Radiofrequency thermal ablation of liver tumors

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of liver tumors was first proposed in 1990. New technologies enable us to produce liver thermal lesions of approximately 3–3.5 cm in diameter; RFA has consequently become an emerging percutaneous therapeutic option both for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and for non-resectable liver metastases, mainly from colorectal cancer. New devices (for example, triplet of cooled needles, wet needles) and combined therapies (tumor ischemia and RFA) have made it possible to treat large tumors. RFA can be carried out by a percutaneous, laparoscopic or laparotomic approach. Percutaneous RFA can be performed with local anaesthesia and mild sedation; deep sedation or general anaesthesia are also used. The guidance system is generally represented by ultrasound. CT or MR examinations are the more sensitive tests for assessing therapeutic results. The series of patients treated with RFA allow the technique to be considered as effective and safe, achieving a relatively high rate of cure in properly selected cases; it should be classified as curative/effective treatment for HCC, replacing percutaneous ethanol injection. The complication rate of RFA is low but not negligible; key elements in a strategy to minimize them are identified.     

Radiofrequency ablation of liver and lung tumors

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a procedure in which radiofrequency energy is used to heat and destroy abnormal tissue. This article discusses the evolution of RFA and its use to treat liver and lung tumors.     

Radiofrequency ablation of liver and lung tumors

Radiofrequency ablation is an image-guided technique of percutaneous tumor destruction using high frequency alternating current. Accuracy in needle placement and the selection of the imaging modality are key elements of the success of the procedure. The volume of ablation with a single needle insertion is limited to about 40 mm and the technique is most successful for tumors less than 3 cm in diameter with rapid decrease in efficacy for larger tumors. Tumors further away from large vessels are also more efficiently treated with this technique since heat loss from flowing blood in nearby vessels larger than 3mm causes a four-fold increase in treatment failure. Under the best of circumstances (tumor less than 25 mm, away from vessels), RF ablation and surgical tumorectomy have respective failure rates of 6% and 7,3%. RF ablation of an isolated liver metastasis less than 4 cm in diameter results in survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years of 97%, 84% and 40% respectively. In the liver, follow-up imaging is performed to detect residual tumor characterized by early enhancement. Thin peripheral enhancement (less than 1mm) of the necrotic area and well-defined triangular shaped regions of enhancement are not signs of tumor recurrence but indicate the presence of inflammation or arterial to portal venous fistula. In the lung, an area of ground glass attenuation four times larger than the initial tumor is a predictive factor of success. PET-CT is the best imaging modality for follow-up of lung lesions following RF ablation.     

Infected hepatic infarction: an unusual cause of portal venous gas

Portal venous gas is a radiologic finding that usually is due to extrahepatic abdominal processes, most commonly ischemic bowel. In this case report, we present a case of hepatic infarction and fulminant hepatic infection that resulted in extensive portal venous gas.     

Radiofrequency ablation of renal tumors

Percutaneous thermal ablation is increasingly applied in the therapy of renal tumors. Various techniques are available, allowing a safe and accurate therapy of renal tumors either using hyperthermia such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA), laser-induced thermotherapy (LITT) and microwave ablation (MW) or by hypothermia (cryoablation). As thermal ablation is a minimally invasive and nephron-sparing procedure, it is ideally suited for patients with a single kidney, multiple tumors or contraindications for resective surgery. Although cryotherapy is the most extensively studied technique, RFA has become the most accepted thermal ablation technique over the last years. Modern RFA probes allow ablation volumes between 2 and 5 cm in diameter. A major advantage of RFA is the ability to avoid tract bleeding and tumor seeding by coagulating the puncture channel during RF probe withdrawal. The increasing number of clinical reports on RFA of the kidney show the promising potential of renal RFA for minimally invasive tumor treatment. Due to its technical benefits, RFA seems to be advantageous when compared to cryoablation or laser ablation. However, there are no long-term follow-up or comparative data proving an equal effectiveness to surgery.     

Radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors

This article aims to review the state of the art in ablation techniques for hepatic lesions. In addition to discussing the indications, outcomes, and potential complications of the technique, we illustrate the spectrum of imaging findings after treatment. Recent years have seen the development of a wide variety of minimally invasive techniques to treat liver cancer. These include ethanol injection, and thermal ablation using radiofrequency, laser, microwaves, or cryosurgery. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation is one of the most promising non-surgical treatments for hepatic neoplasms. The results of several studies show that radiofrequency ablation enables adequate local control of tumors with few complications, achieving acceptable survival rates. Radiofrequency ablation can be performed using any imaging technique, although it is most commonly performed under ultrasound guidance. CT and MRI show the degree of tumor necrosis better and are more frequently employed in follow up. This article reviews the indications and contraindications for the procedure, potential complications, long-term outcome, and imaging findings for percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors.     

Radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary tumors

The development of image-guided percutaneous techniques for local tumor ablation has been one of the major advances in the treatment of solid tumors. Among these methods, radiofrequency (RF) ablation is currently established as the primary ablative modality at most institutions. RF ablation is accepted as the best therapeutic choice for patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma when liver transplantation or surgical resection are not suitable options and is considered as a viable alternate to surgery for inoperable patients with limited hepatic metastatic disease, especially from colorectal cancer. Recently, RF ablation has been demonstrated to be a safe and valuable treatment option for patients with unresectable or medically inoperable lung malignancies. Resection should remain the standard therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but RF ablation may be better than conventional external-beam radiation for the treatment of the high-risk individual with NSCLC. Initial favourable outcomes encourage combining radiotherapy and RF ablation, especially for treating larger tumors. In the setting of colorectal cancer lung metastases, survival rates provided by RF ablation in selected patients, are substantially higher than those obtained with any chemotherapy regimens and provide indirect evidence that RF ablation therapy improves survival in patients with limited lung metastatic disease.     

Radiofrequency ablation of renal tumors

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of renal tumors is a promising technique that plays a unique and increasingly important role in urologic oncology practices. RFA is appealing as a minimally invasive therapy that may be performed on an outpatient basis. It enables treatment of an area 3 to 5 cm in diameter, with relatively low morbidity and mortality rates. Most interventional radiologists (IRs) are familiar with RFA of liver tumors, and several principles and techniques used in the liver may be extrapolated for use in the kidney. However, it is crucial to bear in mind that local tumor ablation in the kidney presents unique challenges, secondary to the kidney's unique anatomic and physiologic features. Clinical and technical considerations, risks, and complications pertaining to RFA of renal tumors are reviewed here, including approaches commonly used in our practice.     

Radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors

Radiofrequency thermal ablation is receiving increasing attention as an alternative to standard surgical therapies for the treatment of liver neoplasms. Benefits over surgical resection include the anticipated reduction in morbidity and mortality, low cost, suitability for real time image guidance, the ability to perform ablative procedures on outpatients, and the potential application in a wider spectrum of patients, including nonsurgical candidates. This review examines reported clinical results of this new therapeutic technique, potential complications, current limitations, thermal ablation mechanisms, as well as technical features and diagnostic modalities used in the procedure.     

Radiofrequency ablation in a previously irradiated liver

A patient with renal cell carcinoma underwent external-beam radiation therapy (XRT) to treat a painful chest-wall metastasis. One month later, she underwent radiofrequency (RF) ablation of two metastatic deposits within the liver; one of the target lesions was in the recent irradiation zone and the other was outside of the radiation field. RF ablation within the irradiated liver produced a slightly larger ablation zone with prominent needle tract scarring, and required less energy input than treatment in the unirradiated liver. RF ablation and XRT may interact, possibly producing a synergistic effect. Further study of the potentially adjunctive relationship between these two modalities is warranted.     

Radiofrequency thermal ablation of renal tumors

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) of renal malignancies is currently a therapeutic option for patients who are not able to undergo surgery. Some authors consider PRFA as the therapeutic standard in the treatment of renal neoplasms in non-operable patients due to comorbid conditions and in patients with mild-moderate renal failure, to preserve residual renal functionality. The use of PRFA has become more and more widespread due to a rise in the incidental detection of renal cell carcinomas with the ever-increasing use of Imaging for the study of abdominal diseases. Clinical studies indicate that RF ablation is an effective therapy with a low level of risk of complications, which provides good results in selected patients over short and medium term periods of time, however up to now few long-term studies have been carried out which can confirm the effectiveness of PRFA.     

Radiofrequency ablation of liver cancer

The development of image-guided percutaneous techniques for local tumor ablation has been one of the major advances in the treatment of liver malignancies. Over the past two decades, several methods for chemical or thermal tumor destruction have been clinically tested. Among these methods, radiofrequency (RF) ablation is currently established as the primary ablative modality at most institutions. RF ablation is accepted as the best therapeutic choice for patients with early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) when liver transplantation or surgical resection is not suitable options. In addition, RF ablation is emerging as a viable alternative to surgery for inoperable patients with limited hepatic metastatic disease, especially from colorectal cancer. Several series have shown that RF ablation can result in complete tumor eradication in properly selected candidates, and have provided indirect evidence that the treatment improves survival. In this article, we review technique, indications, and clinical results of percutaneous RF ablation in the treatment of HCC and colorectal hepatic metastases.     

Radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of liver tumors in the caudate lobe

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of radiofrequency (RF) ablation for liver tumors located in the caudate lobe. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients (46-79 years of age; median, 70 y), eight with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cirrhosis and two with colorectal metastases in the caudate lobe, were treated with 5.8% NaCl tissue-perfused monopolar (n=7) or bipolar (n=3) RF ablation. The median tumor diameter was 41 mm (range, 25-70 mm). Procedures were performed under ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) guidance in eight and two patients, respectively. One month later, the treatment response was assessed by CT. RESULTS: Transhepatic right intercostal and transomental anterior epigastric routes were used for tumor puncture in eight and two patients, respectively. The entire RF ablation treatment required one or two procedures (median, 1.5), including two to 15 electrode repositionings (median, 6). After RF ablation procedure, one patient experienced jaundice that resolved spontaneously. In one patient, CT follow-up showed asymptomatic segmental biliary duct dilations. Median total hospital stay was 3 days (range, 2-9 d). Complete ablation was achieved in nine of 10 tumors. In one patient, ethanol ablation was necessary to complete RF ablation treatment. After a median follow up of 9.5 months (range, 5-25 mo), three patients remained tumor-free and seven had tumor relapse: two local, four distant, and one mixed. Repeat RF ablation was successfully performed in four cases. CONCLUSION: RF ablation of liver tumors located in the caudate lobe is effective despite the deep location of tumors and the vicinity of major vessels.     

Radiofrequency ablation beyond the liver

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has begun to show promise for extrahepatic indications. Although much of the reported work on image-guided RFA of liver neoplasms is quite promising, it is even earlier in the evaluation and validation process for extrahepatic RFA, with few short-term and no long-term studies reported. Although there are much more data for liver RFA with almost 3,000 cases reported in the literature, there are a number of ongoing investigations of RFA for tumors in the kidney, lung, bone, breast, bone, and adrenal gland. Debulking and pain control with RFA present palliative options becoming increasingly popular weapons in the interventionalist's oncology arsenal. Metastatic disease with a wide variety of primary histologies in a myriad of locations may be treated with RFA after a careful consideration of the risk-to-benefit ratio balance. The RFA technique can be slightly different outside the liver. Specifically, differing dielectric tissue characteristics may markedly alter the RFA treatment. Each different RFA system has a unique risk and advantage profile. Extrahepatic indications and contraindications will be suggested. Treatment tips and the unique complications and considerations will be introduced for some of the more common extrahepatic locations.     

Radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors: variability of lesion size using a single ablation device

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we examined the variability of lesion sizes produced by a single radiofrequency ablation using the same device and algorithm in patients with small malignant hepatic tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of the clinical records of 208 patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation of malignant hepatic tumors during a 6-year period revealed 31 patients with small tumors that were treated with a single ablation. Clinical data were recorded using standardized work sheets. Tumor and lesion sizes after ablation were measured from CT scans. The influences of tumor size, tumor type, presence or absence of cirrhosis, and tissue temperature on the ablation size were analyzed. RESULTS: The size of tumor before treatment ranged from 0.8 to 4.0 cm (mean diameter [+/- SD] = 1.8 +/- 0.9 cm) with corresponding volumes of 0.27-30.24 mL (mean volume = 27.1 +/- 15.9 mL). The lesion sizes after ablation ranged from 1.7 to 5.3 cm (mean diameter = 3.6 +/- 0.7 cm) with corresponding volumes of 2.29-75.87 mL (mean volume = 4.9 +/- 7.1 mL). Tumor type (p > 0.25), presence or absence of cirrhosis (p > 0.45), and tissue temperature (p = 0.055) had no relationship to ablation size. Tumor size had a statistically significant influence on ablation lesion size (p < 0.04). Ablation of small tumors (diameter < or = 2.25 cm, n = 32) produced random lesion sizes whereas ablation of large tumors (diameter > 2.25 cm, n = 11) produced larger lesions (mean diameter = 4.0 +/- 0.8 cm). CONCLUSION: Significant variation occurs in the lesion size produced using the same ablation device and algorithm. These findings must be considered when planning ablation strategies.