Inability to escalate vinorelbine dose intensity using a daily × 3 schedule with and without filgrastim in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Purpose: Vinorelbine (Navelbine) is a semisynthetic vinca alkaloid with documented activity in breast cancer. The major dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) when given weekly is myelosuppression with minimal neurologic toxicity. This phase I study attempted to define the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and the DLT of vinorelbine on a daily ×3 schedule with and without filgrastim support. Methods: A total of 19 patients with stage IV breast cancer were enrolled in separate studies at Duke University Medical Center (DUMC) and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI). Eligible patients could have received up to two prior chemotherapy regimens in the metastatic setting and had to have an ANC >1500/mm², PLT >100 000 m³, creatinine <2.0 mg/dl, bilirubin <2.0 mg/dL, SGOT not more than three times normal, and performance status 0–1. Vinorelbine was administered using a daily ×3 schedule every 3 weeks. The protocols were designed to study dose escalation with and without growth factor support. At DUMC, in the initial phase of the study, the starting dose was 15 mg/m² per day and dose escalations of 5 mg/m² were planned until DLT developed and the MTD was defined. DLT was defined as granulocytopenia <500/mm³ for >7 days, grade IV thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, or grade III or greater nonhematologic toxicity. In the second phase of the study, growth factor support was given with vinorelbine at the MTD. Filgrastim at a dose of 5 g/kg was started on day 4 of the 21-day cycle and was continued until the neutrophil count exceeded 10 000 cells/mm³. At DFCI, all patients received growth factor starting on day 4 and the starting dose of vinorelbine was 25 mg/m². Results: At DUMC, DLT was seen at 20 mg/m² in three of three patients and included febrile neutropenia, grade IV neutropenia >7 days, grade III neurotoxicity, and grade III vomiting. Despite the addition of filgrastim, DLT was again seen at 20 mg/m² and included grade III neurotoxicity (jaw pain, abdominal pain, constipation, ileus) and grade IV mucositis. Three patients at DFCI were treated with vinorelbine at a dose of 25 mg/m² with growth factor support, and two developed DLT including febrile neutropenia, neutropenia >7 days, and grade III stomatitis. Conclusions: Our effort to escalate the dose intensity of vinorelbine on this schedule was not successful and was complicated by hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity. A daily ×3 schedule of vinorelbine should not be pursued as an alternative treatment regimen in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer. Received: 27 October 1997 / Accepted: 16 April 1998     

Phase I dose escalation study of topotecan combined with alternating schedules of paclitaxel and carboplatin in advanced solid tumors

Background:Combining topotecan with other cytotoxics has been problematic due to marrow suppression. A phase I trial was initiated to identify the optimal sequence and maximum-tolerated dose of topotecan in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin. Patients and methods:Patients with advanced cancer and performance status ECOG 2. The starting dose was paclitaxel 175 mg/m² day 1, carboplatin AUC 6.0 day 1, and topotecan 0.5 mg/m² daily day 1–5 (early sequence). The next course of paclitaxel and carboplatin administration was delayed to day 5 (late sequence). Treatment was repeated every three weeks. After determining maximum-tolerated dose without cytokines, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was added and further dose escalation was pursued. Results:Fifty-one patients were entered; men : women ratio 30 : 21. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) for the early sequence was neutropenia at doses paclitaxel mg/m²/carboplatin AUC 5/topotecan mg/m² (PCT) 175/5/0.75 for four to five days. DLT for the late sequence was neutropenia at PCT doses of 175/5/1.0 for four days. G-CSF 5 µg/kg subcutaneously starting day 6 permitted further topotecan dose escalation. After adding G-CSF, late sequence DLT was neutropenia at doses 175/5/1.25 for four days. Forty-six patients were evaluable for response and of those, there were thirteen partial responses. Conclusions:The late sequence resulted in less toxicity and was better tolerated. The early sequence maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was 175/6/0.5 for five days. The late sequence MTD was PCT 175/5/0.75 for five days. The late sequence MTD with G-CSF was 175/5/1.0 for four days. The recommended phase II PCT dose is the late sequence 175/5/1.0 for four days with G-CSF.     

Irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with weekly administration of cisplatin (CDDP) for non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose: CPT-11 (60 mg/m² on days 1, 8 and 15) in combination with CDDP (80 mg/m² on day 1) has shown promising antitumor activity for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) are leukopenia and diarrhea, with a wide variation among patients. To estimate weekly CDDP administration in combination with CPT-11, a phase I study for patients with advanced NSCLC was conducted. Methods: Patients were treated with CPT-11 at a fixed dose of 60 mg/m² together with CDDP at 27 mg/m² (level 1, 6 patients), 33 mg/m² (level 2, 12 patients), and 40 mg/m² (level 3, 6 patients) with 1600 ml hydration on days 1, 8 and 15 over 4 weeks. During the treatment course, drug was not administered on the day it was due in the presence of leukopenia (<3000/ml) and/or diarrhea. Results: The planned administration was completed in 5 of 6 patients at level 1, 6 of 12 patients at level 2, and 2 of 6 patients at level 3. The most common toxicity observed was leukopenia (five patients with grade 3 and one patient with grade 4). Leukopenia was considered to be a DLT, and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was level 2. Although there were patients who suffered from diarrhea (four patients with higher than grade 2), diarrhea was judged not to be a DLT with this weekly regimen. Nausea and vomiting were mild. Pharmacokinetic analysis of free platinum from CDDP demonstrated that the area under the curve (AUC) from 33 mg/m² CDDP was 0.92 ± 0.29 g/ml h. In 13 patients evaluated for response, the response rate was 54%. Conclusion: The value of weekly administration of CDDP in combination with CPT-11 was shown by (1) diarrhea not being dose-limiting, (2) mild nausea, (3) well-maintained AUC of free platinum, and (4) promising activity. Received: 4 April 1997 / Accepted: 8 October 1997     

A phase I trial of AUC-directed carboplatin with infusional doxorubicin and ifosfamide plus G-CSF in patients with advanced gynecologic malignancies

The effect of the addition of G-CSF to carboplatin, ifosfamide and doxorubicin (CIA) at the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) was studied in a phase I clinical trial. Nine patients with incurable solid tumors were treated: six endometrial and epithelial ovarian cancers, one colon cancer with pelvic masses and two unknown primary cancers. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula and administered in a standard 30-min intravenous infusion. The initial carboplatin dose was AUC 4.0 mg/ml per min. Fixed doses of ifosfamide (1.25 g/m² per day), mesna (1.0 g/m² per day, and doxorubicin (15 mg/m² per day) were combined and given as a 4-day continuous intravenous infusion in an attempt to decrease nonhematologic toxicity. The dose-limiting toxicity of CIA was myelosuppression, mainly neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Nonhematologic toxicities were hemorrhagic cystitis, weakness, fatigue, and nausea and vomiting. The MTD for CIA was established at the first dose level of carboplatin (4.0 mg/ml per min). Following this, G-CSF was added to the regimen in an unsuccessful effort to escalate the carboplatin dose. Free and total carboplatin pharmacokinetics were determined using flameless atomic absorption spectroscopy. There was one complete response and one partial response among eight evaluable patients. Both responding patients had advanced ovarian cancer. We conclude that carboplatin dose intensification beyond an AUC of 4.0 mg/ml per min is not made feasible by the addition of G-CSF to infusional doxorubicin and ifosfamide in patients with advanced gynecologic cancer. Received: 22 December 1999 / Accepted: 28 April 2000     

A phase I/II study of vinorelbine, doxorubicin, and methotrexate with leucovorin rescue as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer

Purpose: This study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity of vinorelbine when used in combination with doxorubicin and methotrexate with leucovorin rescue in women with metastatic breast cancer. Methods: Enrolled in the study were 23 women with metastatic breast cancer who had not received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Patients treated at the first dose level received vinorelbine 20 mg/m² on day 1, doxorubicin 40 mg/m² on day 1, methotrexate 100 mg/m² on day 1 and leucovorin 20 mg orally every 6 h for six doses beginning on day 2. Treatment was repeated every 21 days. The vinorelbine dose was escalated by 5 mg/m² for patients treated at subsequent dose levels. The MTD was defined as the dose level at which fewer than one-third of patients enrolled experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). When the MTD of vinorelbine had been determined, the doxorubicin dose was then escalated by 10 mg/m² with the vinorelbine dose held at its MTD. Results: total of 98 courses of treatment (median of 4 per patient, range 2–8) were administered. The MTD of this regimen was found to be vinorelbine 25 mg/m², doxorubicin 40 mg/m², and methotrexate 100 mg/m² with leucovorin rescue. At higher doses of vinorelbine, neutropenia, fatigue, arm pain, malaise, nausea and vomiting were dose-limiting. Higher doses of doxorubicin resulted in universal dose limiting neutropenia, and frequent nonhematologic DLT consisting of arm pain, malaise, stomatitis, nausea and vomiting. Amongst the 20 patients with measurable disease, there were 3 complete responses (15%, 95% confidence interval 3%–38%), 5 partial responses (25%, 95% confidence interval 9%–49%) and an overall response rate of 40% (95% confidence interval 19%–64%). The median survival was estimated to be 25 months from the start of chemotherapy. Conclusions: Vinorelbine at 25 mg/m² can be safely administered with doxorubicin at 40 mg/m² and methotrexate at 100 mg/m² with leucovorin rescue. Response rates observed with this regimen suggest that this combination of chemotherapeutic agents may not be more effective than the combination of vinorelbine and doxorubicin. Received: 27 April 1998 / Accepted: 17 September 1998     

Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus responding to fourth-line chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel

A patient was diagnosed with a small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (T4N1M1b by the International Union Against Cancer [UICC] classification) in October 2002, and initially received two courses of concurrent chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; 400 mg/m² by continuous infusion; days 1–5 and 8–12) and cisplatin (40 mg/m² by drip infusion; days 1 and 8) and radiation therapy (2 Gy/day, days 1–5, 8–12, and 15–19; total, 30 Gy per course) with the second course given after a 2-week interval. Two courses of chemotherapy with 5-FU (800 mg/m²; days 1–5) and cisplatin (80 mg/m²; day 1) given after this was completed. Although a complete response had been confirmed, recurrence with multiple liver and lymph node metastases was detected 3 months after the cessation of the second course of chemotherapy. Although the patient received second-line chemotherapy with irinotecan (150 mg/m²; every 2 weeks) from June 2003, the disease progressed. Brain metastases developed during third-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m² weekly by drip infusion). The symptoms were attenuated after whole-brain radiation (30 Gy), and fourth-line chemotherapy using paclitaxel (80 mg/m²; weekly) was initiated from November 2003. A computed tomography scan 1 month after the first course of paclitaxel showed remarkable regression of the liver metastases. The treatment strategy used for treating small cell carcinomas of the lung may be applicable for these carcinomas of the esophagus.     

A phase I study of gemcitabine and epirubicin for the treatment of platinum-resistant or refractory advanced ovarian cancer

Background:Gemcitabine is active in patients with otherwiseresistant or refractory ovarian cancer. As the drug is well tolerated, studiesusing gemcitabine combined with other antineoplastic agents are needed. Theaim of the study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) ofepirubicin combined with gemcitabine, with and without support of G-CSF. Patients and methods:Patients with platinum-resistant orrefractory ovarian cancer were eligible. Gemcitabine (G) (starting dose 800mg/m² day 1 and 8; 200 mg/m² escalation per level) andepirubicin (E) (starting dose 60 mg/m² day 1; 15 mg/m²escalation per level) were given every 21 days for four to six cycles. G-CSF(filgrastim 5 µg/kg/die) was given in case of grade 4 neutropenia(levels without support) or from day 9 up to leukocyte count>10,000/mm³ after nadir (levels with support). Cohorts of threepatients were enrolled at each level, and another three patients were planned,if one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was registered. MTD was determined firstwithout and then with G-CSF. Results:Four levels were studied (G 800 + E 60; G 1000 + E 60;G 1000 + E 75; G 1000 + E 75 + G-CSF) with four, four, three and threepatients enrolled, respectively. DLT (grade 4 febrile neutropenia) wasobserved in two patients at level 3. Thus, G1000 + E 60 mg/m² wasthe MTD without G-CSF. The addition of prophylactic G-CSF did not allow afurther increase of the dose and grade 4 thrombocytopenia was the DLT at level4. Non-hematological toxicity was mild. Grade 2 mucositis was reported in fourpatients. Among the 13 patients with measurable or evaluable disease, 3partial responses were observed for an overall response rate of 23.1%. Conclusions:The combination of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m²(day 1, 8) and epirubicin at 60 mg/m² (day 1) is a feasibletherapy. Grade 4 neutropenia is frequent and G-CSF support is often required.With prophylactic support of G-CSF, the DLT is thrombocytopenia.     

