Clinical Use of Sonohysterography in the Evaluation of Infertility

Assessment of tubal patency and evaluation of the uterine cavity should be part of all infertility investigations. Sonohysterography (SHSG), also referred to as saline-enhanced ultrasonography, is being used with increasing frequency for investigation of infertility and other gynaecological indications. Sonohysterography is similar to hysterosalpingography (HSG) in its effectiveness for evaluating tubal patency, and superior to HSG for assessing intrauterine abnormalities. Advantages of SHSG over HSG include the ability to assess extrauterine structures, lack of ionizing radiation, and often better tolerability by the woman being examined. Sonohysterography can offer detailed assessment of the female pelvis, and has the potential to replace HSG as a routine, first-line infertility investigation. This paper discusses the technique and indications for SHSG, and reviews its use in infertility investigation, in particular in the assessment of the uterine cavity and tubal patency.     

Intrauterine insemination results are not affected if Hysterosalpingo Contrast Sonography is used as the sole test of tubal patency

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether women can be assigned to intrauterine insemination (IUI) treatment on the basis of fallopian tubal patency, diagnosed by Hysterosalpingo Contrast Sonography (Hy Co Sy). DESIGN: Case controlled, clinical study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENT(S): The cases were consecutive, infertile women who underwent Hy Co Sy and IUI. The control group was women who had IUI over the same period but whose tubal patency was assessed by hysterosalpingogram (HSG) or laparoscopy and dye (lap and dye). INTERVENTION(S): Women with bilateral patency at Hy Co Sy and with unexplained, anovulatory, or male factor infertility underwent IUI using the partner's (IUI-H) or donor's (IUI-D) semen. Their outcome was compared with that of cohorts of women who had been examined using HSG or lap and dye. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT(S): Clinical pregnancy rate per cycle and cumulative pregnancy rates at IUI-H or IUI-D. RESULT(S): The clinical pregnancy rates per cycle at IUI-H or IUI-D did not differ among the three groups. The cumulative pregnancy rates after three cycles of IUI-H were 0.17, 0.15, and 0.17 in the Hy Co Sy, HSG, and lap and dye cohorts, respectively, and 0.69, 0.77, and 0.54 in the same groups after six cycles of IUI-D. There were no differences in the clinical characteristics or stimulation regimes used. CONCLUSION(S): Women screened as "normal" by Hy Co Sy may be allocated to treatments that rely on accurate assessment of tubal patency without compromising their chance of conception.     

Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy

Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy (THL) is a modification of culdoscopy that can be used to evaluate the posterior uterus, pelvic sidewalls, and adnexae. Diagnostic THL can be done in the office under local anesthesia. Combined with diagnostic hysteroscopy and chromotubation, it can replace hysterosalpingography (HSG) as the first-line diagnostic test for the infertile woman. Studies have shown high patient tolerability with less pain reported postprocedure than with HSG. THL has been shown to have a high concordance with HSG for tubal patency, but THL diagnosed more intrauterine abnormalities as well as finding adhesions and endometriosis not visible with HSG. In addition, salpingoscopy may be performed during THL to assess the tubal lumen. THL also has a high concordance rate with laparoscopy when a complete evaluation is accomplished during THL. Complications of THL are uncommon and minor. Finally, operative procedures such as ovarian drilling, coagulation of endometriosis, lysis of adhesions, treatment of ovarian cysts, and salpingostomy may be performed via THL.     

Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy vs. conventional laparoscopy for evaluating unexplained primary infertility in women

