Microsatellite instability and expression of MLH1 and MSH2 in carcinomas of the small intestine

BACKGROUND: Carcinomas of the small intestine are rare, but the risk is greatly increased in patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) due to an inherited mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutation, most commonly affecting the genes MLH1 or MSH2. Defective MMR is characterized by microsatellite instability (MSI) and loss of MMR protein expression in the tumor tissue. However, a subset of several sporadic tumor types, including about 15% of colon cancers, also evolve through defective MMR. METHODS: The authors have assessed the frequency of MSI and analyzed the immunohistochemical expression of MLH1 and MSH2 in a population-based series of 89 adenocarcinomas of the small intestine. To study the contribution of MSI and defective MMR protein expression in young patients, 43 cancers of the small intestine from patients below age 60 years (including 24 tumors from the population-based series and an additional 19 tumors from young individuals) were also analyzed. RESULTS: MSI was detected in 16/89 tumors (18%) in the population-based series, and immunohistochemistry revealed loss of expression for MLH1 in 7/16 MSI tumors and in 2/73 MSS tumors, whereas all tumors showed normal expression for MSH2. Among the young patients, the authors identified MSI in 10/43 tumors (23%), and 6 of these 10 MSI tumors showed immunohistochemical loss of MMR protein expression, which affected MLH1 in 3 cases and MSH2 in 3 cases. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of MSI (18%) in adenocarcinomas of the small intestine equals that of colon cancer. However, silencing of MLH1 seems to explain the MSI status in only about half of the MSI tumors. Among patients with cancer of the small intestine before age 60 years, MSI is found in 23% of the cases, with MLH1 and MSH2 being affected at equal frequencies, indicating that HNPCC may underly a subset of such cases.     

MSH6 germline mutations are rare in colorectal cancer families

Germline mutations in MSH6 can cause HNPCC, which is associated with a tumor phenotype featuring MSI. However, tumors arising in persons with disease-causing mutations of MSH6 may or may not exhibit MSI. We used D-HPLC to screen for germline mutations in the promoter region, the coding region and the 3'-UTR of MSH6. Eighty-four families, enrolled on the basis of Amsterdam I and II criteria (HNPCC families) and less stringent criteria (HNPCC-like families), were tested for MMR gene mutations; 27 families had a disease-causing mutation in MLH1 or MSH2, and the remaining 57 families were tested for mutations in MSH6. Two protein-truncating mutations were identified in each of 2 families fulfilling the Amsterdam I criteria, being present in persons affected with early-onset colorectal cancers exhibiting MSI. Immunohistochemical analysis showed that expression of both MSH2 and MSH6 proteins was lost in the cancer cells of the 2 mutation carriers but only MSH6 protein expression was lost in 2 adenomatous polyps. A third possibly disease-causing mutation was found in a person affected with a tumor that did not exhibit MSI. In addition, we found 4 new polymorphisms and determined that neither of the 2 studied by association analysis conferred susceptibility to colorectal or endometrial cancer. Altogether, our results indicate that disease-causing germline mutations of MSH6 are rare in HNPCC and HNPCC-like families.     

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer in endometrial cancer patients

Endometrial cancer is the second most common cancer in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). It has often been overlooked to explore the possibility of HNPCC in endometrial cancer patients. Our study was to investigate how many HNPCC patients existed among endometrial cancer patients. Among patients who underwent hysterectomy for endometrial cancer at Seoul National University Hospital from 1996 to 2004, 113 patients were included, whose family history and clinical data could be obtained and tumor specimens were available for microsatellite instability (MSI) testing and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 proteins. There were 4 (3.5%) clinical HNPCC patients fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria II, and 2 (2/4, 50%) of them carried MSH2 germline mutations. There were also 8 (7.1%) suspected HNPCC (s-HNPCC) patients fulfilling the revised criteria for s-HNPCC, and one (1/8, 12.5%) of them revealed MLH1 germline mutation. In 101 patients, who were not clinical HNPCC or s-HNPCC, 11 patients showed both MSI-high and loss of expression of MLH1, MSH2 or MSH6 proteins, and 2 (2/11, 18.2%) of them showed MSH6 germline mutations. In 113 patients with endometrial cancer, we could find 5 (4.4%) HNPCC patients with MMR germline mutation and 2 (1.8%) clinical HNPCC patients without identified MMR gene mutation. Family history was critical in detecting 3 HNPCC patients with MMR germline mutation, and MSI testing with IHC staining for MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 proteins was needed in the diagnosis of 2 HNPCC patients who were not clinical HNPCC or s-HNPCC, especially for MSH6 germline mutation.     

