Surgery for local pelvic recurrence after resection of rectal cancer

This retrospective study evaluated outcome with regard to procedure, local control, and survival after curative surgical resection with and without preoperative radiotherapy for local pelvic recurrence. A total of 58 consecutive patients with local pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer after previous curative resection for primary tumors were reviewed. Of these, 36 underwent both initial resection and follow-up in our department; the remaining 22 had initial surgery and follow-up elsewhere. Of the 58 patients 27 underwent curative re-resection, 9 had palliative resection, and 22 were treated by conservative therapy. Among the 27 patients with curative resection 17 received preoperative radiotherapy (40 Gy) plus surgery and 10 surgery only. No patients were lost to follow-up; median follow-up time was 36.3 months. The overall rate of curative resection was 46.6%: 55.6% in our own follow-up group and 31.8% in the others. With regard to surgical procedure, abdominoperineal resection (APR) with or without sacral resection was standard following previous low anterior resection, and total pelvic exenteration (TPE) with or without sacral resection was common following APR. There was a high incidence of morbidity (71.4%) after TPE. Re-recurrence was observed in 12 (44.4%) after curative re-resection. There was local re-recurrence in 6 (22.2%). The local re-recurrence rate was 11.8% (n = 2) with radiotherapy plus surgery, and 40.0% (n = 4) with surgery alone. The estimated 5-year survival following curative re-resection was 45.6% (61.2% with radiotherapy plus surgery, 29.6% with surgery alone). Both survival and local control with radiotherapy plus surgery tended to be better than with surgery alone. Thus, in selected patients pelvic local recurrence of rectal cancer can be re-resected curably by APR or TPE (with or without sacral resection) combined with preoperative radiotherapy. Accepted: 10 October 1997     

Local tumor recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer

Local tumor recurrence rates after curative rectal cancer surgery with the end-to-end anastomosis stapler (EEA^®) are reportedly high. Therefore, a retrospective review in ten Yale-affiliated hospitals was undertaken to establish the outcome of surgical resection for rectal cancer in this patient population. Of those 373 patients who had had curative resections, 192 (52 percent) were abdominoperineal resections (APR); 105 patients (28 percent) had restorative resections with sutured anastomoses, and the EEA stapler was used in 76 patients (20 percent). There was an equal distribution of tumors in the various Dukes' stages in all three procedures. Local tumor recurrence was: APR 19 percent, SUT 17 percent, and EEA 24 percent, but local tumor recurrence was more frequent after EEA than APR for tumors 7 to 10 cm from the anal verge (32 vs. 13 percent, respectively,P<0.05), and the time to recurrence was least in EEA patients. It is concluded that local tumor recurrence is higher than expected for all three procedures and that the EEA stapler was associated with a greater risk of local tumor recurrence. These findings are attributed to surgeon-related technical operative factors rather than to the nature of the tumors themselves.     

Complication after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum

Treatment of rectal cancer commonly involves pre-operative short-term external beam radiotherapy along with curative surgery. We describe a case that was treated with the standard multi-modality treatment but developed some very unusual complications.     

Risk factors for developing voiding dysfunction after abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma of the rectum

Voiding dysfunction is a common sequel of abdominoperineal resection of the rectum. Twenty patients symptomatic after abdominoperineal resection, 14 with a preoperative normal urodynamic study and six with evidence of obstruction, were studied postoperatively. The importance of the following factors is analyzed: sex, stage, grade, size, distance of the tumor from the anal verge, metastatic lymph-node involvement, and extent of lymphadenectomy. Male gender, tumors situated between 4 and 8 cm from the anal verge, and lymphadenectomy that includes more than ten nodes may be considered risk factors for neurologic damage and postoperative voiding dysfunction.     

