Benefit of adaptive CT-based treatment planning in high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy for rectal cancer

PurposeIn this planning study, we investigated the dosimetric benefit of repeat CT-based treatment planning at each fraction vs. the use of a single CT-based treatment plan for all fractions for high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDREBT) for rectal cancer.Methods and MaterialsWe included 11 patients that received a CT scan with applicator in situ for all three fractions. The treatment plan of the first fraction was projected on the repeat CT scans to simulate the use of a single treatment plan. In addition, replanning was performed on the repeat CT scans, and these were compared to the corresponding projected treatment plans.ResultsRepeat CT-based treatment planning resulted on average in a 21% higher (p = 0.01) conformity index compared to single CT-based treatment planning. Projecting the initial treatment plan to the repeat CT scans of fraction two and three, 12/22 fractions reached a CTV D98 of 85% of the prescribed dose of 7 Gy, which increased to 14/22 using replanning. For the remaining fractions, median CTV D98 was 4.2 Gy, and an intervention would be necessary to correct applicator balloon setup or to remove remaining air and/or feces between the CTV and the applicator.ConclusionsUsing a single CT-based treatment plan for all fractions may result in a suboptimal treatment at later fractions. Therefore, repeat CT imaging should be the minimal standard practice in HDREBT for rectal cancer to determine whether an intervention would be necessary. Replanning based on repeat CT imaging resulted in more conformal treatment plans and is therefore recommended.     

Dosimetric and clinical outcome in image-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for anal cancer

PurposeTo evaluate dosimetric and clinical outcome in patients of anal cancer treated with image-based interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy following chemoradiation.Methods and MaterialsSixteen patients with anal cancer were treated with chemoradiation followed by brachytherapy boost with image-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy from January 2007 to June 2011. Two brachytherapy dose schedules were used: 21 Gy in seven fractions and 18 Gy in six fractions depending on response to chemoradiation. CT scan was done after placement of needles for confirmation of placement and treatment planning. Target volume was contoured on CT scans. Volumetric quality indices and dose parameters were calculated.ResultsThe mean clinical target volume was 17.7 ± 4.98 cm³, and the median overall tumor size was 4.2 cm (3.4–5 cm). The mean values of coverage index, dose homogeneity index, overdose volume index, dose non-uniformity ratio, and conformal index were 0.94, 0.83, 0.21, 0.37, and 0.88, respectively. With a median followup of 41 months (range, 20–67.2 months), preservation of the anal sphincter was achieved in 14 patients. The 1- and 2-year local control rates were 93.8% and 87.5%, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated and none of the patients developed Grade 3 or higher late toxicity.ConclusionsThe combination of external beam radiotherapy with interstitial brachytherapy increases the dose to the tumor volume and limits the volume of irradiated normal tissue, thereby decreasing late toxicity. The use of image-based treatment planning provides better dose conformality with reduced toxicity and helps to prevent a geographic miss.     

Interfractional fluctuation of rectal dose in high dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer

Purpose The aim of the study was to explore the cause of the difference in the maximal rectal dose between the first and second high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy applications by comparing the thickness of the anterior rectal wall. Materials and methods The rectal dose and the thickness of the anterior rectal wall were analyzed in 26 patients with prostate cancer. After undergoing external beam radiation treatment with a total isocenter dose of 50 Gy, they were treated with HDR brachytherapy of 7.5 Gy/fraction, two fractions daily. The interval between the first HDR brachytherapy session and the second was 5 h. The rectal doses were directly surveyed during irradiation of the HDR brachytherapy. Thickening of the anterior rectal wall was measured at the same level by axial computed tomography scans obtained before the first and second HDR brachytherapy applications. Results The maximal surveyed rectal doses during the first and second HDR brachytherapy applications were 188 ± 51 cGy and 220 ± 35 cGy, respectively (P < 0.01). The fluctuation ratio exceeded 1 in each case. The thickness of the anterior rectal wall before the first and second HDR brachytherapy applications was 18.78 ± 4.34 mm and 14.95 ± 4.09 mm (P < 0.01), respectively. The fluctuation difference exceeded 0 in each case. Conclusion The different rectal dose is attributable to thinning of the anterior rectal wall. The total rectal dose is within the range of doses at risk of exerting a toxic effect on the rectum.     

