Antiplatelet drugs in cardiovascular prevention: stroke: acute phase and secondary prevention

(1) In the acute phase of ischaemic stroke in patients free of thrombogenic heart disease, combined treatment with aspirin + moderate-dose unfractionated heparin reduces the risk of relapse and death. Unfractionated heparin at higher anticoagulant doses has an unfavourable risk-benefit ratio. Treatment is controversial in patients with events associated with atrial fibrillation. (2) After ischaemic stroke in patients free of thrombogenic heart disease, aspirin reduces the risk of relapse and death. Other antiplatelet drugs, the aspirin + dipyridamole combination, ticlopidine and clopidogrel have similar efficacy to aspirin. (3) The risk-benefit ratio of oral anticoagulant is favourable after ischaemic stroke associated with atrial fibrillation; but it is unfavourable after stroke without thrombogenic heart disease.     

Antiplatelet drugs in cardiovascular prevention: coronary events: acute phase and secondary prevention

(1) Aspirin reduces acute-phase mortality after myocardial infarction, and also reduces the risk of myocardial infarction and death in patients with unstable angina. Aspirin reduces the risk of myocardial infarction in patients with stable angina and after unstable angina, and the risk of relapse after myocardial infarction. It reduces the risk of complications during coronary angioplasty, and the risk of venous coronary bypass graft occlusion after coronary surgery. (2) The best risk-benefit ratio with aspirin is achieved at a daily dose of 75-350 mg; 160 mg/day is the best-validated dose in the acute phase of myocardial infarction. (3) Aspirin must be combined with a thrombolytic agent in patients with myocardial infarction, and with heparin in patients with unstable angina. During coronary stenting the aspirin + clopidogrel combination may have a better risk-benefit ratio than the aspirin + ticlopidine combination. (4) Clopidogrel can be used when aspirin is contraindicated or poorly tolerated. (5) Oral anticoagulants seem a better option than aspirin after complicated myocardial infarction.     

Limiting neurological damage after stroke: a review of pharmacological treatment options

Acute ischaemic stroke is a leading cause of death and a major cause of long term disability worldwide. Effective treatments for limiting the neurological damage after stroke have proven elusive. An improved understanding of the complicated cascade of cellular events following the onset of cerebral ischaemia has led to exploration of a number of avenues for early intervention. Reperfusion of the ischaemic territory using thrombolytic drugs has shown promise in clinical trials as a method for achieving tissue salvage. Antithrombotic and antiplatelet agents have not demonstrated efficacy as acute therapies, although the early use of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) appears to produce a reduction in early stroke recurrence. A wide variety of drugs which interfere at various points in the ischaemic cascade, so-called 'neuroprotective agents', have also been studied, but with mixed success. Of these, antagonists of voltage-gated calcium channels, antagonists at the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor and scavengers of free radicals have been most extensively studied. Despite proving effective in animal models of cerebral ischaemia, these drugs have largely failed to fulfil their promise in clinical trials. While individual compounds have proven ineffective, combinations of drugs with different mechanisms of action may yet provide the best treatment for acute ischaemic stroke.     

Aspirin and primary cardiovascular prevention. Uncertain balance between benefits and risks

