralized bone matrix [DBM] in a gel-like glycerol carrier) and Orthoblast (DBM with a reverse thermal poloxamer carrier) were examined with respect to nonunions in patients who reported heavy tobacco use. The Grafton allograft was used in 25 patients, and the Orthoblast allograft was used in 13 patients. All patients smoked more than half a pack of cigarettes a day and did not use electric stimulators. A successful graft was defined as healing on the first graft attempt without complications or later regraft. The Grafton and Orthoblast success rates were 52% and 85%, respectively (P = .077). The unique thermal properties of the Orthoblast reverse poloxamer, which may enhance DBM osteoinduction, may account for the difference in success rates. Although results failed to reach statistical significance, the large difference and high likelihood ratio (4.2) between the 2 groups suggest that perhaps not all commercially available allografts may necessarily perform with the same efficacy with respect to heavy smokers.     

异体DBM复合rhBMP-2修复兔桡骨缺损的实验研究

目的探讨异体脱钙骨基质（demineralized bonematrix，DBM）复合重组人骨形态发生蛋白2（reconstruction humn bonemorphology protein-2，rhBMP-2）修复节段性骨缺损的能力。方法48只新西兰大白兔采用桡骨15mm节段性骨缺损模型，随机分为3组，A组植入异体DBM与rhBMP-2复合材料，B组植入异体DBM，C组为空白对照组。术后4周、8周、12周、16周．进行放射学和组织学检查。结果A组：术后4周宿主结缔组织长入植骨材料内的骨小梁间，并有岛状新生软骨、骨组织形成；术后8周，新生软骨及骨形成并融合成片；术后12周，新骨改建成熟，但仍能见到植骨材料；术后16周，管状骨结构形成，髓腔再通。B组：术后4周，植骨材料周围有软骨形成；术后8周，大量软骨形成；术后12周，大片状骨形成；术后16周，有髓腔形成。C组：各时问点仅见有纤维结缔组织，只在两端有新骨形成。X片示A组成骨量大，新骨改建、成熟迅速，术后16周全部达骨性愈合。B组成骨量少，仅2例达骨性愈合。C组未见骨性愈合。结论异体DBM复合rhBMP-2材料通过骨诱导和骨传导两种方式修复骨缺损，是一种较理想、具有高效成骨活性的植骨材料。     

The use of fibre-based demineralised bone matrix in major acetabular reconstruction: surgical technique and preliminary results

Acetabular osteolysis associated with socket loosening is one of the main long-term complications of total hip arthroplasty. In case of major bone loss, where <50% host bone coverage can be obtained with a porous-coated cementless cup, it is generally agreed that a metal ring or cage in association with a cemented component and allograft bone should be used. In order to promote allograft bone consolidation and incorporation, we have associated demineralised bone matrix (DBM, Grafton® A Flex) to the construct ion. Here we describe the technical details of major acetabular reconstruction using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device with allograft bone and DBM. This device has a hook that must be placed under the teardrop of the acetabulum and a plate for iliac fixation. The main advantages of this device are help in restoring the normal centre of hip rotation, guiding the reconstruction and partially unloading the graft. The Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device has provided a 92% survival rate free of loosening at 13-year follow-up in a consecutive series of 60 type III and IV deficiencies. Our preliminary results using DBM indicate faster allograft consolidation and remodelling.     

In vitro and in vivo optimization of impaction allografting by demineralization and addition of rh-OP-1.