Mutations of the 'minor' mismatch repair gene MSH6 in typical and atypical hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

Mutations of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1 and MSH2 are associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), a highly penetrant autosomal dominant condition characterized by hypermutability of short tandemly repeated sequences in tumor DNA. Mutations of another MMR gene, MSH6, seem to be less common than MLH1 and MSH2 defects, and have been mostly observed in atypical HNPCC families, characterized by a weaker tumor family history, higher age at disease onset, and low degrees of microsatellite instability (MSI), predominantly involving mononucleotide runs. We have investigated the MSH6 gene sequence in the peripheral blood of 4 HNPCC and 20 atypical HNPCC probands. Two frameshift mutations within exon 4 were detected in 2 patients. One mutation was found in a proband from a typical HNPCC family, who had developed a colorectal cancer (CRC), a gastric cancer and a rectal adenoma. The CRC and the adenoma showed mild MSI limited to mononucleotide tracts, while the gastric carcinoma was microsatellite stable. The other mutation was detected in an atypical HNPCC proband, whose CRC showed widespread MSI involving both mono- and dinucleotide repeats. The phenotypic variability associated with MSH6 constitutional mutations represents a complicating factor for the optimization of strategies aimed at identifying candidates to MSH6 genetic testing.     

MSH2 mutation carriers are at higher risk of cancer than MLH1 mutation carriers: a study of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer families.

PURPOSE: Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is an autosomal dominant disease characterized by the clustering of colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer, and various other cancers. The disease is caused by mutations in DNA-mismatch-repair (MMR) genes, most frequently in MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6. The aims of the present study were to compare the risk of developing colorectal, endometrial, and other cancers between families with the various MMR-gene mutations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical and pathologic data were collected from 138 families with HNPCC. Mutation analyses were performed for all families. Survival analysis was used to calculate the cumulative risk of developing cancer in the various subsets of relatives. RESULTS: Mutations were identified in 79 families: 34 in MLH1, 40 in MSH2, and five in MSH6. The lifetime risk of developing cancer at any site was significantly higher for MSH2 mutation carriers than for MLH1 mutation carriers (P < .01). The risk of developing colorectal or endometrial cancer was higher in MSH2 mutation carriers than in MLH1 mutation carriers, but the difference was not significant (P = .13 and P = .057, respectively). MSH2 mutation carriers were found to have a significantly higher risk of developing cancer of the urinary tract (P < .05). The risk of developing cancer of the ovaries, stomach, and brain was also higher in the MSH2 mutation carriers than in the MLH1 mutation carriers, but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Pending large prospective studies, the extension of the current surveillance program in MSH2 mutation carriers with the inclusion of the urinary tract should be considered.     

Very low prevalence of germline MSH6 mutations in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer suspected patients with colorectal cancer without microsatellite instability

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is caused by mutations in one of the mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2 and results in high-level microsatellite instability (MSI-high) in tumours of HNPCC patients. The MSI test is considered reliable for indicating mutations in MLH1 and MSH2, but is questioned for MSH6. Germline mutation analysis was performed in 19 patients with an MSI-high tumour and absence of MSH2 and/or MSH6 protein as determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC), without an MLH1 or MSH2 mutation, and in 76 out of 295 patients suspected of HNPCC, with a non-MSI-high colorectal cancer (CRC). All 295 non-MSI-high CRCs were analysed for presence of MSH6 protein by IHC. In 10 patients with an MSI-high tumour without MSH2 and/or MSH6 expression, a pathogenic MSH6 mutation was detected, whereas no pathogenic MSH6 mutation was detected in 76 patients with a non-MSI-high CRC and normal MSH6 protein expression. In none of the 295 CRCs loss of MSH6 protein expression was detected. The prevalence of a germline MSH6 mutation is very low in HNPCC suspected patients with non-MSI-high CRC. Microsatellite instability analysis in CRCs is highly sensitive to select patients for MSH6 germline mutation analysis.     

