Triglyceride-Glucose Index as a Surrogate Marker of Insulin Resistance for Predicting Cardiovascular Outcomes in Nondiabetic Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Aim: The triglyceride-glucose index (TyG index) is proposed as a surrogate parameter for insulin resistance (IR) and, when elevated, is related to increased cardiovascular risks. Whether the TyG index is of great value in predicting adverse prognosis for individuals diagnosed with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), who received elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and without recognized diabetes remains unclear. Methods: Overall, 1,510 subjects diagnosed with NSTE-ACS, who received elective PCI, and without recognized diabetes were enrolled in the current study. All participants received a routine follow-up after discharge. The TyG index was obtained from the following equation: napierian logarithmic (ln) [fasting triglyceride (TG, mg/dL)×fasting blood glucose (FBG, mg/dL)/2]. Adverse cardiovascular events included all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal ischemic stroke, and ischemia-driven revascularization, composite of which was defined as the primary endpoint. Results: Overall, 316 (20.9%) endpoint events were documented during a 48-month follow-up. Despite adjusting for confounding variates, the TyG index remains to be a significant risk predictor for the primary endpoint, with a hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] of 2.433 (1.853-3.196) ( P ＜0.001). A significant enhancement on the predictive performance for the primary endpoint emerged when adding the TyG index into a baseline model [area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), 0.835 for baseline model vs. 0.853 for baseline model＋TyG index, P ＜0.001; net reclassification improvement (NRI), 0.194, P ＜0.001; integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), 0.023, P =0.007]. Conclusions: The TyG index is an independent risk predictor for adverse cardiovascular events in nondiabetic subjects diagnosed with NSTE-ACS and who received elective PCI. Further prospective studies are needed to verify these findings.     

Impact of Stress Hyperglycemia on No-Reflow Phenomenon in Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background:Stress hyperglycemia is a common finding during acute myocardial infarction and associated with poor prognosis. To reduce the occurrence of no-reflow, prognostic factors must be identified before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Our objective was to investigate the impact of stress hyperglycemia in non-diabetic and diabetic patients on no-reflow phenomenon after PPCI.Methods:The study comprised 480 patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who were managed by PPCI. Patients were classified into two groups according to thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade: Group I (Patients with normal flow, TIMI 3 flow) and Group II (Patients with no-reflow, TIMI 0-2 flow). Patients were analyzed for clinical outcomes including mortality and major adverse cardiac events.Results:Incidence of stress hyperglycemia was 14.8% in non-diabetic patients and 22.2% in diabetic patients; the incidence of no-reflow phenomenon was 13.5% and no-reflow was significantly higher in patients with stress hyperglycemia. Multivariate regression analysis identified the independent predictors of no-reflow phenomenon: stress hyperglycemia OR 3.247 (CI95% 1.656–6.368, P = 0.001), Killip class >1 OR 1.893 (CI95% 1.004–3.570, P = 0.049) and cardiogenic shock OR 3.778 (CI95% 1.458–9.790, P = 0.006).Conclusion:Stress hyperglycemia was associated with higher incidence of no-reflow phenomenon. The independent predictors of no-reflow were stress hyperglycemia, Killip class >1 and cardiogenic shock.     

Predictors of 6-month Mortality in Patients with Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Study in Pakistani Population

ObjectivesFor Southern Asian countries like Pakistan, there is inadequate evidence of risk factors associated with mortality in patients suffering from acute coronary syndrome (ACS), especially non-ST elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS) cases. Therefore, aim of this study was to evaluate predictors of 6-months mortality of patients presenting with NSTE-ACS.MethodsFor this prospective observational study we recruited adult patients diagnosed with NSTE-ACS at a tertiary cardiac center. All he patients were followed-up after six months and survival status was recorded. Logistic regression analysis was performed for six-month mortality and odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported.ResultsSix-month follow-up was successful for 280 patients. On univariate analysis age >65 years, increased heart rate, cardiac arrest at presentation, Killip class II–IV at presentation, and diabetes were found to be associated with increased risk of 6-months mortality with OR [95% CI] of 4.27 [1.9–9.58], 1.25 [1.1–1.41], 139.44 [16.9–1150.78], 68.45 [7.88–594.41], and 2.35 [1.06–5.22] respectively. On multivariable analysis Killip class II–IV at presentation, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) score of >4, and global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE) score ≥150 were found to be independent predictors of mortality after six months of NSTE-ACS with adjusted OR of 32.93 [2.65–408.8], 3.42 [1.35–8.66], and 8.43 [3.33–21.38] respectively.ConclusionsFor patients with NSTE-ACS, our study showed seven clinical parameters to be associated with an increased risk of 6-month mortality. These included increasing age, increased heart rate, cardiac arrest at presentation, Killip class II–IV, diabetes, TIMI score of >4 and GRACE score of >150. Thereby aiding clinicians to apply strategic and precise interventions in monitoring these patients accordingly.     

