Renal allograft rupture caused by acute tubular necrosis

Renal allograft rupture is a rare but potentially lethal complication of kidney transplantation. A renal allograft recipient receiving quadruple immunosuppressive therapy developed a spontaneous allograft rupture 13 days after kidney transplantation. Warm ischaemia time during the transplant was 80 minutes. The ruptured kidney graft could not be salvaged because of the patient's haemodynamic instability. The histopathological examination showed interstitial oedema with severe acute tubular necrosis with no signs of acute rejection. The most common causes of renal graft rupture are acute rejection and vein thrombosis, while acute tubular necrosis may only rarely be responsible for this complication. Renal graft rupture may be the result of interstitial damage attributed both to the prolonged warm ischaemia time during the transplant and to post-transplant acute tubular necrosis in the absence of graft rejection. In those patients whose haemodynamic status cannot be stabilized by appropriate aggressive haemodynamic support therapy, graft nephrectomy should be considered the only definitive treatment.     

Utility of biopsy in kidney transplants with delayed graft function and acute dysfunction

Renal biopsy is currently the gold standard to assess the causes of renal allograft dysfunction. In the present study, we prospectively assessed the role of the renal allograft biopsy in the diagnosis and treatment of renal allograft dysfunction. Seven hundred and fifteen biopsies were performed in 399 patients. The anatomopathological results in group 1 (delayed graft function) were: 60.4% acute tubular necrosis, 17.6% acute rejection, 4.3% calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, and 17.7% other diagnoses; in group 2 (acute graft dysfunction): 42.3% acute rejection, 22% acute tubular necrosis, 8.4% calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, and 27.3% other diagnoses. Among patients with delayed graft function, 42.2% of biopsies led to a change in the treatment. In 60.5%, the biopsy of patients with acute dysfunction led to a change in the patient management. In our series, the result of the biopsy disagreed with the clinical diagnosis in 39.6% and 57.7% of cases, respectively. These results demonstrated that renal graft biopsy remains an indispensable tool for the accurate management of kidney transplant patients.     

Surgical repair of spontaneous renal allograft rupture: a new procedure

Background: The purpose of the present paper is to introduce a new surgical procedure using the external oblique aponeurosis (EOA) for repair of spontaneous renal allograft rupture. Methods: Thirty‐eight cases with spontaneous renal allograft rupture were encountered in 1000 consecutive kidney transplants between April 1991 and August 2000. Thirty‐three cases underwent surgical exploration with two grafts undergoing nephrectomy, while a further 31 were repaired using the new surgical procedure. The external oblique aponeurosis (EOA) from the incision was trimmed into 1 cm × 1 cm square pieces. A 2/0 Dexon suture was placed through each piece of the EOA, then through the parenchyma of the kidney perpendicular to the rupture. Each suture was then placed through another piece of EOA and tied. Results: Two repaired grafts were removed on day 7 and day 10, one due to graft re‐rupture and another with ischaemia secondary to irreversible acute rejection. The graft function of 29 cases had recovered completely at 30 days following surgical repair with one graft improving rapidly. Thirteen grafts were diagnosed as undergoing mild to moderate acute rejection, whereas a further 20 cases were considered to have acute tubular necrosis on histopathology. The allograft survival rate at 1 year and 5 years post grafting was 86% and 64%, respectively. No patients died from postoperative complications following repair using this procedure. Conclusions: Spontaneous renal allograft rupture is a relatively common post‐transplant complication secondary to either acute tubular necrosis or acute rejection. This new surgical procedure is proposed as a reliable and practical method of repair following graft rupture. Preservation of graft function and viability following rupture appears achievable both in the medium and long‐term.     

Renal allograft rupture: diagnostic role of ultrasound.

To evaluate the diagnostic role of ultrasound in spontaneous renal allograft rupture we reviewed 18 cases observed in our centre in 10 years. Ultrasound studies were performed immediately before surgery in 15 cases. Renal allograft rupture occurred during the first 3 weeks after transplantation in 17 cases (94%). Clinical findings were consistent with previous reports. The diagnosis was confirmed by surgical exploration in 17 cases, and by necropsy in the remaining one. Nine patients were treated by corsetage and eight by graft nephrectomy, while one patient died before surgery. Acute rejection was present in nine cases, and severe acute tubular necrosis in five; no renal tissue was available for histological study in four patients. On ultrasound examination, perirenal haematoma was the most frequent finding, while subcapsular/intrarenal haematoma or findings suggesting rejection or urinary tract obstruction were less frequently observed. In six cases, disruption of the white linear echoes of the capsule of the graft could be seen; this finding has not been described previously. Ultrasound has a definite role in presurgical evaluation of suspected renal transplant rupture.     

