BAROS: An Effective System to Evaluate the Results of Patients after Bariatric Surgery

Background: Success in bariatric surgery is most often evaluated by a sufficient loss of excess weight and an improvement in the medical conditions. The expected increase in quality of life (QoL) after weight loss, however, has not often been systematically analyzed. BAROS (Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System) is a scoring system which, along with easy handling, allows comparisons to be made internationally. Methods: 386 morbidly obese patients who had undergone bariatric surgery in our hospital were evaluated with BAROS. Five categories - failure, fair, good, very good, excellent - were taken from the scoring system that BAROS offers. This system has three major points: excess weight loss, medical co-morbidities and QoL. Points are subtracted for reoperations and defined complications. The operations performed were silastic ring vertical gastroplasty (72%), adjustable gastric banding (23%), biliopancreatic diversion (3%), vertical banded gastroplasty (1%) and gastric banding of Molina (1%). Results: In 1991 and 1993, we had a fair result in 3% and 10% of the patients. A good score with a mean of 3.6 to 4.1 was reached in 1992, 1994 and 1995. In the last 3 years, 1996 to 1998, the mean score was 5.0 to 5.7, which is a very good result when compared with the scoring key. Conclusion: BAROS is a valuable tool to access the QoL of patients who have undergone bariatric surgery.     

Quality of life after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding using the Baros and Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of weight reduction surgery is not only to decrease excess weight, but also to improve obesity related comorbidities and quality of life (QoL). Until now, few studies have utilized objective methods to evaluate all of these issues. Hereafter, using the newly developed Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II (M-A QoLQ II) incorporated into the Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS), we report our results for patients undergoing laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). METHODS: M-A QoLQ II questionnaires were sent to patients undergoing LAGB at a single institution. Nonresponders were contacted by a second mailing and telephone calls. The respondents' data were scored according to BAROS guidelines. RESULTS: Data from 67 patients with a mean follow-up of 27 months (22-35) were analyzed. Mean age was 43.8 years (range, 21 to 68) with a mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) of 49.8 kg/m2 (range, 38.4 to 67.7). Mean postoperative BMI was 37.1 kg/m2 (range, 23.0 to 53.4) for a mean excess weight loss (EWL) of 53.2% (range, -7.5% to 108.6%). According to the BAROS scoring system, 8 patients (12%) were classified as failures, 13 patients (19%) had fair, 24 (36%) had good, 13 (19%) had very good, and 9 (13%) had excellent results. There was considerable improvement in patient's comorbidities, and positive scores for self-esteem, and activity level. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the M-A QoLQ II is an efficient method of assessing the success of bariatric surgery. Widespread use of the questionnaire would assist in standardizing reporting of results following bariatric surgery. Our results suggest that LAGB may lead to excellent results with regards to resolution of comorbidities, improvement in QoL, and overall weight loss.     

Long-term BAROS scores and independent obesity-related co-morbidity predictors of failure after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BackgroundLong-term (>5 yr) studies assessing outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) using the Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS) are limited. Evidence of predictors of failure long-term after LRYGB is also lacking.ObjectivesTo compare BAROS scores at 5 and 10 years post LRYGB and to establish whether individual obesity-related co-morbidities are associated with suboptimal outcomes at these time points.SettingSingle bariatric unit.MethodsBAROS scores were analyzed in patients who were 5 years (group A) and 10 years (group B) post LRYGB. Obesity-related co-morbidities as predictors of failure of surgery (defined by % excess weight loss [%EWL] <50% or BAROS total score ≤1) were examined. Intergroup comparative analysis of outcomes and logistic regression modeling to determine predictors of weight loss failure were conducted.ResultsA total of 88 patients were 5 years post LRYGB (group A), and 91 patients were 10 years post LRYGB (group B). A total of 52.3% (46/88) in group A and 54.9% (50/91) in group B had failure of weight loss defined by %EWL <50%. There were no significant differences in percentage of total weight loss, %EWL, or BAROS scores between the 2 groups (21.8% versus 22.0%, P = .897; 48.5% versus 47.1%, P = .993; and 3.7 versus 3.3, P = .332, respectively). No individual obesity-related co-morbidity at time of surgery was associated with suboptimal outcomes (%EWL <50% or BAROS total score ≤1) at 5 years or 10 years after LRYGB.ConclusionsLong-term outcomes assessed by the BAROS score appear sustainable between 5 and 10 years after LRYGB surgery, and weight loss achieved at 5 years is maintained at 10 years. Preoperative presence of specific obesity-related co-morbidities was not associated with failure of surgery long-term.     

