Factor V leiden and venous thromboembolism in a woman taking second generation oral contraceptives: a case report]

The most common cause of thrombophilia is a point mutation in factor V gene (G1691A), leading to factor V Leiden synthesis, which is resistant to the inhibition by activated protein C. Administration of oral contraceptives is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism in carriers of factor V Leiden mutation. We describe here a case of 44-year-old woman who developed right popliteal and superficial deep vein thrombosis after a 2-month use of a contraceptive which consists of 0.15 mg levonorgestrel and 0.03 mg ethynylestradiol. The mutation G1691A of factor V gene was detected with the polymerase chain reaction. No other inherited or acquired risk factors for thrombosis was found in this patient. Treatment with low molecular weight heparin and subsequently, oral anticoagulation was effective. Women with factor V Leiden should be discouraged from taking oral contraceptives. Screening for factor V Leiden in these women appears to be useful and contribute to the prevention of thrombosis in risk situations.     

The factor V leiden mutation and the risk of venous thromboembolism in gynecologic oncology patients1

OBJECTIVE: To measure the strength of the association between the factor V Leiden mutation and venous thromboembolism in gynecologic oncology patients. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study of gynecologic cancer patients in a referral center who were group matched for demographics, tumor type, and treatment. The prevalence of the factor V Leiden mutation was determined in both cases and controls, and an odds ratio was calculated. The factor V Leiden mutation was detected using polymerase chain reaction amplification and nucleic acid restriction digest of deoxyribonucleic acid extracted from leukocytes. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were enrolled in the study. Seventy-four samples were available for analysis. There were no differences between the cases and controls with respect to age, race, body mass index, smoking, cancer type, high stage (III or IV) of cancer, or treatment modality. The odds ratio for having the factor V Leiden mutation in patients with venous thromboembolism was 0.3 (95% confidence interval 0.1, 1.7). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the factor V Leiden mutation is not associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism in gynecologic oncology patients. This contrasts with other studies showing a strong association between the factor V Leiden mutation and venous thromboembolism in cases of previously unexplained venous thromboembolism, and venous thromboembolism associated with other hypercoagulable states, such as pregnancy and oral contraceptive use. The risk of venous thromboembolism due to cancer outweighs the contribution of the factor V Leiden mutation.     

Factor V Leiden mutation: the most commonly inherited risk factor for venous thromboembolism

Factor V Leiden mutation is a common genetic risk factor for venous thrombosis. It has been documented in up to 65% of patients with unexplained venous thromboembolism. This genetic mutation is now known to be the most common inherited cause of activated protein C (APC) resistance. Recently, FV Leiden mutation has been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes (including recurrent fetal loss, severe preeclampsia, placental abruption, intrauterine growth restriction and stillbirth), in addition to venous thromboembolic disorders. In this article, we discuss the genetic basis, diagnosis and clinical significance of FV Leiden mutation. Awareness of the clinical manifestations associated with FV Leiden mutation should ensure screening of appropriate populations and prophylaxis against thromboembolic disease when indicated.     

Multiple phlebothrombosis following cesarean section due to heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation detected post partum

Activated protein C resistance in factor V Leiden mutation is currently the most frequent hereditary defect accompanied by high risk of thromboembolism. Thromboembolism often develops in the presence of additional risk factors such as pregnancy, birth, taking oral contraceptives, immobilization and surgical operations. A case of multiple phlebothrombosis following caesarean section in heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation evidenced post partum is reported. The patient developed extensive phlebothrombosis in both legs on postoperative day three despite preventive thrombosis treatment with low-molecular heparin. She also suffered from short-term incomplete paresis of her left arm and epileptic seizure with typical grand mal symptoms. MRI showed partial thrombosis of the superior sagittal sinus and the transverse sinus.     

Are factor V Leiden carriers who use oral contraceptives at extreme risk for venous thromboembolism?

