Pembrolizumab monotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced ovarian cancer: Subgroup analysis from the KEYNOTE‐100

Interim results from the two‐cohort, phase 2 KEYNOTE‐100 study (NCT02674061) of 376 patients with previously treated advanced recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) showed that pembrolizumab monotherapy was associated with an objective response rate (ORR) of 8.0% (95% CI, 5.4‐11.2). We present outcomes for the Japanese patients (n = 21) enrolled in KEYNOTE‐100. Patients with epithelial ROC had received either 1‐3 prior chemotherapy lines and had platinum‐free interval or treatment‐free interval (PFI; TFI) of 3‐12 months (cohort A) or 4‐6 prior chemotherapy lines and had PFI/TFI of ≥3 months (cohort B). All patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks as monotherapy for 2 years or until progression, death, unacceptable toxicity or consent withdrawal. Primary objectives were ORR per RECIST v1.1 for each cohort and higher programmed death ligand‐1 (PD‐L1) tumor expression. The relationship between PD‐L1 expression (measured as combined positive score [CPS]) and ORR was assessed. Twenty‐one Japanese patients (cohort A, n = 19; cohort B, n = 2) were treated. The median (range) age was 57 (37‐78) years; 19 (90.5%) patients had ECOG status of 0 and 16 (76.2%) patients had stage III‐IV disease. ORR was 19.0% (95% CI, 5.4‐41.9) and seemed to increase with increasing PD‐L1 expression. A total of 13 (61.9%) patients had treatment‐related adverse events (TRAE), and 5 (23.8%) had grade 3‐4 TRAE. There were no treatment‐related deaths in this subpopulation. Pembrolizumab monotherapy was associated with antitumor activity in Japanese patients with ROC, with no new safety signals identified in this subpopulation. The data suggested a trend toward higher PD‐L1 expression among some patients with higher ORR.     

Pembrolizumab as first-line therapy for patients with PD-L1-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase 1 trial

BackgroundPembrolizumab improved survival as first- and second-line therapy compared with chemotherapy in patients with highly programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expressing advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report the long-term safety and clinical activity of pembrolizumab as first-line therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC and the correlation between PD-L1 expression and efficacy.Patients and methodsIn the open-label phase 1b KEYNOTE-001 trial, treatment-naive patients with advanced NSCLC whose tumors expressed PD-L1 (≥1% staining, assessed using a prototype assay) were randomly assigned to intravenous pembrolizumab 2 or 10 mg/kg every 3 (Q3W) or 2 (Q2W) weeks. Response was assessed per central RECIST v1.1 every 9 weeks in all patients who received ≥1 pembrolizumab dose. Using pre-treatment tumor tissue, a clinical assay quantified the percentage of tumor cells expressing PD-L1 as tumor proportion score (TPS).ResultsBetween 1 March 2013 and 18 September 2015, 101 patients received pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg Q3W (n = 6), 10 mg/kg Q3W (n = 49), or 10 mg/kg Q2W (n = 46). Of these, 27 (26.7%) had TPS ≥50%, 52 (51.5%) had TPS 1%–49%, and 12 (11.9%) had TPS <1%. The objective response rate (ORR) was 27% (27/101, 95% CI 18–37) and median overall survival was 22.1 months (95% CI 17.1–27.2). In patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥50%, ORR, 12-month PFS, and 12-month OS were higher [14/27 (51.9%; 95% CI 32%–71%), 54%, and 85%, respectively] than the overall population [27/101 (26.7%; 95% CI 18.4%–36.5%), 35%, 71%]. Pembrolizumab was well tolerated, with only 12 (11.9%) patients experiencing grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events and no treatment-related deaths.ConclusionsPembrolizumab provides promising long-term OS benefit with a manageable safety profile for PD-L1-expressing treatment-naive advanced NSCLC, with greatest efficacy observed in patients with TPS ≥50%.Clinical trial name and numberKEYNOTE-001 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01295827).     

