Venous complications after orthotopic liver transplantation

We report venous complications, including portal vein and hepatic vein stenoses, that required interventional radiological treatment in three pediatric and two adult living related liver transplant recipients. Between April 2001 and April 2005, 81 liver transplantations were performed at our hospital. Sixty-two grafts were from living donors. During follow-up, three portal vein stenoses were identified in three pediatric recipients, and two hepatic vein stenoses in two adult patients. In the children, two had received left lateral segment grafts, and one had received a right lobe graft from two mothers and one father, respectively. The etiologies of liver failure were Alagille syndrome, biliary atresia, and fulminant Wilson's disease. Portal vein stenoses were identified at 8, 11, and 12 months after transplantation; all three patients underwent percutaneous transhepatic portal venous angioplasty with a success rate of 100%. The mean follow-up was 102 days; no recurrence has occurred. In contrast, hepatic venous stenoses were diagnosed in two adult recipients. One of them was a 24-year-old woman with autoimmune hepatitis and the other a 43-year-old man with cryptogenic cirrhosis. Hepatic vein stenoses were diagnosed at 3 and 4 months after transplantation. Both hepatic vein stenoses were dilated with balloon angioplasties via the transjugular route. Venous complications identified by Doppler ultrasonography were confirmed by computerized tomographic angiography. Angioplasty represents an effective and safe alternative to reconstructive surgery in the treatment of venous complications after liver transplantation.     

Portal vein reconstruction in adult living donor liver transplantation using cryopreserved vein grafts.

No data are available for the management of venous jump or interposition conduits for portal vein (PV) reconstruction in adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The feasibility of using cryopreserved vein grafts as PV conduits was examined. Cryopreserved vein (n = 23) was used as a patch, interposition, or jump graft. The patency results were compared with those of anastomosis without vein patch (n = 217) or those with vein autografts (n = 10). The 5-yr primary and secondary patency rates of the cryopreserved vein grafts were 58% and 79%, respectively. In conclusion, our data indicate that the use of cryopreserved vein grafts should be limited as conduits in PV reconstruction in adult LDLT.     

Hemodynamic interaction between portal vein and hepatic artery flow in small-for-size split liver transplantation

In split-liver transplantation, the entire portal flow is redirected through relatively small-for-size grafts. It has been postulated that excessive portal blood flow leads to graft injury. In order to elucidate the mechanisms of this injury, we studied the hemodynamic interactions between portal vein- and hepatic artery flow in an experimental model in pigs. Six whole pig liver grafts were implanted in Group 1 ( n=6) and six whole liver grafts were split into right and left grafts and transplanted to Groups 2 ( n=6) and 3 ( n=6), respectively. The graft-to-recipient liver volume ratio was 1:1, 2:3 and 1:3 in Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Portal vein- and hepatic artery flows were measured with an ultrasonic flow meter at 60,120 and 180 min after graft reperfusion. Portal vein pressure was also recorded at the same time intervals. Graft function was assessed at 3,6h and 12h, and morphological changes at 12h after reperfusion. Following reperfusion, portal vein flow showed an inverse relationship to graft size, while hepatic artery flow was reduced proportionately to graft size. The difference was significant among the three groups ( P<0.05). Portal vein pressure was significantly higher in group 3, compared to groups 1 and 2 ( P<0.05). Hepatic artery buffer response was significantly higher in Group 3, compared to Groups 1 and 2 in relation to pre-occlusion values ( P<0.05). Split-liver transplantation, when resulting in small-for-size grafts, is associated with portal hypertension, diminished arterial flow, and graft dysfunction. Arterial flow impairment appears to be related to increased portal vein flow.     

Outcome of extra-anatomic vascular reconstruction in orthotopic liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Portal venous and hepatic arterial reconstruction are critical to successful outcomes in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). With portal vein thrombosis or inadequate hepatic arterial inflow, extra-anatomic vascular reconstruction is required. However, the clinical outcomes following extra-anatomic vascular reconstruction are largely unknown. METHODS: To determine the outcomes associated with extra-anatomic vascular reconstruction, we performed a retrospective review of 205 OLT recipients transplanted between 1995 and 2000. RESULTS: Extra-anatomic portal venous inflow was based upon the recipient superior mesenteric vein using donor iliac vein graft in a retrogastric position (n = 12). Extra-anatomic arterial inflow was based on recipient infrarenal aorta using donor iliac artery graft through the transverse mesocolon (n = 25). OLT with routine anatomic vascular construction served as control (n = 168). Extra-anatomic vascular reconstruction was not associated with increased morbidity, mortality, operating room time, length of stay, or thrombosis. CONCLUSION: We conclude that extra-anatomic vascular conduits are associated with excellent long-term outcomes and provide acceptable alternatives for vascular reconstruction in OLT.     

