Wound management in perforated appendicitis

Open wound management after perforated appendicitis was common practice but, recently, primary closure has been advocated to reduce costs and morbidity. Hospital records from 319 adults who underwent appendectomy from 1993 to 1996 were reviewed to identify surgical wound infections (SWIs) and examine risk factors. Information about age, length of stay (LOS), operative time, white blood cell count, and antibiotic administration were obtained. Perforation was either noted at operation or identified microscopically by the pathologist. If primary wound closure was performed, patients with acute appendicitis and perforation had a 4-fold higher readmission rate, a 5-fold increase in SWI, and twice the LOS compared with patients with acute appendicitis without perforation. Patients with grossly perforated acute appendicitis had no difference in LOS if the wound was treated open or closed primarily. No patient with microscopic perforation and primary wound closure developed SWI. Primary wound closure after acute appendicitis was safe in the absence of clinical perforation. In the presence of clinical appendiceal perforation the wound should be left open.     

Incidence of Acute Nonperforated and Perforated Appendicitis: Age-specific and Sex-specific Analysis

n = 544 (37%)] were analyzed with regard to prehospitalization duration of symptoms and in-hospital observation time. The crude incidence of acute appendicitis was 86 per 100,000 per year. Although the incidence of nonperforated appendicitis was highest among adolescents and young adults (13–40 years of age), perforated appendicitis occurred at almost the same incidence in all sex and age groups. The diagnostic accuracy was 76%. Perforated appendicitis occurred in 19%, with higher rates in small children and the elderly, irrespective of gender. A high diagnostic accuracy was not associated with an increased rate of perforation. In small children and the elderly, the diagnostic accuracy was low and the perforation rate high. Patients with perforation had a significantly longer duration of symptoms as well as in-hospital observation time than did patients with nonperforated appendicitis. Perforated appendicitis showed a different incidence pattern than nonperforated appendicitis and was associated with a significantly longer duration of symptoms and in-hospital observation time, probably due to patient-related factors. We suggest this observation deserves attention regarding clinical diagnosis and treatment decision-making for patients with suspected acute appendicitis.     

Appendectomy: a contemporary appraisal.

OBJECTIVE: The authors present an accurate and comprehensive snapshot of appendicitis and the practice of appendectomy in the 1990s. METHODS: Appendectomies were performed on 4950 patients in 147 Department of Defense hospitals worldwide over a 12-month period ending January 31, 1993. RESULTS: The median age was 23 years (range, 6 months to 82 years) with 64% males and 36% females. The patients were assigned a diagnosis of normal appendix in 632 (13%) cases, acute appendicitis in 3286 (66%) cases, and perforated appendicitis in 1032 (21%) cases. There were no differences in perforation and normal appendix rates between those operations performed in teaching hospitals versus community hospitals or between high-volume hospitals (> or = 100 appendectomies/year) versus low-volume hospitals. Both a preoperative temperature > or = 100.5 and a preoperative leukocyte count > or = 10,000 were incapable of discriminating between patients with appendicitis and those with a normal appendix. Multivariate analysis showed a significantly increased risk of perforation associated with age younger than or equal to 8 years (38% vs. 18%) and age older than or equal to 45 years (49% vs. 18%). Females had a significantly higher rate of normal appendices (19% vs. 9%) and a lower rate of perforation (18% vs. 23%). The complication rates to include reoperation and intraabdominal sepsis were markedly increased in those patients with perforation. There were four deaths in this series (0.08%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a marked decline in associated mortality over the past 50 years, rates of perforation and negative appendectomy remain unchanged because they are influenced strongly by factors untouched by the intervening technologic advances.     

A retrospective review of the histopathology and clinicopathologic correlates of appendices removed from patients of acute appendicitis

AIM: Appendicitis is the most common intra-abdominal condition requiring emergency surgery, with a life time risk of about 6%. Although considerable data are available in the literature regarding the histopathology of appendicectomy specimens, such information from the Indian subcontinent remains unreported. METHODS: A total of 348 consecutive appendices removed because of clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis were selected. Three sections from each specimen were submitted for histopathology. Histopathologic acute appendicitis if present was further classified into 3 subcategories. A retrospective analysis was performed on all these specimens. RESULTS: The male female ratio was 2.6:1 with highest number of cases in the age group 21-30 years; 282 specimens out of 348 showed features consistent with acute appendicitis with an overall higher occurrence in males. Statistically significant association was obtained between perforation and male sex, older age and acute suppurative appendicitis. CONCLUSIONS: Present study shows that acute appendicitis in India is a disease of young males. The negative appendicectomy rate is about 10.9%. On further subclassification of acute appendicitis, uncomplicated acute appendicitis seems to be the most common followed by acute suppurative appendicitis.     

