Sharing the agenda: pondering the politics and practices of occupational therapy research

AIMS: Occupational therapists espouse a client-centred philosophy of practice, yet little attention has been given to pondering the politics or client-centred practices of occupational therapy research. The aim of this paper is thus to foster reflection on occupational therapy's commitment to client-centredness in the practice of occupational therapy research. MAJOR FINDINGS: Occupational therapy research is not consistently undertaken in a collaborative manner. Power resides in control of the research agenda and participants' priorities can be supplanted by those of researchers. However, examples from the literature and from the authors' research suggest that study participants may wish to influence the research agenda such that their needs and priorities are addressed. PRACTICE CONCLUSION: Client-centred principles appear to require occupational therapists to undertake collaborative research and to ensure that research agendas are informed by clients' priorities. Commitment to client-centred principles demands concerted efforts to identify and address potential barriers to meaningful client participation in the occupation of research. However, it is argued that if researchers and disabled people collaborate, and pool their knowledge and expertise, they may achieve research that is more philosophically compatible with espoused professional values; and that collaborative research may also inform more relevant and useful client-centred clinical practices.     

Client-centred practice in occupational therapy: Critical reflections

Abstract

Aims: The occupational therapy profession has long proclaimed its commitment to a client-centred philosophy of practice and the assumption that occupational therapists consistently practice in a client-centred manner has become central to the profession's self-image and public rhetoric. However, client-centred practice has been subjected to little critical reflection within the occupational therapy profession. The aim of this paper is to foster critical reflection concerning the authenticity and veracity of the profession's commitment to client-centred practices. Major findings: Client-centred practice is defined without evident reference to clients' perspectives. Few occupational therapy researchers have sought clients' perceptions of the client-centred nature of their occupational therapy services. Occupational therapy research is neither consistently undertaken in a collaborative manner, nor are the profession's theories developed through explicit reference to a diversity of clients' perspectives. Professional practices and service evaluations do not consistently seek clients' viewpoints. Client-centred rhetoric is politically expedient and may be a professionalizing strategy employed to increase status and entrench power. Practice conclusion: Although exemplary client-centred occupational therapy practices exist, evidence suggests that the profession does not adhere consistently to its espoused client-centred principle in all its practices. The client-centred practice of occupational therapy should be subjected to assiduous critical reflection.     

Client-centred occupational therapy with children: A critical perspective

Abstract

Background: Client-centredness is a central theme within occupational therapy; however, its application within clinical practice has not been thoroughly examined within the literature. Aim: The aim of this practice reflection is to provide a critical perspective on client-centredness in occupational therapy practice with children. Methods: Two action points of the Canadian Practice Process Framework (CPPF): Set the Stage and Agree on Objectives and Plan are applied to examine the concept of client-centred practice using a common practice example. Results: There are multiple benefits to using a client-centred approach to goal setting and developing a therapy plan. Practical challenges to client-centred practice include a lack of time, organizational support, and professional autonomy. Therapists may exert power over clients by enforcing institutional policies that prioritize the client diagnosis and organizational processes. Conclusion: The authors support a client-centred approach to occupational therapy practice with children but suggest that therapists may feel conflicted in trying to apply these principles within the current context of rehabilitation for children. Occupational therapists are encouraged to identify opportunities where they can advocate for a client-centred approach to services.     

Participatory citizenship: Critical perspectives on client-centred occupational therapy

Abstract

Background/aims: This article aims to discuss client-centred practice, the current dominant approach within occupational therapy, in relation to participatory citizenship. Occupational therapists work within structures and policies that set boundaries on their engagement with clients, while working with complex, multidimensional social realities. Methods: The authors present a critical discussion shaped by their research, including a survey, discussions at workshops at international conferences, and critical engagement with the literature on occupational therapy, occupation, and citizenship. Conclusion: A focus on citizenship suggests reframing professional development based on the participation in public life of people as citizens of their society. While occupational therapists often refer to clients in the context of communities, groups, families, and wider society, the term client-centred practice typically represents a particular view of the individual and may sometimes be too limited in application for a more systemic and societal approach. Significance: The authors question the individual focus which has, until recently, been typical of client-centred occupational therapy. Placing citizenship at the core of intervention is a transformative process that assumes all people are citizens and conceives of health as a collective issue, influencing the way we educate, do research, and practise.     

