Induction of ovulation after gnRH antagonists

The gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist binds competitively to the receptors and thereby prevents endogenous GnRH from exerting its stimulatory effect on the pituitary cells. This causes suppression of gonadotrophin secretion which occurs immediately after administration of the antagonist. When using GnRH antagonist in controlled ovarian stimulation, ovulation or maturation of the oocyte can, therefore, be induced by a variety of drugs, e.g. native GnRH, recombinant LH or short-acting GnRH agonists. Short-acting GnRH agonists were recommended for triggering ovulation in cases with a high risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Since it is evident that GnRH is required to initiate the LH surge and the oestradiol rise, a single administration of GnRH antagonist during the late follicular phase delays the LH surge. Studies showed that a single s.c. administration of 3 or 5 mg of Cetrorelix in the late follicular stage was sufficient to prevent the LH surge for 617 days. This phenomenon can be used in high responder patients who are prone to OHSS. The question whether this delay has any effect on oocyte quality and maturation still remains unanswered. Overall, there are four uses for GnRH antagonist: (i) using short-acting GnRH agonists for triggering ovulation in cases in which the GnRH antagonist is part of the protocol for ovarian stimulation. Recombinant LH and native LHRH could also be used as triggers of LH surge; (ii) delaying the LH surge in cases prone to OHSS by treatment with GnRH antagonist; (iii) to administer GnRH antagonist during the luteal phase to decrease the activity of corpora lutea; (iv) in polycystic ovarian disease with elevated LH the LH/FSH ratio can be corrected with the injection of GnRH antagonist prior to and during ovarian stimulation.     

Use of a single bolus of GnRH agonist triptorelin to trigger ovulation after GnRH antagonist ganirelix treatment in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction, with special reference to the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: preliminary report: short communication

A new treatment option for patients undergoing ovarian stimulation is the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol, with the possibility to trigger a mid-cycle LH surge using a single bolus of GnRH agonist, reducing the risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in high responders and the chance of cycle cancellation. This report describes the use of 0.2 mg triptorelin (Decapeptyl) to trigger ovulation in eight patients who underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with recombinant FSH (rFSH, Puregon) and concomitant treatment with the GnRH antagonist ganirelix (Orgalutran) for the prevention of premature LH surges. All patients were considered to have an increased risk for developing OHSS (at least 20 follicles > or =11 mm and/or serum oestradiol at least 3000 pg/ml). On the day of triggering the LH surge, the mean number of follicles > or =11 mm was 25.1 +/- 4.5 and the median serum oestradiol concentration was 3675 (range 2980-7670) pg/ml. After GnRH agonist injection, endogenous serum LH and FSH surges were observed with median peak values of 219 and 19 IU/l respectively, measured 4 h after injection. The mean number of oocytes obtained was 23.4 +/- 15.4, of which 83% were mature (metaphase II). None of the patients developed any signs or symptoms of OHSS. So far, four clinical pregnancies have been achieved from the embryos obtained during these cycles, including the first birth following this approach. It is concluded that GnRH agonist effectively triggers an endogenous LH surge for final oocyte maturation after ganirelix treatment in stimulated cycles. Our preliminary results suggest that this regimen may prove effective in triggering ovulation and could be said to prevent OHSS in high responders. The efficacy and safety of such new treatment regimen needs to be established in comparative randomized studies.     

Can we eliminate severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome?

The desire of some couples for children is so strong that they are willing to accept a modicum of risk to treat their infertility. Ideally, assisted reproduction technology practitioners seek a balance between optimum ovarian stimulation and successful treatment outcome with minimal rate of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) or multiple pregnancies. However, despite many years of clinical experience, there are no precise methods to completely prevent severe OHSS, except by withholding the ovulation-inducing trigger of hCG. Individualization of treatment according to the specific risk factor and the specific response in the current cycle with the option of freezing of all embryos, or replacement of only a single embryo, has the potential of reducing the risk and the severity of the syndrome in susceptible cases. We offer a triage aimed at eliminating the occurrence of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome on the basis of several clinical observations, including the role of GnRH antagonist in controlled ovarian stimulation protocols, the option of freezing of all embryos, or replacement of only a single embryo in the blastocyst stage.     

