Prospective, paired comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia less than -6.00 diopters

PURPOSE: To compare visual and refractive results, contrast sensitivity, and tear stability after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in one eye and laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) in the fellow eye for low myopia. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with low myopia, with a maximum difference of 1 D between their two eyes, were randomly assigned to receive LASEK on one eye and LASIK on the other eye. A total of 64 eyes of 32 patients with a mean age of 26.83 +/- 5.33 years were included in the study. Preoperative myopia ranged from -1.00 to -6.00 D. Follow-up was 6 to 12 months. Uncorrected (UCVA) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), Schirmer test results, tear break-up time, corneal asphericity, corneal uniformity index, predicted corneal acuity, and contrast sensitivity values were compared with preoperative values. A Wilcoxon test was used for statistical comparisons and a P-value less than .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: At 6 months after surgery, there was no statistically significant difference in UCVA, BSCVA, spherical and cylindrical refractive error, Schirmer test, or tear break-up time between groups. Contrast sensitivity values in the LASIK eyes were lower in comparison to preoperative values, but there was no change in the LASEK group. CONCLUSIONS: Based on 6-month results, LASEK for low myopia was safe and effective with predictable results, offered early refractive stability, and may be considered an alternative for LASIK.     

A control-matched comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia

PURPOSE: To compare the visual and refractive outcomes of laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for the treatment of low to moderate myopia. DESIGN: Retrospective, nonrandomized, control-matched study. METHODS: The charts of 2257 eyes that underwent LASEK or LASIK treatment were reviewed. Patients who were 21 years of age or older having between -0.75 and -6.00 diopters (D) of myopia with up to -2.25 D of astigmatism were included. One hundred twenty-two LASEK-treated eyes were matched with 122 LASIK-treated eyes having preoperative spheres, cylinders, and spherical equivalent (SE) within +/-0.50 D. Both groups had similar preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), laser platform, and follow-up durations. Outcome measures were visual and refractive results. RESULTS: Preoperatively, the mean SE was -3.50 +/- 1.40 D for LASEK and -3.50 +/- 1.42 D for LASIK (P = .59). Postoperatively, the mean logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 0.01 +/- 0.08 (20/21) for LASEK and 0.06 +/- 0.12 (20/23) for LASIK; the mean SE was -0.15 +/- 0.40 D for LASEK and -0.37 +/- 0.45 D for LASIK; and the mean logMAR of BSCVA was -0.03 +/- 0.06 (20/19) for LASEK and -0.02 +/- 0.05 (20/19) for LASIK. No eye lost 2 or more lines of BSCVA in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Slight differences in the visual and refractive results between LASEK and LASIK were observed, despite the use of the same nomogram. Both procedures were safe, effective, and predictable. Nomogram adjustment may be necessary for LASIK surgeons adopting surface ablation.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis versus surface ablation: visual outcomes and complications

PURPOSE: To compare the visual outcomes and complications of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with those of surface treatment by laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK), photorefractive keratectomy with mechanical epithelial removal (M-PRK), and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (T-PRK). SETTING: Tertiary care eye center. METHODS: This retrospective review comprised all cases of LASIK, LASEK, M-PRK, and T-PRK performed at King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital between July 1, 2004, and June 30, 2005. Separate statistical analyses were performed for eyes with low to moderate myopia (spherical equivalent [SE] less than -6.00 diopters [D]) and high myopia (SE -6.00 to -11.25 D). RESULTS: Of 696 eyes that met the inclusion criteria, 464 had LASIK, 104 had LASEK, 69 had M-PRK, and 59 had T-PRK. Eyes with low to moderate myopia had a statistically significantly smaller mean difference between logMAR final postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) after T-PRK and M-PRK than after LASIK or LASEK. A higher percentage of eyes with high myopia had a final UCVA within +/-2 lines of the preoperative BSCVA with T-PRK than with LASIK, LASEK, or M-PRK. There were more major non-flap-related complications after LASEK than after LASIK, M-PRK, or T-PRK. CONCLUSIONS: In eyes with low to moderate myopia, T-PRK and M-PRK provided slightly better visual outcomes than LASIK or LASEK. In eyes with high myopia, T-PRK provided better visual outcomes than LASIK, LASEK, and M-PRK. Laser in situ keratomileusis was associated with the most major postoperative complications.     

