Leucovorin and fluorouracil vs levamisole and fluorouracil as adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 6-month therapy with leucovorin (LV) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) vs 12 months of therapy with levamisole (LVZ) + 5-FU, as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected Dukes' stage B2 or C rectal cancer. One hundred and fifty patients with surgically resected rectal carcinoma, were enrolled in the present study; Dukes' stage B2 (n=70) or C (n=80), were randomly assigned to chemotherapy with 5-FU + LV x 6 months or 5-FU + LVZ x 12 months. Patient characteristics were equally balanced between the examined groups. Adjuvant CT consisted of LV 20 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.) plus 5-FU 450 mg/m(2) i.v., on days 1-5 every 4 weeks for 6 cycles or 5-FU 450 mg/m(2) i.v. every week plus LVZ 50 mg t.i.d x 3 days for 1 year. All patients received radiotherapy with a three-field technique to a total dose of 45 Gy, over 5 weeks. After a median follow-up of 7.4 years there were no significant differences between the two treatment groups with respect to the recurrence rates (P=0.821). Moreover, there was no difference in disease-free survival for patients stage Dukes' B2 (log-rank p=0.73); median for LV group 90 (8-131) months, and for LVZ group 86.5 (3-129) months. No difference was noted in disease-free survival for patients stage Dukes' C (log-rank p=0.73); median for LV group 60 (17-128) months, and for LVZ group 64 (2-123) months. There was no difference in overall survival for patients stage Dukes' B2 (log-rank p=0.75); median for LV group 90 (22-131) months, and for LVZ group 86 (10-129) months. For stage Dukes' C (log-rank p=0.73); median for LV group 67 (17-128) months, and for LVZ group 64 (5-123) months. Toxicities were as follows in the 5-FU + LVZ vs 5-FU + LV group; myelosuppression (leucopenia grade 3, 12% vs 4%, p<0.04), diarrhea (grade 0, 60% vs 76%, p<0.02), and liver toxicity (increase of transaminases >3-fold, 12 patients vs 2, p<0.03), were more frequent in LVZ group. None of the patients stopped chemotherapy because of the toxicity, and there were no toxicity-related deaths. In conclusion, adjuvant chemotherapy in RC with LV + 5-FU for 6 months is equally effective and less toxic than LVZ + 5-FU for 12 months.     

Comparative efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with Dukes' B versus Dukes' C colon cancer: results from four National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project adjuvant studies (C-01, C-02, C-03, and C-04)

PURPOSE: Although the benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy has been clearly established in patients with Dukes' C colon cancer, such benefit has been questioned in patients with Dukes' B disease. To determine whether patients with Dukes' B disease benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy and to evaluate the magnitude of the benefit, compared with that observed in Dukes' C patients, we examined the relative efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy according to Dukes' stage in four sequential National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project trials (C-01, C-02, C-03, and C-04) that compared different adjuvant chemotherapy regimens with each other or with no adjuvant treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The four trials included Dukes' B and C patients and were conducted between 1977 and 1990. The eligibility criteria and follow-up requirements were similar for all four trials. Protocol C-01 compared adjuvant semustine, vincristine, and fluorouracil (5-FU) (MOF regimen) with operation alone. Protocol C-02 compared the perioperative administration of a portal venous infusion of 5-FU with operation alone. Protocol C-03 compared adjuvant 5-FU and leucovorin (LV) with adjuvant MOF. Protocol C-04 compared adjuvant 5-FU and LV with 5-FU and levamisole (LEV) and with the combination of 5-FU, LV, and LEV. RESULTS: Forty-one percent of the patients included in these four trials had resected Dukes' B tumors. In all four studies, the overall, disease-free, and recurrence-free survival improvement noted for all patients was evident in both Dukes' B and Dukes' C patients. When the relative efficacy of chemotherapy was examined, there was always an observed reduction in mortality, recurrence, or disease-free survival event, irrespective of Dukes' stage, and in most instances, the reduction was as great or greater for Dukes' B patients as for Dukes' C patients. When data from all four trials were examined in a combined analysis, the mortality reduction was 30% for Dukes' B patients versus 18% for Dukes' C patients. The mortality reduction in Dukes' B patients occurred irrespective of the presence or absence of adverse prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Patients with Dukes' B colon cancer benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy and should be presented with this treatment option. Regardless of the presence or absence of other clinical prognostic factors, Dukes' B patients seem to benefit from chemotherapy administration.     

