Randomized phase II study of fludarabine + cytosine arabinoside + idarubicin +/- all-trans retinoic acid +/- granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in poor prognosis newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome

Preclinical data suggest that retinoids, eg, all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA), lower concentrations of antiapoptotic proteins such as bcl-2, possibly thereby improving the outcome of anti-acute myeloid leukemia (AML) chemotherapy. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been considered to be potentially synergistic with ATRA in this regard. Accordingly, we randomized 215 patients with newly diagnosed AML (153 patients) or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (refractory anemia with excess blasts [RAEB] or RAEB-t, 62 patients) to receive fludarabine + ara-C + idarubicin (FAI) alone, FAI + ATRA, FAI + G-CSF, or FAI + ATRA + G-CSF. Eligibility required one of the following: age over 71 years, a history of abnormal blood counts before M.D. Anderson (MDA) presentation, secondary AML/MDS, failure to respond to one prior course of chemotherapy given outside MDA, or abnormal renal or hepatic function. For the two treatment arms containing ATRA, ATRA was given 2 days (day-2) before beginning and continued for 3 days after completion of FAI. For the two treatment arms including G-CSF, G-CSF began on day-1 and continued until neutrophil recovery. Patients with white blood cell (WBC) counts >50,000/microL began ATRA on day 1 and G-CSF on day 2. Events (death, failure to achieve complete remission [CR], or relapse from CR) have occurred in 77% of the 215 patients. Reflecting the poor prognosis of the patients entered, the CR rate was only 51%, median event-free survival (EFS) time once in CR was 36 weeks, and median survival time was 28 weeks. A Cox regression analysis indicated that, after accounting for patient prognostic variables, none of the three adjuvant treatment combinations (FAI + ATRA, FAI + G, FAI + ATRA + G) affected survival, EFS, or EFS once in CR compared with FAI. Similarly, there were no significant effects of either ATRA ignoring G-CSF, or of G-CSF ignoring ATRA. As previously found, a diagnosis of RAEB or RAEB-t rather than AML was insignificant. There were no indications that the effect of ATRA differed according to cytogenetic group, diagnosis (AML or MDS), or treatment schedule. Logistic regression analysis indicated that, after accounting for prognosis, addition of G-CSF +/- ATRA to FAI improved CR rate versus either FAI or FAI + ATRA, but G-CSF had no effect on the other outcomes. We conclude that addition of ATRA +/- G-CSF to FAI had no effect on CR rate, survival, EFS, or EFS in CR in poor prognosis, newly diagnosed AML or high-risk MDS.     

Comparison of 'sequential' versus 'standard' chemotherapy as re-induction treatment, with or without cyclosporine, in refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia (AML): results of the UK Medical Research Council AML-R trial

This aim of the acute myeloid leukaemia (AML)-R trial was to compare sequential (Seq) ADE (cytarabine, daunorubicin, etoposide) with standard (Std) ADE as remission re-induction treatment and to assess any benefit of cyclosporine (CSA) as a multidrug resistance modulator in refractory/relapsed AML patients. Seq ADE, based on the concept of Timed Sequential Therapy, comprised the same drugs as Std ADE but given at higher doses and in a different sequence. Between 1992 and 1997, 235 patients with relapsed (175) and refractory (60) AML were entered: 170 were randomized between Std versus Seq ADE and 213 between CSA versus no CSA. CSA was initially given at a dose of 5 mg/kg/d and increased to 10 mg/kg/d in the latter part of the trial. Overall, the complete remission (CR) rate was 43%, with Std ADE being significantly better than Seq ADE (54% versus 34%, P = 0.01). CR rates did not differ between the CSA and no CSA arms (41% versus 45%, P = 0.6). Overall, 3 year disease-free survival (DFS) of remitters was 16%, with a relapse risk of 70%. DFS was not significantly different between the chemotherapy or the CSA arms. Overall, 3 year survival was 8%. Survival with Std ADE was significantly better than with Seq ADE (12% versus 6%, P = 0.03). CSA did not affect overall survival, except in patients > or = 60 years, who fared worse on CSA (P = 0.0003). No difference in haematological toxicity between the chemotherapy or CSA arms was seen. Survival was better with longer first CR duration (P < 0.0001). We conclude that Std ADE was superior to Seq ADE for CR achievement and survival, with no benefit with CSA, at the doses used in this study.     