BACKGROUND: Major concern was raised by an earlier study regarding oral contraceptive use in women with the factor V Leiden mutation. A more than 30-fold increase in relative risk for venous thromboembolism was reported; for homozygotes, the relative risk was as much as 100-fold or more. OBJECTIVE: To replicate the reported risk estimates with a new population-based case-control study. METHODS: Eighty women with a diagnosis of venous thromboembolism were consecutively identified and compared with population-based controls (n = 406). Factor V Leiden mutation was identified by genotype analysis. The evaluation was performed with conditional logistic regression (matched for 5-year age group). RESULTS: Matched, adjusted odds ratios (OR) for idiopathic venous thromboembolism in women without and with the factor V Leiden mutation who used oral contraceptives were 4.1 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1-7.8) and 10.2 (95% CI 1.2-88.4), respectively. The adjusted OR for factor V Leiden carriers was 2.0 (95% CI 1.0-4.4). The OR for women with the factor V Leiden mutation and oral contraceptive use versus no factor V Leiden mutation and no oral contraceptive use was 10.2 (95% CI 3.8-27.6). CONCLUSION: The results confirm the increased relative risk of idiopathic venous thromboembolism for users of oral contraceptives and factor V Leiden carriers. However, we suspect that the true risk for women who are factor V Leiden carriers may be increased two- to four-fold rather than seven-fold or more, and that the risk for the combination of factor V Leiden and oral contraceptive use may be increased in the order often- to 15-fold rather than over 30-fold.     

Renal vein thrombosis in a newborn with prothrombotic genetic risk factors

Environmental and genetic risk factors interact to cause venous thromboembolism. Renal vein thrombosis in the newborn has been frequently associated with "risk factors" as catheters, surgery or trauma, but it has also been demonstrated a pathogenetic role of genetic prothrombotic risk factors, i.e. activated protein C resistance and FV Leiden. The treatment of neonatal venous thrombosis varies worldwide and different approaches have been proposed. We present a case of renal vein thrombosis in a female newborn with normal plasma levels of protein C, protein S and antithrombin III, but with her genotype characterized by the presence of three prothrombotic risk factors: factor V Leiden, methylentetrahydrofolate reductase and platelet glycoprotein IIIa polymorphisms. The treatment with recombinant tissue plasminogen determined complete thrombus dissolution.     

HELLP syndrome and factor V Leiden

The association of thrombophilia and obstetrical complications is documented and well consistent with the hypothesis of an insufficient placental perfusion due to fibrin deposition as a major underlying pathophysiological mechanism. Factor V Leiden is one of the most frequent thrombophilic mutations. A high prevalence of this mutation has recently been reported in a group of 21 German women with haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets (HELLP) syndrome. In this respect, we studied the prevalence of factor V Leiden in 18 women who were consecutively diagnosed at our Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology as having HELLP syndrome, between 1995 and 1999.Women were tested either at the time of diagnosis or months or years after delivery for coagulation parameters, protein C (PC), protein S (PS), antithrombin III, lupus-like anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies (ACA), activated protein C (APC) resistance and detection of the G1691A mutation (factor V Leiden). In all women, the parameters studied were normal and in none of the investigated cases was the G1691A mutation found. HELLP being a severe form of preeclampsia, we think that the reported association between factor V Leiden and HELLP may reflect the well-known association with preeclampsia.     

Heritable coagulopathies in pregnancy

Heritable coagulopathies are leading causes of maternal thromboembolism and are associated with an increased risk of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. The most common of these disorders are antithrombin III deficiency, protein C deficiency, protein S deficiency, activated protein C resistance resulting from the factor V Leiden mutation, elevated prothrombin activity associated with a mutation in the prothrombin gene, and hyperhomocystinemia. The maternal risk of a thromboembolic episode is increased by a factor of eight in the presence of any of these heritable states. In addition, the relative risk for a stillbirth in the presence of one of these disorders is 3.6. These conditions are also associated with intrauterine growth retardation and preeclampsia. Proper management of heritable coagulopathies during pregnancy is essential to reduce the risk of these serious sequelae. Patients with newly diagnosed deep-vein thromboses or pulmonary emboli should be treated with therapeutic levels of unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin, followed by subsequent prophylactic heparin therapy. All patients with a history of thromboembolism before pregnancy or evidence of any of these coagulopathies may be offered prophylactic therapy with low molecular weight heparin. Patients with antithrombin III deficiency should receive full therapeutic heparin therapy for the entire pregnancy, irrespective of their thromboembolic history. Postpartum therapy with either heparin or warfarin is required in all cases. TARGET AUDIENCE: Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After completion of this article, the reader will be able to describe the various heritable coagulopathies that can complicate pregnancy, to state the potential adverse effects of heritable coagulopathies in pregnancy, and to explain the management of heritable coagulopathies during pregnancy.     

