Photorefractive keratectomy following undercorrected myopic epikeratoplasties]

Five eyes had a delayed refractive regression following myopic epikeratoplasty; the undercorrection ranged between -8.00 and -10.00 diopters. Four of the 5 eyes had a loss of best spectacle visual acuity of two Snellen lines or more. Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy was performed to achieve a full refractive correction. A dense subepithelial haze was observed in the 5 eyes. The 3 months postoperative refraction ranged between -1.00 D and +2.50 D but the spectacle corrected visual acuity reached only 0.1 to 0.2. Because of the poor visual acuity results, the five epikeratoplasty lenticles were removed, resulting in restoration of best preoperative spectacle visual acuity in 4 of the 5 eyes. Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy was not a helpful means of correcting residual high myopia after myopic epikeratoplasty. The poor results may be explained by the preexisting stromal abnormalities.     

Epikeratoplasty with nonlyophilized tissue in children with aphakia

We studied 75 epikeratoplasty procedures using nonlyophilized tissue performed by eight ophthalmic surgeons in 70 eyes (47 patients) to correct for aphakia in children less than 8 years of age (mean age, 3.4 +/- 2.1 years). Of the 47 patients in the study, 24 were girls and 23 were boys; 23 patients had bilateral surgery. Seven of the epigrafts required removal; two were not replaced, and five underwent successful repeat epikeratoplasty. Overall, the success rate (that is, the percentage of epigrafts that remained optically and functionally clear throughout the course of this study) for the epikeratoplasty procedure was 89% (62 of 70 eyes) for initial surgery and 96% (67 of 70 eyes) for repeat surgery. The average spherical equivalent was +14.4 +/- 3.7 diopters preoperatively and +0.3 +/- 2.9 diopters one year after the operation. One year after the final surgical procedure, 42 of 56 eyes (75%) were within 3 diopters of emmetropia. In the 29 verbal patients, best-corrected visual acuity was 20/100 or better in 25 (86.2%) one year after the operation.     

A comparison of penetrating keratoplasty to epikeratoplasty in the surgical management of keratoconus

Of 40 patients intolerant to contact lenses, 47 eyes with keratoconus were surgically corrected with either epikeratoplasty (N = 31) or penetrating keratoplasty (N = 16). The percentage of eyes in both groups that had visual acuity of 20/40 or better with contact lenses at one year were equal (14 of 15 eyes [93.3%] in the penetrating keratoplasty group; 27 of 29 eyes [93.1%] in the epikeratoplasty group); however, the penetrating keratoplasty procedure resulted in a higher percentage of eyes that had visual acuity of 20/20 than the epikeratoplasty group (11 of 15 eyes [73%] compared with seven of 29 eyes [24.1%], respectively). Both procedures resulted in significant corneal flattening, with the penetrating keratoplasty group producing an average of 3 diopters more keratometric reduction than the epikeratoplasty group one year postoperatively. Although no irreversible graft failures occurred, five of 16 eyes (31%) in the penetrating keratoplasty group had graft reactions. No serious complications were noted in the eyes of the epikeratoplasty group. Both procedures were effective in the surgical management of keratoconus.     

Visual performance after aphakic epikeratoplasty

While good visual acuity and refractive results after epikeratoplasty for aphakia have been reported, particularly for adults and older children, limited detailed information on the nature of the resulting vision is available. We have evaluated the visual performance of seven aphakic subjects corrected by epikeratoplasty by measuring contrast sensitivity, with and without the presence of glare. These results were compared with those for other aphakic corrections, namely spectacles (n = 5 eyes), contact lenses (n = 5 eyes), or intraocular lens implantation (n = 5 eyes). There were statistically significant differences among these four aphakic correction types (p = 0.0330), with a consistent trend for diminished visual performance after epikeratoplasty. Threshold elevations occurred in the presence of glare, but they were not statistically different between the groups (p = 0.1631). Based on these visual assessments, epikeratoplasty does result in statistically significant visual losses. Despite this, it may still offer an acceptable alternative to other managements of the aphakic patient when those others are contraindicated.     

