Olanzapine in bipolar disorder

Olanzapine is currently marketed not only for the treatment of schizophrenia, but also for the treatment of acute mania and the prevention of relapse in patients successfully treated with this drug for a manic episode. A large body of good clinical trials supports these indications. In the mania trials, olanzapine was more efficacious than placebo, equal or more efficacious than valproate and more efficacious than lithium or valproate monotherapy when used in combination with either drug. A trial that compared olanzapine with haloperidol failed to show superiority of the atypical versus the conventional. Olanzapine showed a modest but statistically significant effect in the treatment of bipolar depression; this modest effect was substantially enhanced in combination with fluoxetine. The long-term trials showed that olanzapine was better than placebo in the prevention of manic and depressive relapse and not inferior to lithium or valproate. The combination of olanzapine with lithium or valproate was also more efficacious than lithium or valproate alone in the prevention of manic relapse in patients partially non-responding to monotherapy with lithium or valproate. All these trials suggest that olanzapine may be a valuable drug in the short- and long-term treatment of bipolar I disorder. However, there are some concerns about the safety and tolerability of olanzapine in this population, as far as weight gain and metabolic syndrome are concerned, which may be addressed in future pharmacovigilance studies.     

Olanzapine in bipolar disorder

Olanzapine is currently marketed not only for the treatment of schizophrenia, but also for the treatment of acute mania and the prevention of relapse in patients successfully treated with this drug for a manic episode. A large body of good clinical trials supports these indications. In the mania trials, olanzapine was more efficacious than placebo, equal or more efficacious than valproate and more efficacious than lithium or valproate monotherapy when used in combination with either drug. A trial that compared olanzapine with haloperidol failed to show superiority of the atypical versus the conventional. Olanzapine showed a modest but statistically significant effect in the treatment of bipolar depression; this modest effect was substantially enhanced in combination with fluoxetine. The long-term trials showed that olanzapine was better than placebo in the prevention of manic and depressive relapse and not inferior to lithium or valproate. The combination of olanzapine with lithium or valproate was also more efficacious than lithium or valproate alone in the prevention of manic relapse in patients partially non-responding to monotherapy with lithium or valproate. All these trials suggest that olanzapine may be a valuable drug in the short- and long-term treatment of bipolar I disorder. However, there are some concerns about the safety and tolerability of olanzapine in this population, as far as weight gain and metabolic syndrome are concerned, which may be addressed in future pharmacovigilance studies.     

Polytherapy in bipolar disorder

Bipolar disorder is a life-long condition that is associated with frequent recurrence/relapse of symptoms. Although putative mood stabilisers, such as lithium, are considered to improve the natural course of bipolar disorder, complete long-term remission is rarely achieved. In order to effectively control mood symptoms and to reduce relapse, clinicians often use polypharmacy to treat patients with bipolar disorder. In this article, we examine the recent literature on treatment strategies in bipolar disorder to determine if combination treatments provide additional benefit over monotherapy for the management of various phases of bipolar disorder. The evidence suggests that for acute mania a combination of lithium or valproate and an atypical antipsychotic is the most effective approach, with approximately 20% more patients responding to the combination than to monotherapy with any antimanic agent. Few studies have examined the use of combination therapy in comparison to monotherapy for bipolar depression. The limited evidence suggests that lithium plus an antidepressant appears to be more effective than lithium alone in those with lower serum lithium concentrations. Similarly, the combination of olanzapine plus fluoxetine is more effective than olanzapine alone. There is consensus that antidepressant monotherapy is not appropriate because of concerns of a manic switch, but monotherapy with lithium or lamotrigine may be adequate for mild to moderate bipolar depression. For maintenance treatment, commonly used agents, such as lithium, valproate or olanzapine appear to be most effective in preventing manic relapses, whereas lamotrigine is more effective in preventing depressive relapses. As a result of these findings, it makes intuitive sense to combine lamotrigine with lithium, valproate or an atypical antipsychotic to achieve better mood stability. However, the efficacy and safety of such combinations have not been systematically compared with monotherapy. Preliminary studies suggest that lithium plus valproate may be more effective than lithium alone in preventing affective relapses. Similarly, the combination of lithium or valproate plus olanzapine seems to be more effective than monotherapy with a mood stabiliser in preventing manic episodes.     

