Risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma in relation to use of sunbeds: further evidence for UV-A carcinogenicity

In a population-based, matched, case-control study from southern Sweden of 571 patients with a first diagnosis of cutaneous malignant melanoma and 913 healthy controls aged 16-80 years, the association between sunbed use and malignant melanoma was evaluated. A total of 250 (44%) cases and 372 (41%) controls reported ever having used sunbeds. A significantly elevated odds ratio for developing malignant melanoma after regular exposure to sunbeds was found, adjusted for hair colour, raised naevi, skin type and number of sunburns (odds ratio (OR) 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-2.7). A dose-response relationship between total number of sunbed uses and melanoma risk was only found up to the level of 250 times. The OR was higher in individuals younger than age 36 years (adjusted OR 8.1, 95% CI 1.3-49.5 for regular vs. never use). The association seemed to be true only for subjects with black/dark brown or light brown hair and among females. Lesions of the extremities showed the strongest association of increased risk with sunbed use. An increased risk was related to commercial exposure and to exposure during the winter. The results substantiate the hypothesis that exposure to sunbeds might increase the risk of developing malignant melanoma.     

Exposure to the sun and sunbeds and the risk of cutaneous melanoma in the UK: a case-control study

Migration, latitude and case-control studies have clearly established a link between melanoma and sun exposure. This case-control study of melanoma was set up to examine the role of sun exposure and sunbeds in the pathogenesis of melanoma in the United Kingdom (UK), a country with low levels of ultraviolet radiation. The study included 413 cases and 416 controls. More than 10 severe sunburns compared with less than 10 sunburns was associated with an Odds Ratio (OR) of 1.98 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.02-3.86) (P=0.04) when adjusted for age, gender and skin type. Sunburns before the age of 15 years were not associated with melanoma once adjustments for age, gender and skin were made. 31% of women and 16% of the men had used sunbeds. Sunbed users were younger than non-users (40 years versus 51 years, P<0.0001). Ever use of sunbeds gave an adjusted OR of 1.19 (95% CI 0.84-1.68) (P=0.33). The risk of melanoma did not increase with increasing hours or years of sunbed exposure. The risk associated with sunbed use was only significant for young individuals with fair skin for whom there was a significant OR of 2.66 (95% CI 1.66-6.09) (P=0.02) after adjustment for the sun exposure variables. Outdoor occupation and residence in hot countries were not associated with an increased risk of melanoma. The only significant associations in this study were with 10 or more sunburns and the use of a sunbed in young subjects with fair skin. Sunbed use is now becoming more prevalent in Caucasian populations and the results of this study suggest that sunbed usage may moderately affect individuals with sun-sensitive skin types. However, the magnitude of melanoma risk in association with natural and artificial sun exposure is small compared with phenotypic risk factors such as skin type and naevus counts. However, it is possible that the mean lag time of 7 years between exposure to sunbed and melanoma in this study may have led to an under-estimation of the long-term melanoma risk.     

Tanning beds, sunlamps, and risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma.

BACKGROUND: A number of studies have been conducted evaluating the risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma after exposure to sunlamps and/or sunbeds. The proportion of subjects in the individual studies who have reported exposure has, in general, been modest, and the resulting risk estimates for melanoma have been unstable with wide 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The inconclusive results seen in individual studies have resulted in confusion as to the carcinogenicity of these devices. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of these studies. A review of the literature from Jan 1, 1984 to April 2004 using MEDLINE identified 12 case-control studies and 1 cohort study which quantitatively evaluated the use of sunlamps and/or sunbeds and subsequent melanoma. After applying exclusion/inclusion criteria, 9 case-control and 1 cohort study provided data for the analysis. Summary odds ratios (OR) and 95% CIs for sunlamp/sunbed use and subsequent melanoma were calculated using a random-effect model. RESULTS: Ten studies provided data for assessment of melanoma risk among subjects who reported "ever" being exposed compared with those "never" exposed. A positive association was found between exposure and risk (summary OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.05-1.49). Significant heterogeneity between studies was present. Evaluation of the metrics "first exposure as a young adult" (5 studies) and "longest duration or highest frequency of exposure" (6 studies) also yielded significantly elevated risk estimates (summary OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.32-2.18, and 1.61; 95% CI, 1.21-2.12, respectively, with no heterogeneity in either analysis). CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate a significantly increased risk of cutaneous melanoma subsequent to sunbed/sunlamp exposure.     