Long-term reversibility of epikeratophakia

PURPOSE: To assess the long-term reversibility of epikeratophakia. METHODS: Three human epikeratophakia lenticules (from 3 patients) were removed 7-14 years after refractive keratoplasty for aphakia (n = 1) and myopia (n = 2). Reasons for removal were irregular astigmatism (n = 1), opacities in the graft and host cornea, and progressive myopia (n = 2). After removal, 2 patients underwent cataract extraction and 1 underwent secondary implantation of AC-IOL. Visual acuity, refraction, keratometry, and corneal topography were assessed before and after removal of the lenticule, as well as after the cataract and IOL implantation, and were compared with the initial visual acuity and corneal curvature before epikeratoplasty. RESULTS: After removal of the lenticule, the 3 patients regained the initial curvature of the cornea (pre-epikeratoplasty), and remained stable during 6 months of follow-up. Initial best-corrected visual acuity and refraction before epikeratoplasty were restored after removal of the epikeratoplasty lenticule in the aphakic patient. Original best-corrected visual acuity was restored in the 2 myopic cataract patients after cataract extraction and IOL implantation. CONCLUSIONS: In a small care series, epikeratophakia was found to be a reversible procedure even after 7-14 years.     

Evaluation of various methods effectiveness for aphakia correction in patients with myopic refraction and glaucoma

The efficiency of various methods for correcting postoperative aphakia was evaluated in 113 patients (118 eyes) with medium and high myopia and glaucoma. In group 1 (44 eyes) extraocular correction of aphakia was planned after cataract extraction, in group 2 (33 eyes) intraocular lenses were implanted, in group 3 (21 eyes) combined interventions were performed (cataract extraction with antiglaucoma component), and in group 4 (20 eyes) cataract extraction was performed simultaneously with sinusotrabeculectomy and intraocular correction of aphakia. The number of patients with visual acuity higher than 0.1 was significantly more in groups 2 and 4 after implantation of intraocular lenses than in groups 1 and 3, who needed extraocular correction of aphakia: 59.1% in group 1, 42.9% in group 3, 78.8% in group 2, and 60% in group 4. Intraocular correction of aphakia in patients with glaucoma and myopia helps attain the maximum possible visual acuity even in patients with far-advanced stages of the disease with residual visual field. Individual approach to estimation of optic force of implanted intraocular lens helps reduce the myopic refraction of the operated eye.     

Epikeratoplasty. The surgical correction of aphakia, myopia, and keratoconus

Thirty-five patients have had 39 consecutive epikeratoplasty procedures (12 adult aphakic, 9 pediatric aphakic, 12 myopic, and 6 keratoconic eyes) by the same surgeon, using commercially prepared lenticules. The lenticule remained totally clear in 85% of eyes. Two lenticules were removed due to infection and scarring; four lenticules had minimal scarring and did not require removal. Spectacle-corrected acuity was worse than one line from the preoperative spectacle-corrected acuity in 58% of the adult aphakic eyes; however, 75% were 20/50 or better postoperatively. Fifty percent were within 2 diopters (D) of emmetropia and 92% within 3 D. All pediatric aphakic patients showed an improvement in best-corrected acuity, and 83% of eyes at 6 months were within 2 D of emmetropia; by 1 year a 3.4-D average myopic shift had occurred. Two of the six eyes (33%) using the original myopia technique were within 2 D of emmetropia, whereas five of the six eyes (83%) with the current technique are within this range. Spectacle-corrected acuity in the entire current myopia group has either improved by one or more lines or has remained unchanged. Five of the six keratoconic eyes had 20/40 or better spectacle-corrected and 20/25 contact lens-corrected acuity postoperatively; average corneal flattening was 6 D. Persistent epithelial defect and irregular astigmatism were the principal factors in delay in visual recovery.     

