Differential effects of cyclosporine and tacrolimus on mycophenolate pharmacokinetics in patients with impaired kidney function

In a single-center prospective randomized controlled study, the impact of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) reduction or withdrawal on the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA) was studied in a group of renal transplant recipients with impaired renal function. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was added to a baseline regimen of prednisolone and CNI. Afterwards the patients were randomized into “CNI withdrawal” and “CNI continuation” groups. The dosage of CNIs, cyclosporine or tacrolimus, was gradually reduced and withdrawn within 6 weeks from patients in the withdrawal group. The continuation group was maintained on therapy with CNI, MMF, and steroids. These regimens were maintained until the ninth month. In contrast to the withdrawal of tacrolimus, which has no significant effect on MPA pharmacokinetics, cyclosporine withdrawal was associated with a significant increase in the trough levels and areas under the curve of MPA. Serum creatinine and urine albumine levels stabilized on average after CNI withdrawal in this population. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that cyclosporine attenuates the enterohepatic recirculation of MPA. The withdrawal of CNI has a positive effect on renal function in chronic allograft dysfunction.     

Calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing immunosuppressive protocols

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) have played an important role in improving graft survival. However, the balance between preventing immunologic allograft losses and the management of CNI-related nephrotoxicity is still an issue in renal transplantation. There are three major CNI-sparing strategies. CNI MINIMIZATION: The advent of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) allows cyclosporine (CsA) reduction to ameliorate renal function in patients with chronic renal allograft dysfunction, without increasing acute rejection rates. In combination with mTOR inhibitors, very low CNI levels may be sufficient to prevent acute rejection. However, in this association, CNI nephrotoxicity is magnified by pharmacokinetic interaction. CNI WITHDRAWAL: CNI withdrawal has been attempted in regimens containing MMF or sirolimus (SRL). Introduction of MMF in patients with chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) followed by CNI withdrawal resulted in stabilization or improvement of renal function and hypertension profile, although there is some risk of acute rejection. In regimes based on SRL, CNI withdrawal is a safety strategy, achieving a sustained improvement of renal function, histology, and graft survival. There is not consensus at all whether MMF should be added or not in patients converted from CNI to mTOR inhibitor. CNI AVOIDANCE: Polyclonal-based regimens with MMF and steroids have shown acceptable acute rejection rates, but high rates of cytomegalovirus (CMV) and opportunistic infections. Conversely, anti-IL-2R in combination with MMF and steroids resulted in 50% incidence of acute rejection, thus suggesting that CNI avoidance is not feasible in a regimen based on MMF. Alternatively, a protocol based on anti-IL-2R induction therapy combined with SRL, MMF, and prednisone has shown an efficient prevention of acute rejection, higher creatinine clearance and lower rate of CAN in comparison with a group treated with CNI. New strategies using costimulation blockade may help in the development of safe CNI-free regimens. In summary, in renal transplantation the new immunosuppressive medications have made feasible old aspirations such as minimization, withdrawal, or even avoidance of CNI.     

Predictors of improvement in renal function after calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal for post-liver transplant renal dysfunction

BACKGROUND: Renal dysfunction after liver transplantation is a major management problem. Predictors of improvement in renal dysfunction after calcineurin inhibitor therapy (CNI) withdrawal and replacement with either mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or azathioprine (AZA) have not previously been examined. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 33 post-transplant patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) below 50 mL/min who were changed from CNI to either MMF or AZA. Following CNI withdrawal patients were divided into two groups: those with improved CrCl after switching and those without, to identify the variables associated with improved renal function. RESULTS: Variables associated with improved CrCl were: absence of hypertension or diabetes, shorter time between transplantation and switch, deterioration in CrCl in months prior to switch and treatment with MMF (compared with AZA). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest CNI withdrawal should be targeted to a subgroup of patients whose renal function is most likely to improve.     

