In vitro comparison of coronal microleakage between Resilon alone and gutta-percha with a glass-ionomer intraorifice barrier using a fluid filtration model

The prevention and control of coronal microleakage is critical for successful endodontic outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare coronal microleakage between Resilon alone and gutta-percha with a glass ionomer intraorifice barrier using a fluid filtration model. Thirty-four extracted human teeth were decoronated, prepared to a standardized length of 16 mm, and instrumented to a .06 taper ISO size 40. After removal of controls, the remaining roots were randomly divided into two equal groups of 15 and obturated with either Resilon alone or gutta-percha with a 2-mm glass-ionomer intraorifice barrier. After set of the sealers, the teeth were evaluated for microleakage using a fluid filtration model. A Student t test found significantly less leakage for the gutta-percha/glass-ionomer intraorifice barrier group than the Resilon alone group (p = 0.008).     

A fluid filtration comparison of gutta-percha versus Resilon, a new soft resin endodontic obturation system

The purpose of this study was to compare the sealing ability of gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer versus Resilon and Epiphany Resin Root Canal sealer using three different final irrigants with the fluid filtration model. There were 140 teeth prepared using a crown-down method to a size 50 file. The teeth were randomly divided into two groups: (A) GP and AH Plus and (B) Resilon and Epiphany. After removal of the smear layer each group was irrigated with either 5.25% NaOCl, 0.012% chlorhexidine (CHX), or 2% CHX for 10 minutes. Obturation was performed using the continuous wave of condensation. The teeth were stored for 20 days in 100% humidity before testing. Two-way ANOVA analysis indicated significantly less leakage (p < 0.05) using Resilon with Epiphany sealer compared to gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer. There was no statistical significance between any of the irrigants used for either obturation group.     

An in vitro comparison of the intraradicular dentin bond strength of Resilon and gutta-percha

The purpose of this study was to compare the micropush-out bond strength of Resilon to that of gutta-percha. Extracted human anterior teeth were used for evaluation. The crowns were removed and the root canals were instrumented with Gates Glidden drills and 0.06 Profile rotary files. Instrumentation was performed with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite irrigation and a final rinse of 17% EDTA. The teeth were randomly divided into two groups. Gutta-percha group: obturation with gutta-percha and Kerr Pulp Canal Sealer EWT. Resilon group: obturation with Resilon points, Epiphany Primer, and Root Canal Sealant. The teeth were cut perpendicular to their long axis to obtain a series of 1.0 mm thick disks (n = 15 per group). Micropush-out bond strengths to root canal dentin were measured. The results show that the mean bond strength to root canal dentin was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the Resilon/Epiphany group as compared to the gutta-percha/Kerr Pulp Canal Sealer EWT group.     

Active versus passive microleakage of Resilon/Epiphany and gutta-percha/AH Plus

The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the active versus passive dye microleakage and apical sealing ability of laterally condensed gutta-percha/AH Plus versus Resilon/Epiphany. One hundred and twenty teeth were instrumented and divided into experimental, positive and negative control groups. In group 1, the teeth were obturated with gutta-percha/AH Plus and in group 2 the teeth were obturated with Resilon/Epiphany. The apical seal was evaluated with a passive and active dye penetration test. Absorbance of the extracted dye was determined with a spectrophotometer. Resilon/Epiphany showed less dye penetration in comparison with the gutta-percha/AH Plus group (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the passive and active dye penetration tests (P > 0.05). In this in vitro study, canals obturated with Resilon/Epiphany showed less apical leakage than those obturated with gutta-percha/AH Plus, regardless of the type of dye penetration test used.     

A comparison of cohesive strength and stiffness of Resilon and gutta-percha

The purpose of this study was to compare the cohesive strength and stiffness of Resilon and gutta-percha under dry conditions and after 1 month of water storage to determine if they are stiff enough to reinforce roots. Dog-bone shaped specimens were created and pulled to failure at 3 mm/min in a Vitrodyne universal tester. The apparent modulus of elasticity, percent elongation, and yield stress were measured. Cohesive strength was defined as the yield stress. The data were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA for each outcome (alpha = 0.05). The results of this study show that the cohesive strength (that is the tensile stress when they begin to flow or break) and modulus of elasticity (or stiffness) of gutta-percha and Resilon are relatively low. Although the results showed statistically significant differences between the physical properties of gutta-percha and Resilon under varied conditions, these differences were not clinically significant. In conclusion, the stiffness of Resilon and gutta-percha is too low to reinforce roots after root canal therapy.     