Most individuals with no pre-existing cardiovascular disease have a low risk of experiencing arterial thrombosis. Using the standard Prescrire methodology, we reviewed the literature on the risk-benefit balance of aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular events. In the general population, a meta-analysis in 95 456 persons suggests that aspirin has no effect on either total or cardiovascular mortality. Aspirin may slightly reduce the risk of stroke in women and myocardial infarction in men, but it increases the risk of bleeding. It is unclear whether the benefits outweigh the risks. Aspirin does not reduce mortality in the elderly. in one trial, aspirin reduced the risk of ischaemic stroke and myocardial infarction in women aged 65 and over. However, the risk of cerebral haemorrhage associated with aspirin increases with age. Therefore, the risk-benefit balance of aspirin in primary cardiovascular prevention in the elderly is uncertain. Aspirin is more beneficial in patients with cardiovascular risk factors, but the bleeding risk is sometimes higher too. In clinical trials, aspirin did not reduce either total or cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive or diabetic patients. In contrast, it reduced the risk of myocardial infarction in hypertensive patients and diabetic men. Aspirin did not prevent cardiovascular events in smokers, and has not been assessed in patients with hypercholesterolaemia. In practice, the risks outweigh the benefits when aspirin is used to prevent a first thrombotic event in people at low risk. When the cardiovascular risk is higher than in the general population, for example in patients with risk factors, the weak preventive effects of aspirin on myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke may outweigh the small extra risk of bleeding. The possible value of aspirin for cardiovascular prevention should be discussed with each individual patient. In general, it is preferable to recommend measures with a proven impact on mortality, such as dietary changes, smoking cessation, or drug therapy for patients with risk factors.     

Novel thrombolytic drugs: will they make a difference in the treatment of ischaemic stroke?

Treatment of acute ischaemic stroke aims to recanalize the occluded artery, salvage the at-risk brain tissue and thus minimize neurological sequelae. Efforts a decade ago have led to the only currently approved medical treatment for acute ischaemic stroke, i.e. intravenous alteplase given within 3 hours of stroke onset. Recanalization occurs in only one-half of the patients receiving alteplase, and only approximately 5% of all ischaemic stroke patients in industrialized countries receive this treatment. Studies are currently being carried out to determine whether intravenous alteplase would be safe and effective for up to 4.5 hours after ischaemic stroke onset, and whether it should be followed by an intra-arterial approach. Two novel thrombolytic drugs being studied for acute ischaemic stroke are desmoteplase and tenecteplase. Although the first trials were promising, the most recent evidence suggests that desmoteplase is not superior to placebo, even in carefully selected patients, in the 3- to 9-hour time window after stroke onset. Tenecteplase has only been studied for acute ischaemic stroke in a single noncontrolled, dose-finding trial in the 3-hour time window after stroke onset, which suggested a similar efficacy to that demonstrated in the historical data from the alteplase trials. A trial to compare the safety and efficacy of tenecteplase versus alteplase is ongoing. Safer and more effective thrombolytic drugs for the treatment of ischaemic stroke are thus being sought. Such agents will be welcome, but they are not here yet. While waiting we are likely to see the emergence of additive therapies, including ultrasound insonation, neuroprotective/regenerative agents and invasive intra-arterial techniques. Novel thrombolytic drugs, or other novel therapies, possess great potential to make a difference in the future, but the most urgent priority now is in the organization of stroke treatment in such a way that more patients receive the currently available optimal treatments.     

Aspirin and heparin in acute ischaemic stroke in older patients.

Over four-fifths of all strokes are due to thrombotic or embolic occlusion of cerebral arteries. There is a strong rationale for considering antithrombotic therapy for the treatment of patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Antiplatelet therapy with 150 to 300 mg of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) started within the first 48 hours of an ischaemic stroke improves patient outcome in the short and long term, with a low risk of adverse effects. Anticoagulants such as heparin may reduce the risk of developing deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in patients with stroke, but randomised controlled trials have demonstrated a significant and dose-dependent risk of intracranial haemorrhage. The routine use of parenteral anticoagulants, including unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparins and heparinoids in the acute phase of ischaemic stroke is not associated with any net short or long term benefit. Aspirin is, therefore, the antithrombotic drug of choice in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke.     

Intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke: optimising its use in routine clinical practice

Stroke is a common and important medical problem. Intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator; rtPA) is the only available direct treatment that reduces neurological injury following ischaemic stroke. Strong efficacy data from randomised, controlled trials support the use of intravenous thrombolysis to improve outcomes for patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Numerous studies have provided effectiveness data that demonstrate that intravenous thrombolytic therapy can be given safely outside clinical trial settings. However, effectiveness studies have demonstrated that intravenous thrombolytic therapy is often given despite protocol violations when it is prescribed in routine clinical practice. Protocol violations must be avoided because they are associated with adverse events including higher mortality and increased haemorrhagic complications. Although thrombolytic therapy with alteplase is currently being used in only <10% of patients with acute ischaemic stroke, recent studies demonstrate that quality management efforts can improve both the absolute rate of use as well as the proficiency with which alteplase is administered. Given the complexities inherent in prescribing thrombolysis for patients with acute ischaemic stroke, alteplase should be used by clinicians who are experienced in the diagnosis and management of stroke, working in medical centres that have systems in place to ensure that alteplase is given without protocol violations.     

Pharmacological approaches to acute ischaemic stroke: reperfusion certainly, neuroprotection possibly

Stroke is a major cause of both death and disability. However, there are no pharmacological treatments used in most countries other than recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, a thrombolytic, and this is only used in about 4% of patients presenting after an acute ischaemic stroke. One novel thrombolytic (desmoteplase) has just been reported to have failed in a Phase IIb/III trial, but other thrombolytics and reperfusion agents remain in development. The picture with neuroprotectant agents, that is compounds that act to preserve neurones following an acute cerebral ischaemic insult, is even more bleak. Despite the development of over 1,000 compounds, many proving effective in animal models of stroke, none has demonstrated efficacy in patients in the over 100 clinical trials conducted. This includes NXY-059, which was developed in accordance with the guidelines proposed by an academic-industry roundtable group (STAIR). This review examines the available data on compounds currently in development. It also proposes that the failure of translation between efficacy in preclinical models and patients is likely to terminate most current neuroprotective drug development. It is suggested that animal models must be made more representative of the patient condition (with other co-morbid conditions) and suggests that since stroke is primarily a cardiovascular disease with a neurological outcome, more research on the neurovascular unit would be valuable. New approaches on neuroinflammation, neurorestoration and neurorepair are also likely to gain prominence in the search for new drugs to treat this major clinical problem.     

Alteplase: new indication. Inadequately assessed in ischaemic stroke

(1) Alteplase is the first thrombolytic drug to be approved in France for the treatment of ischaemic stroke within three hours of symptom onset. (2) The clinical evaluation dossier contains nine placebo-controlled trials, of which six were relatively large. In the two NINDS trials (624 patients in total), treatment was started within the first three hours and it showed no survival benefit. Near-complete functional recovery was more frequent in the alteplase group than in the placebo group. In the two ECASS trials (620 and 800 patients) and the ATLANTIS trials (142 patients and 613 patients), treatment was started within the first six hours and it showed no significant benefit in terms of survival or functional recovery. (3) There are two meta-analyses of these trials. They confirm the lack of a survival benefit with alteplase. Using a combined endpoint, one meta-analysis showed that treating 1000 patients with alteplase prevented death or major disability (dependency) in 55 patients. The other meta-analysis underlined the importance of a short interval between the onset of symptoms and the beginning of treatment. (4) Intracranial haemorrhage is the most important adverse effect. One meta-analysis showed that alteplase caused 62 additional symptomatic intracranial haemorrhages (including 25 deaths) per 1000 treated patients. (5) Various retrospective subgroup analyses have tentatively identified subgroups of patients at a particularly high risk of adverse effects, but subgroup analyses provide only weak evidence. The patients most likely to benefit from alteplase, started within three hours of symptom onset, remain to be defined. (6) The current health infrastructure in France would allow only a small number of stroke patients to be treated with alteplase under the kind of conditions prevailing in clinical trials (imaging to confirm ischaemic stroke, and treatment very soon after the onset of symptoms). (7) In practice, there is a narrow margin between the wanted and unwanted effects of alteplase. This treatment should be used only by specialised teams and for strictly selected patients. Research must continue, particularly to identify those patients most likely to benefit from alteplase, and those most likely to be harmed in whom thrombolysis is contraindicated.     