Use of molecular tumor characteristics to prioritize mismatch repair gene testing in early-onset colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The relationships between mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression, microsatellite instability (MSI), family history, and germline MMR gene mutation status have not been studied on a population basis. METHODS: We studied 131 unselected patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed younger than age 45 years. For the 105 available tumors, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 protein expression using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and MSI were measured. Germline DNA was screened for hMLH1, hMSH2, hMSH6, and hPMS2 mutations for the following patients: all from families fulfilling the Amsterdam Criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC); all with tumors that were high MSI, low MSI, or that lacked expression of any MMR protein; and a random sample of 23 with MS-stable tumors expressing all MMR proteins. RESULTS: Germline mutations were found in 18 patients (nine hMLH1, four hMSH2, four hMSH6, and one hPMS2); all tumors exhibited loss of MMR protein expression, all but one were high MSI or low MSI, and nine were from a family fulfilling Amsterdam Criteria. Sensitivities of IHC testing, MSI (high or low), and Amsterdam Criteria for MMR gene mutation were 100%, 94%, and 50%, respectively. Corresponding positive predictive values were 69%, 50%, and 75%. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor IHC analysis of four MMR proteins and MSI testing provide a highly sensitive strategy for identifying MMR gene mutation-carrying, early-onset colorectal cancer patients, half of whom would have been missed using Amsterdam Criteria alone. Tumor-based approaches for triaging early-onset colorectal cancer patients for MMR gene mutation testing, irrespective of family history, appear to be an efficient screening strategy for HNPCC.     

Mutations of the 'minor' mismatch repair gene MSH6 in typical and atypical hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

Mutations of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1 and MSH2 are associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), a highly penetrant autosomal dominant condition characterized by hypermutability of short tandemly repeated sequences in tumor DNA. Mutations of another MMR gene, MSH6, seem to be less common than MLH1 and MSH2 defects, and have been mostly observed in atypical HNPCC families, characterized by a weaker tumor family history, higher age at disease onset, and low degrees of microsatellite instability (MSI), predominantly involving mononucleotide runs. We have investigated the MSH6 gene sequence in the peripheral blood of 4 HNPCC and 20 atypical HNPCC probands. Two frameshift mutations within exon 4 were detected in 2 patients. One mutation was found in a proband from a typical HNPCC family, who had developed a colorectal cancer (CRC), a gastric cancer and a rectal adenoma. The CRC and the adenoma showed mild MSI limited to mononucleotide tracts, while the gastric carcinoma was microsatellite stable. The other mutation was detected in an atypical HNPCC proband, whose CRC showed widespread MSI involving both mono- and dinucleotide repeats. The phenotypic variability associated with MSH6 constitutional mutations represents a complicating factor for the optimization of strategies aimed at identifying candidates to MSH6 genetic testing.     

Microsatellite instability markers for identifying early-onset colorectal cancers caused by germ-line mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes.