激光角膜上皮瓣下磨镶术和激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗中高度近视的对比研究

目的比较激光角膜瓣下磨镶术(LASEK)和激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)治疗中高度近视的临床效果. 方法中高度近视患者198例(394只眼).其中LASEK手术治疗93例(184只眼), LASIK手术治疗105例(210只眼). 结果术后1天,LASIK 组28 %裸眼视力达到1.0,LASEK组无1例裸眼视力达到1.0.术后1周、1、3、6月裸眼视力大于或等于1.0者,两组比较差异无显著性 (P=0.36,P=0.58,P=0.44,P=0.64).角膜地形图分析平均角膜中央屈光力与周边屈光力的差异,LASEK组(0.69)明显小于LASIK组(2.62).结论 LASEK手术矫正中高度近视均有良好的治疗效果,是一种安全、有效、预测性好的屈光手术.     

Effectiveness of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy to treat residual refractive errors after laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) to treat residual refractive errors after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTINGS: Isik Eye Clinic, Ankara, Turkey. METHODS: This retrospective study included 24 eyes of 15 patients who had retreatment by LASEK for residual refractive errors after myopic LASIK. All patients had examinations that included slitlamp biomicroscopy, subjective and cycloplegic refractions, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity, corneal topography, and pachymetry preoperatively and postoperatively. Postoperative examinations were performed at 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS: The patient cohort comprised 9 men and 6 women. The median spherical equivalent (SE) of attempted correction for retreatment with LASEK was -1.25 diopters (D). The median follow-up after LASEK was 11.5 months (range 6 to 16 months). At the end of the follow-up, the median SE of the refractive error was -0.38 D. The median UCVA increased from 20/45 before LASEK to 20/25 at the last follow-up visit, which was statistically significant (P<.001). After LASEK, significant postoperative haze developed in 5 eyes. In all 5 eyes, the estimated ablation depth was more than 40 mum and the SE of attempted correction was -2.00 D or greater. CONCLUSIONS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy retreatment in eyes with myopic regression after LASIK resulted in a significant improvement in UCVA that was comparable to the improvement after flap lifting. An SE of attempted correction greater than -2.00 D was associated with a significant rate of haze.     

Effect of amniotic membrane after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy on epithelial healing: clinical and refractive outcomes

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of an amniotic membrane (AM) on reepithelialization time, corneal haze, and postoperative visual and refractive outcomes after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) for myopia and myopic astigmatism. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, and Balgeunsesang Ophthalmology Clinic, Seoul, Korea. METHODS: One hundred fifty-two eyes of 84 patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism were prospectively evaluated for 6 months after LASEK. An AM was placed as a strip on the inferior limbus in 94 eyes of 54 patients after LASEK; 58 eyes of 30 patients served as the control group. Postoperative epithelial healing time, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity, remaining refractive error, and corneal haze were examined. RESULTS: The reepithelialization time was shorter in the AM group (2.40 days +/- 0.94 [SD]) than in the control group (3.90 +/- 0.97 days) (P<.001). At 6 months, 86 eyes (91.5%) in the AM group had a UCVA of 20/25 or better and 90 eyes (95.7%) had a UCVA of 20/40 or better; 48 eyes (82.8%) and 53 eyes (91.4%) in the control group had a UCVA of 20/25 or better and 20/40 or better, respectively. The mean spherical equivalent in the AM group was -0.48 +/- 0.54 diopter (D) and in the control group, -0.94 +/- 0.60 D (P<.001). The corneal haze was significantly less in the AM group than in the control group (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Amniotic membrane use after LASEK induced rapid epithelial healing with more favorable visual and refractive outcomes and lower corneal haze scores than conventional LASEK.     

