首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 203 毫秒
1.
了解广州市城区中学生饮食行为模式及其影响因素,为中学生营养教育和营养干预提供科学依据.方法 依托广州市中小学生常规体检工作,对城区27所学校的初一和高一学生及其家长进行问卷调查,收集饮食行为等资料.采用探索性因子分析方法 建立中学生饮食行为模式,采用多因素无序多分类Logistic回归模型分析影响因素.结果 因子分析得到3种饮食行为模式:模式Ⅰ (37.09%)属于健康饮食行为模式,模式Ⅱ(33.37%)和模式Ⅲ(29.54%)属于西式饮食行为模式.Logistic回归模型分析结果显示,住校(ORⅡ=1.57,95%CI=1.33~1.85;ORⅢ=1.28,95%CI=1.07~ 1.52)、视屏时间≥2 h/d(ORⅡ =2.89,95%CI=2.51~3.33;ORⅢ =2.14,95%CI=1.85~2.48)与模式Ⅱ和Ⅲ呈正关联;家庭人均月收入≥5000元(ORⅢ=1.31,95%CI=1.14~1.51)与模式Ⅲ呈正关联;高中生(ORⅡ =0.83,95%CI=0.73~0.95;ORⅢ =0.74,95%CI=0.64~0.85)、父母为大专及以上文化程度(父ORⅡ=0.64,95%CI=0.52 ~ 0.79;母ORⅡ=0.67,95%CI=0.54~0.82;父ORⅢ =0.72,95%CI=0.58~0.90;母ORⅢ=0.73,95%CI=0.59 ~ 0.89)与模式Ⅱ和Ⅲ呈负关联.结论 广州市城区中学生存在3种饮食行为模式,父母文化程度、视屏时间、年级、住校情况、家庭人均月收入是中学生饮食行为模式的主要影响因素.  相似文献   

2.
目的近年来我国青少年吸烟行为的发生呈上升趋势,不同类型学校中,高职院校学生吸烟率较高。家庭是人生的"第一课堂",对青少年行为习惯的养成发挥着重要的作用。本研究通过调查湘西地区高职院校学生吸烟行为现状,分析不同家庭因素对学生吸烟行为的影响,为相关部门制定湘西地区高职院校学生控烟政策提供科学依据。方法于2017-10采用分层整群抽样调查方法,选取湘西地区3所高职院校共1 241名学生进行健康相关行为问卷调查,内容包括学生基本信息、父母职业、父母文化程度和家庭类型等。学生吸烟行为发生组间比较采用χ~2检验,学生吸烟行为的影响因素分析采用非条件Logistic回归分析。结果湘西地区高职院校学生尝试过吸烟、目前吸烟、经常吸烟的比例分别为51.81%、36.66%和26.59%,其中男生各项比例均高于女生,均P<0.05。少数民族学生的尝试过吸烟的比例高于汉族学生,城镇学生经常吸烟的比例高于农村学生,差异均有统计学意义,均P<0.05。Logistic回归分析显示,男生(OR=2.215,95%CI为1.736~2.828,P<0.001)、留守学生(OR=1.438,95%CI为1.127~1.835,P=0.004)是学生目前吸烟的危险因素,母亲管教严格(OR=0.478,95%CI为0.255~0.898,P=0.022)、母亲职业固定职业或经商(OR=0.706,95%CI为0.517~0.964,P=0.028)、核心家庭(OR=0.677,95%CI为0.501~0.914,P=0.011)是学生目前吸烟的保护因素。结论湘西地区高职院校学生吸烟行为比例较高,家庭因素对学生吸烟有一定影响,相关部门应尽快对学生开展控烟健康教育工作。  相似文献   