Impaction allografting is a bone tissue engineering technique currently used in lower limb reconstruction orthopedic surgery. Our hypothesis was that biological optimization can be achieved by demineralization and addition of osteogenic protein-1 (OP-1) to the allograft. The objective of our in vitro study was to evaluate human mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) proliferation (Alamar Blue assay, titrated thymidine assay, total DNA Hoechst 33258, and scanning electron microscopy) and osteogenic differentiation (alkaline phosphatase assay) in two types of impacted carrier, namely, demineralized bone matrix (DBM) and insoluble collagenous bone matrix (ICBM), with or without OP-1. The objective in vivo was to compare the osteogenic potential of impacted DBM with or without OP-1, with that of impacted fresh frozen allograft (FFA), again with or without OP-1. DBM + OP-1 optimized osteoinduction and significantly improved (p < 0.05) proliferation and differentiation in comparison to the majority of all other graft preparation in vitro. In addition, DBM + OP-1 was significantly superior, with regard to osteogenesis, compared to the impacted FFA alone (p < 0.001), FFA + OP-1 (p = 0.01) and DBM alone (p = 0.02) in vivo. We propose that partial demineralization and addition of OP-1 provides a good method for improving the osteoinductive properties of fresh allograft currently used in the impaction grafting technique.     

A novel application of high-dose (50 kGy) gamma irradiation for demineralized bone matrix: effects on fusion rate in a rat spinal fusion model

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The safety of allograft material has come under scrutiny because of recent reports of allograft-associated bacterial and viral infections in tissue recipients. Gamma irradiation, although being one of the most effective ways of terminal sterilization, has been shown to affect the biomechanical properties of allograft bone. It may also have detrimental effects on the osteoinductivity of allograft material such as demineralized bone matrix (DBM) by the denaturation of proteins because of heat generated by irradiation. Sterilization of DBM material is an important variable in processing graft materials. This is considered to be one of the factors leading to different fusion rates observed with different commercially available DBM products, as the sterilization procedure itself may affect the osteoinductivity of the material. Currently, there is no ideal sterilization technique that limits the detrimental effect on osteoinductivity and fusion rates. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of a range of hydrogen peroxide exposures with or without the controlled high-dose gamma irradiation after processing with radioprotectant solutions (Clearant radiation sterilization procedure) on the fusion rates of human DBM. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective in vivo animal study. METHODS: Eighty mature athymic nude female rats were used for this study, which formed 10 equal groups. Human DBM exposed to hydrogen peroxide for different time periods (0, 1, 6, and 24 hours) was divided into two major subgroups. One group was further treated with controlled high-dose radiation using radioprotectants (radiation treated), whereas the other group was frozen immediately without specific treatment (non-radiation treated). Both radiation-treated and non-radiation-treated DBM material from each group of hydrogen peroxide exposure times were implanted between L4 and L5 transverse processes of the rats forming eight test groups including eight animals in each. The remaining 16 rats were divided into two additional groups to form negative (only decortication, n=8) and positive (bone morphogenetic protein [BMP]-2, n=8) control groups. The rats were evaluated for fusion by radiographs (2, 4, and 8 weeks), manual palpation (8 weeks), and histological analysis after sacrificing. Comparison of fusion rate among all groups was made using these three evaluation methods. RESULTS: Increasing the time period of hydrogen peroxide (0, 1, 6, or 24 hours) exposure for preparation of DBM from bone allograft did not affect the fusion rates significantly (p<.05), although there was a trend toward decreasing fusion rates with longer exposure times. When the hydrogen peroxide washed DBM preparations were also radiation treated, the resulting fusion rates were again not significantly different (p<.05). Agreement among fusion detection methods was found to be high. CONCLUSIONS: Hydrogen peroxide processing was not detrimental to fusion rates. The additional terminal sterilization technique with special gamma irradiation protocols (Clearant process) also did not decrease the fusion rates but could provide an additional margin of safety.     