PURPOSE: Microsatellite instability (MSI) testing of colorectal cancer tumors is used as a screening tool to identify patients most likely to be mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutation carriers. We wanted to examine which microsatellite markers currently used to detect MSI best predict early-onset colorectal cancer caused by germ-line mutations in MMR genes. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Invasive primary tumors from a population-based sample of 107 cases of colorectal cancer diagnosed before age 45 years and tested for germ-line mutations in MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 and MMR protein expression were screened for MSI using the National Cancer Institute panel and an expanded 10-microsatellite marker panel. RESULTS: The National Cancer Institute five-marker panel system scored 31 (29%) as (NCI)MSI-High, 13 (12%) as (NCI)MSI-Low, and 63 (59%) as (NCI)MS-Stable. The 10-marker panel classified 18 (17%) as (10)MSI-High, 17 (16%) as (10)MSI-Low, and 72 (67%) as (10)MS-Stable. Of the 26 cancers that lacked the expression of at least one MMR gene, 24 (92%) were positive for some level of MSI (using either microsatellite panel). The mononucleotide repeats Bat26, Bat40, and Myb were unstable in all (10)MSI-High cancers and all MLH1 and MSH2 mutation carriers (100% sensitive). Bat40 and Bat25 were unstable in all tumors of MSH6 mutation carriers (100% sensitive). Bat40 was unstable in all MMR gene mutation carriers (100% sensitive). By incorporating seven mononucleotide repeats markers into the 10-marker panel, we were able to distinguish the carriers of MSH6 mutations (all scored (10)MSI-Low) from the MLH1 and MSH2 mutation carriers (all scored (10)MSI-High). CONCLUSIONS: In early-onset colorectal cancer, a microsatellite panel containing a high proportion of mononuclear repeats can distinguish between tumors caused by MLH1 and MSH2 mutations from those caused by MSH6 mutations.     

Defective mismatch-repair in patients with multiple primary tumours including colorectal cancer

Individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer development are at an increased risk of developing multiple tumours. Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is one of the most common hereditary cancer syndromes and is estimated to account for approximately 2% of colorectal cancers. However, HNPCC individuals are at an increased risk of developing other tumour types such as cancers of the endometrium, urothelium and small intestine. We have utilised a population-based regional cancer registry to identify all patients with double primary colorectal cancers and at least one additional malignancy and characterised the tumour spectrum in this patient group. We subsequently selected those 47 individuals who had developed at least four malignancies, including two colorectal cancers, for studies of the tumour characteristics associated with HNPCC. In total, these individuals developed 209 tumours, 156 of which were successfully retrieved. Microsatellite instability (MSI), a phenomenon caused by defective mismatch-repair (MMR), was identified in 63/154 (41%) evaluable tumours with a MSI-high pattern in 59 and a MSI-low pattern in four tumours. All tumours were immunohistochemically stained for the MMR proteins MLH1 and MSH2, with loss of expression in 55/63 (87%) MSI tumours and in 2/89 (2%) microsatellite stable (MSS) tumours. This loss affected MLH1 in 24 tumours and MSH2 in 33 tumours. A concordant loss of expression for the same MMR protein in several tumours from the same individual, a pattern that strongly suggests an underlying germline MMR gene mutation, was found in 17/45 (38%) patients and affected MLH1 in 8 patients and MSH2 in 9 patients. We conclude that the development of multiple primary tumours, including synchronous or metachronous colorectal cancers, is associated with an increased frequency of MSI and loss of immunohistochemical expression of MLH1 and MSH2.     

The role of MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 in the development of multiple colorectal cancers

There is increased incidence of microsatellite instability (MSI) in patients who develop multiple primary colorectal cancers (CRC), although the association with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) is unclear. This study aims to evaluate the underlying genetic cause of MSI in these patients. Microsatellite instability was investigated in 111 paraffin-embedded CRCs obtained from 78 patients with metachronous and synchronous cancers, and a control group consisting of 74 cancers from patients with a single CRC. Tumours were classified as high level (MSI-H), low level (MSI-L) or stable (MSS). MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 gene expression was measured by immunohistochemistry. Methylation of the MLH1 promoter region was evaluated in MSI-H cancers that failed to express MLH1, and mutational analysis performed in MSI-H samples that expressed MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 proteins. The frequency of MSI-H was significantly greater in the multiple, 58 out of 111 (52%), compared to the single cancers, 10 out of 74 (13.5%), P < 0.01. Of the 32 patients from whom two or more cancers were analysed, eight (25%) demonstrated MSI-H in both cancers, 13 (41%) demonstrated MSI-H in one cancer and 11 (34%) failed to demonstrate any MSI-H. MSI-H single cancers failed to express MLH1 or MSH2 in seven out of nine (78%) cases and MSI-L/MSS cancers failed to express MLH1 or MSH2 in one out of 45 (2.2%) cases, all cancers expressed MSH6. MSI-H multiple cancers failed to express MLH1 or MSH2 in 21 out of 43 (48%) cases and MSI-L/MSS cancers failed to express MLH1 or MSH2 in four out of 32 (12.5%) cases. MSH6 expression was lost in five MSI-H multiple cancers, four of which also failed to express MLH1 or MSH2. Loss of expression of the same mismatch repair (MMR) gene was identified in both cancers from six out of 19 (31%) patients. Methylation was identified in 11 out of 17 (65%) multiple and three out of six (50%) single MSI-H cancers that failed to express MLH1. Mutational analysis of 10 MSI-H multiple cancers that expressed MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 failed to demonstrate mutations in the MLH1 or MSH2 genes. We suggest that, although MSI-H is more commonly identified in those with multiple colorectal cancers, this does not commonly arise from a classical HNPCC pathway.     

