Omalizumab is effective in the long-term control of severe allergic asthma.

BACKGROUND: Previous reports show that addition of omalizumab to standard therapy reduces asthma exacerbations and simultaneously decreases use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and rescue medication in patients with allergic asthma. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of omalizumab on long-term disease control in patients with severe allergic asthma. METHODS: The present study concerns the 24-week, double-blind extension phase to a previous 28-week core study in which patients received subcutaneous omalizumab or matching placebo (at least 0.016 mg/kg/IgE [IU/mL] every 4 weeks) for 16 weeks in addition to their existing ICS therapy (beclomethasone dipropionate [BDP]; steroid-stable phase), followed by a 12-week phase in which controlled attempts were made to gradually reduce ICS therapy (steroid-reduction phase). During the extension phase patients were maintained on randomized treatment (omalizumab or placebo) and the lowest sustainable dose of BDP. The use of other asthma medications was permitted during the extension phase. Investigators were also allowed to switch patients from BDP to other ICS medications if considered necessary. RESULTS: A total of 460 patients (omalizumab, n = 245; placebo, n = 215) entered the extension phase. Overall, omalizumab-treated patients experienced significantly fewer exacerbations vs placebo during the extension phase (0.60 and 0.83 exacerbations per patient, respectively; P = 0.023), despite a sustained significant reduction in their use of ICS (mean BDP equivalent dose: omalizumab, 227 microg/d; placebo, 335 microg/d; P < 0.001). Treatment with omalizumab was well tolerated and the incidence of adverse events was similar in both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that omalizumab is effective in the long-term control of severe allergic asthma.     

Omalizumab, anti-IgE recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of severe allergic asthma

BACKGROUND: A recombinant humanized anti-IgE mAb, omalizumab, forms complexes with free IgE, blocking its interaction with mast cells and basophils; as a consequence, it might be effective in the treatment of asthma. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of omalizumab in the treatment of inhaled corticosteroid-dependent asthma. METHODS: In this phase III, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, 525 subjects with severe allergic asthma requiring daily inhaled corticosteroids were randomized to receive placebo or omalizumab subcutaneously every 2 or 4 weeks, depending on baseline IgE level and body weight. Inhaled corticosteroid doses were kept stable over the initial 16 weeks of treatment and tapered during a further 12-week treatment period. RESULTS: Omalizumab treatment resulted in significantly fewer asthma exacerbations per subject and in lower percentages of subjects experiencing an exacerbation than placebo treatment during the stable steroid phase (0.28 vs 0.54 [P =.006] and 14.6% vs 23.3% [P =.009], respectively) and during the steroid reduction phase (0.39 vs 0.66 [P =.003] and 21.3% vs 32.3% [P =.004], respectively). Beclomethasone dipropionate reduction was significantly greater with omalizumab treatment than with placebo (median 75% vs 50% [P <.001]), and beclomethasone dipropionate discontinuation was more likely with omalizumab (39.6% vs 19.1% [P <.001]). Improvements in asthma symptoms and pulmonary function occurred along with a reduction in rescue beta-agonist use. Omalizumab was well tolerated, with an adverse-events profile similar to that of placebo. CONCLUSION: The addition of omalizumab to standard asthma therapy reduces asthma exacerbations and decreases inhaled corticosteroid and rescue medication use.     

Leukotriene receptor antagonist, montelukast, can reduce the need for inhaled steroid while maintaining the clinical stability of asthmatic patients

