Psychotic disorders among homeless subjects attending a psychiatric emergency service

Background Homelessness is an increas- ing problem among subjects with severe mental illnesses and little is known about the characteristics of homeless subjects with psychosis using emergency psychiatric services. The aims of the present study were to assess the frequency of psychotic disorders among subjects attending a psychiatric emergency service and to explore the clinical and demographic characteristics of these subjects and the management proposed by the emergency staff. Methods All homeless patients (n = 104) consecutively attending a psychiatric emergency service were included over a 6-month period. Patients were categorised according to ICD-10 diagnoses as presenting with psychotic disorder (schizophrenia and other non-affective psychotic disorders) versus other disorders. A random sample of matched non-homeless controls (n = 71) was included over the same period. Results Nearly one out of three homeless subjects (32.7%) presented with a psychotic disorder, a higher proportion than that found in non-homeless subjects (15.7%). Compared to non-homeless subjects with psychosis, homeless subjects with psychosis were more likely to be male and to present with drug use disorder. The likelihood of being hospitalised after attending the psychiatric emergency services did not significantly differ between the two groups. Compared to homeless subjects with other psychiatric disorders, homeless subjects with psychosis were more likely to be single, to have a history of psychiatric hospitalisation and presented less frequently with anxiety or depressive symptoms motivating admission. Conclusion Most homeless subjects with psychosis attending a psychiatric emergency service were already identified as suffering from a severe mental illness, suggesting that homelessness was a consequence of a break in contact with mental health services. Since homelessness is incompatible with the adequate management of psychosis, strategies have to be developed in mental health organisations in combination with outside partnerships, to drastically reduce the frequency of this condition in subjects with psychosis.     

Homelessness among persons with serious mental illness in an enhanced community-based mental health system

OBJECTIVE: Homelessness and patterns of service use were examined among seriously mentally ill persons in an area with a well-funded community-based mental health system. METHODS: The sample consisted of 438 individuals referred between 1990 and 1992 to an extended acute care psychiatric hospital after a stay in a general hospital. Those experiencing an episode of homelessness, defined as an admission to a public shelter between 1990 and 1993, were compared with those who were residentially stable. Data from a longitudinal integrated database of public mental health and medical services were used to construct service utilization measures to test the mediating effect of outpatient mental health care on preventing homelessness. RESULTS: A homelessness rate of 24 percent was found among the 438 persons with serious mental illness. Those who experienced homelessness were more likely to be African American, receive general assistance, and have a comorbid substance abuse problem. They used significantly more inpatient psychiatric, emergency, and health care services than the subjects who did not become homeless. Forty to 50 percent of the homeless group received outpatient care during the year before and after their shelter episode. The number of persons who received intensive case management services increased after shelter admission. CONCLUSIONS: An enhanced community-based mental health system was not sufficient to prevent homelessness among high-risk persons with serious mental illness. Eleven percent of this group experienced homelessness after referral to an extended acute care facility. Strategies to prevent homelessness should be considered, perhaps at the time of discharge from the referring community hospital or extended acute care facility.     

The emerging role of the social worker in a psychiatric emergency service

A unique round- the- clock service has evolved out of the need to provide extended emergency coverage in the Milwaukee County Mental Health Center despite the dearth of psychiatric personnel. Psychiatric social workers, who see themselves as specialists in social functioning, have developed a combined intake-evaluation unit that sees all walkins, discusses prospective admissions, and considers alternatives to hospitalization. Using crisis intervention-psychiatric emergency criteria, they determine with applicants and referral sources the degree of disruption, the need for immediate action, and the most appropriate facility to handle the current situation. This is seen as a new extension of the traditional social work role, in the context of community mental health developments.Mr. Hyttinen and Mrs. Golan were the first psychiatric social workers instrumental in developing the Psychiatric Emergency Service (PES) and they remain on the part-time staff. The PES has been partly supported by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (R20 MH 01839-04) and is under the overall supervision of Dr. Charles W. Landis, Director, Milwaukee County Mental Health Services.     

