Insulin detemir improves glycemic control and reduces hypoglycemia in children with type 1 diabetes: findings from the Turkish cohort of the PREDICTIVE™ observational study

Background: Insulin detemir is a basal insulin analog designed to produce a superior pharmacokinetic profile to basal formulations of human insulin. It has shown consistently improved tolerability in comparison to neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin in adult cohorts, but there are relatively few publications involving pediatric cohorts. Methods: The efficacy and safety of insulin detemir in children with type 1 diabetes was assessed using data from the Turkish cohort of PREDICTIVE? (a large, multinational, observational) study. The children investigated were using basal–bolus therapy involving NPH insulin or insulin glargine at baseline but were switched to insulin detemir as part of routine clinical care by their physicians. Results: Twelve weeks of treatment with insulin detemir significantly reduced mean hemoglobin A1c (9.7–8.9%, p < 0.001) and mean fasting glucose [185–162 mg/dL (10.3–9 mmol/L), p < 0.01]. Fasting glucose variability was also lower after treatment with insulin detemir than previously (on either NPH or glargine, p < 0.05). The frequencies of total, major and nocturnal hypoglycemic events were significantly reduced with insulin detemir relative to baseline, with an estimated mean of 6.89 fewer events/patient/yr overall (p < 0.001) and 2.6 fewer nocturnal events/patient/yr (p < 0.01). Weight and insulin dose remained relatively unchanged. Conclusions: Twelve weeks of treatment with insulin detemir improved glycemic control and reduced hypoglycemia in children with type 1 diabetes. This improved tolerability might allow further dose titration and therefore additional improvements in glucose control.     

Usefulness of insulin detemir in Japanese children with type 1 diabetes

Background: This multicenter observational study was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of insulin detemir (detemir) for diabetes management in Japanese children and adolescents. Methods: Data from the Japanese Study Group of Insulin Therapy for Childhood and Adolescent Diabetes database were analyzed. Ninety children (32 boys, 58 girls; mean age, 11.9 ± 3.8 years) who transferred from a neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin or insulin glargine basal‐bolus regimen to detemir basal‐bolus therapy and who were observed for at least 12 months were identified. Clinical data obtained at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months were analyzed to determine the type of bolus insulin used, number and timing of detemir injections, detemir dose as a proportion of the total insulin dose, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose (FBG) and frequency of severe hypoglycemia. Results: Twelve months after switching to detemir, the detemir dose represented 39.8% of the total insulin dose, and 37.8% of patients were being treated with twice‐daily injections. HbA1c and FBG were significantly reduced from baseline at 3 and 6 months but not at 12 months. Considering the seasonal HbA1c variation in the Japanese population, a separate analysis was performed using data for 65 children (21 boys, 44 girls; mean age, 11.6 ± 2.9 years) who switched to detemir during the winter. Subset analysis showed significant HbA1c reductions from baseline at all specified times. The incidence of severe hypoglycemia during detemir treatment was 4.4 episodes per 100 patient‐years. Conclusions: Detemir is an effective and safe basal insulin for diabetes management in Japanese children and adolescents.     

Variables associated with severe hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a population‐based study

Blasetti A, Di Giulio C, Tocco AM, Verrotti A, Tumini S, Chiarelli F, Altobelli E. Variables associated with severe hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a population‐based study. Objective: Hypoglycemia remains a central problem in the management of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and limits the achievement of good or normal glycemic control. The Diabetes Control and Complication Trial showed that intensive treatment of T1DM increased the risk of severe hypoglycemia (SH) when compared to conventional therapy. The aim of our study was to determine the incidence of SH and associated variables in a population of children and adolescents with T1DM. Research design and methods: We performed a 7.5‐yr prospective study enrolling 195 patients aged 13.9 ± 6.6 yr. The study was carried out by referring to the T1DM population‐based register in the Abruzzo region of Italy. The incidence of SH, defined as blood glucose levels <50 mg/dL (<2.77 mmol/L) associated with altered states of consciousness (including confusional state, seizures, and coma) was recorded. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) percentage, insulin dose, insulin regimen, time since diagnosis, and age at onset were also recorded. Results: One hundred and thirty‐three severe hypoglycemic events occurred during the study period; the overall incidence was 9.4 episodes per 100 patient‐years. Significant predictors of hypoglycemia were diabetes duration >10 yr (p = 0.01), basal/bolus insulin ratio (ratio of daily basal insulin units to daily bolus insulin units) >0.8 (p = 0.01). No relationship was found between hypoglycemic episodes and HbA1c levels, daily insulin requirements, or insulin regimen. Conclusions: In these patients, a relatively low incidence of SH was recorded, without pronounced association with lower HbA1c or multiple daily injection insulin therapy. SH seems to be mainly related to management of diabetes. We believe that the main path to SH prevention is through patient and family education in the management of T1DM.     