Prevalence of thrombophilia in women with severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and cost-effectiveness of screening

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of markers of thrombophilia in patients with severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of screening for factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations in women entering an IVF program. DESIGN: Case-control study and cost-effectiveness analysis. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENT(S): Women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF complicated by severe OHSS (group 1, n = 20), women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF without development of severe OHSS (group 2, n = 40), and healthy control subjects (group 3, n = 100). INTERVENTION(S): Investigation of markers of thrombophilia. Estimate of number of IVF patients needed to detect a case of severe OHSS and thrombosis associated with thrombophilia genetic mutation was calculated from the available data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Blood samples were analyzed for inherited (resistance to activated protein C due to the factor V Leiden mutation; prothrombin G20210A mutation; deficiencies in antithrombin, protein C, and protein S) and acquired (presence of circulating lupus anticoagulants and/or anticardiolipin antibodies; deficiencies of antithrombin and protein S; acquired protein C resistance) markers of thrombophilia. The cost of preventing one thrombotic event in a patient developing severe OHSS after IVF and having factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A mutations was calculated. RESULT(S): None of the OHSS patients or controls had antithrombin, protein C, or free protein S deficiencies. All of them tested negative for antiphospholipid antibodies. No patient in group 1 had the factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A mutations. The prothrombin G20210A mutation was detected in 1 out of 40 patients (2.5%) in group 2. Both factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations were detected in two of the control subjects (2%) (group 3). The estimated cost of preventing one thrombotic event arising as a consequence of screening for factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutation is a minimum of 418,970 dollars and 2,430,000 dollars, respectively. CONCLUSION(S): The prevalence of thrombophilia is not increased in women with severe OHSS. Screening for V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutation in an IVF general population is not cost-effective.     

The relationship of the factor V Leiden mutation and pregnancy outcomes for mother and fetus

OBJECTIVE: We sought to estimate the frequency of pregnancy-related thromboembolic events among carriers of the factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation without a personal history of thromboembolism, and to evaluate the impact of maternal and fetal FVL mutation carriage or other thrombophilias on the risk of adverse outcomes. METHODS: Women with a singleton pregnancy and no history of thromboembolism were recruited at 13 clinical centers before 14 weeks of gestation from April 2000 to August 2001. Each was tested for the FVL mutation, as was the resultant conceptus after delivery or after miscarriage, when available. The incidence of thromboembolism (primary outcome), and of other adverse outcomes, was compared between FVL mutation carriers and noncarriers. We also compared adverse outcomes in a secondary nested carrier-control analysis of FVL mutation and other coagulation abnormalities. In this secondary analysis, we defined carriers as women having one or more of the following traits: carrier for FVL mutation, protein C deficiency, protein S deficiency, antithrombin III deficiency, activated protein C resistance, or lupus anticoagulant-positive, heterozygous for prothrombin G20210A or homozygous for the 5,10 methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase mutations. Carriers of the FVL mutation alone (with or without activated protein C resistance) were compared with those having one or more other coagulation abnormalities and with controls with no coagulation abnormality. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-four FVL mutation carriers were identified among 4,885 gravidas (2.7%), with both FVL mutation status and pregnancy outcomes available. No thromboembolic events occurred among the FVL mutation carriers (0%, 95% confidence interval 0-2.7%). Three pulmonary emboli and one deep venous thrombosis occurred (0.08%, 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.21%), all occurring in FVL mutation noncarriers. In the nested carrier-control analysis (n = 339), no differences in adverse pregnancy outcomes were observed between FVL mutation carriers, carriers of other coagulation disorders, and controls. Maternal FVL mutation carriage was not associated with increased pregnancy loss, preeclampsia, placental abruption, or small for gestational age births. However, fetal FVL mutation carriage was associated with more frequent preeclampsia among African-American (15.0%) and Hispanic (12.5%) women than white women (2.6%, P = .04), adjusted odds ratio 2.4 (95% confidence interval 1.0-5.2, P = .05). CONCLUSION: Among women with no history of thromboembolism, maternal heterozygous carriage of the FVL mutation is associated with a low risk of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy. Neither universal screening for the FVL mutation, nor treatment of low-risk carriers during pregnancy is indicated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.     

Thrombophilic mutations in pre-eclampsia and pregnancy-induced hypertension

AIM: The aim of the present study was to determine the existence or prevalence of thrombophilic markers such as Factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A, protein S, protein C, activated protein C and anti-thrombin in pre-eclampsia and pregnancy-induced hypertensive patients. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from a total number of 124 women at the maternity unit, University of Malaya Medical Center. These included 49 patients with pre-eclampsia, 63 patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension and 12 normal pregnant women. DNA was extracted from the blood samples. Factor V Leiden (Taq I) and prothrombin G20210A (Hind III) genotyping was done on polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. Anti-thrombin activity and the concentrations of protein C, protein S and activated protein C were measured using the IL Coagulation System (Hemosil). RESULTS: Of the 124 subjects, one pre-eclampsia patient was homozygous for Factor V Leiden mutation but prothrombin G20210A mutation was not present in any of the subjects. The subject with Factor V Leiden mutation also had a low activated protein C resistance and a low protein S concentration. CONCLUSIONS: Factor V Leiden mutation is present in the Asian population and may very well serve as one of the genetic factors responsible for pre-eclampsia and other adverse pregnancy outcomes.     