Autograft versus allograft with or without demineralized bone matrix in posterolateral lumbar fusion in rabbits. Laboratory investigation

OBJECT: Posterolateral spinal fusions are performed to treat different spinal disorders. Autograft continues to be the gold standard; it is, however, associated with donor site morbidity and limited sources. Allograft has been used, but has been reported to result in lower fusion rates. Demineralized bone matrix (DBM) has also been used and reportedly increases the fusion rate in a variety of critical defect models. Different forms of DBM are available, not all have been independently studied. To evaluate the effect of a xenogenic DBM added to allograft on the fusion rate of posterolateral lumbar spine arthrodesis the authors designed an experimental study comparing posterolateral fusion rate using autograft, allograft, and allograft plus a xenogenic DBM in a validated animal model. METHODS: A bilateral, 1-level (L4-5) intertransverse process fusion was performed in 45 male New Zealand rabbits. Iliac crest bone graft was harvested bilaterally from each rabbit. The rabbits were randomly assigned to 3 groups: Group I, Autograft, 15 rabbits; Group II, Allograft, 15 rabbits; and Group III, Allograft plus DBM in a paste form (Dynagraft). The animals were killed 8 weeks after surgery. Fusion was assessed radiographically and by manual palpation by 2 independent observers. The results were analyzed using the Fisher exact test and chi-square test. RESULTS: The fusion rate was 46.6% (7 of 15 rabbits) in the autograft group, 33.3% (5 of 15 rabbits) in the allograft group, and 33.3% (5 of 15 rabbits) in the allograft plus DBM group (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Autograft produced a higher fusion rate than allograft in this spinal fusion rabbit model, but the difference was not statistically significant. Allograft plus xenogenic DBM showed the same fusion rate as allograft alone.     

Use of demineralized bone matrix in spinal fusion

Spinal fusion remains the gold-standard treatment for several pathological spine conditions. Although, autologous Iliac Crest Bone Grafting is considered the gold-standard graft choice to promote spinal fusion; however, it is associated with significant donor site morbidity and a limited graft quantity. Therefore, several bone graft alternatives have been developed, to augment arthrodesis. The purpose of this review is to present the results of clinical studies concerning the use of demineralized bone matrix (DBM), alone or as a composite graft, in the spinal fusion. A critical review of the English-language literature was conducted on Pubmed, using key word “demineralized bone matrix”, “DBM”, “spinal fusion”, and “scoliosis”. Results had been restricted to clinical studies. The majority of clinical trials demonstrate satisfactory fusion rates when DBM is employed as a graft extender or a graft enhancer. Limited number of prospective randomized controlled trials (4 studies), have been performed comparing DBM to autologous iliac crest bone graft in spine fusion. The majority of the clinical trials demonstrate comparable efficacy of DBM when it used as a graft extender in combination with autograft, but there is no clinical evidence to support its use as a standalone graft material. Additionally, high level of evidence studies are required, in order to optimize and clarify the indications of its use and the appropriate patient population that will benefit from DBM in spine arthrodesis.     

Bone graft materials. An overview of the basic science

Autograft, allograft, and synthetic bone graft substitute materials play an important role in reconstructive orthopaedic surgery, and understanding the biologic effects of these materials is necessary for optimum use. Although vascularized and cancellous autograft show optimum skeletal incorporation, host morbidity limits autograft availability. Experimental studies have confirmed an immune response to allograft bone, but the clinical significance of this response in humans still is unclear. Small amounts of cancellous allograft in humans usually are remodeled completely; large allografts become incorporated by limited, surface intramembranous bone formation suggesting that these graft are primarily osteoconductive. Several synthetic skeletal substitute materials also are osteoconductive, and may show remodeling characteristics similar to allograft. Demineralized bone matrix and some isolated or synthetic proteins can induce endochondral bone formation, and therefore are osteoinductive. The extent and distribution of remodeling of bone graft materials are influenced by many factors, including the quality of the host site and the local mechanical environment (strain). Graft materials are likely to become more specialized for use in specific clinical applications, and composite preparations may soon provide bone graft materials with efficacy that equals or exceeds that of autogenous grafts.     

