脑卒中专门化生存质量量表(SS-QOL)中译本在冀南地区效度的研究

目的:探讨脑卒中专门化生存质量量表译本的效度。方法:对112名冀南地区脑卒中患者采用Rankin量表分级作为外在效标以评估辨别效度,同时进行卒中后1个月的NIHSS、Zung抑郁表、MMSE、Bathel指数、SF-36量表评定,以此作为“准金标准”,通过相关分析考察量表的效标效度。结果:随访发病后60例轻、中度脑卒中患者,SS-QOL译本以Rankin量表为外在效标的分组中,得分之间有显著差异。SS-QOL译本各领域显示与对应“标准”呈一定的相关性(相关系数0．37～0．89,P＜0．001)。结论:SS-QOL中译本在冀南地区轻、中度脑卒中患者中具有良好的效度。     

Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Clinical stroke trials are increasingly measuring patient-centered outcomes such as functional status and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). No stroke-specific HRQOL measure is currently available. This study presents the initial development of a valid, reliable, and responsive stroke-specific quality of life (SS-QOL) measure, for use in stroke trials. METHODS: Domains and items for the SS-QOL were developed from patient interviews. The SS-QOL, Short Form 36, Beck Depression Inventory, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and Barthel Index were administered to patients 1 and 3 months after ischemic stroke. Items were eliminated with the use of standard psychometric criteria. Construct validity was assessed by comparing domain scores with similar domains of established measures. Domain responsiveness was assessed with standardized effect sizes. RESULTS: All 12 domains of the SS-QOL were unidimensional. In the final 49-item scale, all domains demonstrated excellent internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha values for each domain >/=0.73). Most domains were moderately correlated with similar domains of established outcome measures (r2 range, 0.3 to 0.5). Most domains were responsive to change (standardized effect sizes >0.4). One- and 3-month SS-QOL scores were associated with patients' self-report of HRQOL compared with before their stroke (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The SS-QOL measures HRQOL, its primary underlying construct, in stroke patients. Preliminary results regarding the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the SS-QOL are encouraging. Further studies in diverse stroke populations are needed.     

脑卒中后生活质量量表3.0代理人版中文版的测试及评价

背景对于卒中的幸存者来说,生存质量是患者对于自身健康、生活满意程度、物理功能的主观评定.对于那些不能自己完成量表的卒中患者,我们可以尝试替代测量.然而迄今还没有学者将QOL的代理人量表引入中国.我们的研究目的是编译脑卒中生存质量影响量表(SIS 3.0)代理人版本,考察中文版的信度、效度和反应度,探讨代理人代替病人测试生存质量(QOL)的可行性.方法翻译(将原量表译成中文)和回译(将译文译回英文,与原文比较)原量表后,并作适当改进,然后对量表作心理学考评.选择10对病人及其代理人进行初试,再另选231对病人及代理人用于正式研究.病人的入选条件年龄＞18岁;脑卒中患者(包括脑出血和脑梗死);脑卒中的诊断符合WHO 诊断标准;且都有CT/MR证据.排除条件为TIA;卒中前有永久性残疾;严重的合并症(Ⅲ-Ⅳ级心衰,必须血液透析,严重的肌肉骨骼疾患影响物理功能,癌症,活动期精神病或痴呆,AIDS).代理人的入选条件年龄＞18岁;认识病人至少1年;每周与病人会面的次数至少1次,每次见面的时间至少1小时.排除条件精神状态简易速检表(MMSE)量表评分＜16分.对这些病人和代理人进行一系列量表的测试,包括SIS 3.0代理人版中文版,和其他公认的用于做测评工具的量表,包括医疗结局研究简表(medical outcomes study form 36, MOS SF-36)的中文版、Barthel指数(Barthel Index, BI)、汉密顿抑郁量表(HAMD)考察各个领域的标准效度.使用牛津残障评分(OHS)作为分组依据来考察SIS 3.0的反应度.我们选择了量表完成率和完成量表的时间两个指标来考察可行性;选用分半信度和克朗巴赫系数(α)来考察信度;选用内容效度、标准效度、结构效度来考察效度;通过比较不同残疾程度的病人的SIS 3.0得分来考察反应度.此外,我们比较了病人同代理人得分的差异.结果该中文版量表可行性好.分半信度和α系数均大于0.8,表明信度好.经专家评审后,认为表的内容与测试目的吻合.此外,量表各个测试条目得分与所属领域总分的Pearson相关系数在0.620～0.969之间,P值＜0.01.因子分析结果表明量表的结构与设计时的构想基本吻合.因为目前缺乏"交流"领域金标准,因此没有作该领域的标准效度检验.剩余的七个领域与已知公认量表的相应领域高度相关,Pearson相关系数＞0.5,P=0.000,具有良好的相关性,说明标准效度好.牛津残障评分(OHS)分组下的单因素方差分析显示量表可以区分不同残疾程度的病人,且随着病人残疾程度的加重,QOL评分总体呈下降趋势,表明反应度好.使用配对t检验和组间相关系数,分领域考察病人和代理人得分的差异,结果表明无统计学差异.结论 SIS 3.0代理人版中文版的信度、效度和反应度是满意的,用代理人代替病人进行QOL研究是可行的.     