Olanzapine: a review of its use in the management of bipolar I disorder

Olanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic that is approved in the US and Europe for the oral treatment of acute manic episodes in patients with bipolar I disorder, and for maintenance therapy to prevent recurrence in responders.Oral olanzapine is effective in the treatment of bipolar mania, both as single agent therapy and as adjunctive therapy in combination with lithium or valproate semisodium. In the treatment of acute episodes, olanzapine is superior to placebo and at least as effective as lithium, valproate semisodium, haloperidol and risperidone in reducing the symptoms of mania and inducing remission. Additional comparative studies are required to determine the efficacy of olanzapine relative to newer atypical antipsychotics, such as quetiapine, ziprasidone and aripiprazole. Olanzapine is also effective at delaying or preventing relapse during long-term maintenance therapy in treatment responders, and is currently the only atypical antipsychotic approved for this indication. Current evidence suggests that olanzapine may be more effective than lithium in preventing relapse into mania, but not relapse into depression or relapse overall. Olanzapine is generally well tolerated, and although it is associated with a higher incidence of weight gain than most atypical agents, it has a low incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). Therefore, oral olanzapine is a useful first-line or adjunctive agent for both the acute treatment of manic episodes and the long-term prevention of relapse into manic, depressive or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder.     

Spotlight on olanzapine in bipolar I disorder

Olanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic that is approved in the US and Europe for the oral treatment of acute manic episodes in patients with bipolar I disorder and for maintenance therapy to prevent recurrence in responders. Oral olanzapine is effective in the treatment of bipolar mania, both as single agent therapy and as adjunctive therapy in combination with lithium or valproate semisodium. In the treatment of acute episodes, olanzapine is superior to placebo and at least as effective as lithium, valproate semisodium, haloperidol and risperidone in reducing the symptoms of mania and inducing remission. Additional comparative studies are required to determine the efficacy of olanzapine relative to newer atypical antipsychotics such as quetiapine, ziprasidone and aripiprazole. Olanzapine is also effective at delaying or preventing relapse during long-term maintenance therapy in treatment responders and is currently the only atypical antipsychotic approved for this indication. Current evidence suggests that olanzapine may be more effective than lithium in preventing relapse into mania, but not relapse into depression or relapse overall. Olanzapine is generally well tolerated and, although it is associated with a higher incidence of weight gain than most atypical agents, it has a low incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms. Therefore, oral olanzapine is a useful first-line or adjunctive agent for both the acute treatment of manic episodes and the long-term prevention of relapse into manic, depressive or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder.     

Pharmacological interventions for the prevention of relapse in bipolar disorder: a systematic review of controlled trials

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials evaluating all clinically relevant pharmacological interventions for the prevention of relapse in people with bipolar disorder. Thirty-four trials were included in the review. Direct comparisons with placebo and with lithium were available for most drugs. In addition, there were direct comparisons of valproate vs. olanzapine, imipramine vs. lithium plus imipramine, olanzapine plus mood stabilisers vs. mood stabilisers and perphenazine plus mood stabilisers vs. mood stabilisers. Methodological quality varied across studies and the strength of evidence was not equal for all treatments or for all comparisons. There is evidence from placebo-controlled trials for the efficacy of lithium, valproate and lamotrigine as maintenance therapy for the prevention of relapse in bipolar disorder. Three drugs have a significant effect in the prevention of manic relapses (lithium, olanzapine and aripiprazole) and three in the prevention of depressive symptoms (valproate, lamotrigine and imipramine). Imipramine is little used in practice, because of concern about adverse effects. The significant effects of olanzapine and aripiprazole were demonstrated in selected responsive bipolar I patients only. Despite widespread use in clinical practice, there is little evidence to support the efficacy of combination therapy.     