OBJECTIVE: To verify the usefulness and reliability of transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy (THL) as a screening tool for evaluating infertility in women in comparison with conventional diagnostic laparoscopy. STUDY DESIGN: Sixty consecutive women with unexplained primary infertility were prospectively enrolled into the study. After examination of the whole pelvic cavity, tubal patency was evaluated and the uterine cavity studied by hysteroscopy. Immediately after THL, conventional laparoscopy was performed. Main outcome measures were the success rate of accessing the pouch of Douglas, rate of complete examinations, rate of complications and accuracy of THL in comparison with laparoscopy. RESULTS: Success rate of accessing the pouch of Douglas and performing THL was 93.3%. The rate of complete evaluation of all the pelvic structures was 76.8%. In studying tubal pathology, 77.8% agreement was found between the two techniques. Diagnosis of endometriosis was correct in 55.5% of patients. Overall, THL results correlated closely with conventional laparoscopic results in 92.86%, but the diagnostic accuracy of THL was 100% in cases of complete pelvic evaluation. CONCLUSION: THL is a feasible, reliable and safe procedure and can be considered an alternative procedure for evaluating infertility in women. In cases of incomplete pelvic evaluation or abnormal findings, conventional laparoscopy is indicated as the second step in the evaluation.     

The validity of air and saline hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography in tubal patency investigation before insemination treatment

OBJECTIVE: To compare the prognostic significance of tubal patency investigation by means of laparoscopy, hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy) with air and saline as a contrast medium, and hysterosalpingography (HSG) in relation to the outcome of intrauterine insemination (IUI) treatment. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study of 559 consecutive women attending the university hospital infertility clinic for infertility treatment in 1996-2003. Tubal patency was evaluated by laparoscopy in 261 women, by HyCoSy in 217 and by HSG in 81 women before insemination treatment. Altogether, 1240 insemination cycles were evaluated and the results were compared in the three study groups. RESULTS: The clinical pregnancy rates per cycle were 14%, 18% and 18% in the laparoscopic, HyCoSy and HSG groups, with no statistically significant difference between the groups. The cumulative pregnancy rates (mean 2.3 cycles) were 30%, 41% and 38%, respectively, with a significant difference between the study groups. In cases of unilateral patency, cumulative pregnancy rates after two cycles were 18% (laparoscopy), 29% (HyCoSy) and 29% (HSG). The numbers of tubal pregnancies were similar in the subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with air and saline as a contrast medium is a very cost-effective tubal investigation method as regards selection of subjects for insemination.     

Reliability of clinicians versus radiologists for detecting abnormalities on hysterosalpingogram films

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the consistency of the identification of abnormal findings on hysterosalpingogram (HSG) and compare the reliability of clinicians to that of radiologists.DESIGN: Evaluation of reliability of diagnostic test.PATIENT(S): Women undergoing evaluation for infertility.INTEVENTION(S): Retrospective review of 50 HSG films by three reproductive endocrinologists and three radiologists. Each film was reread 30 days later in a blinded fashion.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The consistency of each individual reader, the reliability of detecting specific abnormalities, and the consistency of clinicians compared with radiologists was evaluated with a kappa (K) statistic and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC).RESULT(S): Average intrareader reliability was high for the detection of normal uterus, normal tubes, and tubal obstruction and low for the detection of hydrosalpinx, uterine adhesions, and pelvic adhesions. Inter-reader reliability was high in the detection of normal uterine contour, normal tubal patency, and uterine filling defect and lower for the detection of a hydrosalpinx. The reliability of detecting pelvic adhesion or salpingitis isthmica nodosa was poor.CONCLUSION(S): Intrareader reliability was generally good, especially for the detection of normal findings. Agreement among different readers is lower in detecting rare outcomes such as hydrosalpinx and pelvic adhesion and salpingitis isthmica nodosa. Clinicians more reliably diagnose hydrosalpinx and tubal obstruction, while radiologists more reliably detect the more subtle findings of salpingitis isthmica nodosa or uterine adhesions.     