Secondary Artisan-Verysise aphakic lens implantation

PURPOSE: To evaluate efficacy, predictability and safety of Artisan-Verysise intraocular lens (IOL) secondary implantation for aphakia correction. SETTING: Instituto de Microcirugía Ocular, and Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. METHODS: Uncorrected visual acuity, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refraction, endothelial cell count, and clinical complications were evaluated. Sixteen consecutive eyes of 14 patients with aphakia were submitted to surgery. Postoperative examinations were done at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and every year for at least 3 years. An iris-supported Artisan-Verysise IOL was implanted for aphakia correction. RESULTS: Thirty-six months after Artisan-Verysise lens implantation, BSCVA was 20/40 or better in 6 eyes (37.5%). Preoperatively, 5 eyes had the same BSCVA (31.25%). Mean postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was 0.46 diopter (D). Mean endothelial cell loss was 10.9% 36 months postoperatively. The cell loss occurred predominantly during the first year (7.78%). Cystoid macular edema was observed in 2 cases, 1 of them associated with chronic unresponsive low intraocular pressure. No other serious complications were observed. CONCLUSION: Artisan-Verysise IOL implantation seems a safe, predictable, and effective option for aphakic eyes without capsule support.     

Penetrating keratoplasty vs. epikeratoplasty for the surgical treatment of keratoconus

PURPOSE: Penetrating keratoplasty and epikeratoplasty have been utilized in the surgical treatment of keratoconus. Comparison of the relative efficacy of each procedure in achieving visual outcomes has not been achieved due to limited numbers of cases and follow-up in previous series. METHODS: All patients who underwent either penetrating keratoplasty or epikeratoplasty for keratoconus between January 1987 and December 1997, and for whom at least 24 months of postoperative follow-up data for visual acuity was documented in the medical record, were included in this retrospective, nonrandomized, sequential comparative trial. The sole criteria for outcome in each group, as well as for comparison of the two groups, was Snellen visual acuity measured at the time of each follow-up with the presenting optical aid. RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were met for 443 eyes treated with penetrating keratoplasty and 161 eyes treated with epikeratoplasty. Mean follow-up was 4.3 years for penetrating keratoplasty and 4.5 years for epikeratoplasty. In each group, approximately 50% of the patients chose rehabilitation with optical correction with either spectacles or contact lenses and 50% chose no optical correction. Final median logMAR visual acuity for all patients, irrespective of means of visual rehabilitation, was 0.30 (20/40) for penetrating keratoplasty and 0.40 (20/50) for epikeratoplasty (P < .00005). In 209 penetrating keratoplasty and 77 epikeratoplasty eyes with optical correction, the final median logMAR visual acuity was 0.18 (20/30) for penetrating keratoplasty and 0.40 (20/50) for epikeratoplasty (P < .00005). The final median logMAR visual acuity in 234 penetrating keratoplasty and 84 epikeratoplasty eyes without optical correction was 0.48 (20/60) in both groups (P-value was not statistically significant). CONCLUSIONS: Although penetrating keratoplasty was statistically superior to epikeratoplasty with respect to visual outcome, results with epikeratoplasty were adequate to recommend its use as a surgical alternative in cases when it is not desirable to perform penetrating keratoplasty.     

多焦点人工晶状体植入术后的屈光状态

目的了解白内障摘出多焦点人工晶状体植入术后的属光状态。方法我院行白内障摘出多焦点人工晶状体植入的老年性白内障21例（30眼），在术后3月均采用相同的标准，存暗窄用点状检影镜50em距离进行小瞳孔检影验光，并详细记录屈光度及矫正视力。结果近视14眼，其中9眼为单纯近视，5眼为近视散光；远视7眼，均为远视散光；混合性散光2眼；无屈光异常7眼。裸眼视力：远视力达1．0以上者19眼；0．4—0．8者11眼，其矫正视力有10眼达1．0以上，1眼为0．9。结论白内障摘出多焦点人工晶状体植入明显优于只提高远视力的单焦点人工晶状体。     

Visual recovery in unilateral traumatic pediatric cataracts treated with posterior chamber intraocular lens and anterior vitrectomy in Pakistan