The cost-effectiveness of lamotrigine in the maintenance treatment of adults with bipolar I disorder

OBJECTIVE: To present an economic model and cost-effectiveness estimates for lamotrigine in maintenance treatment of bipolar I disorder (BD-I) using outcomes from the pivotal lamotrigine trials. The main comparator treatments in the pivotal trials were lithium and .no maintenance. (acute-only) treatment. A comparison with olanzapine was included as an indirect analysis following publication of data during the course of our research. METHODS: A Markov model was built around the 3 health states of euthymia, mania, and depression. The base-case model simulates a cohort of 1,000 patients with BD-I who have recently stabilized after resolution of a bipolar mania episode. The cohort was modeled for a period of 18 months. Resource-use estimates were derived from best available published data, treatment guidelines, a physician survey, and published unit cost data. Outputs were measured in terms of costs per acute mood episode avoided, costs per euthymic day gained, and costs per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Direct health care payer costs are used in the analyses. RESULTS: The base-case model for patients with a recent manic episode indicated that lamotrigine is the most effective treatment for avoiding both acute depression episodes and all types of acute episodes (depression and mania). It is also the most effective treatment in terms of number of euthymic days achieved (309 days per patient per year). Olanzapine is most effective for avoiding acute mania episodes. Total direct costs of treatment are lowest for the lithium treatment arm (Dollars 8,710 per patient for the 18-month period). All maintenance therapies were cost effective compared with the no-maintenance (acute-only treatment) arm. In the base case, lamotrigine had incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of Dollars 30 per euthymic day and Dollars 2,400 per acute episode avoided compared with lithium. A QALY analysis indicated that lamotrigine is cost effective in patients with a recent manic episode at Dollars 26,000 per QALY. The base-case model indicated that lamotrigine dominates olanzapine, (that is, lamotrigine costs less and is more effective than olanzapine) in patients with a recent manic episode. In a sensitivity analysis using outcomes from the pivotal trial of recently depressed patients, lamotrigine, in comparison with lithium, was not shown to be as cost effective as in the recently manic patients, but it was still cost effective compared with no maintenance treatment. CONCLUSIONS: For a defined cohort of patients with BD-I, the pharmacoeconomic model indicated that prevention of mood episodes with lithium and lamotrigine is cost effective in patients with a recent manic, mixed, or hypomanic episode. The conclusions with respect to the indirect comparison with olanzapine should be validated if and when direct trial data become available. Cost-effectiveness of maintenance treatments for patients with BD-I (recently depressed as well as recently manic) are likely to improve in models with a broader costing perspective and that take a longer time frame. Further research into the outcome implications of health-related quality of life and other BD subgroups are recommended.     