De Novo Kidney Transplantation Without Use of Calcineurin Inhibitors Preserves Renal Structure and Function at Two Years

We performed a randomized prospective trial comparing calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free to CNI-based immunosuppression to determine the impact on renal function, structure and gene expression. Sixty-one kidney recipients treated with basiliximab mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and prednisone (P) were randomly assigned to concentration-controlled sirolimus or cyclosporine. Two years post-transplant 55 patients underwent renal function studies, 48 (87%) underwent transplant biopsies; all classified by Banff scoring and 41 by DNA microarrays. Comparing sirolimus/MMF/P to cyclosporine/MMF/P there was a significantly lower serum creatinine (1.35 vs. 1.81 mg/dL; p = 0.008), higher Cockroft-Gault glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (80.4 vs. 63.4 mL/min; p = 0.008), iothalamate GFR (60.6 vs. 49.2 mL/min; p = 0.018) and Banff 0 (normal) biopsies (66.6 vs. 20.8%; p = 0.013). Regression analysis of calculated GFRs from 1 to 36 months yielded a positive slope for sirolimus of 3.36 mL/min/year, and a negative slope for cyclosporine of -1.58 mL/min/year (p = 0.008). Gene expression profiles from kidneys with higher Banff chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) scores confirmed significant up-regulation of genes responsible for immune/inflammation and fibrosis/tissue remodeling. At 2 years the sirolimus-treated recipients have better renal function, a diminished prevalence of CAN and down-regulated expression of genes responsible for progression of CAN. All may provide for an alternative natural history with improved graft survival.     

Rapamycin for treatment of chronic allograft nephropathy in renal transplant patients

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) represents the main cause of renal allograft loss after 1 yr of transplantation. Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) use is associated with increased graft expression of profibrotic cytokines, whereas rapamycin inhibits fibroblast proliferation. The aim of this randomized, prospective, open-label, single-center study was to evaluate the histologic and clinical effect of rapamycin on biopsy-proven CAN. Eighty-four consecutive patients who had biopsy-proven CAN and received a transplant were randomized to receive either a 40% CNI reduction plus mycophenolate mofetil (group 1; 50 patients) or immediate CNI withdrawal and rapamycin introduction with a loading dose of 0.1 mg/kg per d and a maintaining dose aiming at through levels of 6 to 10 ng/ml (group 2; 34 patients). The follow-up period was 24 mo. At the end of follow-up, 25 patients (group 1, 10 patients; group 2, 15 patients) underwent a second biopsy. CAN lesions were graded according to Banff criteria. alpha-Smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA) protein expression was evaluated in all biopsies as a marker of fibroblast activation. Graft function and Banff grading were superimposable at randomization. Graft survival was significantly better in group 2 (P = 0.0376, chi2 = 4.323). CAN grading worsened significantly in group 1, whereas it remained stable in group 2. After 24 mo, all group 1 biopsies showed an increase of alpha-SMA expression at the interstitial and vascular levels (P < 0.001); on the contrary, alpha-SMA expression was dramatically reduced in group 2 biopsies (P = 0.005). This study demonstrates that rapamycin introduction/CNI withdrawal improves graft survival and reduces interstitial and vascular alpha-SMA expression, slowing down the progression of allograft injury in patients with CAN.     

西罗莫司在肝移植术后肾功能异常患者中的应用

目的 探讨西罗莫司替换钙调磷酸酶抑制剂治疗肝移植术后肾功能不全的安全性和有效性.方法 北将肝移植术后发生肾功能不全的62例患者随机分为对照组和转换组.对照组29例,继续采用Tac(或CsA)、MMF及Pred的方案,血Tac(或CsA)浓度调整在治疗窗范围的下限;转换组33例,用SRL替换原方案中的Tac(或CsA),SRL的起始用量为2 mg/d,以后根据血SRL浓度及不良反应作相应调整,Tac(或CsA)减少至原用量的1/3～1/2,3 d后停用,MMF和Pred的用法不变.转换治疗后,对患者的肝肾功能、急性排斥反应及存活率进行随访监测,并观察患者在转换治疗期间发生的不良反应.结果 共有49例患者痊愈或者好转,13例死亡,对照组死亡8例,转换组死亡5例.随访9～51个月,转换组存活患者肝功能稳定,均未发生急性排斥反应.两组存活患者肾功能恢复后均未再出现反复,且转换组患者肾功能恢复时间明显缩短,治疗效果较好.转换组存活患者未发生严重不良反应,与对照组肺部感染发生率的比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 肝移植术后并发肾功能不全时,采用西罗莫司替换原免疫抑制方案中的CNI治疗是安全有效的.     

Mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression with sirolimus in renal transplantation: a randomized, controlled Spare-the-Nephron trial

As part of the Spare-the-Nephron trial, we evaluated the combination mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and sirolimus (SRL) as a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free regimen for the preservation of renal function in renal allograft recipients. This 2-year, open-label, multicenter trial randomized 299 patients of which 151 were maintained on MMF and a CNI, 148 on MMF plus SRL (n=120, tacrolimus; n=31, cyclosporine). Baseline characteristics including measured (iothalamate) glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were similar between groups. After 1 year, the mean percentage change from baseline in the primary end point of measured GFR was significantly higher in the MMF/SRL group compared with the MMF/CNI group. After 2 years, the change was indistinguishable. Calculated creatinine clearance and GFR were significantly greater with MMF/SRL at 2 years within which biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) occurred in 14 MMF/SRL-treated patients (3 graft losses) and in 17 receiving the MMF/CNI (6 graft losses). Significantly, no patients receiving MMF/SRL but five treated with MMF/CNI died. Thus, compared with MMF/CNI treatment, a 2-year regimen of MMF/SRL resulted in similar measures of renal function but with fewer deaths and a trend to less BPAR and graft loss.     

Calcineurin Inhibitor Withdrawal from Sirolimus-Based Therapy in Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials

Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal has been used as a strategy to improve renal allograft function, however, it also carries risk of acute rejection. We conducted a systematic review of randomized trials that involved CNI withdrawal from a sirolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen. The search strategy yielded six trials (n = 1047 patients) reported in eight publications. CNI withdrawal from sirolimus-based therapy, was associated with an increased risk of acute rejection (risk difference, 6%; 95% CI 2-10%, p = 0.002) but a higher creatinine clearance (mean difference, 7.49 mL/min; 95% CI 5.08-9.89 mL/min, p < 0.00001) at 1 year compared to continued CNI and sirolimus therapy. Graft loss (relative risk, 0.87; 95% CI 0.46-1.64, p = 0.66) and death (relative risk, 0.88; CI 0.40-1.96, p = 0.76) were similar in both groups at 1 year. Hypertension was significantly reduced in the CNI withdrawal group (relative risk, 0.56; 95% CI 0.40-0.78, p = 0.0006). CNI withdrawal from sirolimus-based therapy is associated with an increased risk of acute rejection in the short term with a significant improvement in renal function and a reduction in hypertension. Longer follow-up is needed to determine if these changes will result in a significant improvement in patient and graft survival.     

The safety and efficacy of early withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitors in kidney transplant recipients 6 months' posttransplant

INTRODUCTION: The introduction of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) in clinical transplantation has resulted in dramatic reduction in acute rejection rate and improvements in short-term allograft survival. However, CNI-induced chronic nephrotoxicity is a clinical concern since it is a major cause of chronic allograft failure. Recent studies suggest that withdrawal or reduction of CNI dosage results in improvement in graft function and survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of substituting CNIs with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) at 6 months' postkidney transplant. METHODS: Kidney transplant recipients of first or second grafts (n = 20) maintained on CNI-based therapy and with no history of irreversible acute or vascular rejection were included in the study. Primary end points were the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection or treatment failure. Secondary end points included changes in mean serum creatinine and estimated GFR (Cockroft and Gault, CG) over time, incidence of infection, cardiovascular risk factors (blood pressure, cholesterol), graft and patient survival rates, as well as incidence of biopsy-proven chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Study patients were compared to a matched control group (n = 20) who remained on CNI-based therapy at equivalent time points. RESULTS: Incidence of acute rejection following CNI withdrawal was 15%. All episodes reversed with steroid pulses. There was no significant difference in mean serum creatinine or estimated GFR during the follow-up period. No significant change occurred in blood pressure or antihypertensive agents between the groups; however, there was a trend toward lower cholesterol levels after CNI withdrawal. No graft or patient loss was seen during the study period. Biopsy-proven CAN was diagnosed in 2 control patients (10%) at 6 to 8 months' posttransplant. CONCLUSIONS: Withdrawal of CNI at 6 months following kidney transplantation is associated with an increased risk of rejection and a trend toward lower serum creatinine and cholesterol levels. Further follow-up is needed to establish the long-term results of CNI-sparing regimens on the development of CAN.     