超薄瓣准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术与准分子激光角膜上皮瓣下磨镶术治疗薄角膜高度近视眼的临床研究

目的探讨超薄角膜瓣的准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)和准分子激光角膜上皮瓣下磨镶术(LASEK)在治疗中央角膜厚度<500μm的高度近视眼时的有效性和安全性。方法随机使用超薄瓣LASIK和LASEK两种方法治疗近视度数>-6·00D、角膜厚度为450~500μm的近视眼患者。其中超薄瓣LASIK组23人39只眼,近视度数为-6·00~-9·50D,平均-7·51D。LASEK组19人37只眼,近视度数为-6·00~-11·50D,平均为-7·50D。分别于治疗后1、3、6、12个月检查并记录裸眼视力、矫正视力、等值球镜度、角膜上皮下雾状混浊(haze)程度等并进行比较。结果超薄瓣LASIK组术后反应较轻,LASEK组角膜上皮完整时间平均为4d,术后裸眼视力超薄瓣LASIK组恢复较快,在术后1、3、6、12个月裸眼视力在1·0以上者分别占64·1%、87·2%、87·2%和79·3%,LASEK组分别为37·8%、75·7%、67·6%和71·4%。等值球镜度在±0·50D之间者超薄瓣LASIK组为48·7%、51·3%、61·5%、82·8%,LASEK组为51·4%、45·9%、45·9%和57·1%。术中、术后无发生严重并发症,超薄瓣LASIK组并发症主要为角膜瓣细小条纹和过矫,LASEK组并发症主要为屈光回退和轻微的haze。结论超薄瓣LASIK在治疗高度近视的安全性和有效性方面与LASEK相同,而治疗后的稳定性优于LASEK,患者的满意率更高。     

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for low to high myopia and astigmatism

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) for the treatment of low to high myopia and astigmatism. SETTING: Solo private practice, Mountain View, California, USA. METHODS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy was performed in 146 eyes of 83 consecutive patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism using a VISX Star S2 excimer laser (72 eyes) or a Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser (74 eyes). The mean preoperative myopic spherical equivalent was -5.32 diopters (D) (range -1.25 to -14.38 D). Data were collected prospectively with a follow-up of 1 to 12 months. Outcome measurements included uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), manifest refraction, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), corneal haze, and complications. RESULTS: After 6 and 12 months, no eye lost 2 or more lines of BSCVA. After 6 months, the UCVA was 20/20 in 57% of eyes and 20/40 or better in 96%. After 12 months, it was 20/20 in 56% of eyes and 20/40 or better in 96%. No eye developed corneal haze that affected visual acuity. There were no serious or vision-threatening complications. CONCLUSIONS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy was safe and effective in treating a wide range of myopia and astigmatism. The potential advantages of LASEK over laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) include the elimination of stromal flap complications and greater choice in patient selection. The disadvantages include varying degrees of pain for 2 days and blurry vision for several days postoperatively.     

Comparison between LASEK with mitomycin C and LASIK for the correction of myopia of -7.00 to -13.75 D