A multicentre epidemiological study on sunbed use and cutaneous melanoma in Europe

A large European case-control study investigated the association between sunbed use and cutaneous melanoma in an adult population aged between 18 and 49 years. Between 1999 and 2001 sun and sunbed exposure was recorded in 597 newly diagnosed melanoma cases and 622 controls in Belgium, France, The Netherlands, Sweden and the UK. Fifty three percent of cases and 57% of controls ever used sunbeds. The overall adjusted odds ratio (OR) associated with ever sunbed use was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.71-1.14). There was a South-to-North gradient with high prevalence of sunbed exposure in Northern Europe and lower prevalence in the South (prevalence of use in France 20%, OR: 1.19 (0.68-2.07) compared to Sweden, prevalence 83%, relative risk 0.62 (0.26-1.46)). Dose and lag-time between first exposure to sunbeds and time of study were not associated with melanoma risk, neither were sunbathing and sunburns (adjusted OR for mean number of weeks spent in sunny climates >14 years: 1.12 (0.88-1.43); adjusted OR for any sunburn >14 years: 1.16 (0.9-1.45)). Host factors such as numbers of naevi and skin type were the strongest risk indicators for melanoma. Public health campaigns have improved knowledge regarding risk of UV-radiation for skin cancers and this may have led to recall and selection biases in both cases and controls in this study. Sunbed exposure has become increasingly prevalent over the last 20 years, especially in Northern Europe but the full impact of this exposure on skin cancers may not become apparent for many years.     

Perspectives in melanoma prevention: the case of sunbeds

The incidence of cutaneous malignant melanoma (melanoma) and of basal cell carcinoma is still increasing in most fair-skinned populations. The fashion of intermittent exposure to solar ultraviolet (UV) radiations is considered the main cause of this increase. In 20 years time, tan acquisition through exposure to artificial sources of UV radiations has become frequent among fair-skinned adolescents and young adults. Modern sunbeds are powerful sources of UV radiations that do not exist in the nature, and repeated exposures to high doses of UVA constitute a new phenomenon in humans. A large prospective cohort study on 106,379 Norwegian and Swedish women conducted between 1991 and 1999 has provided evidence for a significant, moderate increase in melanoma risk among regular sunbed users. Failure of past case-control studies to document with consistency the sunbed-melanoma association was probably due to a too short latency period between sunbed use and melanoma diagnosis, and to too few subjects with high total durations of sunbed use. Regulations of sunbed installation, operation and use should become standardised across the 25 European Union countries. Enforcement of regulations in tanning parlours remains inadequate. In contrast, the existence of regulations is presented by many tanning salon operators as a guarantee that sunbed use is safe. We stress the need for the control of information disseminated by the "tanning industry" on suppositions that sunbed use is safer than sun exposure, and on the hypothetical health benefits of tanning. New fluorescent UV lamps are proposed that have a spectrum similar to the midday sun. Given the known association between intermittent sun exposure and melanoma, public-health authorities should reconsider the soundness of the commercialisation of these lamps.     

Public awareness about risk factors could pose problems for case-control studies: the example of sunbed use and cutaneous melanoma

In a large case-control study we found no association between sunbed use and melanoma risk, but indications for potential recall and recruitment biases made the interpretation of the results difficult. Associations with skin phototype (adj OR for skin type I vs. IV: (2.6, 95% CI 1.5-4.8)), hair colour (adj OR red/blond vs. brown/black 2.0 (95% CI 1.4-2.8)) and number of naevi on both arms (OR>10 vs. 10 3.13 (95% CI: 2.47; 3.97)) were comparable to previous studies, but negative associations were found between sun exposure and melanoma risk (adj. OR 0.87 (95% CI: 0.65-1.18)) and in cases between sun exposure and naevus count. These observations led us to speculate that cases may have underreported their sun exposure and, most likely, their sunbed exposure. High percentages of sunbed use among controls indicated possible recruitment bias: eligible controls who were sunbed users were probably more likely to accept the invitation to participate than non-users, possibly due to a feeling of 'guilt' or 'worry' about their habits. Such selective participation may have strongly influenced the risk estimates of sunbed use in our study.     

