假体植入在即刻乳房再造中的应用

目的探讨并分析保留皮肤乳腺切除术后应用Becker可扩张假体或Mentor光面假体植入即刻乳房再造的手术方法、效果及并发症。方法本组共96例，行保留皮肤的乳腺切除术后，再行Becker可扩张假体或Mentor光面假体植入即刻乳房再造，其中Mentor光面假体植入68例，可扩张假体植入28例。本组有30例患者保留乳头、乳晕。根据乳房的体积、形状、与对侧乳房的对称性比较及患者满意情况，评价手术效果。结果效果优29例，良47例，一般12例，差8例。并发症发生率为12．5％。结论假体植入即刻乳房再造安全可靠，手术效果好，并发症少，适用于早期乳腺癌患者。选择性保留乳头、乳晕并不增加局部复发的风险。手术成功的关键在于病例的选择，乳腺癌根治切口设计及术中、术后的处理。     

即刻乳房再造在乳腺癌手术中的应用与探讨

目的探讨即刻乳房再造在乳腺癌手术中的应用价值。方法自2005年10月至2009年2月共完成了26例乳腺癌改良根治即刻乳房再造手术,其中10例为局部晚期乳腺癌。即刻腹直肌肌皮瓣乳房再造术12例,背阔肌肌皮瓣乳房再造术8例,保留乳头乳晕复合体皮下乳腺全切假体植入乳房再造术5例,保留乳头乳晕复合体皮下乳腺全切背阔肌肌皮瓣结合假体植入乳房再造术1例。结果全组手术切缘病理均达到阴性,皮瓣全部成活,无假体相关并发症,亦无腹壁疝发生。再造乳房形态满意,肌皮瓣再造乳房可以安全地耐受术后放疗,随访1～40个月无局部复发病例。结论即刻乳房再造手术从根本上改善了乳腺癌患者术后的生活质量,在局部晚期乳腺癌手术中,肌皮瓣乳房再造还可以为足够的切除范围提供安全保障,颇具临床应用价值。     

乳腺切除术后即刻乳房再造术式的选择

乳腺切除术后即刻乳房再造与二期再造相比在术后效果、患者心理、住院时间以及所需费用等方面均具有明显优势.为乳腺癌术后患者选择一个合适的即刻乳房再造方式十分必要.本文对TRAM皮瓣、双蒂TRAM皮瓣、DIEP皮瓣、背阔肌肌皮瓣、扩张器/假体置入以及背阔肌肌皮瓣联合假体置入等各种即刻乳房再造术式的适应证与禁忌症进行综述.并从肿瘤学角度针对各种乳腺癌根治术如改良根治术、保留乳头、乳晕的乳腺切除术，以及保留皮肤的乳腺切除术、保乳手术后即刻乳房再造等术式的选择策略进行讨论.     

保留皮肤的乳腺癌改良根治术后即刻乳房再造的临床应用

目的探讨保留皮肤的乳腺癌改良根治术后即刻再造乳房的适应证、方法、效果及可行性。方法2002年1月至2007年11月本院对94例乳腺癌患者行保留乳房皮肤皮下乳腺组织切除加腋窝淋巴结清扫术后，应用下腹部横行腹直肌肌皮瓣（transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap，TRAM）、背阔肌肌皮瓣（latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap，LDM）联合或不联合假体、单纯乳房假体植入4种方式即刻再造乳房。结果再造手术均取得成功。带蒂TRAM再造47例，LDM再造共42例（其中联合假体28例），单纯乳房假体植入5例。4例出现轻微术后并发症（4．25％）。经过3～67个月随访，局部区域复发率为0，再造乳房形态自然，效果满意，术后外观评价优良率97．87％。结论合理选择病例行保留皮肤或保留乳头乳晕乳腺癌改良根治术后即刻乳房再造是安全可靠的，切口隐蔽并能够保留原有乳房皮肤的感觉，从而获得最佳美容效果，值得广泛推广和应用。     

组织扩张术在即刻乳房再造中的应用

目的改进即刻乳房再造的手术方法,将软组织扩张术应用于即刻乳房再造术中,避免再造乳房术后出现"补丁样"外观,并保留乳房再造的最佳条件。方法在乳腺癌切除后即刻于胸大肌后间隙置入圆形扩张器,并于术后8~12周注水扩张至理想体积。Ⅱ期再造手术采用硅凝胶乳房假体、背阔肌肌皮瓣+硅凝胶乳房假体、背阔肌肌皮瓣及DIEP皮瓣置换扩张器完成乳房再造。结果 2009年6月至2011年6月,采用该技术进行扩张法即刻乳房再造36例,平均完成乳房再造时间3.5个月。术后无假体外露、皮瓣坏死等并发症出现,也无原手术切口的延长或新手术切口增加。术后随访6~12个月,患者对手术效果满意率达97.2%。结论采用组织扩张法进行即刻乳房再造,可以保留最佳的乳房再造条件,避免了术后放疗对乳房假体的影响,可以避免由于采用皮瓣修补胸部皮肤缺损而出现的"补丁样"外观,是理想的即刻乳房再造方法之一。     