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: classifications and critical analysis of preventive measures

The aim of this review was to summarize previously published classifications for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), as well as to analyse the available methods for preventing OHSS. Withholding hCG and cycle cancellation--once the main methods of preventing OHSS--are now seldom used. There is a growing body of evidence to support the use of coasting to prevent OHSS, without cycle cancellation. However, most studies on coasting are retrospective, and well-designed prospective randomized studies are lacking. There is no current consensus as to how coasting should be carried out. A serum estradiol level of 3000 pg/ml is generally considered optimum for administration of hCG. It appears that intravenous albumin or hydroxyethyl starch at the time of oocyte retrieval is beneficial in preventing OHSS, but does not offer complete protection. There is insufficient evidence to support routine cryopreservation of all embryos for the later transfer of frozen-thawed embryos in high-risk patients. Several uncontrolled studies have reported the protective effect of GnRH agonist to trigger ovulation in preventing OHSS, though the method is applicable solely for gonadotrophin-only or GnRH antagonist cycles. A single dose of recombinant LH to trigger ovulation significantly reduced OHSS as compared with hCG. The possible role of GnRH antagonist protocols in reducing the incidence of OHSS is debatable. The above measures to prevent OHSS were successful in reducing the incidence of the syndrome, but complete prevention is not as yet possible.     

Comparison of GnRH agonists and antagonists in assisted reproduction cycles of patients at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

BACKGROUND: During IVF or ICSI cycles, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a major problem. The aim of this prospective, multicentre, comparative study (using historical controls) was to assess the efficacy of a GnRH antagonist protocol in preventing OHSS in selected patients who had experienced OHSS or had been at risk of OHSS in their previous IVF/ICSI attempt. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients underwent a new cycle where the same gonadotrophin protocol was used [same dose of recombinant FSH (rFSH)] but a different protocol was used for pituitary desensitization: cetrorelix 0.25 mg multiple-dose antagonist instead of GnRH agonist long protocol. Cetrorelix 0.25 mg was administered daily, starting when the leading follicle reached a diameter of 14 mm. In other words, rFSH was administered in the new cycle according to the dosage and the step-up or step-down modalities used during the previous cycle, independently of ultrasound findings and serum estradiol (E(2)) levels. Eighty-seven patients entered the study. Out of the 87 cycles involving GnRH agonists, 49 (56.3%) were cancelled and out of the 87 involving GnRH antagonists 28 (32.2%) were cancelled [McNemar's test; 95% confidence interval (CI) -35.8% to -11.2%; P < 0.001]. After GnRH agonist cycles, we recorded 24 cases of OHSS (18 moderate and six severe; 27.6%), whereas after the GnRH antagonist cycles there were 10 cases of OHSS (nine moderate and one severe; 11.5%) (95% CI-26.4% to -5.7%; P = 0.006). There was a statistically significant reduction in the total number of follicles with a diameter >10 mm (Wilcoxon's test; Z = 6.1; P < 0.001) and of E(2) levels on the day of HCG administration (2538 versus 4322.4 pg/ml; P < 0.001) in the GnRH antagonist cycles versus GnRH agonist cycles. Twenty-nine patients had an embryo transfer in the first cycle (76.3% of oocyte retrievals) and 57 in the cycle using GnRH antagonist (96.6%). This 20.3% difference was also significant (Z-test; 95% CI 6.8-36.0%; P = 0.003). After the antagonist cycles, 18 pregnancies (20.7 per initiated cycle; 31.6% per embryo transfer) were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study presents some limitations owing to the use of historical controls, our data show a favourable effect of GnRH antagonists in reducing the incidence of OHSS and the number of assisted fertilization cycles cancelled because of the risk of OHSS in high responder patients. As a consequence, GnRH antagonist plus gonadotrophin administration could also increase the percentage of oocyte retrievals and embryo transfers in this high risk group of patients.     

