Modified transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Double-incision,triple-port access

Abstract

Transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been increasingly performed in recent years, using special access devices and instruments through one incision in the umbilicus. We have modified the technique by using a two-incision triple-port access approach and conventional laparoscopic instruments. A total of 52 patients accepted the modified transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and all the procedures were completed successfully. The operative time was 150 minutes for the first case, 100 minutes and 90 minutes for the second and third cases, and an average of 50 ± 14 minutes for the following 49 cases. All patients were discharged on post-operative day 3. No complications were observed during a follow-up of at least three months. The umbilical incisions were nearly invisible, and all patients were satisfied with the abdominal cosmetic results.In conclusion, transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a double-incision triple-port access approach and conventional laparoscopic instruments as described in this study is safe and feasible, and it reduces the conflict of instruments without using special devices.     

经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术20例的护理体会

目的探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的护理方法。方法报告20例经脐单孔腹腔胆囊切除的资料,对相关的护理方法和体会进行总结。结果20例手术均获成功,无1例中转腹腔镜或开放式手术,术后伤口愈合良好,无并发症发生,脐部无明显手术疤痕,美容效果良好。结论经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术是新开展的微创手术,虽然手术操作难度大,但具有无疤痕,护理方法简单,明显减少术后并发症等优点,具有良好的临床应用前景。     

经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊炎的临床观察

目的 探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊炎的疗效.方法 对本院2003年3月至2010年9月收治的胆囊炎患者204例,均分为实验组和对照组,实验组采用经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术进行治疗,对照组采用常规腹腔镜手术治疗,对两组患者治疗效果(胆管和肠管损伤、手术时间、麻醉时间、术后住院时间和再手术率)和并发症等相关因素进行统计学分析.结果 实验组患者在肠胆管损伤、出血量、抗生素应用时间、术后排气时间、进食时间和住院时间方面明显优于对照组(P<0.05).结论 对胆囊炎患者采用经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术是安全可靠的,但在手术中要正确处理患者胆囊三角的结构,在术中对患者进行胆管造影,并对不适宜经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术手术的患者进行开腹手术以降低患者出现并发症的机会.     

Single‐port endo‐laparoscopic surgery in combined abdominal procedures

Single‐port endo‐laparoscopic surgery has gained support in the surgical community because it is perceived to offer a better postoperative outcome as it requires only a single incision. We write this prospective observational study to ascertain the feasibility and safety of this technique in patients otherwise requiring two operations. Five patients who underwent double procedures with a single‐port device were reviewed: Case 1, a transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair and gastric wedge resection; Case 2, cholecystectomy and diaphragmatic hernia repair; Case 3, oophorectomy and incisional hernia repair; Case 4, anterior resection of the rectum and hepatic segmentectomy; and Case 5, left adrenalectomy and cholecystectomy. Patient demographics, type of port used, operative time, complications and incision length were collected. Mean operative time for the cases ranged from 100 to 315 min. Incision length for the single‐port device was 2 cm. In Case 2, an additional 5‐mm port was used and an intraoperative complication involving a laceration of the liver occurred during the suturing of the gallbladder fundus. An additional 8‐cm lower abdominal incision (Pfannenstiel) was required in Case 4 to complete the colonic anastomosis and for specimen retrieval. Single‐port endo‐laparoscopic surgery is a feasible and safe technique for approaching double procedures. It drastically reduces the number of scars that a double procedure creates, and if difficulty arises, another port can always be added to ease the operation. It can also potentially reduce the number of admissions and anesthesia that a patient undergoes.     

Single‐port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A comparative study in 106 initial cases

Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been the standard of care for gallbladder diseases since the late 1980s. Many surgeons have rapidly adopted single‐port laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder pathologies. The aim of the present study was to analyze the clinical outcome in initial single‐port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: Data from 106 consecutive single‐port laparoscopic cholecystectomies between May 2008 and April 2009 were analyzed retrospectively. We divided the patients into two groups – an early group (group I, n=56) and a late group (group II, n=50) – to compare clinical outcomes. During each procedure, only one longitudinal transumbilical incision, 1.5 to 2.0 cm in length, was made to access the abdominal cavity. A multichannel port system was assembled with existing devices. Standard laparoscopic instruments were used to perform each cholecystectomy. Results: Patient demographics did not differ between the two groups. Of the eight cases that were converted to conventional laparoscopic surgery, seven were part of group I (P=0.063). Mean operation time for single‐port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was significantly shorter in group II (58.2 versus 71.6 min, P=0.004). There were two operative complications in group I, which were successfully managed with laparoscopic surgery. There was no statistical difference in occurrence of operative complication and hospital stay between the two groups. Conclusion: Single‐port laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely performed for various gallbladder lesions in selected cases, and the operation time improved with accumulation of cases.     