3.
了解无锡市青少年尝试吸烟行为现况及影响因素,为开展学校控烟工作提供科学依据.方法 2012年10月对整群随机抽取的无锡市2 467名中小学生进行匿名自填式吸烟知识行为问卷调查.结果 学生自报有尝试吸烟行为的比例为5.11%,男生高于女生,高年级学生高于低年级学生,差异均有统计学意义(x2值分别为21.006,10.507,P值均<0.05).126名尝试吸烟的学生中,第一次尝试吸烟年龄主要分布在7岁(27.78%)和14~ 15岁(20.63%),第一次尝试吸烟的场所主要在自己家里(61.86%)和社交场所(18.64%),第一支烟的来源主要为父母给的(44.07%)、自己偷偷拿的(27.73%)和校外朋友给的(22.03%).尝试吸烟行为的危险因素是男生(OR=2.90,95%CI=1.88~4.46)、高年级(初中OR=3.80,95%CI=1.86~7.76;高中OR=10.84,95%CI=5.21 ~22.57;高职OR=13.44,95%CI=6.28 ~ 28.77)、父亲和(或)母亲吸烟(OR=1.52,95%CI=1.01~2.30)、校园内有人吸烟(OR=2.46,95%CI=1.50~4.04)、曾经买过烟(OR=13.71,95%CI=6.50~28.93)和不知晓吸烟危害(OR=2.87,95%CI=1.18~7.00).结论 青少年缺乏吸烟危害相关知识、生活环境中广泛存在的吸烟文化和宽松的吸烟环境是促成学生发生尝试吸烟行为的影响因素.除了向青少年普及烟草危害,还应教育家长减少孩子接触烟草的机会,落实学校无烟政策.  相似文献   

4.
目的 了解湖南省双亲留守儿童遭受校园欺凌现况及其影响因素。方法 于2018年4—7月,在湖南省采用多阶段分层整群抽样方法抽取1 506名双亲留守儿童作为研究对象,采用Olweus欺凌问卷进行匿名问卷调查。结果 湖南省双亲留守儿童遭受、实施校园欺凌检出率分别为20.39%和5.64%,遭受言语欺凌为湖南省双亲留守儿童最常见受欺凌类型(17.60%)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,男生(OR=2.116,95%CI=1.471~3.045)、经常玩暴力游戏(OR=1.624,95%CI=1.040~2.536)、很少或从未与外出父母联系(OR=1.528,95%CI=1.066~2.189)、父母或主要监护人经常相互吵架(OR=3.127,95%CI=1.659~5.895)、无学校安全感(OR=1.876,95%CI=1.290~2.728)、感知班级氛围不和谐(OR=1.604,95%CI=1.138~2.261)是双亲留守儿童校园遭受欺凌的危险因素。结论 湖南省双亲留守儿童遭受校园欺凌情况较为普遍,校园欺凌的预防和干预应从个人、家庭、学校多个层面提出针对性措施。  相似文献   

5.
目的 了解我国青少年不良饮食行为情况和影响因素,为采取针对性的营养干预措施提供科学依据。方法 采用中国教育追踪调查2014—2015学年的追踪数据共10 750名八年级学生进行分析。数据分析组间比较选择χ2 检验,不良饮食行为的影响因素分析采用多元logistic回归模型。结果 青少年经常或总是饮用含糖/碳酸饮料的报告率为21.36%,而经常或总是食用油炸/烧烤食品的报告率为14.60%。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,青少年含糖/碳酸饮料消费行为的危险因素包括家庭经济情况(富裕:OR = 1.538,95%CI: 1.258~1.882,P<0.001)、父亲经常醉酒(OR = 1.530,95%CI: 1.308~1.789,P<0.001)、母亲的受教育水平(初中或高中:OR = 1.237,95%CI: 1.076~1.422,P<0.01)、父亲的受教育水平(初中或高中:OR = 1.189,95%CI: 1.011~1.397,P<0.05)、与朋友外出运动、看电影(一年或半年一次:OR = 1.146,95%CI: 1.016~1.294,P<0.05; 每月或每周一次:OR = 1.786,95%CI: 1.562~2.043,P<0.001;每周一次以上:OR = 2.327,95%CI: 1.791~3.024,P<0.001);保护因素包括女性(OR = 0.746,95%CI: 0.672~0.829,P<0.001)、与父母吃晚饭(一年或半年一次:OR = 0.601,95%CI: 0.412~0.878,P<0.01;每周一次以上:OR = 0.696,95%CI: 0.495~0.979,P<0.05)、自评整体健康情况(一般:OR = 0.783,95%CI: 0.641~0.956,P<0.05;比较好/很好:OR = 0.652,95%CI: 0.539~0.790,P<0.001)。青少年油炸/烧烤食品消费行为的危险因素包括女性(OR = 1.187,95%CI: 1.054~1.335,P<0.01)、家庭经济情况(富裕:OR = 1.377,95%CI: 1.093~1.735,P<0.01)、父亲经常醉酒(OR = 1.684,95%CI: 1.417~2.001,P<0.001)、与朋友外出运动、看电影(每月或每周一次:OR = 1.706, 95%CI: 1.454~2.001, P<0.001;每周一次以上:OR = 2.783,95%CI: 2.126~3.644,P<0.001);保护因素包括与父母吃晚饭(每周一次以上:OR = 0.673,95%CI: 0.461~0.981,P<0.05)、自评整体健康情况(一般:OR = 0.788,95%CI: 0.634~0.980,P<0.05,比较好/很好:OR = 0.579,95%CI: 0.469~0.714,P<0.001)。结论 青少年不良饮食行为不仅受到个体因素影响,还与一系列家庭或社会因素密切相关。家庭、学校以及青少年本人应该多方合作,实施综合干预,提高青少年健康素养并促进其养成健康饮食习惯。  相似文献   