Toward new strategies to select young endometrial cancer patients for mismatch repair gene mutation analysis.

PURPOSE: To determine the frequency of mismatch repair (MMR) gene germline mutations in endometrial cancer patients who were diagnosed at less than 50 years of age; to relate the presence of mutations to family history, histopathologic data, presence of tumor microsatellite instability (MSI), and immunostaining; and to formulate criteria for genetic testing in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Endometrial cancer patients (N = 58), who were diagnosed at less than 50 years of age, were included and questioned about their family history. Mutation analysis of the MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 genes was performed (denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and sequence analysis to detect small mutations and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification to detect large deletions or duplications). For MSI analysis, five consensus markers were used, and immunostaining of the three MMR proteins was performed. RESULTS: In five of 22 patients with a positive first-degree family history for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)-related cancers, pathogenic germline mutations were found (one MLH1, three MSH2, and one MSH6). Four mutation carriers belonged to families fulfilling the revised Amsterdam criteria. No mutations were found in the 35 patients without such family history (P =.006). MSI was detected in 20 of 57 cancers, among which four were from mutation carriers. In 23 of 51 cancers, one or more MMR protein was absent; in all five mutation carriers, immunostaining indicated the involved MMR gene. CONCLUSION: In 23% of the young endometrial cancer patients with at least one first-degree relative with an HNPCC-related cancer, an MMR gene mutation was detected. Therefore, presence of an HNPCC-related cancer in a first-degree relative seems to be an important selection criterion for mutation analysis. Subsequent immunostaining of MMR proteins will point to the gene(s) that should be analyzed.     

MLH1 and MSH2 protein expression as a pre-screening marker in hereditary and non-hereditary endometrial hyperplasia and cancer

The predictive value of MLH1 or MSH2 protein expression for the presence of truncating germline mutations was examined in benign and (pre)malignant endometrial samples from 3 patient groups: (I) 10 endometrial cancer patients from hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) families with (n = 6) or without (n = 4) a known germline mutation; (II) 15 women from HNPCC families with (n = 7) or without (n = 8) a known germline mutation, who underwent endometrial sampling for non-malignant reasons; (III) 38 endometrial cancer patients <50 years of age, without HNPCC family history. Immunostaining for MLH1 and MSH2 was performed on paraffin-embedded sections. In group III, tumor DNA was examined for microsatellite instability (MSI) and MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 mutation analysis was carried out. In 6/6 MLH1/MSH2 mutation carriers with endometrial cancer (group I), concordance was found between protein loss in the tumor and the corresponding mutation. In 3 MLH1 mutation carriers, MLH1 protein loss was also observed in concurrent endometrial hyperplasia. In group II, no protein loss was detected in normal endometrial tissue samples; in 3/4 patients with endometrial hyperplasia, MLH1/MSH2 protein loss was observed. In group III, protein loss was detected in 12/38 patients (9 MLH1, 3 MSH2), while in 3/11 patients with concurrent endometrial hyperplasia protein loss was also observed in the hyperplasia. MSI analysis in group III revealed 26 MSI-low and 12 MSI-high tumors. Mutation analysis in 28/38 patients showed only 1 missense MSH6 and no MLH1 or MSH2 germline mutations. In group III, loss of MLH1/MSH2 protein expression was not related to the presence of MSI or MLH1/MSH2 germline mutations. In conclusion, MLH1 or MSH2 protein loss in HNPCC-related endometrial neoplasia is strongly related to corresponding germline mutations. This relation was not clearly present in young sporadic endometrial cancer patients. Immunohistochemical pre-screening of the MLH1 and MSH2 proteins in endometrial hyperplasia or cancer can thus be helpful in HNPCC families. Frequent loss of MLH1 or MSH2 protein in endometrial hyperplasia indicates that this loss is an early event in endometrial carcinogenesis.     