Mycophenolate mofetil substitution for cyclosporine a in renal transplant recipients with chronic progressive allograft dysfunction: the "creeping creatinine" study

BACKGROUND: This study determined whether cyclosporine A (CsA)-treated renal allograft recipients with deteriorating renal function ("creeping creatinine") secondary to chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) benefit from the addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to their immunosuppressive regimen, followed by withdrawal of CsA. METHODS: In a controlled, open, multicenter study, CsA-treated renal allograft recipients with progressively deteriorating renal function were randomized to have their CsA discontinued with the concomitant addition of MMF to their regimen (group A) or to continue treatment with CsA (group B). The primary endpoint was the response rate over the 6-month period after withdrawal of CsA in group A or the equivalent time in group B. Response was defined as a stabilization or reduction of serum creatinine (SCr), as evidenced by a flattening or positive slope of the 1/SCr plot and no graft loss. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of acute rejection, graft and patient survival, and changes in selected metabolic parameters. RESULTS: The response rate in the primary intent-to-treat population (n=122) was 58% (36/62) in group A versus 32% (19/60) in group B (P=0.0060). The corresponding percentages of responders in the per-protocol population (n=107) were 60% (36/60) and 26% (12/47), respectively (P=0.0008). There were no acute rejections in group A during the study period. Patients in this group also experienced a significant decrease in total cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with progressively deteriorating renal function secondary to CAN, addition of MMF followed by withdrawal of CsA results in a significant improvement in transplant function without the risk of acute rejection.     

Poor tolerance of sirolimus in a steroid avoidance regimen for renal transplantation

Vascular disease and chronic allograft nephropathy have prompted re-evaluation of steroids and calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) in renal transplantation. Sirolimus (SRL) can facilitate early CNI withdrawal. We report on the Early CNI and Steroid Elimination in Leeds (ECSEL) study, which was terminated early due to poor tolerability of SRL. Basiliximab/methylprednisolone induction was used, then 2 months of tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatment. A total of 51 patients were randomized to continue TAC/MMF or switch to SRL/MMF. In ECSEL1, patients were switched at 2 months (n=10). In ECSEL2, SRL was introduced at months 4-6 and TAC was tapered (n=13). Median overall follow up was 701 days. All 10 ECSEL1 and 10 of 13 (77%) ECSEL2 patients discontinued SRL due to adverse events, including leucopenia, rash, mucosal ulceration, arthralgia, and possible pneumonitis. Mean end-of-study creatinine was comparable in all groups. Sirolimus should be used with caution in complete CNI and steroid withdrawal, due to the resultant intolerable adverse event profile.     

Mycophenolate Mofetil Monotherapy for Severe Side Effects of Calcineurin Inhibitors Following Liver Transplantation

Withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) followed by mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) monotherapy after liver transplantation (LT) remains controversial due to the increased risk of acute rejection and graft loss. The aim of the present study, performed in a large cohort of liver-transplanted patients with severe CNI-induced side effects, was to assess renal function recovery, and safety in terms of liver function, of complete CNI withdrawal and replacement by MMF monotherapy. Fifty-two patients treated with MMF monotherapy for CNI-induced toxicity were analyzed. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increased significantly during the period of MMF monotherapy, from 37 ± 10 to 44.7 ± 15 mL/min/1.73 m² at 6 months (p = 0.001) corresponding to a benefit of +17.4% in renal function. eGFR stabilized or improved in 86.5%, 81% and 79% of cases, and chronic renal dysfunction worsened in 13.5%, 19% and 21% of cases, at 6, 12 and 24 months after CNI withdrawal, respectively. Only two patients experienced acute rejection. MMF monotherapy may be efficient at reversing/stabilizing CRD, and appears relatively safe in terms of liver graft function in long-term liver-transplanted patients. However, clinicians must bear in mind the potential risk of rejection and graft loss, and should be very cautious in the management of such 'difficult-to-treat patients'.     

Lower Incidence of Chronic Allograft Nephropathy at 1 Year Post-Transplantation in Patients Treated with Mycophenolate Mofetil

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is the main cause of graft failure after the first year of transplantation. This prospective, centrally randomized, open-label study was conducted to examine the possibility that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) can prevent the emergence of CAN. The incidence of biopsy-proven CAN at 1 year was compared between two cyclosporine-based regimens comprising either mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or azathioprine (AZA). The AZA group (n = 34) and the MMF group (n = 37) were balanced for all baseline characteristics of donors and recipients, the pre-existence of renal lesions on donor biopsy, the incidence of delayed graft function and acute rejection. Based on an intent-to-treat analysis, the number of patients with CAN at 1 year post-transplantation was significantly reduced in the MMF group (17/37-46%) compared with the AZA group (24/34-71%) (p = 0.03). When observed data were considered, 56/71 (78.8%) patients had a 1-year biopsy, and the number of patients with CAN was significantly lowered in the MMF group (9/29-31%) compared with the AZA group (17/27-63%) (p = 0.01). These results suggest a beneficial effect of MMF on the incidence of CAN at 1 year post-transplantation.     