6.
目的了解上海市小学4年级至初中2年级不同户籍学生的吸烟状况及相关因素。方法对上海市8所学校的2312名学生及家长进行问卷调查。结果8.0%的学生自报曾有尝试吸烟,2. 6%的学生自报现在吸烟。外地农村户籍初中生的尝试吸烟率、现在吸烟率均高于上海户籍初中生(P 0.001)。多元Logistic回归分析,有同学吸烟(OR=3. 624,95%CI:2.218~5. 920)、家庭功能严重障碍(OR=2. 614,95%CI:1.623~4.210)、外地户籍(与上海户籍相比,外地城镇户籍OR=2. 039, 95%CI:1.190~3.493,外地农村户籍OR=2.048, 95%CI:1.338~3. 136)是尝试吸烟的危险因素。有同学吸烟(OR=7. 403,95%CI:3.788~14. 469)、家庭功能中度及严重障碍(与家庭功能良好相比,家庭功能中度障碍OR=2. 179, 95%CI:1.036~4.583,家庭功能严重障碍OR=3.806, 95%CI:1.705-8.500)是现在吸烟的危险因素。结论建议将进城务工人员随迁子女的吸烟行为作为青少年控烟干预的重点人群,并以在学校开展同伴教育作为主要干预方法。  相似文献   

7.
目的了解青少年吸烟行为现状并探讨压力、人格、社会支持对青少年吸烟行为的影响,为预防和减少青少年吸烟行为提供依据。方法采用青少年生活事件问卷(ALEQ)、简易大五人格量表(NEO-FFI)、领悟社会支持量表(PSSS)、以及自编中学生吸烟行为调查问卷,对湖南省4个地区6所中学2 380名学生进行调查。结果青少年吸烟行为存在性别差异(χ~2=152.52,P0.05)和年级差异(χ~2=84.75,P0.05),男生吸烟率明显高于女生,高年级学生吸烟率明显高于低年级学生;吸烟青少年与不吸烟青少年相比,在压力水平、社会支持及人格的开放性维度及宜人性维度上得分差异均有统计学意义(均P0.05);logistic回归分析结果表明,性别(OR=8.39)、压力(OR=1.02)、社会支持(OR=0.99)、人格的开放性(OR=0.97)、宜人性(OR=0.95)与尽责性(OR=0.96)维度可以较好地预测青少年是否吸烟。结论低社会支持,人格的开放性、宜人性得分低、尽则性得分高的男性青少年在压力情境下吸烟的可能性更高。  相似文献   