Acute ischaemic stroke in patients aged 80 years and older: focus on the tolerability of thrombolytic agents

Ischaemic stroke is a devastating disease in the elderly with 30-50% 90-day mortality. Thrombolysis for stroke is potentially life saving and disability sparing in this group but the number of elderly patients studied in clinical trials, particularly those aged > or = 80 years, has been small. Indeed, < 50 patients aged > 80 years have been treated in clinical thrombolytic trials of ischaemic stroke. However, there is no evidence of a differential treatment effect by age. Multiple cohort studies have suggested that the risk of symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage among octogenarians is no different from that in younger patients. Thrombolysis can be safely offered to acute ischaemic stroke patients aged > or = 80 years, although robust data from randomized clinical trials are relatively scarce.     

A benefit-risk assessment of agents used in the secondary prevention of stroke.

Stroke is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Full assessment of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) patients is required to identify all risk factors and apply appropriate secondary preventative strategies. Antiplatelet therapies are effective in the secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke and can be justified despite adverse effects such as gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), aspirin plus dipyridamole, ticlopidine and clopidogrel are all of value but their adverse effect profiles vary significantly. Combinations of antiplatelet agents may offer additional benefit but not all combinations have been studied in stroke patients. Anticoagulation with agents such as warfarin is effective with coexisting atrial fibrillation and other conditions predisposing to cardioembolic stroke. Antihypertensive agents have been extensively studied in the primary prevention of stroke; however, relatively few trials of antihypertensive agents in the secondary prevention of stroke are available. The incidence of adverse effects of antihypertensive agents is relatively low and the benefit-risk profile would tend to favour their use in the secondary prevention of stroke. Recent studies of ACE inhibitors have identified an important role for these agents in the secondary prevention of stroke even in those who are normotensive and in those who have had a haemorrhagic stroke. The incidence of serious adverse effects with ACE inhibitors appears relatively low. Lipid-lowering agents may have a role to play in certain groups of patients with stroke. The incidence of adverse effects is relatively low with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Cigarette smoking is an important risk factor for stroke and evidence is available that smoking cessation does reduce the individual's risk of stroke. Pharmacological agents are available to help smoking cessation. In patients with diabetes mellitus, intensive regimens with insulin and oral hypoglycaemic agents have so far not definitively been shown to reduce the incidence of macrovascular complications such as stroke. Tight glycaemic control has been shown to improve microvascular complications such as retinopathy, nephropathy and neuropathy and hence this is reason enough to advocate the use of these agents. Future developments in the treatment of diabetes may help. Secondary prevention of stroke has improved greatly over the past decade and hopefully will continue to improve. The use of pharmacological agents available currently and in the future will be clarified and refined as further clinical trials report.     

Primary and secondary stroke prevention with antiplatelet drugs

Aspirin is not effective in the primary prevention of stroke. Patients with TIA or ischemic stroke carry a risk of recurrent stroke between 5 and 20% per year. In patients with TIA or ischemic stroke of noncardiac origin antiplatelet drugs are able to decrease the risk of stroke by 11-15% and the risk of stroke, MI and vascular death by 15-22%. Aspirin is the most widely used drug. It is affordable and effective. Low doses of 50-325 mg aspirin are as effective as high doses and cause less gastrointestinal side effects. Severe bleeding complications are dose-dependent. The combination of aspirin with slow release dipyridamole is superior to aspirin alone for stroke prevention. Clopidgrel is superior to aspirin in patients at high risk of recurrence. The combination of aspirin plus clopidogrel is not more effective than clopidogrel alone but carries a higher bleeding risk. None of the antiplatelet agents is able to reduce mortality.     