Continuation of GnRH agonist administration for 1 week,after hCG injection,prevents ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome following elective cryopreservation of all pronucleate embryos

BACKGROUND: An approach consisting of elective cryopreservation of all embryos has been proposed for patients at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Although elective cryopreservation can prevent pregnancy-induced late OHSS, it cannot prevent early OHSS. Early OHSS is reported to have been complicated with thromboembolism. The study was carried out to assess the efficacy with which the continued administration of GnRH agonist for 1 week after 5000 IU of hCG injection could prevent early OHSS. METHODS: This study employed an open controlled clinical trial at three centres for treatment of infertility in Sapporo. A total of 138 patients at risk of OHSS during IVF-embryo transfer from January 1, 1998 to December 31, 1999, were assigned in turn either to a group with elective cryopreservation of all pronucleate embryos (n = 68) or to one with continuation of GnRH agonist administration for 1 week after hCG injection following elective cryopreservation (n = 70). Subsequently, they were transferred in hormone replacement cycles. The development of severe OHSS (ascites, haemoconcentration) was compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 10% of patients developed severe OHSS necessitating hospitalization because of a marked increase in ascites in the upper abdomen and the haemoconcentration in the elective cryopreservation alone group. On the other hand, none developed severe OHSS in the GnRH agonist continuation group. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, continuation of GnRH agonist for 1 week after hCG injection prevented severe early OHSS following elective cryopreservation of all embryos. This treatment is safe and cost-beneficial, and should be performed promptly for patients at risk of OHSS.     

Embryo implantation and GnRH antagonists: GnRH antagonists do not activate the GnRH receptor

Recent suggestions that gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists activate the GnRH receptor are discussed. Most of the studies cited in support of this suggestion are in-vitro studies, testing supra-pharmacological doses of GnRH analogues in cancer cell lines, whereas GnRH antagonists, e.g. ganirelix or cetrorelix, do not affect the steroidogenesis of human granulosa cells in vitro. In patients treated with GnRH antagonists prior to IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), oocyte maturity and fertilization rates are equal to those achieved following a long protocol of GnRH agonists. Although there is a tendency towards a lower pregnancy rate (not statistically significant) in the initial trials using GnRH antagonist with either recombinant FSH or human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) for ovarian stimulation, this new treatment option of GnRH antagonists facilitates short and simple treatment and improves the convenience and safety for the patient. As with GnRH agonists in the past, the clinical outcome of GnRH antagonist treatment will improve with time as more clinical experience is gained (learning curve) and the treatment protocol is optimized. Moreover, a GnRH agonist instead of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) may be used for triggering ovulation and will decrease the cancellation rate and minimize the risk for developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).     

Ganirelix acetate causes a rapid reduction in estradiol levels without adversely affecting oocyte maturation in women pretreated with leuprolide acetate who are at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

BACKGROUND: Elevated estradiol (E(2)) levels predispose to development of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Since GnRH antagonist is associated with a reduction in E(2) levels, we hypothesized that GnRH-antagonist treatment of women down-regulated with GnRH agonist who are at risk of OHSS might reduce E(2) levels and avoid cycle cancellation. METHODS: Retrospective study in a university-based assisted reproduction technology (ART) programme in 87 patients treated with long luteal (LL) or microdose flare (MDF) with ovarian hyperresponse and 87 control patients without ovarian hyperresponse. GnRH-antagonist (ganirelix acetate) treatment was started and leuprolide acetate discontinued in women who failed to respond to a reduction in gonadotrophin dosage. RESULTS: In the treatment group, there was a significant, reproducible reduction in serum E(2) levels. Mean E(2) at the start of ganirelix treatment was 4219.8 pg/ml and decreased in 24 h to 2613.7 pg/ml (36.7%; P < 0.001). An average of 24.9 +/- 8.8 oocytes were obtained at retrieval and an average of 19.1 +/- 8.0 were metaphase II (79.2%). Fertilization occurred in 13.9 +/- 8.1 embryos (72.8%). In this high risk group, two cases of severe OHSS (2.3%) occurred. The ongoing pregnancy rate was 51.8%. Compared with the control group, there were no statistically significant differences in the rate of oocyte recovery, oocyte maturity, 2PN rate, fertilization, cancellation, OHSS or pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: GnRH-antagonist treatment of women pretreated with GnRH agonist rapidly reduced circulating serum E(2) without adversely affecting oocyte maturation, fertilization rates or embryo quality and resulted in a high pregnancy rate in this subgroup of patients at risk of OHSS.     