A phase I study of irinotecan and infusional cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

 A phase I study was performed to establish the optimum dose for combination therapy with infusional cisplatin and irinotecan (CPT-11) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The subjects were 20 patients with a performance score of 0–2 with untreated advanced NSCLC. Cisplatin was administered by 5-day continuous intravenous infusion at 20–25 mg/m² per day. CPT-11 was administered by bolus infusion at a starting dose of 20 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 or 60 mg/m² per day on day 1 alone, followed by serial increments of 20 mg/m². Since grade 4 granulocytopenia was observed in two of the five patients receiving 20 mg/m² per day cisplatin (days 1–5) and 100 mg/m² CPT-11 (day 1), and since one of them developed severe pneumonia and sepsis associated with the granulocytopenia, the regimen was considered to be intolerable. In the same patient, grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 diarrhea were observed. Therefore, the optimum dose appeared to be 20 mg/m² per day (days 1–5) for cisplatin and 80 mg/m² (day 1) for CPT-11. The side effects were grade 2 diarrhea in one of three patients, and grade 2 vomiting in three patients, but grade ≥2 hemotoxicity was not observed. This combined regimen resulted in a partial response in 9 out of 19 assessable patients. The dose-limiting factor in this combination therapy was granulocytopenia, and a high efficacy rate was obtained. Received: 14 August 1995 / Accepted: 3 June 1996     

A phase I study of prolonged ambulatory infusion carboplatin with oral etoposide showing activity in prostate cancer

Purpose: This phase I study aimed to establish the dose for phase II trials of a dose-intense outpatient regimen of ambulatory carboplatin and oral etoposide. Patients and Methods: Cohorts of three patients received escalating doses of carboplatin 15, 20, and 23 mg/m²/day as a 3-week continuous ambulatory infusion with oral etoposide initially at 50 mg/day. Patients entered had prostate, colon, head and neck, breast, unknown primary cancers and mesothelioma. Results: At 23 mg/m² of carboplatin, two patients had WHO grade 3 lethargy and myelosuppression, which were the dose-limiting toxicities. Six patients were entered at the dose recommended for phase II studies, carboplatin 20 mg/m²/day and etoposide 50 mg/day for 21 days repeated every 6 weeks. This was well tolerated except for one patient with multiple bone metastases from prostate cancer experiencing grade 4 myelosuppression and a single patient with grade 3 constipation. Seven patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer were entered into the study, one at 15 mg/m², four at 20 mg/m² and two at 23 mg/m² of carboplatin, and received a median of four cycles of treatment. The only responses were seen in prostate cancer where there were two partial responses in patients with soft tissue predominant disease. Five patients who could be evaluated with initially elevated PSA exhibited falls of ≥50% after receiving the chemotherapy. All but one patient with prostate cancer experienced significant reduction in pain levels. The median time to progression of the patients with prostate cancer was 4 months. Conclusions: Ambulatory infusion carboplatin and oral etoposide is a tolerable dose- intense outpatient regimen which warrants further testing in phase II trials including hormone-resistant prostate cancer. Received: 13 March 2000 / Accepted: 26 May 2000     

Initial clinical trial and pharmacokinetics of ThymitaqTM (AG337) by 10-day continuous infusion in patients with advanced solid tumors

Purpose: To establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting and other major toxicities and the major pharmacokinetic parameters of a 10-day infusion of the nonclassical antifolate Thymitaq^TM. Methods: The drug was given by 10-day infusion via a portable pump. The starting dose was 286 mg/m² per day with escalation to 572 and 716 mg/m² per day. Thymitaq in plasma was assayed by a validated isocratic reverse-phase HPLC assay with detection at 273 nm. Results: The dose of 716 mg/m² per day × 10 was considered too high as none of three patients completed a 10-day infusion and two of three developed grade IV myelotoxicity. At 572 mg/m² per day three of four patients completed a 10-day infusion. Dose-limiting myelosuppression was seen in one of four but owing to a high incidence of thrombotic phenomena, no further patients were added. Conclusion: Continuous 10-day infusions of Thymitaq should be limited to low doses until further studies can be done. Received: 4 March 1997 / Accepted: 14 July 1997     

