Comparing practice in the United States and the United Kingdom

By comparing the experience of two countries at different stages in their development of case management systems, the author shows that some practices simply work better than others no matter where they are carried out.     

A comparison of insulin pen use in the United States and the United Kingdom

Insulin pens offer the advantages of simplicity, convenience, and more accurate dosing to insulin-using patients with diabetes. The usefulness of insulin pens is not limited to certain subsets of individuals but extends to all patients who might choose this delivery system. By facilitating acceptance and consistent implementation of multiple-dose insulin regimens, pens hold the potential to promote improved blood glucose control and thus reduce the risk of the chronic complications of diabetes. Both clinical experience and the supporting literature suggest that pen delivery systems are an option that should be routinely offered to all insulin users.     

Drug regulation in the United States and the United Kingdom: the Depo-Provera story

In 1984, both the United Kingdom and the United States received recommendations from panels of experts specifically convened to consider the merits of Depo-Provera (depot medroxyprogesterone acetate [DMPA]) as a long-term contraceptive agent. This study compares the final reports written by these panels. We explore why, despite access to essentially the same data, the U.K. panel recommended marketing approval but the U.S. Public Board of Inquiry did not. We conclude that differing national policies helped shape the interpretation of the data and thus the divergent outcomes.     

The health care costs of diabetic nephropathy in the United States and the United Kingdom

PROBLEM: Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a common microvascular complication of diabetes and can result in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) necessitating long-term dialysis or kidney transplantation. The costs of these complications are relatively high. The aim of this study was to quantify and compare the rates and annual costs of DN in the USA and the UK. METHODS: A cost of illness model was used to estimate the numbers of people with DN (microalbuminuria, overt nephropathy, and ESRD) or a previous kidney transplant at a given point in time and the numbers of new kidney transplants during a year. All costs were estimated in 2001 currencies. A sensitivity analysis assessed the robustness of the national annual cost estimates. RESULTS: In the USA, the total annual medical costs incurred by all payers in managing DN were US dollars 1.9 billion for Type 1 diabetes (range: US dollars 1.0-2.8 billion), US dollars 15.0 billion for Type 2 diabetes (range: US dollars 7.6-22.4 billion), and US dollars 16.8 billion for all diabetes (range: US dollars 8.5-25.2 billion). In the UK, the total annual costs to the National Health Service (NHS) of managing DN were US dollars 231 million ( pound 152 million) for Type 1 diabetes (range: US dollars 190-350 million [ pound 125-230 million]), US dollars 933 million (pound 614 million) for Type 2 diabetes (range: US dollars 809 million-US dollars 1.4 billion [pound 532-927 million]), and US dollars 1.2 billion ( pound 765 million) for all diabetes (range: US dollars 999 million-US dollars 1.8 billion [pound 657 million- pound 1.2 billion]). CONCLUSIONS: The total annual cost of DN is 13 times greater in the USA than in the UK. Controlling for the substantially higher number of people at risk, the total cost per person with DN and/or a kidney transplant is 40% higher: US dollars 3735 in the USA and US dollars 2672 (pound 1758) in the UK.     

The risk of herpes zoster in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the United States and the United Kingdom

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the incidence of herpes zoster is elevated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and whether herpes zoster is associated with use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with RA. METHODS: Two retrospective cohort studies were conducted using data from a US integrated managed care database (PharMetrics claims database) from 1998-2002 and the UK General Practice Research Database (GPRD) between 1990-2001. Rates of herpes zoster among patients with RA and randomly sampled non-RA patients were compared. A nested case-control analysis was performed within each RA cohort to examine the effect of current treatment on herpes zoster risk. RESULTS: A total of 122,272 patients with RA from the PharMetrics database and 38,621 from the GPRD were included. The adjusted hazard ratios of herpes zoster for patients with RA compared with non-RA patients were 1.91 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.80-2.03) in the PharMetrics database and 1.65 (95% CI 1.57-1.75) in the GPRD. In the PharMetrics database, current use of biologic DMARDs alone was associated with herpes zoster (odds ratio [OR] 1.54, 95% CI 1.04-2.29), as was current use of traditional DMARDs alone (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.18-1.59). In the GPRD, current use of traditional DMARDs was associated with herpes zoster (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.10-1.48). In both data sources, use of oral corticosteroids was associated with herpes zoster regardless of concomitant therapies. CONCLUSION: Data from 2 large databases suggested that patients with RA are at increased risk of herpes zoster. Among patients with RA, DMARDs and/or use of oral corticosteroids appeared to be associated with herpes zoster.     

Botulism in the United Kingdom

Clostridium botulinum is a spore forming bacterium that grows in the absence of oxygen and is responsible for three main epidemiological categories of disease: foodborne, infant, and wound botulism. Foodborne botulism is an intoxication caused by ingestio