High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy as monotherapy in one fraction of 20.5 Gy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: Toxicity and 6-year biochemical results

PurposeTo evaluate acute and late genitourinary toxicity, the gastrointestinal toxicity, and the long-term biochemical control after high-dose-rate (HDR) monotherapy in one fraction (20.5 Gy).Materials and MethodsBetween May 2011 and October 2014, 60 consecutive patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated; the median followup was 51 months (range 30–79). All patients received one implant and one fraction of 20.5 Gy HDR real-time U/S planned with transperineal hyaluronic acid injection into the perirectal. Toxicity was reported according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Event, Version 4.0 (CTAE v4.03) by the National Cancer Institute. Biochemical failure was defined according to the “Phoenix definition”.ResultsOur experience in a single fraction of 20.5 Gy HDR brachytherapy is well-tolerated. No intraoperative or perioperative complications occurred. Grade 1 acute genitourinary toxicity occurred in 36% of patients, Grade 2 or more was not observed, only 1 patient requiring the use of a catheter for 7 days in the immediate postoperative period. No gastrointestinal toxicity was observed. No chronic toxicity has been observed after treatment. Morbidity is practically the same as that obtained with 19 Gy in our previously published article but the actuarial biochemical control was better, 82% (±3%) at 6 years.ConclusionsA single dose of 20.5 Gy resulted in a low genitourinary morbidity and no gastrointestinal toxicity and achieves good levels of biochemical disease control.     

Upfront radiotherapy with brachytherapy for medically inoperable and unresectable patients with high-risk endometrial cancer

ObjectivesComprehensive surgery with adjuvant therapy is standard of care for high-risk endometrial cancers, whereas upfront radiotherapy with brachytherapy is indicated for inoperable/unresectable patients, irrespective of risk. We evaluated outcomes for inoperable/unresectable patients with high-risk endometrial cancer (HREC: stage III and/or grade 3) and low-risk endometrial cancer (LREC: stage I/II and grade 1/2) treated with upfront radiotherapy.MethodsTwenty-nine patients with inoperable/unresectable endometrial cancer were treated with upfront radiotherapy at an academic medical center from 2012 to 2019. Cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and recurrence rates between patients with HREC and LREC were compared.ResultsMedian follow-up was 17.0 months (range 3.7–54.0). Twenty cancers were stage I + II and nine were stage III. Twenty-one cancers were grade 1 + 2 and eight were grade 3. Thirteen patients (45%) had HREC. Twenty-five patients received radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy for primary treatment, while 4 patients received chemoradiotherapy before surgery. All patients underwent high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR) with 7 receiving HDR alone and 22 receiving external beam radiation and HDR. Two-year CSS was 100% for both HREC and LREC patients (log-rank p = 0.32). There was no OS difference between HREC and LREC patients (2-year: 73% vs. 77%; log-rank p = 0.33). Four HREC and 1 LREC patients recurred with one local recurrence in each group. There were no acute grade ≥3 and two late grade ≥3 gastrointestinal/genitourinary toxicities.ConclusionsUpfront radiotherapy for inoperable/unresectable HREC patients was well tolerated with high local control and CSS rates. Upfront radiotherapy with brachytherapy remains important even for high-risk inoperable and unresectable endometrial cancer patients.     

Re-irradiation with interstitial pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy for unresectable recurrent head and neck carcinoma

PurposeTo assess the long-term results of protocol-based interstitial pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy combined with simultaneous chemotherapy in selected patients with recurrent head and neck tumors not amenable to salvage surgery.Methods and MaterialsA total of 51 patients with recurrent head and neck cancer were treated with interstitial PDR brachytherapy. Forty patients (78%) had salvage brachytherapy alone using a median total dose of 60 Gy. Salvage brachytherapy in combination with external beam therapy was performed in 11 patients (22%) using a median total dose of D_REF = 27 Gy. Simultaneously with the PDR brachytherapy, a concomitant chemotherapy was administered in 35/51 (69%) of patients. The analysis was performed after a median followup of 58 months.ResultsLocal control rates calculated according to Kaplan–Meier after 2 and 5 years were 71% and 57%, respectively. Comparing results of salvage PDR brachytherapy with or without simultaneous chemotherapy, the 5-year local recurrence-free survival rates were 78.9% vs. 38.5% (p = 0.01), respectively. No other patient or treatment-related parameters had a significant influence on treatment results. A total of 9/51 (17.7%) and 6/51 (11.8%) patients developed soft-tissue necrosis or bone necrosis, respectively, but only 2% of patients required surgical treatment.ConclusionsPDR interstitial brachytherapy with pulse doses between 0.4 and 0.7 Gy/h/24 h with simultaneous chemotherapy is an effective and safe option for curative therapy in selected patients with head and neck cancer in previously irradiated areas, which are not suitable for salvage surgery.     