Plasma concentrations of nitrate during the menstrual cycle, ovarian stimulation and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Nitric oxide (NO) is predominantly a locally acting mediator, affecting several functions in the human female reproductive tract. In vivo, it is quickly metabolized to its stable end product nitrate, which is cleared by the kidney. METHODS AND RESULTS: The aim of the present study was to evaluate possible fluctuations of plasma nitrate concentrations during the menstrual cycle, ovarian stimulation as well as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). During the menstrual cycle (n = 19 women) the mean nitrate concentrations were between 26.7 and 29.5 micromol/l at all stages except for the day of ovulation, when the concentrations were significantly (P < 0.001) increased (mean 37.2 micromol/l +/- 2.0). Significantly lower concentrations of plasma nitrate (P < 0.01) were measured at the end of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) down-regulation (24.6 micromol/l +/- 1.4) compared with the concentrations found at day 8 of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) stimulation (34.9 micromol/l +/- 2.6) and at the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) (35.6 micromol/l +/- 3.3). The concentrations of nitrate (33.4 micromol/l +/- 3.4) in women with OHSS (n = 13) were similar to those seen 5 days after embryo transfer (33.2 micromol/l +/- 2.3). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that NO synthesis is increased at the time of spontaneous ovulation. GnRH treatment inhibits NO synthesis, while NO production is not increased in women with OHSS.     

The use of GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation

GnRH antagonists induce a rapid decrease in LH and FSH, preventing and interrupting LH surges. Their properties do not require a desensitization period, and this allows their use in the late follicular phase. GnRH antagonists could replace GnRH agonists in controlled ovarian stimulation without their side-effects and their long desensitization period. Two protocols for assisted reproduction technology (ART) cycles were designed: the single-dose protocol allies simplicity and efficacy, while the multiple-dose protocol is efficient and could reduce monitoring of the cycle, though compliance is mandatory. A review of the available literature on GnRH antagonists in ART cycles is presented, focusing on phase III controlled trials and ART results. Both protocols using GnRH antagonists were associated with the need for a smaller dose of gonadotrophin, a shorter stimulation period and a lower incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), albeit with statistically comparable pregnancy rates. A trend is observed in all studies showing a lower pregnancy rates in GnRH antagonist cycles as compared with GnRH agonist cycles. The role of the lower number of embryos, and the potential adverse effects of GnRH antagonists on endometrium or follicle must be studied. More cycles using GnRH antagonists are necessary to confirm their equivalent pregnancy rates. There is room for improvement in both protocols with regard to scheduling, antagonist dose level and the timing of its administration. Until further studies have been conducted, luteal support seems to remain mandatory. Perinatal outcome appears similar to that with other stimulation regimens. Triggering of ovulation can be obtained with GnRH agonist for patients at risk of OHSS. With regard to GnRH antagonists, questions remain regarding pregnancy rates, the indications of their use in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome or poor responders, and in ovarian stimulation outside IVF.     

Serum inhibin A, VEGF and TNFalpha levels after triggering oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist compared with HCG in women with polycystic ovaries undergoing IVF treatment: a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND: We aimed to examine the serum levels of inhibin A, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha), estradiol (E2) and progesterone levels after triggering of final oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist compared with HCG in patients with polycystic ovaries (PCO) and to investigate the relationship between these markers and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with PCO, undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with FSH and GnRH antagonist for IVF-embryo transfer treatment, were randomized for triggering of final oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist (GnRH agonist group, n = 15) or HCG (HCG group, n = 13). Blood samples were obtained on the day of randomization and thereafter every 2-7 days. Serum levels of inhibin A, VEGF, TNFalpha, E2 and progesterone, the incidence of OHSS, ovarian size and pelvic fluid accumulation were evaluated. RESULTS: Serum inhibin A, E2 and progesterone levels were significantly lower in the GnRH agonist group compared with the HCG group, particularly on the day of embryo transfer (P < 0.0001). Serum VEGF and TNFalpha levels were similar between the two groups. Four patients in the HCG group developed severe OHSS, whereas no patient had any symptoms or signs of OHSS in the GnRH-agonist group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PCO treated with FSH/GnRH antagonist, final oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist instead of HCG reduces significantly inhibin A, E2 and progesterone levels during the luteal phase. This phenomenon reflects the inhibition of the corpus luteum function and may explain, at least in part, the mechanism of OHSS prevention in high-risk patients. Our results do not support a crucial role for VEGF or TNFalpha in OHSS.     