Treatment with insulin glargine reduces asymptomatic hypoglycemia detected by continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVE: Unsatisfactory basal insulin substitution may lead to asymptomatic hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). To investigate the effects of multiple daily injections before and after changing to insulin glargine (IG), continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) data were used to analyze glycemic control and hypoglycemic episodes during the two different therapy regimens. METHODS: Basal insulin therapy was changed to one daily injection of IG in 30 pediatric patients with T1D (14 boys and 16 girls; age 4.5-18.3 yr, median 14.2 yr; diabetes duration 0.5-15.6 yr, median 4.6 yr) having elevated fasting glucose or recurrent hypoglycemia despite treatment with multiple injection therapy (basal insulin: two to four injections of neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) and/or zinc lente insulin). Ambulatory CGMS was applied before and 6-8 wk after treatment change. Frequency of hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic episodes, glucose area under the curve (AUC), and time below 60 mg/dL and above 180 mg/dL, respectively, were calculated from CGMS data during the day (8:00-22:00 hours) and at night (22:00-8:00 hours). RESULTS: Nocturnal hypoglycemia was detected by CGMS in 20 patients before and in 12 patients after the change to IG (p = .039), whereas both, the number of nocturnal and diurnal hypoglycemic episodes, decreased not significantly from 41 to 36 (p = .758) and 48 to 28 (p = .055), respectively. AUC and time below 60 mg/dL as well as hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) were not significantly different before and after the change to IG. CONCLUSION: Under treatment with IG, asymptomatic hypoglycemia was reduced without increase of HbA1c.     

Initial insulin therapy in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus

Weitzel D, Pfeffer U, Dost A, Herbst A, Knerr I, Holl R. Initial insulin therapy in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Objective: The aim of the study was to define parameters that influence the initial insulin dosage in young subjects with type 1 diabetes regarding the amount of daily insulin, the ratios of basal and prandial insulin, and the insulin/carbohydrate ratios. Study design: We used a computer‐based registry (with prospectively collected data) in Germany and Austria, a software for the management and data documentation of diabetic patients (DPV), to analyze the initial insulin therapy in 2247 children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes to identify factors that influence diabetes therapy within the first 10 d. Results: For both genders, glucosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), blood pH at diabetes onset, and pubertal status are the major factors determining the initial insulin dosage calculated as the amount of daily insulin per kilogram body weight (kg), the basal and prandial insulin dose per kilogram, and day and the insulin/carbohydrate ratios for meals. The frequency of hypoglycemia correlated with increasing quotient of applied to calculated insulin dosage. Conclusion: The predictive factors of insulin requirement may exert beneficial effects on the assessment and adjustment of insulin therapy in young diabetic subjects at disease onset. On the basis of a multiple, linear regression, we suggest a formula to calculate the initial insulin therapy.     

A multicenter observational safety study in Swedish children and adolescents using insulin detemir for the treatment of type 1 diabetes

This 26‐wk observational study in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in Sweden investigated the safety and efficacy of insulin detemir (IDet) in newly diagnosed (ND) patients and those with established diabetes (ED) switching to IDet. A total of 159 patients initiated IDet as part of basal–bolus therapy, 59 in the ND stratum (mean age 9.7 yr) and 97 in the ED stratum (mean age 12.5 yr). The primary outcome measure was the incidence of severe adverse drug reactions; just one major hypoglycemic event occurred in a patient in the ND stratum during the study and one patient was withdrawn due to injection‐site reactions. All other events were classified as mild. In the ED stratum, there was a reduction in hypoglycemic events in the 4 wk prior to study end from baseline (mean reduction of 2.46 events, not significant) and a significant reduction in nocturnal hypoglycemia (mean reduction of 2.24 events, p = 0.0078). Glycemic control improved in the ND stratum as expected and, in the ED stratum, there was no significant change in HbA1c from baseline (mean reduction of ?0.45%). At study end, mean daily IDet doses were 0.39 U/kg (ND) and 0.54 U/kg (ED). Weight increased by 5.7 and 2.0 kg in the ND and ED strata, respectively, and was within the normal limits for growing children. IDet provided good glycemic control and was well tolerated, with a reduced risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia in a heterogeneous cohort of children and adolescents with T1D.     