Elevated Glycated Albumin in Serum Is Associated with Adverse Cardiac Outcomes in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Who Underwent Revascularization Therapy

Aims: The associations between increased glycated albumin (GA) in the serum and diabetic complications and mortality have been revealed in the general population. However, less is known regarding the prognostic value of GA in patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: In this study, all patients admitted for ACS who underwent a successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at our center from January 2018 to February 2019 were retrospectively examined. Clinical characteristics, laboratory results (e.g., serum GA levels), and procedural details were collected. The primary outcome included a composite of major adverse cardio-cerebral events (MACCE), such as death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and unplanned revascularization. The association between serum GA levels and clinical outcomes was tested in three multivariable models using Cox proportional hazard analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed in patients who were diagnosed with diabetes versus patients without diabetes. Results: A total of 1,806 ACS patients (mean age of 59.4 years; 77.8% were men; 44.9% were diagnosed with diabetes) were enrolled in this study, where the majority exhibited unstable angina (81.6%) and showed preserved left ventricular systolic function. Patients in the high GA level group were commonly female and were more likely to have metabolic disorders and to exhibit severe CAD (all p ＜0.05). MACCE occurred in 126 patients (7.0%) during a mean follow-up time of 17.2 months. The cumulative risk of MACCE at the 18-month follow-up visit significantly increased in a stepwise fashion along with increased GA levels (log-rank p =0.018) in the serum. The association between serum GA levels and MACCE was further determined after adjusting traditional risk factors and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (GA, per 1% increase: hazard ratio [HR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06–1.13; GA, higher vs. lower tertial: HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.01–3.67). In a subgroup analysis, the prognostic role of serum GA only existed in diabetic patients, even when adjusting for traditional risk factors and HbA1c levels. Conclusions: Elevated GA levels in the serum were associated with poor intermediate-term outcomes in low-risk ACS patients who underwent PCI, especially in patients with preexisting diabetes.     

Impact of time factor and patient characteristics on the efficacy of PCI vs CABG for left main coronary disease: A meta-analysis

Background:The impact of time factor and patient characteristics on the efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents vs. coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) for left main coronary disease is unclear.Methods:We searched PubMed and Embase for related trials. Two outcomes of interest were major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE, defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned revascularization) and a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke. We conducted random-effects meta-analysis stratified by follow-up duration and 7 factors of interest related to patient characteristics. Random-effects meta-regression was performed to calculate P values for trend and those for subgroup differences.Results:We included 11 articles from 5 trials. Compared with CABG, PCI increased MACCE at the end of 3-year (hazard ratio [HR] 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.40, I² = 0) and 5-year (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.20–1.48, I² = 0) follow-up, but did not increase all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The logarithm of HR of PCI vs CABG for MACCE increased as follow-up duration increased (β = 0.057, P = .025). PCI vs CABG consistently increased 5-year MACCE across various subgroups defined by 7 factors of interest (P_subgroup ranged from .156 to .830).Conclusions:The long-term benefit of CABG vs PCI on MACCE in patients with left main coronary disease is consistent across patients with different clinical characteristics. The relative benefit of CABG on MACCE is driven by that of CABG on unplanned revascularization, and becomes greater as time goes on.     