Sex differences in the epidemiology, seasonal variation, and trends in the management of patients with acute appendicitis

Background

Acute appendicitis is the most common indication for acute surgical abdominal intervention. In this study, we analyzed the gender correlation with demographic, epidemiologic, diurnal, and seasonal trends in relation to the incidence and management of patients with acute appendicitis in our medical center.

Methods

Data of patients, 18?years of age or older who underwent emergency appendectomies at the Rabin Medical Center during the last 13?years, were collected. The data collected included demographic parameters, hospitalization, procedures, and use of preoperative imaging.

Results

Data were available for 3,736 patients. Males had more appendicitis attacks than females (p?<?0.0001), whereas females had more normal appendixes than males (p?<?0.0001). The overall rate of normal appendixes was 19.6?%, with a decline in the past 10?years from a yearly average of 23.5?% between 1998 and 2002 to 15?% between 2003 and 2007 (p?<?0.0001) with a reverse correlation with the preoperative use of abdominal CT. A distinct seasonal pattern was observed; more appendectomies for acute appendicitis occurred during the summer months (p?<?0.0001). Ten percent of patients had a complicated course with a mortality rate of 0.33?%; most of them were elderly, male/female ratio 0.4.

Conclusions

We found distinct gender, epidemiological, seasonal, and diurnal trends influencing the incidence of acute appendicitis. The incidence rate of false-positive surgery has been gradually declining, probably due to the increased use of preoperative abdominal CT and ultrasound. Acute appendicitis was more common in males and during the summer months.     

Is incidental appendectomy necessary during radical cystectomy?

OBJECTIVE: To find out the incidence of acute appendicitis leading to acute abdominal pain and necessitating appendectomy in the follow-up of patients after radical cystectomy and urinary diversions. METHODS: A prospective 160 consecutive radical cystectomy patients with urinary diversion in whom appendectomy was not done between January 1991 and June 2001 were reviewed for the incidence of acute appendicitis. Ages ranged between 26 and 73 years. There were 143 males and 17 females. 120 patients had ileal conduit, 20 sigmoid neobladder, 5 continent urinary diversion, and 15 ureterosigmoidostomy as urinary diversion. Each patients was followed up regularly till death or last follow-up. The follow-up ranged between 4 months and 10 years (mean 6 years). RESULTS: Intestinal obstruction (11%) and acute pyelonephritis (16%) were the most common causes of acute abdominal pain. The remaining causes include sigmoid neobladder perforation (0.6%), parastomal hernia (0.6%), urinary retention due to mucus (1.8%) and renal colic (1.8%). In all patients, diagnosis was easily made and they were managed accordingly. None of the patients had acute appendicitis requiring appendectomy on follow-up. CONCLUSION: Incidental appendectomy is not required during radical cystectomy as the risk of subsequent appendicitis is extremely low.     

Acute appendicitis in late adulthood: incidence, presentation, and outcome. Results of a prospective multicenter acute abdominal pain study and a review of the literature

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is the second most common cause of surgical abdominal disease in late adulthood. It is a serious condition: major errors in management are made frequently and the condition is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Data collected within a multicenter prospective trial and a literature review were used to analyze diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties in detail. METHODS: In a multicenter intervention study (MEDWIS A 70) data from 2,280 patients with acute abdominal pain were collected prospectively. Patients with histologically proven acute appendicitis, aged 50 years and older (n=102), were compared with younger patients (n=417) to determine differences in presentation, clinical course, and outcome. The basis for the literature review was a Medline search for appendicitis in late adulthood and in the elderly, covering the years 1980-1998. In addition, studies on clinical presentation of acute appendicitis in all age groups were also reviewed and appropriate data were extracted. RESULTS: Patients aged 50 years and older with acute abdominal pain had a significantly higher incidence of surgery. Fourteen percent had acute appendicitis (27% in younger patients), with an increased complication rate (20% vs. 8%) and mortality (3% vs. 0.2%). Significantly more signs and symptoms suggestive of acute abdominal disease and peritonitis were recorded among older patients, reflecting the higher perforation rate (35% vs. 13%). Clinical presentation of appendicitis in younger patients was far more ambiguous. There were no significant differences in outcome between older and younger patients as regards perforations. Perforations are directly associated with treatment delay. Overall delay is a result of late presentation of older patients to hospital and postadmission delay. CONCLUSIONS: Appendicitis in late adulthood is characterized by a delay in treatment, high perforation rates, and unfavorable outcome parameters, all mutually correlating. Older patients with acute abdominal pain are high-risk patients, unlike their younger counterparts. They have to be clinically evaluated by experienced surgeons within a narrow time margin. The problem of late presentation and/or referral should be addressed, perhaps by education of primary care physicians and the public.     