Long-term results after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a mean fourteen year follow-up study

BackgroundFor over a decade, the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) was 1 of the most performed bariatric procedures in Europe. This study is a retrospective analysis with prospectively collected data of the experience in 1 specialized Dutch center with the adjustable gastric band over 14 years.MethodsBetween 1995 and 2003, 201 patients underwent an LAGB for morbid obesity in our hospital. Data on preoperative clinical characteristic, postoperative outcome and weight loss patterns, and co-morbidities for up to 18 years are presented and evaluated using the Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS).ResultsAverage follow-up was 13.6 (±2.0) years (163 mo) and 99% of patients with complete follow-up. Two thirds of patients reached an excess weight loss (EWL)>50% at some point after LAGB placement. However, due to insufficient weight loss or complications in 53% of patients, the LAGB had to be removed or converted to a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Additionally, half of the remaining patients had disappointing results according to the BAROS score. In total, less than one quarter (22%) of patients had a functioning band with a good result after the follow-up period. Although initially the number of patients experiencing co-morbidities was reduced, most of them returned and a large number of patients developed new co-morbidities. Complications, other than weight regain, were numerous as 47% of patients experienced at least 1. In total, 204 reoperations were performed in 137 (68%) patients. Furthermore, patients who were lost to follow-up did almost twice as bad in terms of EWL compared to patients who had regular follow-up.ConclusionMorbid obesity is a chronic disease that can be resolved with bariatric surgery. One of the treatment options is the LAGB, which in the short term shows good results in terms of EWL and co-morbidity reduction. In the long term, however, EWL and co-morbidity reduction are disappointing, and the LAGB does not seem to live up to expectations. Besides the decrease in EWL over time, the number of reoperations required is alarming. In total, less than a quarter of patients still had a functioning band after a mean 14 years of follow-up.     

The Bariatric Quality of Life (BQL) Index: A Measure of Well-being in Obesity Surgery Patients

Background: Quality of life (QoL) is considered to be the true measure for the effectiveness of a surgical procedure, but there are only a few validated instruments available for bariatric surgery. Therefore, a new diseasespecific 30-item instrument was created, which was called Bariatric Quality of Life (BQL) questionnaire. Methods: To validate the BQL, we studied 133 patients after 4 different types of bariatric surgery. Initially, mean body mass index (BMI) was 47.2 ±7.6 kg/m² and mean age was 38.8 ±11.0 years. At baseline, and 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery, patients filled in the BQL, the SF-12 (Short Form of SF-36 Health Survey), the GIQLI (Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index), and the BAROS (Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System). Results: Internal consistency of the BQL was found to be good, with Cronbach's alpha ranging between 0.71 and 0.86. Factor analyses suggested that the BQL included a highly consistent set of QoL items and a second part on co-morbidities and gastrointestinal symptoms. At the 12 months follow-up, the BQL was closely correlated to SF 12 (Pearson's r = 0.86), GIQLI (0.68), BAROS (0.71), and excess weight loss (0.55). Standardized effect sizes over time were larger for the BQL (1.39 and 1.58) than for the other instruments. Conclusions: The BQL questionnaire is a validated instrument ready for clinical use.     

Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS) Applied to Laparoscopic Gastric Banding Patients

Background: The definition of success and failure of a bariatric procedure should include weight loss as well as improvement in comorbidity and quality of life assessment. The Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS), introduced by Oria and Moorhead in 1997, seems to provide a standard for comparison in the surgical treatment of morbid obesity. Methods: 180 morbidly obese and super-obese patients, who underwent laparoscopic gastric banding (lap-band) at our institutions and had a follow-up > 18 months (19-55 months) were evaluated with BAROS. Results: The patients were divided into four outcome groups (failure, fair, good, and excellent) based on a scoring table that adds or subtracts points while evaluating three main areas: percentage of excess weight loss, changes in medical conditions, and assessment of quality of life. Points were deducted for complications and reoperative surgery. Conclusions: The BAROS outcome system has proved to be a useful instrument in evaluating midterm results in our series of lap-band patients.     