Thymidylate synthase expression in colorectal cancer: a prognostic and predictive marker of benefit from adjuvant fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: We studied the prognostic value of thymidylate synthase (TS) expression in primary colorectal cancer (CRC) and the role of TS expression as a predictor of chemotherapeutic benefit in patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TS expression was immunohistochemically assessed on tumor sections from 862 patients with CRC Dukes' stages B and C enrolled onto randomized trials evaluating fluorouracil (5-FU)-based adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: TS expression was an independent prognostic factor for disease-free (P =.05) and overall survival (P =.05). In the subgroup treated with surgery alone, TS was an independent prognostic factor for disease-free (P <.001) and overall survival (P =.001), whereas this was not the case in the subgroup of adjuvantly treated patients. Patients whose tumors expressed high TS levels had a tendency to improved outcome after adjuvant therapy (not significant). The group whose tumors expressed the highest TS grade, grade 3 (34% of the patients), had a significantly longer disease-free survival if they were treated with adjuvant therapy compared with surgery alone (multivariate analyses, P =.02), whereas patients whose tumors expressed low TS levels (28% of the patients) had an impaired outcome after adjuvant therapy (multivariate analyses: disease-free survival, P =.01; overall survival, P =.01). CONCLUSION: TS expression predicts for survival independent of Dukes' stage in patients with CRC treated with surgery alone. The study indicates that patients with high TS levels may benefit from adjuvant 5-FU-based chemotherapy. However, patients with low TS levels seem to have a worse outcome when treated with adjuvant chemotherapy.     

Adjuvant therapy for colorectal carcinoma

Adjuvant therapy for colorectal carcinoma has been developed over the last two decades. We have reviewed the history of adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal carcinoma in the United States, Europe and Japan with regard to the rationale of the chemotherapy regimen and the survival benefit for the establishment of a standard regimen. Treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) for postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy had an overall survival benefit, compared with surgery alone, in randomized controlled trials in the United States and Europe for Dukes' C colon carcinoma. In contrast, the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for Dukes' B colon carcinoma and for rectal carcinoma has not yet been established. In Japan, randomized controlled trials have examined combination treatment with mitomycin (MMC) and oral fluoropyrimidines for colorectal carcinoma compared with surgery alone. A meta-analysis indicated that combination treatment with MMC and oral fluoropyrimidines had a survival benefit for colorectal carcinoma. The survival benefit of combination treatment with irinotecan (CPT-11) + 5-FU + LV or uracil + tegaful (UFT) + LV (Orzel) for adjuvant chemotherapy are currently being compared with 5-FU + LV. Meta-analysis revealed a survival benefit at 2-years in the prevention of liver metastasis following intraportal or intraarterial infusion of 5-FU. The survival benefit of preoperative radiotherapy was superior to postoperative radiotherapy for advanced rectal carcinoma in association with the prevention of local recurrence. Clinical trial data suggest that the current standard regimen of adjuvant chemotherapy is a combination of 5-FU and LV for Dukes' C colon carcinoma and that radiotherapy for local control of rectal carcinoma has a survival benefit.     

Fluorouracil plus leucovorin as effective adjuvant chemotherapy in curatively resected stage III colon cancer: results of the trial adjCCA-01.

PURPOSE: Adjuvant postoperative treatment with fluorouracil (5-FU) and levamisole in curatively resected stage III colon cancer significantly reduces the risk of cancer recurrence and improves survival. Biochemical modulation of 5-FU with leucovorin has resulted in increased remission rates in metastatic colorectal cancer, thus reflecting an increased tumor-cell kill. The impact of 5-FU plus leucovorin on survival and tumor recurrence was analyzed in comparison with the effects of 5-FU plus levamisole in the prospective multicentric trial adjCCA-01. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a curatively resected International Union Against Cancer stage III colon cancer were stratified according to T, N, and G category and randomly assigned to receive one of the two adjuvant treatment schemes: 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) body-surface area intravenously in the first chemotherapy course, then 450 mg/m(2) x 5 days; 12 cycles, plus leucovorin 100 mg/m(2) (arm A), or 5-FU plus levamisole (Moertel scheme; arm B). RESULTS: Six hundred eighty (96.9%) of 702 patients enrolled onto this study were eligible. After a median follow-up time of 46.5 months, the 5-FU plus leucovorin combination significantly improved disease-free survival (P =.037) and significantly decreased overall mortality (P =.0089) in comparison with 5-FU plus levamisole. In a multivariate proportional hazards model, adjuvant chemotherapy emerged as a significant prognostic factor for survival (P =.0059) and disease-free survival (P =.03). Adjuvant treatment with 5-FU plus levamisole as well as with 5-FU plus leucovorin was generally well tolerated; only a minority of patients experienced grade 3 and 4 toxicities. CONCLUSION: After a curative resection of a stage III colon cancer, adjuvant treatment with 5-FU plus leucovorin is generally well tolerated and significantly more effective than 5-FU plus levamisole in reducing tumor relapse and improving survival.     