20例保留皮肤的乳腺癌全乳切除和即刻乳房再造

选择早期乳腺癌患者20例,行保留皮肤的乳腺癌改良根治术后即刻植入假体(14例)或背阔肌肌皮瓣(2例),或联合乳房再造(4例),部分保留乳头乳晕复合体.20例患者中,保留乳房皮肤及部分保留乳头乳晕,均未见局部复发.再造效果优6例,良12例,尚可2例,无严重变形病例.无严重并发症,均按时进行辅助治疗.保留乳房皮肤及乳头乳晕的乳腺癌全乳切除术局部复发率低,术中即刻假体、背阔肌肌皮瓣或联合乳房再造手术效果好,并发症少.     

乳腺癌术后可扩张假体与自体组织乳房重建的临床比较

目的:探讨并比较分析保留皮肤乳腺切除术后,应用即刻可扩张假体植入乳房重建与即刻自体组织乳房重建的手术方法、效果及并发症.方法:60例患者行保留皮肤的乳腺改良根治术后乳房重建,其中可扩张假体植入重建43例,即刻自体组织重建17例.根据乳房的体积、形状、与对侧乳房的对称性比较及患者满意度,评价两种手术的效果.结果:随访12个月,可扩张假体乳房重建组到达良好以上为93％,自体组织重建组为86％,两种重建方法治疗效果差异无统计学意义.可扩张假体植入乳房重建安全可靠,手术效果好,并发症少.结论:可扩张假体植入即刻乳房重建扩大了假体植入乳房重建的手术适应证,是一种值得推广的手术方式.     

乳腺癌保留乳头乳晕切除即刻乳房重建术后患者生活质量的评价

目的:观察分析保留乳头乳晕乳腺切除术后即刻假体乳房重建术患者的美容效果和生活质量。方法:回顾性分析陕西省人民医院2015年5月至2016年9月收治并行保留乳头乳晕乳腺切除术后即刻假体乳房重建组（20例）与乳腺切除+前哨淋巴结活检术组（20例）的乳腺癌患者临床病理资料，术后就乳房重建的美容效果及随访1年生活质量等数据进行组间比较。结果:两组的平均年龄、TNM分期及文化程度等资料差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；随访1年两组生活质量通过乳腺癌患者生命质量测定量表评价结果表明，重建组在社会/家庭状况、情感状况、功能状况、附加关注方面的得分均高于对照组，重建组显著优于对照组（P＜0.05）；而在生理状况评分方面无明显差异。结论:保留乳头乳晕乳腺切除术后即刻假体乳房重建术较乳腺切除+前哨淋巴结活检手术具有创伤小、效果良好、外形美观、生活质量高等优势，值得临床推广。     

乳腺癌改良根治术后即刻乳房再造不同方法的临床应用

目的:探讨乳腺癌改良根治术后即刻乳房再造不同方法的适应证、手术方法及优缺点.方法:本组37例乳腺癌患者,分别采用横形腹直肌肌皮瓣带蒂转移、腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣吻合血管游离移植、背阔肌肌皮瓣带蒂转移、单纯乳房假体置入以及不同方法相结合进行术后即刻乳房再造.结果:除2例单纯TRAM皮瓣患者近腋窝皮瓣局部坏死,1例TRAM+DIEP联合皮瓣患者下腹正中局部皮瓣脂肪液化外,余34例皮瓣全部成活,形态满意.随访5个月-10年,无腹部薄弱或腹壁疝等并发症,患者生活质量均得到提高.结论:乳腺癌术后即刻再造安全可行,不同的方法各有优缺点,应根据患者具体情况选择适合患者本人的方法进行乳房再造.     

保留皮肤的乳腺癌改良根治术后即时乳房再造15例

目的探讨一种既达到肿瘤根治性切除,又保留乳房美观外形的乳房再造的手术方法。方法对早期乳腺癌,保留乳房皮肤,切除乳腺组织和腋窝淋巴结。应用下腹部横行腹直肌肌皮瓣或扩大背阔肌肌皮瓣即时乳房再造。结果应用下腹部横行腹直肌肌皮瓣乳房再造10例,扩大背阔肌肌皮瓣再造5例。优11例（73．3％）,良4例（26．7％）。结论保留皮肤乳腺癌根治术后即时乳房再造,切口隐蔽,再造乳房形态效果好。对早期乳腺癌患者是一种安全可行的治疗方法。     

Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer.