In vitro resistance to fracture of roots obturated with Resilon or gutta-percha

Introduction

There have been varied results from studies comparing postendodontic fracture resistance between teeth obturated with Resilon or gutta-percha. This study was performed to evaluate the fracture resistance of roots obturated by using Resilon (RealSeal sy-stem) or gutta-percha (with AH Plus sealer).

Methods

Eighty extracted human mandibular single-rooted premolars stored in 10% formalin were used in the study. They were prepared by using a crown-down technique, debrided with NaOCl, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and sterile water and divided into 4 groups. Obturation was performed by using the lateral condensation method. The negative control group consisted of unfilled specimens, and the positive control group consisted of those obturated with flowable, dual-cure composite resin. All root specimens were stored for 2 weeks in 100% humidity to allow complete setting of the sealer. Each specimen was mounted in acrylic in a polyvinyl ring and tested for fracture resistance with the Universal testing machine. The loading fixture of the machine was mounted with its spherical tip aligned with the center of the canal opening of each root. A vertical loading force was applied until it fractured the root. The force values were subjected to statistical analysis including analysis of variance and Fisher least significant difference testing.

Results

Teeth obturated with Resilon were more resistant to fracture than those obturated with gutta-percha. The difference was found to be highly significant (P = .00001).

Conclusions

Resilon increased the resistance to fracture of single-rooted teeth in vitro.     

A comparison of gutta-percha and Resilon in the obturation of lateral grooves and depressions

The purpose of this study was to compare the flow of gutta-percha and Resilon (RealSeal; SybronEndo, Orange, CA) into lateral grooves and depressions in the apical 7 mm of a root canal by using warm vertical compaction. A split-tooth model was constructed with lateral grooves and depressions prepared at 1, 3, 5, and 7 mm from working length (WL). Groups A, B, and C were obturated with gutta-percha with a System B plugger placed 5 mm, 4 mm, and 3 mm from WL. Groups D, E, and F were obturated with Resilon with a System B plugger placed 5 mm, 4 mm, or 3 mm from WL. Gutta-percha and Resilon showed similar movement into lateral grooves and dentin depressions, with a significant difference found only with increased flow of gutta-percha into depressions at the 1-mm level when the System B plugger was placed 3 mm or 4 mm from WL (p 相似文献   

A comparison of thermal properties between gutta-percha and a synthetic polymer based root canal filling material (Resilon)

A new polymer-based obturating material, Resilon, has been developed but there have been no studies identifying its thermal properties. The purpose of this study was to compare the melting point, specific heat, enthalpy change with melting and heat transfer between gutta-percha (GP) and Resilon (R). The first three tests were determined using a differential scanning calorimeter and the heat transfer test was determined using a split-tooth model. Results show no significant difference (t test, p > 0.05) between gutta-percha and Resilon for the melting point temperature (GP: 60.01 degrees C; R: 60.57 degrees C). There was a significant difference (t test, p < 0.05) in specific heat capacity (GP: 0.94 J/g degrees C, R: 1.15 J/g degrees C) and endothermic enthalpy change (GP: 10.88 J/g, R: 25.20 J/g) between the two materials. The heat transfer test showed a significant difference (Mann-Whitney, p < 0.05) in temperature increase between gutta-percha and Resilon within 3 mm of the heat source.     