Demineralized bone matrix and hydroxyapatite/tri-calcium phosphate mixture for bone healing in rats

Purpose: Hydroxyapatite/tri-calcium phosphate (HA/TCP) mixture is an osteoconductive material used as a bone graft substitute, and demineralised bone matrix (DBM) is an osteoinductive material. A combination of DBM and HA/TCP mixture would probably create a composite with both osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the combination of DBM and HA/TCP mixture on healing of rat radius segmental defects. Methods: Twenty-four adult male Wistar rats were used. Bilateral radial defects were created in each animal. Radial defects were implanted with DBM, HA/TCP mixture and a combination of both substances. Control defects were left unfilled. Ten weeks after implantation, the animals were sacrificed, and the radii were evaluated by radiograhic and histopathological studies. Results: The use of DBM alone demonstrated improved healing on radiographic and histological studies compared to other groups and the control group. There were no differences between the other two groups and the control group. Conclusion: The DBM group showed the best healing response. Combined use of DBM and HA/TCP mixture did not improve bone healing, and the osteoinductive properties of DBM were inhibited by HA/TCP mixture.     

Promotion of incompatible allograft acceptance in rhesus monkeys given posttransplant antithymocyte globulin and donor bone marrow. II. Effects of adjuvant immunosuppressive drugs

Previous studies from this laboratory demonstrated prolonged acceptance of MHC-mismatched kidney allografts in rhesus monkeys treated with posttransplant rabbit antithymocyte globulin (RATG)* and donor-specific bone marrow (DBM). Here we have investigated the effect of adjunctive immunosuppressive drugs on induction of allogeneic unresponsiveness in this primate model. Parameters examined included median kidney allograft survival time (MST), development of specific antidonor T lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity (LMC) and antidonor antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). Posttransplant infusion of DBM in RATG-treated kidney allograft recipients resulted in 70 days MST and a dramatic reduction in the incidence of antidonor LMC. However, development of antidonor ADCC was similar to that of RATG controls, suggesting an immune deviation or split tolerance in these animals. Adjunctive azathioprine did not have a beneficial effect in recipients given RATG & DBM, resulting in decreased MST and increased antidonor LMC responses. In contrast, adjunctive cyclosporine (CsA) and low-dose prednisone (P) exerted an additive immunosuppressive effect resulting in a 50% increase in MST and no detectable antidonor LMC. However, CsA & P appeared to enhance the humoral alloimmune response, increasing the incidence of recipients with antidonor ADCC. Long-term graft survival in this group was limited by chronic rejection and especially by CsA-associated toxicity. These studies point out deterrents and also directions for optimizing adjunctive immunosuppression in primates treated with posttransplant RATG & DBM. The results with CsA are relatively encouraging. However, the prevalence of alloantibody and of chronic rejection in these animals suggests that more homogeneous success with tolerance induction in this model may require adjunctive immunosuppressive strategies that reduce humoral immunity.     

自体外周血干细胞/脱钙骨复合移植治疗兔桡骨缺损的实验研究

目的 观察自体外周血干细胞(Autologous Pexipheral Blood Stem Cell—APBSC)/脱钙骨(Decalcified Bone Matrix-DBM)复合移植治疗骨缺损的疗效。方法 36只家兔桡骨做成1cm骨缺损,随机分为DBM组自体红骨髓(Autologous red bone marrow—ARBM)/DBM组APBSC/DBM组,每组12只。分别进行X线观察、生物力学检查和组织学观察的对比研究。结果 术后第2、4、8、14周APBSE/DBM组X线观察改进的Gary评分和光镜观察均优于DBM组,与ARBM/DBM组相似,术后第14周APBSC/DBM组整骨破坏载荷和骨缺损修复,形态学评分也优于DBM组,与ARBM/DBM组比较,前者没有显著性差异,后者有显著性差异。结论 APBSC/DBM复合移植治疗骨缺损的疗效优于单纯DBM移植,与ARBM/DBM组相似。结合临床我们认为具有良好的应用前景。     