Routine Invasive Strategy in Elderly Patients with Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials

Invasive treatment with coronary angiography is preferred approach for patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) compared to medical therapy alone. The results from the randomized clinical trials (RCT) that compared the invasive treatment strategy vs. conservative approach in the elderly (≥75 years) with NSTE-ACS has been inconsistent. To compare invasive and conservative strategies in the elderly (>75 years) with NSTE-ACS. We searched PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL Register and ClinicalTrials.gov (inception through July 10, 2021) for RCTs comparing invasive and conservative strategies in the elderly with NSTE-ACS. We used random-effects model to calculate risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval(CI). A total of 6 RCT including 2,323 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The median follow-up duration was 13.5 months. When invasive approach was compared to conservative strategy, it showed no difference in all-cause mortality in patients aged ≥75 years with NSTE-ACS (RR of 0.85; 95% CI 0.70–1.04; P = 0.12; I2 = 0%). There was significant reduction in MI (RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.49 0.71; P < 0.001; I2 = 0%) and unplanned revascularization (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.17-0.53, P <0.001, I2 = 0%). Invasive strategy was associated with higher risk of major bleeding when compared to conservative treatment (RR 2.12, 95% CI 1.21-3.74, P = 0.009, I2 = 0%). Comparison of both strategies showed no significant difference in stroke (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.38-1.46, P = 0.40; I2 = 0%). This updated meta-analysis suggests that in elderly patients (>75 years) with NSTE-ACS, a routine invasive strategy is associated with a reduction in MI and revascularization, while increasing the risk of major bleeding, but without difference in all-cause mortality and stroke.     

Is off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting superior to drug-eluting stents for the treatment of coronary artery disease? A meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized studies

Background

As drug-eluting stent (DES) has almost overcome the disadvantage of frequent restenosis, off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) has been introduced to avoid complications of cardiopulmonary bypass. However, which approach may promise better outcomes for patients with coronary artery disease remains controversial.

Methods

Three databases were searched. The outcomes of interest were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), all-cause death, target vessel revascularization (TVR), repeat revascularization (RRV), myocardial infarction (MI), and cerebrovascular events (CVE). The relative risk (RR) was calculated as the summary statistic.

Results

11,452 patients from 22 studies were included, of which 4949 patients underwent OPCAB and 6503 patients received DES. The cumulative rates of MACCE (RR [95% CI] = 0.43 [0.34, 0.54], P < 0.00001), all-cause death (RR [95% CI] = 0.56 [0.33, 0.96], P = 0.03), TVR (RR [95% CI] = 0.33 [0.21, 0.53], P < 0.00001), RRV (RR [95% CI] = 0.22 [0.11, 0.42], P < 0.00001) and MI (RR [95% CI] = 0.13 [0.05, 0.29], P < 0.00001) at 3 years were all lower in OPCAB group. The incidences of in-hospital death (RR [95% CI] = 1.31 [0.81, 2.13], P = 0.27) and MI (RR [95% CI] = 1.03 [0.60, 1.78], P = 0.92) were not different between groups, but the rate of in-hospital CVE was lower (RR [95% CI] = 2.6355 [1.0033, 6.9228], P = 0.05) in DES group.

Conclusions

OPCAB presents better long-term outcomes of MACCE, all-cause mortality, TVR, RRV and MI but uncertain outcome of postoperative CVE without influencing the incidences of in-hospital death and MI.     

The Priority of Non-HDL-C Assessment to Predict New Lesions among Stable Angina Patients with Strong Statins

Aim: In this study, we aim to examine the clinical meaning of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ＜70 mg/dL as assessed by Friedewald equation [LDL-C (F)] and Martin method [LDL-C (M)] and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ＜100 mg/dL on the occurrence of new lesions among Japanese patients with stable angina who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and were prescribed with strong statins. Methods: Among the 537 consecutive stable angina patients who had underwent PCI and had been prescribed with strong statins, the association between the occurrence of new lesions with myocardial ischemia at the 9-month follow-up coronary angiography and ≤ 2 years after PCI and baseline characteristics were assessed. Results: New lesions appeared 9 months and ≤ 2 years after PCI in 31 and 90 patients, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed diabetes mellitus (DM) was significantly associated with the occurrence of new lesions ≤ 2 years after PCI [odds ratio (OR) 1.71, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.06–2.83,p=0.031], and only non-HDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dL was associated with the occurrence of new lesions both at 9 months and ≤ 2 years after PCI [OR 1.80, 95 % CI 1.10–3.00,p=0.021 and OR 1.85, 95 % CI 1.13–3.07,p=0.016]. Conclusions: Non-HDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dL was determined to be the independent risk factor for the occurrence of new lesions 9 months and ≤ 2 years after PCI among stable angina patients with strong statins. Residual risk after PCI should be considered by assessing not only DM but also non-HDL-C beyond the scope of LDL-C-lowering therapy with strong statins.     