PURPOSE: To compare laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) and LASIK for the correction of high myopia. METHODS: A prospective, single-masked study was conducted. Patients treated with LASEK to correct myopia > or = -7.00 diopters (D) (spherical equivalent manifest refraction) with a cylinder < or = -3.50 D (LASEK group) were compared to patients treated with LASIK (LASIK group) using the same excimer laser (Technolas 217C). Mitomycin C (MMC) 0.02% was applied for 1 minute in all LASEK-treated eyes. RESULTS: A total of 228 consecutive eyes were included in the study (114 in each group, matched for preoperative refraction). The mean preoperative spherical equivalent manifest refraction was -8.72 +/- 1.20 D in the LASEK group and -8.74 +/- 1.20 D in the LASIK group (range: -7.00 to -13.75 D) (P = .9). Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was significantly lower in LASEK eyes 1, 7, and 30 days postoperatively (P = .0001 for each comparison). No significant differences were found at 3 months postoperatively in UCVA (P = .3), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) (P = .2), or in the safety (P = .6) and efficacy (P = .8) indices. Uncorrected visual acuity was 1.0 or better in 34.2% of LASEK eyes and 44.7% of LASIK eyes. Spherical refraction was +0.25 +/- 0.6 D after LASEK and -0.06 +/- 0.5 D after LASIK (P = .0001). Sixty-eight percent of LASEK eyes and 79% of LASIK eyes were within +/- 0.50 D of intended refraction. No LASEK eye versus 7 LASIK eyes lost 2 lines of BSCVA. Eight LASEK eyes gained 2 or more lines of BSCVA versus 1 LASIK eye. CONCLUSIONS: Visual improvement after LASEK with intraoperative MMC was significantly slower than after LASIK. Visual outcomes (UCVA, BSCVA, and safety and efficacy indices) 3 months after surgery were similar with both techniques for the correction of high myopia. Ten percent more eyes after LASIK were within +/- 0.50 D of intended refraction.     

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for myopia: two-year follow-up

PURPOSE: To assess and compare the clinical results (efficacy, safety, stability, and postoperative pain or discomfort) of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) and conventional photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for the correction of low to moderate myopia. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Masaryk University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic. METHODS: A prospective comparative study was performed in 184 eyes of 92 patients who had surface excimer ablation for the correction of myopia. The preoperative mean spherical equivalent (MSE) was -4.65 diopters (D) +/- 3.14 (SD) (range -1.75 to -7.50 D). In each patient, LASEK was performed in 1 eye and PRK in the fellow eye by the same surgeon. The first eye treated and the surgical method used in the first eye were randomized. Both procedures were performed with the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser using the same parameters and nomogram. The postoperative pain level, visual recovery, complications (haze), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and refractive outcome were evaluated and compared. All eyes completed a 24-month follow-up. RESULTS: The postoperative MSE was -0.18 +/- 0.53 D in the PRK eyes and -0.33 +/- 0.46 D in the LASEK eyes. At 1 week, the mean UCVA was 0.64 +/- 0.21 and 0.87 +/- 0.23, respectively. No LASEK eye lost a line of BSCVA. There were no statistically significant differences between PRK and LASEK eyes in the safety and efficacy indices at 2 years. The mean pain level was significantly lower on days 1 to 3 in the LASEK eyes (P <.05). The mean corneal haze level was lower in the LASEK eyes (0.21) than in the PRK eyes (0.43) (P <.05). Seventy-nine patients preferred LASEK to PRK. CONCLUSIONS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy provided significantly quicker visual recovery, eliminated post-PRK pain, and reduced the haze level in eyes with low to moderate myopia compared with conventional PRK. It provided good visual and refractive outcomes. There were no serious complications.     

LASEK治疗中高度近视疗效分析

目的:观察准分子激光上皮瓣下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)治疗中高度近视的临床效果。方法:对46例85眼中度以上近视进行LASEK矫正,根据等效球镜度分为I组(-3.25～-6.00)D、II组(-6.25～-10.00)D、III组(-10.25～-12.9)D。观察术后裸眼视力和最佳矫正视力、显然屈光度、眼压及haze情况。术后随访6mo以上。结果:术后6mo时裸眼视力达到术前最佳矫正视力或更好者3组分别为100%,78%,75%,裸眼视力≥0.5分别为100%,96%,88%,未见最佳矫正视力较术前最佳矫正视力低于2行以上的眼;3组的屈光度稳定在±1.00D内者分别为68.4%,58.0%,43.7%;3组的平均屈光度分别为(-0.38±0.66)D、(-0.77±1.25)D、(-1.25±1.97)D。II组和III组术后发生不同程度的haze(≤2级)。结论:LASEK治疗中高度近视安全有效。haze和屈光回退是治疗高度和超高度近视主要并发症,从某种角度说,控制了haze的发生也就在很大程度上控制了术后的屈光回退的速率。     