Improved rectal dosimetry with the use of SpaceOAR during high-dose-rate brachytherapy

PurposeHydrogel spacers have been suggested to limit rectal radiation dose with improvements in clinical outcomes in patients undergoing external beam radiation treatment for prostate cancer. No studies to date have assessed the utility and dosimetric effect of SpaceOAR (Augmenix, Inc, Waltham, MA), the only Food and Drug Administration–approved hydrogel rectal spacer, for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy.MethodsEighteen consecutive patients scheduled for HDR brachytherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer underwent transperineal ultrasound-guided placement of 10 cc of SpaceOAR hydrogel following catheter implantation. Treatment plans were generated using an inverse planning simulated annealing algorithm. Rectal dosimetry for these 18 patients was compared with the 36 preceding patients treated with HDR brachytherapy without SpaceOAR.ResultsFifty-four plans were analyzed. There was no difference in age, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen, Gleason score, clinical stage, prostate volume, or contoured rectal volume between those who received SpaceOAR and those who did not. Patients who received SpaceOAR hydrogel had significantly lower dose to the rectum as measured by percent of contoured organ at risk (median, V₈₀ < 0.005% vs. 0.010%, p = 0.003; V₇₅ < 0.005% vs. 0.14%, p < 0.0005; V₇₀ 0.09% vs. 0.88%, p < 0.0005; V₆₀ = 1.16% vs. 3.08%, p < 0.0005); similar results were seen for rectal volume in cubic centimeters. One patient who received SpaceOAR developed a perineal abscess 1 month after treatment.ConclusionsTransperineal insertion of SpaceOAR hydrogel at the time of HDR brachytherapy is feasible and decreases rectal radiation dose. Further investigation is needed to assess the clinical impact of this dosimetric improvement and potential toxicity reduction.     

Endoluminal high-dose-rate brachytherapy for locally recurrent or persistent esophageal cancer

PurposeManagement of locally recurrent or persistent esophageal cancer (EC) after standard chemoradiation is challenging. This study updates our experience of treating medically inoperable EC patients with endoluminal high-dose-rate brachytherapy (EHDRBT) including the patients treated with a novel multiballoon channel centering esophageal applicator.Methods and MaterialsThirty-three consecutive patients with early-stage primary (n = 7), posttreatment persistent (n = 7), and recurrent (n = 19) EC treated with EHDRBT at our institution were included. Median dose and treatment lengths were 14 Gy (range 10–17.5 Gy) and 6 cm (3.5–9.0 cm), respectively. Endoscopy and biopsy were performed 3 months after EHDRBT and then every 3–6 months thereafter.ResultsMedian followup was 17.4 months (range 5.0–88.3). Grade 1 and 2 toxicities were observed in 13 (44.8%) and 11 (37.9%) patients, respectively. Grade 3 toxicity (tracheoesophageal fistula) was observed in 1 patient who had previously received two courses of external beam radiotherapy as well as a stent insertion. Median overall survival (OS) for entire cohort was 20.9 months, and 1-year OS was 78%. Complete response was achieved in 58.6% of patients with median time to failure and 1-year disease-free survival of 10.3 months (range 5.4–28.2) and 27%, respectively.ConclusionsFor medically inoperable patients with early-stage primary or local posttreatment residual or recurrent EC, EHDRBT is a well-tolerated treatment option with minimal Grade ≥3 toxicity. Brachytherapy in our hands continues to be a safe treatment option. Although 58.6% of patients achieved a complete response and the OS of this cohort is relatively good, long-term local control and cure remains a challenge.     

Evolution of brachytherapy treatment planning to deterministic radiation transport for calculation of cardiac dose

Brachytherapy was among the first methods of radiotherapy and has steadily continued to evolve. Here we present a brief review of the progression of dose calculation methods in brachytherapy to the current state-of-the art computerized methods for heterogeneity correction. We further review the origin and development of the BrachyVision (Varian Medical Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA) treatment planning system and evaluate dosimetric results from 12 patients implanted with the strut-assisted volumetric implant (SAVI) applicator (Cianna Medical, Aliso Viejo, CA) for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). Dosimetric results from plans calculated using homogenous and heterogeneous algorithms have been compared to investigate the impact of heterogeneity corrections. Our study showed large percent difference between mean cardiac doses 11.8?±?6.2% (p?=?0.0007) calculated with and without heterogeneity corrections. Our findings are consistent with those of others, indicating an overestimation of the distal dose to organs-at-risk by traditional methods, especially at interfaces between air and tissue.     