Development and validation of NEWSQOL, the Newcastle Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Measure

BACKGROUND: A review of stroke-specific quality of life (QOL) measures indicated little evidence of their validity/reliability. PURPOSE: To describe the development/validation of a new measure - the Newcastle Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Measure (NEWSQOL). METHODS: Phase I: qualitative interviews (28 stroke patients) determined QOL issues for inclusion in the measure. Initial items/response categories were pre-tested (30 patients). Administration of the NEWSQOL in the item reduction stage (100 patients) identified poorly performing items and factor analysis showed likely domains. Internal consistency was examined. Phase II: NEWSQOL and comparator measures were administered (106 patients) to examine validity/test-retest reliability. RESULTS: Phase I: 140 items were identified for initial inclusion. Qualitative pre-testing led to an extensive revision. Item reduction resulted in a final measure of 56 items in 11 domains (feelings, activities of daily living/self-care, cognition, mobility, emotion, sleep, interpersonal relationships, communication, pain/sensation, vision, fatigue; Cronbach's alpha = 0.71-0.90). Phase II: NEWSQOL domain scores, except cognition, were moderately/highly correlated (0.45-0.76) with relevant comparator measures. NEWSQOL domains feelings, communication and cognition low/moderately correlated with Barthel Index scores (-0.49 to -0.28), as predicted. Test-retest reliability was high (intraclass correlation coefficient range 0.78-0.92). CONCLUSIONS: NEWSQOL is an acceptable, patient-derived, interviewer-administered, stroke-specific QOL measure with evidence of reliability and validity, making it a promising instrument for assessing QOL after stroke. Involvement of relevant patients in determining the content and format considerably enhances confidence in its validity.     

Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales

No single outcome measure can describe or predict all dimensions of recovery and disability after acute stroke. Several scales have proven reliability and validity in stroke trials, including the National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS), the modified Rankin scale (mRS), the Barthel index (BI), the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS), and the stroke impact scale (SIS). Several scales have been combined in stroke trials to derive a global statistic to better define the effect of acute interventions, although this composite statistic is not clinically tenable. In practice, the NIHSS is useful for early prognostication and serial assessment, whereas the BI is useful for planning rehabilitative strategies. The mRS and GOS provide summary measures of outcome and might be most relevant to clinicians and patients considering early intervention. The SIS was designed to measure the patient's perspective on the effect of stroke. Familiarity with these scales could improve clinicians' interpretation of stroke research and their clinical decision-making.     

Evaluation of the German Translation of the Stroke Impact Scale Using Rasch Analysis

To assess the complex and heterogeneous consequences of stroke, currently comprehensive patient-centered measures, like the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS), are increasingly being developed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the German translation of the SIS using Rasch analyses. A total of 196 patients with stroke from 16 study centers participated in the study. In tests for item fit, 7 of the 64 items displayed model misfit. Response categories of 25 items showed threshold disordering. Person separation reliability lay above.80 in six domains. No differential item functioning was detected with respect to age, gender, disability severity, and setting. The results provide support for validity and reliability of the SIS, and also point out issues for further improvement and adaptation of the SIS.     

