Hemarthrosis of the knees following streptokinase therapy for acute myocardial infarction

A sixty-four-year-old male patient was studied who had acute coronary syndrome with ST segment elevation experienced bilateral hemarthrosis of the knees after administration of streptokinase and acetylsalicylic acid.     

Long-term follow-up after intracoronary streptokinase therapy for acute myocardial infarction

This article describes the effects on patients treated with intracoronary streptokinase during acute myocardial infarction and long-term follow-up. The mortality and the incidence of cardiac events were assessed during a follow-up period of 35 +/- 5 months. Coronary artery bypass grafting was undertaken in 37% of the patients. Hospital mortality was 11%, (n = 8); none of these deaths was due to myocardial rupture. The postdischarge mortality was 10%; three of these patients experienced sudden death. Serial assessment of left ventricular function in 35 patients showed an increase of angiographic ejection fraction prior to intervention from 50 +/- 4% to 58 +/- 12% (p = 0.005) 36 +/- 53 days later. Gated-blood pool imaging after 16 +/- 7 months (n = 35) and 32 +/- 9 months (n = 31) revealed no change in ejection fraction. Angina pectoris recurred in four of the 35 patients. We studied a historical comparison group, that consisted of 66 patients, who were treated at the same institution prior to the advent of intracoronary intervention techniques; this group was followed for 48 +/- 9 months. Baseline clinical and angiographic parameters were comparable in the two groups. Coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in only 18 of these patients. Mortality during hospitalization and postdischarge was not significantly different in the two groups. Ejection fraction decreased significantly in the comparison group from the first to the second evaluation and remained unchanged during the follow-up period. We conclude that no major adverse effects were associated with intracoronary streptokinase infusion over a long follow-up period. This may be related to the high frequency of coronary artery bypass surgery following reperfusion.     

Intracoronary streptokinase therapy in the coronary care unit for acute myocardial infarction

Intracoronary streptokinase was offered and preliminary coronary angiography performed in 14 patients who were seen with the clinical diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction within 4 h of onset of symptoms. The procedure was performed in the Coronary Care Unit (CCU) of St. Peter's Medical Center with the use of a portable C-arm fluoroscope. Angiography was recorded on video tape. Service was provided by an "on-call" team consisting of two physicians, a CCU nurse, and a radiology technician, on a 24-h service basis. Adequate visualization of coronary anatomy was obtained in all patients. Patency of occluded vessels was achieved in 10 of 11 patients who received intracoronary streptokinase. The initial streptokinase bolus was administered at a mean interval of 4.1 h from onset of symptoms. It is concluded that speedy and effective coronary thrombolytic therapy can be provided in the CCU on a 24-h service basis by an on-call team. The use of CCU for this purpose will make this therapy widely available across the country, without the need for Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory.     

Serum sickness complicating intravenous streptokinase therapy in acute myocardial infarction

A case of delayed serum sickness with transient renal impairmentis described in a patient who received early high dose intravenousstreptokinase following acute myocardial infarction. Reviewof the literature suggests that serum sickness after streptokinasemay occur independently of the dose or route of administration,and could potentially complicate intracoronary streptokinasetherapy.     

Hypersensitivity vasculitis complicating intravenous streptokinase therapy in acute myocardial infarction

A 52-year-old man developed a hypersensitivity vasculitic rash on his legs nine days after receiving intravenous streptokinase therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The histological and immunological features and the differential diagnosis of this unusual complication of streptokinase therapy are reviewed.     

Intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction

Intravenous (IV) fibrinolytic therapy, a recent area of research, has a great deal of applicability in emergency medicine. We report our experience with 30 patients treated with this method. Thirty consecutive patients in the early stages of acute evolving myocardial infarction (AMI) were assigned to receive high-dose IV streptokinase, 1.5 million units over a 30-minute period. Patients presented to the treating hospital at a mean time of 1.21 +/- 1.08 hours, and treatment commenced at a mean time of 2.77 +/- 1.31 hours after the onset of symptoms. Using standard clinical criteria, 86.7% (n = 26) of the patients reperfused initially. Two, however, reoccluded within the first 48 hours, and their clinical symptoms of myocardial infarction reappeared. By clinical observation 80% (n = 24) of the patients reperfused, and myocardial salvage was observed. Twenty-four patients with clinical reperfusion and one additional patient had patency of the affected artery, yielding a reperfusion rate of 83.3% (n = 25) as judged by angiography within one week of AMI. Both patients who had reoccluded clinically also were found to be occluded on angiography. Clinical and angiographic methods yield very similar results for the judgment of reperfusion (80% vs 83%, respectively, with no significant difference, P not significant). The results of our study tend to confirm the efficacy of IV streptokinase as a valuable management tool for early myocardial infarction.     