Effects of patient and health-system characteristics on community tenure of discharged psychiatric inpatients

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify the differential effect of patient and health-system characteristics on length of stay in the community among recidivist psychiatric patients. METHODS: Data on demographic and clinical characteristics and mental health service utilization were collected for patients with at least one previous psychiatric hospitalization (N=1,972) who visited a psychiatric emergency department at a university hospital in Leuven, Belgium, between March 2000 and March 2002. Logistic regression analysis was used to compare the characteristics of patients with a short (less than two months), intermediate (two to 12 months), or long (12 months or longer) stay in the community between their last hospital discharge and referral to the psychiatric emergency department. RESULTS: One in three patients visited the psychiatric emergency department within 30 days of discharge from a psychiatric hospitalization, and 43 percent of the patients visited within 60 days of discharge. Patients with a short community stay were more likely to be unemployed and to have had a discharge against medical advice, a short previous hospitalization, no aftercare plan, and a history of two or more previous hospitalizations. Longer community stays were predicted by the presence of a personality disorder. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with a history of psychiatric hospitalization, early psychiatric recidivism may be more highly influenced by health-system characteristics than by the presence of severe mental illness.     

Decision to admit in an inner-city psychiatric emergency room: Beyond diagnosis—The psychosocial factors

A one week sample of all patients who presented to the psychiatric emergency room of a large general municipal hospial in an inner-city area were studied. Demographic make-up, clinical picture, nature of coping styles, support systems, social, work, and family adjustment were studied as they related to admission status. Diagnosis, psychiatric history, and clinical status predicted admission as well as the nature of the patient's social functioning, coping style, and community supports. The implications of the socioeconomics of mental health for treatment planning were discussed.     

Factors affecting psychiatric inpatient hospitalization from a psychiatric emergency service

Objective

As a gateway to the mental health system, psychiatric emergency services (PES) are charged with assessing a heterogeneous array of short-term and long-term psychiatric crises. However, few studies have examined factors associated with inpatient psychiatric hospitalization following PES in a racially diverse sample. We examine the demographic, service use and clinical factors associated with inpatient hospitalization and differences in predisposing factors by race and ethnicity.

Method

Three months of consecutive admissions to San Francisco’s only 24-h PES (N = 1,305) were reviewed. Logistic regression was used to estimate the associations between demographic, service use, and clinical factors and inpatient psychiatric hospitalization. We then estimated separate models for Asians, Blacks, Latinos and Whites.

Results

Clinical severity was a consistent predictor of hospitalization. However, age, gender, race/ethnicity, homelessness and employment status were all significant related to hospitalization. Alcohol and drug use were associated with lower probability of inpatient admission, however specific substances appear particularly salient for different racial/ethnic groups.

Discussion

While clinical characteristics played an essential role in disposition decisions, these results point to the importance of factors external to PES. Individual and community factors that affect use of psychiatric emergency services merit additional focused attention.     

Use of PASRR programs to assess serious mental illness and service access in nursing homes

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the implementation of state Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) programs with respect to identification of serious mental illness among nursing facility applicants and residents and access to mental health services. METHODS: A national survey was conducted with representatives from agencies that implement PASRR in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Also, 44 states sent PASRR data for review. Four states were selected for an in-depth study; six nursing homes per state were selected and one staff member from each facility was interviewed (N=24). Medical records were reviewed for 30 to 40 residents from each facility who met criteria for potentially having a disabling serious mental illness (N=786). RESULTS: Medical records showed that 50 percent of patients at the time of admission and 68 percent of patients at the time of the record review had a psychiatric diagnosis, typically a diagnosis of depressive disorder. At the time of admission, fewer records identified individuals with a serious mental illness (9 to 20 percent) or a primary diagnosis of any psychiatric illness (5 to 12 percent). Many records indicated that in-depth, required PASRR screens were not performed. Ninety percent of the states reported that Medicaid covers only basic psychiatric consultation services, such as medication monitoring, in nursing facilities. Between 30 and 32 percent of national survey respondents also characterized access to facilities that provide mental health services as limited and of variable quality. Although all 24 nursing facilities reported providing psychiatric consultation services, access to other mental health services, such as psychosocial rehabilitation or individual counseling, varied considerably. CONCLUSIONS: Nursing facility compliance with administration and documentation of PASRR screens appears problematic. Nevertheless, there do not appear to be excessively high numbers of residents with serious mental illness, suggesting that state PASRR programs may contribute positively to the identification of people with serious mental illness. However, many nursing facility residents have some type of psychiatric illness, and PASRR legislation does not appear to have enhanced their ability to gain access to mental health services beyond standard psychiatric consultation and medication therapy.     