Management of vascular complications after pediatric liver transplantation

Sixty-five children underwent liver transplantation (LTx) from March 1995 to December 2002. Cirrhosis due to biliary atresia was the main indication, and hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) the most common vascular complication (n = 5). Other vascular problems were portal vein thrombosis and stenosis. Another patient developed hepatomegaly and ascites due to a late stenosis of the left hepatic vein anastomosis. The two cases of venous stenosis were successfully treated by percutaneous angioplasty. One graft with HAT was saved, but four children died awaiting retransplant.     

A selective approach to preexisting portal vein thrombosis in patients undergoing liver transplantation.

Splanchnic venous inflow is considered mandatory to ensure graft survival after liver transplantation. Over a 68-month period, we performed 570 liver transplants in 495 patients. Portal vein thrombosis was present in 16 patients. At transplant, the extent of the occlusion included portal vein alone (n = 4), portal including confluence of the splenic and superior mesenteric veins (n = 8), portal, splenic, and distal superior mesenteric veins (n = 2), and the entire portal vein, splenic vein, and superior mesenteric vein (n = 2). The operative approach included thrombectomy alone (n = 5), anastomosis at the confluence of the splenic and superior mesenteric splenic veins (n = 8), and extra-anatomic venous reconstruction (n = 3). The mean operative blood loss was 22 +/- 22 units, and the mean operative time was 9.7 +/- 4.8 hours. The 1-year actuarial survival rate was 81%, with a mean follow-up of 12.5 months. In summary, with a selective approach and the use of innovative forms of splanchnic venous inflow, portal vein thrombosis is no longer a contraindication to liver transplantation.     

Interpostion vein graft in living donor liver transplantation

In adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), right lobe grafts without a middle hepatic vein can cause hepatic congestion and disturbance of venous drainage. To solve this problem, various types of interposition vein graft have been used. OBJECTIVES: We used various types of interposition vein grafts for drainage of the paramedian portion of the right lobe in living donor liver transplantation. METHODS: From June 1996 to June 2003, 37 of 176 patients (128 adults, 48 pediatric) who underwent LDLT received vein grafts for drainage of segments V, VIII, or the inferior portion of the right lobe. RESULTS: In 36 adult cases the reconstruction included the inferior mesenteric vein of the donor (n = 14); cadaveric iliac vein stored at cold (4 degrees C) temperature (n = 5); cryopreserved (-180 degrees C) cadaveric iliac vein (n = 10); cryopreserved cadaveric iliac artery (n = 1 case); donor ovarian vein (n = 1); recipient umbilical vein (n = 3); recipient saphenous vein (n = 1); recipient left portal vein (n = 1); recipient left hepatic vein (n = 1). In a pediatric case with malignant hemangioendothelioma that encased and compressed the inferior vena cava, we used an interposition vein graft to replace the inferior vena cava. CONCLUSION: Various types of interposition vein grafts can be used in living donor liver transplantation. Cryopreserved cadaveric iliac vein and artery are useful to solve these drainage problems.     

Primary Budd-Chiari syndrome: outcome of endovascular management for suprahepatic venous obstruction