CHA2DS2-VASc score predicts the slow flow/no-reflow phenomenon in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel disease (MVD) have a higher incidence of slow-flow/no-reflow (SF-NR) phenomenon during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) than those with single vessel disease. Currently, no effective tools exist to predict the risk of SF-NR in this population. The present study aimed to evaluate whether CHA₂DS₂-VASc score can be used as a simple tool to predict this risk.This study consecutively included STEMI patients hospitalized in Beijing Anzhen Hospital from January 2005 to January 2015. Among these patients, 1032 patients with MVD were finally enrolled. Patients were divided into SF-NR (+) group and SF-NR (–) group according to whether SF-NR occurred during PPCI. SF-NR was defined as the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade ≤2.There were 134 patients (13%) in the SF-NR (+) group. Compared with the SF-NR (–) group, patients in the SF-NR (+) group are elder, with lower left ventricular ejection fraction and higher CHA₂DS₂-VASc score. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥3 (odds ratio [OR], 2.148; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.389–3.320; P = .001), current smoking (OR, 1.814; 95% CI, 1.19–2.764; P = .006), atrial fibrillation (OR, 2.892; 95% CI, 1.138–7.350; P = .03), complete revascularization (OR, 2.307; 95% CI, 1.202–4.429; P = .01), and total length of stents ≥40 mm (OR, 1.482; 95% CI, 1.011–2.172; P = .04) were independent risk factors of SF-NR. The incidence of SF-NR in patients with CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥3 was 1.7 times higher than that in patients with CHA₂DS₂-VASc score <3. Additionally, patients with CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥3 plus ≥2 risk factors have 3 times higher incidence of SF-NR than those with CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥3 plus 0 to 1 risk factor.CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥3 can be used as a simple and sensitive indicator to predict SF-NR phenomenon and guide the PPCI strategy in STEMI patients with MVD.     

Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Aim: The efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain uncertain. Thus, this study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with SCAD treated with PCI. Methods: A total of 9,379 patients with SCAD undergoing PCI who received dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) were consecutively enrolled in two groups, namely, ticagrelor ( n =1,081) and clopidogrel ( n =8,298) groups. Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) and bleeding events according to ticagrelor or clopidogrel use were compared. Results: After propensity matching ( n =1,081 in each group), ticagrelor was associated with fewer MACCEs compared with clopidogrel (3.6% vs. 5.7%, hazard ratio [HR]=0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41–0.93, p =0.019), and the difference between ticagrelor and clopidogrel for bleeding events was nonsignificant (4.0% vs. 3.2%, HR=1.24, 95% CI 0.79-1.93, p =0.356). On the other hand, the difference between ticagrelor and clopidogrel for net adverse clinical events was significant (4.1% vs. 6.0%, HR=0.67, 95% CI 0.46–0.98, p =0.039). In a multivariate analysis, the use of ticagrelor, number of stents, previous history of diabetes, previous history of smoking, and ACC/AHA type B2 or C lesions were considered independent predictors of MACCEs, while radial artery access, previous history of stroke, and weight ＜60kg were independent predictors of bleeding events. Conclusions Ticagrelor was associated with a lower incidence of MACCEs without an increased risk of bleeding events in patients with SCAD receiving PCI.     

The sST2 level is an independent influencing factor associated with atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients: a case-control study