运用X-cone单孔器械行经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术

目的:探讨运用X-cone单孔器械完全经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的方法和可行性.方法:回顾性分析我院2011年4月至2011年11月期间54例经脐单孔胆囊切除患者的临床资料.结果:本组54例均运用X-cone单孔腹腔镜器械经脐行单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术,2例因胆囊炎症严重,解剖不清,改为二孔法腹腔镜手术,其他均手术成功,成功率96.3％.本组病例手术时间平均(30±14) (20 ～ 58) min,出血5 ～50 mL,平均10.6 mL.术后次日恢复流汁饮食,住院时间3～4 d.随访至今,1例患者切口液化,无其他术中、术后并发症.术后患者无瘢痕效果十分满意.结论:运用X-cone单孔腹腔镜器械经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术具有同样的手术安全性,更具有突出的切口美容效果,术后疼痛轻、康复快、住院时间短,同时患者住院费用低,值得在临床广泛推广.     

经脐单孔腹腔镜治疗精索静脉曲张的疗效观察

【目的】探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜治疗精索静脉曲张的可行性和安全性。【方法】选择2013年1~12月本院收治的16例精索静脉曲张的患者,应用经脐单孔腹腔镜技术行精索静脉高位结扎术。观察患者手术时间、住院时间、术后并发症、复发等临床指标。【结果】16例均顺利完成手术,单侧手术时间平均25 min,平均住院时间为3.5 d。术后随访显示患者症状明显改善,无阴囊水肿、睾丸萎缩等并发症发生,未见复发患者。【结论】经脐单孔腹腔镜精索静脉高位结扎术具有良好的临床可行性和安全性,值得临床推广使用。     

经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术31例体会

目的:探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全性和可行性。方法:回顾分析2010年5月~2011年5月上饶肿瘤医院31例经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床资料。结果:28例成功行经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术,平均时间43min;3例因暴露困难中转4孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术;1例术后3d出现胆囊窝积液,行B超引导下腹腔穿刺引流术治愈。术后随访2周~1年,无手术相关并发症,脐部切口隐藏脐凹,无可视瘢痕。结论:术前术中严格掌握适应证,由经验丰富的腹腔镜医师开展,经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术具有微创、美观等优点,安全可行,疗效确切。     

经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术临床分析

目的探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除的可行性、安全性及实用性。方法回顾分析2010年11月-2011年2月27例行经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的临床资料。其中男15例,女12例;年龄19～53岁,平均39.5岁。胆囊息肉样病变12例,病程6个月～8年;胆囊结石17例,结石数量1～9个,大小0.5～1.5 cm,均为非急性期患者,病程1个月～13年。结果 27例手术均顺利完成,无1例中转开腹或转为传统三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术,术中生命体征平稳。手术时间35～149 min,平均63 min;术中出血10～20 mL,平均15 mL。所有患者术后2～3 d出院。患者均获随访,随访时间6～24个月,平均13个月。术中及术后随访期间未发生任何并发症。脐部瘢痕不明显,患者满意度高。结论经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除安全可行,具有创伤小、瘢痕不明显等优点。     

经脐入路腹腔镜胆囊切除术35例报告

目的 探讨经脐入路腹腔镜胆囊切除术的可行性及应用价值.方法 回顾分析35例(胆囊结石28例,胆囊息肉7例)经脐入路腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床资料.结果 手术时间28~62 min,平均40 min;术中出血3~16 mL,平均7 mL.未放引流,无出血、胆漏等并发症.术后随访1～18个月,平均6个月,患者均无腹痛、发热、黄疸及脐疝发生,脐部瘢痕隐蔽.结论 经脐入路腹腔镜胆囊切除术是安全可行的,操作难度较常规腹腔镜胆囊切除术大,但通过熟练的操作、器械的改进,与常规腹腔镜胆囊切除术手术时间无明显差别,更具微创性,美容效果更佳,值得临床推广应用.     