Client-centred occupational therapy: the importance of critical perspectives

Abstract

Background: The occupational therapy profession has proclaimed itself to be client-centred for over 30 years, but until recently this assertion remained largely unchallenged. Critical thinkers, who have begun to explore client-centred practice in occupational therapy, highlight the necessity for further critical reflection. Aims. This paper aims to define what constitutes “critical” thinking; and to persuade occupational therapists of the importance of employing critical perspectives towards the profession’s assumptions and assertions regarding occupational therapy’s “client-centred” practices. Major findings. Critical thinking is not solely a process of carefully and thoughtfully weighing various arguments or evidence, but of additionally appraising the ideological and structural contexts in which these positions or evidence have arisen. Critical perspectives towards occupational therapy’s client-centred practices identify the ways in which power is exercised by the profession, and culturally specific and disabling ideologies are perpetuated. Practice conclusion. Critical thinking enables occupational therapists to reflect on their own inequitable access to privilege and power, and reduces the potential for the profession to re-inscribe dominant ideologies that devalue disabled people and justify their inequitable opportunities. Because critical thinking demands a readiness to restructure one’s thinking, and decreases the risk of acting on faulty assumptions, it is an essential component of client-centred practice.     

The myth of participation in occupational therapy: reconceptualizing a client-centred approach

Abstract

Participation is often the comprehensive objective of treatment but also an indication of the extent to which the process of occupational therapy is client-centred. The purpose of this study was to explore levels of participation during occupational therapy among clients in the area of mental health from the occupational therapists' perspectives. Additionally the authors sought to identify factors that might hinder client participation. Postal questionnaires were sent out to 670 Swedish occupational therapists working with persons with mental illness and learning disabilities. The questionnaire required therapists to rate clients' levels of participation during occupational therapy. Findings indicated that the most common level of participation for the clients was interdependent, meaning that problems, goals, and plans were identified jointly and collaboratively with the occupational therapist. However, more than 20% of the clients were described as being dependent. Almost 90% of the occupational therapists rated client participation in therapy to be very important and nearly 70% claimed that client participation in general needed to be increased. Occupational therapists rated the primary barriers to participation as being clients' inability to participate and organizational and financial problems. Implications of these findings for education in client-centred practice approaches are discussed.     

Thinking critically about client-centred practice and occupational possibilities across the life-span

Abstract

Background: Client-centred occupational therapy practice is tacitly guided by prevailing social values and beliefs about what are “normal” occupational possibilities. These values and beliefs privilege some occupations and negate others. Aim: This study aims to identify and problematize assumptions regarding the value of approximating normal occupational possibilities, showing how these assumptions influence and may diminish client-centred practice. Methods: Using empirical research examples it demonstrates how occupational therapists and clients are immersed in contexts that shape values and beliefs about what are considered “normal” occupations and how these taken-for-granted values structure occupational therapy practice. Conclusion: Critique of client-centred practice requires conscious reflexivity, interrogating our own and our clients’ predispositions to value some occupations over others. Engaging in critical reflexivity can help therapists develop new perspectives of how client-centred practice can be applied that includes enabling possibilities for occupations that would be missed altogether in the pursuit of “normal’.     

Expanding client-centred thinking to include social determinants: a practical scenario based on the occupation of breastfeeding

Abstract

Background: Client-centred thinking in occupational therapy underemphasizes the influence of social determinants and societal-level factors on occupation across the life course. When client-centred thinking focuses solely on the local or immediate contexts of individuals, therapists may not fully recognize or understand how social determinants can create barriers to occupational participation and performance. Aim/Objectives: This article critically examines gaps in traditional thinking concerning client-centredness and demonstrates how the complex interplay between social determinants and societal-level factors may lead to occupational injustices. Material and methods: A practical example from a recent study on breastfeeding and accompanying scenario is used to examine limitations in current client-centred reasoning. The Life Course Health Development framework, a theoretical framework examining contexts of health disparities, is applied to illustrate the opportunity to expand thinking about client-centredness. Results: The Life Course Health Development framework may be a useful addition to client-centred thinking about social determinants of occupation. Conclusion and significance: Expanding client-centred thinking to include awareness, understanding, and respect for social determinants of occupation may enhance therapist–client interactions and outcomes of the occupational therapy process, and address gaps in current thinking that may contribute to occupational injustices.     