Dose finding study of erlotinib combined to capecitabine and irinotecan in pretreated advanced colorectal cancer patients

Purpose  This study evaluated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of erlotinib when combined to irinotecan and capecitabine in pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Methods  Five dose level combinations with irinotecan (from 180 to 240 mg/m², day 1, q21), capecitabine (1,500–2,000 mg/m² per day, days 2–15, q21) and erlotinib (50–150 mg per day, continuously) were planned. Patients were enrolled in cohorts of three, and evaluated for first cycle acute toxicity. Results  Twenty-one patients were treated. In the first cohort, no DLT was reported, in the second: one DLT (G4 neutropenic fever associated with G3 cutaneous rash and mucositis); in the third dose level: two DLT (G3 diarrhea and G4 neutropenic fever). To confirm these results, other six patients were additionally included and no DLT was observed. Conclusions  The results documented that erlotinib at the dose of 100 mg per day, irinotecan 180 mg/m² and capecitabine 1,500 mg/m² per day for 14 days has an acceptable safety profile and appears suitable for further phase II studies.     

Docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin as treatment for advanced gastric cancer: results of a phase II study

Background: Previous studies have shown that the taxane, docetaxel, is effective in treating gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of docetaxel in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV). Methods: Thirty patients with histologically proven locally advanced and/or metastatic gastric cancer with WHO performance status 0–2 were enrolled and received either 75 or 100 mg/m² docetaxel as a 1-h intravenous infusion on day 1 every 28 days. All patients also received 5-FU (1800 mg/m²) plus LV (500 mg/m²), by continuous intravenous infusion over 24 h on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. Chemotherapy was given for at least two cycles. Results: Of the 25 evaluable patients, 3 showed a complete response, 4 showed a partial response, and 11 patients had stable disease. The overall response rate was 28.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.4, 45.6). The median time to progression was 5.9 months (95% CI, 5.4, 6.5), and the median overall survival was 7.7 months (95% CI, 7.2, 8.3) for the intent-to-treat population. The most frequent grade III and IV hematological toxicities were neutropenia and anemia. Febrile neutropenia was observed in 10% of patients and 2.4% of cycles. The prophylactic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in 3 patients reduced the incidence and severity of neutropenia. Other hematological toxicities were rare. Conclusion: Docetaxel in combination with weekly 5-FU and LV is effective in treating patients with advanced/metastatic gastric cancer. This new docetaxel-containing combination shows promise as a third-generation treatment option for gastric cancer. Received: December 25, 2001 / Accepted: April 22, 2002 Offprint requests to: M. Constenla     

Cisplatin plus continuous infusion vinorelbine for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase I-II study

Backbround In this Phase I/II trial, the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and activity of cisplatin plus vinorelbine (VRL) administered in continuous in-fusion as first-line treatment of advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was determined in 12 consecutive chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced NSCLC. Patients and methods The dose of cisplatin was 100 mg/m² in all patients, and vinorelbine was administered as an initial intravenous (iv) bolus of 8 mg/m² on day 1 followed by a 4-day continuous iv infusion at 4 different 24 h dose levels (DLs) to be repeated every 21 days. All 12 patients (47 cycles) were evaluable for response and toxicity. Results The MTD was 8 mg/m² bolus followed by a continuous iv infusion of 8 mg/m² per day over 4 days. The dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were febrile neutropenia in 4 patients and grade 3 mucositis in 1 patient. There was less neuro-toxicity and compared to the weekly bolus scheme. There was no significant cumulative toxicity after 3 cycles. Partial responses were observed in 6 patients; an overall response rate of 50% (95% CI: 30–65%). Median time to progression was 5,5 months (95% CI: 1,5–11 months) and median survival was 11 months (95% CI: 5–20 months). Conclusions The results demonstrate that, in this setting of first-line treatment of NSCLC, cisplatin plus vinorelbine at 8 mg/m² bolus followed by a continuous infusion of 8 mg/m² per day over 4 days is the recommended schedule. Further trials would be useful to establish activity of this combination.     