A preliminary examination of the validity and reliability of a new brief rating scale for symptom domains of psychosis: Brief Evaluation of Psychosis Symptom Domains (BE-PSD)

BackgroundBrief assessments have the potential to be widely adopted as outcome measures in research but also routine clinical practice. Existing brief rating scales that assess symptoms of schizophrenia or psychosis have a number of limitations including inability to capture five symptom domains of psychosis and a lack of clearly defined operational anchor points for scoring.MethodsWe developed a new brief rating scale for five symptom domains of psychosis with clearly defined operational anchor points – the Brief Evaluation of Psychosis Symptom Domains (BE-PSD). To examine the psychometric properties of the BE-PSD, fifty patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were included in this preliminary cross-sectional study. To test the convergent and discriminant validity of the BE-PSD, correlational analyses were employed using the consensus Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) five-factor model. To examine the inter-rater reliability of the BE-PSD, single measures intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for 11 patients.ResultsThe BE-PSD domain scores demonstrated high convergent validity with the corresponding PANSS factor score (r_s = 0.81–0.93) as well as good discriminant validity, as evidenced by lower correlations with the other PANSS factors (r_s = 0.23–0.62). The BE-PSD also demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability for each of the domain scores and the total scores (ICC(2,1) = 0.79–0.96).ConclusionsThe present preliminary study found the BE-PSD measure to be valid and reliable; however, further studies are needed to establish the psychometric properties of the BE-PSD because of the limitations such as the small sample size and lacking data on test-retest reliability or sensitivity to change.     

The psychometric properties of the Parkinson's Impact Scale (PIMS) as a measure of quality of life in Parkinson's disease

We have previously designed and validated a 10-item bilingual questionnaire, the Parkinson's Impact Scale (PIMS), as a disease-specific instrument to measure the impact of Parkinson's disease (PD) on the quality of life of patients with PD. In this paper we extend the psychometric assessment of PIMS to a new set of patients, in the context of a cross-over trial by Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, comparing two doses of tolcapone in 116 PD patients who had developed wearing off effect on levodopa. Using data from this trial, we evaluate PIMS' test-retest reliability, construct validity, sensitivity and responsiveness to change. Validation is carried out by correlating the PIMS scores with corresponding UPDRS subscales and with the Schwab and England scale. We show that PIMS has excellent psychometric properties, and can therefore be used not only in clinical trials but also to identify quickly potential problems in major subjective areas of PD patients' lives, in order to refer them effectively to appropriate providers of assistance.     

Multidimensional assessment of the Panic-Agoraphobic Spectrum: reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the PAS-SR

The present study reports on the psychometric properties of the adaptation into Spanish of the Panic-Agoraphobic Spectrum Self-Report (PAS-SR). Drawing on a dimensional and longitudinal perspective of psychopathology, the PAS-SR was designed to measure a wide array of lifetime Panic-Agoraphobic features. Participants included outpatients with a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of panic disorder (n=26) or major depression (n=28), and a normal control group (n=41). Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were excellent for the total score, and moderate to excellent for most domains. Significant and high correlations between PAS-SR scores and instruments measuring similar constructs indicated good concurrent validity. The findings support the discriminant validity of the questionnaire. Patients with a diagnosis of panic disorder attained higher scores than normal controls on all domains, and displayed higher scores than patients with major depression on five of the eight domains.     