BackgroundMost heart failure (HF) patients were complicated with atrial fibrillation (AF). Previous study has reported a correlation between soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) and HF. While the association between sST2 and AF in HF patients remains elusive, which will strengthen our understanding of sST2 in HF patients.MethodsIn the study, a case-control study was conducted with 306 HF patients enrolled from June 2019 to June 2020 at Beijing Anzhen Hospital. All the patients were divided into the following two groups, based on whether they AF complications prior to admission: (I) the HF group (patients with HF alone) and the HF-AF group (HF patients complicated with AF). Baseline data and sST2 levels were assessed and compared between the two groups, and the influencing factors associated with AF in HF patients were screened.ResultsThe sST2 level in the HF-AF group was 40.6 (25.9–53.6) ng/mL, which was significantly higher than that in the HF group [23.7 (16.3–35.9) ng/mL] (P<0.001). Correlation analysis showed that sST2 level in the HF-AF group was positively correlated with age (r=0.287, P=0.001), New York Heart Association (NYHA) grade (r=0.470, P<0.0001), left ventricular diameter (LVD) (r=0.311, P=0.001), serum creatinine (r=0.320, P<0.0001), NT-pro-brain natriuretic peptide (r=0.540, P<0.0001), and D-dimer (r=0.322, P<0.0001), and negatively correlated with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (r=−0.259, P=0.004), hemoglobin (r=−0.188, P=0.039), and glomerular filtration rate (r=−0.283, P=0.002). Logistic regression analysis results indicated that history of coronary heart disease [odds ratio (OR): 0.176, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.081–0.380, P<0.0001], LVEF (OR: 0.956, 95% CI: 0.915–0.998, P=0.039), LVD (OR: 1.156, 95% CI: 1.059–1.261, P=0.001), left arterial diameter (OR: 0.761, 95% CI: 0.695–0.833, P<0.0001), and sST2 (OR: 0.942, 95% CI: 0.917–0.967, P<0.0001) were independent influencing factors associated with AF in HF patients.ConclusionsThe sST2 level is an independent influencing factor associated with AF in HF patients, which may favor to optimize the clinical strategies in the management of HF patients complicated with AF.     

Cilostazol combined with P2Y12 receptor inhibitors: A substitute antiplatelet regimen for aspirin‐intolerant patients undergoing percutaneous coronary stent implantation

BackgroundCilostazol combined with P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibitor has been used as a substitute regimen for aspirin‐intolerant patients undergoing percutaneous coronary stent implantation on a small scale. Its exact impact on platelet functions and clinical benefits of aspirin‐intolerant patients is unknown.HypothesisCilostazol combined with P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibitors could be used as a substitute antiplatelet regimen for aspirin‐intolerant patients undergoing percutaneous coronary stent implantation.MethodsIn this multicenter prospective cohort trial, patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary stent implantation were assigned to the cilostazol group (cilostazol plus P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibitors), based on aspirin intolerance criteria, or the aspirin group (aspirin plus P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibitors). Platelet PAC‐1, CD62p, and vasodilator‐stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation (VASP‐P) were detected by flow cytometry. The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) including all‐cause death, acute myocardial infarction, emerging arrhythmia, nonfatal stroke, and heart failure. The secondary endpoints were the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) bleeding events.ResultsOne hundred and fifty‐four aspirin‐intolerant percutaneous coronary stent implantation patients and 154 matched aspirin‐tolerant patients from a total of 2059 percutaneous coronary stent implantation patients were enrolled. The relative activation level of PAC‐1, CD62p, and platelet reaction index reflected by the VASP‐P test were similar in the two groups (p > .05). After 12 months of follow‐up, the incidence of all‐cause death was 1.9% in the cilostazol group and 1.3% in the aspirin group (risk ratio [RR], 1.500; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.254–8.852; p = 1.000); the incidence of acute myocardial infarction was 0.6% in the cilostazol group and 1.3% in the aspirin group (RR, 0.500; 95% CI, 0.046–5.457; p = 1.000). No significant difference was seen in other MACCE events, or in any types of BARC bleeding events.ConclusionsCilostazol combined with P2Y₁₂ inhibitors was not inferior to aspirin‐based standard therapy and could be used as a reasonable substitute antiplatelet regimen for aspirin‐intolerant patients undergoing percutaneous coronary stent implantation, but again with limitations, which required a larger sample and longer follow‐up to confirm its efficacy.     

Efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants combined with antiplatelet drugs in the treatment of coronary heart disease: Systematic evaluation and meta‐analysis