Quetiapine. A me-too neuroleptic; no panacea

Quetiapine, a so-called atypical neuroleptic, is authorised in the European Union for use in the standard indications of neuroleptics. However, it is the only neuroleptic licensed for the treatment and prevention of depressive episodes in patients with bipolar disorder, and as add-on therapy for depressive episodes inadequately improved by an antidepressant. In patients with schizophrenia, the authors of two meta-analyses, one including 12 trials (3443 patients) and the other 21 trials (4101 patients), concluded that quetiapine was not clearly more effective than other conventional or atypical neuroleptics. In bipolar patients with manic episodes, the results of two trials suggest that quetiapine monotherapy is not more effective than haloperidol or lithium. Two placebo-controlled trials of add-on quetiapine therapy in patients receiving a mood stabiliser (lithium or divalproate sodium) yielded conflicting results. In bipolar patients with a depressive episode, the only available trial, versus placebo and versus paroxetine in 740 patients, failed to provide conclusive evidence. In two trials with controversial designs, in which quetiapine was added to a mood stabiliser in order to prevent new depressive or manic episodes in bipolar patients, quetiapine appeared to be more effective than placebo: about 15% to 20% more patients were stabilised on quetiapine than on placebo. There are no trials to show whether quetiapine is more effective in preventing manic episodes than a neuroleptic. In a trial including 1226 patients in whom quetiapine was effective during a first depressive or manic episode, quetiapine appeared to be more effective than lithium in preventing a depressive episode (relapse rate 8.9% versus 13.5%) but not a manic episode. These comparisons may be biased, however. Two placebo-controlled trials assessed quetiapine add-on therapy in patients in whom an antidepressant was inadequately effective. The conflicting results obtained in these two trials rule out drawing firm conclusions as to the efficacy of quetiapine. Overall, quetiapine has the adverse effect profile common to atypical neuroleptics. However, hypercholesterolaemia is more frequent than with risperidone, and both clinical trials and post-marketing data have shown that quetiapine carries a risk of hypothyroidism. Animal studies suggested a risk of cataracts, but this adverse effect has not yet been confirmed in humans. The risk of sudden cardiovascular death appears similar to that reported with other neuroleptics. A retrospective survey suggests that the consequences of acute overdose are more severe with quetiapine than with other neuroleptics. Quetiapine is metabolised by cytochrome P450 isoenzyme CYP3A4, creating a high risk of pharmacokinetic interactions. In practice, quetiapine has not been shown to provide a therapeutic advantage over other treatments, although additional trials in the prevention of depressive episodes are warranted in selected patients.     

Olanzapine as long-term adjunctive therapy in treatment-resistant bipolar disorder

The aim of this study was to estimate the long-term effectiveness of olanzapine as adjunctive therapy in patients with bipolar disorder who exhibited an inadequate response to mood stabilizers. Twenty-three Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) patients with bipolar I and II were assessed by means of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia and entered if they gave their consent to participate. All of them had experienced frequent relapses, residual subsyndromal symptoms, and inadequate responses to other drugs, such as lithium, valproate, or carbamazepine. While maintaining other drugs, they all received open-label, increasing doses of olanzapine, until achieving clinical response. Other drugs were maintained. The patients were assessed several consecutive times from baseline to the endpoint with the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale for use in bipolar illness. Records of recurrences, hospitalizations, and side effects were also collected. The last-observation-carried-forward analysis showed that there was a significant reduction of CGI scores after the introduction of olanzapine, either in manic symptoms (p = 0.0015), depressive symptoms (p = 0.0063), or global symptoms (p = 0.0003). The most frequent adverse events were somnolence (17%) and weight gain (13%). The mean dose of olanzapine at the end of the 43-week follow-up was 8.1 mg/day. Olanzapine may be a useful medication for the long-term adjunctive treatment of patients with bipolar disorder who exhibit a poor response to mood stabilizers, such as lithium, valproate, or carbamazepine. These results suggest mood-stablizing properties of olanzapine.     

Resistance to lithium: What alternatives exist?

Lithium is highly valued for the treatment of mania and depression. Resistance may occur to one of its two main indications: firstly for the treatment of acute episodes of mania, and secondly for the prevention of relapse either of bipolar affective disorder (manic depression) or of unipolar affective disorder (recurrent depression). For the management of manic episodes, alternative possibilities include neuroleptics, carbamazepine, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and sodium valproate. Neuroleptics are effective, but may precipitate depression. Carbamazepine is effective either alone or as a supplement to the lithium. ECT is an impressively powerful treatment for mania. Valproate appears to be effective but more studies are desirable. Alternatives to lithium in the prevention of relapse of recurrent affective disorders include antidepressants, carbamazepine and ECT. For the prevention of relapses of bipolar affective disorder antidepressants have the disadvantage of increasing the frequency of manic episodes. In unipolar disorder they are a valid alternative to lithium but with some disadvantages. Carbamazepine is effective in the prophylaxis of bipolar affective disorder and should be considered especially in patients with rapid cycling or those with psychotic features. Only open studies are available on ECT and valproate as prophylactic agents. Preliminary work has been carried out on verapamil, flupenthixol, clonazepam, methylene blue, clorgyline, clonidine, tryptophan and 5-hydroxy tryptamine.     