The efficacy and safety of anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 antibodies combined with chemotherapy or CTLA4 antibody as a first‐line treatment for advanced lung cancer

Checkpoint inhibitors show promising efficacy in advanced lung cancer, especially in non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This meta‐analysis was conducted to explore the therapeutic efficacy and safety of anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 antibodies combined with chemotherapy or CTLA4 antibody as first‐line treatments for patients with advanced lung cancer. A systematic search was performed in databases for this system review and quantitative meta‐analysis. Twelve trials were finally enrolled in the meta‐analysis. Our analyses revealed that the combined overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) for immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of NSCLC were 47.0% (95% CI: 34.2%‐60.2%) and 80.9% (95% CI: 69.4%‐88.7%), respectively. The combined ORR and DCR for CTLA4 antibody combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of small‐cell lung cancer (SCLC) were 65.4% (61.1%‐69.5%) and 87.6% (84.5%‐90.2%), respectively. The combined six‐month progression‐free survival rates (PFSRs_6m) for NSCLC and SCLC were 50.2% (95% CI: 21.9%‐78.4%) and 30.7% (21.2%‐40.3%), respectively, and the OSRs_1y were 56.4% (39.1%‐73.7%) and 36.9% (33.3%‐40.5%), respectively. In addition, the combined ORR and DCR for the checkpoint inhibitors plus CTLA4 antibody treatment group in NSCLC were 29.6% (95% CI: 11.4%‐57.8%) and 48.7% (16.8%‐81.7%), respectively. In subgroup analyses, a significant improvement in PFS was observed in NSCLC and SCLC, with a combined hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval of 0.841 (0.737‐0.961) and 0.856 (0.756‐0.968), respectively. In summary, synergistic activity and an acceptable safety profile were observed with checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy combination treatment in lung cancer.     

KEYNOTE-033: Randomized phase 3 study of pembrolizumab vs docetaxel in previously treated,PD-L1-positive,advanced NSCLC

KEYNOTE-033 (NCT02864394) was a multicountry, open-label, phase 3 study that compared pembrolizumab vs docetaxel in previously treated, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with most patients enrolled in mainland China. Eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg or docetaxel 75 mg/m² every 3 weeks. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival and were evaluated sequentially using stratified log-rank tests, first in patients with PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50% and then in patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥1% (significance threshold: P < .025, one-sided). A total of 425 patients were randomized to pembrolizumab (N = 213) or docetaxel (N = 212) between 8 September 2016 and 17 October 2018. In patients with a PD-L1 TPS ≥50% (n = 227), median OS was 12.3 months with pembrolizumab and 10.9 months with docetaxel; the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61-1.14; P = .1276). Because the significance threshold was not met, sequential testing of OS and PFS was ceased. In patients with a PD-L1 TPS ≥1%, the HR for OS for pembrolizumab vs docetaxel was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.60-0.95). In patients from mainland China (n = 311) with a PD-L1 TPS ≥1%, HR for OS was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.51-0.89). Incidence of grade 3 to 5 treatment-related AEs was 11.3% with pembrolizumab vs 47.5% with docetaxel. In summary, pembrolizumab improved OS vs docetaxel in previously treated, PD-L1-positive NSCLC without unexpected safety signals; although the statistical significance threshold was not reached, the numerical improvement is consistent with that previously observed for pembrolizumab in previously treated, advanced NSCLC.     

Looking for the best immune‐checkpoint inhibitor in pre‐treated NSCLC patients: An indirect comparison between nivolumab,pembrolizumab and atezolizumab

Immune‐checkpoint inhibitors represent the new standard of care in patients with advanced NSCLC who progressed after first‐line treatment. This work aim to assess any difference in both efficacy and safety profiles among Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab and Atezolizumab in pre‐treated NSCLC patients. Randomized clinical trials comparing immune‐checkpoint inhibitor versus docetaxel in pre‐treated patients with advanced NSCLC were included and direct comparison meta‐analysis of selected trials have been performed. Subsequently the summary estimates of Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab and Atezolizumab emerging from the direct meta‐analysis were selected to provide the pooled estimates of hazard ratio (HR) and relative risk (RR) for the indirect comparisons among these agents. A total of 5 studies met the selection criteria and were included in the meta‐analysis. Indirect comparisons for efficacy outcomes showed the RR for ORR nivolumab versus atezolizumab 1.66 (95% CI 1.07?2.58), pembrolizumab versus atezolizumab 1.94 (95% CI 1.30?2.90). No significant differences in both PFS and OS have been observed. Indirect comparisons for safety showed the RR for G3‐5 AEs nivolumab versus pembrolizumab 0.41 (95% CI 0.29?0.60), nivolumab versus atezolizumab 0.50 (95% CI 0.35?0.72). No significant differences in both pneumonitis and discontinuation rate have been observed. The results of this work revealed that nivolumab and pembrolizumab are associated with a significant increase of ORR as compared to atezolizumab and nivolumab is associated with a significant lower incidence of G3‐5 AEs as compared to the other drugs. These evidences could support the oncologists to select the best drug for each patient.     