Sunbed use during adolescence and early adulthood is associated with increased risk of early‐onset melanoma

Sunbed use is associated with increased risk of melanoma. Younger people might be more susceptible to the carcinogenic effects of ultraviolet radiation. We investigated the association between sunbed use and risk of early‐onset cutaneous malignant melanoma. From the Australian Melanoma Family Study, a multicentre, population‐based, case‐control‐family study, we analysed data for 604 cases diagnosed between ages 18 and 39 years and 479 controls. Data were collected by interview. Associations were estimated as odds ratios (ORs) using unconditional logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, city, education, family history, skin color, usual skin response to sunlight and sun exposure. Compared with having never used a sunbed, the OR for melanoma associated with ever‐use was 1.41 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01–1.96), and 2.01 (95% CI 1.22–3.31) for more than 10 lifetime sessions (P_trend 0.01 with cumulative use). The association was stronger for earlier age at first use (P_trend 0.02). The association was also stronger for melanoma diagnosed when aged 18–29 years (OR for more than 10 lifetime sessions = 6.57, 95% CI 1.41–30.49) than for melanoma diagnosed when 30–39 years (OR 1.60, 95% CI 0.92–2.77; P_interaction 0.01). Among those who had ever used a sunbed and were diagnosed between 18 and 29 years of age, three quarters (76%) of melanomas were attributable to sunbed use. Sunbed use is associated with increased risk of early‐onset melanoma, with risk increasing with greater use, an earlier age at first use and for earlier onset disease.     

Attitudes, beliefs and behaviour regarding the use of sunbeds amongst healthcare workers in Bradford

Although cosmetic tanning and unprotected solar exposure are common, little is known about general attitudes, beliefs and behaviour regarding the use of sunbeds. We sought to determine the frequency of sunbed use in a select sample and to assess the knowledge and beliefs regarding this behaviour. A self-administered anonymous questionnaire was distributed to a sample of 648 employees working for Bradford Hospitals NHS Trust. The questionnaire explored demographic information (including hair and skin type, family history with skin cancer), frequency of sunbed use, knowledge about the risks of UV exposure and motivations for practising this behaviour. Four hundred and eighteen women and 52 men completed the questionnaire, making a response rate of 73%. Nearly half of respondents (207; 44%) reported using sunbeds to some extent; of these 12% reported frequent use. Appearance ('to look better') was the most popular reason given by respondents for using sunbeds, followed by 'feel healthy'. Frequency of using sunbeds was found to be negatively correlated with the age of respondents and the existence of family experience with skin cancer, and strongly associated with the opinion that it is safer to use a sunbed than sunbathing outdoors, the female sex and smoking. It is clear from this study that the psychological factors that influence sunbed use are complex and that so far public education campaigns have had little impact on it. This study highlights some of these psychological factors.     

Cutaneous malignant melanoma and exposure to sunlamps or sunbeds: An eortc multicenter case-control study in Belgium,France and Germany

The study objective was to assess whether exposure to sunlamps and sunbeds represents a risk factor for cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM). A 1-to-1 unmatched case-control study was conducted among subjects 20 years old or more with naturally non-pigmented skin in Germany, France and Belgium. A total of 420 consecutive patients with CMM diagnosed from I January 1991 onward were derived from hospital registers; 447 controls with no history of skin cancer were chosen at random in the same municipality as the cases. Exposure to sunlamps or sunbeds starting before 1960 is associated with a crude estimated risk of CMM of 2.71 (95% CI: 1.06-7.78) for at least 10 hr of accumulated exposure. This risk is of 2.12 (95% CI: 0.84-5.37) after adjustment for age, sex, hair colour and average number of holiday weeks each year in sunny resorts. Subjects who experienced skin-burn due to sunlamps or sunbeds, and who had accumulated at least 10 hr of exposure, displayed a crude estimated CMM risk of 4.47 (95% CI: 1.45-13.7), which rose to 8.97 (95% CI: 2.10-38.6) for those who exposed their skin for tanning purposes. The risk associated with skin-bum is only marginally modified after multiple adjustments for host characteristics and recreational exposure to sunlight. Apparently, sunlamps and sunbeds share the increased risk of CMM, which seems to concentrate in subjects exhibiting hazardous behaviour towards ultraviolet radiation sources. However, although it is reasonable to believe that high doses of pure ultraviolet A radiation can be dangerous, this is not firmly established by this study. Most exposures to ultraviolet A tanning devices began after 1980; therefore, epidemiologic studies have difficulty in revealing any increase in risk of CMM starting after 1980 because of the latent period between exposure and occurrence of melanoma. Public health authorities should have a cautious approach towards the rapidly developing fashion of tanning under sunlamps or sunbeds.     

Sunbed use at home: risk behaviour and psychosocial determinants.