Subclavian vein thrombosis following IVF and ovarian hyperstimulation: a case report

Thromboembolic phenomena are a serious consequence of assisted reproductive technology. We present a case of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) at 7 weeks gestation following ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and IVF. Three weeks after recovering from OHSS, the patient presented with left neck pain and swelling. Ultrasound revealed a thrombus in the left jugular vein and left subclavian vein. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) was initiated with symptom resolution within 1 week. The patient remained on LWMH throughout her pregnancy and delivered at term. A literature review showed 97 published cases of thromboembolism following ovulation induction. A majority of these cases was associated with OHSS and pregnancy and the site of involvement was predominantly in the upper extremity and neck. Infertility physicians and obstetricians should be aware of this complication and keep in mind that it may occur weeks after resolution of OHSS symptoms.     

Is GnRH self-priming an obligatory feature of the reproductive cycle?

Insufficient suppression of LH (premature elevation) and FSH (prolonged release) give rise to blood concentrations which may cause damaging effects on oocyte viability and too many follicles respectively. During the surge, LH rises from low to high threshold values to initiate processes from initiation of the resumption of oocyte meiosis to the induction of ovulation. In general, it is thought that a dramatic increase in LH concentration is required to attain the high threshold for ovulation. A self-priming mechanism, by which gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) enhances the LH (and FSH) responses to its own action, was thought to be responsible. However, normal LH surges in rats consist of <2-7% of the maximal pituitary releasing capacity. The physiological roles of LH and FSH favour a control mechanism that restrains their blood concentrations during most of the cycle. Ovarian proteins, e.g. inhibin and putative gonadotrophin-surge-inhibiting factor/attenuating factor (GnSIF/AF), are involved in this process. We argue that the increased pituitary LH responsiveness during the mid-cycle surge is not the result of a self-priming process that 'dramatically' increases the LH releasing capacity of the pituitary gland. This is probably due to elimination by GnRH of the inhibitory action of the putative ovarian proteins GnSIF/AF.     

Modern management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

The number of women receiving ovulation induction has markedly increased with the advent of medically assisted reproduction. Consequently, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) has become a frequent clinical problem. It is a potentially life-threatening situation. In its severe forms it is complicated by haemoconcentration, hypovolaemia, hypotension, acute renal insufficiency and thromboembolism. The pathophysiology of OHSS is poorly understood. The occurrence of OHSS correlates well with the level of oestradiol, the number of follicles, and administration of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG). The risk is increased in polycystic ovarian disease. The aim of this paper is to review critically the published literature on prediction, prevention and modern management of OHSS. Complete prevention of OHSS is not possible although several methods are used to predict and reduce its occurrence. Endocrine profile and ultrasonic follicular monitoring are the mainstays of prediction. The presence of a large number of small and intermediate size follicles at sonography is a risk factor. Withholding HCG, continuation of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues and cryopreservation of embryos are optional courses of action for prevention. Mild OHSS is usually self-limiting and requires no active therapy. Moderate and severe cases are treated by correction of fluid and electrolyte imbalance, and by prevention of thromboembolism. The use of surgery is limited to cases of torsion or rupture of ovarian cysts, or the presence of concomitant ectopic pregnancy. Aspiration of the ascitic fluid, preferably by the transvaginal route, is recommended in cases with severe ascites.     