The comparison of gutta-percha and Resilon penetration into lateral canals with different thermoplastic delivery systems

The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of Obtura II (Obtura Spartan, Fenton, MO) and Calamus (Densply, Tulsa, OK) to fill artificially created lateral canals in simulated plastic teeth using standard gutta-percha, Flow 150 gutta-percha (Obtura Spartan, Fenton, MO), and Resilon (Resilon Research, LLC, North Branford, CT). Lateral canals were created at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 mm from the apex in plastic teeth. The teeth were divided into eight groups. In group 1, teeth were filled with a single increment of Calamus; in group 2, canals were filled with Calamus in three increments. In group 3, Obtura II was used with a single increment of standard gutta-percha, whereas in group 4 Obtura II was used in three increments. Groups 5 and 6 were similarly filled as in the preceding groups. A multiple-comparison analysis of variance test followed by a Tukey post-hoc test were used to compare filling material penetration into the lateral canals and the experimental groups (p < 0.05). The results indicated that the flow of the filling material into lateral canals is a function of the viscoelastic properties of the filling material rather than the mechanical properties of the delivery systems. Our data also suggest that the Resilon filling material flows better into lateral canals when a single backfill technique is used.     

An in vitro comparison of thermoplasticised gutta-percha obturation techniques with cold lateral condensation

Abstract— This study compared the apical sealing ability, obturation time and extrusion of gutta-percha and sealer when root canals were ohturated using either cold lateral condensation or one of the three methods using thermoplasticised gutta-percha (Alpha Seal, Thermafil or JS Quick Fill) in vitro . One hundred and thirty-one root canals from 78 extracted human teeth were used; 116 canals were divided into five groups so that they were balanced with respect to prepared canal anatomy, and the remaining 15 canals were used as positive and negative controls. The canals in the first four groups were prepared with hand files using the step-down technique to a standard apical size and flare. The last group was prepared using engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium files (McSpad-den) to a similar apical size and Hare. One of the four obturating techniques was used to fill the canals in each of the first four groups. The fifth group was obturated using the Alpha Seal technique. The roots were immersed in india ink, demineralised and rendered transparent to assess the extent of maximum linear dye penetration. The Alpha Seal groups had the highest number of specimens without any leakage. There was a significant difference in the proportions of specimens that did not leak when the Alpha Seal ( P <0.01) and cold lateral condensation groups ( P <0.05) were compared with JS Quick Fill. Cold lateral condensation had a higher proportion of specimens with leakage in canals with curvature greater than 20' than in canals with curvatures less than 20 ( P <0.05). The curvature of canals had no effect on the sealing ability of the other techniques. The method of canal preparation had no effect on the sealing ability of Alpha Seal. Alpha Seal, Thermafil andJS Quick Fill were significantly quicker to perform than cold lateral condensation.     

Interfacial strength of Resilon and gutta-percha to intraradicular dentin

Strengthening of Resilon-filled roots via an adhesive interface should be reflected by improvement in the interfacial strength and dislocation resistance between the root fillings and intraradicular dentin. This study compared the interfacial strengths of Resilon/Epiphany and gutta-percha/AH Plus using a thin-slice push-out test design. Failure modes of root slices after push-out testing were examined with environmental scanning electron microscopy. The gutta-percha group exhibited significantly higher interfacial strength than the Resilon group, when premature failures that occurred in Resilon root slices were included in the statistical analysis. The gutta-percha root slices failed exclusively along the gutta-percha/sealer interface. The Resilon root slices failed predominantly along the sealer/dentin interface with recognizable, fractured resin tags. Detachment of the Resilon from the Epiphany sealer was also surprisingly observed in some specimens. The similarly low interfacial strengths achieved with both types of root filling challenges the concept of strengthening root-filled teeth with the new endodontic material.     

A microleakage study of gutta-percha/AH Plus and Resilon/Real self-etch systems after different irrigation protocols

The development and maintenance of the sealing of the root canal system is the key to the success of root canal treatment. The resin-based adhesive material has the potential to reduce the microleakage of the root canal because of its adhesive properties and penetration into dentinal walls. Moreover, the irrigation protocols may have an influence on the adhesiveness of resin-based sealers to root dentin.

Objective

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of different irrigant protocols on coronal bacterial microleakage of gutta-percha/AH Plus and Resilon/Real Seal Self-etch systems.