Abnormal findings on hysterosalpingography: effects on fecundity in a donor insemination program using frozen semen.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the effect of abnormal baseline hysterosalpingography (HSG) on subsequent fecundity during the first six cycles of treatment. METHODS: Hysterosalpingography was performed on 208 asymptomatic ovulatory women with no history of pelvic disease who were referred for donor insemination. The findings were categorized into five groups: 1) normal study, 2) uterine anomaly or filling defect with bilateral tubal patency, 3) normal uterine anatomy with unilateral tubal patency, 4) normal uterine anatomy with bilateral tubal blockage, and 5) normal uterine anatomy with hydrosalpinx. Subjects in groups 4 and 5 received inseminations only if patency of at least one fallopian tube was demonstrated with laparoscopy. Life-table analysis was performed to calculate the average monthly fecundity and cumulative conception rates for each group. The Mantel-Haenszel test was used to compare group fecundities. RESULTS: A total of 1460 donor insemination cycles were performed. The number of cycles in each group were as follows: group 1, 1173 (80%); group 2, 153 (10%); group 3, 90 (6.2%); group 4, 16 (1.1%); and group 5, 28 (1.9%). None of the patients in group 4 or 5 conceived. The cumulative conception rates in the first three groups were 46, 34, and 40%, respectively, and were not significantly different from one another (P greater than .05). Although a high incidence of uterine filling defects and unilateral tubal blockage was observed (19.2%), the incidence of an abnormal HSG finding that significantly decreased fecundity was only 2.8%. CONCLUSION: In women with no history of tubal or uterine disease, routine HSG before initiation of donor insemination is of limited value for identifying decreased treatment fecundity.     

Evaluation of outpatient hysteroscopy, saline infusion hysterosonography, and hysterosalpingography in infertile women: a prospective, randomized study

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy, pain scores, and procedure length of outpatient hysteroscopy (OHS), hysterosalpingography (HSG), and saline infusion hysterosonography (SIS) for evaluation of the uterine cavity of infertile women. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, investigator-blind study. SETTING: Tertiary infertility clinic. PATIENT(S): Forty-six consecutive infertile women. INTERVENTION(S): Outpatient HSG, OHS, and SIS, followed by operative hysteroscopy (HS). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Uterine abnormalities, procedure length, and subjective pain. RESULT(S): Fifty-nine percent of infertile subjects were found to have an abnormality on at least one of three outpatient uterine evaluations. When compared with the case of definitive operative HS, 60% of abnormalities were correctly classified by HSG, 72% by OHS, and 52% by SIS (P: NS). When comparing all combinations of 2 outpatient screening tests to operative hysteroscopy, 68% were correctly classified by HSG/OHS, 58% by HSG/SIS, and 64% by OHS/SIS (P: NS). The average time length for the OHS was 9.1 min., which was significantly greater than for both HSG (average, 5.3 min) and SIS (average, 6.1 min.) (P<.0001 for both). HSG and SIS were not statistically different regarding procedure time length. The average pain score (0-10) for SIS was 2.7, compared with 5.8 and 5.3 for HSG and OHS, respectively. Both HSG and OHS mean pain scores were significantly greater than the SIS mean. CONCLUSION(S): OHS, SIS, and HSG were statistically equivalent regarding evaluation of uterine cavity pathology in infertile women.     

Transvaginal salpingo-sonography (TSSG) in the evaluation of tubal patency.

Transvaginal sonography was used in 78 patients to evaluate tubal patency as a control in infertility workup. The cervix was fitted with a Semm cervix-adapter (Wisap); air and saline were injected through it. Careful scanning of the uterine angles and of the tubes permitted to demonstrate bilateral passage of the contrast medium in 52 of the 55 patients and monolateral passage in 3. 21 patients had also other conventional evaluations of tubal patency. Two patients were excluded from protocol. Total agreement with hysterosalpingography (HSG) was found in 69.2% of the cases, partial agreement in 23%. Total agreement with laparoscopy (LPS) was found in 83.3% of the cases. In conclusion transvaginal sonosalpingography (TSSG) can be used as a first ambulatorial evaluation of tubal patency in infertility work-up.     

Hysterosalpingography and selective salpingography in the differential diagnosis of chemical intrauterine versus tubal pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity of hystersalpingography (HSG) and/or bilateral selective salpingography in the differential diagnosis of early (biochemical) intrauterine versus intratubal abortions. DESIGN: The study design involved the performance of HSG and selective salpingography in sequential patients with low declining beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG) values. SETTING: Medical School-affiliated Infertility Center. PARTICIPANTS: Four sequential pregnant infertility patients who demonstrated declining beta-hCG levels before pregnancy could be confirmed by ultrasound (chemical pregnancies). RESULTS: Three of four patients demonstrated a characteristic tubal opacification pattern in conjunction with a normally appearing endometrial cavity, considered diagnostic of an early tubal pregnancy. In contrast, a missed intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) demonstrated a characteristically abnormal endometrial cavity. CONCLUSIONS: Some early (chemical) pregnancy losses are intratubal rather than intrauterine. The correct differential diagnosis of early missed IUPs versus intratubal pregnancies is important because of its prognostic significance.     

Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography compared with hysterosalpingography and laparoscopic dye pertubation to evaluate tubal patency

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the advantages and accuracy of hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy) in assessing tubal patency compared with hysterosalpingogram (HSG) and laparoscopic dye pertubation. DESIGN: Prospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, University of Rome Tor Vergata. PATIENTS: Twenty-three women with at least 1 year of infertility, and 15 women with a history of chronic pelvic pain, suspected endometriosis, or pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), or with sonographic markers of adhesions. INTERVENTIONS: HyCoSy, HSG, and laparoscopic dye pertubation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All patients underwent HyCoSy during the proliferative phase using air with saline as contrast medium, and HSG within 1 month of HyCoSy. Laparoscopy and dye pertubation were performed only in women with chronic pelvic pain, suspected endometriosis, PID, and sonographic markers of adhesions. In women undergoing all three procedures, HSG and HyCoSy had the same high concordance as laparoscopy, 86.7% and 86.7%, respectively. Three women in the infertility group became pregnant immediately after HyCoSy and dropped out of the study. In one woman, HyCoSy could not be performed because of cervical stenosis. Considering the total number of tubes (67), concordance between HyCoSy and HSG was 89.6%. CONCLUSION: Transvaginal HyCoSy using a combination of air and saline appears to be an inexpensive, fast, and well-tolerated method of determining tubal patency. One of the most important advantages of this technique is, in our opinion, the possibility of obtaining information on tubal status and the uterine cavity at the same time as conventional ultrasound scan is performed.     

Evaluation of tubal patency by transvaginal sonosalpingography.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate tubal patency by transvaginal sonosalpingography. DESIGN: Comparative study of transvaginal sonosalpingography with chromolaparoscopy in subjects with unknown tubal function. SETTING: Outpatient infertility clinic at Zeynep Kamil Maternity Hospital in Istanbul, Turkey. PATIENTS: Forty-two cases of unknown tubal function with infertility complaints were included. INTERVENTIONS: Isotonic saline was injected into the uterine cavity through a catheter. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Transvaginal sonosalpingography is a safe, easy, and cost-effective procedure for screening tubal status. RESULTS: The results obtained from transvaginal sonosalpingography and laparoscopy were completely consistent for 29 cases (76.32%) and partially consistent for 8 cases (21.05%). Transvaginal sonosalpingography accurately showed patency in 26 patients and bilateral nonpatency in 3 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Transvaginal sonosalpingography, with its accuracy and safety, is a promising screening and diagnostic technique in the evaluation of tubal patency on ambulatory basis.     

Investigation of the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes using three-dimensional saline sonohysterosalpingography.

OBJECTIVE: To compare three-dimensional saline sonohysterosalpingography (SHSG) to X-ray hysterosalpingography (HSG) for the evaluation of the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes. PATIENT POPULATION: Fifteen infertile women on whom X-ray HSG had been performed within 1 year prior to this study. METHOD: Fifteen infertile women underwent three-dimensional power Doppler examination of the uterus and fallopian tubes with three-dimensional SHSG during the follicular phase. Distension was achieved using sterile saline injected through a 5 French HSG catheter. Peritoneal accumulation of free fluid surrounding the ovary and tube was required for a diagnosis of a patent tube. Fluid accumulation in the cul-de-sac without visualization of the tubes was considered consistent with at least one tube being patent. RESULTS: three-dimensional saline SHSG was completed in 14 patients. One patient had cervical stenosis and the procedure could not be performed. No significant intrauterine pathology was identified by either X-ray HSG or sonography. Three-dimensional saline SHSG made false positive diagnoses of tubal occlusion in four out of seven fallopian tubes (57%). The sensitivity and specificity for detecting tubal occlusion was 75 and 83%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 40% and negative predictive value of 95%. Detection of fallopian tube architecture was not possible with three-dimensional saline SHSG in any patient. Simultaneous use of three-dimensional Doppler did not clearly identify the flow of saline through the fallopian tubes. CONCLUSIONS: Transvaginal three-dimensional saline SHSG provides good visualization of the uterine cavity and myometrial walls in three orthogonal planes. However, it does not diagnose tubal occlusion or depict architecture of the fallopian tube as accurately as X-ray HSG. Although we were able to visualize the distal fallopian tube and fimbria with real-time imaging, we were not able to satisfactorily image the proximal tube with three-dimensional power Doppler. This technique may be reserved as an initial screening test to evaluate the uterine cavity and test patency. Patients at high risk for tubal disease by history or with suspected tubal occlusion on three-dimensional saline SHSG should be evaluated by either X-ray HSG or laparoscopy with chromopertubation. Further improvements of three-dimensional technology and contrast materials will, it is hoped, make this method comparable to X-ray HSG.     

