Student views of interprofessional education facilitator competencies: A cross-sectional study

ABSTRACT

Research attention has been paid to providing evidence on undergraduate/pre-licensure health sciences students’ interprofessional education competency requirements, placements, and attainment. Although interprofessional facilitator training has been identified as critical to interprofessional learner outcomes, scant research has examined student perceptions of valued facilitator competencies. This short report investigates students’ views of important attributes for interprofessional facilitation using a cross-sectional observation-survey design. A survey was conducted in a pre-licensure sample of n = 343 students (response rate 68%) from four health professions (nursing, midwifery, physical therapy, and occupational therapy). After completing a semester-long interprofessional education course, students completed a survey vis-à-vis rating the importance of interprofessional facilitator competency with regard to 25 abilities, 12 teacher profiles, and 10 characteristics. Taken together, results indicate the need for a multifaceted view of interprofessional facilitator competencies. Our findings will inform training targeted to specific facilitator competencies, as needed for optimizing the delivery of interprofessional education.     

Flying blind: The experience of online interprofessional facilitation

The role of the facilitator is known to be important in fostering productive interprofessional education (IPE) in the face-to-face (F2F) environment. Online learning can help surmount some of the logistical challenges in IPE by bringing together diverse professionals in multiple geographical locations. Best practices in F2F IPE facilitation are beginning to emerge, but there is scant literature examining IPE facilitation online. What little research exists has focused on the asynchronous environment and suggests that the skill sets of online and F2F facilitators have considerable overlap, but there are further demands in the online setting. This qualitative study sought to examine online synchronous IPE facilitation through the self-reported experiences of seven trained facilitators during a 12-week online course. Data collected through focus groups and targeted interviews were analyzed by the research team using constant comparison techniques. Four major themes were revealed: technology as a dynamic force, reduction in non-verbal cues, evolution of the online IPE group process over time and the importance of co-facilitation. The foundations of IPE facilitation were seen to carry over to the online setting. This study has implications for the training of IPE facilitators and for the design of online IPE learning experiences.     

Exploring the nature of facilitating interprofessional learning: findings from an exploratory study

Abstract

With the growing complexity in managing multiple disease and illness-related problems, increased attention is being paid to the importance of interprofessional education (IPE) in preparing students for working collaboratively with different professionals. Educational activities for mixed groups of health professional students are increasing, and facilitation of learning in interprofessional student groups is now acknowledged as an essential part of successful interprofessional learning activities. However, little is known about the strategies used by facilitators with students from different professions, and how they promote learning. Using data obtained through an analysis of videos taken as part of a large study of IPE and interprofessional practice, this study aimed to identify the pedagogical strategies and behaviours of facilitators participating in seven different learning activities with health care students from five different professions. The data captured student reactions and behaviours and provided insight into the dynamics of the interprofessional encounters. The findings showed that facilitating groups involved a complex interchange of three types of interaction between facilitators and students: facilitator-controlled interaction, facilitator-driven interaction and student-driven interactions. The findings also suggest that faculty development programs should assist facilitators to re-examine teaching approaches and encourage students to assume the responsibility for discussing issues and collaborating with others in all their interprofessional contacts. Continuity and stability in faculty development activities will better prepare clinical educators and young professionals to become interprofessional champions.     

Exploring the Doctor of Nursing Practice project facilitator/mentor role

BackgroundThe Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) facilitator/mentor is a collaborative member of the project team, yet little has been reported about this role. This qualitative study explored the experiences of DNP project facilitators.MethodsFocus groups were conducted using a purposeful sample of project facilitators. Focus group questions were developed using Gitlin, Lyons, and Kolodner's five-stage model of collaboration. Data were transcribed and content analyzed using Kruger and Casey methods.ResultsThree focus groups included 21 facilitators who were affiliated with an academic health system. Six themes emerged: (a) exploring student interest, (b) establishing a collaborative fit, (c) connecting with key stakeholders, (d) overcoming barriers, (e) role clarity, and (f) interaction.ConclusionDNP project facilitators have an important role not only in students’ formation, but also in contributing to the academic–practice partnership. The importance of the facilitator role as the student progresses through their DNP project cannot be overstated.     