Adjuvant levamisole and fluorouracil in high risk colorectal cancer patients

Adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients is aimed at decreasing the relapse rate of the disease and increasing the disease-free and the overall survival of the patients. In a prospective study we evaluated the efficacy of 5-FU plus levamisole as an aduvant therapy for 153 patients with Dukes' B-2 or C colon or rectal cancer following a curative-intended surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy was started within 4 to 6 weeks following the operation. Combination of 5-FU 375 mg/m(2)/day was given intravenously over 15-20 min for 5 consecutive days, every month for 1 year. Levamisole 50 mg t.i.d. was administered orally during the first 3 days of each course of chemotherapy. Rectal cancer patients were also irradiated to the tumor bed and pelvic lymphatics. The dose intensities (DI) of 5-FU and levamisole in our study were 432.6 mg/m(2)/w and 103.8 mg/m(2)/w, respectively. Failure analysis in Dukes' B and C patients showed that the rectum accounted for 47.5% of the relapses, of which only 3 cases were in the vicinity of the resected area. Almost half of the failures were observed within the year of adjuvant treatment. The liver was the most common site for first relapse (50%). The 3-year disease-free survival of Dukes' B-2 patients group was 84%, compared with 64% in Dukes' C. The main toxic manifestations were diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, weakness and mucositis. No dose reduction was needed. Our protocol, using lower DI of levamisole yielded similar results with a lower rate of toxicity than other common protocols.     

Clinical trial to assess the relative efficacy of fluorouracil and leucovorin, fluorouracil and levamisole, and fluorouracil, leucovorin, and levamisole in patients with Dukes' B and C carcinoma of the colon: results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project C-04.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of leucovorin-modulated fluorouracil (FU+LV) with that of fluorouracil and levamisole (FU+LEV) or with the combination of FU+LV and levamisole (FU+LV+LEV). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 1989 and December 1990, 2,151 patients with Dukes' B (stage II) and Dukes' C (stage III) carcinoma of the colon were entered onto National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowl Project protocol C-04. Patients were randomly assigned to receive FU+LV (weekly regimen), FU + LEV, or the combination of FU+LV+LEV. The average time on study was 86 months. RESULTS: A pairwise comparison between patients treated with FU+LV or FU+LEV disclosed a prolongation in disease-free survival (DFS) in favor of the FU+LV group (65% v 60%; P =.04); there was a small prolongation in overall survival that was of borderline significance (74% v 70%; P =.07). There was no difference in the pairwise comparison between patients who received FU+LV or FU+LV+LEV for either DFS (65% v 64%; P =.67) or overall survival (74% v 73%; P =.99). There was no interaction between Dukes' stage and the effect of treatment. CONCLUSION: In patients with Dukes' B and C carcinoma of the colon, treatment with FU+LV seems to confer a small DFS advantage and a borderline prolongation in overall survival when compared with treatment with FU+LEV. The addition of LEV to FU+LV does not provide any additional benefit over and above that achieved with FU+LV. These findings support the use of adjuvant FU+LV as an acceptable therapeutic standard in patients with Dukes' B and C carcinoma of the colon.     