Results of salvage abdominoperineal resection for anal cancer after radiotherapy

PURPOSE: Nonsurgical treatment of anal cancer by radiotherapy alone or combined with chemotherapy is the standard therapy for epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal. Surgery is only recommended for treatment failures. Very few studies have been devoted to the outcome of this salvage surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate these results. METHODS: A retrospective review from 1986 to 1995 revealed 21 patients with residual or recurrent anal canal carcinoma after initial radiotherapy, operated on by abdominoperineal resection. Patients were reviewed as to age, gender, initial treatment, any symptoms of recurrence, duration until recurrence, any diagnosis imaging, treatment, and outcome. RESULTS: None of these 21 patients had known lymph node involvement or metastases at radiotherapy or at salvage abdominoperineal resection. Eleven patients had residual disease (positive biopsy less than 6 months after the end of radiotherapy) and 10 had tumor recurrence (more than 6 months after cessation of treatment). Recurrence occurred at a mean of 15 (range, 9–41) months after radiotherapy. All 21 patients underwent an abdominoperineal resection. Pathologic examination of the 21 specimens showed complete excision in all cases except one and lymph node metastases in two cases. There was no perioperative mortality. The mean follow-up after surgery was 40 months; no patients were lost to follow-up. Of the 21 patients, 10 died and 11 lived, of whom 9 are disease free. The overall survival rate at three years after salvage abdominoperineal resection was 58 percent. The overall survival rate for patients with residual disease (vs. recurrence) at three years was 72 percent (vs. 29 percent) and at five years was 60 percent (vs. 0 percent;P=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Salvage abdominoperineal resection for anal cancer can be expected to yield a number of survivors from residual disease, but the low rate of survival after abdominoperineal resection for recurrent disease suggests the need for additional postoperative treatment if salvage abdominoperineal resection is performed.     

Male sexual function after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer

In a series of 26 male patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection of the rectum for malignant disease, a detailed history of sexual function was obtained, using a questionnaire before and 12 months after the operation. The overall incidence of sexual dysfunction was 61.5 per cent, total and partial erectile impotence being, respectively, both 27 per cent. Taking age into account, among men of the youngest age group (41–48 yrs), incidence of complete and partial erectile impotence was 14 per cent. In the middle age group (49–57 yrs), 22 per cent reported total and 33 per cent reported partial erectile impotence, whereas in patients of the oldest group (58–65 yrs), total erectile impotence was present in 40 per cent and partial in an additional 30 per cent. The extent of the disease (Dukes' stage) was found to be of no value as a prognostic index of postoperative sexual dysfunction. It is concluded that the age of the patients is the most important factor related to sexual activity after abdominoperineal resection for cancer.     

Factors affecting local recurrence of colonic adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE: The aim of this retrospective study was to determine which aspects of tumor morphology and histology influenced the incidence of local recurrence after curative resection of colonic adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Patients who had a curative resection for a primary colonic adenocarcinoma between 1980 and 1993 (inclusive) were identified from the colorectal cancer database in the Department of Colorectal Surgery. The charts of patients diagnosed with a local recurrence were then reviewed and their findings at operation and histologic assessment analyzed. Patients were followed up for at least five years or until death. RESULTS: Over the period of study, 1,031 patients had a curative resection for colonic adenocarcinoma. Local recurrences were detected in 32 patients (3.1 percent). The gender distribution of patients with local recurrence was 18 males (56.3 percent) and 14 females (43.7 percent) with a mean age of 63.4 years. The median time to local recurrence was 13 (range, 2–71) months. The distribution of primary tumors that recurred locally favored the cecum (n = 9; 28.1 percent) and sigmoid colon (n = 14; 43.7 percent) over other locations; these were, however, the most common sites of primary lesions. Less common sites included the ascending colon (n = 0; 0 percent), hepatic flexure (n = 2; 6.3 percent), transverse colon (n = 1; 3.1 percent), splenic flexure (n = 3; 9.4 percent), and descending colon (n = 3; 9.4 percent). Of the total number of tumors, 101 were found to be adherent to at least 1 other intra-abdominal viscus, and 12 (11.9 percent) recurred locally. Other factors associated with local recurrence were tumor perforation and fistulation. Overall, 30 tumors (2.9 percent) were perforated, and 6 (20 percent) recurred locally. Four tumors (0.4 percent) were fistulating; of these, 2 (50 percent) recurred locally. Advanced tumor stage was also associated with an increased rate of local recurrence (Stage I, 0 percent; Stage II, 2.05 percent; Stage III, 7.0 percent; and Stage IV, 6.1 percent). Similarly, tumor differentiation was related to local recurrence, with no instances in well-differentiated tumors, 2.8 percent in moderately differentiated tumors, and 6.8 percent in poorly differentiated tumors. CONCLUSIONS: The location of the primary tumor is not a factor in producing local recurrence. Fixity to another viscus, perforation or fistulation, advanced stage of disease, and differentiation of tumor appear to increase the chances of recurrence of curatively resected colonic carcinoma. Although the recurrence rate is higher in these groups than for tumors overall, definitive oncologic surgery prevents recurrence in the majority of cases. No colonic tumor that was T1 or T2 (N0, N1, or N2) or that was well differentiated recurred locally.     