OBJECTIVE: Primary Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is a rare form of hepatic venous outflow obstruction at the suprahepatic inferior vena cava (IVC), the hepatic veins, or both. We assessed our 4-year experience in the management of BCS to evaluate the results of our methods of care. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of a nonrandomized clinical trial conducted in three teaching hospitals. Among 28 primary BCS patients, 9 remained in medical treatment only, and 19 who failed to respond to medical treatment received additional endovascular (n = 17) or surgical therapy (n = 2). Nine underwent IVC balloon angioplasty alone, 6 had angioplasty plus stents, and 2 had transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) for hepatic vein lesions. One patient had a mesoatrial bypass; another had liver transplantation. Immediate response to the therapy was assessed with angiography and ultrasonography based on anatomic and/or hemodynamic correction or reduction of the lesion. Subsequent assessment of portal hypertension status was made with periodic clinical and laboratory evaluation (eg, ultrasonography, liver biopsy). RESULTS: Twenty-six patients had had IVC stenosis or occlusion by focal or segmental lesion. Two patients had hepatic vein outlet obstruction. There was no evidence of coagulopathy as the pathogenesis; all were related to membranous obstruction of the vena cava. Excellent immediate response to the endovascular therapy and subsequent relief of portal hypertension were achieved in 14 patients. Four patients had restenosis or progression of the residual lesion within 2 years; three responded to repeated stenting. Primary patency was 76.5%, and primary assisted patency was 94.1%. Two patients with TIPS and two with surgical therapy maintained excellent results. The medical treatment remained effective only in a limited group of 6 (21.4%) of the 28 patients. CONCLUSIONS: In BCS, both endovascular and surgical interventions provide excellent results and potentially halt liver parenchymal deterioration caused by portal hypertension. Liver transplantation remains the ultimate solution for advanced liver failure.     

Relief of hepatic vein stenosis by balloon angioplasty after living-related donor liver transplantation

We have experienced 5 hepatic vein stenoses in 3 children (8 to 23 months old) after living-related liver transplantation (total 48 liver transplants for 48 children between June 1990 and November 1992). The initial symptoms of hepatic vein stenosis were ascites and/or edema. The blood flow of hepatic vessels was monitored by duplex sonography. The mean velocity of the hepatic vein and the portal vein was decreased and flow wave pattern of the stenotic hepatic vein was flat. The patients were treated by percutaneous transhepatic balloon angioplasty. After a successful angioplasty, the mean velocity of the hepatic vein and portal vein increased and pulsatile waves returned to the hepatic vein. Arterial ketone body ratio (acetoacetate/3-hydroxybutylate) increased, promptly followed by recovery of other liver function tests. In 1 patient, this complication occurred three times with intervals of 7 months and 3 months between episodes of hepatic vein stenosis. In conclusion, hepatic vein flow should be monitored routinely with duplex sonography after living-related donor liver transplantation. Percutaneous transhepatic balloon angioplasty is a primary treatment for the stenosis.     

Intraoperative stent placement in the portal vein during or after liver transplantation.

The purpose of this research was to evaluate the intermediate effectiveness of intraoperative portal vein stent placement for portal venous stenosis in liver transplantation. We attempted intraoperative portal vein stent placement in 44 portal venous anastomotic stenoses in 36 patients. All patients underwent stent placement via either the inferior or superior mesenteric vein. A total of 22 patients underwent portal vein stent placement simultaneously with liver transplantation, and 14 patients underwent stent placement 1-25 days (mean 5.93 days) after liver transplantation. Of the 22 patients, there was portal vein occlusion in 3 patients and small portal vein (<6 mm) in 10 patients (2.5-5.7 mm; mean size 3.9 mm). Patient follow-up included clinical and laboratory data collection, Doppler ultrasonography (US), and computed tomography (CT). Intraoperative portal vein stent placement was technically successful in all of our study patients, even in 6 patients with total occlusion of the portal vein. A total of 10 study patients underwent thrombectomy of the portal vein, 1 underwent patient portosystemic shunt ligation, and 7 patients had both procedures simultaneously. Portal venous patency has been maintained for 0-56 months (mean 16 months) in 42 (95%) of the 44 stent placements. In conclusion, intraoperative portal vein stent placement is an effective and long lasting treatment modality for treat portal venous stenosis, especially in patients with portal vein occlusion or small sized portal vein.     