Current practices for mental health follow-up after psychiatric emergency department/psychiatric emergency service visits: a national survey of academic emergency departments

Objective

The objective was to describe continuity of care approaches for psychiatric emergencies in the emergency department.

Methods

A national survey of all 138 academic emergency departments in the United States was conducted.

Results

Most emergency physicians (81%) had no systematic method for identifying psychiatric emergency patients with high recidivism. In order to promote outpatient care, sites commonly reported using intensive interventions, including scheduling outpatient appointments prior to discharge (72%) and in-house case management (64%).

Conclusion

While systematic identification of repeat psychiatric emergency patients was uncommon, emergency departments reported using a variety of fairly intensive strategies to promote continuity of care with outpatient mental health services.     

Predicting aftercare in psychiatric emergencies

Background Aftercare dispositions in psychiatric emergencies have often been limited to the classic armamentarium of admission vs nonadmission. It is unknown to what extent there are differences in predicting follow-up after psychiatric emergency room (PER) visits when focusing on a broader scope of aftercare possibilities. Material and methods This observational study describes and predicts aftercare dispositions after a psychiatric emergency referral: admission, onsite short-term crisis-intervention program (CIP), refusal of any aftercare, and outpatient aftercare. From March 2000 until March 2002, PER patients (N=3,719) of the university hospital were monitored regarding sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and use of health services. Results Forty-four percent were admitted, 38% were referred to outpatient treatment, 9% refused any aftercare, and the remainder was referred to the CIP. Psychotic patients were most likely to be admitted [odds ratios (ORs) between 5.98 and 6.52], followed by patients with suicidal symptoms (OR=2.25) and those who reported outpatient service utilization (OR=1.43). Young patients (OR=3.36) or those with anxiety disorders (OR=2.03) were most likely to be referred for outpatient aftercare. Patients diagnosed with a personality disorder were at highest risk of refusing any aftercare (OR=1.81). Conclusion Despite the existence of a short-term onsite CIP, the majority of the patients were admitted after PER referral. We assume that the existence of this program decreased the number of patients who otherwise would refuse all aftercare. More research is needed in order to explain aftercare dispositions more appropriately.     

Interest in psychiatric advance directives among high users of crisis services and hospitalization

OBJECTIVES: This study examined rates of interest in creating psychiatric advance directives among individuals at risk of psychiatric crises in which these directives might be used and variables associated with interest in the directives. METHODS: The participants were 303 adults with serious and persistent mental illnesses who were receiving community mental health services and who had experienced at least two psychiatric crises in the previous two years. Case managers introduced the concepts of the directives and assessed participants' interest. The associations between interest in the directives and demographic characteristics, psychiatric symptoms, level of functioning, diagnosis, history of hospitalizations, history of outpatient commitment orders, support for the directives by case managers, and site differences were examined. RESULTS: Interest in creating a directive was expressed by 161 participants (53 percent). Variables significantly associated with interest were support for the directives by a participant's case manager and having no outpatient commitment orders in the previous two years. Reasons for interest included using the directives in anticipation of additional crises and as a vehicle to help ensure provision of preferred treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial interest in psychiatric advance directives was shown among individuals with serious and persistent mental illness. The results strongly suggested that attitudes of clinicians about psychiatric advance directives are associated with interest in the directives among these individuals. Therefore, it is important to educate clinicians and address their concerns about the directives so that they can more comfortably support creating the documents. A shift in values may also be necessary to more consistently recognize and honor patients' treatment preferences as specified in the directives.     