Delayed presentation of arteriovenous fistula and pseudoaneurysms in a renal transplant patient 10 years after percutaneous allograft biopsy

A 51-year-old man was admitted with microscopic hematuria at 10 years after living donor renal transplantation. In order to distinguish between acute tubular necrosis and acute rejection, a graft biopsy was performed under ultrasound guidance at 1 month posttransplantation. Doppler sonography revealed 3 pulsatile cystic masses and an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) in the lower kidney pole. Selective transplant renal angiography revealed 3 pseudoaneurysms with an AVF supplied by a lobular artery in the lower pole. The diagnosis was AVF with pseudoaneurysm, which developed secondary to percutaneous renal allograft biopsy. Interventional treatment was performed because of the high risk for pseudoaneurysm rupture. The AVF and pseudoaneurysms were treated successfully by percutaneous transluminal embolization; renal function remained stable after embolization.     

The role of C-reactive protein in graft dysfunction after renal transplantation

PURPOSE: We investigated whether serial daily measurements of serum C-reactive protein could help differentiate episodes of transplant dysfunction due to rejection, infection, cyclosporin A nephrotoxicity or acute tubular necrosis in renal allograft recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Morning serum was obtained daily from 134 patients during the first 30 days after renal transplantation. All episodes of graft dysfunction were recorded and compared to transplant biopsies. C-reactive protein concentrations were correlated with postoperative graft function and the various causes of graft dysfunction. RESULTS: All patients demonstrated an increase in C-reactive protein in response to surgery and a maximum level was reached on day 2 after transplantation. Mean C-reactive protein concentration was significantly increased for delayed (61.50 microg./ml.) compared to primary (mean 38.01) graft function (p = 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). There were significant increases in C-reactive protein for bacterial infections other than asymptomatic bacteriuria (33.98 microg./ml), interstitial graft rejection (16.43) and acute tubular necrosis (30.50) compared to uneventful courses. C-reactive protein was unchanged for viral infections or cyclosporin A toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Serial C-reactive protein measurements help to identify renal transplant dysfunction of different origins. However, rejection, infection and acute tubular necrosis show similar patterns of C-reactive protein increase. Thus, C-reactive protein is unable to discriminate the causes of renal graft dysfunction. Biopsy remains the gold standard for the differential diagnosis of renal allograft dysfunction.     

A Case of Recurrent Episodes of Acute Renal Allograft Failure Caused by Renal Pedicle Tortion

Background: Acute allograft failure which occur intermittently after renal transplantation caused by graft tortion is a very rare entity. We here report highly unusual case of recurrent episodes of acute allograft dysfunction two years after kidney transplantation secondary to ischemic tubular necrosis caused by tortion of renal pedicle due to rotation of the allograft with body movements. Case Presentation: A 55 year-old male patient with living unrelated kidney transplantation for chronic renal failure caused by autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease had presented recurrent acute deteriorations in renal functions. All laboratory values were within normal limits except elevated serum creatinine levels, acute tubular necrosis in graft biopsy, and detection of pelvic dilatation in renal ultrasonography from time to time. Changes in axis of graft in nuclear medicine scans taken at different times during the same study made us bring to mind the diagnosis of renal pedicle tortion. Renal blood flow measurements with Doppler ultrasonography in different body positions helped to reach the final diagnosis of mobile kidney right on time. The patient is now well after prompt surgical treatment with nephropexy. Discussion: Unfortunately, tortion of allograft once occurred is associated with very high rate of graft loss due to arterial compromise and infarction and it is very difficult to diagnose without high level of suspicion. We discuss the causes of renal allograft tortion and the measures to prevent its occurrence and the methods to diagnose.     