The team builder: the role of nurses facilitating interprofessional student teams at a Swedish clinical training ward

Interprofessional education (IPE) is an educational strategy attracting increased interest as a method to train future health care professionals. One example of IPE is the clinical training ward, where students from different health care professions practice together. At these wards the students work in teams with the support of facilitators. The professional composition of the team of facilitators usually corresponds to that of the students. However, previous studies have revealed that nurse facilitators are often in the majority, responsible for student nurses' profession specific facilitation as well as interprofessional team orientated facilitation. The objective of this study was to describe how nurses act when facilitating interprofessional student teams at a clinical training ward. The research design was ethnography and data were collected through participant observations and interviews. The analysis revealed the four strategies used when facilitating teams of interprofessional students to enhance collaborative work and professional understanding. The nurse facilitator as a team builder is a new and exciting role for nurses taking on the responsibility of facilitating interprofessional student teams. Future research needs to explore how facilitating nurses balance profession specific and team oriented facilitating within the environment of an interprofessional learning context.     

Perspectives and experiences of nurses as facilitators within a Practice Development program

Background

Health services are challenged to change and adapt to meet the changing needs of the populations they serve. To support this, the ‘Essentials of Care’ Practice Development program was developed in Australia. Local facilitators play a key role in its delivery and achievements.

Macmillan nurse facilitators for palliative care: evaluation of a pilot project

AIM: to describe and evaluate the implementation of two Macmillan nurse facilitator posts. METHOD: a case study design was adopted with data collection in two main phases. A range of data collection techniques were used, including interview, questionnaire and observation. Various sampling strategies were adopted for the different data collection methods. The use of multiple sources of data supported the triangulation of evidence in order to increase the strength and rigour of the analysis. FINDINGS: two Macmillan nurse facilitator posts were set up with the overall aims of enhancing the quality of palliative care to patients in the community by mobilising the existing skills and supporting the development of new competencies by community nurses. The Macmillan nurse facilitators have been active in three areas directly linked to community nurses' clinical practice: educational programmes, establishment of a palliative resource nurse network and support of clinical guidelines in nursing and primary care teams. The model of peer facilitation whereby the Macmillan nurse facilitators continue to work as district nurses for part of the week has been highly valued by community nurses. CONCLUSIONS: the single most important factor identified in facilitating successful implementation of these posts has been the 'dual role' nature of the posts. This has been key to acceptance of the posts by a generic workforce. The posts provide an effective model for supporting and enhancing the palliative clinical skills and knowledge of generic community-based staff.     

Clinical facilitators: a new way of working

AIM: To improve the quality and quantity of student clinical placements in an NHS trust. METHOD: When nurse training was under review, a 12-month pilot study was undertaken to introduce 12 clinical facilitators to acute and surgical wards at six trust sites on a supernumerary basis. As well as guiding the student, each facilitator liaised with a link tutor and ward staff, thereby maintaining continuity. The project team worked closely with the trust audit department and collected data using a variety of methods. The project leader developed an audit questionnaire for students, ward staff and college tutors. The initial answers were used as a baseline, then the same questionnaire was redistributed so the data could be analysed and compared. RESULTS: Most of the students felt more supported and confident to practise. The clinical facilitators were able to help ground the tutors' practice knowledge in reality, and the tutors built up the clinical facilitators' confidence in curricular issues and skills, such as presentation and teaching strategies. CONCLUSION: The clinical facilitator can strengthen partnerships between education and service and offer a model for practical facilitation.     

Consensus group session of experts to describe interprofessional collaboration processes in team meetings

Abstract

Linking the outcomes from interprofessional education to improvements in patient care has been hampered by educational assessments that primarily measure the short-term benefits of specific curricular interventions. Competencies, recently published by the Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC), elaborate overarching goals for interprofessional education by specifying desired outcomes for graduating health professions students. The competencies define a transition point between the prescribed and structured educational experience of a professional degree program and the more self-directed, patient-oriented learning associated with professional practice. Drawing on the IPEC competencies for validity, we created a 42-item questionnaire to assess outcomes related to collaborative practice at the degree program level. To establish the usability and psychometric properties of the questionnaire, it was administered to all the students on a health science campus at a large urban university in the mid-Atlantic of the United States. The student responses (n?=?481) defined four components aligned in part with the four domains of the IPEC competencies. In addition, the results demonstrated differences in scores by domain that can be used to structure future curricula. These findings suggest a questionnaire based on the IPEC competencies might provide a measure to assess programmatic outcomes related to interprofessional education. We discuss directions for future research, such as a comparison of results within and between institutions, and how these results could provide valuable insights about the effect of different curricular approaches to interprofessional education and the success of various educational programs at preparing students for collaborative practice.     