Collaborative Learning Applied to Fieldwork Education

SUMMARY

Occupational therapists of the 21st century must be educated to provide intervention within health, education, community, and policy-making areas. Therapists need to solve complex problems, often in collaboration with numerous stakeholders. This article proposes that preparing occupational therapists for current practice requires a fundamental change in our educational beliefs and that a collaborative approach among students and fieldwork educators is most congruent with the interactive environments of current practice. The philosophical principles of collaborative learning are reviewed and practical considerations to apply the principles to Level II fieldwork programs are described.     

Utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure as an admission and outcome measure in interdisciplinary community-based geriatric rehabilitation

Abstract

In a community-based geriatric rehabilitation project, the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) was used to develop a coordinated, interdisciplinary, and client-centred approach focusing on occupational performance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of the COPM as an admission and outcome measure in an interdisciplinary geriatric rehabilitation context in Denmark. Eighteen occupational and physiotherapists administered the COPM among elderly citizens. Of 185 citizens referred to the study, 152 were admitted to rehabilitation based on health indices, and 124 completed the COPM after their admission, identifying 404 occupational performance issues in all. Post-assessment data were obtained from 95 participants and revealed statistically significant positive change (p < 0.001) in both performance and satisfaction with performance. Furthermore the therapists answered a questionnaire evaluating their experiences, showing that they found development in knowledge and community between the professions to benefit both therapists and citizens, and gained a better insight into their clients' everyday lives through the COPM. In conclusion, the COPM may be useful as an admission and outcome measurement for the rehabilitation of elderly citizens; however, aspects of education and administration must be considered before the instrument can be successfully administered in an interdisciplinary geriatric rehabilitation context.     

Development and construct validation of the Client-Centredness of Goal Setting (C-COGS) scale

Abstract

Background: Client-centred philosophy is integral to occupational therapy practice and client-centred goal planning is considered fundamental to rehabilitation. Evaluation of whether goal-planning practices are client-centred requires an understanding of the client’s perspective about goal-planning processes and practices. The Client-Centredness of Goal Setting (C-COGS) was developed for use by practitioners who seek to be more client-centred and who require a scale to guide and evaluate individually orientated practice, especially with adults with cognitive impairment related to acquired brain injury. Aims: To describe development of the C-COGS scale and examine its construct validity. Material and methods: The C-COGS was administered to 42 participants with acquired brain injury after multidisciplinary goal planning. C-COGS scores were correlated with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) importance scores, and measures of therapeutic alliance, motivation, and global functioning to establish construct validity. Results: The C-COGS scale has three subscales evaluating goal alignment, goal planning participation, and client-centredness of goals. The C-COGS subscale items demonstrated moderately significant correlations with scales measuring similar constructs. Conclusion: Findings provide preliminary evidence to support the construct validity of the C-COGS scale, which is intended to be used to evaluate and reflect on client-centred goal planning in clinical practice, and to highlight factors contributing to best practice rehabilitation.     

Differences and similarities in therapeutic mode use between occupational therapists and occupational therapy students in Norway

Background: The Intentional Relationship Model (IRM) is a new model of the therapeutic relationship in occupational therapy practice. Two previous studies have focused on therapist communication style, or ‘mode’ use, but to date no group comparisons have been reported.

Aim: To explore differences between occupational therapists and occupational therapy students with regard to their therapeutic mode use.

Methods: The study had a cross-sectional design, and convenience samples consisting of occupational therapists (n?=?109) and of second-year occupational therapy students (n?=?96) were recruited. The Self-Assessment of Modes Questionnaire was the main data collection tool. Group differences were analysed with independent t-tests.

Results: The occupational therapists responded more within the collaborative and empathizing modes than the students did. The students responded more within the advocating and instructing modes than the occupational therapists did.