Genomic rearrangements in MSH2, MLH1 or MSH6 are rare in HNPCC patients carrying point mutations

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is an autosomal dominant disease with high penetrance, caused by germline mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 and MLH3. Most reported pathogenic mutations are point mutations, comprising single base substitutions, small insertions and deletions. In addition, genomic rearrangements, such as large deletions and duplications not detectable by PCR and Sanger sequencing, have been identified in a significant proportion of HNPCC families, which do not carry a pathogenic MMR gene point mutation. To clarify whether genomic rearrangements in MLH1, MSH2 or MSH6 also occur in patients carrying a point mutation, we subjected normal tissue DNA of 137 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients to multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) analysis. Patients fulfilled the following pre-requisites: all patients met at least one criterion of the Bethesda guidelines and their tumors exhibited high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and/or showed loss of expression of MLH1, MSH2 or MSH6 proteins. PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing of all exons of at least one MMR gene, whose protein expression had been lost in the tumor tissue, identified 52 index patients without a point mutation (Group 1), 71 index patients with a pathogenic point mutation in MLH1 (n=38) or MSH2 (n=22) or MSH6 (n=11) (Group 2) and 14 patients with an unclassified variant in MLH1 (n=9) or MSH2 (n=3) or MSH6 (n=2) (Group 3). In 13 of 52 patients of group 1 deletions of at least one exon were identified. In addition, in group 3 one EX1_15del in MLH1 was found. No genomic rearrangement was identified in group 2 patients. Genomic rearrangements represent a significant proportion of pathogenic mutations of MMR genes in HNPCC patients. However, genomic rearrangements are rare in patients carrying point mutations in MMR genes. These findings suggest the use of genomic rearrangement tests in addition to Sanger sequencing in HNPCC patients.     

Lower incidence of colorectal cancer and later age of disease onset in 27 families with pathogenic MSH6 germline mutations compared with families with MLH1 or MSH2 mutations: the German Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Consortium.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was the analysis of the involvement and phenotypic manifestations of MSH6 germline mutations in families suspected of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were preselected among 706 families by microsatellite instability, immunohistochemistry, and/or exclusion of MLH1 or MSH2 mutations and were subjected to MSH6 mutation analysis. Clinical and molecular data of MSH6 mutation families were compared with data from families with MLH1 and MSH2 mutations. RESULTS: We identified 27 families with 24 different pathogenic MSH6 germline mutations, representing 3.8% of the total of the families, and 14.7% of all families with DNA mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations (n = 183). The median age of onset of colorectal cancer in putative mutation carriers was 10 years higher for MSH6 (54 years; 95% CI, 51 to 56) compared with MLH1 and MSH2 (44 years; 95% CI, 43 to 45; log-rank test, P = .0038). Relative to other malignant tumors, colorectal cancer was less frequent in MSH6 families compared with MLH1 and MSH2 families (Fisher's exact test, P < .001). In contrast, the frequency of non-HNPCC-associated tumors was increased (Fisher's exact test, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Later age of disease onset and lower incidence of colorectal cancer may contribute to a lower proportion of identified MSH6 mutations in families suspected of HNPCC. However, in approximately half of these families, at least one patient developed colorectal or endometrial cancer in the fourth decade of life. Therefore, a surveillance program as stringent as that for families with MLH1 or MSH2 mutations is recommended.     