ObjectiveTo analyze the efficacy and safety of antiplatelet drugs combined with new oral anticoagulants (noac) in the treatment of coronary atherosclerotic heart disease (CAD).MethodsThe randomized controlled trials of noac combined with antiplatelet therapy in Cochrane, CNKI, PubMed, EMBASE, Wanfang, Google Scholar, and Baidu library were searched using the literature database. Two researchers independently searched and screened to ensure the consistency of the results, and the literature was summarized and analyzed by Revman 5.3 software.ResultsFive research results were included. The results showed that the incidence of mace [95% CI 0.75–0.95, or = 0.84,p = .04], the incidence of major and minor bleeding [95% CI 1.25–5.16, or = 2.54,p = .01], the mortality of cardiovascular disease [95% CI 0.78–0.96, or = 0.86, p = .05], the total mortality [95% CI 0.79–0.95, or = 0.87, p = .003], and the incidence of myocardial infarction in patients with CAD treated with noac and antiplatelet drugs [95% CI 0.77–0.95, or = 0.85, p = .004] was lower than that treated with antiplatelet drugs alone, and the difference was statistically significant (p < .05); the incidence of fatal bleeding [95% CI 0.81–2.08, or = 1.30, p = .28], the incidence of stroke [95% CI 0.50–1.03, or = 0.71, p = .07], and the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage [95% CI 1.02–2.56, or = 1.61, p = .06]. There was no significant difference with antiplatelet drugs alone (p > .05).ConclusionNoac combined with antiplatelet drugs can reduce mace, total mortality, the incidence of myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular mortality in patients with CAD, but may increase the risk of bleeding.     

Percutaneous coronary intervention and 30‐day unplanned readmission with chest pain in the United States (Nationwide Readmissions Database)

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves anginal chest pain in most, but not all, treated patients. PCI is associated with unplanned readmission for angina and non‐specific chest pain within 30‐days of index PCI. Patients with an index hospitalization for PCI between January–November in each of the years 2010–2014 were included from the United States Nationwide Readmissions Database. Of 2 723 455 included patients, the 30‐day unplanned readmission rate was 7.2% (n = 196 581, 42.3% female). This included 9.8% (n = 19 183) with angina and 11.1% (n = 21 714) with non‐specific chest pain. The unplanned readmission group were younger (62.2 vs 65.1 years; P < 0.001), more likely to be females (41.0% vs 34.2%; P < 0.001), from the lowest quartile of household income (32.9% vs 31.2%; P < 0.001), have higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors or have index PCI performed for non‐acute coronary syndromes (ACS) (OR:3.46, 95%CI 3.39–3.54). Factors associated with angina readmissions included female sex (OR:1.28, 95%CI 1.25–1.32), history of ischemic heart disease (IHD) (OR:3.28, 95%CI 2.95–3.66), coronary artery bypass grafts (OR:1.79, 95%CI 1.72–2.86), anaemia (OR:1.16, 95%CI 1.11–1.21), hypertension (OR:1.13, 95%CI 1.09, 1.17), and dyslipidemia (OR:1.10, 95%CI 1.06–1.14). Non‐specific chest pain compared with angina readmissions were younger (mean difference 1.25 years, 95% CI 0.99, 1.50), more likely to be females (RR:1.13, 95%CI 1.10, 1.15) and have undergone PCI for non‐ACS (RR:2.17, 95%CI 2.13, 2.21). Indications for PCI other than ACS have a greater likelihood of readmission with angina or non‐specific chest pain at 30‐days. Readmissions are more common in patients with modifiable risk factors, previous history of IHD and anaemia.     

Clinical Outcomes of Revascularization Strategies for Patients With MVD/LMCA Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR), a new minimally invasive procedure for patients requiring revascularization for multivessel coronary lesions, combines coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for left anterior descending (LAD) lesions and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non-LAD coronary lesions. However, available data related to outcomes comparing the 3 revascularization therapies is limited to small studies.We conducted a search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library of Controlled Trials up to December 31, 2014, without language restriction. A total of 16 randomized trials (n=4858 patients) comparing HCR versus PCI or off-pump CABG (OPCAB) were included in this meta-analysis. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular events (CVE), and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effect and fixed-effect models. Ranking probabilities were used to calculate a summary numerical value: the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve.No significant differences were seen between the HCR and PCI in short term (in hospital and 30 days) with regard to MACCE (odds ratio [OR] = 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.00–2.35), all-cause death (OR = 2.09, 95% CI 0.34–7.66), MI (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.19–2.95), CVE (OR = 4.45, 95% CI 0.39–19.16), and TVR (OR = 6.99, 95% CI 0.17–39.39). However, OPCAB had lower MACCE than HCR (OR = 0.19, 95% CI 0.00–0.95). In midterm (1 year and 3 year), in comparison with HCR, PCI had higher all-cause death (OR = 5.66, 95% CI 0.00–13.88) and CVE (OR = 4.40, 95% CI 0.01–5.68), and lower MI (OR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.00–2.86), TVR (OR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.05–2.26), and thus the MACCE (OR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.00–2.35). Off-pump CABG presented a better outcome than HCR with significant lower MACCE (OR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.01–0.68). Surface under the cumulative ranking probabilities showed that HCR may be the superior strategy for MVD and LMCA disease when regarded to MACCE (SUCRA = 0.84), MI (SUCRA = 0.76) in short term, and regarded to MACCE (SUCRA = 0.99), MI (SUCRA = 0.94), and CVE (SUCRA = 0.92) in midterm.Hybrid coronary revascularization seemed to be a feasible and acceptable option for treatment of LMCA disease and MVD. More powerful evidences are required to precisely evaluate risks and benefits of the 3 therapies for patients who have different clinical characteristics.     