Maintenance efficacy of divalproex in the prevention of bipolar depression.

Breakthrough depression is a common problem in the treatment of bipolar disorder. Only one, recently published, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial has examined the efficacy of divalproex in the prevention of depressive episodes in bipolar patients. This report describes, in further detail, the findings from that trial of the effect of divalproex on multiple dimensions of depressive morbidity in bipolar disorder. A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study was conducted over a 52-week maintenance period. Bipolar I patients, who may have been treated with open-label lithium or divalproex and who met recovery criteria within 3 months of onset of an index manic episode, were randomized to maintenance treatment with divalproex, lithium, or placebo in a 2 : 1 : 1 ratio. Adjunctive paroxetine or sertraline for breakthrough depression was allowed in maintenance phase. Outcome measures were the rate of early discontinuation for depression, time to depressive relapse, proportion of patients with depressive relapse, mean change in Depressive Syndrome Scale score, proportion of patients receiving antidepressants, and time in the study. Among patients taking an antidepressant, a higher percentage of patients on placebo than divalproex discontinued early for depression. Patients who were previously hospitalized for affective episodes or took divalproex in the open period relapsed later on divalproex than on lithium during the maintenance period. Divalproex-treated patients had less worsening of depressive symptoms than lithium-treated patients during maintenance. Indices of severity of prestudy illness course predicted worse outcome in all treatment groups. Divalproex improved several dimensions of depressive morbidity and reduced the probability of depressive relapse in bipolar disorder, particularly in patients who had responded to divalproex when manic, and among patients with a more severe course of illness.     

Acute and maintenance treatment with mood stabilizers

Treatment of bipolar disorder is complicated by the multiple phases of the illness, dimensional symptomatology that varies considerably across individuals, and a limited spectrum of activity for all mood stabilizers. Randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled studies provide clear guidelines to the overall efficacy of treatments for mania. However, for secondary questions, such as the treatment to employ when lithium or valproate is inadequate as monotherapy, evidence is incomplete, and usually derived from both smaller and less well-designed studies. For mania, the spectrum of efficacy of valproate is broader than for other mood stabilizers. However, many patients obtain inadequate benefit from monotherapy regimens of all mood stabilizers. Recent studies indicate that for patients who develop mania while taking a mood stabilizer, combinations of an antipsychotic and a mood stabilizer yield greater improvement than does continuation of the mood stabilizer alone. Maintenance-treatment studies support the efficacy of lithium, valproate and lamotrigine, although with a different spectrum of benefits and limitations for each. Valproate and lithium provide greater benefits for prevention of manic relapses and control of manic symptomatology than for depression. Several studies indicate actual worsening in depressive aspects of bipolar disorder with lithium treatment. Lamotrigine appears effective in delaying relapse into a new episode, with most benefits limited to delaying time to depression. Lamotrigine has not shown anti-manic activity in placebo-controlled studies. In contrast to traditional antidepressant medications, lamotrigine has not been associated with induction of mania, or of rapid-cycling illness symptomatology. Recent studies reported that carbamazepine was inferior to valproate in acute mania, and inferior to lithium in maintenance treatment. Other putative mood stabilizers have to date yielded negative or inconclusive results in studies in mania. Systematic studies are needed to clarify treatment guidelines for youth with bipolar disorder, and for other special populations, e.g. pregnant women and the elderly.     