8.
目的 分析餐饮工作人员劝阻吸烟的意愿及其影响因素,为改善控烟效果提供参考。方法 采用分层随机整群抽样法,对重庆市主城区了解所在餐饮场所控烟情况的650名工作人员进行问卷调查,通过χ2检验、logistic回归分析其劝阻吸烟意愿的影响因素。结果 449人(74.6%)有劝阻吸烟意愿。Logistic回归分析显示认为劝烟有效(OR否 = 3.965,95%CI:1.665~9.441)、知道条例中劝烟相关规定(OR否 = 2.140,95%CI:1.233~3.716)、期望的工作场所是禁烟场所(OR非禁烟场所 = 5.833,95%CI:3.114~10.926)、认为公共场所吸烟有害他人健康(OR否 = 12.328,95%CI:5.916~25.689)和影响顾客就餐体验(OR否 = 4.090,95%CI:2.097~7.977)、认为吸烟区设置促进其劝烟意愿(OR否 = 2.885,95%CI:1.667~4.994)的人群更愿意劝烟(P<0.05);吸烟(OR不吸烟 = 0.425,95%CI:0.258~0.700)、本单位工作5年以上(OR五年及以内 = 0.320,95%CI:0.193~0.530)和过去有过劝烟行为(OR否 = 0.303,95%CI:0.128~0.713)的人群更不愿意劝烟(P<0.05)。结论 有劝烟意愿者较多,劝烟意愿受人口学特征、主观认知、劝烟行为和客观保障多种因素影响。建议相关部门深入开展公共场所控烟和劝烟认知教育、充分发挥优势人群带动作用、规范设置规范吸烟区和禁烟标识、加大控烟执法和处罚力度、建立严密的社会监督网。  相似文献   

9.
目的了解高中生吸烟现状及青春期发育、感觉寻求、冲动性对其吸烟的影响。方法采用青春期发育事件自评量表、吸烟行为问卷、冲动性和感觉寻求量表对重庆市某区2所中学的1675名学生进行问卷调查。结果高中生的吸烟率为14.4%;高中男生和女生吸烟比例差异有统计学意义(χ~2=54.722,P0.001),男生吸烟比例为21.9%,女生吸烟比例为9%。不同性别高中生的青春期发育差异有统计学意义(t=-11.12,P0.001),女生发育水平高于男生(女生:15.92±1.70;男生:14.82±2.34)。不同性别高中生的冲动性差异有统计学意义(t=3.33,P0.01),男生得分高于女生(女生:3.39±1.87;男生:3.71±1.89)。感觉寻求差异无统计学意义(t=1.64,P0.05)。高中生的感觉寻求会影响其吸烟(女生:OR=1.28,95%CI:1.16~1.41;男生:OR=1.28,95%CI:1.18~1.39,P均0.001),感觉寻求高的学生更倾向于吸烟。女生青春期发育会影响其吸烟(OR=0.84,95%CI:0.72~0.98,P0.05),青春期发育程度低的女生更倾向于吸烟;男生青春期发育不影响其吸烟(OR=1.08,95%CI:0.99~1.18,P0.05)。高中生的冲动性不影响其吸烟(女生:OR=0.93,95%CI:0.93~1.22;男生:OR=0.98,95%CI:0.88~1.09,P均0.05)。结论感觉寻求是影响高中生吸烟的因素之一,我们应该关注该人格特质,引导高中生感觉寻求人格特质的健康发展。  相似文献   

10.
目的 了解武汉市从不吸烟中学生二手烟暴露水平,分析相关影响因素,为制订控烟政策提供科学依据。方法 采用横断面研究设计、多阶段分层整群随机抽样方法,对武汉市在校从不吸烟中学生进行自填纸质问卷调查。采用多因素logistic回归模型分析二手烟暴露的影响因素。结果 武汉市从不吸烟中学生共10 398人,在家中、学校和公共场所二手烟暴露率分别为26.28%、36.94%和51.08%。多因素logistic回归分析显示,父母吸烟的从不吸烟中学生在家中暴露于二手烟的可能性是父母不吸烟者的13.95倍(OR=13.95,95%CI:11.91~16.33);在学校看到过老师吸烟的从不吸烟中学生在学校暴露于二手烟的可能性是未见过者的7.15倍(OR=7.15,95%CI:5.89~8.68);在学校看到过老师吸烟的从不吸烟中学生在公共场所暴露于二手烟的可能性是未见过者的2.69倍(OR=2.69,95%CI:2.28~3.17)。结论 武汉市从不吸烟中学生二手烟暴露水平较高。在公共场所制定无烟法律、在公共场所和互联网全面禁止烟草广告、加强无烟学校政策的实施和监督、推广无烟家庭规则、加强父母和学生吸烟...  相似文献   