Spontaneous kidney allograft rupture

Spontaneous renal allograft rupture is one of the most dangerous complications of kidney transplantation, which can result in graft loss. This condition needs immediate surgical intervention. Conservative management has dismal results. Its prevalence varies from 0.3% to 3%. Rupture occurs in first few weeks after transplantation. Predisposing factors for graft rupture are acute rejection, acute tubular necrosis, and renal vein thrombosis. There are growing reports about successful results of repairing these ruptured kidneys. In this study, we reviewed the medical records of 1682 patients who received kidney allografts from living donors from 1986 through 2003. There were six (0.35%) cases of renal allograft rupture. All were preceded by acute graft rejection. They were treated with antirejection medications. In first three cases, the kidney allografts were removed because the procedure of choice in this situation is graft nephrectomy; but in three next cases we repaired the ruptured grafts with good results in two of them. In conclusion, the procedure of choice for kidney allograft rupture is graft repair.     

Monitoring anti-HLA Class I IgG antibodies in renal transplant recipients

Anti-HLA class I IgG antibodies play an important role in hyperacute rejection but the significance of its de novo appearance or increase in levels during the posttransplant period remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine the correlation between the anti-HLA class I IgG antibodies and posttransplant events during the first 4 months after renal transplantation. From 200 renal allograft recipients, 549 serum samples were retrospectively evaluated. Patients who experienced graft dysfunction confirmed by biopsy had three serum samples tested: before, during (within 24 hours), and after the event. The presence of anti-HLA antibodies was observed in recipients with chronic allograft nephropathy (60%); acute rejection (clinical criteria without biopsy 57.1%); rejection types IIA (7.1%), IIB (40%), and III (50%); borderline changes (42.8%); acute tubular necrosis (34.4%); infarction (25%); and no rejection (12.5%). We observed a high incidence of anti-HLA class I IgG antibodies during acute tubular necrosis, borderline changes, acute rejection types IIB and III, and chronic allograft nephropathy.     

Early acute rejection does not affect chronic allograft nephropathy and death censored graft failure

BACKGROUND: Even with the development of modern immunosuppression, an acute rejection episode is a major complication after renal transplantation. Acute rejection episodes have been used as clinical indicators for chronic allograft nephropathy and graft loss. We investigated the timing and frequency of acute rejection episodes in relation to long-term graft survival and chronic allograft nephropathy. METHODS: The Long Term Efficacy and Safety Surveillance study of transplant patients receiving cyclosporin (Neoral) included 1706 adult renal transplants (1995 to 2003) with a functioning graft for at least 1 year. The impact on death-censored long-term graft survival was evaluated for acute rejection episodes (single or multiple) within 3 months, at 3 to 6 months, at 6 to 12 months, or at over 1 year posttransplant. A stepwise binary logistic regression was employed to identify independent risk factors for the time to occurrence of an acute rejection episode. RESULTS: An acute rejection episode occurring within 3 months posttransplantation had no effect on either death-censored long-term graft failure (P=.2157) or chronic allograft nephropathy (P=.9331). However, an acute rejection episode occurring at 1 year or later posttransplantation was significantly associated with death censored long-term graft failure (P <.0001) and chronic allograft nephropathy (P <.0001). The numbers of HLA-DR mismatches and younger recipient ages were independent risk factors for early acute rejection. CONCLUSION: Among patients whose graft survives at least 12 months, an early acute rejection episode within 3 months posttransplant was not associated with either death-censored long-term graft survival or chronic allograft nephropathy among adults treated with cyclosporin. However, an acute rejection episode occurring at 1 year or later posttransplantation showed a positive association with death-censored long-term graft survival or chronic allograft nephropathy. Lower numbers of HLA-DR mismatches sum to reduce the occurrence of acute rejection and the hospitalization time.     

Late spontaneous kidney graft decapsulation after administration of sirolimus in a recipient with chronic hepatitis B and C infection: a case report

Late spontaneous kidney graft decapsulation with fluid collection is a rare condition with only a few cases reported in the literature. Common causes of renal allograft rupture include acute rejection, acute tubular necrosis, renal vein thrombosis, and trauma. Sirolimus related late spontaneous decapsulation has not been reported in the past. Interestingly, sirolimus may promote lymphocele formation in renal transplant recipients, including those presenting with chronic hepatitis B or C. Herein, we report a case of late spontaneous decapsulation with subcapsular hematoma formation developing 12 years after receipt of a cadaveric allograft. The patient was infected with both hepatitis B and C viruses. Cyclosporine was replaced by sirolimus for maintenance therapy because of chronic rejection and acute deterioration of renal function. He presented to the hospital at 9 months after sirolimus inception because of a sudden onset of pain and swelling over the kidney graft. Magnetic resonance imaging found the capsule to be stripped from the kidney by a collection of liquefied hematomas. A laparoscopic fenestration was performed by creation of a peritoneal window adjacent to the renal allograft. When patients have chronic hepatitis, tacrolimus might be a better choice than sirolimus.     