Lamotrigine: a review of its use in bipolar disorder

Lamotrigine (Lamictal), a phenyltriazine derivative, is a well established anticonvulsant agent that has shown efficacy in the prevention of mood episodes in adult patients with bipolar I disorder. The mechanism of action of the drug in patients with bipolar disorder may be related to the inhibition of sodium and calcium channels in presynaptic neurons and subsequent stabilisation of the neuronal membrane. Lamotrigine monotherapy significantly delayed time to intervention with additional pharmacotherapy or electroconvulsive therapy for any new mood episode (mania, hypomania, depression and mixed episodes), compared with placebo, in two large, randomised, double-blind trials of 18 months' duration. Additionally, lamotrigine was significantly superior to placebo at prolonging time to intervention for depression. These effects of lamotrigine were demonstrated in both recently manic/hypomanic and recently depressed patients. Lamotrigine showed efficacy in delaying manic/hypomanic episodes in pooled data only, although lithium was superior to lamotrigine on this measure. Two of four double-blind, short-term studies have shown lamotrigine to be more effective than placebo in the treatment of patients with treatment-refractory bipolar disorder or those with bipolar depression. Lamotrigine has not demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of acute mania.Lamotrigine was generally well tolerated in maintenance studies with the most common adverse events being headache, nausea, infection and insomnia. Incidences of diarrhoea and tremor were significantly lower in lamotrigine- than in lithium-treated patients. The incidence of serious rash with lamotrigine treatment was 0.1% in all studies of bipolar disorder and included one case of mild Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Lamotrigine did not appear to cause bodyweight gain. The dosage of lamotrigine is titrated over a 6-week period to 200 mg/day to minimise the incidence of serious rash. Adjustments to the initial and target dosages are required if coadministered with valproate semisodium or carbamazepine. CONCLUSION: Lamotrigine has been shown to be an effective maintenance therapy for patients with bipolar I disorder, significantly delaying time to intervention for any mood episode. Additionally, lamotrigine significantly delayed time to intervention for a depressive episode and showed limited efficacy in delaying time to intervention for a manic/hypomanic episode, compared with placebo. Although not approved for the short-term treatment of mood episodes, lamotrigine has shown efficacy in the acute treatment of patients with bipolar depression but has not demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of acute mania. Lamotrigine is generally well tolerated, does not appear to cause bodyweight gain and, unlike lithium, generally does not require monitoring of serum levels.     

Spotlight on lamotrigine in bipolar disorder

Lamotrigine (Lamictal), a phenyltriazine derivative, is a well established anticonvulsant agent that has shown efficacy in the prevention of mood episodes in adult patients with bipolar I disorder. The mechanism of action of the drug in patients with bipolar disorder may be related to the inhibition of sodium and calcium channels in presynaptic neurons and subsequent stabilisation of the neuronal membrane. Lamotrigine monotherapy significantly delayed time to intervention with additional pharmacotherapy or electroconvulsive therapy for any new mood episode (mania, hypomania, depression and mixed episodes), compared with placebo, in two large, randomised, double-blind trials of 18 months' duration. Additionally, lamotrigine was significantly superior to placebo at prolonging time to intervention for depression. These effects of lamotrigine were demonstrated in both recently manic/hypomanic and recently depressed patients. Lamotrigine showed efficacy in delaying manic/hypomanic episodes in pooled data only, although lithium was superior to lamotrigine on this measure. Two of four double-blind, short-term studies have shown lamotrigine to be more effective than placebo in the treatment of patients with treatment-refractory bipolar disorder or those with bipolar depression. Lamotrigine has not demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of acute mania. Lamotrigine was generally well tolerated in maintenance studies with the most common adverse events being headache, nausea, infection and insomnia. Incidences of diarrhoea and tremor were significantly lower in lamotrigine- than in lithium-treated patients. The incidence of serious rash with lamotrigine treatment was 0.1% in all studies of bipolar disorder and included one case of mild Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Lamotrigine did not appear to cause bodyweight gain. The dosage of lamotrigine is titrated over a 6-week period to 200 mg/day to minimise the incidence of serious rash. Adjustments to the initial and target dosages are required if coadministered with valproate semisodium or carbamazepine. CONCLUSION: Lamotrigine has been shown to be an effective maintenance therapy for patients with bipolar I disorder, significantly delaying time to intervention for any mood episode. Additionally, lamotrigine significantly delayed time to intervention for a depressive episode and showed limited efficacy in delaying time to intervention for a manic/hypomanic episode, compared with placebo. Although not approved for the short-term treatment of mood episodes, lamotrigine has shown efficacy in the acute treatment of patients with bipolar depression but has not demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of acute mania. Lamotrigine is generally well tolerated, does not appear to cause bodyweight gain and, unlike lithium, generally does not require monitoring of serum levels.     