INSURANCE AND THE RISK OF RUPTURED APPENDIX IN THE ADULT

Background : Disparities in medical care related to the insurance status of patients have been reported. A retrospective analysis was performed to examine the insurance-related differences in the risk of appendiceal perforation in the Prince of Wales Hospital (POWH), New South Wales. Methods : Computerized data of 1179 patient years who had a diagnosis of appendicitis and were admitted to the POWH over the preceding 10 years were examined. The outcome measure was appendiceal perforation. Patient variables examined were insurance status, sex, age, and socio-economic status (SES). Three hundred patients over the same period were identified who had an appendicectomy but not appendicitis. Multiple logistic regression and Fisher’s exact test were used for statistical analysis. Results : The overall perforation rate in 1179 patients was 17%. The only factor that was related to an increased risk of perforation was age over 50 years (odds ratio (OR)1.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04–2.53). Sex, insurance status or SES were not associated with a higher risk of perforation. The overall rate of negative appendicectomy was 20% (300 of 1479 patients), and the rate was higher in the uninsured patients (22 vs 17%, P = 0.014, Fisher’s exact test). Conclusions : Lack of health insurance was not associated with an increased incidence of appendiceal perforation at the POWH. Age over 50 years was identified as the only risk factor for appendiceal perforation. The lower negative appendicectomy rate in the insured group may be because of better diagnostic ability of consultants compared to registrars.     

Examining a Common Disease with Unknown Etiology: Trends in Epidemiology and Surgical Management of Appendicitis in California, 1995–2009

Background

The study was designed to examine the epidemiology of appendicitis and risk factors of perforation and appendectomy.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development Patient Discharge Data was performed from 1995 to 2009. Patients with appendicitis were identified by ICD-9 diagnosis code. Population statistics from the RAND Corporation were used to calculate incidence rates. Risk factors of perforation and appendectomy were also calculated.

Results

A total of 608,116 patients with appendicitis (70?% non-perforated) were included. The incidence increased at an average rate of 0.5 cases/100,000 population/year (p?<?0.001), with annual incidence peaking during the third quarter. Children age 10–14 had the highest rates of appendicitis (169.6 cases/100,000). The lifetime cumulative incidence rate is 9.0?%. Appendicitis is most common in whites and Hispanics and less common in African Americans and Asians. Risks of perforation include Hispanic or Asian race, young or old age, and non-private insurance. The adjusted odds of appendectomy increased since 1995 in patients with non-perforated appendicitis (OR 1.5, 95?% CI (1.3–1.7); p?<?0.001), but it decreased in patients with perforated appendicitis (OR 0.4, 95?% CI (0.4–0.5); p?<?0.001).

Conclusions

This is the largest epidemiological study of appendicitis to our knowledge in recent years. Incidence has increased over time and is higher in the summer months. Whites and Hispanics have higher rates of appendicitis, but Hispanics and Asians and patients with non-private insurance, have higher odds of perforation. Surgical management of perforated appendicitis has decreased over time. It is unknown why the incidence has increased, displays seasonality, and varies by race.     

Diagnostic accuracy and perforation rate in appendicitis: association with age and sex of the patient and with appendicectomy rate.

OBJECTIVE: To see if diagnostic accuracy and perforation rate in acute appendicitis is associated with age and sex of the patients and with the appendicectomy rate. DESIGN: Retrospective study of consecutive patients from a defined population. Study of associations between diagnostic accuracy and perforation rate and appendicectomy rate in published reports. SETTING: J?nk?ping county, Sweden. SUBJECTS: 3,029 patients operated on for suspected acute appendicitis from 1984-1989. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Findings at laparotomy for acute appendicitis, confirmed with histological examination in 83% of the cases. RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy was low at the extremes of age and in women (60% compared with 79% in men, p less than 0.001). When all intra-abdominal conditions were considered the percentage of negative laparotomies among women (24%) was twice that among men (12%, p less than 0.001). This difference between the sexes was also seen in nonfertile ages. Perforation rate was higher among men (18% compared with 13%, p less than 0.01) and at extremes of age. According to correlation analysis of published reports the perforation rate is unrelated to either diagnostic accuracy or appendicectomy rate while diagnostic accuracy is inversely associated with the appendicectomy rate. CONCLUSION: A low diagnostic accuracy is a problem mainly at extremes of age and in females. A low appendicectomy rate is associated with a high diagnostic accuracy, while the perforation rate is unaffected. A conservative attitude to exploration therefore seems justified.     