Intravenous versus intracoronary streptokinase therapy for acute myocardial infarction in community hospitals

A consecutive series of 184 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) received thrombolytic therapy. The first 63 were treated in the catheterization laboratory with intracoronary streptokinase (IC-STK), and 44 (70%) had successful thrombolysis. One hundred twenty-one patients received intravenous (IV) STK immediately after diagnosis of AMI, and 99 (82%) were found to have an open infarct artery. Only 58% of patients (14 of 24) who required transfer from out-of-town hospitals for IC-STK treatment had successful thrombolysis; in contrast, IV-STK given in the local hospital resulted in an 85% (72 of 85) rate of thrombolysis (p = 0.005). IV-STK thus appears at least as effective as IC-STK for AMI and is more effective for patients treated in hospitals without catheterization facilities.     

A randomized controlled trial of intravenous streptokinase in evolving acute myocardial infarction

To determine the efficacy of intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction, 52 patients were randomized to intravenous streptokinase or control groups. Time from onset of infarction to randomization was similar in the streptokinase group and control group, 4.9 +/- 2.1 hours vs 5.4 +/- 2.4 hours, respectively. The 28 streptokinase patients received an intravenous infusion of 700,000 units of streptokinase followed by full-dose anticoagulation. The 24 control patients received normal saline solution followed by full-dose anticoagulation. Of 28 streptokinase patients, 12 (43%) had noninvasive evidence of reperfusion by early peaking of serum creatine kinase (peak creatine kinase less than 16 hours after onset of infarction) vs 3 of 24 control patients (13%), p less than 0.02. Two streptokinase patients (7%) had reperfusion arrhythmias during streptokinase infusion. One streptokinase patient (4%) and two control patients (8%) died during hospitalization. At angiography (16 +/- 5 days after infarction) 22 of 26 streptokinase patients (85%) had a patent infarct-related coronary artery compared to 8 of 20 control patients (40%), p less than 0.01. Comparison of radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction assessed acutely (28 +/- 10 hours after infarction) with left ventricular ejection fraction at hospital discharge (15 +/- 3 days after infarction) showed no significant improvement in either the streptokinase or control group, 0% and +1%, respectively. At follow-up 13 +/- 7 months after infarction, total mortality rate was similar in the streptokinase group and control group, 17.8% (5 of 28 streptokinase patients) and 20.8% (5 of 24 control patients), respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Prospective randomized trial of intravenous and intracoronary streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction

To evaluate the relative thrombolytic efficacy and complications of intracoronary vs high-dose, short-term intravenous streptokinase infusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction, we performed baseline coronary arteriography and then randomly allocated 51 patients with acute myocardial infarction to receive either intracoronary (n = 25) or intravenous (n = 26) streptokinase. Patients getting the drug by the intracoronary route received 240,000 IU of streptokinase into the infarct-related artery over 1 hr, whereas those getting the drug by the intravenous route received either 500,000 IU of streptokinase over 15 min (n = 10) or 1 million IU of streptokinase over 45 min (n = 16). Angiographically observed thrombolysis occurred in 76% (19/25) of the patients receiving intracoronary streptokinase, in 10% (1/10) of the patients receiving 500,000 IU of streptokinase intravenously, and in 44% (7/16) of the patients receiving 1 million IU of streptokinase intravenously. Among patients in whom thrombolysis was observed, mean elapsed time from onset of streptokinase infusion until lysis was 31 +/- 18 min in patients receiving intracoronary streptokinase and 38 +/- 20 min in those receiving intravenous streptokinase (p = NS). Among patients in whom intravenous streptokinase "failed," intracoronary streptokinase in combination with intracoronary guidewire manipulation recanalized only 7% (1/15). Fibrinogen levels within 6 hr after streptokinase were significantly lower in the patients receiving intravenous streptokinase (39 +/- 17 mg/dl) than the levels in those receiving intracoronary streptokinase (88 +/- 70 mg/dl) (p less than .05) but were similar 24 hr after streptokinase in the two groups. Bleeding requiring transfusion occurred in one patient in each group. Thus, in this prospective randomized trial of intracoronary vs intravenous streptokinase, hemorrhagic complications were few, although both regimens produced a systemic lytic state. Although the thrombolytic efficacy of intracoronary streptokinase was superior to that of high-dose, short-term intravenous streptokinase, the higher-dose intravenous regimen (1 million IU over 45 min) achieved thrombolysis in a significant minority (44%) of patients and might be useful therapy for patients not having access to emergency catheterization.     