The added value of PMS2 immunostaining in the diagnosis of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

Identification and characterization of the genetic background in patients with the hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) syndrome is important since control programmes can in a cost-effective manner prevent cancer development in high-risk individuals. HNPCC is caused by germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations and the genetic analysis of HNPCC therefore includes assessment of microsatellite instability (MSI) and immunohistochemical MMR protein expression in the tumor tissue. MSI is found in >95% of the HNPCC-associated tumors and immunostaining using antibodies against the MMR proteins MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 has been found to correctly pinpoint the affected gene in about 90% of the cases. The PMS2 antibody was the most recently developed and we have in a clinical material assessed the added value of PMS2 immunostaining in 213 patients with suspected hereditary colorectal cancer. All 119 MSS tumors showed retained expression for all four antibodies and PMS2 did thus not identify any underlying MMR defect in these cases. However, PMS2 immunostaining contributed to the characterization of the MMR defect in a subset of the MSI tumors. Concomitant loss of MLH1 and PMS2, which functionally interact in the MutLα complex, was found in 98% of the tumors from patients with germline MLH1 mutations. Among the 12 MSI-high tumors with retained expression of MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6, 8 tumors showed loss of PMS2 staining, and mutations in MLH1 were identified in 2 and mutations in PMS2 in 3 of these individuals. In summary, isolated loss of PMS2 was found in 8% of the MSI-high tumors in our series, including 8/12 previously unexplained MSI-high tumors, in which mutations either in MLH1 or in PMS2 were identified in five cases.     

Prediction of the outcome of genetic testing in HNPCC kindreds using the revised Amsterdam criteria and immunohistochemistry

Background and aims: Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) may be caused by mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1, MSH2 or MSH6. Family history (Amsterdam criteria) has traditionally been used to select patients for mutation testing. It has been demonstrated that germline mutations in the MMR genes are associated with lack of the corresponding gene product as assessed with immunohistochemistry (IHC) in tumour specimens. The aim of the study was to assess the value of the Amsterdam criteria II and IHC in predicting germline mutations. Methods: Fifty-six families that were previously tested for MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 mutations were selected for this study. All pedigrees were extended and verified and the families were scored according to the original (I) and the revised Amsterdam criteria (II). The probabilities for MLH1 and MSH2 mutations were calculated by logistic regression. In addition, all available tumour material from indexed family members was examined by IHC for the presence of the three gene products. Results: Three out of seven (39%) families where the mutation could be identified complied with the Amsterdam criteria I, while all seven (100%) met the Amsterdam criteria II. All families carrying a MLH1 or MSH2 mutation had > 15% calculated probability of finding a mutation. Tumours from all seven mutation carriers lacked the immunohistochemical expression of the corresponding MMR gene. Conclusion: The results indicate that the Amsterdam criteria II in combination with immunohistochemistry of the mismatch repair proteins in tumours may be a cost-effective approach to select families for mutation analysis.     

BRAF-V600E is not involved in the colorectal tumorigenesis of HNPCC in patients with functional MLH1 and MSH2 genes