Improvement of prognosis in refractory and relapsed acute promyelocytic leukemia over recent years: the role of all-trans retinoic acid therapy

 With the aim of determining the ability of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) to improve prognosis in refractory and relapsed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), the data of 45 patients resistant to previous conventional chemotherapy or in first relapse were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-seven patients presented with typical M3, five with variant form (M3v), and three with intermediate form. Seven patients died before any chemotherapy could be given. Thirty-five patients received one course of chemotherapy combining anthracyclines and cytarabine without (n=22) or with ATRA (n=13), according to different protocols. One elderly patient received only ATRA, and two patients received only low-dose cytarabine. Nine patients died within 4 weeks of relapse. A complete remission (CR) was achieved in 29 of the 38 patients retreated after first relapse or primary failure (76.3%, 95% CI: 60–89%). Among relapsed patients, four of five patients who had initially received ATRA therapy achieved a second CR when retreated by ATRA. The median second disease-free survival (DFS) was 23.3 months. Overall median survival was 7.8 months, with a 5-year survival rate of 29% (95% CI: 14–44%). Parameters found to be associated with decreased second CR rate were presence of hemorrhages and hemostatic disorder, and high levels of GGT at the time of relapse. Factors associated with short survival were WHO performance status >1, high serum LDH levels, and coagulopathy at time of relapse. Use of ATRA at time of relapse (n=14) was significantly associated with higher CR rates (p=0.008), longer DFS (median not reached versus 7.9 months;p=0.05), and longer survival after first relapse (median 32.3 months versus 4.4 months;p=0.003). In the multivariate analysis, the only factor predictive of poor prognosis for overall survival was the absence of ATRA therapy at relapse. We conclude that ATRA is effective in the treatment of relapsed or refractory APL and appears superior to chemotherapy alone. Received: 13 June 1997 / Accepted: 8 September 1997     

The superiority of haploidentical related stem cell transplantation over chemotherapy alone as postremission treatment for patients with intermediate- or high-risk acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission

We report the results of a prospective, patient self-selected study evaluating whether haploidentical related donor stem cell transplantation (HRD-HSCT) is superior to chemotherapy alone as postremission treatment for patients with intermediate- or high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1). Among totally 419 newly diagnosed AML patients, 132 patients with intermediate- and high-risk cytogenetics achieved CR1 and received chemotherapy alone (n = 74) or HSCT (n = 58) as postremission treatment. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 4 years was 37.5% ± 4.5%. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 4 years were 64.5% ± 5.1% and 55.6% ± 5.0%, respectively. The cumulative incident of relapse for the HRD-HSCT group was significantly lower than that for the chemotherapy-alone group (12.0% ± 4.6% vs 57.8% ± 6.2%, respectively; P < .0001). HRD-HSCT resulted in superior survival compared with chemotherapy alone (4-year DFS, 73.1% ± 7.1% vs 44.2% ± 6.2%, respectively; P < .0001; 4-year OS, 77.5% ± 7.1% vs 54.7% ± 6.3%, respectively; P = .001). Multivariate analysis revealed postremission treatment (HRD-HSCT vs chemotherapy) and high WBC counts at diagnosis as independent risk factors affecting relapse, DFS, and OS. Our results suggest that HRD-HSCT is superior to chemotherapy alone as postremission treatment for AML.     

Aggressive chemotherapy combined with G-CSF and maintenance therapy with interleukin-2 for patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome,subacute or secondary acute myeloid leukemia — initial results

Summary Aggressive chemotherapy of advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), acute myeloid leukemia (AML) evolving from MDS, subacute AML and secondary AML has usually been associated with low complete remission (CR) rates, a high incidence of early death, and low disease-free survival. We therefore have initiated a phase-III trial of aggressive chemotherapy consisting of idarubicin, cytosine arabinoside, and VP-16 to improve the CR rate. Each chemotherapy cycle is followed by G-CSF to accelerate neutrophil recovery and to reduce the incidence of infections. Until now, 19 patients with high-risk AML have been entered. The CR rate is 47%, with only one death during induction. Patients achieving CR are randomized to receive either high-dose or low-dose interleukin-2 to eliminate residual leukemic cells and to prolong the duration of remission.Presented at the annual meeting of the German Society for Hematology and Oncology, 4–7 October 1992, Berlin     

Impact on acute myeloid leukemia relapse in granulocyte colony-stimulating factor application: a meta-analysis

ABSTRACT

Objectives: This meta-analysis evaluated the impact of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) added to chemotherapy on treatment outcomes including survival and disease recurrence in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Methods: Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched until 19 September 2016 using search terms. Studies that investigated patients with AML who underwent stem-cell transplantation were included.