Characterizing the endometrium in unexplained and tubal factor infertility: a multiparametric investigation

OBJECTIVE: To characterize endometrial development in unexplained and tubal factor infertility. DESIGN: Prospective study of 20 women with unexplained infertility, 22 with tubal factor infertility, and 21 fertile controls in the midproliferative, periovulatory, and midluteal phases of the menstrual cycle. SETTING: Reproductive Medicine Department of St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom. PATIENT(S): Women awaiting assisted conception. INVESTIGATION(S): Serum hormone assays, transvaginal ultrasound, Doppler, and midluteal endometrial biopsies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Serum levels of E2, P, and LH, endometrial ultrasound morphometry, uterine and subendometrial artery Doppler, and endometrial histology and biochemistry. RESULT(S): Women with unexplained infertility demonstrated significantly reduced uterine artery flow velocity in all phases, significantly elevated uterine and subendometrial artery impedance in the periovulatory and midluteal phases, and significantly reduced endometrial texture in the midproliferative phase. Women with tubal factor infertility demonstrated significantly reduced uterine artery flow velocity, without a concomitant increase in impedance, and significantly greater expression of endometrial glandular and luminal keratan sulphate. CONCLUSION(S): Unexplained infertility is associated with a profound impairment of endometrial perfusion that might be amenable to treatment by perfusion enhancers. Tubal factor infertility is associated with endometrial developmental defects that might be corrected by salpingectomy. Endometrial ultrasound and Doppler studies are likely to become a vital tool in the investigation of infertility.     

The diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in infertility investigation

Four hundred and twenty infertile patients had hysterosalpingography (HSG) and laparoscopy as a part of their infertility workup. A comparison of HSG and laparoscopy findings was carried out to study the diagnostic value of each of these two procedures. It was found that the accuracy in the diagnosis of tubal patency or tubal blockage was quite similar for both procedures. However, laparoscopy revealed peritubal adhesions in 29.8% of patients, whereas HSG made an accurate diagnosis in only 8.8%. It is concluded that HSG is as accurate as laparoscopy in the diagnosis of tubal patency or blockage, and should remain an integral part of female infertility investigation. Laparoscopy excels HSG in the diagnosis of pelvic pathology and thus should always be performed whenever a pelvic factor is suspected in female infertility.     

Modified hysterosalpingography during infertility work-up: use of contrast medium and saline to investigate mechanical factors

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of modified hysterosalpingography using <3 mL amount of contrast medium followed by injection of saline to minimize the adverse effects associated with the procedure. DESIGN: For modified hysterosalpingography, 1-2 mL of water-soluble contrast medium were injected to visualize the uterine cavity, followed by injection of 10 mL of saline to check tubal patency and spillage. A control group of patients underwent hysterosalpingography with undiluted contrast medium. SETTING: Teaching hospital. PATIENT(S): Seventy-eight infertile women [study (n = 40)/control (n = 38) groups]. INTERVENTION(S): Modified and standard hysterosalpingography. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Assessment of uterine cavity, tubal patency, and sensation of pain during modified hysterosalpingography was compared with that during standard hysterosalpingography. RESULT(S): Uterine cavity and tubal patency were properly visualized during modified hysterosalpingography. Saline pushed the contrast medium successfully from the uterine cavity through the open fallopian tubes and into the pelvic cavity. The study group reported significantly less pain than did the control group. Between-group differences were statistically significant when pain perception (no pain vs. minimal pain vs. severe pain; no pain vs. any kind of pain) was analyzed by type of adnexal pathology (bilateral passage or unilateral passage). CONCLUSION(S): Modified hysterosalpingography was sufficient to diagnose tubal and pelvic mechanical factors. The procedure was associated with a significant reduction in self-reported pain and no medical complications.     

Office hysteroscopic-guided selective tubal chromopertubation: acceptability,feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of this new diagnostic non-invasive technique in infertile women

The aim of this study was to evaluate accuracy, tolerability and side effects of office hysteroscopic-guided chromoperturbations in infertile women without anaesthesia. Forty-nine infertile women underwent the procedure to evaluate tubal patency and the uterine cavity. Women with unilateral or bilateral tubal stenosis at hysteroscopy with chromoperturbation, and women with bilateral tubal patency who did not conceive during the period of six months, underwent laparoscopy with chromoperturbation. The results obtained from hysteroscopy and laparoscopy in the assessment of tubal patency were compared. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive-predictive value and negative-predictive value were used to describe diagnostic performance. Pain and tolerance were assessed during procedure using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Side effects or late complications and pregnancy rate were also recorded three and six months after the procedure. The specificity was 87.8% (95% CI: 73.80–95.90), sensitivity was 85.7% (95% CI 57.20–98.20), positive and negative predictive values were 70.6% (95% CI: 44.00–89) and 94.7% (95% CI: 82.30–99.40), respectively. Pregnancy rate (PR) within six months after performance of hysteroscopy with chromoperturbation was 27%. Office hysteroscopy-guided selective chromoperturbation in infertile patients is a valid technique to evaluate tubal patency and uterine cavity.     

Contrast Ultrasonography for Tubal Patency

Evaluation of tubal patency is an essential part of a fertility workup. Laparoscopy with chromopertubation in conjunction with hysteroscopy is the gold standard in evaluation of tubal patency and the uterine cavity. In this review article we describe a newer method for evaluation of the uterus and fallopian tubes, that is, hysterosalpingo–contrast sonography (HyCoSy). Accuracy of HyCoSy for tubal patency has been shown to be comparable to that with hysterosalpingography (HSG) when compared with laparoscopic chromopertubation. Sensitivity ranges from 75% to 96%, and specificity from 67% to 100%. HyCoSy is also accurate when compared with HSG in determining tubal occlusion after hysteroscopic sterilization, with 88% of patients stating they would prefer to undergo the tubal occlusion test in their gynecologist's office. Because HyCoSy also includes evaluation of the uterine cavity with saline solution–enhanced sonohysterography, accuracy in evaluating the uterine cavity is >90% when compared with hysteroscopy. HyCoSy enables the gynecologist to complete a fertility workup in the office in the most minimally invasive way. HyCoSy is well tolerated and has been suggested in the literature to replace HSG for evaluation of tubal disease in the subfertile population.     

Is hysterosalpingography an important tool in modern gynecological practice?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of hysterosalpingography (HSG) in diagnosing tubal patency and peritubal adhesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: HSG was followed whenever possible by diagnostic laparoscopy with chromopertubation to give the final prognosis in cases of infertility. RESULTS: Normal HSG findings were obtained in 669 women, and abnormal ones in 306. No significant correlation was found between age of patient, duration, type of infertility, and HSG findings. Tubal blockage was seen in 89.2% and uterine factor in 9.4% of cases. Peritubal adhesions were suggestive in 12.75% of cases. On laparoscopy, done in about half of these women, findings were in agreement with HSG in 59.87% of cases. Follow-up was carried out whether the woman conceived, had a laparotomy, or required further investigations. CONCLUSION: Although somewhat insensitive, the high specificity of hysterosalpingography makes it very helpful for ruling out tubal disease, even where endoscopic evaluation is available.