Adverse effects and drug interactions of antithrombotic agents used in prevention of ischaemic stroke

Stroke is the third most common cause of death in the US. Primary prevention of stroke can be achieved by control of risk factors including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, elevated cholesterol levels and smoking. Approximately one-third of all ischaemic strokes occur in patients with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). The mainstay of secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke is the addition of medical therapy with antithrombotic agents to control the risk factors for stroke. Antithrombotic therapy is associated with significant medical complications, particularly bleeding.Low-dose aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) has been shown to be as effective as high-dose aspirin in the prevention of stroke, with fewer adverse bleeding events. Aspirin has been shown to be as effective as warfarin in the prevention of noncardioembolic ischaemic stroke, with significantly fewer bleeding complications. Ticlopidine may be more effective in preventing stroke than aspirin, but is associated with unacceptable haematological complications. Clopidogrel may have some benefit over aspirin in preventing myocardial infarction, but has not been shown to be superior to aspirin in the prevention of stroke. The combination of clopidogrel and aspirin may be more effective than aspirin alone in acute coronary syndromes, but the incidence of adverse bleeding is significantly higher. Furthermore, the combination of aspirin with clopidogrel has not been shown to be more effective for prevention of recurrent stroke than clopidogrel alone, while the rate of bleeding complications was significantly higher with combination therapy. The combination of aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole has been demonstrated to be more effective than aspirin alone, with the same rate of adverse bleeding complications as low-dose aspirin. When selecting the appropriate antithrombotic agent for secondary prevention of stroke, the adverse event profile of the drug must be taken into account when assessing the overall efficacy of the treatment plan.     

Thrombolytic therapy for stroke: a review with particular reference to elderly patients

Clinical trials in the 1990s of intravenous thrombolysis for ischaemic stroke have involved over 3000 patients. Alteplase given within 3 hours of onset significantly reduces the combined end-point of death and disability. Although alteplase appears safe when given up to 6 hours after onset, individual trials have failed to confirm efficacy beyond 3 hours. Meta-analysis indicates that intravenous alteplase given up to 6 hours after stroke onset significantly reduces death or dependence 3 months after stroke. Two trials of intra-arterial pro-urokinase confirm benefits of treatment up to 6 hours in highly selected patients with angiographically confirmed proximal middle cerebral occlusion. Streptokinase increased the risk of early death significantly in 3 trials, with no overall reduction in eventual death and disability. Patients over 80 years have been excluded from most trials of alteplase, and experience in this age group is minimal. Increased incidence and poorer functional outcome in the elderly mean that thrombolysis may have greater absolute benefit in this group than in the young, but there is also a higher prevalence of absolute or relative potential contraindications to treatment (ranging from increased use of anticoagulant drugs to higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation). Further trials are necessary to address age restrictions and other important issues in the use of alteplase. Thrombolysis is likely to remain feasible for a minority of stroke patients of all ages, and there is a need for other acute treatment options.     

Current understanding of TRPM7 pharmacology and drug development for stroke

The initial excitement and countles efforts to find a pharmacological agent that disrupts the excitotoxic pathway of ischemic neuronal death have only led to disappointing clinical trials. Currently, a thrombolytic agent called recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is the only pharmacological treatment available for patients with acute ischemic stroke in most countries. Even though its efficacy has been confirmed repeatedly, rt-PA is considerably underused due to reasons including a short therapeutic window and repeated complications associated with its use. A search for alternative mechanisms that may operate dependently or independently with the well-established excitotoxic mechanism has led researchers to the discovery of newly described non-glutamate mechanisms. Among the latter, transient receptor potential melastatin 7 (TRPM7) is one of the important nonglutamate mechanisms in stroke, which has been evaluated in both in-vitro and in-vivo. In this review, we will discuss the current state of pharmacological treatments of ischemic stroke and provide evidence that TRPM7 is a promising therapeutic target of stroke.     