Evaluation of the American Heart Association Stroke Outcome Classification.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the concurrent validity of the American Heart Association Stroke Outcome Classification (AHA.SOC) and compare performance of its function classification with that of the Modified Rankin Scale. METHODS: The individuals in this study included the last 105 consecutive subjects who were part of a cohort of 459 stroke patients in the Kansas City Stroke Study. The patients were evaluated with a variety of standardized assessments at enrollment (within 14 days of stroke onset) and followed at 1, 3, and 6 months after stroke. Specifically, we examined validity of AHA.SOC by comparing its 3 domains (ie, Domain, Severe, and Function) with stroke severity. We correlated AHA.SOC-Function with scores of the Barthel Index, Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Scale, and Medical Outcome Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) measures of physical function and mental health. Finally, we compared the discriminant ability of AHA.SOC-Function and the Modified Rankin Scale in assessing disability and handicap. These data were analyzed with the use of Spearman rank correlations and Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: All 3 domains of the AHA.SOC were significantly associated with stroke severity and scores of Barthel Index, Lawton IADL, and SF-36 physical function (all P<0.001). Both AHA.SOC-Function and the Modified Rankin Scale discriminated well the disabilities and handicap measured by Barthel Index, Lawton IADL, and SF-36 physical function (all P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The AHA.SOC was able to capture impairments, disabilities, and handicap after stroke. The AHA. SOC-Function performed equally as well as the Modified Rankin Scale in assessing disabilities related to basic activities of daily living but differentiated slightly better than the Modified Rankin Scale in assessing disabilities/handicap related to instrumental activities of daily living. Neither the AHA.SOC-Function nor the Modified Rankin Scale captured differences in mental health after stroke.     

Barthel index in a Middle-East country: translation, validity and reliability

BACKGROUND: In Iran, a Middle-East country, no disability scale has been translated and validated for use in stroke clinical trials. This study was designed to translate the Barthel Index and make its Persian translated form valid and reliable. METHODS: All items of the Barthel Index were translated into Persian. Also, the Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) was also translated to Persian. Telephone interview was used as the method of data acquisition. Two interviewers were chosen for this means in order to accelerate data gathering and measure interrater agreement. Samples were selected from Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center's Stroke Registry Unit, a WHO collaborating center in the center of Iran. All the patients were registered as stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). These patients were inhabitants of Isfahan Province who had suffered from stroke or ICH between 12 and 24 months before data acquisition. Chronbach's alpha, test-retest reliability, concurrent validity with MRS, interrater agreement and item analysis were done for the translated questionnaire. RESULTS: Translated questionnaires were filled by interview from 459 stroke patients. Their mean age was 68.11 +/- 11.59 years. 243 of them were male (52.9%). Cronbach's alpha was 0.9354. Spearman's correlation coefficient between translated Barthel Index scores and MRS scores was -0.912. Spearman's correlation coefficient between 2 scores, to determine test-retest reliability was 0.989. Concordance correlation to determine interrater agreement was 0.994. All corrected item-total correlations were greater than 0.5. CONCLUSIONS: The Persian translated version of the Barthel Index is a reliable and valid questionnaire for use in stroke clinical trials.     

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Narcolepsy Severity Scale in adult patients with narcolepsy type 1

ObjectiveTo evaluate reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Narcolepsy Severity Scale (NSS) in adult patients with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1).MethodsOne hundred and fifty-one adult patients (≥18 years) with NT1 were recruited. All filled out the 15-item Chinese version of NSS. Item analysis included critical ratio and correlation analysis. The validity of NSS was assessed by exploratory factor analysis, discriminant validity and convergent validity. Reliability of NSS was assessed by Cronbach's α coefficient, spilt-half reliability and test-retest reliability.ResultsCritical value of all 15 items ranged from 3.01 to 13.36. Each item was significantly correlated with the total score by a correlation coefficient (r) ranging from 0.219 to 0.700. Three common domains were extracted and 15 items explained 54.86% of the total variance. There was a shift in domains compared to the English version likely due to cultural differences. Cronbach's α coefficient for the total scale of 15 items was 0.821 and for three factors was 0.726, 0.748 and 0.760 respectively. The NSS had good correlation with Epworth sleepiness scale scores, Insomnia severity index scores and moderate correlation with mean the sleep latency of polysomnographic recording, and European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Questionnaire. The Chinese version of NSS showed good spilt-half reliability and test-retest reliability.ConclusionThe Chinese version of NSS shows satisfactory psychometric properties with good validity and reliability. It is applicable to evaluate the severity and consequences of symptoms in Chinese adult patients with NT1.     