Percutaneous coronary intervention in insulin‐treated diabetic patients: A meta‐analysis

BackgroundThis meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared long‐term adverse clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in insulin‐treated diabetes mellitus (ITDM) and non‐ITDM patients.MethodsThis is a meta‐analysis study. The PubMed and Embase databases were searched for articles on long‐term adverse clinical outcomes of PCI in ITDM and non‐ITDM patients. The risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.ResultsA total of 11 related RCTs involving 8853 DM patients were included. Compared with non‐ITDM patients, ITDM patients had significantly higher all‐cause mortality (ACM) (RR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.25–1.85, p _{heterogeneity} = .689, I ² = 0%), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (RR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.18–1.55, p _{heterogeneity} = .57, I ² = 0%), myocardial infarction (MI) (RR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.16–1.72, p _{heterogeneity} = .962, I ² = 0%), and stent thrombosis (ST) (RR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.23–2.48, p _{heterogeneity} = .159, I ² = 32.4%). No significant difference was found in the target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) between the ITDM and non‐ITDM groups.ConclusionsThe results showed that ITDM patients had significantly higher ACM, MACCE, MI, and ST, compared with non‐ITDM patients.     

Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Predicts Vulnerable Plaque in Patients with Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

BackgroundIdentifying a novel biomarker may contribute to detection of vulnerable plaque in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between serum platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and vulnerable plaque in patients with moderate and low risk of NSTE-ACS.MethodsA total of 65 moderate- and low-risk NSTE-ACS patients with 50–90% coronary stenosis were divided into a vulnerable plaque group (n=46) and a stable plaque group (n=19) according to intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) examinations. Total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and serum PDGF were measured. Plaque characteristics and components were analyzed using gray-scale and iMap-IVUS. Correlation was performed between plaque characteristics and ACS markers. Logistic regression analysis was applied to determine risk factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the predictive value.ResultsPatients with vulnerable plaque had visible higher levels of TG, LDL-C and PDGF (P < 0.05). There were significant differences in minimal lumen area (MLA), plaque area, plaque burden, fibrotic (FI), clipidic (LI) and necrotic core (NC) between the two groups (P < 0.05). PDGF was weakly correlated with plaque burden (R = 0.428, P < 0.05), as well as moderately correlated with NC (R = 0.669, P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that serum PDGF (OR 4.751, [95% CI 1.534–9.543], P = 0.05) was an independent risk factor of vulnerable plaque. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.876 (95% CI 0.804–0.948, P=0.001).ConclusionsSerum PDGF could potentially predict vulnerable plaque in moderate and low risk of NSTE-ACS patients.     

O Escore Gensini e a Carga Trombótica Adicionam Valor Preditivo ao Escore SYNTAX na Detecção de No-Reflow após Infarto do Miocárdio