Purpose: To evaluate visual recovery in unilateral traumaticcataracts in children treated with posterior chamber intraocular lensimplantation and anterior vitrectomy.Methods: Sixteen childrenwith unilateral traumatic cataract between ages 3–10 years (mean, 5years 8 months) were treated with posterior chamber intraocular lensimplantation and anterior vitrectomy. Surgery was performed between2 weeks and 7 months (mean, 7.75 weeks) after injury. Follow up wasbetween 9 and 29 months (mean, 17.9 months). Results: The mostcommon postoperative complication was fibrinous uveitis, which developedin 4 children (25%). All eyes had a clear visual axis postoperatively; nonerequired capsulotomy. The mean postoperative refraction was +0.9 diopters(range, +3.50 to -2.75 diopters). Three eyes (18.75%) had visual acuityof 6/9, 8 eyes (50%) had visual acuity of 6/12 or better, and 11 eyes (68.75%)had visual acuity of 6/18 or better. The cause of poor visual acuity was cystoidmacular edema in one eye, macular scars in two eyes, and amblyopia in one eye.Conclusions: Unilateral traumatic cataractsin children in whom aphakia is correctedwith posterior chamber lens implantation combinedwith anterior vitrectomy resultin good visual outcome, and we recommendthis treatment modality in traumaticcataract in children.     

表面角膜镜片术治疗小儿外伤性白内障术后无晶体眼的初步报告

用自制的同种材料的表面角膜镜片，对４３例（４３只眼）小儿外伤性白内障术后无晶体眼施行手术治疗，追踪时间平均２０个月，结果全部镜片透明愈合。有３１例（７２．１％）术后裸眼视力达０．２以上，３２例（７４．４％）矫正视力达０．４以上。大部分病例加载３Ｄ以下的眼镜可达术前的矫正视力，无严重并发症。表明：表面角膜镜片术是治疗小儿外伤性白内障术后无晶体眼的最好办法之一，尤其适用于不能装人工晶体的病例。     

Effect of visual acuity on biometry prediction error after cataract surgery

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of visual acuity on biometry prediction error. SETTING: Postgraduate teaching hospital. METHODS: The study was an observational case series of the first operated eye of 2149 consecutive patients who had cataract surgery. Biometry prediction error was defined as the difference between the planned refraction determined by biometry and the spherical equivalent of the final refraction. The principal outcome measure was the percentage of eyes within +/-1.00 diopter (D) of the intended refraction. This outcome was calculated for patients with visual loss caused by cataract alone, defined as eyes with a postoperative acuity of 6/6 or better, and eyes with different levels of postoperative visual acuity. RESULTS: Complete data were available for 1978 eyes (92%). Of these, 1438 (73%) were within +/-1.00 D of the intended refraction. When the final corrected visual acuity was 6/6 or better, the percentage of eyes within +/-1.00 D of the predicted refraction was at least 78%. When the preoperative acuity was worse than 6/60, 74% in the counting fingers group and 69% in the hand movements group with a final corrected acuity of 6/6 or better were within +/-1.00 D. This trend bordered on statistical significance (P =.05). There was a rapid reduction in the percentage of eyes within +/-1.00 D of the intended refraction as the postoperative acuity decreased because of ocular comorbidity, with a statistically significant difference between eyes with a postoperative acuity of 6/6 or better and each group with an acuity of 6/9 or worse (P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: In eyes without visually significant ocular comorbidity, cataract must reduce vision to 6/60 or worse before there is an increase in biometry prediction error. In contrast, ocular comorbidity that reduces the postoperative acuity causes an early and marked increase in biometry prediction error.     

Bilateral comparison of photorefractive keratectomy for myopia using two excimer lasers.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the results of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in patients who underwent PRK using the Summit Apex (Omnimed) excimer laser in one eye and the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser in the other. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent PRK with the Summit Apex laser (Omnimed) in one eye and the Nidek laser (EC-5000) in the second and had at least 12 months of follow-up were included in this retrospective study (n=30). Uncorrected and spectacle-corrected visual acuity, final spherical equivalent refraction, and grade of subepithelial haze were compared. The average preoperative spherical equivalent refraction of eyes treated with the Summit laser was -6.00 D (range, -2.50 to -8.75 D), and for Nidek-treated eyes it was -5.57 D (range, -2.50 to -8.80 D). RESULTS: Forty-seven percent of Summit-treated eyes and 53% of Nidek-treated eyes had uncorrected visual acuity of 6/6 or better; 61% of Summit-treated eyes and 63% of Nidek-treated eyes had uncorrected visual acuity of 6/7.5 or better; 95% of Summit-treated eyes and 95% of Nidek-treated eyes had uncorrected visual acuity of 6/12 or better (difference not statistically significant). Seventy-three percent of eyes treated with the Summit laser and 80% of eyes treated with the Nidek laser had a postoperative refraction within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia; 97% of Summit-treated eyes and 87% of Nidek-treated eyes had a postoperative spherical equivalent refraction within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia; the difference between the two lasers was not statistically significant. However, the percent of eyes with persistent hyperopia was smaller in the Nidek group after 3 months (P=.0062) and after 6 months (P=.07) than in the Summit group. Videokeratography was not done. CONCLUSION: Both lasers were effective with relatively low side effects. No significant difference was found between the two lasers in postoperative uncorrected visual acuity or refractive outcome. Eyes operated with the Nidek laser had less persistent hyperopia and stabilized earlier.     