Comparison of PSA relapse-free survival in patients treated with ultra-high-dose IMRT versus combination HDR brachytherapy and IMRT

PurposeWe report on a retrospective comparison of biochemical outcomes using an ultra-high dose of conventionally fractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) vs. a lower dose of IMRT combined with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy to increase the biologically effective dose of IMRT.MethodsPatients received IMRT of 86.4 Gy (n = 470) or HDR brachytherapy (21 Gy in three fractions) followed by IMRT of 50.4 Gy (n = 160). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse was defined as PSA nadir + 2. Median followup was 53 months for IMRT alone and 47 months for HDR.ResultsThe 5-year actuarial PSA relapse-free survival (PRFS) for HDR plus IMRT vs. ultra-high-dose IMRT were 100% vs. 98%, 98% vs. 84%, and 93% vs. 71%, for National Comprehensive Cancer Network low- (p = 0.71), intermediate- (p < 0.001), and high-risk (p = 0.23) groups, respectively. Treatment (p = 0.0006), T stage (p < 0.0001), Gleason score (p < 0.0001), pretreatment PSA (p = 0.0037), risk group (p < 0.0001), and lack of androgen-deprivation therapy (p = 0.0005) were significantly associated with improved PRFS on univariate analysis. HDR plus IMRT vs. ultra-high-dose IMRT (p = 0.0012, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.184); age (p = 0.0222, HR = 0.965); and risk group (p < 0.0001, HR = 2.683) were associated with improved PRFS on multivariate analysis.ConclusionDose escalation of IMRT by adding HDR brachytherapy provided improved PRFS in the treatment of prostate cancer compared with ultra-high-dose IMRT, independent of risk group on multivariate analysis, with the most significant benefit for intermediate-risk patients.     

From low-dose-rate to high-dose-rate brachytherapy in lip carcinoma: Equivalent results but fewer complications

PurposeTo compare the use of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) in patients with lip carcinoma with a former series previously treated with low-dose-rate (LDR) BT.Methods and MaterialsNinety-nine patients treated with LDR-BT were compared with 104 patients treated with HDR-BT. Distribution by stage was 53.5% T1, 15.1% T2, 3.1% T3, and 28.3% T4 for LDR and 52.9% T1, 32.7% T2, 0% T3, and 14.4% T4 for HDR. Some cases with positive or close margins received BT after surgery (34.3% with LDR vs. 16.3% with HDR). Parallel metallic needles were used in 100% of HDR cases and in 76% of LDR cases. Most HDR patients were treated with HDR-BT to a dose of 4.5–5 Gy per fraction prescribed to a 90% isodose, in nine fractions delivered twice daily for 5 days.ResultsMedian followup was 63 months for LDR-BT and 51 months for HDR-BT. Overall local control for LDR- vs. HDR-BT was 94.9% vs. 95.2%; and 100% vs. 100%, 86.6% vs. 94.1%, and 89.3% vs. 80%, for T1, T2, and T4 stage tumors, respectively. Disease-free survival for LDR vs. HDR was 95.9% vs. 94.2%. Soft tissue necrosis, bone necrosis, and fair-bad cosmesis for LDR vs. HDR was 15.1% vs. 0%, 1% vs. 0%, and 11.1% vs. 0%, respectively.ConclusionsTreatment with HDR-BT using rigid needles is a simple technique that provides good long-term results with minimal complications. LDR- and HDR-BT are regarded as equally effective in local control and disease-free survival, but fewer complications arise when using HDR-BT.     

Perioperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy in locally advanced and recurrent gynecological cancer: Final results of a Phase II trial