Monthly 5-days 5-fluorouracil and low-dose leucovorin for adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer

We investigated the dose-related effect of the 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin regimen on survival in 139 colon cancer patients with Dukes' B2 and C2 stage disease. Chemotherapy consisted of 400 mg/m(2) of 5-FU and 20 mg/m(2) of leucovorin injected daily for 5 days in every 4 weeks for a maximum of 12 cycles. The total dose of 5-FU administered per body surface area had a significant effect on the 5-year disease-free survival and 5-year overall survival in stage B2 and C2 colon cancer patients (P=0.0018, P=0.0011). Analysis with reference to the median DSDI demonstrated that there was a significant difference in 5-year survival in Dukes' C2 (P=0.0016), but survival was not affected by the dose intensity. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only the total dose of 5-FU administered per surface area affected the 5-year disease-free survival and 5-year overall survival (P=0.0016, P=0.0007, respectively). It can be concluded that the total dose of 5-FU administered is important in planned dosage schedule of adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer.     

Chemoradiotherapy for Squamous Cell Cancer of the Anal Canal: A Systematic Review

Squamous cell cancer of the anal canal is a rare tumour for which there remains uncertainty regarding optimal therapy. A systematic review was conducted to summarise the evidence examining concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy or different chemotherapy regimens in combination with radiotherapy. MEDLINE, EMBASE and conference proceedings were searched for relevant randomised controlled trials. Outcomes of interest were colostomy rate, local failure, overall survival, disease-free survival, adverse effects and quality of life. Six randomised controlled trials were identified. Two trials reported lower colostomy and local failure rates for concurrent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus mitomycin C (MMC) and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone. The omission of MMC from this regimen resulted in higher colostomy and local failure rates and lower disease-free survival. Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent 5-FU plus cisplatin and radiotherapy resulted in a higher colostomy rate than concurrent 5-FU plus MMC and radiotherapy. Haematological toxicity rates were lower in patients who received radiotherapy with 5-FU alone or 5-FU plus cisplatin compared with 5-FU plus MMC. No benefit was seen for the addition of induction or maintenance chemotherapy to concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The available evidence continues to support the use of radiotherapy with concurrent 5-FU and MMC as standard treatment for cancer of the anal canal to decrease colostomy and local failure rates.     

早期乳腺癌患者根治术后的放射治疗

目的 探讨早期乳腺癌患者根治术后放射治疗的作用。方法 回顾分析605例T1－2N0－1M0乳腺癌患者接受乳腺癌根治性手术后的治疗情况,149例患者单纯手术,135例术后放疗,113例术后化疗或三苯氧胺治疗,208例术后化疗或三苯氧胺治疗加放疗。生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier方法和Log rank检验。结果 单纯手术组与手术＋放射治疗组的10年局部区域复发率分别为18．7％和7．5％（P＝0．017）,总生存率分别为82．1％和81．1％（P＝0．618）,无瘤生存率分别为65．2％和71．6％（P＝0．457）。术后放射治疗能显著降低局部区域复发率,但对总生存率和无瘤生存率无明显影响。单纯术后全身治疗组和术后全身治疗＋放射治疗组的10年局部区域复发率分别为21．1％和9．5％（P＝0．001）,总生存率为75．5％和85．0％（P＝0．020）,无瘤生存率为59．3％和70．2％（P＝0．003）。术后放射治疗＋化疗不仅可显著降低局部区域复发率,还可提高无瘤生存率和总生存率。对窝淋巴结数≥4个接受全身治疗的患者,放射治疗有明显的疗效,能显著降低局部区域复发率,提高无瘤生存率和总生存率,这组患者未放射治疗组和放射治疗组的10年局部区域复发率分别为40．1％和15．1％（P＝0．001）,总生存率为54．4％和67．1％（P＝0．040）,无瘤生存率为30．5％和57．3％（P＝0．001）。结论 对早期乳腺癌窝淋巴结转移≥4个的患者,术后放疗能显著降低局部区域复发率,提高生存率。建议对这部分患者做常规术后放疗。     

The role of irradiation of the internal mammary lymph nodes in high-risk stage II to IIIA breast cancer patients after high-dose chemotherapy: a prospective sequential nonrandomized study.