Results: The overall analysis revealed a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) (P?=?.019) and disease-free survival (DFS) (P?=?.002) for patients receiving G-CSF with chemotherapy. Among patients without prior AML treatment, there was a significant improvement in DFS (P?=?.014) and reduction in incidence of relapse (P?=?.015) for those who received G-CSF. However, subgroup analyses found no significant difference between G-CSF (+) and G-CSF (?) treatments in rates of OS (P?=?.104) and complete remission (CR) (P?=?.572) for patients without prior AML treatment. Among patients with relapsed/refractory AML, there was no significant difference found between G-CSF (+) and G-CSF (?) groups for OS (P?=?.225), DFS (P?=?.209), and CR (P?=?.208).

Discussion: Treatment with chemotherapy plus G-CSF appears to provide better survival and treatment responses compared with chemotherapy alone, particularly for patients with previously untreated AML.

Abbreviations: AML, acute myeloid leukemia; CI, confidence interval; CR, complete remission; DFS, disease-free survival; G-CSF, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; GM-CSF, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor; HR, hazard ratio; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; OR, odds ratio; OS, overall survival; RCTs, randomized control trials; RR, relative risk     

Comparative analysis of remission induction therapy for high-risk MDS and AML progressed from MDS in the MDS200 study of Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group

A total of 120 patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and AML progressed from MDS (MDS–AML) were registered in a randomized controlled study of the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group (JALSG). Untreated adult patients with high-risk MDS and MDS–AML were randomly assigned to receive either idarubicin and cytosine arabinoside (IDR/Ara-C) (Group A) or low-dose cytosine arabinoside and aclarubicin (CA) (Group B). The remission rates were 64.7% for Group A (33 of 51 evaluable cases) and 43.9% for Group B (29 out of 66 evaluable cases). The 2-year overall survival rates and disease-free survival rates were 28.1 and 26.0% for Group A, and 32.1 and 24.8% for Group B, respectively. The duration of CR was 320.6 days for Group A and 378.7 days for Group B. There were 15 patients who lived longer than 1,000 days after diagnosis: 6 and 9 patients in Groups A and B, respectively. However, among patients enrolled in this trial, intensive chemotherapy did not produce better survival than low-dose chemotherapy. In conclusion, it is necessary to introduce the first line therapy excluding the chemotherapy that can prolong survival in patients with high-risk MDS and MDS–AML.     

The prognostic significance of leukemic cells clearance kinetics evaluation during the initial course of induction therapy with HAD (homoharringtonine, cytosine arabinoside, daunorubicin) in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia

The impact of the percentage of residual leukemic cells (RLCs) at the end of first course of induction chemotherapy (T1) or during aplasia (T2) on complete remission (CR) rate, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively analyzed in 72 cases of de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with HAD (homoharringtonine, cytosine arabinoside, and daunorubicin) regimen. The patients were separated into two subgroups by a cutoff of 10% bone marrow leukemic cells at T1 or T2 time point. The CR rate, DFS, and OS were significantly different between the two groups. We further confirmed that the percentage of RLCs at T1 or T2 is an independent prognostic factor of AML.     

Prognosis of inv(16)/t(16;16) acute myeloid leukemia (AML): a survey of 110 cases from the French AML Intergroup

Acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs) carrying inv(16)/t(16;16) chromosomal abnormalities are associated with a good prognosis. However, studies of this AML subtype have been hampered by the few number of patients reported, frequently collectively considered with those with AML carrying the t(8;21) translocation. We performed a retrospective study in 110 patients with inv(16)/t(16;16) AML (median age, 34 years) prospectively enrolled in 6 trials conducted in France between 1987 and 1998, with the aim to investigate prognostic factors for complete remission (CR) achievement and outcome of CR patients in this AML subtype. CR rate was 93%. Bad-prognosis factors for CR achievement were higher white blood cell count (WBC) and lower platelet count (optimal cutpoints at 120 and 30 x 109/L, respectively). At 3 years, estimated overall survival, disease-free survival (DFS), and cumulative incidence of relapse were 58%, 48%, and 42%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, (1) advanced age (optimal cutpoint, 35 years) was the only factor for shorter DFS and (2) advanced age and low platelet count were the 2 factors for shorter survival of CR patients. Outcome of CR patients (1) was not influenced by WBC and cytogenetic findings and (2) was similar among patients allocated to receive allogeneic transplantation, high-dose, or intermediate-dose cytarabine. Interestingly, advanced age was associated with a trend for more frequent additional chromosome abnormalities and predictive of higher cumulative incidence of relapse rather than death in first CR. These results markedly contrast with those reported in patients with t(8;21) AML in whom WBC, and not age, was the main high-risk factor for relapse, DFS, and survival.     

Use of glycosylated recombinant human G-CSF (lenograstim) during and/or after induction chemotherapy in patients 61 years of age and older with acute myeloid leukemia: final results of AML-13, a randomized phase-3 study

The role of glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in the induction treatment of older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is still uncertain. In this trial, a total of 722 patients with newly diagnosed AML, median age 68 years, were randomized into 4 treatment arms: (A) no G-CSF; (B) G-CSF during chemotherapy; (C) G-CSF after chemotherapy until day 28 or recovery of polymorphonuclear leukocytes; and (D) G-CSF during and after chemotherapy. The complete remission (CR) rate was 48.9% in group A, 52.2% in group B, 48.3% in group C, and 64.4% in group D. Analysis according to the 2 x 2 factorial design indicated that the CR rate was significantly higher in patients who received G-CSF during chemotherapy (58.3% for groups B + D vs 48.6% for groups A + C; P = .009), whereas no significant difference was observed between groups A + B and C + D (50.6% vs 56.4%, P = .12). In terms of overall survival, no significant differences were observed between the various groups. Patients who received G-CSF after chemotherapy had a shorter time to neutrophil recovery (median, 20 vs 25 days; P < .001) and a shorter hospitalization (mean, 27.2 vs 29.7 days; P < .001). We conclude that although priming with G-CSF can improve the CR rate, the use of G-CSF during and/or after chemotherapy has no effect on the long-term outcome of AML in older patients.     

The value of fludarabine in addition to ARA-C and G-CSF in the treatment of patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes and AML in elderly patients

Fludarabine in addition to cytosine-arabinoside (ARA-C) increases the accumulation of ARA-C-5'-triphosphate (ARA-CTP), which is responsible for the cytotoxic effect in leukemic blasts. In a randomized phase 3 trial, patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (n = 91) or elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (n = 43) were randomized to receive 2 induction courses consisting of ARA-C (2 g/m2 days 1 through 5) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (filgrastim, 5 microg/kg) during and after chemotherapy with or without fludarabine (25 mg/m2, days 1 through 5) (FLAG versus AG). Consolidation consisted of daunorubicin (45 mg/m2, days 1 through 3) and ARA-C (200 mg/m2, days 1 through 7). Complete remission (CR) rate following AG was 65% versus 71% with FLAG (P =.49). Overall survival (OS) at 24 months was 24% for AG treatment and 39% for FLAG (P =.32). Event-free survival (EFS) at 2 years was 10% and 19% (P =.31) for the AG and FLAG treatments, respectively. Platelet and granulocyte recovery times after the second cycle were prolonged in the FLAG treatment group. Grades 3 to 4 neurotoxicities were more often reported in the FLAG arm (14% versus 3%, P =.03), whereas no significant differences in other toxicities were observed. In a cohort of patients, the in vivo accumulation of ARA-CTP in leukemic cells was determined. Although ARA-CTP accumulation in leukemic cells after FLAG was enhanced, clinical outcome in terms of CR rate, OS, EFS, and disease-free survival (DFS) was not significantly improved by combining fludarabine with ARA-C.     

Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia

We report the results of a prospective, randomized phase 3 trial evaluating autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (ASCT) versus intensive consolidation chemotherapy in newly diagnosed AML patients in complete remission (CR1). Patients with AML (16-60 years) in CR1 after 2 cycles of intensive chemotherapy and not eligible for allogeneic SCT were randomized between intensive chemotherapy with etoposide and mitoxantrone or ASCT ater high-dose cyclophosphamide and busulfan. Of patients randomized (chemotherapy, n = 259; ASCT, n = 258), more than 90% received their assigned treatment. The 2 groups were comparable with regard to prognostic factors. The ASCT group showed a markedly reduced relapse rate (58% vs 70%, P = .02) and better relapse-free survival at 5 years (38% vs 29%, P = .065, hazard ratio = 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.1) with nonrelapse mortality of 4% versus 1% in the chemotherapy arm (P = .02). Overall survival was similar (44% vs 41% at 5 years, P = .86) because of more opportunities for salvage with second-line chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation in patients relapsing on the chemotherapy arm. This large study shows a relapse advantage for ASCT as postremission therapy but similar survival because more relapsing patients on the chemotherapy arm were salvaged with a late transplantation for relapse. This trial is registered at www.trialregister.nl as #NTR230 and #NTR291.     

Favorable effect of priming with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in remission induction of acute myeloid leukemia restricted to dose escalation of cytarabine

The clinical value of chemotherapy sensitization of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with G-CSF priming has remained controversial. Cytarabine is a key constituent of remission induction chemotherapy. The effect of G-CSF priming has not been investigated in relationship with variable dose levels of cytarabine. We randomized 917 AML patients to receive G-CSF (456 patients) or no G-CSF (461 patients) at the days of chemotherapy. In the initial part of the study, 406 patients were also randomized between 2 cytarabine regimens comparing conventional-dose (199 patients) versus escalated-dose (207 patients) cytarabine in cycles 1 and 2. We found that patients after induction chemotherapy plus G-CSF had similar overall survival (43% vs 40%, P = .88), event-free survival (37% vs 31%, P = .29), and relapse rates (34% vs 36%, P = .77) at 5 years as those not receiving G-CSF. However, patients treated with the escalated-dose cytarabine regimen benefited from G-CSF priming, with improved event-free survival (P = .01) and overall survival (P = .003), compared with patients without G-CSF undergoing escalated-dose cytarabine treatment. A significant survival advantage of sensitizing AML for chemotherapy with G-CSF was not apparent in the entire study group, but it was seen in patients treated with escalated-dose cytarabine during remission induction. The HOVON-42 study is registered under The Netherlands Trial Registry (www.trialregister.nl) as #NTR230.     

Autologous bone marrow transplantation for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a novel combined approach consisting of ex vivo marrow purging, modulation of multi-drug resistance, induction of autograft vs leukemia effect, and post-transplant immuno- and chemotherapy (PTIC)

In an attempt to reduce the high relapse rate associated with ABMT, five children with high-risk first CR and 19 in second or subsequent CR lacking matched family allogeneic donors underwent ABMT with chemopurged bone marrow utilizing verapamil (VPL), vincristine, and VP-16. Patients were conditioned with TBI, VPL bolus and infusion with VP-16 and cyclophosphamide. The first cohort of patients (n = 4) received only cyclosporin A (CsA). The second cohort (n = 7) received CsA and alpha interferon (total = 11 with post-transplant immunotherapy alone.) The third cohort (n = 13) received CsA and six alternating cycles of alphaIFN and chemotherapy and six additional cycles of chemotherapy (vincristine, VP-16, Ara-C, prednisone) followed by G-CSF (post-transplant immune chemotherapy (PTIC)). The 2-year DFS is 42+/-10% (90% confidence interval (CI) is 26.5-58.5%) and 2-year overall survival is 54+/-10% (90% CI is 37.5-70.5%). Furthermore, patients receiving PTIC (n = 13) vs immunotherapy alone (CsA+/-aIFN) (n = 11) had a substantially better 2 year DFS and OS: 69+/-13% vs 13+/-12% and 85+/-10% vs 25+/-15% (P = 0.008 and P = 0.06, respectively). These results suggest that the use of ABMT with chemopurging, combined with PTIC is well tolerated and may be an alternative new approach in the treatment of a subset of children with high-risk first CR or > or = second CR ALL who lack closely matched family-related allogeneic donors.     