Laser subepithelial keratomileusis for myopia of -6 to -10 diopters with astigmatism with the MEL60 laser

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, predictability, and safety of laser subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for treatment of high myopia with astigmatism. METHODS: LASEK was performed in 61 eyes of 36 consecutive patients with myopic spherical equivalent refraction of -6.00 to -10.00 D using the Aesculap-Meditec MEL60 excimer laser. Data were collected prospectively with a follow-up of 6 to 17 months. Main outcome measures recorded were UCVA, BSCVA, residual refractive error, corneal haze, and complications. RESULTS: Ninety-six percent of eyes achieved 20/40 or better UCVA at 1 month. At 12 months, 64% of eyes achieved 20/20 and 92% achieved 20/40 or better UCVA. Two eyes lost 2 lines of BSCVA at 6 or 12 months. Accuracy of correction was +/- 0.50 D from emmetropia in 82% of eyes, and +/- 1.00 D in 90% at 12 months. No eye showed more than grade 1 haze. Grade 1 haze was observed in three eyes at 12 months. One patient had mild postoperative keratitis, which was successfully treated. CONCLUSIONS: LASEK with the Aesculap-Meditec MEL60 excimer laser appeared to be safe, effective, and highly predictable in treating high myopia.     

Transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy/photorefractive keratectomy with adjunctive mitomycin-C for complicated LASIK flaps

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy/photorefractive keratectomy (PTK/PRK) with prophylactic mitomycin-C for the treatment of refractive errors and maintenance of corneal clarity following flap complications in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Outpatient tertiary care center, Chicago, Illinois, USA. METHODS: Ten eyes of 10 patients with LASIK flap complications had transepithelial PTK/PRK for correction of ametropia. Mitomycin-C 0.02% was applied to the stroma for 2 minutes following laser ablation. Postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refractions, and slitlamp examinations were obtained. RESULTS: Preoperatively, the mean UCVA was 20/400 (range 20/40 to counting fingers), the mean BSCVA was 20/28.5, and the spherical equivalent refractive errors ranged from +4.00 to -10.75 diopters (D). After the procedure, the mean UCVA was 20/28, the mean BSCVA was 20/21, and the spherical equivalent refractive errors ranged from +0.37 to -1.00 D. The mean follow-up ranged from 8 to 28 months. No patient experienced delayed reepithelialization, haze, or other signs of toxicity. CONCLUSION: Mitomycin-C can be a useful adjunctive therapy for the prevention of haze when applying surface excimer laser therapy to a cornea following LASIK flap complications.     

LASEK与LASIK治疗高度近视

目的:对比观察准分子激光上皮瓣下角膜磨削术(LASEK)与准分子激光原位角膜磨削术(LASIK)治疗高度近视的临床疗效。评估2种手术的安全性和有效性。方法:对行LASEK治疗的39例75只眼和同期行LASIK治疗的41例79只眼高度近视分别进行6个月以上的临床观察。结果:LASEK组术后1周至1个月达最佳矫正视力,术后3个月部分出现视力回退,术后6个月裸眼视力达术前矫正视力占95.83%,主要并发症有术后高眼压及Haze形成;LASIK组术后6个月裸眼视力达术前矫正视力占94.35%,主要并发症为屈光回退,角膜上皮内生或角膜瓣皱折等。结论:LASIK与LASEK均能安全、有效地矫正高度近视。     

Comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for low to moderate myopia