PURPOSE: This phase II single-institution prospective, nonrandomized trial investigates high-dose adjuvant chemotherapy and locoregional radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer. We compared the outcome of patients in this study treated with radiotherapy fields including the internal mammary nodes (IMN) to a group of patients who did not receive IMN irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 100 patients with high-risk stage II-III breast cancer received doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy, stem-cell support, and locoregional radiotherapy. The radiotherapy included electron-beam irradiation to the IMN. For 20 months during the study, no electron-beam facility was available and we were unable to deliver the IMN irradiation as planned to 33 patients. The remaining 67 patients (32 treated before and 35 treated after this period) received IMN irradiation. Patients with receptor-positive tumors received tamoxifen for 5 years. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 77 months for all of the patients, disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly prolonged in patients receiving IMN radiation compared to those without IMN radiation (73% v 52%; P =.02). A trend was seen for overall survival (OS; 78% v 64%; P =.08). Cox regression multivariate analysis found IMN radiotherapy to be significant both for DFS and OS. Estrogen receptor positivity was also significant for DFS. There was no treatment related mortality. CONCLUSION: In patients with high-risk stage II to III breast cancer, the inclusion of the IMN in the radiotherapy field was associated with a statistically significant increase in DFS and a borderline increase in OS.     

Results of adjuvant radiochemotherapy for gastric adenocarcinoma in Slovenia.

AIMS: To analyze the results of postoperative concomitant radiochemotherapy with 5-florouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in patients with gastric carcinoma treated in a single institution. METHODS: During 2001-2004, 123 patients with the mean age of 60 years, were treated for adenocarcinoma of the stomach, stage Ib-IV, with postoperative concomitant radiochemotherapy. Radical (R0) and non-radical (R1) resection of the tumor was performed in 107 and 16 patients, respectively. Adjuvant treatment consisted of five cycles of five-day chemotherapy with 5-FU (425 mg/m(2)) and LV (20 mg/m(2)) and concomitant radiotherapy with the total dose of 45 Gy. RESULTS: The treatment was completed according to the protocol in 101 patients. Stomatitis, dysphagia, and nausea and vomiting of grade three occurred in 32, 27, and 23 patients, respectively. The median follow-up time of 87 survivors was 30.4 months (range 17.4-58.3 months). At two years, locoregional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 86%, 65%, 74%, and 73%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the initial Hb level was identified as independent prognostic factor for all survival four endpoints, the involvement of whole stomach with cancer for LRC, the total dose of 5-FU per five-day cycle for DFS, and pT stage for DSS. CONCLUSIONS: In operable gastric carcinoma, postoperative concomitant radiochemotherapy with 5-FU and LV is feasible and its toxicity acceptable. Its potential to improve the treatment outcome compared to the surgery alone is yet to be tested in well designed prospective randomized studies.     

Surgery plus chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for localized squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus: a Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study--JCOG9204.

PURPOSE: We performed a multicenter randomized controlled trial to determine whether postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy improves outcome in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing radical surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing transthoracic esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy between July 1992 and January 1997 at 17 institutions were randomly assigned to receive surgery alone or surgery plus chemotherapy including two courses of cisplatin (80 mg/m2 of body-surface area x 1 day) and fluorouracil (800 mg/m2 x 5 days) within 2 months after surgery. Adaptive stratification factors were institution and lymph node status (pN0 versus pN1). The primary end point was disease-free survival. RESULTS: Of the 242 patients, 122 were assigned to surgery alone, and 120 to surgery plus chemotherapy. In the surgery plus chemotherapy group, 91 patients (75%) received both full courses of chemotherapy; grade 3 or 4 hematologic or nonhematologic toxicities were limited. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 45% with surgery alone, and 55% with surgery plus chemotherapy (one-sided log-rank, P =.037). The 5-year overall survival rate was 52% and 61%, respectively (P =.13). Risk reduction by postoperative chemotherapy was remarkable in the subgroup with lymph node metastasis. CONCLUSION: Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and fluorouracil is better able to prevent relapse in patients with esophageal cancer than surgery alone.     

Nonplatinum-based chemotherapy with irinotecan plus docetaxel for advanced or metastatic olfactory neuroblastoma: a retrospective analysis of 12 cases