AIMS: The oncological, surgical and cosmetic results, patient satisfaction and psychological morbidity of immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer were evaluated. METHODS: From 1980 to 1994, 79 immediate breast reconstructions were performed in Malm?. From 1985 immediate breast reconstruction was performed in 21% of mastectomies among patients 相似文献   

Short-term outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction using an implant or tissue expander after mastectomy in breast cancer patients

Background

Mastectomy is an optional surgical management of breast cancer, but it can cause significant adverse reactions. Breast reconstruction is a concern in post-mastectomy recovery. We assessed the oncologic safety and patient satisfaction following immediate breast reconstruction using an implant or tissue expander.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent reconstruction with an implant or tissue expander immediately after mastectomy. Seventy-seven patients underwent breast reconstruction at a general hospital breast cancer center from January 2008 to December 2010. Fourteen patients were excluded due to loss at follow-up, so 63 patients were included in this study. Questionnaires were sent to all patients to assess patient satisfaction.

Results

Mean age was 44.1 years (range 29–64). After a median follow-up period of 22.4 months, there was 1 case of locoregional recurrence, 1 case of distant metastasis, and an overall breast cancer-specific survival of 100 %. Overall rate of major complications, such as nipple areolar complex (NAC) necrosis and implant removal, was 11.1 % (7 patients). Of the 10 patients who had NAC necrosis, 6 patients improved after observation and 4 patients had NAC excision. Three patients had their implant removed due to severe infection, leakage, and dissatisfaction, respectively. There were 32 cases of total mastectomy (TM), 12 cases of skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM), and 19 cases of NAC-sparing mastectomy (NSM). According to the questionnaire, 84.1 % were satisfied with the general operational result and 77.8 % with the cosmetic result. Of the 31 patients who received conservative surgery, 87.1 % were satisfied with the general result and 83.9 % with the cosmetic result.

Conclusions

Immediate breast reconstruction using an implant after mastectomy was technically feasible and oncologically safe. In addition, the reconstruction resulted in a relatively high rate of patient satisfaction. Further long-term studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

     

乳腺癌改良根治术同期假体植入重建乳房

目的探讨乳腺癌行改良根治术后，同期硅胶假体植入重建乳房的可行性。方法2005年6月至2006年9月，对20例Ⅰ、Ⅱ期乳腺癌患者行保留皮肤的乳腺癌改良根治术后，同期于胸大、小肌间植入硅胶假体重建乳房，并根据冰冻切片检查结果决定是否保留乳头乳晕复合体。结果20例患者客观评价效果优良和尚好者达95％，主观评价效果优良和尚好者达100％。其中有6例保留乳头乳晕复合体。术后随访3～18个月，所有病例均无局部复发和远处转移，无明显术后并发症。结论保留皮肤的乳腺癌改良根治术后用硅胶假体行一期乳房重建，能达到满意的乳房美容效果，是治疗早期乳腺癌安全可行的方法。     

The effect of radiotherapy on the use of immediate breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Immediate breast reconstruction techniques include tissue-expansion, latissimus dorsi flap with or without an implant, pedicled TRAM flap and free tissue-transfer. Adjuvant radiotherapy decreases loco-regional recurrence and increases overall survival. Radiotherapy in the presence of a tissue-expander or an implant can lead to an increased number of complications and poor cosmetic outcome. AIM OF THE STUDY: To study the relationship between radiotherapy and the choice of the immediate breast reconstruction technique in view of the increased number of breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An audit of 121 patients who had immediate breast reconstruction over a period of 2 years was reviewed retrospectively. In March 1998, the radiotherapy protocol was revised. Forty-two patients operated on between January 1997 and March 1998 were compared to 79 patients operated on between April 1998 and June 1999. RESULTS: The percentage of patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy increased in the second period as well as the proportion of autologous breast reconstruction. A small percentage of patients required unexpected radiotherapy after insertion of tissue expanders, due to narrow excision margins or unexpected pathology. Only two patients had tissue-expansion although radiotherapy was likely. CONCLUSION: The choice of the immediate breast reconstruction technique was satisfactory in most patients. The use of implants is best avoided in patients who may require adjuvant radiotherapy. Autologous immediate breast reconstruction, either free or pedicled flaps, is a safer choice for those patients.     