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness, safety, and stability of laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), a modified photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) technique, with those of conventional PRK for low to moderate myopia. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. METHODS: In this prospective study, 27 patients with a manifest refraction of -3.00 to -6.50 diopters were treated and followed for 3 months. In each case, PRK was performed in 1 eye and LASEK in the other eye. The first eye treated and the surgical method used in the first eye were randomized. Postoperative pain, epithelial healing time, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), manifest refraction, corneal haze, and surgical preference were examined in PRK- and LASEK-treated eyes. RESULTS: During the 3 month follow-up, there were no significant between-eye differences in epithelial healing time, UCVA, or refractive error. However, LASEK-treated eyes had lower postoperative pain scores (P =.047) and corneal haze scores (1 month; P =.02) than PRK-treated eyes. Seventeen patients (63%) preferred the LASEK procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Laser epithelial keratomileusis safely and effectively treated eyes with low to moderate myopia. It reduced the incidence of significant postoperative pain and corneal haze and may prevent the flap- and interface-related problems of laser in situ keratomileusis.     

Photorefractive keratectomy retreatment after LASIK

PURPOSE: To study the results of late photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in corneas originally subjected to LASIK. METHODS: Seven eyes of seven patients who had LASIK for myopia were retreated with PRK at least 2 years after LASIK. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refraction, and haze were evaluated before and after LASIK and after retreatment by PRK. RESULTS: Photorefractive keratectomy retreatment improved BSCVA in six (86%) of seven eyes, and one (14%) eye showed no changes. None of the eyes lost lines of BSCVA. Five of seven eyes developed mild haze, which disappeared before the last postoperative follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Photorefractive keratectomy retreatment performed at least 2 years after LASIK can improve visual acuity. We hypothesize that LASIK-induced corneal nerve damage disturbs corneal wound healing by increasing the tendency for development of haze.     

Laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia with the autonomous laser

PURPOSE: To describe the refractive outcome, objective clinical data, and subjective patient experiences after laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective, nonrandomized, comparative study of 58 LASEK-treated eyes (36 patients) with myopia (with and without astigmatism) between -1.50 and -14.75 D (mean -7.80 +/- 2.90 D, median -7.90 D). Refractive surgery was performed using the Alcon Summit Autonomous LADAR Vision excimer laser. Manifest refraction, best-spectacle and uncorrected Snellen visual acuity, stability of refraction, and corneal haze were evaluated before surgery and up to 6 months after surgery. A group of randomly selected LASIK-treated eyes were compared at each time point. RESULTS: Patients who opted for monovision (n=12) were excluded. In the emmetropia targeted eyes (n=46), 45%, 83%, 85%, and 89% achieved 20/40 or better uncorrected Snellen visual acuity (UCVA) at 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, and 1 month respectively. At 6 months, 73% (n=28) of eyes treated achieved UCVA 20/20 with 97% achieving 20/40 or better (mean, -0.51 D). At 3 and 6 months, 71% (n=46) and 68% (n=28) were within +/- 0.50 D of emmetropia. The percentage of eyes that achieved UCVA 20/40 or better at 6 months was 97% (n=28). Visually significant corneal haze was evident in two LASEK-treated patients (four eyes) at 6 months. No eyes lost two or more lines of best spectacle-corrected Snellen visual acuity. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary data suggest that LASEK appears to be a safe, effective, and comparable alternative to LASIK, even for higher amounts of myopia. A prospective, randomized clinical trial is needed to better define the role of LASEK as it compares to other refractive procedures, specifically LASIK and PRK.     