Mycophenolate mofetil in IgA nephropathy: results of a 3-year prospective placebo-controlled randomized study

BACKGROUND: Because humoral immunity is believed to play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy (IgAN), a prospective placebo-controlled randomized study was started in patients with IgAN using mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). METHODS: A total of 34 patients with IgAN were treated with salt intake restriction, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition and MMF 2 g per day (N= 21) or placebo (N= 13). After 36 months of follow-up clinical, biochemical, and radiologic data were analyzed using linear mixed models for longitudinal data and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: Therapy had to be stopped prematurely in five patients. Two patients (MMF group) evolved to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). There was no difference between groups in the percentage of patients with a decrease of 25% or more in the inulin clearance or with a serum creatinine increase of 50% or more over 3 years. There was also no significant difference between groups in annualized rate of change of serum creatinine, computed by linear regression analysis. No significant difference was noted between groups for inulin clearance, serum creatinine, proteinuria, blood pressure, or other parameters of renal function. Hemoglobin and C-reactive protein were significantly lower in the MMF group compared with the placebo group. As a function of time, a significant decline in both groups was noted of proteinuria, parenchymal thickness of the kidneys and C3d. CONCLUSION: In patients with IgAN at risk for progressive disease, no beneficial effect of 3-year treatment with MMF 2 g per day could be demonstrated on renal function/outcome or proteinuria. However, larger randomized studies are needed to confirm or reject these results.     

Renal function after liver transplantation: calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity

Renal failure, mainly due to calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity, is the most common complication following orthotopic liver transplantation (ltx). The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and course of renal failure in adult ltx patients. Severe acute renal failure in early postoperative period due to impaired hemodynamics and CNI nephrotoxicity, occurred in 14 patients, 3 of whom required dialysis. The creatinine clearance after ltx showed a tendency to decrease, but there was no statistically significant difference (P >.05) in the change in serum creatinine clearance levels between patients treated with tacrolimus (TAC) versus Cyclosporine (CsA) during the first 2 years of follow-up. Fourteen patients required conversion of their regimen because of CNI nephrotoxicity namely, dose reduction (n = 7) or discontinuation of CNI therapy with the replacement by mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (n = 5) or SRL (n = 5). Dose reduction or CNI withdrawal significantly improved the creatinine clearance (P <.05) without affecting lives graft function. No episode of acute rejection was observed after conversion. Neither conversion of CsA to TAC nor the reverse maneuver significantly influenced the serum creatinine level (P >.05). Reduction of the CNI dose or CNI discontinuation or replacement with MMF or SRL in patients with stable liver but impaired renal function is safe, resulting in a significant improvement in renal function.     

Long-term efficacy and safety of a calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen in live-donor renal transplant recipients

Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity is a major concern after renal transplantation. To investigate the safety and efficacy of a CNI-free immunosuppressive regimen, 132 live-donor renal transplant recipients were included in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. All patients received induction therapy with basiliximab and steroids. The patients were randomized to a maintenance immunosuppression regimen that included steroids, sirolimus, and either low-dose tacrolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Over a mean follow-up period of approximately 5 yr, patient and graft survival did not significantly differ between the two maintenance regimens. Patient survival was 93.8% and 98.5% in the tacrolimus/sirolimus and MMF/sirolimus groups, respectively, and graft survival was 83% and 88%, respectively. However, the MMF/sirolimus group had significantly better renal function, calculated by Cockcroft-Gault, from the second year post-transplant until the last follow-up. In addition, this group was less likely to require a change in their primary immunosuppression regimen than the tacrolimus/sirolimus group (20.8% versus 53.8%, P = 0.001). The safety profile was similar between groups. In summary, after long-term follow-up, a CNI-free maintenance regimen consisting of sirolimus, MMF, and steroids was both safe and efficacious among low to moderate immunologic risk renal transplant recipients.     