Outcome of revisional bariatric surgery for insufficient weight loss after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an observational study

BackgroundInsufficient weight loss or secondary weight regain with or without recurrence of comorbidity can occur years after laparoscopic Roux en Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). In selected patients, increasing restriction or adding malabsorption may be a surgical option after conservative measures failed.ObjectivesEvaluation of short and long term results of revisional surgery for insufficient weight loss or weight regain after LRYGB.SettingTertiary hospital.MethodsRetrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a cohort of 1150 LRYGB patients. Included were patients, who underwent revisional bariatric surgery after LRYGB for insufficient weight loss with a follow-up of minimal 1 year.ResultsFifty-four patients were included in the analysis. After an interdisciplinary evaluation, patients with insufficient weight loss, signs of dumping syndrome, and lacking restriction were offered a nonadjustable band around the pouch (banded group, n = 34) and patients with sufficient restriction, excellent compliance, and adherence were offered a revision to laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion (BPD group, n = 20). The revisional procedure was performed 3.3 ± 2.3 years after LRYGB in the banded-group and after 6.4 ± 4.3 years in the BPD group (P = .001). Mean body mass index at the time of the primary bariatric procedure was 41.7 ± 6.2 kg/m² in the banded group and 45.2 ± 8.2 kg/m² in the BPD group (P = .08); minimal body mass index between both operations was 29.1 ± 4.7 kg/m² in the banded group and 36.5 ± 9.4 kg/m² in the BPD group, and, at the time of revisional surgery, 31.4 ± 5.5 kg/m² in the banded group and 40.8 ± 6.7 kg/m² in the BPD group (P = .0001). The mean body mass index difference 1 year after revisional surgery was 1.3 ± 3.0 kg/m² in the banded group and 6.7 ± 4.5 kg/m² in the BPD group (P = .01). In the banded group, 11 patients (32.4%) needed removal of the band, 4 patients (11.8%) needed an adjustment, and 4 patients (11.8%) were later converted to BPD. In the BPD group, 2 (10.0%) patients needed revision for severe protein malabsorption.ConclusionsInsufficient weight loss or secondary weight regain after LRYGB is a rare indication for revisional surgery. Banded bypass has modest results for additional weight loss but can help patients suffering from dumping. In very carefully selected cases, BPD can achieve additional weight loss with acceptable complication rate but higher risk for reoperation. Future “adjuvant medical treatments,” such as glucagon-like peptide 1 analogues and other pharmacologic treatment options could be an alternative for achieving additional weight loss and better metabolic response.     

Postoperative Morbidity of Biliopancreatic Diversion Depending on Common Limb Length

Background Laparoscopic gastric bypass, currently the most popular surgical method for bariatric therapy, have proved to be effective in weight loss, but some matters regarding its long-term efficacy for super-obese patients (BMI >50 kg/m²) have arisen. Biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) is a complex technique that has shown good results in the treatment of the super-obese patient. We analyze our >5 years results, evaluating weight loss, morbidity and mortality of this operation, depending on the length of the common and alimentary limbs. Methods We studied two series of patients: 150 patients with BPD of Scopinaro (50–200 cm) and 70 patients with modified BPD (75–225 cm). The results have been analyzed in terms of weight loss, co-morbidity improvement, and postoperative morbidity using BAROS. Results Range of follow-up is 1–12 years. Weight loss was slightly higher for the Scopinaro group than for the Modified group but with no significant difference. There was more prevalence of malnutrition and of iron deficiency in the Scopinaro group (16% and 60%) than in the modified group (2% and 40%), with similar postoperative morbidities. Conclusion The modified BPD method (75–225 cm) shows long-term effectiveness in weight loss and comorbidity improvement for super-obesity. Proteins, vitamins and oligoelement deficits appear distant in time, and thus it is necessary to maintain strict followup of these patients and supplement against deficiencies for the rest of their lives.     

Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life Following Gastric Bypass: Influence of Depression

Background: Severe obesity has been associated with impaired quality of life (QoL). We evaluated the long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after gastric bypass. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 50 morbidly obese patients >5 years after gastric bypass and on a control group of 78 non-operated morbidly obese patients. Both groups were evaluated for the EuroQol 5D measure and the Goldberg General Health Questionnaire. In addition, the Bariatric Analysis of Reporting Outcome System (BAROS) was applied to the surgical group. Depression and severe life events were included in the analysis. Logistic Regresion Model was used, and age was included in the analysis. Results: Groups were similar except for mean age (lower in the surgical group: 40.5±9.0 vs 46.1±8.8 years, P=0.026). 86.5% of patients had >50% Excess Weight Loss. 85.7% showed an improvement in co-morbid conditions. BAROS Global score: 22% excellent, 56% very good, 18% good, 2% fair and 2% failure. After surgery, significant improvements were reported in self-esteem (94%), work conditions (72.6%), physical activity (66.7%), and sexual interest/activity (50.9%). The control group showed poorer results for the EuroQol 5D in mobility (55% vs 21.6%, P=0.005), difficulty with daily activity (55% vs 13.7%, P=0.005) and self-evaluation of well-being (59.2% vs 78.1%, P=0.005). Patients with depression or insufficient weight loss following surgery presented poorer global evaluation in HRQoL. Conclusion: Gastric bypass resulted in significant long-term improvements in co-morbidities, sustained weight loss and increased HRQoL. Depression and insufficient weight loss were associated with poorer HRQoL in surgical patients.     

Conversion of gastric sleeve to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and biliopancreatic diversion/duodenal switch: safe and viable options

BackgroundSleeve gastrectomy (SG) remains the most performed bariatric surgery. As numbers of SG increase, so do the numbers of patients requiring conversion for insufficient weight loss or weight regain. However, the literature has cited complication rates as high as 30%for reoperative bariatric surgery.ObjectiveWith the recent inclusion of conversion surgery variables in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database, we compared the safety and efficacy of SG conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus biliopancreatic diversion and duodenal switch (BPD/DS).SettingMBSAQIP database.MethodsAnalysis of the 2020 MBSAQIP Participant Use Files revealed 6020 patientswho underwent SG conversion to RYGB (5348) and BPD/DS (672). We examined 30-day outcomes including death, anastomotic leak, readmission, any complication, dehydration, and weight loss.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in mortality (.12% versus 0%) or; complication rate (6.5% versus 5.1%) with SG conversion to RYGB or BPD/DS. There was a statistically significant difference in anastomotic leak (.5% versus 1.2%, P = .024).Interestingly, BPD/DS was less likely to require dehydration treatments (4.2% versus 2.2%, P = .009) and had fewer readmissions within 30 days (7.3% versus 5.4%, P = .043).ConclusionsComplication rates after conversion of SG to RYGB or BPD/DS may be significantly lower than previously reported and only slightly higher than after primary weight loss surgery. SG conversion to either RYGB or BPD/DS remain safe, viable options forpatients who had insufficient weight loss or regain, and BPD/DS may be the better option in the appropriate patient.     

Systematic Review of Medium-Term Weight Loss after Bariatric Operations

Background: Although bariatric surgery is known to be effective in the short term, the durability of that effect has not been convincingly demonstrated over the medium term (>3 years) and the long term (>10 years). The authors studied the durability of weight loss after bariatric surgery based on a systematic review of the published literature. Methods: All reports published up to September, 2005 were included if they were full papers in refereed journals published in English, of outcomes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP), and its hybrid procedures of banded bypass (Banded RYGBP) and longlimb bypass (LL-RYGBP), biliopancreatic diversion with or without duodenal switch (BPD±DS) or laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). All reports that had at least 100 patients at commencement, and provided ≥3 years of follow-up data were included. Results: From a total of 1,703 reports extracted, 43 reports fulfilled the entry criteria (18 RYGBP; 18 LAGB; 7 BPD). Pooled data from all the bariatric operations showed effective and durable weight loss to 10 years. Mean %EWL for standard RYGBP was higher than for LAGB at years 1 and 2 (67 vs 42; 67 vs 53) but not different at 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7 years (62 vs 55; 58 vs 55; 58 vs 55; 53 vs 50; and 55 vs 51). There was 59 %EWL for LAGB at 8 years, and 52 %EWL for RYGBP at 10 years. Both the BPD±DS and the Banded RYGBP appeared to show better weight loss than standard RYGBP and LAGB, but with statistically significant differences present at year 5 alone. The LL-RYGBP was not associated with improved %EWL. Important limitations include lack of data on loss to follow-up, failure to identify numbers of patients measured at each data point and lack of data beyond 10 years. Conclusions: All current bariatric operations lead to major weight loss in the medium term. BPD and Banded RYGBP appear to be more effective than both RYGBP and LAGB which are equal in the medium term.     