The objective of this study was to analyse the behaviour of people with regard to sunbed use at home, and to analyse the psychosocial determinants of intention and behaviour with regard to limiting the health risk of using sunbeds at home. Data were collected by means of a telephone survey among 349 adults from the Dutch general public who use sunbeds at home (response=95%). Determinants that were assessed were: attitude with respect to safer use and the use of sunbeds in general, the social influences people encounter to use sunbeds in a safer way, and the self-efficacy expectations people have of their ability to use sunbeds more safely. The results showed that there were great differences between people's perceptions of their safe sunbed behaviour, and their actual safety behaviour. Almost all respondents (94%) thought that their sunbed behaviour was safe, while in reality only 37% of the respondents used the sunbed in accordance with the safety guidelines. The safer users of sunbeds differed on many determinants from the unsafe users. Intention to minimize the health risk when using sunbeds could be predicted by a person's perceived self-efficacy, the overall attitude and anticipated regret beliefs (R2=0.52). Sunbed users should be made aware of their risk behaviour with regard to sunbeds as well as providing information on changing determinants, in order to positively change people's intentions and behaviour with regard to the safer use of sunbeds.     

Postmenopausal hormone use and cutaneous melanoma risk: A French prospective cohort study

Cutaneous melanoma has been suspected to be influenced by female hormones. Several studies reported a positive association between menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) use and melanoma risk; however, previous findings were conflicting. We sought to explore the associations between MHT use and melanoma risk in a prospective cohort of women in France, where a particularly wide variety of MHT formulations are available. E3N is a prospective cohort of 98,995 French women aged 40–65 years in 1990. MHT use was assessed through biennial self-administered questionnaires. We used Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for age and skin cancer risk factors. Over 1990–2008, 444 melanoma cases were ascertained among 75,523 postmenopausal women. Ever use of MHT was associated with a higher melanoma risk (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.35, 95% confidence intervals (CI) = 1.07–1.71). The association was strongest among past users (HR = 1.55, CI = 1.17–2.07, homogeneity for past vs. recent use: p = 0.11), and users of MHT containing norpregnane derivatives (HR = 1.59, CI = 1.11–2.27), although with no heterogeneity across types of MHT (p = 0.13). Among MHT users, the association was similar across durations of use. However, a higher risk was observed when treatment onset occurred shortly after menopause (<6 months: HR = 1.55, CI = 1.16–2.07 vs. ≥2 years). Associations between MHT use and melanoma risk were similar after adjustment for UV exposure, although MHT users were more likely to report sunscreen use than nonusers. Our data do not support a strong association between MHT use and melanoma risk. Further investigation is needed to explore potential effect modification by UV exposure on this relationship.     

Non-solar ultraviolet radiation and the risk of basal and squamous cell skin cancer.

A case-control study of non-melanocytic skin cancer was conducted among men in the province of Alberta, Canada. Two hundred and twenty-six cases of basal cell carcinoma (BCC), 180 cases of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and 406 age-matched controls provided information concerning skin pigmentation, occupational history, recreational activity, exposure to sunlight and sources of non-solar ultraviolet radiation (NSUVR) and other potential risk factors. Our analyses show no evidence of elevated risk for BCC or SCC among subjects exposed to various types of NSUVR. This is in opposition to studies of melanoma that have shown elevated risks for exposure to fluorescent lighting, sunlamps and sunbeds.     

Vitamin D and melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer risk and prognosis: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis

Vitamin D is formed mainly in the skin upon exposure to sunlight and can as well be taken orally with food or through supplements. While sun exposure is a known risk factor for skin cancer development, vitamin D exerts anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects on melanocytes and keratinocytes in vitro. To clarify the role of vitamin D in skin carcinogenesis, we performed a review of the literature and meta-analysis to evaluate the association of vitamin D serum levels and dietary intake with cutaneous melanoma (CM) and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) risk and melanoma prognostic factors. Twenty papers were included for an overall 1420 CM and 2317 NMSC. The summary relative risks (SRRs) from random effects models for the association of highest versus lowest vitamin D serum levels was 1.46 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60–3.53) and 1.64 (95% CI 1.02–2.65) for CM and NMSC, respectively. The SRR for the highest versus lowest quintile of vitamin D intake was 0.86 (95% CI 0.63–1.13) for CM and 1.03 (95% CI 0.95–1.13) for NMSC. Data were suggestive of an inverse association between vitamin D blood levels and CM thickness at diagnosis. Further research is needed to investigate the effect of vitamin D on skin cancer risk in populations with different exposure to sunlight and dietary habits, and to evaluate whether vitamin D supplementation is effective in improving CM survival.     