A prospective study of severe hypoglycemia and long-term spatial memory in children with type 1 diabetes

In a previous retrospective study, severe hypoglycemia (SH) was associated with decreased long-term spatial memory in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). In this study, we tested the hypothesis that prospectively ascertained SH would also be associated with decreased spatial long-term memory over time. Children with T1DM (n = 42) and sibling controls (n = 25) performed a spatial delayed response (SDR) task with short and long delays and other neuropsychological tests at baseline and after 15 months of monitoring. Extreme glycemic events and other medical complications were recorded prospectively during follow-up. Fourteen T1DM children experienced at least one episode of SH during the follow-up period (range = 1-5). After controlling for long-delay SDR performance at baseline, age, gender, and age of onset, the presence of SH during the prospective period was statistically associated with decreased long-delay SDR performance at follow-up (semipartial r = -0.38, p = 0.017). This relationship was not seen with short-delay SDR or with verbal or object memory, attention, or motor speed. These results, together with previously reported data, support the hypothesis that SH has specific, negative effects on spatial memory skills in T1DM children.     

Insulin detemir is characterized by a more reproducible pharmacokinetic profile than insulin glargine in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: results from a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

Insulin detemir (detemir) has previously been shown to be associated with lower within-subject variability compared with other basal insulin preparations in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). This randomized, double-blind, crossover trial compared the within-subject variability of detemir and insulin glargine (glargine) in pharmacokinetic properties in children and adolescents with T1DM. The trial enrolled 32 children and adolescents (19 girls and 13 boys; mean +/- SD: age 13 +/- 2.5 yr and T1DM duration 6.3 +/- 3.0 yr) with a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 7.9 +/- 1.0%. Participants were randomized to a specific treatment sequence in which a dose of 0.4 U/kg of detemir and glargine was injected subcutaneously 24 h apart at each of two dosing visits. Insulin concentrations were measured at frequent intervals for a period of 16-h post-dosing. Detemir showed statistically significantly less within-subject variability compared with glargine with a 3.1-fold and 2.9-fold lower coefficient of variation (CV, %) for the area under the concentration-time curve [AUC((0-16) (h))] and the maximum concentration (C(max)), respectively. Separate analyses demonstrated a 2.5-fold and 2.9-fold lower CV (%) with detemir in children (8-12 yr) and a 4-fold and 3.8-fold lower CV (%) with detemir in adolescents (13-17 yr). No safety concerns were raised during the trial. In conclusion, within-subject variability in pharmacokinetic properties was significantly lower for detemir than for glargine in children and adolescents with T1DM. This indicates a less variable absorption with detemir, which is expected to be associated with a more predictable therapeutic effect also in this population.     

Prevalence of intentional under- and overdosing of insulin in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes

Schober E, Wagner G, Berger G, Gerber D, Mengl M, Sonnenstatter S, Barrientos I, Rami B, Karwautz A, Fritsch M, on behalf of the Austrian Diabetic Incidence Study Group. Prevalence of intentional under‐ and overdosing of insulin in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of insulin under‐ and overdosing in paediatric patients. Research design and methods: Cross‐sectional study including 241 patients (age 14.0 + 2.7 yr, 42.5% males) with type 1 diabetes from 21 diabetic outpatient clinics. Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), height, and weight were available from clinical records. Patients were interviewed with the Diabetes Self‐Management Profile (DSMP) interview. T test, U test, and chi‐squared test were used for comparison. Results: On the basis of the DSMP, 103 (42.7%) patients (group A) showed adherence to the therapeutic insulin regimen, while 71 (29.5%) patients (group B) confessed intentional over and/or under‐dosing of insulin. Sixty‐seven (27.8%) adolescents (group C) reported management problems leading to unintended inappropriate insulin dosages. In group B, 55 (22.8%) injected higher insulin doses and 58 (24.1%) omitted insulin. Patients of group B compared to group A were older 15.0 (±2.5) vs. 14.0 (±2.5) yr (p < 0.01), older at onset 9.5 (±3.6) vs. 8.3 (±3.8) yr (p = 0.05), were more often girls (69 vs. 45.6%), had a higher actual HbA1c (8.7 ± 1.7 vs. 7.8 ± 1.2%), and a higher average HbA1c in the previous year (8.3 ± 1.6 vs. 7.9 ± 1.2%) (p < 0.01). No significant differences could be found between group A and group C. Conclusion: Intentional overdosing of insulin is almost as prevalent in children and adolescents as insulin omission. Females are more at risk.     