经脐单孔与三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术疗效对比

【摘要】目的：探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术 ( transumbilical single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy， TUSPLC) 的手术可行性和经验体会。方法：回顾性分析我院2020 年3月～2021年11月开展TUSPLC 51例患者及三孔法LC 51例患者的临床资料。结果：TUSPLC组手术时间显著长于三孔法LC组[(49.4±13.3)min Vs (31.2±11.51)min]，TUSPLC组增加戳孔的例数显著多于三孔法LC组[(5（9.8%)]Vs [1(1.96%))]，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）；但TUSPLC组较三孔法LC组，术后止痛剂使用例数更少[4（7.85%）Vs[17(33.3%)]，术后腹壁疤痕满意度评分更高[(3.88±0.11)分 Vs (2.75±0.31)分]，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）；TUSPLC组的手术出血量、术后并发症及住院天数与三孔法LC组比较没有差异（P>0.05）。 结论：TUSPLC在有丰富的二孔LC经验的基础上是安全可行的，也是现阶段最能体现NOTES理念的手术，选择合适的患者可做推广。     

经脐入路腹腔镜胆囊切除术临床研究

目的：探讨经脐入路行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的可行性。方法：对6例患者采用仅在脐部切开一个切口进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术。结果：6例患者手术均获成功,无中转常规腹腔镜手术或开腹手术。手术时间80～130min,无出血、胆管损伤等并发症发生。术后1d出院,术后1月门诊随访,患者恢复顺利,除脐部外,腹壁无手术瘢痕。结论：经脐入路腹腔镜胆囊切除术技术上是可行的,但难度较大,在开展手术初期应慎重选择病例。     

悬吊式经脐入路腹腔镜妇科手术的临床探讨

目的探讨悬吊式经脐入路腹腔镜妇科手术的可行性和临床价值。方法回顾分析悬吊式经脐入路腹腔镜手术在2例宫外孕、3例卵巢囊肿、2例子宫肌瘤中应用的临床资料。结果 7例顺利完成手术。2例宫外孕手术时间平均为30min,出血量平均10mL;3例卵巢囊肿手术时间平均为55min,出血量平均30mL;2例子宫肌瘤手术时间平均为80min,出血量平均100mL。标本从脐部或阴道取出。7例手术均未放置引流,术后无出血、临近脏器损伤、尿潴留及背部疼痛,腹部疼痛轻,未用镇痛药物,腹壁无明显切口瘢痕。恢复快,宫外孕和卵巢囊肿患者术后24h后即可下床小便,3d出院;子宫肌瘤患者术后36h后下床小便,5d出院。结论悬吊式经脐入路腹腔镜妇科手术安全可行,具微创美容优势,与现代女性患者需求吻合,值得临床推广应用。     

Remote access laparoscopic (REAL) surgery: a novel approach for single-port surgery without a visible scar

INTRODUCTION: Single-port laparoscopic surgery usually uses the transumbilical approach. However, the transumbilical incision may be associated with a high frequency of wound-related complications, including trocar site hernia and infection. Therefore, we developed remote access laparoscopic (REAL) surgery, a new access technique for single-port surgery within the pubic hairline. This study reports on a technique developed at our institution and describes our preliminary results. MATERIALS AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Ten patients with cholecystolithiasis underwent REAL surgery. A single 2.5-cm transverse incision was made medially within the pubic hairline area, and a SILS Port was inserted. A 5-mm flexible endoscope and an articulating grasper or a long laparoscopic grasper were used. Dissection of the gallbladder was achieved with laparoscopic ultrasonic shears just as in the conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. All procedures were successfully performed without conversion to conventional laparoscopic technique. There were no postoperative complications, and outpatient evaluation showed a clean scar within the pubic hair area in all patients. DISCUSSION: Our early experience shows that REAL surgery is feasible and safe. This novel access technique can preserve the native umbilicus and provides an invisible scar that is concealed within the pubic hair.     

Ovarian cystectomy for a dermoid cyst with the new single-port robotic system

We report a 27 year-old patient with a dermoid cyst who underwent robotic single port transumbilical ovarian cystectomy. She was operated through a 2 cm long single midline umbilical incision using a new platform from Intuitive Surgical. The operative time was 45 minutes and the docking time was 15 minutes. Ovarian cystectomy using the da Vinci single-port system is feasible and effective. This new semi-rigid robotic surgery platform may increase access to the potential advantages of single-site surgery. Robotic systems designed specifically for single port approach have the potential of alleviating several of the limitations associated with traditional laparoscopic single-site surgery.     