Preconception counseling for women with thrombophilia

Inherited thrombophilias are a heterogeneous group of coagulation disorders that predispose individuals to thromboembolic events. This group of conditions is the major risk factor for thromboembolism during pregnancy and the puerperium. In addition, thrombophilias have been associated with several adverse obstetric events, including pregnancy loss, preeclampsia, placental abruption, and intrauterine growth restriction. An increased risk for these obstetric complications has prompted many authorities to recommend screening and treating pregnant women for thrombophilias. Optimal obstetric management, however, is controversial as thrombophilias are common and many affected individuals are asymptomatic. Indeed, pregnancy outcome in most women with thrombophilias is normal. The most commonly identified inherited thrombophilias are the factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A gene mutations. More rare thrombophilias include protein C and S deficiencies, antithrombin III deficiency. Although relatively common, the association between hyperhomocysteinemia and associated mutations (such as the C677 T methylenetetrahydro-folate reductase) and obstetric complications is controversial.     

Severe Preeclampsia Associated with Coinheritance of Factor V Leiden Mutation and Protein S Deficiency

Background: Inherited thrombophilic disorders are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy. Preliminary research suggests that these disorders might also increase the risk for preeclampsia.Case: A 29-year-old primigravida developed severe, early onset preeclampsia and postpartum deep venous thrombosis. Subsequent testing revealed coinheritance of the factor V Leiden mutation and protein S deficiency. Heparin prophylaxis was administered during two subsequent pregnancies without recurrence of either preeclampsia or venous thromboembolism.Conclusion: Our patient’s inherited thrombophilia may have played a role in the development of preeclampsia, and anticoagulation during subsequent pregnancies may have prevented preeclampsia recurrence. An association between inherited thrombophilic disorders and preeclampsia is biologically plausible.     

Prothrombin 20210 G-->A, MTHFR C677T mutations in women with venous thromboembolism associated with pregnancy

Over 50 unselected women with maternal venous thromboembolism were screened for the prothrombin 20210 G→A and MTHFR C677T mutations, in addition to screening for other thrombophilias. The prevalence of thrombophilia in these women was compared with its prevalence in the general population in our area. The prothrombin (OR 4.4; 95% CI 1.2-16) and factor V Leiden (OR 4.5; 95% CI 2.1-14.5) mutations were more common in our patients, compared with the general population, whereas women homozygous for the C677T mutation in the methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase gene (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.13-1.58) were not. It is recommended that women with a personal or strong family history of venous thromboembolism should be screened for the prothrombin mutation either before or early in pregnancy, in addition to screening for other thrombophilias. Screening for the MTHFR mutation does not appear to identify women at increased risk of maternal venous thrombosis.     

遗传性易栓症与不良妊娠结局的研究进展

近年研究发现妊娠期易栓症的发生呈增加趋势。易栓症分为遗传性易栓症和获得性易栓症,遗传性易栓症主要与凝血基因突变所致的蛋白表达异常有关,包括因子VLeiden(FVL)、凝血酶原基因G20210A、亚甲基四氢叶酸还原酶(MTHFR)基因突变以及蛋白S(PS)、蛋白C(PC)和抗凝血酶(AT)缺乏等。凝血、抗凝及纤溶系统功能失调可引起胎盘灌注不良,不良妊娠结局如子痫前期(PE)、胎盘早剥、胎儿生长受限(FGR)和习惯性流产等可能与此有关。但遗传性易栓症是否是造成不良妊娠结局的直接因素以及预防性抗凝是否可以改善妊娠结局仍需进一步探讨。综述遗传性易栓症与不良妊娠结局的关系,评估预防性抗凝的必要性,为临床诊断和治疗提供思路。     