Use of insulin glargine in children under age 6 with type 1 diabetes

AIM: Children under 6 yr have the highest incidence of severe hypoglycemia (SH) and the greatest likelihood of brain damage from SH. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of insulin glargine (Lantus in children under age 6 with type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODS: The electronic medical records were reviewed for patients under age 6 during the first 6 months of insulin glargine therapy and compared with age, sex, and duration of diabetes for matched control patients on neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin. Data from 128 subjects (32 male pairs and 32 female pairs) were collected relating to the incidence of severe and non-severe hypoglycemic events, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values, body mass index (BMI), and daily insulin dose. Additionally, parents were asked to complete a diabetes Quality of Life (QoL) survey. RESULTS: In the 6 months before the study period, the glargine group had 16 SH events compared with three in the 6 months post-glargine. The comparison (NPH) group had seven and six SH events in their respective 6-month periods. Nighttime SH events in the glargine group decreased from 12 prestudy events to one during the study period. The average daily insulin dose in the glargine group was higher than that in the NPH group (0.8+/- 0.2 vs. 0.7+/- 0.2 U/kg/day; p=0.03). The HbA1c values, BMI, and QoL responses were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: SH was decreased, particularly at night (from 12 episodes to one), after the introduction of glargine in young children with T1D.     

Characteristics of glycemic control in young children with type 1 diabetes

Abtract: Background: The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) demonstrated that the rate-limiting step to the intensification of diabetes management in adolescents and adults was hypoglycemia. Young children were presumed to be at even greater risk for hypoglycemia with severe consequences, particularly if they had HbA1c levels < 8%.
Subjects: A retrospective chart review was performed on 148 patients with type 1 diabetes on insulin injection therapy who were < 8 yr of age (mean age 5.7 ± 1.5, mean diabetes duration 3.0 ± 1.4 yr) followed quarterly from July 1999 to June 2001.
Methods:  The subjects were divided into two groups based on their mean HbA1c values (< 8 vs. ≥ 8%) averaged over the 2-yr time period. The following variables were analyzed comparing the two groups: age, duration of diabetes, insulin dose, severe hypoglycemic episodes, episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), percentage of glucose levels above, within, and below the target range, and number of diabetes home-management competencies obtained.
Results:  Patients with HbA1c < 8% spent more time within target range (40.0 vs. 29.5%, p = 0.0001) and less time above their target range (36.9 vs. 51.2%, p = 0.0003). There was no difference in the percentage of glucose levels below target (23.2 vs. 19.4%, p = NS), percentage of severe hypoglycemic episodes (3 vs. 7 episodes per 100 patient-yr, p = NS), or episodes of DKA (1 vs. 3 episodes per 100 patient-yr, p = NS) between the two groups. Subjects with lower HbA1c levels had acquired more home-management competencies (4.0 vs. 3.5, p = 0.01).
Conclusions:  If families are competent in fundamental diabetes management, young children can achieve HbA1c levels < 8.0% without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia.     

The effectiveness of glucose,sucrose, and fructose in treating hypoglycemia in children with type 1 diabetes

Husband AC, Crawford S, McCoy LA, Pacaud D. The effectiveness of glucose, sucrose, and fructose in treating hypoglycemia in children with type 1 diabetes. Objective: There is a lack of evidence regarding the most effective treatment option for managing naturally occurring hypoglycemia in children with type 1 diabetes. The objectives of this study were (i) to determine if sucrose and fructose are equally effective as glucose in the treatment of spontaneous hypoglycemia in children with type 1 diabetes; and (ii) to determine prestudy and poststudy hypoglycemia treatment preferences. Methods: Thirty‐three subjects [aged 5.4–15.5 yr and average duration of type 1 diabetes of 3.1 yr (SD = 2.3)] participated in a randomized, crossover design. The main outcome was the effectiveness of treatment as defined by a blood glucose meter reading that was ≥ 4.0 mmol/L 15 min after treatment. Each subject treated five hypoglycemic events with each treatment type: glucose (BD Glucose Tablets?), sucrose (Skittles?), and fructose (Fruit to Go?). Results: There was a significant difference between the effectiveness of the three treatments [Wilk's Lambda F(2,28) = 8.64, p = 0.001]. No significant difference between treatment with glucose and treatment with sucrose was noted, but the treatment effectiveness for fructose was significantly lower than sucrose [F (1,29) = 16.09, p < 0.001] and glucose [F (1,29) = 15.64, p < 0.001]. The preferred treatment choices before the study were as follows: 36% glucose, 18% sucrose, and 33% fructose sources. Poststudy, 52% of children preferred the same treatment, which was effective (glucose or sucrose), followed by 35% who changed their preference to an effective treatment. Conclusion: Skittles? are as effective in treating hypoglycemia as more expensive BD Glucose Tablets? in children with type 1 diabetes.     