11.
目的 了解广州市城区小学二年级学生的家庭在外就餐现状及其影响因素,并分析其与儿童超重肥胖的关系。方法 抽取广州市12所小学的二年级学生2 206名,进行问卷调查和体格检查。应用logistic回归模型分析家庭在外就餐的影响因素及其与儿童超重肥胖的关系。结果 学生家庭在外就餐≥1次/周者占53.99%。多因素分析显示,独生子女家庭比非独生子女家庭有更高的可能性在外就餐(OR = 1.45,95% CI:1.18~1.78,P<0.001)。与家庭人均月收入<5 000元的家庭相比,收入高的家庭在外就餐的可能性更高(家庭人均月收入为5 000~9 999元:OR = 1.60,95% CI:1.21~2.13,P = 0.001;≥10 000元:OR = 2.22,95% CI:1.68~2.94,P<0.001)。类似,与父母文化程度为高中及以下的家庭相比,父母文化程度为大专或本科的家庭有更高的在外就餐可能性(OR = 1.87,95% CI:1.44~2.43,P<0.001)。而中等营养知识得分的家长较得分高的家长有减少带孩子外出就餐的倾向(OR = 0.75,95% CI:0.59~0.95,P = 0.016)。此外,家庭在外就餐与儿童超重肥胖风险增高存在统计学关联(OR = 1.31,95% CI:1.03~1.67,P = 0.032)。结论 广州市城区小学二年级学生家庭在外就餐现象较为普遍。独生子女家庭、家庭收入和父母文化程度和营养知识水平是家庭在外就餐的影响因素。家庭在外就餐可能会增加儿童超重肥胖的风险。  相似文献   

12.
OBJECTIVE: Studies in other countries have shown that school tobacco control policy has potential to prevent smoking uptake in adolescents. Since no Canadian research has studied this association, we assessed the statistical link between school tobacco policy and smoking status in Ontario elementary and secondary schools. METHODS: We conducted secondary analysis of data collected using the School Smoking Profile, a cross-sectional, self-report questionnaire. School policy variables were formed from five survey items concerning students' perceptions of school tobacco control policy. Smoking status was determined through self-report measures which had been validated by carbon monoxide testing. Logistic regression models used school policy variables to explain smoking status in elementary and secondary schools, controlling for school location, school size, and student's grade level. RESULTS: The smoking policy variables, rules and enforcement, explained smoking status after controlling for other variables. In elementary schools, perceptions of stronger enforcement reduced the odds of being a smoker (OR = 0.39, CI99 = 0.34-0.44). In secondary schools, enforcement lost its protective effect (OR = 1.05, CI99 = 1.00-1.10). In addition, student perceptions that rules were strong were indicative of increased smoking in secondary schools (OR = 1.32, CI99 = 1.27-1.37). DISCUSSION: Strong enforcement of school tobacco control policy appears to be effective in elementary schools but is not as helpful in secondary schools. Secondary school policymakers should consider modifying their sanctions to avoid alienating smokers.  相似文献   

13.
目的 探讨江苏省医学生酒精滥用的危险因素,为制订减少有害使用酒精策略提供参考依据.方法 以江苏省医学生酒精滥用现况调查中319例酒精滥用者作为病例组,按照1:2匹配同性别、专业、年级的对照组638人.采用SPSS 22.0软件进行单因素和多因素条件Logistic回归分析模型分析.结果 江苏省医学生饮酒率为44.59%...  相似文献   

14.
了解贵州省中等职业学校学生非医疗目的用药现状及其影响因素,为指导学生科学就医、合理用药提供参考.方法 采用多阶段分层随机整群抽样方法,抽取贵州省3 073名职业中学学生,采用自评式问卷调查用药情况.结果 职业中学学生非医疗目的用药报告率为11.88%.职中学生用药报告率不同性别、民族、年级、是否住校、吸烟、饮酒、每月零花钱、自杀意念、学习压力、家庭经济状况间差异均有统计学意义(P值均<0.05).二分类Logistic回归分析显示,住校(OR=1.768,95%CI=1.214~2.576)、每月零花钱≥500元(OR=2.407,95%CI=1.520~ 3.813)、吸烟(OR=1.676,95%CI=1.252~ 2.243)、有自杀意念(OR=1.709,95%CI=1.257~2.324)、家庭经济困难(OR=4.119,95%CI=1.150~ 14.750)或中等(OR=4.149,95%CI=1.238 ~ 13.907)是学生用药的危险因素,职中二年级(OR=0.448,95% CI=0.334~0.602)是学生用药的保护因素.结论 职业中学学生非医疗目的用药报告率相对较高,应加强对职中学生进行安全用药健康教育.  相似文献   