Implementation and evaluation of a community-based interprofessional learning activity

Implementation of large-scale, meaningful interprofessional learning activities for pre-licensure students has significant barriers and requires novel approaches to ensure success. To accomplish this goal, faculty at Case Western Reserve University, Ohio, USA, used the Ottawa Model of Research Use (OMRU) framework to create, improve, and sustain a community-based interprofessional learning activity for large numbers of medical students (N = 177) and nursing students (N = 154). The model guided the process and included identification of context-specific barriers and facilitators, continual monitoring and improvement using data, and evaluation of student learning outcomes as well as programme outcomes. First year Case Western Reserve University medical students and undergraduate nursing students participated in team-structured prevention screening clinics in the Cleveland Metropolitan Public School District. Identification of barriers and facilitators assisted with overcoming logistic and scheduling issues, large class size, differing ages and skill levels of students and creating sustainability. Continual monitoring led to three distinct phases of improvement and resulted in the creation of an authentic team structure, role clarification, and relevance for students. Evaluation of student learning included both qualitative and quantitative methods, resulting in statistically significant findings and qualitative themes of learner outcomes. The OMRU implementation model provided a useful framework for successful implementation resulting in a sustainable interprofessional learning activity.     

Identifying facilitators and barriers for implementation of interprofessional education: Perspectives from medical educators in the Netherlands

ABSTRACT

Patient care and patient safety can be compromised by the lack of interprofessional collaboration and communication between healthcare providers. Interprofessional education (IPE) should therefore start during medical training and not be postponed until after graduation. This case study explored the current situation in the Dutch context and interviewed experts within medical education and with pioneers of successful best practices to learn more about their experiences with IPE. Data analysis started while new data were still collected, resulting in an iterative, constant comparative process. Using a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis framework, we identified barriers and facilitators such as lack of a collective professional language, insufficient time or budget, stakeholders’ resistance, and hierarchy. Opportunities and strengths identified were developing a collective vision, more attention for patient safety, and commitment of teachers. The facilitators and barriers relate to the organisational level of IPE and the educational content and practice. In particular, communication, cohesiveness, and support are influenced by these facilitators. An adequate identification of the SWOT elements in the current situation could prove beneficial for a successful implementation of IPE within the healthcare educational system.     

Feasibility of supporting newly qualified nurses: Nominal group technique of the perspectives of nursing stakeholders

BackgroundAs the health industry grows, integration of newly qualified nurses into the workplace is critical to workforce sustainability. In one health service, a work-based student learning program, the Collaborative Clusters Education Model, was extended to support newly qualified nurses in their transition to the workplace.AimTo describe the feasibility of the Collaborative Clusters Education Model to support newly qualified nurses.DesignEvaluative methodology using Nominal Group Technique.MethodsConvenience and snowball sampling were used to recruit participants from three stakeholder groups: clinical nurse facilitators (two groups: n1 = 7; n2 = 5), nurse leaders (n = 9) and practice partners, registered nurses who support with newly qualified nurses (n = 5). Groups provided nominal rankings of ideas (quantitative data) and group discussions were recorded and professionally transcribed (qualitative data). Data analysis involved three stages: i) quantitative analysis; ii) qualitative analysis and iii) synthesising qualitative and quantitative data to create meaning.ResultsThe priorities focused broadly on the challenges associated with individual and organisational capacity to support newly qualified nurses. In addition to capacity, clinical facilitator capability, teamwork and communication, and role ambiguity were identified as key issues.ConclusionsThe feasibility of supporting newly qualified nurses via the Collaborative Clusters Education Model would be enhanced with improved alignment between stakeholder roles and responsibilities. In contemporary workplaces, characterised by distributed responsibility for learning support, there is a need for increased role clarity across the stakeholder team. Furthermore, the need for improved access to experienced mentors points to the potential of team-based models of nursing care delivery.     