Measuring Outcomes following Bariatric Surgery: Weight Loss Parameters,Improvement in Co-morbid Conditions,Change in Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction

Restrictive and particularly malabsorptive bariatric operations achieve significant sustained weight loss. Results from different operations have been difficult to compare.The aims of this review are: 1) to indicate the limitations of outcomes reported as weight-related parameters; 2) to document some of the patient characteristics that impact weight loss; 3) to assess the literature documenting improvement in obesity-related medical conditions; and 4) to review studies that quantitate changes in health-related quality of life (QoL). Weight-related parameters such as body mass index and % excess weight inconsistently correlate with body fat. Direct determination of body fat with bioelectric impedance may offer more reliable outcome parameters. Patient characteristics such as gender, age, weight, body mass index, ethnicity, race and socioeconomic status affect weight loss following bariatric operations. Improvements in co-morbid conditions are poorly documented in many studies. Standardized instruments that assess health-related QoL have shown differing values. SF-36 has given inconsistent results following bariatric operations. Both BAROS and IWQoL-Lite have demonstrated significant improvements after surgery. Bariatric surgeons have rarely used patient satisfaction as an outcome parameter. This review suggests that bariatric operations should be judged by change in fat mass or fat mass index, improvement in obesity-related medical conditions, change in health-related QoL as judged by standardized instruments, and level of patient satisfaction. In addition, surgeons should characterize their study population and report outcomes for sub-populations.     

Short-Term Liver Function after Biliopancreatic Diversion

Background: Liver failure after biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) has been reported. Although in our series of 2,515 BPD with a minimum follow-up of 12 months we have never observed this complication, a transitory and significant rise in serum AST and ALT has been detected in some cases, suggesting the occurrence of transient liver damage. To assess if risk factors for acute liver damage after BPD could be identified, we studied the evolution of hepatic biochemistry in a sample of our operated subjects. Methods: We studied 99 consecutive patients submitted to the same type of BPD (ad hoc stomach, ad hoc alimentary limb). Patients with a history of alcohol consumption or positive hepatic serology were excluded. Preoperative body weight (BW), body mass index (BMI), excess weight (EW), % excess weight (%EW), fasting serum glucose level (SG), hepatic histology (HI), weight loss (WL) at 2, 4 and 12 months, and excess weight % loss (IEW%L) at the same time were correlated with preoperative and 2, 4 and 12 months hepatic biochemistry. Results: Compared with preoperative values, AST levels at 2 months significantly increased (Student's t-test, P=0.0003) and significantly decreased at 12 months (P=0.0001). Spearman's Rank test showed significant correlations between 2 months AST levels and WL at 2 months (P =0.005), preoperative BW (P <0.0001), SG (P =0.01), and HI (inflammation P<0.0001, fibrosis P=0.001). Conclusion: Hepatocellular necrosis in our series peaks at 2 months, and decreases afterwards.WL at 2 months, preoperative BW, SG and HI seem to be of help in identifying patients at increased risk for acute liver damage, prompting the need for an enhanced surveillance.     

The Decrease in Plasma Ghrelin Concentrations following Bariatric Surgery Depends on the Functional Integrity of the Fundus