Inherited thrombophilia and pregnancy

Inherited thrombophilia include deficiences of antithrombin III, protein C and protein S, and the factor V Leiden mutation, the prothrombin gene variant, and homozygosity for the thermolabile variant of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR). The incidence of thromboembolism events during pregnancy and postpartum period among women with thrombophilia is not well known and depends on the prethrombotic state resulting from the interaction of the underlying thrombophilic defect(s), history of congenital thrombophilia, and additional risk factors. In that way, many patients with congenital thrombophilia will require antenatal thromboprophylaxis, the timing of which will depend on the patient's history and thrombophilic disorders. Low molecular weight heparin appeared to be a safe alternative to unfractionated heparin for both the fetus and the mother during the pregnancy. Case-control studies have recently demonstrated that serious obstetrical complications i. e severe preeclampsia, abruptio placentae, intrauterine growth restriction, and stillbirth were frequently associated with inherited thrombophilia. Controlled trials are now urgently needed to determine the possible potential benefits of anticoagulant therapy in pregnancy outcome. Finally, there is no evidence to support routine screening for congenital thrombophilia during pregnancy.     

Inherited and acquired thrombophilias and poor pregnancy outcome: should we be treating with heparin?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The most important acquired thrombophilia related to poor pregnancy outcome is probably antiphospholipid syndrome. Inherited thrombophilias that have been implicated in venous thromboembolism and poor pregnancy outcome and for which standard tests are generally available are antithrombin III deficiency, the factor V Leiden mutation, prothrombin G20210A mutation and the C677T polymorphism in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase system implicated in mild hyperhomocysteinaemia. The management of antiphospholipid syndrome with previous fetal losses is well documented and substantiated by small clinical trials. It is the purpose of this review to investigate new contributions to this field since June 2002. RECENT FINDINGS: Only one randomized trial was published during the review period, but a Cochrane review and several excellent review articles appeared detailing management. SUMMARY: There is a dire lack of randomized trials in the literature on the efficacy of heparin or other coagulation modulators on pregnancy outcome in patients with inherited thrombophilias. There is consensus on thrombo-prophylaxis for antiphospholipid syndrome. Protocols for the management of venous thromboembolism and pulmonary emboli related to pregnancy are well established.     

How strong is the association between maternal thrombophilia and adverse pregnancy outcome? A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether inherited and acquired thrombophilias are associated with adverse obstetric complications. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review; studies where women with adverse obstetric complications were tested for one or more acquired and inherited thrombophilias were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of thrombophilia in women with severe pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, severe placental abruption, intrauterine growth restriction or unexplained stillbirth. RESULTS: Compared with controls, placental abruption was more often associated with homozygous and heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation, heterozygous G20210A prothrombin gene mutation, homocysteinaemia, activated protein C resistance or anticardiolipin IgG antibodies. Women with pre-eclampsia/eclampsia were more likely to have heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation, heterozygous G20210A prothrombin gene mutation, homozygous MTHFR C677T mutation, protein C deficiency, protein S deficiency or activated protein C resistance compared with controls. Unexplained stillbirth, when compared with controls, was more often associated with heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation, protein S deficiency, activated protein C resistance, anticardiolipin IgG antibodies or lupus anticoagulant. Women with intrauterine growth restriction had a higher prevalence of heterozygous G20210A prothrombin gene mutation, homozygous MTHFR C677T gene mutation, protein S deficiency or anticardiolipin IgG antibodies than controls. There was wide heterogeneity in the prevalence of thrombophilia between the studies. CONCLUSIONS: Women with adverse pregnancy outcome are more likely to have a positive thrombophilia screen but studies published so far are too small to adequately assess the true size of this association. Screening for thrombophilia should not become standard practice until clear evidence emerges that thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy improves perinatal outcome. Further research into the link between the observed association, causality and heterogeneity is required.     

Pathologic features of the placenta in women with severe pregnancy complications and thrombophilia.

OBJECTIVE: To compare placental pathology between women with and without thrombophilia who had severe preeclampsia, intrauterine growth retardation, severe abruptio placentae, or stillbirth. METHODS: After delivery, 68 women with singleton pregnancies with one of the above complications were evaluated for an inherited thrombophilia: factor V Leiden, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase and prothrombin gene mutation, and deficiencies of protein S, protein C, and antithrombin III. Thirty-two women were thrombophilic (group A), and 36 women were not (group B). There was no difference in maternal age, parity, and type of pregnancy complication. A single pathologist examined each placenta. RESULTS: The gestational age at delivery, birth weight, and placental weight were significantly lower in group A. Three parameters showed significant differences between the groups: thrombophilic women had a higher number of villous infarcts (P <.01), more multiple infarcts (P <.05), and a higher incidence of placentas with fibrinoid necrosis of decidual vessels (P <.05). CONCLUSION: Placentas of women with severe complications and thrombophilia have an increased rate of vascular lesions.