Material and Methods

One hundred ninety pre-molars were used. The teeth were divided into 18 experimental groups according to the irrigation protocols and filling materials used. The protocols used were: distilled water; sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl)+eDTA; NaOCl+H₃PO₄; NaOCl+eDTA+chlorhexidine (CHX); NaOCl+H₃PO₄+CHX; CHX+eDTA; CHX+ H₃PO₄; CHX+eDTA+CHX and CHX+H₃PO₄+CHX. Gutta-percha/AH Plus or Resilon/Real Seal Se were used as root-filling materials. The coronal microleakage was evaluated for 90 days against Enterococcus faecalis. Data were statistically analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival test, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests.

Results

No significant difference was verified in the groups using chlorhexidine or sodium hypochlorite during the chemo-mechanical preparation followed by eDTA or phosphoric acid for smear layer removal. The same results were found for filling materials. However, the statistical analyses revealed that a final flush with 2% chlorhexidine reduced significantly the coronal microleakage.

Conclusion

A final flush with 2% chlorhexidine after smear layer removal reduces coronal microleakage of teeth filled with gutta-percha/AH Plus or Resilon/Real Seal SE.     

Evaluation of microleakage of roots filled with different techniques with a computerized fluid filtration technique

The aim of this study was to compare the apical leakage of roots filled with different materials using a computerized fluid filtration technique. There were 36 freshly extracted human maxillary central incisors selected. After preparation and irrigation, 3 experimental groups of 10 roots were constituted. Ten roots were filled with AH Plus and gutta-percha, 10 roots were filled with Sealapex and gutta-percha, and 10 roots were filled with Epiphany sealer and Resilon cone using a single cone technique. Three roots were used as a positive control and three roots were used as a negative control group. Evaluation of the apical leakages was performed with a computerized fluid filtration technique. According to the results, the difference between group 3 and 1 and group 3 and 2 was statistically significant (p<0.05). Although group 2 leaked the most, there was no significant difference between group 1 and 2.     

Evaluation of the thermoplasticity of different gutta-percha cones and Resilon

The goal of this study was to evaluate the thermoplasticity of conventional and thermoplastic gutta-percha and Resilon, a polyester polymer-based material. Specimens with standardised dimensions were made from the following materials: conventional and thermoplastic gutta-percha (Dentsply), conventional and thermoplastic gutta-percha (Endopoints) and Resilon. After 24 h, the specimens were placed in water at 70 degrees C for 60 s, and thereafter positioned between two glass slabs. Each set was compressed by a 5-kg weight. Digital images of the specimens before and after compression were obtained and analysed. The thermoplasticity of each material was confirmed by the difference between final and initial areas of each sample. The data were analysed statistically by anova and Tukey's test at a 5% significance level. Resilon had the highest thermoplasticity means (P < 0.05). Among the gutta-percha cones, Endopoints TP (thermoplastic) presented the highest thermoplasticity means and differed significantly from the other commercial brands (P < 0.05). Resilon had good thermoplasticity, endorsing its use as a thermoplastic root canal filling material.     

Residual effects and surface alterations in disinfected gutta-percha and Resilon cones

The aim of this study was to evaluate alterations on the surface of gutta-percha and Resilon cones when exposed to 2% chlorhexidine gel (CHX) and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and to evaluate their possible antibacterial residual effects against Enterococcus faecalis and Porphyromonas gingivalis. A total of 270 medium tapered cones (135 gutta-percha and 135 Resilon) were selected and divided into three groups, according to the substance (NaOCl, CHX, and sterile saline solution). The cones were immersed in each substance (for 1, 5, 10, 20, and 30 min), rinsed in saline solution, and dried. They were placed onto inoculated agar plates and incubated under specific conditions. Scanning electron microscopy analysis was performed on additional 270 disinfected cones. Another 18 cones were used as controls. Based on the results, it was concluded that Resilon cones exposed to CHX for 10, 20, and 30 min demonstrated residual antibacterial action and that substances did not cause alterations to the cones' surface.     