The Impact of Living Donor Nephrectomy With Multiple Renal Arteries on Graft Function and Complications in Renal Transplantation

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the early outcome of living donor kidney transplantation using allografts with a single artery and multiple arteries.MethodsFrom February 2018 to December 2019, a total of 62 patients underwent living donor nephrectomy at our institution: 20 multiple artery donor nephrectomies (MADNs) and 42 single artery donor nephrectomies (SADNs). All operations were performed by the same surgeon as the laparoscopic procedure. The MADN and SADN groups were compared regarding donor and recipient hospital stay, operative time, warm ischemia time, and postoperative complications with Clavien-Dindo classification. Graft function was evaluated considering episodes of acute tubular necrosis during the first week, delayed graft function, serum creatinine (SCr), and glomerular filtration rate for 6 months after transplantation.ResultsSixty-two patients were included in this study. There was no difference in terms of age, sex, body mass index, nephrectomy side, smoking status, preoperative SCr, or preoperative glomerular filtration rate between the 2 groups. Warm ischemia time and operation time were statistically significantly higher in the MADN group (P < .001 and P < .001). Regarding graft function, the prevalence of acute tubular necrosis did not differ between groups. There was also no significant difference in the acute rejection or mortality rates after transplantation. Although SCr levels were lower in multiple renal artery recipients, there was no statistical difference during the 6 months of follow-up. Recipient morbidity and mortality were not different between the 2 groups.ConclusionsRenal allograft transplantation with multiple renal arteries can be performed with reasonable complications and acceptable results.     

Diagnostic significance of semiquantitative and quantitative parameters of Tc99m-Ethylenedicystine renal allograft scintigraphy

OBJECTIVES: No objective parameters for renal allograft evaluation have yet been described for Tc99m-Ethylenedicystine. This study evaluates the diagnostic significance of different quantitative and semi-quantitative parameters of renal allograft scintigraphy using Tc99m-Ethylenedicystine. METHODS: A total of 72 renal dynamic scintigraphic studies were performed within 2-weeks of renal transplantation in 42 patients. The graft perfusion, kidney/aorta ratio, washout index and retention index were derived from all studies. All these parameters were evaluated for their ability to distinguish between a normal graft, a graft with acute rejection (AR), and a graft with acute tubular necrosis (ATN). Histopathological verification of diagnosis was obtained in all cases. RESULTS: Studies were subdivided into 3 groups according to histopathological findings: acute rejection (n = 42), normal (n = 18) and acute tubular necrosis (n = 12). Normal allografts were visualized with in 2.66 +/- 0.59 seconds of visualization of abdominal aorta. The K/A ratio, wash out index and retention index was 15.22 +/- 6.86, 1.67 +/- 0.45, and 5.48 +/- 0.98 respectively. Allografts with ATN were visualized with in 3.36 +/- 0.80 seconds of visualization of abdominal aorta. The K/A ratio, wash out index and retention index was 12.73 +/- 6.74, 0.60 +/- 0.14, and 9.18 +/- 1.48 respectively. In AR, allografts were visualized 15.18 +/- 9.48 seconds after visualization of abdominal aorta. The K/A ratio, wash out index and retention index was 7.07 +/- 2.15, 0.63 +/- 0.11, and 2.26 +/- 1.28 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Retention index can separate all the three condition of normal, acute rejection and acute tubular necrosis from each other. Retention index of < 4 suggests acute rejection, a value between 4 and 7 suggests normal allograft and a value of > or = 7 is suggestive of acute tubular necrosis. However, perfusion, K/A ratio and washout index can not segregate all the three groups.     

Renal allograft rupture.