Cutaneous malignant melanoma: facts about sunbeds and sunscreen

The incidence of cutaneous malignant melanoma is still increasing in most light-skinned populations. Sunscreen use has been proposed for the primary prevention of melanoma. However, sunscreen use may increase time spent in the sun when users are willing to acquire a tan or to stay in the sun for a long time, which may increase melanoma risk. When sun exposure is not associated with the desire to acquire a tan or stay in the sun for a long time, sunscreen use may prevent squamous cell skin carcinoma. Sun protection should give priority to clothing and sun exposure reduction. Over the last 20 years, tan acquisition through exposure to artificial sources of ultraviolet radiation has become frequent among fair-skinned adolescents and young adults. There is accumulating evidence that sunbed use is associated with melanoma when started before approximately 30 years of age.     

Cutaneous malignant melanoma: facts about sunbeds and sunscreen

The incidence of cutaneous malignant melanoma is still increasing in most light-skinned populations. Sunscreen use has been proposed for the primary prevention of melanoma. However, sunscreen use may increase time spent in the sun when users are willing to acquire a tan or to stay in the sun for a long time, which may increase melanoma risk. When sun exposure is not associated with the desire to acquire a tan or stay in the sun for a long time, sunscreen use may prevent squamous cell skin carcinoma. Sun protection should give priority to clothing and sun exposure reduction. Over the last 20 years, tan acquisition through exposure to artificial sources of ultraviolet radiation has become frequent among fair-skinned adolescents and young adults. There is accumulating evidence that sunbed use is associated with melanoma when started before approximately 30 years of age.     

Cutaneous malignant melanoma in association with other skin cancers

A case-control study of 232 cases of cutaneous malignant melanoma and 232 matched controls was performed to assess the association of the disease with nonmelanotic skin tumors--basal cell carcinomas, squamous cell carcinomas, and solar keratoses. There was a fourfold increase in risk of melanoma of all types when actinic tumors were present on the face. The risk was not restricted to the lentigo malignant melanoma class as might be expected but was significantly raised for superficial spreading melanoma and nodular melanoma as well (relative risk, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-7.2). This relationship with lesions known to be associated with high-dose solar UV irradiation was supported by quantitative evidence that heavy sun exposure was associated with an increased risk of malignant melanoma.     

Relation between smoking and skin cancer.

PURPOSE: Tobacco smoking is a risk factor for several cancers. The risk of cutaneous malignancies related to smoking, however, is relatively unknown. We investigated the possible association between smoking and skin cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A hospital-based case-control study was performed that included 161 patients with squamous cell carcinoma, 301 with nodular basal cell carcinoma, 153 with superficial multifocal basal cell carcinoma, 125 with malignant melanoma, and 386 controls. Information on smoking history was collected in personal interviews. Relative risks were estimated using exposure odds ratios from cross-tabulation and logistic regression. RESULTS: An association between smoking and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin was found (relative risk, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 3.6; P: = .0001), with a higher risk for current smokers (relative risk, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.9 to 5.5) than for former smokers (relative risk, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 3.0). After adjustment for age, sex, and sun exposure, the relative risk of squamous cell carcinoma was 2.0 (95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 3.2; P: = .008). There was a dose-response relationship with number of cigarettes and pipes smoked. No significant association was found between smoking and nodular basal cell carcinoma, superficial multifocal basal cell carcinoma, or malignant melanoma. CONCLUSION: Tobacco smoking is an independent risk factor for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.     

Risk associations of melanoma in a Southern European population: results of a case/control study

OBJECTIVES: Limited data exist about the risk factors of melanoma in the Greek population. We investigated the association of melanoma with phenotypic and solar indices in this darker skin population residing in an environment of high ambient ultraviolet radiation. METHODS: Our study included 200 sporadic melanoma cases and 200 age-, sex-matched control subjects. Information on history of sun exposure patterns and cutaneous reaction to sunlight was obtained and a clinical evaluation of pigmentary traits, pigmented lesions, and actinic keratoses was performed. RESULTS: In the multivariate analysis, fair skin (OR: 4.63, for fair skin versus light brown, 95% CI: 1.54-13.92), intermittent sun exposure during childhood (OR: 3.33, >2 weeks/year of sun exposure versus /=10 nevi versus no nevi, 95% CI: 1.65-23.76) and the presence of clinically atypical nevi (OR: 2.84, 95% CI: 1.16-6.98), solar lentigenes were an independent risk factor of melanoma (OR: 4.33, 95% CI: 1.67-11.22). CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent sun exposure of moderate intensity during childhood/adolescence and outdoor leisural activities, in conjunction with a more resistant skin phenotype to acute sunburns and a strong association with nevi and solar lentigenes was a prominent determinant of melanoma risk in our population.