Cytotoxicity of Epiphany and Resilon with a root model

AIM: To record the cytotoxicity of Resilon and Epiphany (Pentron clinical technologies, Wallingford, CT, USA) using a root model. METHODOLOGY: Thirty teeth with single roots were sectioned at the enamel-cementum junction, the root canals prepared and each root then sterilized before filling with the lateral condensation technique using one of three filling materials (n = 10 per group): Resilon and Epiphany, Sealite (Septodont, Pierre Rolland, Merignac, France) and gutta-percha, Roekoseal Automix (Coltène/Whaledent, Langenau, Germany) and gutta-percha. The roots were stored at 37 degrees C in an incubator to allow for setting of the root filling materials. The apices of the roots were dipped in 1 mL of MEM culture medium for 1, 2, 7 and 30 days renewing the medium every day. After 24 h contact between the medium and the filled roots, the medium was used to measure the cytotoxicity on mouse fibroblasts L 929 with the MTT assay that recorded the mitochondrial activity of the target cells. An additional test according to ISO 10993-5 standards was undertaken to compare Resilon and Epiphany. RESULTS: The root model showed no statistically significant differences between the sealers at 7 and 30 days (NS). Epiphany and Resilon were the most cytotoxic materials at 1 and 2 days (P < 0.001). Unlike Epiphany, Resilon was not cytotoxic when tested according to ISO 10993-5 standards. CONCLUSIONS: The cytotoxicity of Resilon + Epiphany, due mainly to Epiphany, decreased after 2 days to reach a level comparable with commonly used root canal sealers.     

An in vitro assessment of iodoform gutta-percha

The purpose of this study was to test the ability of a commercially available iodoform gutta-percha, to delay infiltration of Enterococcus faecalis using a microleakage model. Seventy extracted single-rooted teeth were decoronated and biomechanically prepared using hand and rotary instruments. Thirty roots were obturated laterally with iodoform gutta-percha and another 30 with regular gutta-percha. Both groups were suspended in sterile BHI broth. An inoculum of E. faecalis suspension was placed at the coronal end of each root, incubated and replenished daily. The apical broth was observed for turbidity, indicating bacterial microleakage. Samples were observed for 32 days, and data was analyzed to compare microleakage between the two groups. The results showed no significant difference between the iodoform and regular gutta-percha samples in delaying microleakage of E. faecalis (p > 0.05).     

Contamination of gutta-percha and Resilon cones taken directly from the manufacturer

Any substance and material placed in the root canal either temporarily or definitively must be free of microbial contamination. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the percentage of contamination of Resilon cones, a polycaprolactone-based material, and seven different brands of gutta-percha cones available in the specialized market. Cones were removed from their original manufacturer boxes and immediately transferred to tubes containing thioglycolate broth. Tests were carried out in triplicate. In addition, for quantitative analysis of possible contaminants, cones were taken from their packages, transferred to tubes containing saline solution, agitated, and aliquots of this solution were seeded onto Mueller-Hinton agar plates. No sample showed contamination in any of the tests performed. Despite the absence of detectable contamination before the first use, a rationale for routinely disinfecting cones before placing them into root canals is given.     

Comparison of the area of resin-based sealer and voids in roots obturated with Resilon and gutta-percha

The aim of this study was to compare the cross-sectional area of sealer plus voids of Epiphany sealer surrounding root fillings completed with Resilon cones and laterally compacted gutta-percha. The root canals of extracted human mandibular premolars were prepared to a final size of 40 (0.06 taper). The teeth were then randomly assigned into 2 groups (n = 12/group) for the filling procedures in conjunction with Epiphany sealer: group 1, Resilon cones, and group 2, gutta-percha. Horizontal sections were obtained every 1 mm up to 5 mm from the apical foramen. The sections were digitally photographed under magnification, and the cross-sectional area of the root canal and the area occupied by the sealer and voids were calculated, after which statistical comparisons were made. No differences were found between the sealer plus void or void area of Resilon or gutta-percha groups at any level of sectioning (P > .05). Comparisons within each obturation group showed that there was no significant difference between any level of sectioning with regard to the ratio of sealer plus void area or void area to that of the root canal (P > .05). Within the experimental conditions of the present study, both obturating techniques with the Epiphany sealer exhibited similar amounts of sealer and void area, regardless of the apical level of sectioning compared.