In the present material of 448 consecutive renal transplants the incidence of allograft rupture was 3.6%. Among 389 first transplants there were two ruptures in the living donor group (126 patients, 1.5%) and 12 ruptures in the cadaveric donor group (263 patients, 4.6%). Only one ruptured kidney (living donor) achieved long term function. Four patients with first graft rupture were retransplanted with early loss of the kidney in all, in two because of rupture. Two of these patients received a 3rd cadaveric graft, of which one is functioning well after two years. All ruptures occurred within three weeks after transplantation, 14 kidneys ruptured during the first week. The clinical course and the operative findings suggested that rejection was the cause of rupture in all cases. This was confirmed by light and immunofluorescent microscopy of specimens from 15 kidneys, while one kidney only demonstrated extensive intrarenal vessel thrombosis. It is concluded that renal allograft rupture signals a strong immunological response in the recipient with poor graft prognosis. The chance of a successful retransplantation is small.     

Evaluation of renal grafts in patients with lupus nephritis as cause of end-stage renal disease

INTRODUCTION: Kidney transplantation is the best option in end-stage renal disease (ESRD). For many years patients affected with lupus nephritis have had poor graft results. However, this has been changing over recent years with the development of new immunosuppressive drugs and a better comprehension of the natural evolution of the entity. METHODS: We studied 20 patients with lupus nephritis who received 22 kidney grafts: 15 women and five men (n = 11) who were treated with cyclosporine or with tacrolimus (n = 11). Secondary immunosuppression included mycophenolate match (MMF) (n = 13) or azathioprine (n = 9). We analyzed human leukocyte antigen, cold ischemia time, acute tubular necrosis, creatinine, cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose, blood pressure, acute rejection episodes, immunosuppression, infections, disease recurrences, as well as graft and patient survival. RESULTS: After a mean cold ischemia time of 22 +/- 4 hours, nine patients displayed delayed graft function of an average duration 9 +/- 4 days. At 36 +/- 35 months nine grafts were lost: two due to acute rejection; five to chronic allograft nephropathy; and two to venous thrombosis. One patient died of hemorrhagic shock. There were five cytomegalovirus infections. Graft survival was dependent on the type of secondary immunosuppression, incidence of acute rejection episodes and occurrence of delayed graft function. CONCLUSIONS: We found no clinical recurrence of lupus nephritis after transplantation and a low incidence of complications, although there was a trend toward thrombosis. The presence of delayed graft function, episodes of acute rejection, and receiving azathioprine instead of MMF as secondary immunosuppression were associated with poorer graft survival.     

The contribution of adhesion molecule expression in donor kidney biopsies to early allograft dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Renal allograft rejection is associated with the expression of adhesion molecules on vascular endothelial and tubular epithelial cells. METHODS: To assess whether the number of cell adhesion molecules expressed in donor kidneys can predict early rejection or delayed graft function, kidney biopsies from 20 living and 53 cadaveric kidney donors were obtained before engraftment into the recipients and the expression of the cell adhesion molecules intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), and endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule (E-selectin) were determined by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: All biopsies from living donors showed significantly lower expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 compared to biopsies from cadaveric donors. There was no difference in the expression of adhesion molecules on tubular cells between transplants with primary function compared to allografts with early rejection in living donated kidneys (ICAM-1: 2+/-8 vs. 3+/-8%; VCAM-1: 9+/-7 vs. 1+/-1%), as well as in cadaveric kidneys (ICAM-1: 38+/-29 vs. 39+/-38%; VCAM-1: 55+/-27 vs. 48+/-29%). The expression of ICAM-1 molecules on tubular cells was determined to be a predictor for the occurrence of delayed graft function in cadaveric kidneys (ICAM-1: 65+/-24* vs. 38+/-29% delayed graft versus primary graft function). No delayed graft function occurred in recipients of living donated kidneys. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that adhesion molecule expression in donor biopsies is not a predictor for early allograft rejection, but can be used as a marker for the development of postischemic acute renal allograft failure.     

Severe renal tubular acidosis in a renal transplant recipient with repeated acute rejections and chronic allograft nephropathy

Renal tubular acidosis in renal transplant recipients usually is asymptomatic and subclinical. The authors report a case of severe renal tubular acidosis manifested as muscle weakness in a renal transplant recipient. The patient received a renal transplant 30 months ago and had a history of successive episodes of acute rejection during the past 2 months. On admission, arterial blood (arterial blood pH, 7.11; pco₂, 12.8 mm Hg; and bicarbonate, 4 mEq/L [4 mmol/L]) and urine gas analysis were compatible with distal renal tubular acidosis. The graft biopsy findings showed superimposed acute rejection on chronic allograft nephropathy, and immunohistochemical staining and electron microscopic findings showed the reduced immunoactivity of H⁺ATPase pump and anion exchanger 1. The patient was treated successfully with intravenous bicarbonate and oral steroid pulse therapy. This finding suggests that rejection-related renal tubular acidosis should be considered a cause of severely affected metabolic acidosis in renal transplant recipients. Am J Kidney Dis 41:E6.     