Improvement of acute and chronic renal dysfunction in liver transplant patients after substitution of calcineurin inhibitors by mycophenolate mofetil

BACKGROUND: Renal dysfunction caused by treatment with the calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) is a major problem in the long-term course after liver transplantation. PATIENTS: In 22 liver graft recipients with renal dysfunction and stable graft function between 3 weeks and 12 years after transplantation, CNI were substituted by MMF at a final dose of 1.5-3 g/day between October 1996 and October 1998. METHODS: In a prospective non-randomized study, the development of renal function, the side effects of MMF medication, and the stability of liver function were analyzed for a mean follow-up of 15 months. Results. (1) MMF was withdrawn in four patients for major side effects between 1 and 7 months after study entry; eight patients had minor side effects. (2) Six months after study entry, renal function had improved in 17 of the 22 study patients; mean serum creatinine +/-SD (micromol/L) was 201+/-77 at entry and 153+/-65 after 3 months (P<0.001). (3) Improvement occurred in 11 of 15 patients with creatinine elevation > or =12 months and in 6 of 6 patients with creatinine elevation < or =6 months. (4) One patient developed transient liver dysfunction and a second required retransplantation for progressive cholestasis but without signs of rejection. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who undergo liver transplantation, substitution of CNI by MMF leads to improvement of acute as well as chronic renal dysfunction in most cases. Side effects of MMF may be limiting in some patients, and the immunological consequences remain to be studied.     

Calcineurin inhibitor minimization protocols in liver transplantation

Liver transplant recipients are at increasingly high risk for suffering from impaired renal function and probable need of renal replacement therapy. Extended criteria organs and transplantation of patients with higher model for end-stage liver disease scores further increase this problem. Acute and chronic nephrotoxicity are the trade-off in immunosuppression with potent calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). As a good renal function is associated with better graft and patient survival, CNI minimization protocols have been developed. Current strategies to overcome CNI toxicity include reduction or withdrawal of CNIs concurrently with switching over to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-based regimens. This strategy caused an improvement in renal function in a significant number of liver transplantation patients according to several studies. However, total CNI avoidance seems to result in higher rejection rates. To prevent chronic renal dysfunction in patients prone to or with acute renal failure, CNI delay – with induction therapy for bridging – followed by low-dose CNI in combination with MMF are proven strategies without risking higher rejection rates. An individualized, tailor-made immunosuppressive regime, with a special focus on renal function is recommended. This review gave an overview on CNI minimization protocols in liver transplantation also focusing on recently analyzed studies.     

Calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity: reduction in dose results in marked improvement in renal function in patients with coexisting chronic allograft nephropathy

BACKGROUND: Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) have significantly reduced the incidence of acute rejection. Nephrotoxicity however, may contribute to long-term allograft dysfunction. METHODS: Forty-six biopsies from patients who had been transplanted for more than 6 months were examined. Sixteen biopsies had evidence of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) alone, 21 biopsies had evidence of coexisting CAN in addition to histological evidence of calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity (CNIN) while nine had neither evidence of nephrotoxicity nor CAN. Patients with evidence of nephrotoxicity underwent a reduction in dose of CNI while those with CAN alone had no change in therapy. Renal function was followed for a mean of 17.4 months after biopsy. RESULTS: The serum creatinine at the time of diagnostic renal biopsy was comparable between those with CAN alone (mean 0.25 +/- 0.18 mmol/L) and those with coexisting CNIN (mean 0.23 +/- 0.05 mmol/L, p=0.33). The patients with CNIN however, had a rapid improvement in renal function within 1 month after dose reduction. This was sustained for the duration of follow-up (mean serum creatinine 0.162 +/- 0.038 mmol/L at 1 yr after dose reduction; p=0.001). In comparison, those with CAN alone had a gradual decline in renal function with a serum creatinine at 1 yr after biopsy of 0.31 +/- 0.187, p=0.01. CONCLUSION: Reduction in the dose of CNI in those with histological evidence of nephrotoxicity resulted in a sustained improvement in renal function.     

Calcineurin Inhibitor Sparing With Mycophenolate Mofetil in Liver Transplantion: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Liver transplant recipients are at high risk of developing acute and chronic renal failure. Moreover, introduction of the model for end‐stage liver disease (MELD) score for primary allocation of liver grafts favors patients with pretransplant kidney dysfunction, which in turn have a higher risk of posttransplant renal failure. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) further increase the risk of renal failure and therefore sparing CNI with the use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) may improve renal function. MMF may either be used de novo in the immediate posttransplant period in combination with low‐dose CNI (scenario 1) or patients that receive immunosuppression based on CNI may be converted to MMF in combination with minimization or elimination of CNI (scenario 2). Although many retrospective cohort studies and nonrandomized trials have implicated efficacy of this approach the evidence from randomized controlled studies has not been summarized. In the current review we report the results of a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials.