The effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on blood pressure in hypertensive patients

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are ubiquitous medications used by a wide range of people from otherwise healthy normotensive patients to hypertensive patients with many significant comorbidities. Through a variety of mechanisms related to prostaglandin inhibition, including sodium retention and vasoconstriction, these agents may increase blood pressure. This leads to potentially detrimental effects. A review of the current literature regarding this topic yielded 2 meta-analyses and 10 randomized controlled trials. There is evidence of small blood pressure increases in normotensive patients taking NSAIDs approximating +1.1 mm Hg. Patients with treated hypertension show variable increases with NSAID treatment, ranging up to +14.3 mm Hg for systolic pressure and +2.3 mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure. Most antihypertensive medications seem to have decreased effects with concomitant NSAID administration, with the exception of calcium channel blockers. Given the current literature, it appears that NSAIDs increase blood pressure in patients with controlled-hypertension, but the quantity of this increase is variable. If possible, patients who have hypertension should avoid taking NSAIDs.     

Lack of control of high blood pressure and treatment recommendations in Canada

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a major risk factor for death that affects many Canadians, but only 16% of hypertensive Canadians are treated and have their hypertension controlled. While the control rate is very low, the 2001 Canadian Hypertension Recommendations do not recommend that low risk hypertensive patients be started on pharmacotherapy, and pharmacotherapy is not recommended for people for whom there is no demonstrable benefit from randomized, controlled trails. OBJECTIVES: To determine the proportion of hypertensive patients who are appropriately managed according to the 2001 Canadian Hypertension Recommendations. METHODS: Data from the Canadian Heart Health Survey, which surveyed a cross-sectional population (n=23,129) between 1986 and 1992, were used to determine the proportion of nondiabetic hypertensive patients who are managed according to the 2001 Canadian Hypertension Recommendations. Hypertensive patients not recommended to receive pharmacotherapy include those without risk factors and target organ damage, with a diastolic blood pressure of 90 to 99 mmHg and a systolic blood pressure of less than 160 mmHg. People with diastolic blood pressures of less than 90 mmHg who have systolic blood pressures of 140 to 159 mmHg are also not recommended to have pharmacotherapy. Patients prescribed antihypertensive therapy who had blood pressure controlled to less than 140/90 mmHg were assessed as having their hypertension managed appropriately, as were those who were not treated and were not recommended to be prescribed treatment. RESULTS: There were 58,813 (1.7%) hypertensive patients who did not have target organ damage or additional risk factors, and had a systolic blood pressure of less than 160 mmHg and a diastolic blood pressure between 90 and 99 mmHg. Twenty four per cent of hypertensive persons (831,787) had a systolic blood pressure of 140 to 160 mmHg and a diastolic blood pressure of less than 90 mmHg. About 25% (23.6%+1.7%) of hypertensive Canadians in the Canadian Heart Health Survey are not recommended to be prescribed antihypertensive therapy according to the 2001 Canadian Hypertension Recommendations. Sixteen per cent of hypertensive patients were treated and had their blood pressures controlled (blood pressure less than 140/90 mmHg). Therefore, about 41% (ie, 16%+25%) of hypertensive patients are appropriately managed according to the 2001 Canadian Hypertension Recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the Canadian Heart Health survey indicate that there are a striking number of Canadians with untreated high blood pressure (59%) who probably do not have their hypertension managed according to the 2001 Canadian Hypertension Recommendations. Greater efforts are required to identify people with hypertension, and to ensure that they are managed according to the best available evidence.     

Antihypertensive effects of low doses of hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive black Zimbabweans.

The antihypertensive effects of low doses of hydrochlorothiazide have not been examined in black African hypertensive patients although hydrochlorothiazide is commonly used as first-line therapy. The antihypertensive effects of hydrochlorothiazide in a daily dose of 6.25, 12.5, 25 and 50 mg were examined in 19 black Zimbabwean hypertensive patients in a double-blind, random order, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. The mean systolic blood pressure on placebo was 170.2 mmHg (95% CI +/- 9.0 mmHg) and on daily doses of hydrochlorothiazide decreased to: 161.1 mmHg (95% CI + 10.0 mmHg) on 6.25 mg; 156.6 mmHg (95% CI +/- 8.6 mmHg) on 12.5 mg; 154.9 mmHg (95% CI +/- 8.5 mmHg) on 25 mg and 149.1 mmHg (95% CI +/- 9.2 mmHg) on 50 mg. The mean diastolic blood pressure on placebo was 101.4 mmHg (95% CI +/- 5.0 mmHg) and decreased to: 98.0 mmHg (95% CI +/- 5.7 mmHg) on 6.25 mg; 96.1 mmHg (95% CI +/- 4.5 mmHg) on 12.5 mg; 93.6 mmHg (95% CI +/- 5.3 mmHg) on 25 mg and 90.5 mmHg (95% CI +/- 3.9 mmHg) on 50 mg. Hydrochlorothiazide in doses of 25 mg and 50 mg decreased systolic and diastolic blood pressure and the 12.5 mg dose decreased systolic blood pressure significantly more than placebo. We conclude that in this population maximum antihypertensive effect is not seen with the lower doses of hydrochlorothiazide and 25 mg is an appropriate starting dose for most patients.     

Non-pharmacological treatment of hypertension in primary health care: a 2-year open randomized controlled trial of lifestyle intervention against hypertension in eastern Finland

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether lifestyle counselling is effective in non-pharmacological treatment of hypertension in primary health care. DESIGN: Open randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Ten municipal primary health care centres in eastern Finland. PATIENTS: Seven hundred and fifteen subjects aged 25-74 years with systolic blood pressure 140-179 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure 90-109 mmHg or antihypertensive drug treatment. INTERVENTIONS: Systematic health counselling given by local public health nurses for 2 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood pressure, lipids and lifestyle data were collected annually. RESULTS: Among participants with no antihypertensive drug treatment, the net reductions after 1 year both in systolic blood pressure [-2.6 mmHg; 95% confidence interval (CI), -4.7 to -0.5 mmHg] and in diastolic blood pressure (-2.7 mmHg; 95% CI, -4.0 to -1.4 mmHg) were significant in favour of the intervention group. This difference in blood pressure change was maintained during the second year. In participants with antihypertensive drug treatment, no significant difference in blood pressure reduction was seen between the groups during the study. CONCLUSIONS: A relatively modest, but systematic counselling in primary health care can, at least among untreated hypertensive subjects, produce reductions in blood pressure levels that are modest for the individual, but very important from the public health point of view.     

Effect of Ketoprofen on Blood Pressure, Endocrine and Renal Responses to Chronic Dosing with Captopril in Patients with Essential Hypertension

The effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on the blood pressure and renal function of essential hypertensive patients depend on the specific type of NSAID and antihypertensive drug administered. Twelve patients with essential hypertension, aged 35 to 59 years, stabilized (blood pressure less than 140/90 mmHg) with captopril, received ketoprofen (100 mg bid for 7 days) or matching placebo in a randomized double-blind cross-over fashion. A 3-week wash-out period was included between treatment periods. Blood pressure on the first and last days of the placebo treatment period (137± 7(SD)/80±8 and 139±11/81±9 mmHg) was similar to respective values during ketoprofen therapy (136±10/79±7 and 143 ± 10/81 ± 9 mmHg). The mean differences in systolic and diastolic blood pressures, at the end of the treatment periods, between ketoprofen and placebo were 4(95% confidence intervals -5, +13) and 0(-8, +8) mmHg, respectively. Ketoprofen had no effect on 24-h urinary sodium excretion (160 ± 33 and 147 ± 39 mmol/24 h for ketoprofen and placebo, respectively). Ketoprofen was without effect on glomerular filtration rate, renal plasma flow and filtration fraction. In conclusion, our data suggest that ketoprofen is a safe choice when short-term treatment with a NSAID is indicated in an essential hypertensive patient treated with a converting enzyme inhibitor such as captopril.     

Use of statins and blood pressure

BACKGROUND: Markers of inflammation such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) were shown to be elevated in patients with hypertension. Small trials using statin therapy showed blood-pressure (BP) reductions, but it is unknown whether this association extends to larger populations. The objective of this study was to determine whether statin use was associated with better blood-pressure control in adults with hypertension and whether inflammation levels mediated this relationship. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 2584 hypertensive adults aged >or=40 years with no known cardiovascular disease from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2002. Logistic regression models were calculated to determine whether there was an association between statin use and blood-pressure control. C-reactive protein was added to the full model to determine its impact on the association. RESULTS: Compared with people not using statin medication, significantly more statin users had their blood pressure under control (52.2% v 38.0%). After adjustment for demographic factors, statin users were two times (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46 to 2.72) more likely to have their blood pressure under control (<140/90 mm Hg) than nonusers. After further adjustment for body mass index, diabetes, smoking, exercise, low-salt diet, and antihypertensive medications, the likelihood of having blood pressure under control remained more likely among statin users (odds ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.05 to 2.05). The association between statin use and lower BP was most evident among participants who used antihypertensive medication as well as statins and was unchanged with the addition of CRP to the model. CONCLUSIONS: Statin use was associated with a BP level <140/90 mm Hg in a representative sample of US adults with hypertension. Levels of CRP did not attenuate the association. Further studies are needed to explore the effects of statin use on blood pressure and to determine how best to apply this knowledge in clinical care.     

Effectiveness of hypertension treatment assessed by blood pressure level achieved in primary care setting in Poland

The effectiveness of hypertension treatment remains low in many developed countries. The aim of our study was to evaluate the treatment effectiveness in hypertensives treated by general practitioners (GPs) in Poland. Twenty thousand three hundred and five hypertensive patients (mean age 60.1 +/- 12.0 years, 9918 women, 10 387 men), pharmacologically treated by 677 GPs in Poland, were investigated. Blood pressure (BP) in every patient was measured twice, within approximately a 5-min interval, in a seated position, using a mercury sphygmomanometer, after a rest of at least 10 min. Mean blood pressure from both measurements was used for further analysis. Measurements were carried out by a GP in the office. Every physician investigated 30 consecutive hypertensive patients. Of the investigated hypertensive patients treated, 8.3% had systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 90 mmHg (7.8% in women, 8.8% in men respectively; p > 0.05). Mean SBP in the investigated group was 161.9 +/- 20.4 mmHg, 162.7 +/- 20.8 mmHg in women and 161.1 +/- 20.1 mmHg in men, respectively; p < 0.05. Mean DBP was 95.4 +/- 11.0 mmHg. The difference between mean DBP in women (95.3 +/- 11.0 mmHg) and men (95.5 +/- 11.1 mmHg) was not significant, p > 0.05. Mean pulse pressure (PP) for the whole group was 66.5 +/- 16.3 mmHg. In this cohort, 26.7% of patients were treated with one, 37.6% with two, 26.7% with three, 8.2% with four and 0.8% with five antihypertensive drugs. Mean number of antihypertensive drugs prescribed for one hypertensive patient was 2.2 +/- 1.0. Effectiveness of hypertension treatment by GPs in Poland remained unsatisfactory despite frequent implementation of combined antihypertensive drug therapy.     

Antihypertensive medication adherence and blood pressure control among central Alabama veterans

Medication nonadherence is associated with adverse outcomes. To evaluate antihypertensive medication adherence and its association with blood pressure (BP) control, the authors described population adherence to prescribed antihypertensive medication (proportion of days covered ≥80%) and BP control (mean BP <140/90 mm Hg) among central Alabama veterans during the fiscal year 2015. Overall, 75.1% of patients receiving antihypertensive medication were considered adherent, and 66.1% had adequate BP control. Patients adherent to antihypertensive medication were more likely to have adequate BP control compared with patients classified as nonadherent (67.4% vs 62.0%; adjusted odds ratio 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.22–1.44 [P<.0001]). Among patients who had uncontrolled BP, 73.6% were considered adherent to medication. Adherence to antihypertensive medication was associated with adequate BP control; however, a substantial proportion of patients with inadequate BP control were also considered adherent. Interventions to increase BP control could address more aggressive medication management to achieve BP goals.     

伴阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征高血压患者的血压控制研究

目的探讨伴阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征(OSAHS)的高血压患者,同时服用降压药和接受持续气道正压通气(CPAP)是否能有效控制血压。方法选取2014年1月至2015年6月南京医科大学第一附属医院睡眠中心就诊的伴有OSAHS高血压患者180例,根据服用降压药物后血压是否被有效控制,分为控制组(n=87)和未控制组(n=93),两组在服用降压药同时接受CPAP 6个月,比较服用不同降压药方案和CPAP治疗前后血压是否得到有效控制的关系。结果所有患者共使用13种不同的降压药方案进行治疗。控制组与未控制组患者降压药方案差异无统计学意义(P0.05),多因素logistic回归分析表明降压药方案不是影响伴OSAHS高血压患者血压控制的独立预测因子(OR=1.897,P=0.094)。使用CPAP后控制组、非控制组夜间收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)均下降,差异有统计学意义(P0.01)。结论伴OSAHS高血压病患者的降压治疗方案与血压控制无明显相关性,而CPAP治疗可使降压药有效组和无效组患者的夜间血压都降低。     

Patients with uncontrolled hypertension or concomitant hypertension and benign prostatic hyperplasia

At optimal doses, individual antihypertensive agents lower blood pressure (BP) by an average of 10 mmHg. Many patients with hypertension, including those with stage 3 hypertension, target organ damage, or those at high risk for cardiovascular events and/or adverse effects of high-dose monotherapy, are likely to require combination antihypertensive drug treatment to achieve the recommended systolic/diastolic BP (< 140/90 mmHg). Two studies, a placebo-controlled, double-blind trial (n = 70) and a community-based, open-label trial (n = 491) investigated the antihypertensive efficacy of doxazosin, a long-acting selective alpha1-adrenoceptor blocker, as add-on therapy for uncontrolled hypertension with other antihypertensive medications and in patients with concomitant benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and treated but inadequately controlled hypertension, respectively. The addition of doxazosin to baseline antihypertensive medication(s) significantly lowered BP and had a significantly positive effect on the serum lipid profile. In patients with concomitant BPH, doxazosin significantly improved all BPH symptom scores, regardless of initial symptom severity. Add-on doxazosin sufficiently reduced systolic/diastolic BP such that many patients whose hypertension was previously uncontrolled by other antihypertensive medications were able to reach goal BP (< 140/90 mmHg). Doxazosin as add-on therapy was well tolerated. In conclusion, doxazosin as add-on therapy improves BP control in hypertensive patients not at goal BP and improves lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with concomitant BPH.     

Identification of hypertension in hospitalized children prescribed as‐needed antihypertensive medication

Imperfect measurement conditions, transient blood pressure (BP) elevation due to pain or anxiety, and heavy clinical demands complicate hypertension (HTN) diagnosis in hospitalized children, and may prevent recognition of hypertensive episodes for children prescribed as‐needed (PRN) antihypertensive medication. The authors sought to describe the incidence and predictors of missed BP elevation among hospitalized children prescribed PRN antihypertensive medication at our hospital. BP data were retrospectively audited for children age 2‐18 admitted in 2018 to the general ward, and prescribed PRN oral nifedipine, intravenous [IV] or oral hydralazine, or IV labetalol. Appropriate recognition of BP elevation (exceeding the parameters in the medication order) was defined as administering medication within the ordered dosing interval, administering the medication earlier than planned, or physician documentation of why HTN treatment was withheld. Mixed‐effects logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with recognition of BP elevation. Fifty‐six hospitalizations including 616 BP measurements were analyzed. BP elevation was appropriately recognized in 230 (37%) instances, in most of which (n = 190) the antihypertensive medication was given after excessive BP was noted. On multivariable analysis, higher systolic BP and BP elevation occurring at night were associated with increased likelihood of appropriate recognition. BP elevations are frequently missed in hospitalized children prescribed PRN antihypertensive medication. Particularly, there was low recognition of diastolic BP elevation and of systolic BP elevation close to but still exceeding the ordered threshold. Further staff education may be needed to raise awareness of lower BP thresholds for HTN in younger and smaller children.     

Maternal age in pregnancy and offspring blood pressure in childhood in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC)

Associations between maternal age in pregnancy and offspring blood pressure (BP) at age 7(1/2) were investigated in 7623 singletons from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). In models adjusted for age and sex there was an inverse relationship between maternal age and BP in children: beta = -0.06 mmHg per year of maternal age (95% CI -0.10 to -0.01, P = 0.02) for systolic BP and beta = -0.04 (95% CI -0.07 to -0.01, P = 0.02) for diastolic BP. However, this association disappeared after adjustment for confounding factors: beta = -0.02 mmHg per year of maternal age (95% CI -0.07 to 0.04, P = 0.5) for systolic BP and beta = -0.03 (95% CI -0.07 to 0.01, P = 0.2) for diastolic BP. We conclude that there is no evidence of a relationship between maternal age in pregnancy and childhood BP in this contemporary birth cohort.     

Factors related to poor control of blood pressure with antihypertensive drug therapy

OBJECTIVES: To study the associations of patient-related and perceived healthcare-related factors with the control of blood pressure. SUBJECTS: Physicians identified all of the hypertensive patients they saw during I week in 26 health centres. Out of 2,219 patients, 80% agreed to participate, 88% of which took antihypertensive medication. METHODS: In this cross-sectional questionnaire study, based on 82 opinion statements, 14 problem indices were formed using factor analysis. Logistic regression models were used to study the associations with blood pressure control. RESULTS: Eighty per cent of the men and 79% of the women had poor blood pressure control (BP > or = 140/90 mmHg). High levels of hopelessness towards hypertension (adjusted OR 2.16; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20-3.88) as well as medium and high levels of frustration with treatment (adjusted OR 1.50; 95% CI 1.04-2.18 and OR 1.83; 95% CI 0.98-3.44) were associated with poor control. The perceived tension with blood pressure measurement (adjusted OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.08-2.36) was similarly associated with poor control. Non-compliance in men, old age and monotherapy were also associated with poor blood pressure control. CONCLUSION: Hopelessness, frustration with treatment, and perceived tension with blood pressure measurement are associated with poor blood pressure control.     

How good is blood pressure control among treated hypertensive children and adolescents?

BACKGROUND: Since good control of arterial hypertension is of paramount importance, the present study was carried out to evaluate blood pressure control in pediatric patients with hypertension receiving regular medical care. STUDY DESIGN: The charts of 80 hypertensive children receiving medical care were reviewed. Their antihypertensive medication had been stable during three or more separate clinic visits and during 3 or more months. Patients with office hypertension were excluded. RESULTS: Blood pressure values higher than the corresponding 95th centiles were noted in 20 of the 80 patients. Hypertension was systolic in seven, diastolic in four and both systolic and diastolic in nine patients. The number of prescribed antihypertensive drugs and the number of doses/day of prescribed antihypertensive drugs was similar in patients with good and in those with poor blood pressure control. Plasma creatinine was higher in patients with poor than in those with good blood pressure control. CONCLUSIONS: The present survey indicates that the goal of antihypertensive medication is not achieved in a noticeable number of pediatric patients with treated hypertension.     