IMMEDIATE BREAST RECONSTRUCTION WITH LATISSIMUS DORSI MUSCULOCUTANEOUS FLAP： A SUITABLE OPTION FOR CHINESE WOMEN AFTER MASTECTOMY

Objective： To discuss the suitable immediate breast reconstruction modalities for Chinese patients by comparing the pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocytaneous flap （TRAM） reconstruction with latissimus dorsi myocytaneous flap （LTD） reconstruction plus implants or not after mastectomy due to breast cancer. Methods： From Jan. 2000 to Jul. 2005, 74 staged 0-II patients （mean age 39） were performed immediate breast reconstruction with autologous tissue either using LTD flaps or pedicled TRAM flaps with supplemental implants when necessary after mastectomy due to breast cancer and the charts were reviewed. Results： The age, marriage and menses status did not affect the selection of modalities and the need of implants. In 74 patients, 62 cases （83.8%） were performed LTD reconstruction with 13 implants and 12 cases received TRAM with 1 implant. The difference in need of implants or not between the two modalities had no statistical significance （P=0.442, Fisher＇ exact test）. Aesthetic results judged as good or fair were in 88% patients and the cosmetic effects between LTD and TRAM groups or implant and non-implant groups had no differences. All reconstructions were successful, with 4.1% cumulative locoregional recurrence and 100% overall survival by following up to 66 months （median 9 months）. The DFS and RFS between the two modalities had no significant differences by log rank test. Conclusion： Immediate autologous tissue reconstruction makes it possible to regain the natural and symmetric contour of breast without increased local recurrence. The LTD flap reconstruction is a suitable option for most Chinese women as well as the pedicled TRAM flap.     

Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: patient satisfaction and clinical outcome

Background Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) followed by immediate reconstruction has been advocated as an effective treatment option for patients with early-stage breast carcinoma. It minimizes deformity and improves cosmesis through preservation of the natural skin envelope of the breast. The purpose of this study was to evaluate postoperative morbidity, patients' satisfaction, and oncological safety for SSM and immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) with a latissimus dorsi (LD) myocutaneous flap and/or breast prosthesis in patients with operable breast cancer. Methods Twenty-one consecutive patients with operable breast cancer undergoing 25 SSM and immediate reconstruction with an LD flap plus implant (n = 14) or implant alone (n = 11) were retrospectively studied (from 2001 through 2005). The median patients' age was 44 years (range, 30–68). Patient satisfaction with the outcome of surgery was assessed using a detailed questionnaire including a linear visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (not satisfied) to 10 (most satisfied). Eight of 20 (40%) patients required adjuvant chemotherapy, and only 2 patients required post-mastectomy radiation. Reconstruction of the nipple–areola complex was performed in 7 patients (33%) using the trefoil local flap technique. Contralateral procedures to achieve symmetry were performed in 6 (28%) patients (5 augmentations and 1 reduction mammoplasty). Results Histological analysis showed pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in 4 patients and invasive carcinoma (+/− DCIS) in 20 cases, of which 5 (25%) were node positive. One prophylactic mastectomy in a BRCA-2 carrier was negative for malignancy. Tumor size ranged from 5 to 90 mm. The surgical margins were clear in all cases. There was no delay in time to commencement of adjuvant therapies. After a mean follow-up period of 13.5 months (range, 5–46 months), none of the patients developed locoregional recurrence. Only 1 patient (5%) developed systemic recurrence (bony metastases). Overall survival was 100%. The incidence of flap necrosis/loss, implant loss, wound infection, or hematoma requiring surgical evacuation was 0%, 0%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. Capsule formation requiring capsulotomy was observed in 3 of 21 patients (14%). The median patient satisfaction score was 10 (range, 6–10). Conclusion SSM and IBR for operable breast cancer is associated with a high level of patient satisfaction and low morbidity. The procedure seems to be oncologically safe, even in patients with high-risk (T3 or node-positive) carcinoma. The latter needs to be confirmed with greater numbers of patients and longer follow-up.     

Clinical outcome of immediate breast reconstruction using a silicone gel-filled implant after nipple-preserving mastectomy

In order to evaluate the safety of silicone gel-filled implants for breast reconstruction in terms of cancer control, we reviewed 122 patients with postoperative stage I and II breast cancer who were treated by nipple-preserving mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction using a silicone implant, and compared them with 92 controls treated by nipple-preserving mastectomy alone. Twelve complications requiring surgical management occurred in the 122 reconstructions (9.8%). Two implants were replaced, and 10 implants were removed. These 10 cases were excluded from survival analysis. The mean follow-up duration was 78 months in the 112 patients with breast reconstruction, and 55 months in the controls. There were no significant differences in the overall, disease-free, and locoregional disease-free survival rates between the two groups. In the reconstruction group, recurrence occurred in 14 patients. Five of them had locoregional recurrence alone, and are surviving free of disease following local resection. By the last follow-up, there was no incidence of secondary cancer at any site, including the contralateral breast cancer or connective tissue disease in the both group.