The matrix of endochondral bone differs from the matrix of intramembranous bone

Summary Osseous tissue develops via two distinctly different processes: endochondral (EC) ossification and intramembranous (IM) ossification. The present study tests the hypothesis that each type of osseous tissue contains unique inducing factors for the promotion of cartilage and bone development. Previous work suggests that subcutaneous implants of demineralized EC and IM bone matrices both induce endochondral ossification. Thus, it concludes that the bone growth promotion properties of the respective matrices are very similar. As it was unclear to us why EC and IM bone powders should possess identical osteoinductive properties, we attempted to reproduce these results. We implanted EC (femoral) demineralized bone matrix (DBM), IM (frontal) DBM, or a mixture of the two into the ventral thoracic subcutaneous tissue of 12 to 15-week-old male Sprague Dawley rats. Morphological and radiolabeling techniques in this study demonstrated that implants of EC bone matrix induce bone formation via EC ossification in contrast to implants of IM bone matrix which do not induce EC ossification. Our findings suggest that the matrix of EC bone differs qualitatively from the matrix of IM bone due to their respective abilities to induced cartilage and/or bone formation. These observations differ from those previously reported possibly because our IM DBM preparations were not contaminated with tissues of endochondral origin. In current clinical practice, EC DBM allografts are often used to induce new bone formation in defects involving both IM and EC bone. We conclude that there may be clinical settings in which it would be more appropriate to replace bone originally formed via IM ossification with IM DBM rather than EC DBM.     

CD154 Blockade for Induction of Mixed Chimerism and Prolonged Renal Allograft Survival in Nonhuman Primates

Costimulatory blockade with anti-CD154 monoclonal antibody (aCD154) prolongs allograft survival in nonhuman primates, but has not reliably induced tolerance when used alone. In the current studies, we evaluated the effect of adding CD154 blockade to a chimerism inducing nonmyeloablative regimen in primates. We observed a significant improvement of donor bone marrow (DBM) engraftment, which has been associated with a lower incidence of acute rejection and long-term survival of renal allografts without the need for previously required splenectomy. Among the long-term survivors, four never showed evidence of rejection, with the longest survival exceeding 1700 days following discontinuation of immunosuppression. Nevertheless, late chronic rejection was observed in three of eight recipients, indicating the necessity of further modifications of the regimen. Control recipients receiving no DBM or donor splenocytes in place of DBM rejected their allografts. Thus, DBM engraftment with, at least, transient mixed chimerism appears essential for induction of allograft tolerance using this conditioning regimen. Modification of the original mixed chimerism approach, by the addition of costimulatory blockade, has been shown to enhance mixed chimerism and induce renal allograft tolerance with less morbidity in nonhuman primates.     

Biomechanical analysis of allograft bone treated with a novel tissue sterilization process.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Several methods to sterilize allograft bone exist, including gamma irradiation and freeze-drying, which can alter the mechanical properties of the graft. Efforts are under way to develop a method for processing osseous allograft that maintains structural integrity. Herein is presented one such method. PURPOSE: To analyze the mechanical properties, compared with nontreated controls, of a novel sterilization process for allograft cortical bone. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A controlled biomechanical evaluation of allograft bone under various types of loading after a novel sterilization treatment. PATIENT SAMPLE: Not applicable; basic science. OUTCOME MEASURES: The load to failure was recorded for both the study and control groups, and statistical analysis of these results was performed. Significance level (alpha) and power (beta) were set to 0.05 and 0.90, respectively. Single-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to detect significant differences between the treated and untreated groups. A post-experimental power analysis was performed for each of the response variables. METHODS: Cortical tibia and femur samples from seven cadaveric donors (mean age 68.7 years) were treated with Biocleanse and compared with untreated samples with regard to density and strength. All samples were loaded to failure under diametral and biaxial compression, shear, and three-point bending. RESULTS: Statistical analysis was done on the density and failure stress for all modes of loading. ANOVA did not indicate a significant (p>.05) effect of treatment on the density except for the axial and biaxial specimens (p<.05). ANOVA analysis of failure stress demonstrated no significant differences (p>.05) between cortical bone treated with Biocleanse and untreated specimens under all four types of mechanical loading. Post-experimental power analysis revealed power to be greater than 0.9 for each test. CONCLUSIONS: Sterilization of allograft bone with Biocleanse does not significantly alter the mechanical properties when compared with untreated samples. The effect of this sterilization process on the osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties of allograft bone must be determined.     