Laser epithelial keratomileusis for the treatment of low to moderate myopia: preliminary results

PURPOSE: To analyze the refractive outcome and the postoperative pain and corneal haze following laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for the treatment of low to moderate myopia. METHODS: A monocentric prospective noncomparative study was started in June 2000, after informed consent was obtained from patients with a spherical equivalent of less than -5 diopters (D). This study actually was part of another prospective comparative study where the contralateral eye underwent photorefractive keratectomy. An epithelial debridement was performed using diluted ethanol, the epithelial flap was lifted, photoablation was performed, the flap was put back in place, and secured by a bandage contact lens. The refractive outcome was assessed, and postoperative pain and haze were graded using an analogical visual scale from 0 to 10 and a scale of 0 to 4, respectively. RESULTS: We included 17 eyes of 16 patients. LASEK was performed successfully in 15 eyes (88.2%). One of these eyes could not be assessed for the refractive outcome and postoperative haze because the epithelial flap was torn during contact lens removal. The mean postoperative pain level during the night following the procedure was 5.7+/-2.0. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was -2.5+/-1.0 D, and after a 2-month follow-up, the mean postoperative SE was +0.26+/-0.6 D. Twelve eyes (85.7%) and 10 eyes (71.4%) were within +/-1.0 D and +/-0.5 D from the attempted correction, respectively. The corneal haze grade was less than 1 in 12 eyes (85.7%) and equal to 1 in two eyes (14.3%). No complications and no loss of postoperative best-corrected visual acuity were noted. CONCLUSIONS: LASEK appears to be a reliable and reproducible technique for the treatment of myopia-associated SE of less than -5 D. Postoperative pain is moderate and flap-related complications of LASIK are avoided.     

Results of phototherapeutic keratectomy in the management of flap striae after LASIK

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) in reducing or resolving visually significant surface irregularities resulting from flap striae after LASIK. DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-three eyes of 22 patients with flap striae after LASIK and reduced best-corrected visual acuity or visual symptoms that resolved with diagnostic contact lens fitting treated between January 2001 and April 2002 with at least 1 month of follow-up. The mean follow-up interval was 134 days (range, 30-354 days). INTERVENTION: Transepithelial PTK. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), resolution or reduction of preoperative symptoms, corneal haze, and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA). RESULTS: Mean BSCVA and UCVA improved significantly from 20/32 and 20/48 to 20/22 and 20/33 (P<0.0001 and P = 0.027), respectively, after PTK. There was a significant mean hyperopic shift of 0.88 diopters (D; P = 0.002, range, -1.38 to +3.88 D). Fourteen eyes (61%) were clinically clear, 6 eyes (23%) had trace haze, and 3 eyes (16%) had 1+ haze at the last follow-up visit. Mean spherical equivalent refractive error before LASIK was -7.23 D (range, -2.88 to -13.55 D). Twenty-two of 23 eyes had significant qualitative resolution or reduction of preoperative visual symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: In cases of visually significant LASIK flap striae, PTK is effective in improving best-corrected visual acuity and reducing visual symptoms. High myopia may be a risk factor for development of visually significant microstriae. Development of anterior stromal haze did not exceed 1+ density and was not correlated to either the number of laser pulses or the length of the follow-up period.     

Results of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia of -10 to -19 diopters with a Technolas 217 laser

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness, predictability, and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting myopia greater than -10.00 D. METHODS: Sixty-five eyes of 37 patients with myopia greater than -10.00 D underwent LASIK. Patients were evaluated on day 1, 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. Parameters evaluated were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), residual refractive error, regression of correction, and presence of any complication. RESULTS: Mean preoperative BSCVA was 0.745 +/- 0.234, which improved to 0.8070 +/- 0.237 postoperatively. The average preoperative UCVA was 0.022 +/- 0.02; postoperative UCVA at 6 months was 0.536 +/- 0.255. UCVA of 20/40 or better was achieved in 58% (38 eyes) and 20/20 or better in 26% (17 eyes). The average refractive error before LASIK was -12.64 +/- 2.16 D (range -10.00 to -19.00 D). Mean residual refractive error 1 week following LASIK was -0.63 +/- 1.36 D, which regressed to a mean -1.78 +/- 2.08 D at the end of 6 months. Nineteen eyes (29%) were within +/-0.50 D of intended refractive correction. CONCLUSION: LASIK was partially effective in the correction of high myopia. An initial overcorrection may be programmed to offset the effect of refractive regression.