Conclusion and significance: There may be systematic differences between occupational therapists and students concerning their therapeutic mode use. Some modes, such as the collaborating and empathizing modes, may be viewed as requiring more experience, whereas other modes, such as the advocating mode may be related to more recent rehabilitation ideologies. These factors may contribute to explaining several of the group differences observed.     

The illusion of client-centred practice

Abstract

Aim: A critical analysis of occupational therapy practice in the corporate health care culture in a free market economy was undertaken to demonstrate incongruence with the profession’s philosophical basis and espoused commitment to client-centred practice. Findings: The current practice of occupational therapy in the reimbursement-driven practice arena in the United States is incongruent with the profession’s espoused philosophy and values of client-centred practice. Occupational therapy differentiates itself from medicine’s expert model aimed at curing disease and remediating impairment, by its claim to client-centred practice focused on restoring health through occupational enablement. Practice focused on impairment and function is at odds with the profession’s core tenet, occupation, and minimizes the lasting impact of interventions on health and well-being. The profession cannot unleash the therapeutic power of human occupation in settings where body systems and body functions are not occupation-ready at the requisite levels for occupational participation. Conclusion: Client-centred practice is best embodied by occupation-focused interventions in the natural environment of everyday living. Providing services that are impairment-focused in unfamiliar settings is not a good fit for client-centred practice, which is the unique, authentic, and sustainable orientation for the profession.     

A survey on client-centered practice among danish occupational therapists

Background: In Denmark, the cost of healthcare services comprise 12% of the gross domestic product. A recommended method for optimizing effectiveness of and enhance client satisfaction with healthcare is client-centred practice (CCP), a central component of occupational therapy ideology. However, Danish occupational therapists’ perceptions of CCP, including the facilitators and barriers that may contribute to CCP, have never been examined.

Aim: To examine Danish occupational therapists’ perceptions of CCP.

Methods: A survey was conducted using an electronic questionnaire in a small, but representative sample of Danish occupational therapists from all regions and practices.

Results: Three hundred and forty-six occupational therapists (5%) responded. Of these, 98% rated CCP as important, 97% considered their work client-centred, and 92% were satisfied with their level of CCP. Having time to conduct self-directed work, using assessments to identify clients’ priorities, and CCP education, but not fixed regimes, were positively correlated with CCP.

Conclusion: Danish occupational therapists perceive to practice CCP and appear to have adopted the beliefs, theory and ideals of CCP, perhaps influenced by the egalitarian Danish culture. Self-directed work, means to identify and evaluate their clients’ wishes, and education facilitated CCP. Possible absence of occupational therapists not compliant with CCP makes further research warranted.     

The self-reported use of research in clinical practice: A survey of occupational therapists in Sweden

Background: Today, healthcare providers and occupational therapists are increasingly required to rely on evidence-based practices. In both outpatient and inpatient settings, the use of research-based practices can be identified using the Research Utilization Measure questionnaire. Aim: This study explores how occupational therapists in Sweden perceive research utilization. Method: The Research Utilization Measure was sent to 807 randomly selected occupational therapists in Sweden, and the response rate was 59% (n = 472). Results: The majority of respondents (56%, n = 256) reported use of research-based knowledge in their practice “very or rather often”, although 49% (n = 225) of the therapists noted that they “very seldom or never” discussed research findings with their managers. Differences in answers for most items were related to degree of education and length of experience. Occupational therapists with higher education levels more often reported use of research in their clinical practice and therapists with greater experience less often reported use of research in their clinical practice. Conclusion: Education seems to influence the degree to which occupational therapists rely on research to inform their practices. A future challenge for managers and occupational therapists is to create strategic discussions on how to implement treatment that is based on current research.     

