Economic efficiency and fairness: two ethical criteria? A basic reflection

Many statements on the allocation of health care resources show an appreciation of the two criteria "efficiency" and "fairness" as two values which are to be weighed against each other in case of conflict. This article provides a critique of this model, which is conceived to rest on a hybrid (partly utilitarian, partly counter-utilitarian) basis. The most important fairness-related argument, or so it is argued, is of a sort which is incompatible with the reasons utilitarianism (or, indeed, consequentialism) provides as a basis for the efficiency criterion. If the argument is right, we have to provide another basis, at least as far as moral inhibitions are strong about taking efficiency into account. The present article does not go into detail about such an alternative. It relates to the on-going discussion on John Taurek's (1977) article about "numbers", especially on the so-called aggregation argument against Taurek's "no-worse-claim", and argues against the majority of commentators, consequentialist and deontological alike, that Taurek was right.     

Variations in 'avoidable' mortality: a reflection of variations in incidence?

BACKGROUND: Variations in 'avoidable' mortality may reflect variations in the quality of care, but they may also be due to variations in incidence or severity of diseases. We studied the association between regional variations in 'avoidable' mortality and variations in disease incidence. For a selection of conditions we also analysed whether the proportion of in-hospital deaths can explain the regional variations in incidence-adjusted mortality. METHODS: Relative risks for mortality, incidence, incidence-adjusted mortality and in-hospital mortality (1984-1994) were calculated by log-linear regression. Linear regression was used to examine the relationship between mortality and incidence on the one hand, and between incidence-adjusted mortality and in-hospital mortality on the other. RESULTS: Significant regional mortality variations were found for cervical cancer, cancer of the testis, hypertensive and cerebrovascular disease, influenza/pneumonia, cholecystitis/lithiasis, perinatal causes and congenital cardiovascular anomalies. Regional mortality differences in general were only partly accounted for by incidence variations. The only exception was cervical cancer, which no longer showed significant variations after adjustment for incidence. The contribution of inhospital mortality variations to total cause-specific mortality variations varied between conditions: the highest percentage of explained variance was found for mortality from CVA (60.1%) and appendicitis (29.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Incidence data are a worthy addition to studies on 'avoidable' mortality. It is to be expected that the incidence-adjusted mortality rates are more sensitive for quality-of-care variations than the 'crude' mortality variations. Nevertheless, further research at the individual level is needed to identify possible deficiencies in health care delivery.     

Occupational therapists’ reflection on practice within psychiatric care: A Delphi study

Aim: The aim of this study was to describe the reflections on practice in a group of Swedish occupational therapists in psychiatric care in order to illuminate the present practice and ideas about the future using a Delphi survey of three rounds. Material and method: The sample consisted of 14 occupational therapists in psychiatric care. The answers from the first and second rounds illustrate the wide variation in their practice. The third round points out consensus and disagreements in the domains: professional role, theories in practice, domain of concern, occupational therapy assessment, goal setting/treatment, outcome/evaluation and thoughts about the future. A consensus was reached in all domains, but not regarding competence to treat functional reduction and symptoms, or on the importance of theories for documentation, the choice of a theoretical foundation, and the importance of an evidence-based treatment model, although the theories were seen as supporting practice. Disagreements were found as to the effectiveness of repeated assessments as a means of evaluation. The future for OTs within psychiatric care was looked upon as positive. Discussion: The results developed from providing a relatively unclear and shallow perspective on OT practice to indicating a depth that shows what occupational therapy within psychiatry can be. During the process it became more and more clear how OTs think and act.     

Complaints against nurses: a reflection of 'the new managerialism' and consumerism in health care?

This paper discusses the effects of restructuring on nursing as a profession through an examination of the issue of complaints in Ontario. It argues that new managerialist techniques and associated changes in the nature of work are reducing the autonomy of nurses and making it difficult for them to meet the standards of their profession. Simultaneously, the Ontario government has increased the power of the public in the disciplinary process and the College of Nurses of Ontario is encouraging patients to register their complaints. The growth of consumerism in health care, coupled with the disciplinary process, individualizes complaints and deemphasizes their relationship to restructuring. Moreover, in response to the increasing number of complaints - complaints which more often come from the public - nursing organizations have encouraged the legalization of the disciplinary process, thus fostering the individualization of the issues.     

A study of critical reflection in health professional education: ‘learning where others are coming from’

A dominant focus of clinical education for health professional students is experiential learning through an apprentice model where students are exposed to a range of clinical scenarios and conditions through observation initially, and then through supervised clinical practice. However experiential learning may not be enough to meet the need for health professionals to be flexible, self-aware and understanding of alternative perspectives or ‘where other people are coming from.’ Critical reflection skills are recognised as a way of thinking and a process for analysing practice, that enables learning from, and redeveloping professional practice in an ongoing way. This paper describes and examines the effect of a three hour per week, six week critical reflection program, grounded in knowledge paradigms of postmodernism, reflexivity and critical theory, on third year undergraduate physiotherapy students’ experience of their first clinical placements. The theoretical basis of the program provides a potential bridge with which to link and broaden the established framework of clinical reasoning theories. Within the program, students’ critical reflection discourse focused on notions of power, hierarchies, connecting with others and relationships. Their feedback about the effects of the program highlighted themes of validation and sharing; a break in clinical performance and a broadening of their spheres of knowledge. These themes resonated with students’ overall experiences of learning in clinical placements and provide some evidence for the inclusion of critical reflection as a valid and worthwhile component of early clinical education.     

Chatbot breakthrough in the 2020s? An ethical reflection on the trend of automated consultations in health care

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy - Many experts have emphasised that chatbots are not sufficiently mature to be able to technically diagnose patient conditions or replace the judgements of...     

Low uptake of prenatal screening for Down syndrome in minority ethnic groups and socially deprived groups: a reflection of women's attitudes or a failure to facilitate informed choices?

BACKGROUND: It is not known if lower uptake of prenatal screening for Down syndrome in women from minority ethnic groups and socioeconomically disadvantaged women reflects more negative attitudes towards undergoing the test or women not acting in line with their attitudes i.e. not making an informed choice. METHODS: Uptake of prenatal screening, attitudes towards undergoing the test, uptake-attitude consistency, and informed choice were assessed in a prospective study of 1499 pregnant women attending two UK hospitals. RESULTS: Uptake was higher in white and socioeconomically advantaged women than in other women. There were no differences in attitudes towards undergoing the test; all women expressed relatively positive attitudes. Uptake-attitude consistency was higher in white and socioeconomically advantaged women than others, particularly in those with positive attitudes towards undergoing the test (76% white women with positive attitudes had the test compared with 45% South Asian women [difference 31%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 18-43] and 78% socioeconomically advantaged women compared with 63% more disadvantaged women (difference 15%, 95% CI 7-24)). Controlling for demographic variables, South Asian and socioeconomically disadvantaged women with positive attitudes were less likely to make an informed choice than other women [odds ratio (OR) 0.22, 95% CI 0.10-0.45 and OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.93, respectively]. CONCLUSION: Lower uptake of screening for Down syndrome in women from minority ethnic groups and socioeconomically disadvantaged women does not reflect more negative attitudes towards screening but rather lower rates of informed choice, as assessed in this study. Healthcare systems appear to facilitate informed choices in the context of prenatal screening for Down syndrome screening less well for women from minority ethnic groups and those who are socioeconomically disadvantaged than for other women.