Background: Gastric bypass surgery, which involves the production of a reduced stomach pouch,has been shown to markedly suppress circulating ghrelin concentrations. Since bypassing the ghrelin-producing cell population may be relevant to the disruption of fundic-derived factors participating in food intake signaling, the effect of weight loss induced by either adjustable gastric banding (AGB), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) or biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) was studied. Methods: 16 matched obese patients [35.0 + 2.4 years; initial body weight 124.8 ± 5.7 kg; body mass index (BMI) 47.1 ± 2.2 kg/m²] in whom similar weight loss had been achieved by either AGB (n=7), RYGBP (n=6) or BPD (n=3) were studied. Blood was obtained for biochemical and hormonal analyses. Body composition was assessed by air-displacement-plethysmography. Results: Comparable weight loss (AGB: 26.1 ± 5.1 kg; RYGBP: 32.1 ± 5.0; BPD: 31.7 ± 6.1; P=NS) and decrease in percentage body fat (AGB: 10.0 ± 1.5%; RYGBP: 14.2 ± 2.8; BPD: 10.3 ± 1.0; P=NS) induced by bariatric surgery exerted significantly different (P=0.004) effects on plasma ghrelin concentrations, depending on the surgical procedure applied (AGB: 480 ± 78 pg/ml; RYGBP: 117 ± 34; BPD: 406 ± 86). Without significant differences in BMI, body fat, glucose, triglycerides, cholesterol, insulin and leptin levels, patients who had undergone the RYGBP exhibited statistically significant diminished circulating fasting plasma ghrelin concentrations compared with the other two bariatric techniques which conserve direct contact of the fundus with ingested food (P=0.003 vs AGB and P=0.020 vs BPD). Conclusion: Fasting circulating ghrelin concentrations in patients undergoing diverse bariatric operations depend on the degree of dysfunctionality of the fundus.     

Psychological Condition and Quality of Life in Patients with Morbid Obesity Before and After Surgical Weight Loss

Background: Bariatric surgery results in significant weight loss, improvement or cure of accompanying illnesses, and may lead to important changes in psychological conditions. The aim of this paper is to study the changes in the psychological and emotional lives of patients as well as quality of life during the first 2 years after vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG). Methods: The study population comprised 59 patients, 45 women (76.3%) and 14 men, between 18 and 64 years old. Patients were asked to complete an SCL-90R questionnaire before VBG. 2 years after VBG, patients were again asked to complete an SCL-90R as well as a BAROS questionnaire. Comparisons were made between loss of weight, alteration in the psychological condition and quality of life postoperatively, within the parameters of sex, age, marital status, level of education, duration of obesity and family history of obesity. Results: Women had a greater degree of depression from obesity than their male counterparts before the procedure (P=0.001), while their postoperative emotional improvement was more marked (P=0.008). The General Mental Health Index was higher in female than male patients (P=0.008). At 2 years after VBG, BMI was significantly reduced (P<0.001). Oversensitivity in personal relationships and anxiety affected patients more both pre- and postoperatively. The averages of all the indexes of the subgroups of the SCL-90R, which relates to psychological condition of patients, showed a statistically significant reduction at 2 years following VBG, indicative of the improvement of the patients' psychosomatic condition. The more weight patients lost, the more their quality of life improved, as evaluated by the BAROS (P<0.001). Conclusions: The bariatric surgery most satisfactorily improved the patients' psychosomatic condition, as well as their quality of life, during the first 2 years after VBG.     

Vertical Banded Gastroplasty: 6 Years Experience at a Center in Poland

Background: Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) has been performed in our department as a restrictive operation for treatment of morbid obesity. We assessed efficacy, safety, and quality of life (QoL) after VBG, based on our 6-year experience. Methods: 101 patients with >1 year follow-up who underwent VBG between January 1998 and May 2003, were retrospectively studied. Mean age was 41 years, and mean preoperative BMI was 51.3 kg/m² . Almost 60% of the patients suffered from hypertension, and 25% were diabetic. Postoperative QoL was determined with the BAROS questionnaire. Data concerning weight loss and co-morbidities were collected during the postoperative visits. Results: 87.2% of patients achieved ≥ 50% EWL. 86 patients (85.2%) responded to the BAROS questionnaire. >90% of the patients analyzed according to BAROS, reported improvement in QoL after VBG. No patient reported deterioration in health or well-being after the VBG. Anti-hypertensive medication was discontinued in 26 patients (56.5%) and decreased in the other 15 hypertensive patients (32.6%). 35% of diabetic patients did not require further treatment, while a further 40% had their insulin doses decreased or were switched to oral drugs. Early complications occurred in 4.65%, and consisted of an evisceration, pulmonary embolus and gastric leak. Late complications occurred in 20.9%, and included bleeding from peptic ulcer, incisional hernia, stomal stenosis and staple-line disruption (3.5%). There have been no deaths. Conclusion: VBG provided significant weight reduction and improved QoL in the vast majority of morbidly obese patients. Patients with diabetes and hypertension benefitted because these co-morbidities were improved or disappeared with the weight loss.     