Mortality,morbidity, and patterns of recurrence after abdominoperineal resection for cancer of the rectum

Records of 230 patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection between 1963 and 1976 were reviewed. The median age of the patients was 62 years. The mortality rate was 1.7 per cent, and the morbidity rate was 61 per cent. One hundred eighty patients were followed for five to 13 years to identify patterns of recurence. Ten-year survival for Dukes' A, B, and C lesions was 83 per cent, 57 per cent, and 31 per cent, respectively. Seventy-eight patients (43 per cent) had recurrent cancer; 10 per cent had local lesions, and 33 per cent had distant lesions. Dukes' B lesions had a greater latency for local recurrence than Dukes' C lesions. Dukes' A lesions with distant recurrence had a greater latency than Dukes' B or C lesions. Once recurrence was established, the survival rate was not significantly different, regardless of Dukes' stage or local or distant site. Radiation therapy for established local recurrence or chemotherapy for established distant recurrence did not seem to alter survival rates. Read at the meeting of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Colorado Springs, Colorado, June 7 to 11, 1981. Aided by a grant from the American Cancer Society, Massachusetts Division, Inc.     

Laparoscopicvs. open abdominoperineal resection for cancer

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection and open abdominoperineal resection for cancer. METHODS: Records of 194 patients who underwent laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (42 patients) or open abdominoperineal resection (152 patients) at three institutions between 1991 and 1997 were reviewed. Follow-up was through office charts, American College of Surgeons cancer registry, or telephone contact. Tumors included (laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection and open abdominoperineal resection, respectively) adenocarcinoma (86 and 92 percent), squamous (12 and 7 percent), and gastrointestinal stromal (2 and 1.4 percent) types; Stages I (17 and 26 percent), II (24 and 33 percent), III (43 and 32 percent), and IV (14 and 9 percent); and those with invasion of pelvic structures (14 and 16 percent). RESULTS: Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection was converted to open abdominoperineal resection in 21 percent because of vessel injury (33 percent), poor exposure (22 percent), adhesions (22 percent), inguinal hernia (11 percent), or radiation fibrosis (11 percent). Perineal infections occurred more often in the laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection group (24vs. 8 percent;P=0.02). Late stoma complications were similar. Mean hospital stay was shorter after laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (7vs. 12 days). Radial margins were positive in 12 percent of laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection and 12.5 percent of open abdominoperineal resection specimens. Tumor recurrence was similar for both local (19 and 14 percent) and distant (38 and 26 percent) recurrence. Survival rates were similar by Kaplan-Meier curves, with median follow-up of 19 and 24 months, respectively (P=0.22; log rank). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection can be performed safely and results in a shorter hospital stay. A randomized, prospective trial is needed to determine the long-term outcome of cancer treatment.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, San Antonio, Texas, May 2 to 7, 1998.     