Use of fludarabine in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a disease, which when left untreated, is invariably fatal. The disease is more common in elderly people, who also fare worse than younger patients with AML due to a higher rate of unfavorable prognostic factors, such as poor performance status, multiple comorbidities, reduced tolerance to treatment, 'unfavorable' chromosomal abnormalities and multidrug resistant protein-1 expression. While many patients achieve a complete remission, the rate of relapse is high and prognosis after relapse very poor. Promising results have been published in recent years using fludarabine-containing combination therapy for AML, most commonly fludarabine +cytarabine + granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) [FLAG], FLAG + mitoxantrone (FLANG), or FLAG + idarubicin (FLAG-Ida). Such combinations maximize favorable cytotoxic interactions between cytarabine and G-CSF, and between cytarabine and fludarabine. In small studies, such combinations used as second-line therapy have resulted in complete response (CR) rates of 36-59%. Early retrospective analyses suggested higher CR rates in patients with refractory AML than in those with relapsed AML, but this observation has not been confirmed in recent prospective trials. Fludarabine-containing combinations have also been evaluated as first-line therapy in high-risk patients and resulted in CR rates of 34-70%, with median survival from 7 to 16 months. The current large MRC randomized high-risk study will provide further data on the use of fludarabine-containing regimens in patients with poor prognosis AML. Further studies are investigating the use of fludarabine in combination with other agents, such as gemtuzumab ozogamicin and gemcitabine, in patients with AML.     

A multicenter,open, non-comparative,phase II study of the combination of cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine), cytarabine,and G-CSF as induction therapy in refractory acute myeloid leukemia - a report of the Polish Adult Leukemia Group (PALG)

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine, 2-CdA), cytarabine (Ara-C), and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) (CLAG) regimen in refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the multicenter phase II study. METHODS: The induction chemotherapy consisted of 2-CdA 5 mg/m2, Ara-C2 g/m2, and G-CSF. In the case of partial remission (PR), a second CLAG was administered. Patients in complete remission (CR) received two consolidation courses based on HD Ara-C, mitoxantrone or idarubicine, with or without 2-CdA. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients from 11 centers were registered; 50 primary resistant and eight early relapsed (CR1 < 6 months). CR was achieved in 29 (50%) patients, 19 (33%) were refractory, and 10 (17%) died early. Forty of 50 primary resistant patients received daunorubicin (DNR) and Ara-C as the first-line induction therapy (DA-7), 10 received additional 2-CdA (DAC-7). The CR rates after CLAG were 58% and 10%, respectively in each group (P = 0.015). Five of six patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/AML achieved CR. Hematologic toxicity was the most prominent toxicity of this regimen. The overall survival (OS, 1 yr) for the 58 patients as a whole, and the 29 patients in CR were 42% and 65%, respectively. Disease-free survival (DFS, 1 yr) was 29%. Only first-line induction treatment with DA-7 significantly influenced the probability of CR after CLAG. None of the analyzed factors significantly influenced DFS and OS. CONCLUSION: CLAG regimen has significant anti-leukemic activity and an acceptable toxicity in refractory AML. The addition of 2-CdA to the first-line induction treatment may worsen the results of salvage with CLAG. The high CR rate in patients with MDS preceding AML deserves further observation.     

Attempts to improve treatment outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in older patients: the results of the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML11 trial

In an attempt to improve induction chemotherapy for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML),1314 patients were randomized to 1 of 3 induction treatments for 2 courses of DAT (daunorubicin, cytarabine, and thioguanine) 3 + 10, ADE (daunorubicin, cytarabine, and etoposide) 10 + 3 + 5, or MAC (mitoxantrone-cytarabine). The remission rate in the DAT arm was significantly better than ADE (62% vs 50%; P =.002) or MAC (62% vs 55%; P =.04). This benefit was seen in patients younger and older than 70 years. There were no differences between the induction schedules with respect to overall survival at 5 years (12% vs 8% vs 10%). A total of 226 patients were randomized to receive granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or placebo as supportive care from day 8 after the end of treatment course 1. The remission rate or survival were not improved by G-CSF, although the median number of days to recover neutrophils to 1.0 x 10(9)/L was reduced by 5 days. Patients who entered remission (n = 371) were randomized to stop after a third course (DAT 2 + 7) or after 6 courses, ie, a subsequent COAP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, cytarabine, and prednisolone), DAT 2 + 5, and COAP. The relapse risk (81% vs 73%), disease-free survival (16% vs 23%), and overall survival at 5 years (23% vs 22%) did not differ between the 3-course or 6-course arms. In addition to a treatment duration randomization, 362 patients were randomized to receive 12-month maintenance treatment with low-dose interferon, but no benefit was seen with respect to relapse risk, disease-free survival, or overall survival.     