Analysis of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: the problem of 'white-coat' hypertension, responders and non-responders

OBJECTIVE: To analyse a randomized study undertaken to compare the antihypertensive efficacy of dihydropyridine calcium antagonists in patients with essential hypertension. METHOD: Blood pressure was measured both conventionally by a doctor and by non-invasive ambulatory monitoring. RESULTS: During amlodipine therapy (5 mg once a day for 4 weeks, n = 121), the mean daytime diastolic blood pressure was lowered by 8.2+/-7.1 and 0.9+/-7.4 mmHg (means +/- SD) in patients with a pretreatment daytime diastolic blood pressure >/= 90 (n = 89) and < 90 mmHg (n = 32), respectively. In 60 (67%) among the 89 patients who had an initial daytime diastolic blood pressure >/= 90 mmHg the daytime diastolic blood pressure was lowered by >/= 5 mmHg, with a mean fall of 12.0+/- 5.2 mmHg. The decrease in daytime diastolic blood pressure averaged 0.6+/- 3.5 mmHg in the remaining non-responder patients (n = 29). CONCLUSION:It seems important to evaluate the efficacy of a given antihypertensive drug by analysing patients with white-coat hypertension separately from responders to the medication. This allows one to gain maximum information concerning the effect of therapy in the individual hypertensive patients.     

Status of home blood pressure measured in morning and evening: evaluation in normotensives and hypertensives in Japanese urban population.

To assess home blood pressure status in a Japanese urban population, we analyzed home blood pressure values in normotensive subjects determined by casual blood pressure (< 140/90 mmHg), hypertensive subjects without medication (> or = 140/90 mmHg) and treated hypertensive patients. The subjects (468 male, 232 female; mean age 41 years old) were recruited from a company located in Tokyo. Home blood pressure was measured with a semi-automatic device (Omron HEM-759P). Subjects were instructed to perform triplicate morning and evening measurements on 7 consecutive days. In the treated hypertensive group (n = 70), there was a significant difference between morning (139 +/- 12/88 +/- 9 mmHg) and evening (130 +/- 12/79 +/- 8 mmHg) home blood pressure. In the normotensive group (n = 558), however, only the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) component of the home blood pressure was significantly different between morning (115 +/- 13/72 +/- 9 mmHg) and evening (114 +/- 12/68 +/- 8 mmHg). In the nontreated hypertensive group (n = 72), casual blood pressure (145 +/- 14/92 +/- 9 mmHg) was higher than morning (138 +/- 16/89 +/- 11 mmHg) and evening (134 +/- 16/83 +/- 11 mmHg) home blood pressure, but no difference was seen between morning and evening systolic blood pressure (SBP). According to the reference value of the Japanese Society of Hypertension 2004 (SBP > or = 135 mmHg and/or DBP > or = 85 mmHg), 7.2% (systolic) and 8.7% (diastolic) of subjects in the normotensive group were classified as hypertensive by home blood pressure. Casual blood pressure in the treated hypertensive group was normal in 64.3% for SBP and 70.0% for DBP. However, their morning SBP (32.9%), morning DBP (40.0%), evening SBP (10.0%), and evening DBP (17.1%) were classified as hypertensive by home blood pressure. Furthermore, patients who were taking antihypertensive drug(s) only in the morning (n = 52) showed higher morning SBP (6 mmHg, p = 0.086) and morning DBP (6 mmHg, p = 0.005) than patients taking drug(s) by other administration schedules (n = 18), but no difference in evening home blood pressure was observed. In conclusion, a proportion of the subjects defined as normotensive by casual blood pressure were classified as hypertensive by home blood pressure in the present urban population. Furthermore, morning home blood pressure control in the treated hypertensive group classified as under control by casual blood pressure was insufficient, especially in patients who were taking medication only in the morning.     