Risk factors for local recurrence of middle and lower rectal carcinoma after curative resection

AIM： To explore the risk factors for local recurrence of middle and lower rectal carcinoma after curative resection. METHODS： Specimens of middle and lower rectal carcinoma from 56 patients who received curative resection at the Department of General Surgery of Guangdong Provincial People＇s Hospital were studied. A large slice technique was used to detect mesorectal metastasis and evaluate circumferential resection margin status. The relations between clinicopathologic characteristics, mesorectal metastasis and circumferential resection margin status were identified in patients with local recurrence of middle and lower rectal carcinoma. RESULTS： Local recurrence of middle and lower rectal carcinoma after curative resection occurred in 7 of the 56 patients （12.5%）, and was significantly associated with family history （Х^2= 3.929, P = 0.047）, high CEA level （Х^2 = 4.964, P = 0.026）, cancerous perforation （Х^2 = 8.503, P = 0.004）, tumor differentiation （Х^2 = 9.315, P = 0.009） and vessel cancerous emboli （Х^2 = 11.879, P = 0.001）. In contrast, no significant correlation was found between local recurrence of rectal carcinoma and other variables such as age （Х^2 = 0.506, P = 0.477）, gender （Х^2 = 0.102, Z2 = 0.749）, tumor diameter （Х^2 = 0.421, P = 0.516）,tumor infiltration （Х^2 = 5.052, P = 0.168）, depth of tumor invasion （Х^2 = 4.588, P = 0.101）, lymph node metastases （Х^2 = 3.688, P = 0.055） and TNM staging system （Х^2 = 3.765, P = 0.152）. The local recurrence rate of middle and lower rectal carcinoma was 33.3% （4/12） in patients with positive circumferential resection margin and 6.8% （3/44） in those with negative circumferential resection margin. There was a significant difference between the two groups （Х^2 = 6.061, P = 0.014）. Local recurrence of rectal carcinoma occurred in 6 of 36 patients （16.7%） with mesorectal metastasis, and in 1 of 20 patients （5.0%） without mesorectal metastasis. However, there was no significant     

Anal sphincter reconstruction by dynamic graciloplasty after abdominoperineal resection for cancer

PURPOSE: Chronic low-frequency electrical stimulation can safely transform fatiguing muscle into fatigue-resistant muscle. This fundamental discovery was used to reconstruct the anal sphincter. Dynamic graciloplasty was found to be effective in the treatment of fecal incontinence. Our study was undertaken to investigate the oncologic, functional, and quality of life results of dynamic graciloplasty anal reconstruction after an abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma. METHODS: Between April 1993 and April 1996, nine patients (4 males) with a median age of 51.2 (range, 29–69) years underwent an abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma (4 had a rectal adenocarcinoma and 5 had an epidermoidal anal tumor) and an anal sphincter reconstruction with electrically stimulated graciloplasty. Oncologic and functional results were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 32 (range, 14–59) months. A quality of life questionnaire was filled out by seven patients. RESULTS: Sphincter reconstruction required the same hospitalization period as abdominoperineal resection. Two patients died from evolutive disease. Three patients were operated on twice, one for immediate colonic necrosis, two for colonic perforation after enema. One of them refused the graciloplasty and had an abdominoperineal resection. Six patients were dysfunctioned. The mean resting pressure was 24±10 mmHg, and the mean pressure during stimulation was 95±25 mmHg. Five patients were continent for solids and liquid; four wore less than three pads per day, and one wore more than three. Four patients used enemas twice a week; one patient had spontaneous evacuation. The quality of life questionnaire showed that the mean scores for social interaction, symptoms, and psychological and physical states were 2.1, 2.2, 2.4, and 2.7, respectively. The mean value was 1.5 CONCLUSIONS: Total anorectal reconstruction with dynamic graciloplasty is an oncologically safe procedure. Functional results improve with time, but careful patient selection guarantees a successful functional outcome. Technical progress is necessary to improve the quality of life.Supported by a grant from the Ligue Contre le Cancer, Comité de l'Hérault et de l'Aveyron, and the Comité de Lutte contre le Cancer de Ginestas, France.Presented at the International Conference on Gastrointestinal Oncology, Washington, DC, September 12 to 14, 1997.     