BACKGROUND: Oral leukotriene receptor antagonists have been shown to have efficacy in chronic asthma. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the addition of montelukast could lead to a reduction in inhaled corticosteroid dose without a significant decrease in peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR). METHODS: After a 4-week run-in period, 191 moderate-to-severe asthmatic patients whose asthma had been well controlled with daily inhaled corticosteroid therapy (beclometasone dipropionate 800 to 1600 micro g/day), were randomly assigned to one of two treatments - placebo (n = 98) or montelukast 10 mg once daily (n = 93) - for a 24-week, multicentre, double-blind, treatment period. At the beginning of the active treatment period, the daily dose of inhaled corticosteroid was halved in all of the patients. In addition, the inhaled corticosteroid dose was subsequently titrated every 8 weeks, based on PEFR, asthma symptoms and beta-agonist use. RESULTS: After 8 weeks of a 50% reduction in inhaled corticosteroid use, morning PEFR increased by 5.3 +/- 32.3 L/min from baseline in patients receiving montelukast and significantly decreased by 6.9 +/- 29.0 L/min in those receiving placebo (P = 0.035). In addition, evening PEFR significantly decreased by 9.8 +/- 28.5 L/min (P = 0.003) in the placebo group, but was maintained in the montelukast group. In spite of a subsequent 50% reduction in the inhaled corticosteroid dose every 8 weeks, morning and evening PEFRs were maintained over the 24-week treatment period in the montelukast group; PEFR significantly decreased in the placebo group. There was a significant difference between the two groups with regard to morning PEFR, therapy score and asthmatic score at weeks 8, 16 and 24, as well as evening PEFR at week 8. However, the symptom scores were not significantly different between the two groups or within each group. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that montelukast reduces the need for inhaled corticosteroids while maintaining asthma control over a 24-week period. Therefore, montelukast may be useful for long-term treatment in patients with asthma who require high doses of inhaled corticosteroids.     

Efficacy and safety of dry powder fluticasone propionate in children with persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: Flovent Diskus is a powder formulation of the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone propionate (FP) delivered via a breath-actuated, multidose inhaler. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of dry powder FP administered once or twice daily (200 microg per day) to children with persistent asthma. METHODS: Twelve-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial with a 52-week, open-label extension. Children aged 4 to 11 were required to have pulmonary function 50% to 85% of predicted values. The population was stratified for baseline therapy (inhaled corticosteroid/cromolyn or bronchodilators only). After a 2-week placebo run-in, 242 patients received dry powder FP 200 microg each morning, dry powder FP 100 microg BID, or placebo for 12 weeks; 192 were rerandomized to the QD or BID regimen for an additional 52 weeks of open-label treatment. Primary endpoints were mean changes in FEV1 and morning PEF recorded at clinic visits. RESULTS: Both dry powder FP regimens significantly improved FEV1, evening PEF, and asthma symptoms at the double-blind phase endpoint (P < or = .017 compared with placebo). The BID regimen also significantly improved morning PEF and nighttime awakenings due to asthma (P < or = .005). Among patients previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids/cromolyn, improvements observed with the QD and BID regimens were similar. Patients switched from BID to open-label QD treatment showed additional improvements at week 52 generally comparable to patients who received the BID regimen during both phases. Fluticasone propionate was well tolerated for up to 64 weeks with few reports of drug-related adverse events or morning plasma cortisol abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Once daily dosing of dry powder FP 200 microg is an effective and convenient alternative for children whose asthma is controlled with a more frequent dosing regimen of inhaled corticosteroids.     

Omalizumab improves asthma-related quality of life in patients with severe allergic asthma

BACKGROUND: We have previously shown that omalizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, reduces asthma exacerbations and decreases inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) requirement in patients with severe allergic asthma who were symptomatic despite moderate-to-high doses of ICSs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess the effects of omalizumab on asthma-related quality of life (QOL). METHODS: These analyses were part of a multicenter, 52-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of subcutaneous omalizumab (> or =0.016 mg/kg of IgE [in international unit per milliliter] per 4 weeks) in 525 adults with severe allergic asthma. A 16-week steroid-stable phase was followed by a 12-week steroid-reduction phase and a 24-week double-blind extension phase. The effect of treatment on asthma-related QOL was evaluated by using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) administered at baseline and at weeks 16, 28, and 52. RESULTS: The 2 treatment groups were comparable in terms of baseline AQLQ scores. At weeks 16, 28, and 52, omalizumab-treated patients demonstrated statistically significant improvements across all AQLQ domains, as well as in overall score. Moreover, a greater proportion of patients receiving omalizumab achieved a clinically meaningful improvement in asthma-related QOL during each phase of the study. Greater than 50% of both patients and investigators rated treatment similarly with omalizumab as excellent or good compared with less than 40% of placebo recipients. CONCLUSION: In patients requiring moderate-to-high doses of ICSs for severe allergic asthma, the measurably improved disease control afforded by add-on omalizumab therapy is paralleled by clinically meaningful improvements in asthma-related QOL.     