Explanted portal vein grafts for middle hepatic vein tributaries in living-donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: The availability of a venous graft is limited in the setting of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), and the management of the middle hepatic vein middle hepatic vein tributaries in right lobe LDLT still remains controversial. METHODS: Twenty-three right lobe LDLT grafts, with the reconstruction of middle hepatic vein tributaries using the explanted portal veins from the explanted livers, were evaluated for the patency, postLDLT liver function tests, and graft survival. RESULTS: The methods of outflow reconstruction were classified into three types: the interposition of the graft to the middle/left hepatic vein (n=12), to the vena cava (n=9), and to the vena cava as a co-orifice with the graft right hepatic vein (n=2). The 1- and 3-year patency rates were 76.7% and 76.7% respectively, with the graft occlusion in five cases. The occluded cases (n=5) had significantly higher aspartate aminotransferase and alanine transaminase levels as compared with those of patent cases (n=18) at 4 weeks after transplantation (P<0.01). However, there was no significant difference in the total bilirubin and prothrombin time in either group during the observation periods. The 1- and 3-year graft survival rates were 91.1% and 91.1%, respectively. In addition, there was no graft loss due to occlusion. CONCLUSION: The use of the recipient's explanted full-length hilar portal vein for the reconstruction of the middle hepatic vein tributaries is thus considered to be a feasible and valuable strategy in the setting of a right lobe LDLT, where appropriate vascular grafts are not always available.     

Innovative techniques for and results of portal vein reconstruction in living-related liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Portal vein reconstruction is a crucial factor affecting the outcome of a successful living-related liver transplantation. We describe here our experience with portal vein reconstruction in 314 cases of living-related liver transplantation with use of novel surgical modalities to enable the transplant surgeons to deal with any size mismatch between the donor's and recipient's portal veins. METHODS: Portal vein reconstruction was classified into 2 major groups, anastomosis without and with a vein graft. When there was no stenosis of the recipient portal vein and the diameter was the same, the portal trunk was used for anastomosis. When the diameter mismatch was minimal, branch patch anastomosis was feasible. When the recipient portal vein was significantly stenotic and the portal vein of the graft was long enough, we removed the stenotic trunk and constructed an anastomosis between the graft portal vein and the confluence of the recipient portal vein. When the graft portal vein was short, a vein graft was interposed. The vein patch technique was preferable when the diameter of the graft vein was not large enough for the interposition technique. RESULTS: Anastomosis without vein graft included trunk anastomosis (n = 156), branch patch anastomosis (n = 39), and confluence anastomosis (n = 22). Anastomosis with vein graft used the interposition technique (n = 77) and vein patch technique (n = 27). The origin of the grafts was mostly from the maternal left ovarian vein (70%) or the paternal inferior mesenteric vein (27%). Complications related to portal vein reconstruction occurred in 16 (5%) patients: portal vein thrombosis in 8, stenosis in 7, and fatal rupture in 1 patient. The incidence of complications was similar for all techniques except for confluence anastomosis. CONCLUSION: Our innovative techniques should be helpful for overcoming diameter or length mismatches in portal vein reconstruction in pediatric liver transplantation.     

Portal Vein Stenting for Portal Hypertension Caused by Local Recurrence After Pancreatoduodenectomy for Periampullary Cancer

Portal hypertension after extensive abdominal surgery is an unusual cause of repetitive gastrointestinal bleeding. We report on a 68-year-old male patient with intermittent gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to portal vein stenosis caused by local recurrence of the distal bile duct cancer after pancreatoduodenectomy. Severe portal vein stenosis without sufficient development of portal venous collaterals was detected 25 months after pancreatoduodenectomy. Direct portography using a percutaneous transhepatic approach showed that there was a pressure gradient of 18 mmHg across the portal vein stenosis. Portal vein stenting successfully relieved portal hypertension and bowel congestion. Gastrointestinal bleeding episodes ceased after stenting. The patient died from liver metastasis 14 months after stent insertion and 39 months after pancreatoduodenectomy. Based on this case and literature reports, the possibility of portal vein stenosis should be considered for patients who have undergone pancreatoduodenectomy and then showed unexplained gastrointestinal bleeding. Percutaneous transhepatic stent insertion appears to be the treatment of choice for focal portal vein stenosis.     