Local recurrence after curative resection of cancer of the rectum without total mesorectal excision

PURPOSE: The aim of this article was to examine local recurrence after curative resection for carcinoma of the rectum in which the surgical technique of total mesorectal excision was not performed. METHODS: A single surgeon managed the patients and the data collected prospectively. Total excision of the distal mesorectum was not performed in the upper third or mid rectum. RESULTS: From 1969 to 1993 curative resections were performed in 549 patients, of which 17 died postoperatively, leaving 532 for analysis. Sphincter-saving resection was performed in 468 patients (88 percent) and abdominoperineal excision in 58 (10.9 percent). The pathology stages (Dukes) were A, 158 (29.7 percent); B, 184 (34.7 percent); and C, 190 (35.7 percent). Five hundred seventeen patients (97.2 percent) were followed up for a minimum of five years. The median period of follow-up was 82 months. Local recurrence confined to the pelvis occurred in 17 patients, and local recurrence associated with distant metastases occurred in 24 patients. The total five-year local recurrence rate was 7.6 percent. Local recurrence was increased in Stage C tumors (P=<0.0001). Diathermy dissection in the pelvis was associated with a decreased local recurrence rate (P=0.023). The five-year survival rate in curative resections was 72.5 percent. CONCLUSIONS: It is essential that articles presenting local recurrence rates should include both local recurrence in isolation and that which occurs with distant metastases. Although total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer was not performed in this study, the local recurrence rate is not materially different from that in several articles where total mesorectal excision has been used. Whether the distal mesorectum needs to be pursued in mid-rectal cancer is not yet proven.     

Risk factors for local recurrence and appropriate surveillance interval after endoscopic resection

BACKGROUND Risk factors for local recurrence after polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR), and endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) have not been identified.Additionally, the appropriate interval for endoscopic surveillance of colorectal tumors at high-risk of local recurrence has not been established.AIM To clarify the clinicopathological characteristics of recurrent lesions after endoscopic colorectal tumor resection and determine the appropriate interval.METHODS Three hundred and sixty patients(1412 colorectal tumors) who underwent polypectomy, EMR, or ESD and received endoscopic surveillance subsequently for more than one year to detect local recurrence were enrolled in this study. The clinicopathological factors associated with local recurrence were determined via univariate and multivariate analyses.RESULTS Local recurrence was observed in 31 of 360(8.6%) patients [31 of 1412(2.2%)lesions] after colorectal tumor resection. Piecemeal resection, tumor size of more than 2 cm, and the presence of villous components were associated with colorectal tumor recurrence after endoscopic resection. Of these three factors, the piecemeal resection procedure was identified as an independent risk factor for recurrence. Colorectal tumors resected into more than five pieces were associated with a high risk of recurrence since the average period from resection torecurrence in these cases was approximately 3 mo. The period to recurrence in cases resected into more than 5 pieces was much shorter than that in those resected into less than 4 pieces(3.8 ± 1.9 mo vs 7.9 ± 5.0 mo, P < 0.05).CONCLUSION Local recurrence of endoscopically treated colorectal tumors depends upon the outcome of first endoscopic procedure. Piecemeal resection was the only significant risk factor associated with local recurrence after endoscopic resection.     

Seminal vesicle fistula following abdominoperineal resection for recurrent adenocarcinoma of the rectum

PURPOSE: Fistula formation between the seminal vesicles and a pelvic abscess after abdominal perineal resection for recurrent rectal cancer is reported in a 32-year-old male previously treated with low anterior resection, chemotherapy, and radiation. METHODS: The case history was reviewed for clinical presentation, radiologic studies, and laboratory data. RESULTS: Successful management of this previously unreported complication included percutaneous abscess drainage, antimicrobial therapy, and oral administration of Proscar^® (Merck, Sharpe & Dohme, Rathway, NJ). CONCLUSION: Multiple factors predisposed this patient's development of a seminal vesicle fistula. These include extensive scarring from previous surgery, pelvic radiation, and an immunologically depressed status. The efficacy of Proscar^® in the successful management of this case remains unknown.     