Appendicitis in the elderly

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis in the elderly (i.e. those over 60 years of age) is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. The present retrospective study reviews 10 years ( 1986-1996) of experience and outcome in treating acute appendicitis in patients aged 60 or above. METHODS: One hundred and thirty patients with acute appendicitis were identified and their case notes reviewed. RESULTS: Acute appendicitis was diagnosed at admission in 84 patients (64.6%). The remaining patients were observed for a median duration of 9.4 h prior to diagnosis and treatment. Patients with an underlying perforated acute appendix had a significantly longer period of pain prior to admission (P = 0.029; Mann-Whitney U-test) but perforation per se was not associated with a significantly higher rate of morbidity and longer length of hospital stay. In contrast, the use of midline or paramedian incisions was associated with a higher wound infection rate (P=0.003; Pearson chi-squared test) and a longer hospital stay (P<0.001; Mann Whitney U-test). None of the patients were subsequently found to have an underlying colonic neoplasm. The overall morbidity rate was 28%. The mortality rate was 2.3% and all three patients who died had a severe comorbid medical condition prior to developing acute appendicitis. CONCLUSIONS: Acute appendicitis in the elderly is still associated with significant morbidity. But once acute appendicitis is diagnosed, then expedient surgery, appropriate use of perioperative antibiotics and a right lower quadrant incision can help to minimize the morbidity. Pre-existing severe comorbid medical condition(s) is a major contributory factor to mortality in these patients.     

A Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Appendectomy

Background and Objectives:

To compare laparoscopic appendectomy with traditional open appendectomy.

Methods:

Seventy-one patients requiring operative intervention for suspected acute appendicitis were prospectively compared. Thirty-seven patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy, and 34 had open appendectomy through a right lower quadrant incision. Length of surgery, postoperative morbidity and length of postoperative stay (LOS) were recorded. Both groups were similar with regard to age, gender, height, weight, fever, leukocytosis, and incidence of normal vs. gangrenous or perforated appendix.

Results:

Mean LOS was significantly shorter for patients with acute suppurative appendicitis who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (2.5 days vs. 4.0 days, p<0.01). Mean LOS was no different when patients classified as having gangrenous or perforated appendicitis were included in the analysis (3.7 days vs. 4.1 days, P=0.11). The laparoscopy group had significantly longer surgery times (72 min vs. 58 min, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative morbidity.

Conclusions:

Laparoscopic appendectomy reduces LOS as compared with the traditional open technique in patients with acute suppurative appendicitis. The longer operative time for the laparoscopic approach in our study is likely related to the learning curve associated with the procedure and did not increase morbidity.     

Perforated and non-perforated acute appendicitis--one disease or two entities?

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the pattern of clinical presentation of perforated and non-perforated acute appendicitis in 544 unselected patients treated surgically for suspected acute appendicitis; to find out if their presentation differed. DESIGN: Open prospective population-based study. SETTING: Teaching hospital, western Norway. PATIENTS: All 434 patients operated on for suspected acute appendicitis from the catchment area of a single hospital in whom the diagnosis was confirmed. INTERVENTIONS: Appendicectomy; history, clinical findings, and inflammatory markers were recorded in all patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) obtained by logistic regression analysis of symptoms and signs of acute appendicitis with regard to independent predictors of perforation of the appendix. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of inflammatory markers. RESULTS: The perforation rate was 20% (n = 88). Perforation was unlikely when abdominal pain was limited to the right iliac fossa, (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.33). Increased C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration >50 U/L (OR 4.6, 95% Cl 2.44 to 8.75) and greater age (by decade; OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.36) were independent predictors of perforation of the appendix. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical differences between perforated and non-perforated acute appendicitis could be explained by the presence of advanced inflammation in patients with perforated appendicitis. Our data do not support the hypothesis that they are two clinically different diseases.     