PurposeTo determine the long-term results of a Phase II trial of perioperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy (PHDRB) in primary advanced or recurrent gynecological cancer.Methods and MaterialsFifty patients with locally advanced and recurrent gynecological cancer suitable for salvage surgery were included. Unirradiated patients (n = 25) received preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery and PHDRB (16–24 Gy). Previously irradiated patients (n = 25) received surgery and PHDRB alone (32–40 Gy).ResultsMedian followup was 11.5 years. Eight unirradiated patients (32%) developed Grade ≥3 toxic events including two fatal events. Local and locoregional control rates at 16 years were 87.3% and 78.9%, respectively. Sixteen-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 42.9% and 46.4%, respectively. Ten previously irradiated patients (40.0%) developed Grade ≥3 adverse events, including four fatal events. Local and locoregional control rates at 14 years were 59.6% and 42.6%, respectively. Fourteen-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 16.0% and 19.2%, respectively.ConclusionsPHDRB allows effective salvage of a subset of unfavorable gynecological tumors with high-risk surgical margins. Toxicity was unacceptable at the initial dose levels but deescalation resulted in the absence of severe toxicity without a negative impact on locoregional control. A substantial percentage of patients remain alive and controlled at >10 years including a few previously irradiated cases with positive margins.     

The experiences of women receiving brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A systematic literature review

ObjectivesTo determine women's experiences of brachytherapy for cervical cancer.Key findingsNineteen studies were included for data extraction/synthesis. Twelve studies focussed on psychological issues, seven on pharmacological aspects of women's experiences. Themes of anxiety, distress, pain, informational needs and non-pharmacological interventions were found. Nine out of ten psychological studies described brachytherapy as a distressing experience causing anxiety and distress for most women. Non-pharmacological interventions were found to be effective and inexpensive adjuncts. Peri and post-operative pharmacological management was variable, but duration of procedure was an important factor.ConclusionBrachytherapy for gynaecological cancer causes varying levels of pain, anxiety and distress. To improve women's experiences there needs to be better pain management, patient information and the development of non-pharmacological interventions. Future recommendations are to develop clinical support guidelines, audit the quality of services and develop effective interventions to improve women's experiences of brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.     

Patient-reported outcomes of prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost comparing an outpatient and inpatient protocol: a two-center chronologic cohort study

Purpose

To determine patients’ self-reported experiences of outpatient high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy boost, and compare with previous cohort treated as inpatients.

Methods and Materials

Using the Prostate Brachytherapy Questionnaire, we previously examined patients’ subjective experience of the brachytherapy procedure when it involved one implant and hospitalization with the template in situ for 2 days (Group 1). The protocol was subsequently changed to two implants, 2 weeks apart as outpatients. Fifty-eight patients treated with the new protocol (Group 2) completed the same questionnaire. We compared the self-reported experiences between Groups 1 and 2 and also between the first and second implant for those in Group 2. Our hypothesis was that the worst rated issues in Group 1 might be reduced with the new approach.

Results

Group 2 patients were less troubled overall by the procedure (mean scores 2.3 vs. 3.2, p = 0.0293). Specifically, they were less troubled by “discomfort” (2.8 vs. 3.8, p = 0.0254); “being stuck in bed” (1.7 vs. 4.2 p < 0.0001); “feeling helpless” (1.3 vs. 2.8, p = 0.0009); “fear of opening my bowels” (2.1 vs. 3.3, p = 0.0055); and “fear of coping with the implant” (1.3 vs. 2.5, p = 0.0004). There was no significant increase in “thought of implant” or “fear of implant” before the second implant. However, more patients rated worse than expected “fear of passing urine” during the second implant.

Conclusions

Patients rated high-dose-rate brachytherapy less troublesome when delivered as outpatient with two implants, 2 weeks apart than as inpatient over 3 days, despite the additional invasive procedure and anesthesia.     

局部晚期宫颈癌腔内放疗联合组织间插植的剂量学研究

目的 比较局部晚期宫颈癌单纯腔内放疗与腔内联合组织间插植放疗的剂量学差异。方法 2016年5月—2017年3月局部晚期宫颈癌患者共35例,均行根治性放疗,治疗方法为外照射+腔内联合组织间插植放疗。调强放射治疗处方剂量为46.8~50.4 Gy/26~28次,1.8 Gy/次。腔内联合组织间插植放疗剂量为7 Gy/次,1次/周,共4次。同一患者首先置入三管式后装放疗施源器,采集CT图像制定治疗计划,取出三管式施源器后,置入宫腔管并植入插植针,再次采集图像制定放疗计划。分别评价比较两组计划中靶区及危及器官的受照剂量差别。结果 共制定212次后装放疗计划,其中单纯腔内治疗计划106例,腔内联合组织间插植治疗计划106例。腔内联合组织间插植放疗组计划较单纯腔内放疗组的靶区剂量明显升高,高危临床靶区（CTV）的D₉₀、中危CTV的D₉₀均显著增高（t=-6.01、-2.73,P<0.05）,膀胱、直肠、乙状结肠的D_{2 cm³}显著降低（t=3.07、4.52、2.91,P<0.05）。结论 局部晚期宫颈癌应用腔内联合插植放疗可以明显提高靶区剂量,并降低危及器官膀胱、直肠和乙状结肠的受照剂量。     