Background No-reflow after percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with poor prognosis in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). SYNTAX score is a good predictor of no-reflow.Objective We aimed to evaluate whether atherosclerotic burden (Gensini score) and thrombus burden in the culprit coronary artery would improve the ability of the SYNTAX score to detect no-reflow.Methods In this prospective cohort study, consecutive patients with STEMI who presented within 12 h of onset of symptoms were selected for this study. No-reflow was defined as TIMI flow < 3 o r TIMI flow = 3 but myocardial blush grade <2. Thrombus burden was quantified according to the TIMI thrombus grade scale (0 to 5).Results A total of 481 patients were included (mean age 61±11 years). No-reflow occurred in 32.8%. SYNTAX score (OR=1.05, 95%CI 1.01–1.08, p<0.01), thrombus burden (OR=1.17, 95%CI 1.06–1.31, p<0.01), and Gensini score (OR=1.37, 95%CI 1.13–1.65, p<0.01) were independent predictors of no-reflow. Combined scores had a larger area under the curve than the SYNTAX score alone (0.78 [0.73–0.82] vs 0.73 [0.68–0.78], p=0.03). Analyses of both categorical (0.11 [0.01–0.22], p=0.02), and continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI>0) (0.54 [0.035–0.73], p<0.001) showed improvement in the predictive ability of no-reflow in the combined model, with integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) of 0.07 (0.04–0.09, p<0.001).Conclusions Our findings suggest that, in patients with STEMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, atherosclerotic burden and thrombus burden in the culprit artery add predictive value to the SYNTAX score in detecting the no-reflow phenomenon. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0)     

Quantitative Validation of the Coronary Angioscopic Yellow Plaque with Lipid Core Burden Index Assessed by Intracoronary Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Aim: We aimed to validate the subjective and qualitative angioscopic findings by the objective and quantitative near-infrared spectroscopic (NIRS) assessment to compensate each other’s drawbacks. Methods: This is a single-center prospective observational study. Patients undergoing a planned follow-up coronary angiography after percutaneous coronary intervention were prospectively enrolled from January 2018 to April 2019. The major three vessels were examined by NIRS-intravascular ultrasound, followed by coronary angioscopic evaluation. Yellow color grade on angioscopy was classified into four grades (0, white; 1, slight yellow; 2, yellow; and 3, intensive yellow) at a location of maximal lipid core burden index over 4 mm [LCBI (4)] on NIRS in each vessel. Results: A total of 95 lesions in 44 patients (72.6±6.7 years, 75% male) were analyzed. LCBI (4) was significantly different among different yellow color grades by coronary angioscopy (ANOVA, p ＜0.001). Positive correlation was found between angioscopic yellow color grade and LCBI (4) (beta coefficient 164.8, 95% confidence interval 122.9–206.7; p ＜0.001). The best cutoff value of LCBI (4) to predict the presence of yellow plaque (yellow color grade ≥ 2) was 448 (sensitivity 79.3%, specificity 69.7%, C-statistic 0.800, 95% confidence interval 0.713–0.887, p ＜0.001). Conclusion: The qualitative angioscopic assessment was objectively validated by the quantitative NIRS evaluation, which would be helpful for the reinterpretation of the existing evidences of both imaging modalities.     

Predictors and long-term prognosis of left ventricular aneurysm in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the contemporary era

BackgroundPrimary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been the standard reperfusion strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the contemporary era. Meanwhile, the incidence and prognosis of left ventricular aneurysm (LVA) in AMI patients remain ambiguous. The aim of the current study is to identify the predictor and long-term prognosis of LVA in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction.MethodsWe prospectively enrolled 942 consecutive patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction who were treated by primary PCI. The baseline characteristics, procedural features, and one-year clinical outcomes were compared between the patients with and without LVA. The primary endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel revascularization, and ischemic stroke. Multiple logistic regression was applied to predict LVA formation and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to evaluate the accuracy of the multivariate analysis model.ResultsThe general incidence of LVA was 15.92%. At one-year clinical follow-up, patients in the LVA group had significantly higher incidence of MACCEs (15.33% vs. 6.44%, P<0.01), mainly driven by an increased incidence of cardiac death (8.00% vs. 2.78%, P<0.01), target vessel revascularization (5.33% vs. 2.27%, P=0.03), and ischemic stroke (4.00% vs. 1.39%, P=0.03). Multivariate analysis found that longer symptom-to-balloon time (S2B) [odds ratio (OR): 1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11–1.21, P<0.01], higher initial and residual SYNTAX score (iSS, OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.14–1.24, P<0.01; rSS, OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.22–1.45, P<0.01), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.11–1.18, P<0.01), and persistent ST segment elevation (OR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.06–3.38, P=0.03) were independent predictors of LVA formation.ConclusionsLVA is still common in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction in the contemporary PCI era, and the prognosis of these patients was significantly worse during the one-year clinical follow-up. Strategies of prompt reperfusion and complete revascularization may be helpful in preventing LVA formation and improving clinical outcomes.