Phase I study of amrubicin and vinorelbine in non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy

Background  Combination chemotherapy comprising amrubicin and vinorelbine as a second-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been fully evaluated. To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD), the present phase I study examined patients with advanced NSCLC. Methods  The subjects were nine patients with histologically confirmed advanced NSCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–1, prior platinum-based first-line chemotherapy, and measurable or evaluable lesions. Treatment consisted of five dose levels, with amrubicin 35–45 mg/m² administered as a 5-min intravenous infusion on days 1–3 and vinorelbine 15–25 mg/m² given as a 1-h intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks. Results  All patients had received carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line therapy. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was seen in two of six patients (febrile neutropenia and deep vein thrombosis ) at level 1, allowing us to conduct level 2. At level 2, all three patients experienced DLT (leucopenia ≥4 days in one patient; febrile neutropenia in three patients; and infection in two patients), and this level was determined as the MTD. Subsequently, level 1 (amrubicin 35 mg/m² and vinorelbine 15 mg/m²) was defined as the RD. Responses in the nine patients included a partial response in one patient and stable disease in four patients. Conclusion  As second-line therapy, the RD of the combination of amrubicin and vinorelbine is 35 mg/m² and 15 mg/m², respectively. Further study should proceed to clarify the efficacy of this regimen.     

Phase I/II study of cisplatin, ifosfamide and irinotecan with rhG-CSF support in patients with stage IIIB and IV non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose: We conducted a phase I/II study in previously untreated patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to: (1) determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of cisplatin combined with a fixed schedule of ifosfamide and irinotecan with rhG-CSF support; and (2) to determine the overall response rate and median survival of patients entered on this study. Methods: Ifosfamide (1.5 g/m²) and irinotecan (60 mg/m²) were administered at fixed doses on days 1–4 and on days 1, 8 and 15, respectively. Cisplatin was given on day 1 at 60 mg/m² and was increased in 10-mg/m² increments. This regimen was repeated every 4 weeks. rhG-CSF (nartograstim) was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 1 μg/kg on days 5–18 except on the day of irinotecan treatment. Results: Between June 1995 and April 1998, 46 patients were registered onto this phase I/II study. The MTD of cisplatin was defined according to toxicity and the dose during three courses was increased. Since at the 80 mg/m² dose level more than one-third of the patients were treated with dose modification, the dose of 70 mg/m² was recommended for phase II study. The dose-limiting toxicity was leukopenia. The overall response rate was 62.2% (95% CI 48.0–76.4%), the median response duration was 144 days, and the median survival time was 393 days. Conclusion: For phase II study, we recommend doses of cisplatin 70 mg/m² on day 1 combined with ifosfamide and irinotecan with rhG-CSF support. Both the response rate and preliminary survival data in this study suggest a high degree of activity of this combination in previously untreated NSCLC. Received: 29 April 1999 / Accepted: 15 September 1999     

Dose escalation study of docetaxel and nedaplatin in patients with relapsed or refractory squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus pretreated using cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and radiation

Background Definitive chemoradiation with cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) has been playing an important role in the treatment of esophageal cancer, but some patients are not curable or have recurrent lesions. However, few chemotherapeutic regimens are available for such patients. Docetaxel and nedaplatin are active for esophageal cancer. We conducted a dose-escalation study of docetaxel and nedaplatin as second line-chemotherapy after definitive chemoradiation in patients with relapsed or refractory squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus after chemoradiation. Methods Nedaplatin was administered on day 1 and docetaxel was administered on days 1 and 15, every 4 weeks. Dose escalation was based on the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) observed during the first cycle. Results Twelve patients were enrolled. At a docetaxel dose of 30 mg/m² and a nedaplatin dose of 80 mg/m², one grade 4 neutropenia occurred and caused one treatment break longer than 2 weeks, but there were few DLTs. At doses of 35 and 80 mg/m², respectively, two grade 4 neutropenias and one grade 2 thrombopenia occurred and caused three treatment breaks longer than 2 weeks. Therefore, the maximum tolerated dose was established at this dose level. Two grade 3 anorexias and one grade 3 nausea occurred, but other non-hematological toxicities were generally mild. Responses were seen in one-fourth of the 12 patients, including one complete remission. Conclusion The recommended doses of docetaxel and nedaplatin were 30 and 80 mg/m², respectively. This combination could be a potential second-line treatment for this target population.     