Novel treatments for bipolar disorder

Treatments other than lithium have recently emerged as equally important in the management of bipolar disorder. The spectrum of efficacy of newer treatments differs from lithium and among the novel drug treatments valproate, generally used as the better tolerated divalproex form, principally benefits manic symptomatology both acutely and in prophylaxis. Atypical antipsychotic drugs have demonstrated efficacy in reducing acute manic symptoms. No controlled evidence of efficacy in prophylaxis has been published. Lamotrigine has demonstrated efficacy in both acute bipolar depression and maintenance efficacy in rapid cycling bipolar patients, especially those patients with bipolar II disorder, which is principally manifested as depression. Randomised, double-blind, placebo- controlled studies provide good evidence that regimens of risperidone or olanzapine in combination with lithium or valproate provide greater improvement in acute mania than the mood stabilisers alone. Similarly, valproate combined with antipsychotics provided greater improvement in mania than antipsychotic medication alone and resulted in lower dosage of the antipsychotic medication. A positive but unclear placebo-controlled study of omega-3 fatty acids added to lithium in bipolar disorder needs confirmation in standard clinical trial paradigms. Several other drugs that were reported as beneficial in various facets of bipolar disorder in open trials have not differed from placebo when studied in randomised, placebo-controlled trials.     

Novel treatments for bipolar disorder

Treatments other than lithium have recently emerged as equally important in the management of bipolar disorder. The spectrum of efficacy of newer treatments differs from lithium and among the novel drug treatments valproate, generally used as the better tolerated divalproex form, principally benefits manic symptomatology both acutely and in prophylaxis. Atypical antipsychotic drugs have demonstrated efficacy in reducing acute manic symptoms. No controlled evidence of efficacy in prophylaxis has been published. Lamotrigine has demonstrated efficacy in both acute bipolar depression and maintenance efficacy in rapid cycling bipolar patients, especially those patients with bipolar II disorder, which is principally manifested as depression. Randomised, double-blind, placebo- controlled studies provide good evidence that regimens of risperidone or olanzapine in combination with lithium or valproate provide greater improvement in acute mania than the mood stabilisers alone. Similarly, valproate combined with antipsychotics provided greater improvement in mania than antipsychotic medication alone and resulted in lower dosage of the antipsychotic medication. A positive but unclear placebo-controlled study of omega-3 fatty acids added to lithium in bipolar disorder needs confirmation in standard clinical trial paradigms. Several other drugs that were reported as beneficial in various facets of bipolar disorder in open trials have not differed from placebo when studied in randomised, placebo-controlled trials.     

The role of quetiapine in the treatment of bipolar disorder

Through a review of randomised, controlled trials, this article evaluates the efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine in the acute and maintenance phases of bipolar disorder. In trials involving mania patients, quetiapine was found to be effective as adjunctive therapy in combination with lithium or valproate, significantly superior to placebo, and equal to lithium or haloperidol as monotherapy. With regard to the prevention of relapses in bipolar disorder, quetiapine seems to differ from other atypical antipsychotics in its characteristics as a mood stabiliser, which are associated with a promising efficacy in the treatment of bipolar depressive episodes. However, further larger controlled long-term prospective studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of quetiapine for the prevention of relapses in bipolar disorder. Quetiapine seems to have a satisfactory safety and tolerability profile, with a low prevalence of extrapyramidal symptom-related adverse events, treatment-emergent depression and weight gain. Sedation is the main side effect of treatment with quetiapine.     