LH serum levels during ovarian stimulation as predictors of ovarian response and assisted reproduction outcome in down-regulated women stimulated with recombinant FSH

BACKGROUND: There has been much debate about the effect of 'residual' LH levels in normogonadotrophic women undergoing assisted reproduction with GnRH agonist down-regulation and recombinant FSH ovarian stimulation. The aim of this prospective study, where receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used, was to assess further the usefulness of serum LH levels as predictors of ovarian response, assisted reproduction treatment outcome, and the outcome of pregnancy when measured throughout the ovarian stimulation period in a large cohort of such assisted reproduction treatment women. METHODS: A total of 246 consecutive women undergoing their first cycle of IVF or ICSI treatment were included in this study. Blood samples for hormone analyses were obtained on day S0 (the day when pituitary suppression was evidenced) and every other day from stimulation day 5 (S5) until the day of hCG injection. RESULTS: LH serum levels throughout ovarian stimulation treatment were similar for cancelled (n =32) versus non-cancelled (n = 214) cycles, non-conception (n = 132) versus conception (n = 82) cycles, and ongoing pregnancy (n = 66) versus early pregnancy loss (n = 16) groups. There was no correlation between LH serum levels in non-cancelled cycles and parameters of ovarian response and assisted reproduction treatment outcome. ROC analysis showed that serum LH concentration during ovarian stimulation was unable to discriminate between cancelled and non-cancelled cycles, conception versus non-conception cycles, or early pregnancy loss versus ongoing pregnancy groups. CONCLUSIONS: Serum LH measurements during ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH under pituitary suppression in normogonadotrophic women undergoing assisted reproduction treatment cannot predict ovarian response, IVF/ICSI outcome, implantation, and the outcome of pregnancy. Thus, there is little underlying physiological support for the addition of LH in stimulation protocols if daily doses of an appropriate GnRH agonist (leuprolide or triptorelin having lower potency than buserelin) and a step-down regimen of recombinant FSH administration are used.     

Elective cryopreservation of all pronuclear oocytes after GnRH agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation in patients at risk of developing OHSS: a prospective, observational proof-of-concept study

BACKGROUND: A bolus dose of GnRH agonist can substitute for hCG as a trigger for the resumption of meiosis in ovarian stimulation with GnRH antagonists, which has been suggested to reduce the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). As the efficacy of this measure in fresh embryo transfer (ET) cycles is unclear, we evaluated a new clinical concept of GnRH-agonist triggering. METHODS: In this prospective, observational proof-of-concept study, 20 patients considered at increased risk of developing OHSS (> or = 20 follicles > or = 10 mm or estradiol > or = 4000 pg/ml, or a history of cycle cancellation due to OHSS risk or the development of severe OHSS in a previous cycle) after ovarian stimulation and concomitant GnRH-antagonist administration had final oocyte maturation triggered with 0.2 mg triptorelin s.c. All two pronucleate (2 PN) oocytes were cryopreserved by vitrification, and frozen-thawed ETs (FT-ETs) were performed in an artificial cycle. Main outcome measures were the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per patient and the ongoing pregnancy rate per first ET. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of moderate-to-severe OHSS. RESULTS: Of the 20 patients triggered with GnRH agonist, 19 patients underwent 24 FT-ETs in the observational period. The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate was 36.8% (95% confidence interval: 19.1-59.0%). The ongoing pregnancy rate per first FT-ET was 31.6% (15.4-54.0%). No cases of moderate or severe OHSS were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The present study is the proof of the concept that GnRH-agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation in combination with elective cryopreservation of 2 PN oocytes offers OHSS risk patients a good chance of pregnancy achievement, while reducing the risk of moderate and severe OHSS.     

Triggering of ovulation in human menopausal gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles: comparison between intravenously administered gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (100 and 500 {micro}g), GnRH agonist (buserelin, 500 {micro}g) and human chorionic gonadotrophin (10 000 IU)