Steroid-sparing effect of subcutaneous SQ-standardised specific immunotherapy in moderate and severe house dust mite allergic asthmatics

BACKGROUND: The present study evaluated the steroid-sparing effect of subcutaneous SQ-standardized specific immunotherapy (SIT) in moderate and severe house dust mite (HDM) allergic asthmatics. METHODS: Fifty-four adult asthmatics allergic to HDM requiring at least inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) doses equivalent to 500 microg fluticasone propionate daily were randomized to subcutaneous SIT or placebo injections for a period of 3 years. The minimum required ICS dose, 4 week diary of asthma symptom score, use of rescue medication, peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements and visual analog scale for asthma symptoms were assessed before start of treatment and after 1, 2 and 3 years of treatment. RESULTS: In patients with moderate and severe asthma, the reduction in ICS was statistical significant after 2 years of treatment (P = 0.03) but not after 3 years. The median reductions were 82% and 42% after the third year for active and placebo respectively. In patients with moderate persistent asthma the reduction was statistical significant larger for those treated with SIT compared with placebo after year 2 and year 3. The median reductions after 3 years were 90% for SIT and 42% for placebo (P = 0.04). Despite significant steroid reduction, there was no difference in asthma assessments between the two groups. No serious reactions related to SIT injections were seen. CONCLUSION: This study shows that SIT with a SQ-standardized HDM extract is safe. An ICS sparing effect was evident in patients with moderate persistent asthma.     

Evaluation of long-term safety of the anti-IgE antibody, omalizumab, in children with allergic asthma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term effects of the anti-IgE antibody omalizumab in children with asthma. METHODS: This was a 28-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial with a 24-week open-label extension. In the core trial 225 children (ages 6 to 12 years) with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma requiring inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) received omalizumab every 2 or 4 weeks, and 109 received placebo. BDP dosage was stable for weeks 1 to 16, then reduced during weeks 17 to 24 using strict safety criteria. The lowest dose for optimal asthma control was maintained for 4 more weeks. During the 24-week extension, all patients (n = 309) received open-label omalizumab in addition to other asthma medications. One-year safety data were analyzed. RESULTS: The incidence of adverse events in patients treated with omalizumab for 52 weeks was similar to those treated for 28 weeks in the core trial, which was generally comparable with placebo. In the 52-week omalizumab group, upper respiratory tract infection and headache were the most frequently reported adverse events (47.1% and 42.7%, respectively). Eleven patients (4.9%) reported urticaria, which resolved spontaneously or with antihistamine, except for 1 patient who was discontinued because of severe urticaria. No anaphylactic reactions or adverse events suggestive of serum sickness or immune complex formation occurred. No anti-omalizumab antibodies were detected in any of the children. There is no evidence that new or more serious adverse events occur with long-term omalizumab treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with omalizumab is safe and well tolerated in children with allergic asthma.     

Inhaled salmeterol and fluticasone: a study comparing monotherapy and combination therapy in asthma.

BACKGROUND: The current stepwise approach to pharmacotherapy in the treatment of asthma includes the initiation of an inhaled corticosteroid with the addition of a long-acting inhaled bronchodilator if low dose inhaled corticosteroid fails to control asthma symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether initiation of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate treatment together improves asthma control greater than initiation of monotherapy with the individual agents alone with no additional safety risk in patients with asthma who had not previously been treated with inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: A total of 136 male and female patients at least 12 years of age with asthma [forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV) between 50% and 80% of predicted] were randomized to twice daily salmeterol 42 microg, fluticasone propionate 88 microg, fluticasone propionate 220 microg, salmeterol 42 microg plus fluticasone propionate 88 microg, salmeterol 42 microg plus fluticasone propionate 220 microg, or placebo for 4 weeks. RESULTS: Patients treated with salmeterol combined with fluticasone propionate had improvements over baseline in FEV at endpoint that were at least twice as great (0.6 to 0.7 L) as improvements in patients treated with salmeterol (0.3 L) or fluticasone propionate alone (0.3 L) (P < .05). Patient-rated data (peak expiratory flow, asthma symptom scores, percent of days with no asthma symptoms) confirmed greater (P < .05) mean change from baseline improvements after combined treatment compared with fluticasone propionate alone. No clinically significant differences were noted between treatment groups in any safety measurement. CONCLUSION: Initiation of maintenance therapy with salmeterol and fluticasone propionate in patients with asthma treated with short-acting beta2-agonists alone provides greater improvements in pulmonary function and symptom control than initiation of maintenance therapy with fluticasone propionate alone.     