Epidemiology of appendicitis

Summary. Epidemiological data reveal a decline in the incidence of appendicitis and appendectomy in the industrialized countries. A peak is found in adolescents aged 10–19 years; however, the highest rates of perforation are reported for the extremely young and old age groups. The elevated rate of appendectomies without histological evidence of acute inflammation, especially in young women, and the high perforation ratio in small children and elderly patients reflect poor diagnostic accuracy. Analysis of the epidemiological data does not allow for an unequivocal conclusion regarding the etiopathogenesis of acute appendicitis.      

Appendicitis in mature patients.

All patients greater than 50 years of age (N = 96) admitted with a pre- or postoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis from 1971 to 1980 were reviewed. A comparative series of 91 patients aged 25 to 50 years was similarly reviewed. Noninflammatory diseases of the appendix and incidental appendectomies were excluded. Detailed study of symptoms, clinical presentation, laboratory evaluation, radiographic evaluation, concomitant diseases, hospital course, surgical findings, complications, and mortality were completed. Comparison of patients aged 25 to 50 to patients older than 50 years revealed a statistically significant increased incidence of perforation in the older group (p less than 0.0001). Sixty-five per cent of the older group showed greater incidence of perforation. Further analysis of this series yields the hypothesis that the increased incidence of perforation is related to a significant decrease in the frequency of classic presentation in the greater-than-50 age group, a significant decrease in frequency of correct admission diagnosis and a significant delay between admission and surgical procedure in the older group. A more rapid pathophysiologic progression of appendicitis with increasing age was noted. A much higher percentage of older patients was undiagnosed until the surgical procedure. In this group, there was a longer duration of symptoms, less frequent classic presentation, and decreased frequency of right lower quadrant guarding and tenderness as compared to patients with correct diagnosis prior to surgery. Complications were much more frequent in older patients and higher still in those with perforation. Analysis of findings by decade of life revealed an anticipated high incidence of perforated appendicitis in patients greater than 50, but also showed a continuation of the high incidence of perforation into the decade 40 to 50. There were three deaths in the entire study group (1.6%) all occurring in the older age group with postoperative sepsis.     

Appendicitis in the aged

From 1984 to 1989 78 patients over the age of 60 years were operated on acute appendicitis. Compared to appendicitis in younger people these older patients showed 3 times longer an interval between the first appearance of symptoms and their contact to the doctor, or surgical treatment. As result of this longer period appeared the high perforation rate 53.8%. In this group of patients with perforation the complication rate was 4 times higher than the intraoperative and histologically confirmed acute appendicitis. From these facts results a mortality rate of 4%. In the retrospective evaluation was also seen that there was no conclusion between the laboratory parameters, the physical symptoms and the degree of the inflammation of the evidence of perforation with local or diffused peritonitis. The inclusion of appendicitis in the differential diagnosis of acute abdominal pain in older people offers the chance of an earlier surgical treatment, so reducing the risk of postoperative complication and mortality.     

Insurance status, but not race, predicts perforation in adult patients with acute appendicitis

BACKGROUND: Delay in treatment is a strong risk factor for perforation during acute appendicitis. In addition, lower socioeconomic status has been linked to impaired access to surgical care. We sought to examine the relationships among race, insurance status, and perforation in a recent, adult population with acute appendicitis. STUDY DESIGN: Data on adult patients with acute appendicitis were abstracted from the New York State Statewide Planning and Cooperative Systems Database for the years 2003 and 2004. A multiple logistic regression model, which adjusted for patient, community, and hospital factors, was used to examine the independent effects of both race and insurance status on likelihood of perforation. RESULTS: A total of 29,637 patients had acute appendicitis; 7,969 (26.9%) of these were perforated. Although Caucasian patients were more likely to perforate compared with minority patients, by univariate analysis, adjustment for age alone eliminated this disparity. In addition, by multivariable analysis, no difference existed in odds of perforation for Caucasian patients compared with African-American (odds ratio [OR]=1.03, 95% CI [0.93, 1.15], p=0.52), Hispanic (OR=0.99, 95% CI [0.90, 1.08], p=0.82), or Asian patients (OR=0.85, 95% CI [0.73, 1.00], p=0.05). But compared with privately insured patients, uninsured patients (OR 1.18, 95% CI [1.07 to 1.30], p=0.0005), Medicaid patients (OR=1.22, 95% CI [1.12 to 1.33], p < 0.0001), and Medicare patients (OR=1.14, 95% CI [1.03, 1.25], p=0.01) were significantly more likely to have perforation. CONCLUSIONS: Race does not appear to be an important variable in predicting perforation in adult patients with acute appendicitis, but the likelihood of perforation varies significantly according to insurance status. Future research is necessary to both understand and have an impact on this socioeconomic disparity.     