Cardioprotective effects and gastrointestinal risks of aspirin: Maintaining the delicate balance

Aspirin is a very useful medication for the prevention of cardiovascular thrombotic events in patients with or those at risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Aspirin, however, carries an increased risk for gastrointestinal (GI) injury (e.g., ulceration) and its complications (e.g., hemorrhage), which may be caused by its antiplatelet and gastric mucosal effects. In those with established CVD, aspirin use has been documented to decrease the risk of a first myocardial infarction (MI). Its effects on stroke and vascular death are less conclusive. The use of aspirin in these individuals is recommended only for those whose risk for cardiovascular events (based on coronary risk assessment tools) is sufficiently high that it outweighs the risk for GI complications. Secondary prevention refers to the use of aspirin to prevent cardiovascular events in patients with established CVD such as an MI, stroke, or angina. The use of aspirin in these individuals is recommended based on a documented decrease in future cardiovascular events and mortality. The risk for GI events with aspirin is at least additive to the risk for these events in those who also are receiving therapy with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Patients being treated with aspirin, even at 81 mg/day for cardioprotection, should be assessed for factors that increase the risk for GI injury. Studies have confirmed that co-therapy with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or misoprostol decreases the risk for GI injury and complications. Although both classes of such gastroprotective agents are effective, treatment with a PPI is tolerated better, with fewer patients discontinuing the drug because of side effects such as diarrhea.     

Guidelines for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major independent risk factor for stroke. AF is most commonly associated with nonvalvular cardiovascular disease and is especially frequent among the elderly. The annual risk for stroke in patients with AF is approximately 5% with a wide range depending on the presence of additional risk factors. For patients who cannot successfully be converted and maintained in normal sinus rhythm (NSR), antithrombotic therapy is an effective method for preventing stroke. The 2 drugs which are indicated for stroke prophylaxis in patients with AF are warfarin and aspirin. For primary prevention, warfarin reduces the risk of stroke approximately 68%. Aspirin therapy is less effective, resulting in a 20 to 30% risk reduction. Combination therapy with aspirin and low intensity warfarin adjusted to an International Normalised Ratio (INR) of 1.2 to 1.5 has not been shown to be superior to standard intensity warfarin with a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0. In patients with AF and a prior history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), the absolute risk reduction with warfarin is even greater because of the high risk of stroke in this population. In contrast, aspirin has not been shown to significantly reduce the risk of stroke in patients with AF when used for secondary prevention. When appropriately managed, warfarin is associated with a low risk of major bleeding. In controlled trials of highly selected patients, the annual rate of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) with warfarin was approximately 0.3%. Studies have shown that specialty anticoagulation clinics can achieve similar low rates of major bleeding. However, these results cannot be extrapolated to the general population. Factors which have been identified as predictors of bleeding include advanced age, number of medications and most importantly, the intensity of anticoagulation. INR values above 4.0 have been associated with an increased risk of major bleeding while values below 2.0 have been associated with thrombosis. Slow careful dosage titration, regular laboratory monitoring and patient education can substantially reduce the risk of complications. In patients with AF, antithrombotic therapy has been shown to be cost effective. For high risk patients, warfarin is the most cost-effective therapy, provided the risks for bleeding are minimised. In contrast, aspirin is the most cost-effective agent for low risk patients. Current practice guidelines for stroke prophylaxis recommend warfarin (target INR 2.5: range 2.0 to 3.0) for AF patients at high risk for stroke including those over 75 years of age or younger patients with additional risk factors. Aspirin should be reserved for low risk patients or those unable to take warfarin. Although these recommendations are strongly supported by the clinical trial evidence, studies show that many patients are not receiving appropriate antithrombotic therapy. In particular, warfarin is underutilised in high risk elderly patients. Additional studies are needed to identify barriers that prevent implementation of the clinical trial findings into clinical practice.     