脱钙骨基质在四肢植骨中应用的有效性及安全性的系统评价与Meta分析

目的研究脱钙骨基质（DBM）在四肢植骨手术中的疗效,对所有已获得的数据进行系统综述和Meta分析,评价DBM在四肢植骨手术中作为骨移植替代物的有效性及安全性。 方法在PubMed、MEDLINE,EMBASE和Cochrane协作网图书馆中进行文献检索。检索DBM在四肢植骨手术中的应用,根据文献纳入标准进行选择。重点选择数据可以被提取以及能够进行Meta分析的文章。 结果44项研究符合纳入标准,其中随机对照试验3篇,病例系列研究27篇,病例-对照研究14篇。所有的研究报告均未报道DBM作为移植物,融合部位出现破坏或者移位。 结论1项病例系列研究认为,使用Allomatrix DBM作为自体骨移植的替代品,其极高的并发症风险是不可接受的。余下43项研究报告得出的结果均为DBM与自体骨和其他骨移植替代材料相比较具有非劣效性,根据患者的随访报告结果可以认为DBM作为骨移植替代材料的融合率和安全性是有保障的,但是这方面证据的数量和质量是非常有限的。     

Use of biphasic calcium phosphate versus demineralized bone matrix: retrospective clinical and CT analysis of posterolateral fusion results

Purpose

Bone graft extenders have been developed to prevent donor site morbidity associated with iliac crest bone graft, but few studies compared the efficacy of various substitutes. Our purpose was to determine fusion rate and clinical outcome in patients undergoing lumbar arthrodesis using demineralized bone matrix (DBM) and biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP).

Methods

Patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis undergoing one-level or two-level arthrodesis of lumbar spine were retrospectively reviewed. Two treatment groups placed either BCP or DBM, in addition to local autograft in lumbar posterolateral space. Three-dimensional CT exam and dynamic flexion–extension radiographs at postoperative 2-year were assessed for posterolateral fusion status and pain scale and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for clinical outcome.

Results

Of the 148 patients reviewed (including 23 in one- and 58 patients in two-level in BCP group, and 47 in one- and 20 patients in two-level in DBM group), no significant differences were found in terms of age, sex, BMI, smoking, diabetes, steroids, number of level fused, non-union rate or revision surgery between BCP and DBM groups. Significantly improved pain scale of back and leg and ODI were found in both groups postoperatively without group difference. We found a comparable fusion rate in one-level surgery (100% versus 93.6%) and a superior fusion rate of BCP group in two-level surgery (98.3% versus 80.0%, p = 0.01).

Conclusion

Being a bone graft extender without osteoinductive property, with local autograft, BCP is comparable to DBM for one- and superior for two-level fusion. No significant difference was found in clinical outcomes.

     

Donor-specific tolerance permits burn allografting without increased sepsis

Early excision and allografting of massive burns is beneficial. However, chronic immunosuppression, utilized to prolong allograft survival, increases the potential risk of infection. We have previously shown long-term skin allograft survival in mice with a 30% total body surface area (TBSA) burn by inducing donor-specific tolerance (DST) using only perigrafting administration of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and donor bone marrow (DBM). Chronic immunosuppression is avoided. This study tests whether induction of DST compromises host resistance to infection. Resistance to a septic challenge created by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) 10 days after a 30% TBSA burn was investigated in the following groups of mice: [table: see text] Positive blood cultures were documented for 97% of mortalities. Burn excision and grafting significantly (P less than or equal to 0.05) decreased mortality. No increased mortality was seen in allografted mice receiving ATG or ATG and DBM compared to isografted mice receiving no immunosuppression. These studies suggest that skin allografting with DST may permit the benefits of burn excision without the risks of infection seen with chronic immunosuppression.