Observation levels in acute psychiatric admissions

It was our objective to compare the influence of patients’ variables and circumstances of admission on the use of observation levels in acute psychiatric admissions in a British mental health unit. We performed a prospective case note survey of all acute psychiatric admissions during 28 consecutive days in June and July 1991 within a large teaching hospital and a traditional psychiatric hospital in Nottingham, England. We compared, the demographic characteristics of 88 consecutive admissions, admission procedures, clinical data, initial observation levels and changes in observation levels. As for the results, most patients were admitted outside of regular working hours (weekends or after 5 p.m.). Most patients were placed on intermediate (close) observation. The most important factor associated with the choice of observation level was the legal status of the patient (χ² = 14.79, df = 2, p < 0.001, Fisher’s exact test p < 0.0001). There were significantly fewer incidents (χ² = 7.72, df = 2, p < 0.05, Fisher’s exact test p < 0.01) on the highest (special) category of observation. The observation policy of the unit was not followed consistently. The number of factors contributing to the choice of observation levels reflects the complexity of the task facing the staff. Special observation is an effective method of managing acutely disturbed patients. The time of admission of most patients implies that more trained staff should be provided outside of regular hours. Clinical staff should be regularly trained in the use of observation procedures. It should be a regular topic in clinical audit. Received: 10 March 1998 / Accepted: 9 November 1998     

Outcome of 89 psychiatric emergencies managed by 3 mental health centers in an emergency service]

This paper deals with the assessment after 2 years of the outcome of 89 psychiatric emergencies taking in charge in Saint-Luc hospital's (Brussels) emergency room, by 3 community mental health services. After the triangulation of the demand, in the emergency room, 91% of the patients go to the community mental health service. In 92.5% of cases, the crisis intervention is carried out by the same therapists they met in the emergency room with the collaboration of other members of the outpatient team. Crisis interventions are brief (less than 3 months) in 50% of cases, less than 1 years in 11.5% of cases and lead in 35% of cases to long-term in charge (more than 2 years: psychiatric and social follow-up).     

A comparative study of psychiatric outpatient treatment in two geographically defined populations

Asignificant change in the pattern of psychiatric care has taken place over the last decade, including the reorganization of the traditional mental hospitals, the establishment of psychiatric wards in general hospitals, the trend toward outpatient as opposed to inpatient care, and the increasing recognition of the importance of community psychiatry.^1–4 But few attempts have been made to discern whether categories of patients get the same treatment at different types of outpatient clinics. It would be interesting to know if, for example, a psychotic patient will get similar treatment and have a similar chance for admission in a community-oriented clinic and an outpatient clinic affiliated with a hospital.The present investigation was carried out in order to describe the demographic and diagnostic characteristics of psychiatric patients treated at two types of outpatient clinics and to compare the psychiatric service of a clinic affiliated with a psychiatric ward at a general hospital to a clinic forming part of a community psychiatric project. Recent data concerning general information about both these services have been published by Kastrup et al.⁵ and Nielsen.⁶     

Nurses as psychiatric consultants in a general hospital emergency room

Psychiatric nurses' experience in milieu therapy, home treatment, community aftercare, and psychotherapy can be the basis for new roles in mental health. This study used psychiatric nurses as consultants to general physicians in a general hospital emergency room. Psychiatric nurses successfully managed 66% of the psychiatric referrals in the emergency room and required only telephone consultation in a majority of the remaining cases to develop and implement a satisfactory treatment plan. The resistance to using nurses in this new role seems a result of anxiety generated in the emergency room staff and physicians. Sensitivity to these discomforts reduces “undermining” behavior and provides the opportunity for new roles to develop, be defined, and be accepted.     

Characteristics of patients presenting for emergency psychiatric assessment at an English hospital

OBJECTIVE: The needs and characteristics of patients who are referred for psychiatric emergency services vary by the source of referral. Such differences have wider implications for the functioning of the mental health care system as a whole. This study compared three groups of patients in a two-month cohort of 189 patients who were referred for emergency psychiatric assessment at a hospital in England: those who were referred by general practitioners (family physicians), those who were receiving specialist services from community mental health teams, and those who arrived at the hospital from the broader community. METHODS: The three groups were compared on demographic characteristics, clinical and service use variables, risk to self or others, factors that contributed to the emergency presentation, and ratings on standardized scales of functioning. RESULTS: The patients who were receiving specialist services from community mental health teams had high rates of psychosis, often relapsed, and had a history of contact with a psychiatrist. These patients were the most likely to be admitted to the hospital after emergency assessment. The patients who had been referred by general practitioners tended to have fewer indicators of social problems and were more likely to be experiencing a new episode of mental illness. Their referral to the emergency department was most likely to be deemed inappropriate by emergency department clinicians. The patients who came from the broader community were more likely to be male and to exhibit self-harming behavior, substance misuse, and behavioral difficulties. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of emergency referral is one indicator of the functioning of the service system as a whole. Improvements to the system should include better access to community mental health team services and a greater capacity of the primary care system to manage mental health crises. Services need to be developed that are acceptable to male patients who are experiencing social and behavioral problems.     