We studied the peri-ovulatory and luteal phases in 38 humanmenopausal gonadotrophin (HMG)-stimulated cycles, in which ovulationwas triggered with four different i.v. bolus ovulation triggers:100 µg gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH; group A,n = 9), 500 µg GnRH agonist (GnRHa; group B, n = 10),10 000IU human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG; group C, n = 10)and 500 µg GnRH (group D, n = 9). Endogenous luteinizinghormone (LH) surges occurred in all cycles of groups A, B andD. The rise was slowest but highest in group B (P < 0.0001)and lowest in group A. Although the t₀ serum oestradiol valueswere similar in all groups, day +8 oestradiol and day +4 and+8 progesterone concentrations were higher in group C (P <0.05). At day +4 and +8, serum LH concentrations were lowest(P < 0.01) but follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrationswere higher. Clinically, day +8 luteal scores showed a moreconspicuous degree of ovarian hyperstimulation in the HCG group(P = 0.0292). Luteal insufficiency, defined as cycles with progesteroneconcentrations of <8 ng/ml, occurred much more frequentlyin groups A, B and D than in group C (day +4: P < 0.0003;day +8: P < 0.0001), despite progesterone supplementation.Three pregnancies (one in group C and two in group D) and onemoderate case of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (ina non-conceptional group D cycle) occurred. These findings showthat (i) ovulation occurs and pregnancy can be achieved followingan endogenous LH surge induced by GnRH and its agonists, (ii)a high frequency of luteal insufficiency occurs in such cycleseven with luteal supplementation and (iii) OHSS cannot be totallyprevented by this approach, although cycles with an endogenousLH surge in general result in fewer subclinical signs of ovarianhyperstimulation.     

'GnRH agonist trigger: looking for the coin under the lamp post?'

Sir, The main advantage of GnRH agonist trigger is its ability tototally prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Ethicalconsiderations cast a serious doubt on     

Is continuation of a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) necessary for women at risk of developing the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome?

A total of 28 women scheduled for in-vitro fertilization used buserelin and human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) for ovarian stimulation. One group (I) of 17 women was given human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG 10,000 IU) to trigger ovulation, but the resulting embryos were electively cryopreserved because of the risk (serum oestradiol greater than or equal to 3500 pg/ml) of developing the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Six women continued the buserelin therapy in the luteal phase and eleven did not. In group II (n = 11), the HMG injections were discontinued because of an exaggerated ovarian response and the HCG was omitted. Six of these women continued the buserelin injections until the onset of menses and five did not. In both groups, the ovarian response to induction of ovulation (serum oestradiol concentrations and number of follicles) was similar for those who did or did not continue buserelin therapy. There was no difference in the rate of ovarian quiescence (weekly fall in serum oestradiol concentration following the stimulation) between those women who did or did not continue the buserelin therapy in either group. The serum luteinizing hormone concentrations remained low in all women in both groups. We conclude that the omission of buserelin therapy after discontinuing the HMG in women at risk of developing OHSS does not affect subsequent ovarian quiescence.     

'Early coasting' in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome is consistent with good clinical outcome

BACKGROUND: Coasting can be an effective strategy for the prevention of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) during ovarian stimulation. However, OHSS may still occur in cases of excessive follicular response (i.e. >10 follicles/ovary and serum estradiol (E(2)) concentration >3000 pg/ml). Furthermore, prolonged coasting may result in a reduction of the oocyte retrieval rate and embryo quality. This pilot study investigates the potential of withholding gonadotrophins at an earlier stage, with the intention of minimizing these risks. METHODS: Gonadotrophin injections were withheld for a fixed period of 3 days once the leading follicle was 15 mm, whilst continuing pituitary down-regulation in 102 obese patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) in whom there was evidence of excessive ovarian follicular response (>10 follicles per ovary and serum E(2) >1500 but <3000 pg/ml). The events of ovarian stimulation, embryological and clinical outcomes were studied prospectively. RESULTS: The mean number of ampoules (75 IU per ampoule) of high purity (hp) FSH was 23.2. The mean serum E(2) level on coasting day 1 was 1943.7 and 2169.2 pg/ml on the day of HCG administration. Normal fertilization and cleavage rates were obtained despite early withdrawal of hpFSH in the obese PCOS patients, being 73.9 and 87.7% respectively. The clinical pregnancy rate was 45.1%. There were no cases of severe OHSS. Four patients suffered pregnancy-associated late-onset moderate OHSS. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that withholding gonadotrophins at an earlier stage in patients with excessive ovarian follicular response at anticipated risk of developing severe OHSS in the course of ovarian stimulation is consistent with good embryological and clinical outcome in IVF and ICSI treatment cycles.