Recently, it was shown that the oncogenic activation of BRAF, a member of the RAS/RAF family of kinases, by the V600E mutation is characteristic for sporadic colon tumors with microsatellite instability. Further, it was shown to associate with the silencing of the mismatch repair (MMR) gene MLH1 by hypermethylation. Moreover, BRAF mutations proved to be absent in tumors from hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (HNPCC) families with germline mutations in the MMR genes MLH1 and MSH2. These data suggest that the oncogenic activation of BRAF is involved only in sporadic colorectal tumorigenesis. In order to further support this hypothesis, we have extended the analysis of the BRAF gene to a different subset of HNPCC families without germline mutations in MLH1 and MSH2. BRAF-V600E mutations were analysed by automatic sequencing in 38 tumors from HNPCC families with germline mutations in the MSH6 gene and also in HNPCC (suspected) families that do not have mutations in the MMR genes MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6. All patients belong to different families. No mutations were detected in 14 tumors from HNPCC patients with germline mutations in MSH6. Further, no mutations of BRAF were found in tumors from 23 MMR-negative families, from which 13 fulfilled the Amsterdam criteria (HNPCC) and 10 were suspected for HNPCC as they were positive for the Bethesda criteria. Overall, our data reinforce the concept that BRAF is not involved in the colorectal tumorigenesis of HNPCC. The detection of a positive BRAF-V600E mutation in a colorectal cancer suggests a sporadic origin of the disease and the absence of germline alterations of MLH1, MSH2 and also of MSH6. These findings have a potential impact in the genetic testing for HNPCC diagnostics and suggest a potential use of BRAF as exclusion criteria for HNPCC or as a molecular marker of sporadic cancer.     

Relationship between MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 and MSH6 gene-specific alterations and tumor mutational burden in 1057 microsatellite instability-high solid tumors

Microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) are predictive biomarkers for immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Still, the relationship between the underlying cause(s) of MSI and TMB in tumors remains poorly defined. We investigated associations of TMB to mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression patterns by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and MMR mutations in a diverse sample of tumors. Hypothesized differences were identified by the protein/gene affected/mutated and the tumor histology/primary site. Overall, 1057 MSI-H tumors were identified from the 32 932 tested. MSI was examined by NGS using 7000+ target microsatellite loci. TMB was calculated using only nonsynonymous missense mutations sequenced with a 592-gene panel; a subset of MSI-H tumors also had MMR IHC performed. Analyses examined TMB by MMR protein heterodimer impacted (loss of MLH1/PMS2 vs. MSH2/MSH6 expression) and gene-specific mutations. The sample was 54.6% female; mean age was 63.5 years. Among IHC tested tumors, loss of co-expression of MLH1/PMS2 was more common (n = 544/705, 77.2%) than loss of MSH2/MSH6 (n = 81/705, 11.5%; P < .0001), and was associated with lower mean TMB (MLH1/PMS2: 25.03 mut/Mb vs MSH2/MSH6 46.83 mut/Mb; P < .0001). TMB also varied by tumor histology: colorectal cancers demonstrating MLH1/PMS2 loss had higher TMBs (33.14 mut/Mb) than endometrial cancers (20.60 mut/Mb) and other tumors (25.59 mut/Mb; P < .0001). MMR gene mutations were detected in 42.0% of tumors; among these, MSH6 mutations were most common (25.7%). MSH6 mutation patterns showed variability by tumor histology and TMB. TMB varies by underlying cause(s) of MSI and tumor histology; this heterogeneity may contribute to differences in response to ICI.     

Altered expression of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 in predisposition to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: A considerable fraction (30% to 70%) of families with verified or putative hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer fails to show mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Our purpose was to address the genetic etiology of such families. Materials and METHODS: We scrutinized a population-based cohort of 26 families from Finland that had screened mutation-negative by previous techniques. Blood was tested for allelic messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 by single nucleotide primer extension (SNuPE), and tumor tissue for MMR protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) as well as for microsatellite instability (MSI). Full-length cDNAs of genes implicated by SNuPE or IHC were cloned and sequenced. RESULTS: Unbalanced mRNA expression of MLH1 alleles was evident in two families. An inherited nonsense mutation was subsequently identified in one family, and complete silencing of the mutated allele was identified in the other family. Extinct protein expression by IHC implicated MLH1 in these two and in four other families, MSH2 in four families, and MSH6 in one family. Although no unequivocal genomic mutations were detected in the latter families, haplotype and other findings provided support for heritable defects. With one exception, all tumors with IHC alterations showed MSI, in contrast to the remaining families, which showed neither IHC changes nor MSI. CONCLUSION: Our expression-based strategy stratified the present "mutation-negative" cohort into two discrete categories: families linked to the major MMR genes MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 (11 [42%] of 26) and those likely to be associated with other, as yet unknown susceptibility genes (15 [58%] of 26).