The Sivaganga Eye Survey: II. Outcomes and cataract surgery

PURPOSE To assess the clinical outcomes of cataract surgery in rural southern India. METHODS Cluster sampling was used in randomly selecting a crosssectional sample of persons 50 years of age or older for visual acuity measurement, refraction, and ocular examination in 1999. Subjects were queried as to the date and place of surgery for each cataract-operated eye. Surgical complications were noted and the principal cause of reduced vision was identified for eyes with presenting visual acuity worse than 6/18. RESULTS Within the cataract-operated sample of 682 persons, 13.8% had presenting visual acuity worse than 6/60 in both eyes, 25.2% better than or equal to 6/18 in both eyes, and 37.8% were bilaterally operated on. For aphakic eyes, 50.5% presented with visual acuity better than or equal to 6/18; 82.6% with best-correction. For pseudophakic eyes, the corresponding percentages were 78.0% and 94.5%. Over one-third of all eyes were pseudophakic, and nearly threefourths had been operated on in non-governmental facilities. Uncorrected aphakia and other refractive error were the main causes of vision impairment. In multiple logistic regression modeling, poor presenting visual acuity in aphakic eyes was associated with illiteracy, rural residence, and surgery in government facilities; gender and time period of surgery were not predictors of vision outcomes. None of these variables were associated with best-corrected outcomes in aphakic eyes, nor with presenting and best-corrected outcomes in pseudophakic eyes. CONCLUSIONS Visual acuity outcomes in pseudophakic eyes were good. More attention must be given to needless vision impairment among the cataract-operated because of inadequate aphakic correction, especially among those operated on in government facilities, the illiterate, and those living in rural villages.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia of -1.50 to -6.00 diopters

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for the correction of low and moderate myopia and astigmatism using the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser with a modified algorithm. METHODS: Three hundred and ninety-six eyes of 257 patients with myopia ranging from -1.50 to -6.00 D and astigmatism of no more than 4.00 D were included. Manifest spherical equivalent refraction, uncorrected and spectacle-corrected visual acuity were assessed at 1 month (357 eyes, 90%), 3 months (220 eyes, 56%), and 6 months (168 eyes, 42%) after LASIK. RESULTS: Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -3.60 +/- 1.27 D and mean cylinder was -1.01 +/- 1.08 D. Mean postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -0.12 +/- 0.31 D and mean cylinder was -0.19 +/- 0.33 D. At 6 months follow-up, 158 eyes (94%) had a mean postoperative spherical equivalent refraction within +/- 0.50 D of emmetropia; 168 eyes (100%) were within +/- 1.00 D. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 81% (136 eyes) and 20/40 or better in 100%. Two eyes (1.2%) lost 1 line of spectacle-corrected visual acuity due to a decentered ablation. No eye lost 2 or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity. CONCLUSION: Our modified LASIK algorithm with the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser resulted in safe and predictable outcomes for treatment of low and moderate amounts of myopia and astigmatism.     

Visual outcome and complications after cataract extraction in Saudi Arabia.