Recovery of graft circulation following percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for stenotic venous complications in pediatric liver transplantation: assessment with Doppler ultrasound

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was performed for venous stenosis after living related liver transplantation in three children. Two of them had hepatic vein stenosis and one had stenosis of both the hepatic and portal veins. Progressive development of ascites and deterioration of liver function were found in all cases. Serial Doppler ultrasound studies showed that the flow velocity in the hepatic vein gradually decreased with a flattened velocity waveform, followed by a decrease in portal blood flow. After a successful hepatic vein angioplasty, the velocity in the hepatic and portal veins increased and the Doppler waveform in the hepatic vein became pulsatile in two cases. In the remaining case, a remarkable recovery of both graft perfusion and clinical findings was achieved via combined hepatic vein and portal vein angioplasty. We conclude that balloon angioplasty is an effective alternative to surgery for post-transplant vascular stenosis and that Doppler ultrasound is useful in monitoring graft circulation.     

Hemodynamic profiles during piggyback liver grafts using arterial or portal revascularization

BACKGROUND: The order of revascularization in human liver grafts is still discussed. This study tries to answer this question in terms of hemodynamic data. STUDY DESIGN: Fifty-nine patients were randomized in this study to compare hemodynamic data just before and 15 minutes after revascularization of liver grafts in relation to first hepatic artery (n = 29) or first portal vein (n = 30) revascularization procedure. RESULTS: Hemodynamic variations were significantly greater in the portal vein group than in the hepatic artery group in terms of mean arterial pressure, cardiac index, central venous pressure, pulmonary capillary pressure, and systemic vascular resistance. The latter decreased from 741.8 +/- 390.3 to 659.9 +/- 411.1 dynes/ cm5 (NS) in the hepatic artery group versus 807.7 +/-336.7 to 439.7 +/- 215 dynes/cm5 (p < 0.05) in the portal vein group. Clinical results and postoperative complications, graft characteristics, patient survival, and graft survival were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Initial arterial revascularization of the liver graft leads to a more stable hemodynamic profile during revascularization of the liver graft after vascular unclamping. This technique is always feasible and has become our reference procedure.     

改进成人间活体供肝移植的手术技术

目的研究并改进成人间活体供肝移植的手术技术。方法自2002年1月至2005年8月,施行了16例成人间活体右半供肝移植。手术中改进了技术,包括右肝静脉重建、肝中静脉分支搭桥、肝动脉搭桥及胆道吻合等。结果所有供者均无严重并发症及死亡。移植肝与受者重量比（GRWR）为0．72％～1．24％,其中9例〈1．0％,2例〈0．8％。手术除了采用移植肝的右肝静脉与受者下腔静脉（IVC）直接吻合外,5例加行右肝下静脉重建、5例取自体大隐静脉行肝中静脉分支与IVC间搭桥,保证了右肝流出道通畅。最早手术的2例受者中,1例发生肝静脉吻合口狭窄,另1例发生小肝综合征,最终导致死亡。后阶段手术的14例受者均未发生小肝综合征;发生并发症5例,分别为急性排斥反应、肝动脉栓塞、胆漏、左膈下脓肿及肺部感染;1例再次肝移植后因肺部感染,多器官功能衰竭（MOF）死亡。结论活体供肝移植中采用改进的手术技术,特别是肝静脉流出道重建的方法,可有效避免发生小肝综合征。     

No‐Touch Hepatic Hilum Technique to Treat Early Portal Vein Thrombosis After Pediatric Liver Transplantation

A ‘no‐touch’ hilum technique used to treat early portal vein complications post‐liver transplantation in five children with body weight <10 kg is described. Four patients developed thrombosis and one portal flow absence secondary to collateral steal flow. A vascular sheath was placed through the previous laparotomy in the ileocolic vein (n = 2), inferior mesenteric vein (n = 1) or graft umbilical vein (n = 1). Portal clots were mechanically fragmented with balloon angioplasty. In addition, coil embolization of competitive collaterals (n = 3) and stent placement (n = 1) were performed. The catheter was left in place and exteriorized through the wound (n = 2) or a different transabdominal wall puncture (n = 3). A continuous transcatheter perfusion of heparin was subsequently administered. One patient developed recurrent thrombosis 24 h later which was resolved with the same technique. Catheters were removed surgically after a mean of 10.6 days. All patients presented portal vein patency at the end of follow‐up. Three patients are alive after 5 months, 1.5 and 3.5 years, respectively; one patient required retransplantation 18 days postprocedure and the remaining patient died of adenovirus infection 2 months postprocedure. In conclusion, treatment of early portal vein complications following pediatric liver transplantation with this novel technique is feasible and effective.     