Is the incidence of acute appendicitis really falling?

To determine if there has been a genuine fall in the incidence of acute appendicitis, an epidemiological study using HAA and Korner datasets for the years 1975-1994 was carried out to identify those children and young adults undergoing appendicectomy for acute appendicitis. The overall incidence of acute appendicitis fell from 1.84/1000 to 1.17/1000. This fall was statistically significant (R2 = 0.74, P < 0.01). The decrease was significant in both males (overall reduction, 34%) and females (overall reduction, 40%). No significant reduction was observed in either males or females between 15 and 19 years of age. The overall reduction remains essentially unexplained, but may have implications for health planning and provision of services.     

Appendicitis In The Elderly

Background : Acute appendicitis in the elderly (i.e. those over 60 years of age) is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. The present retrospective study reviews 10 years (1986–1996) of experience and outcome in treating acute appendicitis in patients aged 60 or above. Methods : One hundred and thirty patients with acute appendicitis were identified and their case notes reviewed. Results : Acute appendicitis was diagnosed at admission in 84 patients (64.6%). The remaining patients were observed for a median duration of 9.4 h prior to diagnosis and treatment. Patients with an underlying perforated acute appendix had a significantly longer period of pain prior to admission (P = 0.029; Mann–Whitney U‐test) but perforation per se was not associated with a significantly higher rate of morbidity and longer length of hospital stay. In contrast, the use of midline or paramedian incisions was associated with a higher wound infection rate (P = 0.003; Pearson chi‐squared test) and a longer hospital stay (P < 0.001; Mann–Whitney U‐test). None of the patients were subsequently found to have an underlying colonic neoplasm. The overall morbidity rate was 28%. The mortality rate was 2.3% and all three patients who died had a severe comorbid medical condition prior to developing acute appendicitis. Conclusions : Acute appendicitis in the elderly is still associated with significant morbidity. But once acute appendicitis is diagnosed, then expedient surgery, appropriate use of perioperative antibiotics and a right lower quadrant incision can help to minimize the morbidity. Pre‐existing severe comorbid medical condition(s) is a major contributory factor to mortality in these patients.     

Acute appendicitis: is there a difference between children and adults?

Historically, the lack of classic symptoms and delay in presentation make diagnosing acute appendicitis more difficult in children, resulting in a higher perforation rate. Despite this, the morbidity of acute appendicitis is usually lower in children. We evaluated the current differences in clinical presentation, diagnostic clues, and the outcomes of acute appendicitis between the two age groups. A retrospective review of 210 consecutive cases of pediatric appendectomy and 744 adult cases for suspected acute appendicitis from January 1995 to December 2000. Pediatric patients were defined as being 13 years and younger. Pediatric patients were similar to adult patients with respect to duration of pain before presentation (2.4 +/- 4.3 days vs 2.5 +/- 7.3 days), number of patients previously evaluated (22.0 vs 17.7%), number of imaging tests (computed tomography or ultrasound; 32.9 vs 40.2%), and number of patients observed (16.7 vs 17.2%). However, pediatric patients required less time for emergency room evaluation (4.0 +/- 2.7 hours vs 5.7 +/- 4.9 hours, P = 0.0001). In children and adults, a history of classic, migrating pain had the highest positive predictive value (94.2 vs 89.6%), followed by a white blood cell count > or =12 x 109/L (91.5 vs 84.3%). The overall negative appendectomy rate was 10.0 per cent for children and 19.0 per cent for adults (P = 0.003); the perforation rate was 19.0 per cent and 13.8 per cent, respectively (P > 0.05). The perforation rate in children was not associated with a delay in presentation (perforated cases, 2.9 +/- 3.3 days compared with nonperforated cases, 2.3 +/- 4.6 days). Mortality and morbidity, including wound infection rate and intra-abdominal abscess rate, were similar. Contrary to traditional teaching, diagnosing acute appendicitis in children is similar to that in adults. A history of migratory pain together with physical findings and leukocytosis remain accurate diagnostic clues for children and adults. Perforation rate and morbidity in children is similar to those in adults. The outcomes of acute appendicitis in children are not associated with a delay in presentation or delay in diagnosis.