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of chemotherapy with irinotecan plus docetaxel were retrospectively evaluated for olfactory neuroblastoma. METHODS: Twelve patients with histologically proven advanced or metastatic olfactory neuroblastoma were treated with chemotherapy with irinotecan plus docetaxel at the study institution between 2001 and 2005. Of these, 7 patients with locoregional disease and no prior radiotherapy received irinotecan plus docetaxel followed by definitive radiotherapy, 1 with photon radiotherapy and 6 with proton radiotherapy, whereas 3 patients with distant metastases and 2 with locoregional disease who had received prior radiotherapy received irinotecan plus docetaxel only. RESULTS: The most common toxicities of >or=grade 3 among the 12 patients receiving irinotecan plus docetaxel were leukopenia (33%), neutropenia (50%), febrile neutropenia (8%), and diarrhea (25%), all of which were manageable. Partial response was achieved in 3 patients, giving an overall response rate of 25%. The response rate was higher in patients aged <50 years (3 of 4 patients) compared with those aged >50 years (0 of 8 patients) (P = .018). With a median follow-up period of 22.2 months, the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 13.6 months and 36.6 months, respectively. Of the 7 patients with locoregional disease also receiving definitive radiotherapy, the 2-year survival rate was 100% and 6 patients were alive at the time of last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy for olfactory neuroblastoma with irinotecan plus docetaxel is safe and manageable. Patients aged <50 years may be sensitive to chemotherapy. Induction chemotherapy followed by definitive radiotherapy may represent a promising option for patients with locally advanced olfactory neuroblastoma.     

奥沙利铂联合5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙3周重复方案用于结直肠癌术后辅助化疗的临床观察

目的:探讨奥沙利铂(oxaliplatin,OXA)联合5-氟尿嘧啶(5-fluorouracil,5-FU)和亚叶酸钙(leucovorin,CF)3周重复方案用于结直肠癌术后辅助化疗的临床价值.方法:98例Ⅱ～Ⅲ期结直肠癌患者根治术后接受OXA联合5-FU/CF 3周重复方案辅助化疗,共化疗6个周期.患者化疗结束后每3个月进行1次全面复查,观察无病生存期及1和2年的无病生存率.结果:本组患者总的2年无病生存率为74.5%,其中Ⅱ和Ⅲ期患者的2年无病生存率分别为87.0%和63.5%.化疗期间的主要不良反应为Ⅰ～Ⅱ度外周神经毒性、中性粒细胞减少及腹泻,Ⅲ～Ⅳ度不良反应少见.结论:OXA联合5-FU/CF 3周重复方案用于结直肠癌术后辅助化疗疗效明确,患者耐受性好,是结直肠癌术后辅助化疗的理想选择.     

Combined modality therapy of rectal cancer: decreased acute toxicity with the preoperative approach.

PURPOSE: We compared the combined radiation therapy (RT) plus chemotherapy segments of two separate parallel phase I trials to determine if combined pelvic RT, fluorouracil (5-FU), and high-dose leucovorin (LV) had less acute toxicity when delivered preoperatively versus postoperatively in patients with rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with unresectable disease received preoperative RT plus LV and 5-FU followed by surgery and postoperative LV and 5-FU. Patients with resectable disease received identical doses, techniques, and schedules of RT and LV and 5-FU except all therapy was delivered postoperatively. On day 1, patients received LV and 5-FU times one cycle. RT began on day 8. A second cycle of LV and 5-FU was given concurrently with the fourth week of RT. RESULTS: Although more patients (75% v 32%; P = .02) received the higher dose level of 5-FU (250 mg/m2), significantly fewer experienced acute grade 3 to 4 toxicity with preoperative versus postoperative therapy (13% v 48%; P = .045). There was no grade 3 to 4 myelosuppression in either group. The two grade 3 toxicities in the preoperative group were gastrointestinal. The grade 3 toxicities in the postoperative group included seven gastrointestinal and two genitourinary; four patients had a grade 4 toxicity. CONCLUSION: Given the high incidence of grade 3 to 4 toxicity also reported in the postoperative combined modality adjuvant randomized trials, future adjuvant trials should explore the preoperative approach.     

Adjuvant oral 5-fluorouracil for cervical cancer: Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group report

Japanese women with low-stage cervical cancer receiving radical hysterectomy and radiotherapy have a good 5-year survival rate. However, women with risk factors such as nodal metastasis may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, which was studied in women having surgery alone or surgery plus radiotherapy. Patients having surgery alone (S) (n=623) or surgery and radiotherapy (SR) (n=919) were randomly assigned to receive or not receive oral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for 1 year. The effect of various factors on survival was studied by multivariate analysis. Patients who received S obtained no benefit from 5-FU, whereas 5-FU-treated SR patients had significantly better 5-year survival than those not receiving chemotherapy (P=0.043). The SR patients without nodal metastases had a better survival rate if they received 5-FU (P<0.001), whereas those with nodal metastases did not. Oral 5-FU after radical hysterectomy with radiotherapy appears useful for patients with low-stage cervical cancer who have some risk factors but not for those with pelvic lymph node metastases.     