Five Year Survival Update From KEYNOTE-010: Pembrolizumab Versus Docetaxel for Previously Treated,Programmed Death-Ligand 1–Positive Advanced NSCLC

IntroductionIn the KEYNOTE-010 study, pembrolizumab improved overall survival (OS) versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated, advanced NSCLC with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50% and ≥1%. We report 5-year efficacy and safety follow-up for the KEYNOTE-010 study.MethodsPatients were randomized to pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg once every 3 weeks or docetaxel 75 mg/m² once every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles (2 y). Patients who completed pembrolizumab treatment and subsequently had recurrence could receive second-course pembrolizumab for up to 17 cycles (1 y). Pembrolizumab doses were pooled in this analysis.ResultsA total of 1034 patients were randomized (pembrolizumab, n = 691; docetaxel, n = 343). Median study follow-up was 67.4 months (range: 60.0‒77.9). The hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for OS was 0.55 (0.44‒0.69) for patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥50% and 0.70 (0.61‒0.80) with PD-L1 TPS ≥1%. The 5-year OS rates for pembrolizumab versus docetaxel were 25.0% versus 8.2% in patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥50% and 15.6% versus 6.5% with PD-L1 TPS ≥1%. Among 79 patients who completed 35 cycles/2 years of pembrolizumab, the OS rate 3 years after completion (∼5 y from randomization) was 83.0%. A total of 21 patients received second-course pembrolizumab; 11 (52.4%) had an objective response after starting the second course and 15 (71.4%) were alive at data cutoff. Exploratory biomarker analysis revealed that higher tissue tumor mutational burden (≥175 mutations per exome) was associated with improved outcomes with pembrolizumab.ConclusionsPembrolizumab continued to provide long-term benefit than docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥50% and ≥1%. Our findings confirm pembrolizumab as a standard-of-care treatment in the second-line or later setting.     

Use of archival versus newly collected tumor samples for assessing PD-L1 expression and overall survival: an updated analysis of KEYNOTE-010 trial

BackgroundIn KEYNOTE-010, pembrolizumab versus docetaxel improved overall survival (OS) in patients with programmed death-1 protein (PD)-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A prespecified exploratory analysis compared outcomes in patients based on PD-L1 expression in archival versus newly collected tumor samples using recently updated survival data.Patients and methodsPD-L1 was assessed centrally by immunohistochemistry (22C3 antibody) in archival or newly collected tumor samples. Patients received pembrolizumab 2 or 10 mg/kg Q3W or docetaxel 75 mg/m² Q3W for 24 months or until progression/intolerable toxicity/other reason. Response was assessed by RECIST v1.1 every 9 weeks, survival every 2 months. Primary end points were OS and progression-free survival (PFS) in tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50% and ≥1%; pembrolizumab doses were pooled in this analysis.ResultsAt date cut-off of 24 March 2017, median follow-up was 31 months (range 23–41) representing 18 additional months of follow-up from the primary analysis. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel continued to improve OS in patients with previously treated, PD-L1-expressing advanced NSCLC; hazard ratio (HR) was 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57, 0.77]. Of 1033 patients analyzed, 455(44%) were enrolled based on archival samples and 578 (56%) on newly collected tumor samples. Approximately 40% of archival samples and 45% of newly collected tumor samples were PD-L1 TPS ≥50%. For TPS ≥50%, the OS HRs were 0.64 (95% CI: 0.45, 0.91) and 0.40 (95% CI: 0.28, 0.56) for archival and newly collected samples, respectively. In patients with TPS ≥1%, OS HRs were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.59, 0.93) and 0.59 (95% CI: 0.48, 0.73) for archival and newly collected samples, respectively. In TPS ≥50%, PFS HRs were similar across archival [0.63 (95% CI: 0.45, 0.89)] and newly collected samples [0.53 (95% CI: 0.38, 0.72)]. In patients with TPS ≥1%, PFS HRs were similar across archival [0.82 (95% CI: 0.66, 1.02)] and newly collected samples [0.83 (95% CI: 0.68, 1.02)].ConclusionPembrolizumab continued to improve OS over docetaxel in intention to treat population and in subsets of patients with newly collected and archival samples.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01905657.     