Comparative analysis of rectal dose parameters in image-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer with and without a rectal retractor

PurposeThe objective of this study was to determine if use of a rectal retractor (RR) in high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer reduces rectal dose parameters.Methods and MaterialsWe reviewed data obtained from patients treated with intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer with and without an RR. Treatment plans for each brachytherapy fraction were separated into two groups; R group with use of an RR and P group with use of vaginal packing. Dose–volume parameters for high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), rectum, sigmoid, small bowel, and vaginal surface were collected for each fraction. Rectal D_2cc and International Commission on Radiation Units & Measurements (ICRU) rectal point doses were compared between groups using Student's t tests. Predictors of higher rectal D_2cc were determined by univariate and multivariate regression analyses.ResultsFour hundred sixty-three brachytherapy fractions from 114 patients were used for analysis, 377 fractions with a RR (R group) and 86 with vaginal packing only (P group). Both groups were similar except for slightly higher mean HR-CTV and mean bladder volume in P group. Both mean ICRU rectal point dose (241.1 vs. 269.9 cGy, p = 0.006) and rectal D_2cc (240.6 vs. 283.6 cGy, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in P group. Point A dose, HR-CTV, stage, and use of an RR were significant predictors of rectal D_2cc on multivariate analysis.ConclusionsOur data show that use of an RR leads to lower rectal dose parameters compared with vaginal packing. Further study is needed to determine if this will lead to less long-term toxicity.     

Characterizing the impact of adaptive planning on image-guided perineal interstitial brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies

PurposeTo determine the dosimetric impact of organ and implant motion/deformation in the context of adaptive planning in image-guided gynecologic brachytherapy using a 3-fraction transperineal approach.Methods and materialsTwenty-six patients were analyzed. Each patient was treated with three fractions given over a 24-h period using a single insertion. A planning CT scan (±MRI) was acquired before the first fraction. A verification scan was taken within 1 h following the second fraction. A single plan was delivered for Fractions 1 and 2 with an adaptive plan delivered for Fraction 3. Two evaluation frameworks were established. Framework 1 investigated the effects of motion/deformation from both implant and organs. Framework 2 investigated the impact of implant motion/deformation alone. Differences in high-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV) D_90%, V_100%, and bladder/rectum D_2cc were assessed.ResultsFrom implant to verification, the HRCTV D_90% and V_100% decreased significantly (5.0%, p < 0.01; 3.1%, p < 0.01) and rectal D_2cc was significantly higher (12.2%, p = 0.02). Adaptive planning recouped these changes. Implant changes resulted in a reduction in HRCTV dose and coverage, but no significant effect was seen in the bladder or rectum.ConclusionsAdaptive planning represents an important aspect of perineal-based interstitial image-guided brachytherapy given in three fractions; its absence would result in plan degradation.     

Inverse planning simulated annealing for magnetic resonance imaging-based intracavitary high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer

PURPOSE: To develop a technique using exclusively magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to perform dwell position identification, targets and organs at risk delineation, and to apply inverse planning dose optimization to high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We included 15 consecutive women treated with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for cervical cancer. All patients underwent MRI after placement of tandem and ring applicator containing a gadodiamide-filled dummy marker. This technique allowed direct visualization of the source pathway and precise definition of the intra-applicator source positions. For each patient, we delineated gross target volume (GTV), high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), and organs at risk on MRI, according to the European Gynecological GEC-ESTRO Working Group definitions. We performed inverse planning simulated annealing (IPSA) and analyzed the dose-volume histograms with the following endpoints: D(90), D(100), and V(100) for GTV and HR-CTV; D0.1 cc, D1 cc, D2 cc for bladder, rectum, and bowel; and dose at Point A. RESULTS: The intra-applicator source pathway was easily visualized on MRI using the gadodiamide-filled marker. IPSA provided excellent target coverage. The mean D(90) and V(100) for HR-CTV were 103+/-5% and 92+/-3%, respectively. IPSA provided excellent bladder sparing. D1 cc and D2 cc of bladder were 73+/-10% and 67+/-10%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a novel technique that allows direct visualization of the intra-applicator source pathway on MRI. Using this technique, we successfully performed inverse planning directly from MRI.