Neophyte facilitator experiences of interprofessional education: implications for faculty development

The facilitation of learners from different professional groups requires a range of interprofessional knowledge and skills (e.g. an understanding of possible sources of tension between professions) in addition to those that are more generic, such as how to manage a small group of learners. The development and delivery of interprofessional education (IPE) programs tends to rely on a small cohort of facilitators who have typically gained expertise through ‘hands-on’ involvement in facilitating IPE and through mentorship from more experienced colleagues. To avoid burn-out and to meet a growing demand for IPE, a larger number of facilitators are needed. However, empirical evidence regarding effective approaches to prepare for this type of work is limited. This article draws on data from a multiple case study of four IPE programs based in an urban setting in North America with a sample of neophyte facilitators and provides insight into their perceptions and experiences in preparing for and delivering IPE. Forty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted before (n == 20) and after (n == 21) program delivery with 21 facilitators. Findings indicated that despite participating in a three-fold faculty development strategy designed to support them in their IPE facilitation work, many felt unprepared and continued to have a poor conceptual understanding of core IPE and interprofessional collaboration principles, resulting in problematic implications (e.g. ‘missed teachable moments’) within their IPE programs. Findings from this study are discussed in relation to the IPE, faculty development and wider educational literature before implications are offered for the future delivery of interprofessional faculty development activities.     

Fluctuations in the emotional intelligence of therapy students during clinical placements: Implication for educators,supervisors, and students

This study investigated the changes in emotional intelligence (EI) of occupational therapy, physiotherapy, and speech pathology students (therapy students). Clinical placements have multiple benefits including the development of interprofessional skills, enhancing practice skills and interpersonal skills. Higher EI competencies have been shown to have a positive impact on patient outcomes, teamwork skills, dealing with stress, and patient satisfaction. Data for this study were collected at two time points: before third-year therapy students commenced extended clinical placements (T1 with 261 students) and approximately 7 months later after students had completed one or more clinical placements (T2 with 109 students). EI was measured using the Emotional Quotient Inventory 2.0 (EQ-i^2.0). Only one EI score, assertiveness, demonstrated a significant decline. No EI score showed a significant increase. A third or more of the students showed increases of five points or more in self-actualisation, emotional expression, independence, reality testing and optimism. However, of concern were the five EI scores where therapy students’ EI scores decreased by more than five points: assertiveness (where 38% of students declined), problem solving (37%), impulse control (35%), self-actualisation (35%), and stress tolerance (33%). With EI scores declining for some students during clinical placements, there are implications for clinical supervisors and interprofessional facilitators as clinical performance may decline concurrently. There is a range of potential reasons that clinical placements could negatively influence the EI competencies of a therapy student, including poor clinical supervision, conflict between a student, and supervisor and failing a clinical placement. The research suggests that interprofessional facilitators and university educators might consider students undertaking EI tests before clinical placements.     

The impact of international experience on student nurses' personal and professional development

Background: Many student nurses undertake international clinical experience during their education programmes, which raises the question ‘How do these experiences impact on students nurses’ personal and professional development?’ Method: A case study was conducted in one School of Nursing in the United Kingdom. Student nurses participating in a new module, International Nursing and Health Care, which included clinical experience overseas, gave qualitative accounts of their international experiences and subsequent learning. Their accounts were also compared with the perceptions and expectations of the module facilitators. Findings: While there were some similarities in student experience and facilitator expectations, there were also notable differences. The students believed that their international experiences had a deep impact on their personal development, helping them make the transition from student to qualified nurse. The case study raised further questions about the acquisition of cultural knowledge and the facilitation and provision of learning from experience.     

Interprofessional immersion: Use of interprofessional education collaborative competencies in side-by-side training of family medicine,pharmacy, nursing,and counselling psychology trainees

While supported by the Affordable Care Act, in the United States, interprofessional training often takes place after healthcare providers graduate and are practicing in the field. This article describes the implementation and evaluation of an interprofessional training for graduate-level healthcare trainees. A group of interprofessional healthcare faculty provided a weeklong interprofessional immersion for doctoral-level healthcare trainees (n = 24) in Pharmacy, Counselling Psychology, Nursing, and Family Medicine residents. Healthcare faculty and staff from each profession worked side-by-side to provide integrated training utilising the Interprofessional Education Collaborative core competency domains. Trainees were placed into small teams with representatives from each profession; each team observed, learned, and practiced working within teams to provide quality patient care. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected to identify the effect of the training on trainees’ self-reported team skills, as well as the extent to which the trainees learned and utilised the competencies. The results suggest that after completing the training, trainees felt more confident in their ability to work within an interprofessional team and more likely to utilise a team-based approach in the future.