Transient ischaemic attacks. Current treatment concepts

Transient ischaemic attacks are common, having an incidence of at least 50 per 100,000 population per annum, and the risk of stroke and/or death is about 10% per annum. Death is more often due to the complications of coronary artery disease than cerebrovascular disease. The most important issues in management are distinguishing transient ischaemic attacks from several other causes of 'transient focal neurological attacks', and managing the risk factors for vascular disease in general, particularly hypertension. The utility of specific 'antithrombotic' treatments is still uncertain, but for long term use aspirin seems to be the most promising. The only dose so far tested in clinical trials has been about 600mg twice daily but lower doses may theoretically be as, or more, effective. Trials of aspirin and other antiplatelet agents, and also of carotid endarterectomy and extracranial-to-intracranial bypass surgery are continuing and should be strongly encouraged. Although transient ischaemic attacks recover - by definition - in 24 hours, the pathophysiology, natural history, and treatment of focal cerebral ischaemia which recovers in a matter of days or weeks is probably rather similar.     

Management of acute ischaemic stroke in the elderly: tolerability of thrombolytics

Stroke and its consequences are of global concern. Although stroke can affect individuals of any age, it primarily affects the elderly. It is among the leading causes of severe disability and mortality. In recent years, acute stroke has become a medical emergency requiring urgent evaluation and treatment. Effective management of patients with acute stroke starts with organisation of the entire stroke care chain, from the community and prehospital scene, through the emergency department, to a dedicated stroke unit and then to comprehensive rehabilitation. Intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator; rt-PA) 0.9 mg/kg (maximum dose 90 mg) was shown to significantly improve outcome of acute ischaemic stroke, despite an increased rate of symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage, if treatment is initiated within 3 hours after the onset of symptoms to patients who meet strict eligibility criteria. Post-marketing studies have demonstrated that intravenous alteplase can be administered appropriately in a wide variety of hospital settings. However, strict adherence to the published protocol is mandatory, as failure to comply may be associated with an increased risk of symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage. Intra-arterial revascularisation may provide more complete restitution of flow than intravenous thrombolytic therapy and improve the clinical outcome if it can be undertaken in patients with occlusion of the middle cerebral artery, and possibly the basilar artery, within the first hours from stroke onset. However, further data are needed. Although intravenous alteplase is recommended for any age beyond 18 years, elderly patients, in particular patients aged > or = 80 years, were often excluded or under-represented in randomised clinical trials of thrombolysis, so that available data on risk/benefit ratio for the very elderly are limited. Small post-marketing series suggest that despite elderly patients over 80 years having greater pre-stroke disability, the use of intravenous alteplase in this patient group does not significantly differ in effectiveness and complications compared with the same treatment in patients aged under age 80 years. Further studies are necessary and elderly patients with acute stroke should be included in future trials of the merits of thrombolytic therapy.     

Aspirin for the prevention of cardiovascular events in the elderly

Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), the most widely used antiplatelet drug, is clinically effective for the prevention of vascular ischaemic events. Very few primary or secondary prevention trials address the benefit-risk ratio of aspirin in the elderly. In secondary prevention, it is generally accepted that the beneficial effect of aspirin in the general patient population, demonstrated by randomised controlled trials, can be extrapolated to the elderly. Elderly patients are at relatively high risk for the development of vascular disease and might also be expected to derive substantial benefit from regular aspirin administration. However, there is no consensus about the definition of elderly and no specific prospective trial conducted in elderly subjects is available. Retrospective studies in the elderly found that the benefit provided by aspirin in older patients was similar or increased compared with younger individuals. In primary prevention, the potential benefit of antiplatelet agents must be balanced against the risk of bleeding, which is higher in older patients. The risk-benefit trade-off from the use of low-dose aspirin in the elderly is not yet established and caution should be exercised when using aspirin in primary prevention. In conclusion, aspirin should only be given for primary and secondary prevention in the elderly after a comprehensive evaluation of an individual patient's thrombotic and haemorrhagic risk has been conducted.