Differential Efficacy of Pembrolizumab According to Metastatic Sites in Patients With PD-L1 Strongly Positive (TPS ≥ 50%) NSCLC

BackgroundPembrolizumab has shown significantly better efficacy than platinum doublet chemotherapy in patients with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) strongly positive (tumor proportion score ≥ 50%) non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the predictors of response to pembrolizumab have not yet been fully elucidated for patients with PD-L1 strongly positive NSCLC.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 145 patients who had been treated with pembrolizumab for PD-L1 strongly positive (TPS ≥ 50%) NSCLC without an EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) mutation or ALK rearrangement from February 2017 to March 2020. Various clinical characteristics, including Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, treatment line, PD-L1 expression, C-reactive protein level, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, and metastatic sites, and the clinical outcome of pembrolizumab treatment were examined.ResultsPatients with higher PD-L1 expression (≥ 75%; n = 90) had a higher objective response rate (ORR) and longer progression-free survival (PFS) compared with those with lower expression (50%-74%; n = 55; ORR, 51% vs. 33%; P = .0305; median PFS, 13.9 months vs. 5.2 months; P = .0111). In addition, 15 patients with liver metastasis (LM) had a significantly lower ORR and shorter PFS than the 130 patients without LM (ORR, 20% vs. 47%; P = .0468; median PFS, 3.4 months vs. 9.4 months; P = .0018). A multivariate analysis indicated that PD-L1 expression and LM were significant predictors of PFS after pembrolizumab treatment (higher PD-L1 expression: hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.91; P = .0183; presence of LM: hazard ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-3.82; P = .0420).ConclusionPD-L1 expression and LM status were predictors of the efficacy of pembrolizumab in patients with PD-L1 strongly positive NSCLC.     

Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Tumor Proportion Score and Overall Survival From First-Line Pembrolizumab in Patients With Nonsquamous Versus Squamous NSCLC

IntroductionFor patients with NSCLC receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) has been validated as a predictive biomarker for improved overall survival (OS). Nevertheless, its histology-specific predictive value in patients with advanced squamous versus nonsquamous cancers remains unclear. To evaluate the differential value of PD-L1 TPS as a predictive biomarker for OS after first-line pembrolizumab in patients with squamous versus nonsquamous NSCLC.MethodsRetrospective, observational study of patients diagnosed with having advanced NSCLC who were treated between October 2015 and April 2019 at community oncology clinics and academic medical centers in a deidentified electronic health record–derived database. Included patients were diagnosed with having advanced or metastatic NSCLC, received treatment with first-line, single-agent pembrolizumab, and had documentation of PD-L1 testing with a numeric result. Exclusion criteria included alterations in EGFR, ALK, and ROS1. The primary end point was OS from start of first-line pembrolizumab therapy by squamous or nonsquamous histology and PD-1 expression level measured by TPS (low, <50% or high, ≥50%).ResultsThe cohort of 1460 patients with NSCLC who received pembrolizumab as a first-line therapy had a mean age of 72 years. Histology was 28% squamous and 72% nonsquamous. PD-L1 expression was low in 13% and high in 87%. No meaningful differences in age, sex, or smoking history were observed by PD-L1 TPS or histology type. A generalized gamma model adjusting for sex and stage at diagnosis found that for patients with nonsquamous histology, high PD-L1 TPS was significantly associated with improved OS by a median OS difference of 8.4 months (p < 0.001). In contrast, for patients with squamous histology, there was no evidence of association between PD-L1 expression level and OS (p = 0.283). PD-L1–related incremental differences in median OS between the patients with squamous and nonsquamous tumors were significantly different (p = 0.034).ConclusionsAmong patients with NSCLC treated with first-line pembrolizumab, high PD-L1 TPS is associated with OS among patients with nonsquamous NSCLC, but not among patients with squamous NSCLC.     

PD‐L1 expression associated with worse survival outcome in malignant pleural mesothelioma

1 Aim

There is currently a need to identify prognostic biomarkers to assist in a risk adopted approach in treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) has been studied as a prognostic biomarker in a number of tumors given its central role in antitumoral immune response evasion. Four previously published analyses found PD‐L1 positivity to be an adverse survival prognostic factor in MPM. This study aims to further investigate the relationship between PD‐L1 expression in mesothelioma tissues and survival outcome.