15.
OBJECTIVE: Factors correlated with cigarette smoking in young people have yet to be documented in most developing countries. This study assesses the correlates of smoking in Mexican young people. METHODS: School-based, cross-sectional study in the central Mexican state of Morelos during the 1998-1999 school year of 13,293 public school students aged 11 to 24 years. Multinomial logistic regression models were constructed with smoking as the dependent variable. RESULTS: Regular smoking (one or more cigarettes daily) prevalence was 13.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]=12.2-13.9) in males, and 6.1% (95% CI=5.6-6.6) in females. Frequent alcohol intoxication was strongly associated with regular smoking (females, odds ratio [OR]=68.5, 95% CI=37.6-125.2; males, OR=34.5, 95% CI=22.6-52.7). Regular smoking was associated with illegal drug use and smoking by both parents in females, and with illegal drug use in males (males, OR=4.9, 95% CI=3.7-6.5). Also associated with tobacco smoking were high socioeconomic status, low academic achievement, illegal drug use by peers, marijuana use by parents, and depression in adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: This study documents a strong correlation between tobacco smoking and other health risk behaviors, especially alcohol and drug abuse. In young women especially, the risk of tobacco use increased with alcohol abuse and higher socioeconomic status. School-based interventions are needed that focus on preventing smoking and also take into account other unhealthy behaviors.  相似文献   

16.
目的了解广州市大学生戒烟情况及影响因素。方法采用分层随机整群抽样的方法,于2012年5月对广州市6所大学1~4年级学生进行问卷调查,采用多因素非条件Logistic回归分析戒烟的影响因素。结果共调查11593人,戒烟人数360,戒烟率33.77%;女性戒烟率(43.24%)高于男性(32.24%);家庭平均月收入、学生月生活费及父亲文化程度越高,学生戒烟率越低;城职户籍学生戒烟率低于农村户籍;多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示戒烟的影响因素为:性别(OR=0.362,959CI:0.240—0.547)、学校(OR医学类与理工类=5.275,95%CI:2.872~9.689)、月生活费(OR〈500与〉12000=7.115,95%CI:2.538~19.945)、户籍(OR本省外市与本市=1.597,95%CI:1.044~2.442)、吸烟知识(OR=1.407,95%CI:1.047~1.891)、压力(OR无与中、重=0.503,95%CI:0.278~0.912)。结论吸烟大学生戒烟与否受多种客观因素的影响,需要社会、学校和家长联合对大学生开展控烟宣传教育以及加强管理工作,促使吸烟学生尽早改变吸烟行为。  相似文献   

17.
This cross-sectional study aimed to assess smoking prevention and cessation education delivered as part of the UK National Curriculum and to evaluate the relative effectiveness of health, social influence and other/non-health components. In all, 1789 students aged 11-15 from 12 secondary schools completed online surveys assessing smoking status, factors known to be related to smoking and experience of smoking education. A total of 1421 of 1722 (83%) students remembered some school-based education. Of these, 803 (57%) said that the lessons changed their ideas about smoking. Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess whether lesson recall was associated with smoking status in a model adjusting for age, gender, ethnicity, family and best friend smoking status, socioeconomic status, and school. Quitters were more likely than smokers to report having changed their ideas about smoking as a result of a lesson (OR 5.78, 95% CI 2.44-13.72). The relative effectiveness of 16 lesson themes was assessed. Significantly more students changed their ideas about smoking as a result of 'health' compared with 'social influence' (chi(2) (1) 124.0, P < 0.001) or 'other/non-health' (chi(2) (1) 63.16, P < 0.001) topics. Mouth cancer was the most effective health topic and may provide a suitable model for both smoking and risky drinking prevention.  相似文献   