Prevalence of isolated uncontrolled systolic blood pressure among treated hypertensive patients in primary care in Belgium: results of the I-inSYST survey

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of isolated uncontrolled systolic blood pressure (on-treatment isolated systolic hypertension) in treated hypertensive patients and identify the characteristics and treatment strategy in these patients. METHODS: Prospective cross-sectional survey in primary care. Participating physicians enrolled more than 13 consecutive treated hypertensive patients. Patients were considered to have isolated systolic hypertension when systolic blood pressure was at least 140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure was less than 90 mmHg. RESULTS: On-treatment isolated systolic hypertension occurred in 28% of evaluable patients (n = 11562) and in 36% of uncontrolled patients (n = 9080). Among the isolated systolic hypertension and among other uncontrolled patients, 53% and 47%, respectively, used more than one antihypertensive drug class. beta-Blockers were the most frequently prescribed antihypertensive drugs. Patients with isolated uncontrolled systolic blood pressure were more frequently treated with diuretics (43 vs. 39%) and angiotensin II receptor antagonists (23 vs. 17%). Despite blood pressure being under control in only 21% of the patients, hypertension treatment was not changed in 46% of patients with isolated uncontrolled systolic blood presssure vs. 14% of patients with both uncontrolled systolic and diastolic blood pressure. CONCLUSION: In Belgium, the prevalence of on-treatment isolated systolic hypertension in treated hypertensive patients, was 28%. The goal blood pressure was likely not reached in most patients due to inadequate treatment. The overall control rate was worse for systolic than for diastolic blood pressure. Furthermore, antihypertensive treatment was less frequently adapted in patients with isolated uncontrolled systolic blood pressure than in those patients with both uncontrolled systolic and diastolic blood pressure.     

Blood pressure response to fish oil supplementation: metaregression analysis of randomized trials

OBJECTIVE : The antihypertensive effect of fish oil was estimated from randomized trials using metaregression analysis. Modification of the blood pressure (BP) effect by age, gender, blood pressure, and body mass index was examined. METHODS : A total of 90 randomized trials of fish oil and BP were identified through MEDLINE (1966-March 2001). Trials with co-interventions, patient populations, non-placebo controls, or duration of < 2 weeks were excluded. A total of 36 trials (50 strata) were included, 22 of which had a double-blind design. Original reports were retrieved for data collection on sample size, study design, duration, fish oil dose, BP changes and baseline characteristics of trial populations. Pooled BP estimates were obtained by metaregression analysis, weighted for trial sample sizes. Stratified analyses according to population characteristics were performed. RESULTS : Intake of fish oil was high in most trials (median dose: 3.7 g/day). Fish oil reduced systolic BP by 2.1 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0, 3.2; P < 0.01] and diastolic BP by 1.6 mmHg (95% CI: 1.0. 2.2; P < 0.01). Restricting the analysis to double-blind trials yielded BP reductions of 1.7 mmHg (95% CI: 0.3, 3.1) and 1.5 mmHg (95% CI: 0.6, 2.3), respectively. BP effects tended to be larger in populations that were older (> 45 years) and in hypertensive populations (BP >or= 140/90 mmHg). CONCLUSIONS : High intake of fish oil may lower BP, especially in older and hypertensive subjects. The antihypertensive effect of lower doses of fish oil (< 0.5 g/day) however, remains to be established.     

The effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and other commonly used non-narcotic analgesics on blood pressure level in adults

This review explores the blood pressure effects of three non-narcotic analgesics: non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), paracetamol and aspirin. The current evidence suggests that in normotensive, otherwise healthy adults, short-term use (1-2 weeks) of NSAIDs is not associated with a significant increase in blood pressure. Those with existing hypertension are more likely to see a blood pressure elevation, although the magnitude of the effect is less predictable and may vary with age, baseline blood pressure, type of NSAID and concurrent antihypertensive therapy. The magnitude of the blood pressure increase appears to be similar for both NSAIDs and paracetamol, while low-dose aspirin may have more modest effects. In hypertensive adults who experience deterioration of blood pressure control on NSAIDs, there is some, albeit suboptimal, evidence that the blood pressure-raising effects of NSAIDs are less when used in conjunction with dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers than angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.