The value of the MDR1 reversal agent PSC-833 in addition to daunorubicin and cytarabine in the treatment of elderly patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML), in relation to MDR1 status at diagnosis

To determine whether MDR1 reversal by the addition of the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitor PSC-833 to standard induction chemotherapy would improve event-free survival (EFS), 419 untreated patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) aged 60 years and older were randomized to receive 2 induction cycles of daunorubicin and cytarabine with or without PSC-833. Patients in complete remission were then given 1 consolidation cycle without PSC-833. Neither complete response (CR) rate (54% versus 48%; P = .22), 5-year EFS (7% versus 8%; P = .53), disease-free survival (DFS; 13% versus 17%; P = .06) nor overall survival (OS; 10% in both arms; P = .52) were significantly improved in the PSC-833 arm. An integrated P-gp score (IPS) was determined based on P-gp function and P-gp expression in AML cells obtained prior to treatment. A higher IPS was associated with a significantly lower CR rate and worse EFS and OS. There was no significant interaction between IPS and treatment arm with respect to CR rate and survival, indicating also a lack of benefit of PSC-833 in P-gp-positive patients. The role of strategies aimed at inhibitory P-gp and other drug-resistance mechanisms continues to be defined in the treatment of patients with AML.     

自体外周血造血干细胞移植治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤182例临床分析

目的　评价自体外周血造血干细胞移植 (APBSCT)治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤 (NHL)患者的疗效。方法　全国 34家单位采用APBSCT治疗NHL 182例。其中第一次完全缓解 (CR1)移植 112例 ,部分缓解 (PR)或复发期移植 70例。外周血造血干细胞 (APBSC)动员方案分为四组 :1组为大剂量环磷酰胺 (HD CY)联合粒细胞 集落刺激因子 (G CSF) 5 5例 ;2组为大剂量阿糖胞苷 (HD Ara C)联合G CSF7例 ;3组为增大环磷酰胺剂量的针对性化疗方案联合G CSF 10 2例 ;4组为单独应用G CSF 18例。预处理方案 :移植前处于CR1状态的 112例中 ,含有全身照射 (TBI)的预处理方案 39例 ,不含TBI的 73例 ;PR或复发的 70例中 ,含有TBI的预处理方案 2 9例 ,不含TBI的 4 1例。结果　四组所采集到的APBSC均可达到临床所需数量。四组间采集的单个核细胞数与采集次数之间无统计学差别。移植后WBC≥ 1 0× 10 9/L的中位数时间为 12 (10～ 30 )d ;血小板≥ 2 0× 10 9/L的中位数时间为 12 (0～ 181)d。患者移植后平均随访时间为 2 4个月。预期 3年无病生存率 (DFS)移植前达CR1期者 6 9 7% ;PR和复发期为 4 4 9%。在移植前达CR1期患者中 ,含有TBI和不含TBI的预处理方案的 3年DFS无统计学差别 (70 1%、6 8 0 % )。而对于PR或复发期患者 ,前者优于后者 (5 7     

Standard induction and low dose ara-C treatment in patients over 60 with AML or MDS

In this retrospective study, 61 induction treatment periods in 57 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were evaluated. According to the WHO performance status, 6 patients received no chemotherapy, 20 had low dose cytosine arabinoside (LD ara-C) induction courses, and 35 received standard induction consisting of daunorubicin and cytosine arabinoside. Untreated patients had a poor survival. Of the 20 patients with LD ara-C induction courses, 4 (20%) achieved complete remission (CR). Three patients (15%) died during induction. Of 35 patients with standard induction, 21 patients (60%) achieved CR. Toxicity was considerable - 11 patients (31%) dying during treatment. We conclude that patients over 60 yr of age with RAEB, RAEB-t or AML had a CR rate and survival comparable to those of younger patients if treated with standard induction chemotherapy at the cost of serious therapy-related complications. In patients who were judged not to be able to tolerate standard induction and who were subsequently treated with LD ara-C, complications occurred less frequently, but the CR rate was low and survival short.