Pazopanib,a new therapy for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma

Through a review of randomised, controlled trials, this article evaluates the efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine in the acute and maintenance phases of bipolar disorder. In trials involving mania patients, quetiapine was found to be effective as adjunctive therapy in combination with lithium or valproate, significantly superior to placebo, and equal to lithium or haloperidol as monotherapy. With regard to the prevention of relapses in bipolar disorder, quetiapine seems to differ from other atypical antipsychotics in its characteristics as a mood stabiliser, which are associated with a promising efficacy in the treatment of bipolar depressive episodes. However, further larger controlled long-term prospective studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of quetiapine for the prevention of relapses in bipolar disorder. Quetiapine seems to have a satisfactory safety and tolerability profile, with a low prevalence of extrapyramidal symptom-related adverse events, treatment-emergent depression and weight gain. Sedation is the main side effect of treatment with quetiapine.     

Effectiveness of psychotropic medications in the maintenance phase of bipolar disorder: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to examine the efficacy of maintenance treatments for bipolar disorder. Placebo-controlled or active comparator bipolar maintenance clinical trials of ≥6 months' duration with at least 15 patients/treatment group were identified using Medline, EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane databases (1993 to July 2010). The main outcome measure was relative risk for relapse for patients in remission. Twenty trials (5,364 patients) were identified. Overall, lithium and quetiapine were the most studied agents (eight and five trials, respectively). The majority of studies included patients who had previously responded to treatment for an acute episode. All interventions, with the exception of perphenazine+mood stabilizer, showed a relative risk for manic/mixed or depressive relapse below 1.0, although there was variation in the statistical significance of the findings vs. placebo. No monotherapy was associated with a significantly reduced risk for both manic/mixed and depressed relapse. Of the combination treatments, only quetiapine+lithium/divalproex, was associated with a significantly reduced risk vs. comparator (placebo+lithium/valproate) for relapse at both the manic/mixed and depressed poles of bipolar illness. Limitations for the analysis include differences in study durations and definitions of relapse. In conclusion, available maintenance therapies show considerable variation in efficacy. The efficacy of lithium and divalproex has been confirmed, but newer therapies, such as a number of atypical antipsychotics were also shown to be effective in bipolar disorder. Efficacy of all maintenance interventions needs to be balanced against the safety and tolerability profiles of individual agents.     

Polarity index of pharmacological agents used for maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder

Over one half of bipolar patients have been reported to be more prone to either depressive or manic relapses. This study aimed to define profiles of drugs used for maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder (BD) by the means of Polarity Index. Polarity Index is a new metric indicating the relative antimanic versus antidepressive preventive efficacy of drugs. Polarity Index was retrieved by calculating Number Needed to Treat (NNT) for prevention of depression and NNT for prevention of mania ratio, as emerging from the results of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Included trials were randomized and double blind, with a minimal duration of 24 weeks, assessing effectiveness of a mood stabilizer or antipsychotic drug alone or in combination with a mood stabilizing agent versus a placebo comparator in BD maintenance treatment. Polarity Index value above 1.0 indicates a relative greater antimanic prophylactic efficacy, number below 1.0 a relative greater antidepressive efficacy. The polarity index for the drugs used in maintenance therapy for bipolar disorder was 12.09 for risperidone, 4.38 for aripiprazole, 3.91 for ziprasidone, 2.98 for olanzapine, 1.39 for lithium, 1.14 for quetiapine, and 0.40 for lamotrigine. Polarity index of valproate and oxcarbazepine may not be reliable due to the failure of their maintenance trials. The polarity index provides a measure of how much antidepressant versus antimanic a drug is in bipolar disorder prophylaxis, and may guide the choice of maintenance therapy in bipolar patients.