The nature of help-seeking during psychiatric emergency service visits by a patient and an accompanying adult

Utilization rates for urban psychiatric emergency services remain high, and the decision to seek care in this setting is poorly understood. Three hundred individuals accompanying patients to a psychiatric emergency service were interviewed about their help seeking and choice of treatment setting. Twenty-three of the interviewees (7.7 percent) were caregivers accompanying patients with severe and persistent mental illness. They were significantly more likely than other interviewees to know the difference between psychiatric emergency services and services offered by other outpatient providers. More than half reported that the patient they accompanied was intermittently noncompliant, which required visiting either a walk-in service during a moment when the patient was cooperative or a facility equipped to provide involuntary treatment.     

Emergency psychiatric assessment of violence

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to 1) ascertain whether there are clinical and demographic characteristics that distinguish dangerous from nondangerous patients evaluated in a psychiatric emergency service and 2) identify variables that distinguish dangerous patients who are hospitalized form those who are not. METHOD: The authors conducted a case comparison study of 99 psychiatric emergency patients whom staff identified as dangerous to others, that is, violent or potentially violent. Clinical staff were interviewed and records reviewed. These data were contrasted with record review data for 95 nondangerous patients. RESULTS: Log linear analysis showed that 1) variables relating to violence in community samples--age, sex, and past history of violence--related minimally or not at all to violence in this sample and 2) disposition to hospital versus community was associated with psychotic mental status and restraint in the psychiatric emergency service. Patients requiring restraint were more likely to have recently committed assault or battery and to have been brought in by the police. CONCLUSIONS: Enduring personal characteristics of patients relate neither to psychiatric emergency service assessments of current dangerousness nor to the decision to hospitalize. These determinations appear to be related to assessments of current patient state and immediate past behavior.     

What the neighbors think: Community attitudes toward local psychiatric facilities

We conducted a telephone survey in three boroughs of New York City to assess the impact of proximity to psychiatric facilities on attitudes toward the mentally ill. Six pairs of areas were selected for sampling; within pairs, one area included a facility serving chronically ill psychiatric patients and the other contained no health or mental health facility. Three-quarters of those living within a block of the selected facilities were found to be unaware of their presence. Further, attitudes toward mental illness and patients were not related to proximity to such facilities. These results cumulatively suggest that community psychiatric facilities do not necessarily constitute a personal or community burden as far as the neighbors are concerned.This study was partially supported by Biomedical Research Support Grant Funds.     

The new asylums in the community: severely ill psychiatric patients living in psychiatric supported housing facilities. A Danish register-based study of prognostic factors, use of psychiatric services, and mortality

Introduction

Reorganization of psychiatric treatment in Denmark involved a declining number of psychiatric long-stay beds and an increasing number of psychiatric supported housing facilities in the community. Very few studies have focused on the population in such facilities.

Methods

Information was generated combining addresses of supported psychiatric housing facilities with information from the Danish Civil Registration System to create a case register of persons living in supported psychiatric housing facilities. Through linkage with the Danish Psychiatric Central Register, we examined predictors of becoming a resident in a psychiatric housing facility, use of psychiatric services around the time of entrance to a supported psychiatric housing facility, and mortality rates for residents in a psychiatric housing facility compared to non-residents and to persons in the general population who never experienced a psychiatric admission.

Results

We identified schizophrenia as the strongest diagnostic predictor of becoming a resident in a supported psychiatric housing facility, followed by organic mental disorders, substance abuse, and affective disorder. In addition, the higher the number of psychiatric bed days, the higher the risk. Compared to the years before the first entrance to a supported psychiatric housing facility, the number of bed days in the year following the first entrance dropped more among residents than among comparable psychiatric patients. Mortality rates were slightly higher among residents in a supported psychiatric housing facility than among comparable psychiatric patients, but more than tenfold higher when compared to the general population of Danes.

Conclusion

The vast majority of persons who became residents in supported psychiatric housing facilities had previously been diagnosed with schizophrenia, schizophrenia-like disorders, and organic mental disorders, and a large proportion had substance abuse and a high use of bed days. Moving into such a facility reduced the number of bed days.