Is selection bias toward super obese patients in the rationing of metabolic surgery justified?—A pilot study from the United Kingdom

BackgroundRecent evidence suggests that National Health Service (NHS) rationing of bariatric surgery is biased toward super-obese patients without scientific basis. The aim of this study was to compare health, quality of life, and employment outcomes in morbidly obese (MO) versus super-obese (SO) patients after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) to provide a basis for rationing.MethodsConsecutive patients undergoing LRYGB from January 2008–September 2009, with baseline body mass index (BMI)<45 kg/m² (MO) and BMI>60 kg/m² (SO) were identified from a prospective database. Seventy-six eligible patients were invited to complete a questionnaire comprising BAROS (bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system), EQ-5D (EuroQol – 5D), EQVAS (Euro-QoL visual analog score), and employment status preoperatively and postoperatively. Anthropometric, demographic, and clinical data were recorded.ResultsFifty-one patients responded: 23 MO and 28 SO. Groups were matched for demographic characteristics and co-morbidities. The MO group had significantly higher percentage excess weight loss (%EWL) (82% versus 53%; t test: P<.001) and mean BAROS score (5.47 versus 4.21; t test: P = .025) than the SO group. EQ-5D improved significantly for both groups in 3 domains (self care, anxiety/depression, and pain/discomfort); there was no significant difference in improvement between groups. EQVAS was significantly higher for the MO group (90 versus 70; Mann-Whitney U: P = .001). Employment status changed for 8 patients postoperatively, but there was no significant difference between groups.ConclusionThese results suggest that MO patients appear to benefit more than SO patients from LRYGB and yet seem to be disadvantaged in some NHS Trusts in the United Kingdom for access to bariatric surgery. This study provides a baseline framework for further research to generate evidence for more scientific rationing of bariatric surgery.     

Evaluation of laparoscopic bariatric surgery using the BAROS score

AIM OF THE STUDY: Mid-term assessment of laparoscopic adjustable silicon gastric banding (Lap-Band) by a specific score. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients received by mail 12 to 54 months after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding a questionnaire including the Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS) which is the only specific and validated instrument for measuring the quality of life after bariatric surgery. This score includes five categories of results (failure, fair, good, very good, excellent). It uses three major fields: the quality of life, excess weight loss, and medical comorbidities evaluation. RESULTS: Seventy three patients answered back with a mean follow up of 24.6 +/- 10 months. Forty six (2/3) had lost more than 50% of their weight excess. Sixty six experienced an improvement of their medical conditions following surgery. Final results were good or excellent for 60 patients (82% of those who answered back). Failure was reported in 7 patients (2 "sweet eaters" and 2 pouch dilatations) which needed a surgical treatment. CONCLUSION: This evaluation based on the BAROS confirms its validation in France and the good mid-term results of bariatric surgery based on the Lap-Band.     

Results of Biliopancreatic Diversion after Five Years

Background: Gastric restrictive procedures, currently the most popular surgical operations for morbid obesity, have proved to be effective in initiating weight loss, but questions regarding their long-term efficacy in weight maintenance have arisen. Biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) is a mixed and complex technique that has shown good long-term results. There are no series with long-term follow-up of BPD in Spain. We present >5 year results (average 67.9 ± 15 SD mons, range 48-96), evaluating weight loss, morbidity and mortality after BPD. Methods: 74 patients who underwent BPD and completed 5 or more years of follow-up were studied. The results have been analyzed in terms of weight loss (classification of Reinhold), improvement in morbidity, and improvement in quality of life (BAROS). Results: 78.6% were women. Mean age was 38 ± 11 years (18-61). Mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 54 ± 8 kg/m². Progression of BMI: 1 year 34 ± 6, 2 years 31 ± 6, 5 years 33 ± 7 and 7 years 31 ± 3 kg/m² . Excess weight loss at 1 year follow-up was 67%, at 2 years 75%, at 5 years 70% and at 7 years 71%. There were significant differences between morbidly obese (BMI <50 kg/m²) and super-obese (BMI >50 kg/m² ), with better results in the morbidly obese group. Conclusion: BPD shows long-term effectiveness in weight loss, co-morbidity improvement and quality of life. Protein, vitamin and oligoelement deficits may appear in the long-term, so that strict follow-up and supplementation of deficiencies are necessary.