Psychometric characteristics of the aberrant behavior checklist

Information was presented on the psychometric characteristics of the Aberrant Behavior Checklist. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the Checklist appeared to be very good. Interrater reliability tended to vary across raters and subscales and ranged from mediocre to good but was generally in the moderate range and acceptable for research purposes. Validity was assessed by comparing Checklist scores for residents presenting with attributes thought to reflect varying degrees of social adaptation. Validity was also evaluated by comparing Aberrant Behavior Checklist scores with ratings on adaptive behavior scales and with objective observations of behavior. In general, validity was established for most Aberrant Behavior Checklist subscales. Preliminary data from drug investigations suggested that the Checklist may provide a useful adjunct for the assessment of psychotropic drug effects.     

Reliability and validity of a Norwegian version of the quality of life in epilepsy inventory (QOLIE-89)

PURPOSE: To develop a Norwegian version of the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-89) and to confirm its psychometric properties. METHODS: The QOLIE-89 was adapted to Norwegian language through a translation-backtranslation procedure. The assessment included 397 patients with epilepsy. We assessed internal consistency and test-retest reliabilities. Construct validity was assessed by correlating scales with items of the 15D health status questionnaire, and discriminant validity was assessed by comparing scores for known groups. RESULTS: The internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha, 0.76-0.92) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.67-0.96) for the individual domains were acceptable. Spearman's rank correlations between QOLIE-89 domain scores and corresponding 15D single-item scores were high (p, 0.47-0.76), and generally higher than the associations between noncorresponding items. Most QOLIE-89 items discriminated well between patients according to seizure status, psychiatric comorbidity, and working status; less well after antiepileptic drug use and neurologic comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: In this cross-sectional survey, the Norwegian version of the QOLIE-89 was reliable and showed properties supporting construct validity, at a level comparable with the original U.S. version.     

Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale

We designed a 15-item neurologic examination stroke scale for use in acute stroke therapy trials. In a study of 24 stroke patients, interrater reliability for the scale was found to be high (mean kappa = 0.69), and test-retest reliability was also high (mean kappa = 0.66-0.77). Test-retest reliability did not differ significantly among a neurologist, a neurology house officer, a neurology nurse, or an emergency department nurse. The stroke scale validity was assessed by comparing the scale scores obtained prospectively on 65 acute stroke patients to the patients' infarction size as measured by computed tomography scan at 1 week and to the patients' clinical outcome as determined at 3 months. These correlations (scale-lesion size r = 0.68, scale-outcome r = 0.79) suggested acceptable examination and scale validity. Of the 15 test items, the most interrater reliable item (pupillary response) had low validity. Less reliable items such as upper or lower extremity motor function were more valid. We discuss methods for improving the reliability and validity of brief examination scales to be used in stroke therapy trials.     

Development and validation of a multiple ability self-report questionnaire

Abstract

We present results from three studies on the development and validation of the Multiple Ability Self-Report Questionnaire (MASQ), a self-report measure comprising items from five cognitive domains; language, visuo-perceptual, verbal memory, visual memory, and attention. In Study 1, we determined the content relevance of the questionnaire items. In Study 2, we assessed the basic psychometric properties (i.e., internal consistency and test-retest reliability) of the MASQ in 118 individuals without neurologic or psychiatric disorder, aged 25 to 88 years. In Study 3 we provide validity data for the MASQ by comparing the ratings of normals to people with unilateral temporal-lobe epilepsy, and examining the relationship of self-report to objective test performance. The potential use of the MASQ to study the neurologic and psychological correlates of accuracy and unawareness in self-appraisal across different cognitive domains and various clinical groups is discussed.     