肾移植术后急性体液性排斥反应的治疗

目的 总结肾移植术后急性体液性排斥反应中针对HLA抗体的检测和处理经验.方法 肾移植受者15例,术前行HLA分型、交叉配型和群体反应性抗体(PRA)的检测,术后采用他克莫司(或环孢素A)、霉酚酸酯和糖皮质激素预防排斥反应.15例于肾移植后1～14 d发生抗体介导的急性排斥反应(AMR),采用抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(100 mg/d,使用5 d)治疗,或将环孢素A转换为他克莫司,当PRA明显升高,且血清中出现供者特异性HLA抗体时,即行血浆置换(PP),共行1～5次,每次PP后静脉输注免疫球蛋白(IVIG)100～150 mg/kg,最后1次PP后给予WIG 200～500mg/kg.结果 术后出现抗供者特异性HLA Ⅰ类抗体者9例,抗HLAⅡ类抗体者4例,同时出现抗Ⅰ、Ⅱ类抗体者2例.14例的AMR逆转,1例术后发生移植肾功能恢复延迟,彩色多普勒超声波显示移植肾血流灌注差,于术后第10天切除移植肾.并行二行肾移植.2例AMR后并发急性肾小管坏死,透析后移植肾功能恢复正常.抗排斥反应治疗期间患者均未发生严重感染.随访12～52个月,1例因慢性移植肾肾病恢复血液透析治疗,1例死于心血管疾病,其余患者移植肾功能稳定.结论 将ATG、PP和IVIG联合应用能有效逆转AMR.     

Relationship of recipient age and development of chronic allograft failure

BACKGROUND: The elderly are the fastest growing segment of the end stage renal disease (ERSD) population. Older renal transplant recipients experience fewer acute rejection episodes than do younger patients. Despite this, death censored graft survival is no better in these older transplant recipients than in younger recipients. We examined the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) database to determine whether recipient age itself has an independent effect on the development of chronic allograft failure (CAF). METHODS: We analyzed 59,509 patients from the files of the USRDS. To determine whether age was an independent risk factor for CAF, the population was analyzed separately for Caucasians, African-Americans, and other ethnic groups. All renal transplant recipients from 1988 to 1997 were examined. Both univariate and multivariate analysis were performed using chronic allograft failure as the outcome of interest. RESULTS: Actuarial 8-year censored graft survival was significantly decreased in the older age groups 67% for ages 18-49 vs. 61.8% for ages 50-64 vs. 50.7% for ages 65+ (P<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, recipient age was a strong and independent risk factor for the development of chronic allograft failure in Caucasians (RR 1.29 for ages 50-64, RR 1.67 for ages older than 65). These findings were reinforced by an analysis that was restricted to living donor transplants without acute rejection. CONCLUSION: In Caucasians increased recipient age is an independent risk factor for the development of chronic renal allograft failure.     

Elderly donor kidney transplant: factors involved in graft survival

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether control of risk factors associated with worse results has improved graft survival, with respect of renal function quality and other factors influencing graft survival: recipient age, immunosuppressive therapy, cold ischemia time, acute tubular necrosis (ATN), acute rejection episodes (ARE) and 1-month creatinine levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 147 patients who underwent kidney transplant between 1995 and 2001. Inclusion criteria were donor and recipient age older than 60 years, first renal transplant, follow-up period longer than 12 months, donor creatinine clearance higher than 75 mL/min, and less than 20% glomerulosclerosis observed in donor renal biopsy. RESULTS: Graft survivals were 87%, 83%, 78%, and 70% at first, second, third, and fifth year after transplantation, respectively. Mean serum creatinine levels were 2.3 mg/dL and mean follow-up time, 46 months. Multivariate analysis using a Cox regression model identified donor age, ARE, and serum creatinine levels 1 month after surgery as independent variables affecting graft survival. Recipient age, immunosuppressive therapy, and serum creatinine levels at 1 month after surgery were predictive variables of recipient survival. DISCUSSION: Renal transplantation is an accepted therapeutic option in elderly patients with chronic renal insufficiency, if both donor and recipient are carefully selected.