Teflon® felt for closure of the pelvic floor after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum

Teflon^® felt has been used in ten patients without complication or delay in healing, as a satisfactory means of closing a large gap in the peritoneal floor after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. The technique is described.     

Meshless repair of perineal hernia after abdominoperineal resection: case report

Perineal hernia is a rare complication after major pelvic surgery. Placing non–biodegradable mesh across the pelvic inlet is the best method of repair. A 72–year–old man presented with a perineal hernia 8 years after undergoing an abdominoperineal resection because of rectal cancer. During the repair operation, intestinal spillage occurred, making it impossible to place permanent mesh as planned. Instead, we used the bladder to cover the pelvic inlet. The patient recovered well and after 35 months of follow–up, there was no evidence of hernia recurrence. When mesh placement is not feasible, this bladder mobilization technique can replace it.     

Local recurrence after curative anterior resection with principally blunt dissection for carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of local pelvic recurrence of carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid (tumors where the lower edge is 18 cm or less from the anal verge) in a consecutive series of patients operated on by a single surgeon. All patients underwent curative anterior resection and a formal anatomic dissection of the rectum where mobilization was achieved through a principally careful blunt manual technique along fascial planes, preserving an oncologic package. METHOD: During the period April 1986 to December 1997, 157 consecutive anterior resections for carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid were performed by one surgeon (ALP). One hundred thirty-eight (87.9 percent) were curative, and 19 (12.1 percent) were palliative. The mean follow-up period was 46±31.6 (range, 2–140) months. Data were retrospectively collated and computer coded by an independent contracted medical research team. Follow-up data were available on all patients. RESULTS: Four (3.1 percent) of the 131 patients undergoing curative anterior resection had local recurrence. Local recurrences occurred between 16 and 38 months from the time of resection, and the cumulative risk of developing local recurrence at five years was 5.2 percent. All tumors in which pelvic recurrence occurred were high grade, and the probability of developing local recurrence at five years for this group was 13.9 percent, which is significantly higher compared with patients who had average or low-grade tumors (P=0.01). The probability of developing local recurrence at five years for Stage I tumors was 0, Stage II was 5.9 percent, and Stage III was 8.9 percent. In addition, there was a significantly higher incidence of local recurrence in the group of patients undergoing ultralow anterior resection (between 3 and 6 cm from the anal verge) as compared with patients undergoing low or high anterior resection (P=0.03). Local recurrence developed in 3 of 28 (10.7 percent) patients having ultralow anterior resection, 1 of 57 (1.8 percent) patients having low anterior resection (between 6 and 10 cm from the anal verge), and no patients having high anterior resection (above 10 cm from the anal verge). The clinical anastomotic leak rate for curative anterior resection was 7 of 131 patients (5.3 percent). Thirty-seven of the 131 (28.2 percent) required a proximal defunctioning stoma; 35 (41.2 percent) of these were established for low or ultralow anterior resections and 2 for high anterior resection. The overall five-year cancer-specific survival rate of the entire group of 131 patients was 81.8 percent, and the overall probability of being disease free at five years including both local and distal recurrence was 72.9 percent. Three local recurrences occurred in the 101 patients (77 percent) who did not receive any form of adjuvant therapy. One local recurrence occurred in the 18 patients (13.7 percent) who had adjuvant chemoradiation. No recurrence occurred in the 12 patients (9.2 percent) who had adjuvant chemotherapy alone. CONCLUSION: Curative anterior resection for carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid with principally blunt dissection of the rectum in this study is associated with a 3.1 percent incidence and a 5.2 percent probability at five years of developing local recurrence. Evidence from this study indicates that, as with sharp pelvic dissection, a low incidence and probability of local recurrence can be achieved by a principally blunt mobilization technique through careful attention to preservation of fascial planes in the pelvis and removal of an oncologic package with selective rather than routine adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemoradiation.Supported by a research grant from the Cabrini Clinical Education and Research Foundation.Read at The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons' 100th Anniversary and Tripartite Meeting, Washington, D.C., May 1 to 6, 1999.     