Development of the Bipolar Inventory of Symptoms Scale: concurrent validity, discriminant validity and retest reliability

Scales used in studies of bipolar disorder have generally been standardized with major depressive or hospitalized manic patients. A clinician rated scale based on a semi-structured interview for persons with bipolar disorder, with comprehensive coverage of bipolar symptomatology, is needed. We report concurrent, divergent and convergent psychometric reliability, discriminant validity and relationship to a measure of overall function for a new psychometric rating instrument. A primarily outpatient sample of 224 subjects was assessed using the Bipolar Inventory of Symptoms Scale (BISS). The BISS total score and depression and mania subscales were compared to the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF). Clinical mood states were also compared using the BISS. The BISS scores demonstrated good concurrent validity, with estimates (Pearson correlations) ranging from 0.74 to 0.94 for YMRS and MADRS and test-retest reliability from 0.95 to 0.98. BISS concurrent validity with the GAF was significant for four clinical states, but not mixed states. The BISS discriminated primary bipolar mood states as well as subjects recovered for eight weeks compared to healthy controls. In conclusion, the BISS is a reliable and valid instrument broadly applicable in clinical research to assess the comprehensive domains of bipolar disorder. Future directions include factor analysis and sensitivity to change from treatment studies.     

Development and Validation of the Stroke Knowledge Test

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a measure of stroke knowledge (the Stroke Knowledge Test [SKT]) using a systematic test construction process and to investigate the psychometric properties of this test. There are relatively few published measures of stroke knowledge, and, of those that exist, relatively little is documented about test construction or psychometric properties. Such tests are important for evaluation of stroke education programs. Method: Test construction involved systematic generation of pilot test items, expert review of pilot items, and calculation of pilot item properties. After final item selection, two experiments were conducted to determine if the SKT was sensitive to varying levels of stroke knowledge and to estimate the reliability of the test. Results: The final version of the test included 20 items with good content coverage, acceptable item properties, and positive expert review ratings. Results from psychometric investigations suggest that SKT has relatively good reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability) and construct validity (i.e., SKT scores significantly increased after stroke education [cf. nonstroke education], and community-dwelling older adults who had a relative with stroke [and more prior exposure to stroke information] scored higher on the SKT than those without a stroke relative). Conclusion: Findings provide preliminary support for the SKT as a valid and reliable tool for assessing stroke knowledge. The SKT may be used to identify individual information needs of stroke survivors and their caregivers or as a tool to evaluate group- or community-based stroke education programs.     

Synthesis of the psychometric properties of the PTSD checklist (PCL) military, civilian, and specific versions

The posttraumatic stress disorder checklist is a commonly used measure, with military (PCL-M), civilian (PCL-C), and specific trauma (PCL-S) versions. This synthesis of the psychometric properties of all three versions found the PCL to be a well-validated measure. The PCL shows good temporal stability, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity. The majority of structural validity studies support four factor models. Little is available on discriminant validity and sensitivity to change. Strengths, limitations, and future research directions are discussed. Understanding the PCL's psychometric properties, strengths (e.g., items map on to DSM-IV diagnostic criteria), and limitations (e.g., may overestimate PTSD prevalence) will help clinicians and researchers make educated decisions regarding the appropriate use of this measure in their particular setting.     

Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation: Results of the Initial Psychometric Study

Measurement of social cognition in treatment trials remains problematic due to poor and limited psychometric data for many tasks. As part of the Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation (SCOPE) study, the psychometric properties of 8 tasks were assessed. One hundred and seventy-nine stable outpatients with schizophrenia and 104 healthy controls completed the battery at baseline and a 2–4-week retest period at 2 sites. Tasks included the Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ), Bell Lysaker Emotion Recognition Task (BLERT), Penn Emotion Recognition Task (ER-40), Relationships Across Domains (RAD), Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task (Eyes), The Awareness of Social Inferences Test (TASIT), Hinting Task, and Trustworthiness Task. Tasks were evaluated on: (i) test-retest reliability, (ii) utility as a repeated measure, (iii) relationship to functional outcome, (iv) practicality and tolerability, (v) sensitivity to group differences, and (vi) internal consistency. The BLERT and Hinting task showed the strongest psychometric properties across all evaluation criteria and are recommended for use in clinical trials. The ER-40, Eyes Task, and TASIT showed somewhat weaker psychometric properties and require further study. The AIHQ, RAD, and Trustworthiness Task showed poorer psychometric properties that suggest caution for their use in clinical trials.Key words: schizophrenia, measurement, reliability, validity, emotion processing, social perception, mental state attribution