Importance of early initiation of intravenous streptokinase therapy for acute myocardial infarction

The importance of timing of intravenous streptokinase (SK) administration in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was evaluated. Intravenous SK, 750,000 U, was administered within 4 hours of the onset of ischemic chest pain to 72 consecutive patients having their first AMI. Six days later, cardiac catheterization was performed to calculate global ejection fraction (EF), and computer-derived infarct-related regional EF and dysfunction index were also determined; electrocardiograms were recorded, from which QRS scores could be calculated to estimate infarct size. Of 19 patients who had an anterior AMI, 12 (63%) who received intravenous SK within 2 hours after onset of pain sustained only minimal damage in terms of global EF, infarct-related EF, dysfunction index and QRS score. All 10 patients who received SK 2 to 4 hours after pain onset had large infarcts (p less than 0.001). Of the former group, 11 of 12 patients (91%) whose pain was relieved within 1.5 hours of intravenous SK administration (presumably due to successful reperfusion) had a good outcome, whereas all 7 whose pain lasted longer did poorly (p less than 0.001). Furthermore, among patients with anterior AMI, 11 of 14 (79%) whose pain was relieved within 3.5 hours of onset had small infarcts, compared with none of the 12 patients whose pain lasted longer (p less than 0.0001). In inferior AMI, the critical time between onset of pain and initiation of intravenous SK was 1.5 hours (p less than 0.05). The timing of initiation of thrombolytic therapy and the total pain duration are critical in determining outcome in AMI, and time intervals vary depending on infarct localization.     

Serum-sickness-like illness as a complication after streptokinase therapy for acute myocardial infarction

We report a case of serum-sickness-like illness in a 47-year-old patient who received early high-dose intravenous and intracoronary streptokinase following acute myocardial infarction. The picture comprised severe arthralgias, fever, an urticarial rash and marked elevation of circulating immune complexes. This case represents a rare complication of streptokinase therapy.     

A double-blind randomized multicenter dose-ranging trial of intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction

Intravenous streptokinase administration is now a widely applied therapy for patients in the early hours of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The dosages used do not appear to be based on comparative clinical investigations. Therefore a double-blind randomized trial was carried out to establish the optimal dose of streptokinase. A total of 189 patients who had symptoms of AMI for less than 4 hours were treated with 200,000, 750,000, 1,500,000 or 3,000,000 IU streptokinase intravenously. At coronary angiography 2.8 +/- 2.7 hours (mean +/- standard deviation) after the start of streptokinase infusion, patency of the infarct-related coronary artery was observed in 38, 75, 60 and 82% of the patients, respectively, in the 4 groups. The result of the dosage of 200,000 IU was significantly poorer than that of the other dosages (p less than 0.01). The result of a dosage of 3,000,000 IU was significantly better than that of 1,500,000 IU (p less than 0.05), but the differences with 750,000 IU were not significant. Blood transfusion was required in 4 patients (2%), distributed over the 4 groups in 0, 2, 1 and 1 of the patients. One patient had major bleeding; this patient had been treated with 750,000 IU. The 3-month mortality-rate in the whole study population was 5%. Thus, of the 4 doses of streptokinase tested, 750,000 IU is the minimal therapeutic dosage, and the arguments for 1,500,000 IU as standard therapy for comparison with other fibrinolytic drugs are poor. The best results in this study were achieved with 3,000,000 IU, but further research will be needed to establish the efficacy and safety of this new regimen.     