18.
This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of a multicomponent Health Promoting Schools (HPS) intervention program in improving self-reported smoking outcomes among a cohort of adolescents in 22 public secondary schools in the Hunter Region of New South Wales, Australia. Pre-test surveys were completed by students in the first 2 years of secondary school, with a 2-year post-test survey. Multivariate analyses examined intervention effect for the main outcome, post-test smoking behavior, controlling for pre-test smoking status, school and other confounders. The sample comprised the cohort of 1852 students who completed both surveys. The results demonstrated that the HPS program failed to improve smoking behavior over the 2 years (equal increase of 10% in both groups). The program was successful in improving smoking knowledge, but not attitudes, in intervention versus control group (P < 0.001). Independent predictors of post-test smoking included: pre-test smoking [odds ratio (OR) = 5.44; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.20-9.28], being female (OR = 0.55; CI = 0.35-0.87), having more close friends who smoked (OR = 1.42; CI = 1.33-1.52), peer group having no clear opinion about smoking (OR = 3.23; CI = 1.27-8.27), having more positive and less negative attitudes towards smoking, and being less involved in school activities. We discuss methodological issues in multicomponent community-based interventions, and highlight the strengths and limitations of this study.  相似文献   

19.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between the socioeconomic status and dental caries, gingivitis and fluorosis among Brazilian school children. METHODS: One thousand students aged 12 from private and public schools were examined. The indexes used were DMFT or S (Decayed, Missing and Filled Teeth or Surfaces Index), BI (Bleeding Index), and TFI (Thylstrup and Feyerskov Index). The socioeconomic level was determined according family income and parents' educational level. RESULTS: Parents' educational level data revealed a strong Pearson's correlation with income. No correlation was observed between dental caries prevalence, gingivitis and fluorosis and the studied social economic variables. The DMFT in private schools was 1.54+/-2.02, and in public schools was 2.48+/-2.51. BI was 14.7%+/-12.7% in private schools and 21.7%+/- 17.9% in public ones. The prevalence of fluorosis was 60.8% and 49.9%, respectively). These differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). Individuals with a larger number of decayed surfaces and the ones with a larger percent of bleeding surfaces were seen in public schools. CONCLUSIONS: The socioeconomic level variables, income and parents' educational level, did not correlate with the events analyzed in the study. Other socioeconomic variables probably contributed to the observed differences between students from private and public schools.  相似文献   

20.
  目的  了解2012-2016年重庆市居民健康素养水平变化趋势,探讨健康素养水平的影响因素,为卫生相关政策的改进提供科学依据。  方法  2012-2016年采用分层多阶段随机抽样方法对重庆市居民进行问卷调查。  结果  2012-2016年重庆市居民健康素养水平分别是4.94%、8.38%、8.71%、10.16%和11.82%;多因素分析显示,女性(OR=1.018,95% CI:1.015~1.021,P < 0.001)、25~岁(OR=1.037,95% CI:1.033~1.041,P < 0.001)、35~岁(OR=1.143,95% CI:1.139~1.148,P < 0.001)、小学(OR=2.065,95% CI:2.044~2.087,P < 0.001)、初中(OR=3.804,95% CI:3.765~3.843,P < 0.001)、高中/职高/中专(OR=6.245,95% CI:6.179~6.311,P < 0.001)、大专/本科及以上(OR=12.305,95% CI:12.173~12.438,P < 0.001)、家庭人均年收入3 000~元(OR=1.570,95% CI:1.560~1.580,P < 0.001)、5 000~元(OR=1.897,95% CI:1.887~1.907,P < 0.001)、10 000~元(OR=1.885,95% CI:1.875~1.896,P < 0.001)及>15 000元(OR=2.097,95% CI:2.086~2.108,P < 0.001)是健康素养的保护因素;农村、45~岁、55~岁及65~岁是健康素养的危险因素(均有P < 0.001)。  结论  2012-2016年重庆市居民健康素养水平呈逐年上升趋势,应针对农村居民、男性和年龄较大者、文化程度较低者和家庭人均年收入较低者进行健康教育工作。  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号