成人间活体肝移植的手术技术改进(附13例报告)

目的探讨成人间活体肝移植的手术技术改进.方法2005年3-6月,施行了13例成人间右半肝活体肝移植,其中1例接受了2个左半肝,另1例接受了1个活体右半肝,1个尸体左半肝,术中采用了改良的手术技术,包括右肝静脉的重建,肝中静脉分支的搭桥,肝动脉搭桥及胆道吻合的改进.结果全组供体无严重并发症及死亡,受体发生并发症4例,包括肝动脉栓塞,胆漏,右膈下脓肿及肺部感染各1例,1例再移植因术后肺部感染,导致多器官衰竭（MOF）死亡.13例中除右肝静脉与下腔静脉（IVC）直接吻合,5例加行右肝下静脉重建,另5例采用自体大隐静脉搭桥行肝中静脉分支与IVC重建,保证了右肝的流出道通畅.移植物与受体重量比（GRWR）为0.72%至1.24%,其中9例＜1.0%,2例＜0.8%,无小肝综合征发生.结论采用了改进的手术技术,特别是肝静脉流出道的充分重建可有效避免小肝综合征,从而使活体右半肝移植成为相当安全的手术.     

Arterialization of the portal vein improves hepatic microcirculation and tissue oxygenation in experimental cirrhosis

BACKGROUND: Arterialization of the portal vein (APV) has shown beneficial effects on liver regeneration and function in selected patients undergoing liver resection and transplantation. Whether APV improves liver perfusion and function in cirrhosis is unclear. This study investigated the effect of APV on hepatic haemodynamics and liver function in a rat model of cirrhosis. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats (250-300 g) were divided into three groups: normal controls (n = 7), cirrhosis with sham laparotomy (sham; n = 7) and cirrhosis with APV (APV; n = 9). Portal venous blood flow, portal vein pressure and hepatic parenchymal microcirculation (HPM) were measured before and after APV. Hepatic parenchymal oxygenation was assessed by near-infrared spectroscopy and hepatocellular injury by standard liver function tests. Measurements were taken at baseline, after APV and 7 days after surgery. RESULTS: APV increased portal blood flow and pressure in cirrhotic rats without altering intrahepatic portal resistance. APV increased the HPM in cirrhotic rats by a mean(s.e.m.) of 28.5(0.1) per cent on day 0 and 54.6(0.1) per cent by day 7 (P = 0.001). Liver tissue oxygenation was increased by APV and the plasma gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase level was reduced (mean(s.e.m.) 6.0(0.5) versus 3.8(0.3) units/l before and after APV respectively; P = 0.006) at day 7. CONCLUSION: APV increases portal blood flow, tissue perfusion and oxygenation in cirrhosis.     

Could the use of interposition grafts for arterial reconstruction be avoided by more caudate graft placement in living donor liver transplantation?

One of the major challenges in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is short and small vessels (particularly the hepatic artery), particularly in segmental liver grafts from living donors. In the present study we report an alternative surgical technique that avoids interpositional vessel grafts or tension on the connection by anastomizing the allograft hepatic vein to the recipient inferior vena cava in a more caudate location. From March 2000 to January 2003, 28 patients (11 women/17 men) underwent 28 LDLT. Until June 2001, the preferred technique for hepatic vein anastomosis was end-to-end anastomosis between the allograft hepatic vein and the recipient hepatic vein (HV-HV) (n = 10). Thereafter an end-to-side anastomosis was performed between allograft hepatic vein and recipient inferior vena cava (HV-IVC) (n = 18). The level of venotomy on the recipient vena cava was decided according to the pre-anastomotic placement of the allograft in the recipient hepatectomy site with sufficient width to have an hepatic artery anastomosis without tension or need for an interposition graft during hepatic artery and portal vein anastomoses. Except the right lobe allograft with anterior and posterior portal branches, all portal and hepatic artery anastomoses were constructed without an interposition graft or tension in the HV-IVC group. Only one hepatic artery thrombosis developed in the HV-IVC group. As a result, this technique may avoid both hepatic artery thrombosis and the use of interposition grafts in living donor liver transplantation.