Intravenous streptokinase in evolving acute myocardial infarction

Eighty-one consecutive patients presenting within 3 hours of the onset of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and without contraindications to thrombolytic or anticoagulant therapy received a 15- to 30-minute intravenous infusion of 750,000 or 1.5 million units of streptokinase (STK) followed by anticoagulation. Treatment was instituted 130 +/- 41 minutes after the onset of symptoms and reperfusion was achieved 36 +/- 26 minutes later. Reperfusion of the "infarct artery" was recognized by indirect clinical criteria in 78 patients (96%). In all 66 patients who underwent coronary angiography 3 to 7 days later, there was complete concordance between indirect and angiographic evidence of reperfusion. In 6 patients there was early reocclusion within 24 hours of treatment; in 4 of these patients, the artery was reopened with an additional dose of STK. Two elderly patients suffered an intracranial hemorrhage and there were 8 other major hemorrhagic complications, of which 7 were related to procedural trauma. Five patients (6.2%) died in the hospital. The results of intravenous STK thrombolytic therapy are compared with those of our previous study using intracoronary STK.     

Intracoronary streptokinase in evolving acute myocardial infarction

Intracoronary application of thrombolytic agents, particularly streptokinase, can recanalize arteries that had been totally occluded in patients with evolving acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Numerous uncontrolled trials have testified to the effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy in most patients in reestablishing flow to the infarct-related coronary artery. Follow-up of patients in whom reperfusion has been established has often demonstrated small but significant increases in the left ventricular ejection fraction. In contrast, in other patients in whom thrombolytic therapy failed to reopen the occluded vessel, the left ventricular ejection fraction usually does not change during follow-up. In most reported uncontrolled trials, few complications are described and the mortality rate in patients treated by this therapy may be lower than expected. These data have been used as the basis for widespread application of this technique in many catheterization laboratories around the world. Our initial experience at the University of Florida in 23 patients has not been as successful as other uncontrolled trials previously reported. Reperfusion was accomplished in only 12 patients. Of 17 who survived their AMI, only five demonstrated an improved left ventricular ejection fraction of at least 10%. Serious complications, including bleeding from catheterization sites or allergic reactions to streptokinase, occurred. Controlled trials to critically evaluate this new therapy are needed and are in progress.     

Acute myocardial infarction during streptokinase therapy

A 45-year-old man developed sequential inferolateral and anterior myocardial infarctions within 10 hours of a possible allergic reaction to oral penicillin. The anterior myocardial infarction occurred during apparently successful streptokinase therapy for the initial inferolateral infarction. Subsequent coronary arteriography confirmed a subtotal stenosis of the left circumflex coronary artery and a complete thrombotic occlusion of the left anterior descending artery. This case documents the occurrence of three rare clinical phenomena; first, the occurrence of sequential acute myocardial infarctions in close temporal proximity; second, the occurrence of myocardial infarction during thrombolytic therapy; and third, the association of myocardial infarction with a possible allergic reaction.     

A randomized, angiographically controlled trial of intracoronary streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction

Fifty-five patients with acute myocardial infarction evaluated within 4 hours of the onset of symptoms were entered into an angiographically controlled trial of intracoronary streptokinase (IC STK). Forty-three patients with total occlusion of their infarct artery were randomized to either IC STK or intracoronary nitroglycerin (IC NTG), and 12 patients with less-than-complete occlusion received only IC NTG. Reperfusion of a totally occluded vessel was achieved in 69% of STK patients and 17% of IC NTG patients. Time from onset of symptoms to peak CK activity was significantly shorter in reperfused patients and patients with subtotal occlusion on initial angiography than in patients with total occlusion who were not reperfused (p less than 0.0001). Comparison of radionuclide ejection fractions (EF) determined acutely and 10 to 14 days after infarction failed to show improvement in either the STK or IC NTG group (mean decrease of 2.8% and 0.4%, respectively). In contrast, patients with subtotal occlusion on baseline angiography demonstrated a significant (p = 0.05) spontaneous improvement in EF over 2 weeks (7.3% increase).