改良经脐“单孔”腹腔镜胆囊切除术

目的探讨改良的经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床可行性。方法回顾性分析2009年2月-2012年4月75例患者行改良经脐单孔腹腔镜手术的临床资料。其中39例胆囊结石,20例胆囊息肉,急性胆囊炎14例,急性胆囊炎伴穿孔2例。结果73例手术均成功完成,2例转为传统三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术后顺利完成手术,无中转开腹。平均手术时间为54．4min（23～120min）。术中出血量5～30mL,平均（14．9±5．10）mL。术后疼痛轻,恢复快,3d后出院。随访1～10个月,未出现出血、漏胆、胆管损伤、消化道损伤、切口疝等并发症。且瘢痕隐蔽,不易发现。结论改良后的经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术安全可行,具有微创、经济、恢复快等优点,具有推广价值。     

上腹部微瘢痕腹腔镜胆囊切除术

目的 介绍一种在上腹部无手术瘢痕的腹腔镜胆囊切除新术式.方法沿脐左右缘各做一个10mm的弧形切口,各穿刺10mm trocar,分别供操作器械和腹腔镜进出,另在右下腹置入直径5mm加长抓钳用于牵引,用普通腹腔镜器械和电凝钩完成胆囊切除,最后从脐部取出胆囊.结果 共用此法手术32例,平均手术时间50min(30~70min),无中转开腹.其中2例因粘连严重转常规三孔法手术,无出血、胆漏等并发症.术后平均住院时间4d(2~5d).随访4个月~1.5年,右下腹戳孔愈合良好,脐部看不出手术瘢痕.结论 经脐及右下腹入路胆囊切除是可行的,可达到上腹部无手术瘢痕的目的,并且手术难度明显小于经脐三孔法胆囊切除术,值得基层医院推广.     

经脐单孔腹腔镜精索静脉高位结扎术的手术配合及效果

目的探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜精索静脉高位结扎术的手术配合方法及效果。方法20例双侧精索静脉曲张患者随机分为经脐单孔腹腔镜精索静脉高位结扎术组和传统腹腔镜手术组,每组10例,对比2组的手术时间、术野情况及手术并发症等。结果20例手术均获成功、无明显并发症。传统腹腔镜手术时间、手术术野等优于单孔腹腔镜手术。结论经脐单孔腹腔镜精索静脉高位结扎术是安全可行的,操作难度较常规腹腔镜精索静脉高位结扎术复杂、手术时间长,但手术伤口小,术后瘢痕隐蔽。     

Novel procedure, SILSOID colectomy, is a bridge between conventional and single-incisional laparoscopic colectomy

Introduction: Laparoscopic colectomy (LC) is a widely accepted treatment for various diseases of the colon. Transumbilical single‐incisional laparoscopic surgery (SILS) offers excellent cosmetic results compared with standard multi‐port laparoscopic surgery. We describe a new hybrid laparoscopic procedure, SILSOID colectomy, which combines conventional LC with SILS. Methods: We performed SILSOID colectomy to treat four patients with colorectal disease. Three ports were inserted through the single transumbilical incision, and an additional port was inserted in the flank at a site that depended on the location of the lesion. Division and anastomosis of the colon were performed extracorporeally. Results: SILSOID colectomy was carried out uneventfully in all four cases. The median operation time was 220 minutes (range, 179–320 min), and the median blood loss was negligible (range, negligible–285 mL), respectively. Although one patient experienced a postoperative wound infection, no other postoperative complications occurred. Conclusion: SILSOID colectomy is safe and feasible and it can be used as an alternative to conventional LC. We consider this procedure to be a bridge between conventional LC and more advanced laparoscopic procedures, such as SILS.     

Enlargement of umbilical incision in standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy is frequently necessary: An argument for the single incision approach?

Objective: Cosmetic result after cholecystectomy is up for debate. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and extent of enlargement of initial skin and fascia incision in standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy and to detect predictive factors for such an enlargement. Material and methods: The size of the umbilical incision was measured before and after standard laparoscopic gallbladder removal in 391 patients from August 2009 to October 2012. Predisposing factors for the need of enlargement of the umbilical incision were analysed. Results: Additional enlargement of the umbilical incision for gallbladder removal was required in 35.8% of the patients at skin level, and in 40.4% at fascia level. The median enlargement of the umbilical skin incision was 11 mm, from 25 mm to 36 mm. Gallbladder weight, total stone weight, maximum diameter of largest stone and shorter initial length of incision were independent predisposing factors for enlargement of the incision. Conclusions: In standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy the umbilical incision frequently requires secondary enlargement, especially if a large stone mass is involved. Therefore, the cosmetic result after laparoscopic cholecystectomy depends on more than only the technique used for access and the surgical technique for cholecystectomy should be chosen individually for each patient according to the stone mass.