Basal insulin switch from NPH to glargine in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes

Background:  Insulin glargine is a long-acting insulin analogue increasingly used instead of neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin in young subjects with type 1 diabetes.
Objective:  We evaluated the clinical course of diabetes in children and adolescents who were switched from NPH to insulin glargine.
Methods:  Between August 2003 and November 2004, a total of 76 subjects were switched to glargine in our clinic, treating 340 children with type 1 diabetes. All the subjects had been receiving insulin NPH, and their serum C-peptide levels had been non-detectable for at least 1 yr. Data were collected retrospectively, and 12–18 months after the change, experiences with glargine were inquired using a questionnaire. Seven subjects (9.2%) discontinued glargine before 12 months, and seven refused to participate.
Results:  Data for 62 subjects were analyzed. At the switch (0 months), their mean age was 12.7 yr (range 5.1–17.5), mean duration of diabetes was 6.7 yr (range 1.8–14.3), and mean hemoglobin A1c was (HbA1c) 9.2%. Twelve months later (+12 months), the mean HbA1c remained similar (9.2%), the proportion of long-acting insulin was smaller (47.7 vs. 58.1%; p < 0.001), and the daily insulin dose was lower (0.97 vs. 1.05 IU/kg; p < 0.001). The number of injections was lower at +12 months (17.7% with more than five injections vs. 64.5%; p < 0.001). No differences were seen in weight for height or the number of severe hypoglycemias. Most subjects who continued with glargine for ≥12 months considered glargine better than NPH.
Conclusions:  A switch to insulin glargine retains a similar glycemic control and does not change the number of severe hypoglycemias.     

Hypoglycemia,S‐ACE and ACE genotypes in a Danish nationwide population of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes

Johannesen J, Svensson J, Bergholdt R, Eising S, Gramstrup H, Frandsen E, Dick‐Nielsen J, Hansen L, Pociot F, Mortensen HB, The Danish Society for Diabetes in Childhood and Adolescence. Hypoglycemia, S‐ACE and ACE genotypes in a Danish nationwide population of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Objective: High S‐ACE levels have been shown to predispose to increased risk of hypoglycemia, however; some inconsistency relates to the risk of the ACE genotype. We investigated the association between S‐ACE level at diagnosis and ACE genotype to long‐term risk of severe hypoglycemia in more than 1000 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes being part of the Danish Registry of Childhood diabetes over a 10‐yr period. Research design and methods: The Registry provided annual registration of clinical data, e.g., HbA1c, blood glucose monitoring, insulin type and dosage and acute diabetic complications (hypoglycemia and DKA). A BioBank coupled to the Registry comprised serum for measuring S‐ACE levels and DNA for ACE genotyping. Results: A total of 1037 individuals were included, aged 9.97 yr (SD 3.84). A total of 622 severe hypoglycemic episodes were observed in 270 individuals. Associations to increased risk of hypoglycemia generated from a negative binominal model were long diabetes duration (p < 0.0001) and high S‐ACE level (p = 0.0497) when adjusted for ACE genotype. In the stratified analysis, S‐ACE and insulin dosage were associated with hypoglycemia in girls (p = 0.026 and 0.028, respectively). An association of S‐ACE level to ACE genotype was identified; however, no difference in the frequency of hypoglycemia, diabetes duration or HbA1c was demonstrated between ACE genotypes. Conclusion: This large nationwide cohort has identified an increased risk for hypoglycemia associated with higher S‐ACE level, however only in girls. A strong association was found between ACE genotype and S‐ACE levels, but ACE genotype was not related to risk of hypoglycemia.