Chemotherapy permits resection of metastatic colorectal cancer: experience from Intergroup N9741.

BACKGROUND: Fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin and irinotecan combinations improve time to tumor progression (TTP), objective response and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). Here we identify and describe patients treated on Intergroup study N9741 who initially had inoperable MCRC, but who obtained sufficient chemotherapeutic benefit to allow removal of their metastatic disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patient research records in study arms (A) irinotecan/5-FU/leucovorin (LV) (IFL, n = 264), (F) oxaliplatin/5-FU/LV (FOLFOX4, n = 267) and (G) oxaliplatin/irinotecan (IROX, n = 265) were reviewed. TTP and median OS were calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-four (3.3%) of 795 randomized patients underwent curative metastatic disease resection [hepatectomy, 16; radiofrequency-ablation (RFA), six; lung resection, two]. Twenty-two out of 24 (92%) resected patients received an oxaliplatin-based regimen (FOLFOX4, 11; IROX, 11). Seven patients (29.2%) remain disease-free; relapses occurred mainly in the resected organ. Median OS in resected patients is 42.4 months, and median TTP is 18.4 months. All six patients treated with RFA have recurred. Four out of five (80%) patients who received chemotherapy following resection are disease-free. CONCLUSIONS: Resection of metastatic disease after chemotherapy is possible in a small but important subset of patients with MCRC, particularly after receiving an oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy regimen, with encouraging OS and TTP observed in these highly selected patients.     

Comparison of oral capecitabine versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment in 605 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase III study.

PURPOSE: To compare the response rate, efficacy parameters, and toxicity profile of oral capecitabine with bolus intravenous (IV) fluorouracil plus leucovorin (5-FU/LV) as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively randomized 605 patients to treatment with oral capecitabine for 14 days every 3 weeks or 5-FU/LV by rapid IV injection daily for 5 days in 4-week cycles. RESULTS: The overall objective tumor response rate among all randomized patients was significantly higher in the capecitabine group (24.8%) than in the 5-FU/LV group (15.5%; P =.005). In the capecitabine and 5-FU/LV groups, median times to disease progression were 4.3 and 4.7 months (log-rank P =.72), median times to treatment failure were 4.1 and 3.1 months (P =.19), and median overall survival times were 12.5 and 13.3 months (P =.974), respectively. Capecitabine, compared with bolus 5-FU/LV treatment, produced a significantly lower incidence (P <.0002) of diarrhea, stomatitis, nausea, and alopecia. Patients treated with capecitabine also displayed lower incidences of grade 3/4 stomatitis and grade 3/4 neutropenia (P <.0001) leading to significantly less neutropenic fever/sepsis. Grade 3 hand-foot syndrome (P <.00001) and grade 3/4 hyperbilirubinemia were the only toxicities more frequently associated with capecitabine than with 5-FU/LV treatment. CONCLUSION: Oral capecitabine was more active than 5-FU/LV in the induction of objective tumor responses. Time to disease progression and survival were at least equivalent for capecitabine compared with the 5-FU/LV arm. Capecitabine also demonstrated clinically meaningful benefits over bolus 5-FU/LV in terms of tolerability.     

术后辅助治疗对局部进展期（pT3N0M0）食管鳞癌远期生存影响的回顾性分析

  目的  探讨术后辅助治疗对于pT3N0M0食管鳞癌患者远期生存的影响。  方法  回顾性分析兰州大学第二医院2010年1月至2014年4月收治的食管鳞癌患者资料,并分为4组:单纯手术组,手术+放疗组,手术+化疗组,手术+放化疗组。收集患者的临床病理资料及远期随访结果。  结果  2010年1月至2014年4月共纳入177例患者,中位年龄61（43~78）岁。其中单纯手术组79例,术后辅助治疗组98例,其中手术+放疗组28例,手术+化疗组38例,手术+放化疗组32例。术后辅助治疗的总生存率和无瘤生存率均高于单纯手术组（P=0.012,P=0.007）。组间比较结果显示:手术+放疗组总生存率和无瘤生存率高于单纯手术组（P=0.038,P=0.011）,手术+放化疗组仅总生存率高于单纯手术组（P=0.031）。  结论  pT3N0M0食管鳞癌患者可以从术后辅助放疗和放化疗中获益,尤其放疗可以达到局部区域控制的显著效果。