2 Methods

Clinical data of MPM patients from a single institution between 2006 and 2016 were reviewed. Patient's archived tissues were stained with PD‐L1 (Clone Ventana SP263). PD‐L1 positivity was defined as > 1% membranous staining regardless of intensity.

3 Results

Data from fifty eight patients were analyzed. Median age was 73, majority was male (49, 84%) and had ECOG between 0 and 2 (46, 79%). Most common histopathological subtype was epithelioid (42, 72%), 9 (16%) biphasic subtype and 7 (12%) sarcomatoid. Thirty one patients (53%) received best supportive care and twenty seven patients (47%) received chemotherapy or combination treatment. Forty‐two patients had positive PD‐L1 expression (72.4%). The median survival time for PD‐L1 negative group is 15.5 months and 6 months for the positive group. Positive PD‐L1 expression is independently correlated with worse prognosis (HR = 2.02; 95% CI, 1.005–4.057; P‐value = 0.0484).

4 Conclusions

Our analysis found a higher percentage of MPM patients with positive PD‐L1 (> 1%) compared to other studies. Highly positive PD‐L1 expression was associated with statistically significantly lower median survival time.     

Outcomes to first-line pembrolizumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and very high PD-L1 expression

BackgroundIn non-small-cell lung cancers with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on ≥50% of tumor cells, first-line treatment with the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab improves survival compared with platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Whether higher PD-L1 levels within the expression range of 50%–100% predict for even greater benefit to pembrolizumab is currently unknown.Patients and methodsIn this multicenter retrospective analysis, we analyzed the impact of PD-L1 expression levels on the overall response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS) in patients who received commercial pembrolizumab as first-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a PD-L1 expression of ≥50% and negative for genomic alterations in the EGFR and ALK genes.ResultsAmong 187 patients included in this analysis, the ORR was 44.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 37.1% to 51.8%], the mPFS was 6.5 months (95% CI 4.5–8.5), and the mOS was not reached. The median PD-L1 expression level among patients who experienced a response to pembrolizumab was significantly higher than among patients with stable or progressive disease (90% versus 75%, P < 0.001). Compared with patients with PD-L1 expression of 50%–89% (N = 107), patients with an expression level of 90%–100% (N = 80) had a significantly higher ORR (60.0% versus 32.7%, P < 0.001), a significantly longer mPFS [14.5 versus 4.1 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.50 (95% CI 0.33–0.74), P < 0.01], and a significantly longer mOS [not reached versus 15.9 months, HR 0.39 (95% CI 0.21–0.70), P = 0.002].ConclusionAmong patients with NSCLC and PD-L1 expression of ≥50% treated with first-line pembrolizumab, clinical outcomes are significantly improved in NSCLCs with a PD-L1 expression of ≥90%. These findings have implications for treatment selection as well as for clinical trial interpretation and design.     

Long‐term efficacy and predictive correlates of response to nivolumab in Japanese patients with esophageal cancer

The long‐term efficacy of nivolumab in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and its association with disease biomarkers are currently not well known. Therefore, we investigated the association in Japanese patients with treatment‐refractory advanced esophageal cancer who participated in an open‐label, single‐arm, multicenter phase II study. Patients received nivolumab 3 mg/kg i.v. every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, and were followed up for 2 years after the initial dosing of the last patient. Archival tissue samples were collected before treatment and analyzed for programmed death ligand‐1 (PD‐L1) and CD8⁺ status of tumors and tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and human leukocyte antigen class 1. Efficacy end‐points included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), time to response, and duration of response. Of 65 enrolled patients (83% male), 64 were evaluable for efficacy and 41 (63%) for biomarkers. The ORR, median OS, and survival rate were 17.2%, 10.78 months, and 17.2%, respectively. Time to response was 1.45 months and duration of response was 11.17 months. The PD‐L1 positivity of tumor cells was possibly associated with better PFS (2.04 vs 1.41 months, cut‐off 1%) and OS (11.33 vs 6.24 months, cut‐off 1%). Median OS was prolonged in patients with a median number of TILs greater than 63.75% vs 63.75% or less (11.33 vs 7.85 months). Nivolumab showed continued long‐term efficacy, as seen by the stability of PFS and OS, in Japanese patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Further investigation of PD‐L1 tumor expression and TILs as potential biomarkers for predicting patients likely to benefit from nivolumab therapy is warranted.     

Pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed-platinum for metastatic nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer: KEYNOTE-189 Japan Study

Pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed-platinum significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with manageable safety compared with placebo plus pemetrexed-platinum in patients with previously untreated metastatic nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without EGFR/ALK alterations in the global, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 KEYNOTE-189 study. We present results of Japanese patients enrolled in the KEYNOTE-189 global and Japan extension studies. Patients were randomized 2:1 to intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks (Q3W) for up to 35 cycles. All patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m² plus the investigator’s choice of cisplatin or carboplatin Q3W for four cycles, followed by maintenance pemetrexed 500 mg/m² Q3W (all intravenous). Co–primary endpoints were OS and PFS. Forty Japanese patients enrolled (pembrolizumab, n = 25; placebo, n = 15). At data cutoff (20 May 2019; median time from randomization to data cutoff, 18.5 [range, 14.7‒38.2] months), the median OS was not reached in the pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed-platinum arm; the median OS was 25.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.9‒29.0) months in the placebo plus pemetrexed-platinum arm (hazard ratio [HR] .29; 95% CI, .07‒1.15). The median (95% CI) PFS was 16.5 (8.8‒21.1) compared with 7.1 (4.7‒21.4) months (HR, .62; 95% CI, .27‒1.42), respectively. There were no grade 5 adverse events (AE). Grade 3/4 AE occurred in 72% vs 60% of patients in the pembrolizumab vs placebo arms; 40% vs 20% had immune-mediated AE, and 4% vs 0% had infusion reactions. Efficacy and safety outcomes were similar to those from the global study and support first-line therapy with pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed-platinum in Japanese patients with nonsquamous NSCLC without EGFR/ALK alterations.     

Multicenter phase II study of nivolumab in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma

Overexpression of programmed death‐1 (PD‐1) ligands contributes to an immunosuppressive microenvironment. Nivolumab is a PD‐1‐blocking antibody that inhibits the PD‐1 pathway and showed good efficacy in several types of malignancy. This phase II study examined the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in 17 Japanese patients with refractory/relapsed classical Hodgkin lymphoma previously treated with brentuximab vedotin. Sixteen patients were included in efficacy analyses and 17 in safety analyses. The primary endpoint was the centrally assessed objective response rate (ORR). The study was commenced in March 2015. We report data obtained at a cutoff of 16 March 2016, at which time 11 patients were still receiving nivolumab. The median (range) duration of treatment and follow‐up were 7.0 (1.4–10.6) months and 9.8 (6.0–11.1) months, respectively. All 17 patients had previously received brentuximab vedotin. The ORR was 81.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 54.4–96.0%; 13/16 patients), with complete remission and partial remission in 4 and 9 patients, respectively. The overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) rates at 6 months were 100 and 60.0% (95% CI: 31.8–79.7%), respectively; the median OS and PFS were not reached. The most common adverse events (AE) were pyrexia (41.2%), pruritus (35.3%), rash (35.3%) and hypothyroidism (29.4%). Four patients (23.5%) experienced grade 3 or 4 AE, but most AE were of grade 1 or 2. In conclusion, nivolumab is a potentially effective and tolerable treatment option for Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma previously treated with brentuximab vedotin.     

Phase II study of ceritinib in alectinib‐pretreated patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase‐rearranged metastatic non‐small‐cell lung cancer in Japan: ASCEND‐9

Clinical experience of ceritinib in patients who progressed on alectinib is limited. In this prospective phase II study, we evaluated the activity of ceritinib in alectinib‐pretreated patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)‐rearranged metastatic (stage IIIB/IV) non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan. All patients were required to have ≥1 measurable lesion per RECIST, 1.1, and a World Health Organization Performance Status (WHO PS) of 0‐1. Prior crizotinib and/or up to 1 chemotherapy regimen was allowed. Primary endpoint was investigator‐assessed overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. Ceritinib was given at a dose of 750 mg/day fasted. A total of 20 patients were enrolled from August 2015 to March 2017. All patients received prior alectinib (100%), 13 (65.0%) patients received prior platinum‐based chemotherapy, and 4 (20%) patients received prior crizotinib. Median duration of exposure and the follow‐up time with ceritinib were 3.7 months (range: 0.4‐15.1) and 11.6 months (range: 4.8‐23.0), respectively. Investigator‐assessed ORR was 25% (95% CI: 8.7‐49.1). Key secondary endpoints, all investigator assessed, included disease control rate (70.0%; 95% CI: 45.7‐88.1), time to response (median, 1.8 months; range: 1.8‐2.0), and duration of response (median, 6.3 months; 95% CI: 3.5‐9.2). Median progression‐free survival was 3.7 months (95% CI: 1.9‐5.3). The most common adverse events reported were diarrhea (85.0%), nausea (80.0%), and vomiting (65.0%). Based on our findings, ceritinib could be considered as one of the treatment options for patients with ALK‐positive NSCLC who progressed on alectinib. (Trial registration no. NCT02450903)     

Safety and efficacy of nivolumab in the treatment of cancers: A meta‐analysis of 27 prospective clinical trials

Immune checkpoint inhibition therapy has benefited people and shown powerful anti‐tumor activity during the past several years. Nivolumab, a fully human IgG4 monoclonal antibody against PD‐1, is a widely studied immune checkpoint inhibitor for the treatment of cancers. To assess the safety and efficacy of nivolumab, 27 clinical trials on nivolumab were analyzed. Results showed that the summary risks of all grade adverse effects (AEs) and grade ≥3 AEs were 0.65 and 0.12. The rate of nivolumab‐related death was 0.25%. The most common any grade AEs were fatigue (25.1%), rush (13.0%), pruritus (12.5%), diarrhea (12.1%), nausea (11.8%) and asthenia (10.4%). The most common grade ≥3 AEs were hypophosphatemia (only 2.3%) and lymphopenia (only 2.1%). The pooled objective response rate (ORR), 6‐month progression‐free survival (PFS) rate and 1‐year overall survival (OS) rate were 0.26, 0.40 and 0.52, respectively. The odds ratio of ORR between PD‐L1 positive and negative was 2.34 (95% CI 1.77–3.10, p < 0.0001). The odds ratios of ORR, 6‐month PFS rate and 1‐year OS rate between nivolumab and chemotherapeutics were 2.77 (95% CI 1.69–4.56, p < 0.0001), 1.97 (95% CI 1.02–3.81, p = 0.04) and 1.87 (95% CI 1.46–2.40, p <0.0001), respectively. In conclusion, nivolumab has durable outcomes with tolerable AEs and drug‐related deaths in cancer patients. Nivolumab monotherapy has better treatment response compared with chemotherapy, whereas chemotherapeutics have significantly higher risk of adverse effects than nivolumab.     

A Randomized Phase III Study of Pembrolizumab Versus Pembrolizumab-Carboplatin-Pemetrexed for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-small-cell Lung Cancer with PD-L1 50% or more (LAPLACE-50): Study Protocol

BackgroundPembrolizumab monotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitor with platinum and pemetrexed combination chemotherapy are the standard therapies for patients with nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 50%. However, there are no data on the comparative effectiveness of the 2 regimens in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%.Patients and MethodsThis randomized, multicenter, phase III trial (LAPLACE-50, jRCTs031200078) was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab with pembrolizumab-carboplatin-pemetrexed combination in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%. Patients are eligible for enrollment if they are at least 20 years old; have pathologically confirmed locally advanced/metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC without sensitizing epidermal growth factor receptor or anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutations; have not received previous systemic therapy for metastatic disease; have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1; and have at least 1 measurable lesion. Patients will be excluded if they have symptomatic central nervous system metastases, interstitial pneumonitis, active autoimmune disease, or are on systemic immunosuppressive treatment. The patients will be randomized 1:1 to pembrolizumab (200 mg) or pembrolizumab (200 mg) plus carboplatin (area under the curve 5) plus pemetrexed (500 mg/m²) on day 1 of each 21-day treatment cycle. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival. The recruitment phase began in August 2020 and will enroll 290 patients.ConclusionIf the primary endpoint is achieved, pembrolizumab could be the first choice for first-line treatment in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%.     

The immune response‐related mutational signatures and driver genes in non‐small‐cell lung cancer

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy has achieved remarkable clinical benefit in non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but our understanding of biomarkers that predict the response to ICB remain obscure. Here we integrated somatic mutational profile and clinicopathologic information from 113 NSCLC patients treated by ICB (CTLA‐4/PD‐1). High tumor mutation burden (TMB) and neoantigen burden were identified significantly associated with improved efficacy in NSCLC immunotherapy. Furthermore, we identified apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide‐like (APOBEC) mutational signature was markedly associated with responding of ICB therapy (log‐rank test, P = .001; odds ratio (OR), 0.18 [95% CI, 0.06‐0.50], P < .001). The association with progression‐free survival remained statistically significant after controlling for age, sex, histological type, smoking, PD‐L1 expression, hypermutation, smoking signature and mismatch repair (MMR) (HR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.12‐0.75], P = .010). Combined high TMB with APOBEC signature preferably predict immunotherapy responders in NSCLC cohort. The CIBERSORT algorithm revealed that high APOBEC mutational activity samples were associated with increased infiltration of CD4 memory activated T cells, CD8⁺ T cells and natural killer (NK) cells, but reduced infiltration of regulatory T cells. Besides, individual genes mutation of IFNGR1 or VTCN1 were only found in responders; however, the PTEN mutation was only found in non‐responders (Fisher's exact test, all P < .05). These findings may be applicable for guiding immunotherapy for patients with NSCLC.     

Prognostic value of programmed death‐ligand 1 expression in patients with stage III colorectal cancer

The programmed death‐1/programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) pathway is a negative feedback pathway that suppresses the activity of T cells. Previous studies reported that high PD‐L1 expression on tumor cells (TC) was associated with poor survival in patients with colorectal cancer; however, the prognostic evaluation of these studies was limited because they included patients at various disease stages. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between PD‐L1 status in the immune microenvironment and the clinicopathological features of stage III colorectal cancer. Two hundred and thirty‐five patients were included in the analysis. PD‐L1 expression on TC and tumor‐infiltrating mononuclear cells (TIMC) was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. The median follow‐up of thisi study was 52.9 months. A total of 8.1% of stage III colorectal cancer showed high PD‐L1 expression on TC and 15.3% showed high PD‐L1 expression on TIMC. Patients with high PD‐L1 expression on TC had significantly shorter disease‐free survival (DFS) than patients with low expression (hazard ratio [HR] 2.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21–4.62; P = 0.012). In addition, patients with high PD‐L1 expression on TIMC were associated with longer DFS than patients with low expression (HR 0.40; 95% CI, 0.16–0.98; P = 0.046). These findings suggest that PD‐L1 expression status may be a new predictor of recurrence for stage III colorectal cancer patients and highlight the necessity of evaluating PD‐L1 expression on TC and TIMC separately in the tumor microenvironment.     

Survival benefit from S‐1 as compared to Fluorouracil in Asian patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer: A meta‐analysis

Whether S‐1 could replace 5‐Fluorouracil (5‐Fu) or not in the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancer (including advanced gastric cancer [AGS] and metastatic colorectal cancer [mCRC]) in Asian patients has been controversial. This meta‐analysis was performed to compare the activity, efficacy and toxicity of S‐1‐based versus 5‐Fu‐based chemotherapy in those Asian patients. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by electronic search of Pubmed. Relevant abstracts were manually searched to identify relevant trials. A total of 2182 patients from eight RCTs were included, and our results demonstrated that S‐1‐based chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77–1.00) and overall response rate (ORR) (odds ratio [OR], 1.72; 95% CI, 1.09–2.70), but no significant progression‐free survival (PFS) benefit was found between arms (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.72–1.06). Subgroup analyses revealed that S‐1‐based chemotherapy significantly improved OS and ORR in subgroups of patients with non‐platinum containing regimens (P = 0.041; P = 0.034) and patients with no prior chemotherapy history (P = 0.025; P = 0.016). Statistically significant improvements of PFS and ORR in the S‐1‐based chemotherapy were observed in the subgroup of patients with AGC (P < 0.001; P = 0.005). S‐1‐based chemotherapy was characterized by significantly higher incidences of diarrhea, fatigue and thrombocytopenia, and a lower incidence of nausea. This analysis provided strong evidence for survival benefits of S‐1, and S‐1‐based chemotherapy could be considered to replace 5‐Fu‐based therapy for the treatment of advanced GI cancer in Asian patients.