The relationship between local recurrence and positive lateral margin after en bloc resection of colorectal neoplasm

Abstract

Background: The factors associated with recurrence of colonic neoplasm after endoscopic resection with a positive lateral margin are not well known. Thus, we evaluate the relationship between recurrence and positive lateral margin after endoscopic en bloc resection of colorectal neoplasm.

Methods: A retrospective review of 9302 patients who underwent colonic endoscopic resection from January 2008 to January 2015. Of these, a total of 76 patients with positive lateral margins with clear evidence of the its location on endoscopic picture after endoscopic en bloc resection of colorectal neoplasm (>10?mm) were included.

Results: Ten of 76 (13.2%) patients experienced recurrence during the follow-up period (mean f/u month, 21.7?±?15.6). In cases with positive lateral margins, the 3- and 5-year local recurrence rate of colorectal neoplasm was 28.1% and 40.1%, respectively. The histological features of the recurrence group were as follows: one case of adenocarcinoma [from low-grade adenoma (LGA)]; two cases of high-grade adenoma (HGA) (one from HGA and one from LGA); and seven cases of LGA (four from adenocarcinoma, two from LGA, and one from HGA). The mean age of patients, locations of the lesions, and histologic type were not significantly associated with local recurrence. In multivariate Poisson regression analyses, total length of lateral margin involvement ≥8?mm (relative risk 12.51; 95% CI 1.11–140.34, p?=?.040) was a significant predictor of local recurrence.

Conclusions: Positive lateral margins ≥8?mm may be a reliable predictor of local recurrence after endoscopic en bloc resection of colorectal neoplasm.     

Leiomyosarcoma of the rectum: The military experience

Leiomyosarcoma of the rectum is a rare neoplasm and may behave in a highly malignant manner. Our experience with a single case prompted a review of the Armed Forces Central Medical Registry (AFCMR), where six other cases were found from the total AFCMR population. Four patients were treated with abdominoperineal (AP) resection; three had local excision only. Three patients developed metastatic disease and two of those died. The authors recommed prompt wide excision (AP resection) for any case of leiomyosarcoma of the rectum. This communication does not necessarily represent the view of the U.S. Air Force. Reprints of this article are not available.     

Extended resection for locally advanced primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum

To determine the perioperative mortality and morbidity and the long-term prognosis of patients undergoing extended pelvic resections for localized advanced primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum, the authors reviewed their experience with 65 patients operated on between 1956 and 1984. Local invasion without distant metastasis was present in all patients at operation anden bloc resection of all involved organs was performed with intent of cure. Average age at operation was 61 years; 15 (23 percent) were men and 50 (77 percent) were women. Operations included abdominoperineal resection in 37 patients (57 percent), low anterior resection in 20 patients (31 percent), and Hartmann procedure in 8 patients (12 percent). Additionally, 34 of 42 women (81 percent) with intact uteri underwenten bloc hysterectomy, 37 of 48 women (77 percent) with intact ovaries had oophorectomy, and 25 of 50 women (50 percent) had partial vaginal resection. Seventeen of the 65 patients (26 percent) had a cystectomy, and 2 patients had a portion of small intestine resected in continuity with their tumor. Pathologic examination revealed lymph node involvement in 29 patients (45 percent) and histologic confirmation of adjacent organ extension in 37 patients (57 percent). There were no perioperative deaths, the average survival was 5.7 years, and 25 patients (38 percent) were alive after a mean follow-up period of 9.3 years. Overall five-year survival was 52 percent. Forty patients died during the follow-up period, with 26 (65 percent) of the deaths attributable to either recurrent carcinoma (25 patients) or a new primary lesion (1 patient). The cumulative probability of tumor recurrence at five years was 39 percent. Read in part at the annual meeting of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Houston, Texas, May 11 to 15, 1986.