Epirubicin-containing high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transfusion for patients with chemotherapy-sensitive metastatic breast cancer: results of 5-year follow-up

Purpose: Conventional chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer results in very few long-term survivors. With a view to overcoming this problem, we hypothesized that a higher rate of complete response (CR) would lead to more long-term survivors. Therefore, we conducted a phase II study of epirubicin-containing high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) followed by autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transfusion in patients who were sensitive to induction chemotherapy. Methods: The induction chemotherapy consisted of doxorubicin 60 mg/m², cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m² and fluorouracil 750 mg/m² on day 1. Supported by G-CSF, this chemotherapy was repeated for at least three cycles at intervals of 2 weeks until the achievement of >50% tumor regression. The HDC comprised epirubicin 120 mg/m² on day 1, cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg on days 1 to 3 and thiotepa 6 mg/kg on days 1 to 3, followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation and peripheral blood stem cell transfusion. Results: Of 25 patients who achieved a partial response to the induction chemotherapy, 17 were treated with the HDC. Of the 15 patients evaluable for response, 10 achieved a CR (67%), giving an overall CR rate of 43% (10/25). The disease-free survival rate at 5 years was 27%. The median duration of overall survival was 21 months and the overall survival rate at 5 years was 31%. However, the survival curves were not significantly different from those of the historical controls who achieved a CR or PR to conventional chemotherapy. There were three early deaths, one as a consequence of disease progression and two treatment-related (sepsis and heart failure). Diarrhea (grade 3, 76%) and stomatitis (grade 3–4, 29%) were the dose-limiting toxicities. Conclusions: The present study suggests that epirubicin-containing HDC is able to induce a high rate of CR, but its benefit in terms of survival is still unclear. To determine whether HDC can achieve a cure in some patients, further studies in a larger number of patients, with a longer follow-up, are necessary. Received: 23 February 1998 / Accepted: 13 May 1998     

Phase I study of weekly cisplatin, vinorelbine, and concurrent thoracic radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Background The combination of chemotherapy and thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) is considered as a standard treatment for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although the frequent interaction of anticancer agents and irradiation may produce stronger radio-sensitizing effects, the daily administration of these agents is complicated. We therefore used weekly administration of these agents, and conducted a phase I study of weekly cisplatin, vinorelbine, and concurrent TRT. The purpose of this study was to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and the recommended dose of this treatment. Methods Patients with locally advanced NSCLC were enrolled in this study. Both cisplatin and vinorelbine were given intravenously on a weekly schedule for 6 weeks, starting on the first day of TRT, i.e., on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36. The total dose of TRT was 60 Gy. The dose of cisplatin was fixed at 20 mg/m² per week. The starting dose of vinorelbine was 15 mg/m² per week (dose level 1). Results Nine patients were enrolled in this study. All three patients at dose level 1 experienced DLTs. We decreased the dose of vinorelbine to 10 mg/m² per week (dose level 0). Two of the six patients at dose level 0 experienced DLTs. Therefore, dose level 1 was considered as the MTD, and dose level 0 as the recommended dose. The DLTs of this treatment were esophagitis, fatigue, infection, and hyponatremia. Conclusion The recommended dose of cisplatin is 20 mg/m² per week and that of vinorelbine is 10 mg/m² per week with standard TRT. A phase II study of this treatment is warranted. The results of this study were presented in part at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Japan Lung Cancer Society in Fukuoka, Japan, November 21–22, 2002.     

Pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel administered in combination with cisplatin, etoposide and bleomycin in patients with advanced solid tumours

 Purpose: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel and cisplatin administered in combination with bleomycin and etoposide and Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) in patients with advanced solid tumours. Methods: Patients were recruited to a phase I trial where escalating doses of paclitaxel (125 to 200 mg/m²) were administered in combination with etoposide 100 or 120 mg/m², and fixed dose of cisplatin 20 mg/m² and bleomycin 30 mg, with the concomitant use of G-CSF. Paclitaxel (3-h infusion) was followed by 1-h etoposide, 4-h cisplatin and 30-min bleomycin infusions, respectively. Pharmacokinetics sampling for paclitaxel analysis was performed in ten patients from dose levels II–V. Results: The mean paclitaxel area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curves (AUC) for the 125-mg/m² dose level (II) was 7.0 ± 3.6 h μmol⁻¹ l⁻¹, for the 175-mg/m² dose level (III) 10.6 ± 2.8 h μmol⁻¹ l⁻¹, for the 200-mg/m² dose level (IV) it was 16.0 ± 5.0 h μmol⁻¹ l⁻¹, and for the 175-mg/m² dose level (V) it was 12.5 ± 6.1 h μmol⁻¹ l⁻¹. The mean peak plasma concentration (C_max) values for dose levels II–V were 1.9 ± 1.1 μmol/l, 3.4 ± 1.2 μmol/l, 4.3 ± 1.0 μmol/l and 3.8 ± 1.2 h μmol/l, respectively. Conclusion: In this study, relevant pharmacokinetic parameters of paclitaxel like AUC, C_max and the paclitaxel plasma concentration above the pharmacologically relevant 0.1-μmol/l threshold concentration (t > 0.1 μM) when administered in combination with cisplatin, etoposide and bleomycin (PEB) were not statistically different from paclitaxel data of historical controls. However, given the trial design, pharmacokinetic interactions between the agents cannot be excluded. Received: 29 June 1998 / Accepted: 29 January 1999     

Phase I studies of fluorouracil, doxorubicin and vinorelbine without (FAN) and with (SUPERFAN) folinic acid in patients with advanced breast cancer

Purpose: The Breast Cancer Site Group of the National Cancer Institute of Canada – Clinical Trials Group (NCIC-CTG) undertook two parallel phase I studies to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose of vinorelbine in combination with doxorubicin and fluorouracil (with or without folinic acid) in metastatic breast cancer. Methods: Cohorts of five patients were to receive: (a) fluorouracil 500 mg/m² and doxorubicin 50 mg/m² on day 1 only and escalating doses of vinorelbine (15, 20, 25, 30 mg/m²) on days 1, 8 and 15 every 3 weeks (FAN regimen), or (b) fluorouracil 340 mg/m² and folinic acid 200 mg/m² on days 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, doxorubicin 40 mg/m² on day 1 only and escalating doses of vinorelbine (15, 20, 25, 30 mg/m²) on day 1 and again on day 5 every 4 weeks (SUPERFAN regimen). Eligibility included measurable or evaluable metastatic breast cancer and having received neither previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease nor anthracycline-containing adjuvant therapy. Results: Of 26 and 12 patients enrolled in the FAN and SUPERFAN regimens, 26 and 12 were evaluable for toxicity and 21 and 9 for response, respectively. Median ages were 60.3 years (41–71 years) and 64.2 years (51–73 years). Both regimens required amendment after the first cohort with an original day-15 vinorelbine dose omitted from the FAN regimen and more prolonged nadir granulocyte counts allowed. Myelosuppression was dose limiting. MTDs in the FAN and SUPERFAN regimens were vinorelbine 25 mg/m² and 20 mg/m². Other toxicities included mucositis, septicemia and febrile neutropenia. Peripheral neuropathy and constipation were mild. Of the 21 FAN patients evaluable for response, 3 (14%) had complete responses and 7 (33%) had partial responses, for an overall response rate of 48%; 9 (43%) had stable disease and 2 (9%) had progressive disease as their best response. Of the nine SUPERFAN patients evaluable for response, none had a complete response. There were two (22%) with partial responses, and six (67%) had stable disease and one (11%) had progressive disease as their best response. Conclusions: The SUPERFAN regimen was too toxic to pursue even at the lowest dose. The recommended phase II starting dose for the FAN regimen was vinorelbine 20 mg/m². Although these were phase I studies response rates in evaluable patients were less than expected and toxicity did not allow the use of as much vinorelbine in the combinations as had been anticipated. The limited response data from our study would imply that combining vinorelbine with more toxic agents may not enhance response rates and may defeat the advantage of tolerability, especially in elderly patients. Received: 7 December 1996 / Accepted: 8 May 1997