Application of the enabling occupation II guidelines in a non-Canadian context

Abstract

Background. The Canadian Enabling Occupation II guidelines contain theory and examples of how to apply client-centredness in occupation-based practice. Little information is available about the feasibility of the guidelines in other contexts. For 18 months, nine Dutch occupational therapists participated in a community of practice to explore, together with three researchers, their experiences with the application of the Enabling Occupation II guidelines. Purpose. To understand the experiences of Dutch occupational therapists with the application of the Enabling Occupation II guidelines. Method. A qualitative study using four focus group discussions and content analysis. Findings. Four themes emerged: (1) an indication that the guidelines of Enabling Occupation II are in line with values and norms of Dutch occupational therapists, (2) the meaningfulness of an intensive process of studying, discussing, applying and reflecting, (3) the struggles faced by the occupational therapists with translating English and getting a grip on concepts and (4) the challenges to implementing the guidelines in practice. Implications. Findings indicate that Enabling Occupation II embody values and norms of Dutch occupational therapists. They experience many benefits in their doing, thinking and being when applying the guidelines in practice. Struggles with reading English, getting a grip on concepts and theories, and difficulties in handling obstacles indicate that the application of the guidelines takes effort. An understanding of the philosophy, application, and reflection on professional identity may be prerequisites for appraising the feasibility of adoption of client-centred guidelines cross-culturally.     

Critical reflexivity in client-centred therapeutic relationships

Abstract

Aim/objectives. This paper explores how a particular form of reflection – critical reflexivity – can support clinicians in developing a more nuanced understanding of therapeutic relationships, and work to advance the goal of client-centred practice. Methods. A critical autobiographical narrative was written, and critical reflexivity adopted, as methods to critically examine the therapeutic relationship. Findings. Critically reflexive stories have the potential to advance client-centred therapeutic relationships by inspiring the (re-)consideration of practices, and by interrogating interpretive systems. Discussion. Understandings and practices that potentially limit the extent to which therapeutic relationships are client centred include (i) Dichotomous thinking, (ii) Objectification, (iii) The economic imperative, and (iv) Knowledge generation. Conclusion. The critical autobiographical account points to ways in which critical reflexivity on the therapeutic relationship has the potential to foster critical questioning, interrogate interpretive systems, attune to subjectivities, contribute to practice-based knowledge, resist violation, foster compassionate practice, and develop new understandings of relevance to client-centred practice. Significance. This critical examination of the therapeutic relationship supports occupational therapists in more fully realizing the profession’s core value of client-centred practice.     

Relevance and focal view point in occupational therapists’ documentation in patient case records

The Code of ethics for occupational therapists stipulates how occupational therapists should think about the profession's central concepts in practice, where “Activity” and “Health” are two such concepts. Other guiding principles for practice are the Occupational Therapy Process Model and the ARTUR Case Record Structure. The aim of this study was to identify and describe how occupational therapists at a hospital in Sweden accomplished documentation of occupational therapy cases in patient case records. A stratified and random sample of one hundred occupational therapy cases was evaluated in relation to a checklist. The results showed that only 21% of the documented occupational therapy cases were complete. Often, the notes were found under the wrong keyword and 12% of the occupational therapy cases were indistinct and did not belong to any of the intervention categories in which occupational therapists normally intervene. Despite this, the majority of the documented occupational therapy cases reflected the ICF's Activity/Participation component. Our conclusion of this study is that even if not all of the occupational therapy cases documented in the patient records included all relevant information, the documentation still reflected a focus on “activity” and holistic health notions.     

A quantitative approach to measure occupational therapist–client interactions: a pilot study

Abstract

Aims: The purpose of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility of a quantitative approach to study occupational therapist–client interactions. Role plays were videotaped in which 10 therapists met three client-actors. A questionnaire assessed the occupational therapists' and the patient-actors' opinion of the role-play experience. A modified version of the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS), OT-RIAS, was used to analyse data. Major findings: Occupational therapists considered the role play experience to be “highly realistic” (mean score 5.4 on a 1–6 Likert scale). The actors' comfort role playing clients was also high (mean = 4.0; range 1–5). Inter-coder reliability for the OT-RIAS was highly significant (r = 0.919; p = 0.000). The modified version of this system fits well in an occupational therapy context. Principal conclusion: The quantitative approach used in this study to explore the therapist–client relationship appears to be effective. The role plays and RIAS may be useful in research exploring correlation between the OT communication style and outcome measures such as client satisfaction or comprehension, or in order to assess and offer feedback in teaching communication skills programmes.