Cataract is the leading cause of blindness in Saudi Arabia. The author studied 1383 patients who had undergone cataract extraction (total of 1520 procedures) from October 1985 to March 1986 at the King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. All patients were observed for at least two months. Of 1520 eyes 555 (37%) achieved a visual acuity of 20/40 or better, 309 (20%) a visual acuity of 20/50-20/60 after surgery, and 656 (43%) eyes a visual acuity of 20/70 or less. The number of eyes that had intraoperative complications was 176 (12%). The number of eyes that had postoperative complications was 539 (35%). Some eyes had more than one complication. The main factors responsible for failure to achieve visual acuity of 20/40 or better were: (1) error of refraction in 492 (32%) eyes; (2) pre-existing corneal scarring and opacity in 211 (14%) eyes; (3) climatic droplet keratopathy in 134 (9%); and (4) presumed visual loss due to glaucoma in 134 (9%) eyes.     

Retinal detachment after cataract surgery. Surgical results.

The authors studied the results obtained by the Retina Associates in 376 eyes of 361 patients operated on for retinal detachment associated with aphakia or pseudophakia with a postoperative follow-up of at least 6 months. All eyes underwent scleral buckling. The series included 103 eyes with aphakia, 17 eyes with iris-fixated intraocular lens, 111 eyes with anterior chamber (AC) IOL, and 145 eyes with posterior chamber (PC) IOL. The overall success rate for retinal detachment was 93%, without significant difference among the different groups. The aphakia and PC IOL groups had significantly higher prevalence (63% and 60%, respectively) of visual acuity equal to or better than 20/40 compared with the AC IOL group (33%). The prevalence of postoperative corneal edema in the AC IOL group was significantly higher than in the aphakia and PC IOL groups. Preoperative vitreous hemorrhage, large retinal breaks, posterior retinal breaks, total retinal detachment, proliferative vitreoretinopathy, and the need for performing a closed vitrectomy were significant factors in predicting ultimate failure.     

Posterior chamber collamer phakic intraocular lens for myopia and hyperopia.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of correcting refractive errors using a foldable posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens. METHODS: Thirty-four foldable posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses (STAAR Collamer intraocular lens) were consecutively implanted by the same surgeon (PMP) in 19 myopic eyes and 15 hyperopic eyes. In myopic eyes, mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -16.65 +/-3.37 D (range, -8.12 to -21.25 D). In hyperopic eyes, mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was +7.77+/-2.08 D (range, +4.75 to +11.75 D). Mean follow-up was 12 months (range, 6 to 18 mo). Two hyperopic eyes were not included in the data analysis because of removal of the intraocular lens due to pupillary block. RESULTS: Myopic eyes (n=19)-Mean spherical equivalent postoperative refraction was -1.51+/-1.37 D (range, -5.50 to+0.38 D). Postoperative refraction was within +/-0.50 D in 4 eyes (21.05%) and within +/-1.00 D in 8 eyes (42.10%). Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 12 eyes (63.15%) and 20/25 or better in 3 eyes (15.78%). No eye had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better. Spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in all eyes, 20/25 or better in 12 eyes (63.15%), and 20/20 or better in 1 eye (5.26%). Spectacle-corrected visual acuity was unchanged in 10 eyes (52.63%) and improved in 9 eyes (47.36%). A retinal detachment developed in 1 eye (5.26%). Hyperopic eyes (n=15)-Mean spherical equivalent postoperative refraction was +0.02+/-0.64 D (range, -1.00 to +1.50 D). Postoperative refraction was within +/-0.50 D in 9 eyes (69.25%) and +/-1.00 D in 12 eyes (92.30%). Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 6 eyes (46.15%) and 20/25 or better in 3 eyes (20.25%). No eye had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better. Spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 7 eyes (53.84%), 20/25 or better in 6 eyes (46.15%), and 20/20 or better in 2 eyes (15.38%). Spectacle-corrected visual acuity was unchanged in 10 eyes (76.92%), significantly improved in 2 eyes (15.38%), and worse in 1 eye (7.69%). Two of 15 eyes (13.33%) developed a severe pupillary block necessitating removal of the implants. One eye (7.69%) developed an anterior subcapsular cataract. CONCLUSIONS: Refractive predictability appears better for hyeropia than for myopia using the STAAR Collamer foldable posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens. In hyperopic eyes, development of pupillary block may occur.