Efficacy and tolerability of anti-immunoglobulin E therapy with omalizumab in patients with poorly controlled (moderate-to-severe) allergic asthma

BACKGROUND: Patients with poorly controlled asthma have greater morbidity and mortality. This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of omalizumab in patients with poorly controlled, moderate-to-severe allergic asthma. METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, multicentre, parallel-group study. A total of 312 patients (12-73 years) receiving >/=400 microg/day (adolescent) or >/=800 microg/day (adult) inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate, or equivalent were included. Patients received best standard care (BSC) with or without omalizumab [at least 0.016 mg/kg/IgE (IU/ml) every 4 weeks] for 12 months. RESULTS: The annualized mean number of asthma deterioration-related incidents was reduced from 9.76 with BSC alone (n = 106) to 4.92 per patient-year with omalizumab (n = 206) (P < 0.001). Mean clinically significant asthma exacerbation rates were 2.86 and 1.12 per patient-year, respectively (P < 0.001). Omalizumab-treated patients (41.4%) required rescue medication <1 day/week compared with 20.7% for BSC alone (P < 0.001). Omalizumab improved absolute forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) compared with BSC alone (2.48 and 2.28 l, respectively; P < 0.05) and reduced symptom scores relative to BSC alone (decrease of 6.5 and 0.7 respectively; P < 0.001). Omalizumab was well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Omalizumab administered as add-on therapy to BSC benefits patients with poorly controlled, moderate-to-severe allergic asthma.     

Adherence with montelukast or fluticasone in a long-term clinical trial: results from the mild asthma montelukast versus inhaled corticosteroid trial

BACKGROUND: Nonadherence with asthma therapy is common and may contribute to poor clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of dosing frequency and mode of delivery of therapy on adherence and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We examined adherence in patients with mild persistent asthma (15-85 years) enrolled in a randomized study of montelukast (10 mg once daily) or fluticasone (88 microg, 2 puffs twice daily) during a 12-week double-blind treatment period (DB), followed by a 36-week open-label trial (OL). Adherence was monitored using eDEM for montelukast/placebo and MDILog devices for fluticasone/placebo. RESULTS: Participants used at least 1 puff of inhaled therapy on 83.3% DB/76.8% OL of days and at least 1 dose of oral therapy on 77.5%/71.4% of days (P < .0001). Subjects used inhaled therapy less than prescribed on 49.5%/57.5% of days, compared with 22.5%/28.6% of days for oral therapy (P < .0001). In the DB, a dose-response relationship was observed with fluticasone and asthma rescue-free days (P = .02) and FEV(1) percent predicted (P < .01) only for patients with FEV(1) < or = 86%. In the OL period, a dose-response relationship was observed with fluticasone and FEV(1) percent predicted (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Whereas subjects were more likely to use inhaled fluticasone/placebo at least once a day, subjects were more likely to take once-daily oral montelukast/placebo as prescribed. Clinical outcomes were inconsistently associated with adherence levels. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Patients were less likely to be fully adherent with twice-daily therapy than with once-daily therapy, but most still achieved adequate asthma control.     

Spotlight on Omalizumab in Allergic Asthma

Omalizumab (Xolair) is a humanized monoclonal antibody used in the treatment of adolescent and adult patients with moderate to severe allergic asthma inadequately controlled with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). It selectively binds to circulating immunoglobulin E (IgE) and, thereby, prevents binding of IgE to mast cells and other effector cells. Without surface-bound IgE, these cells are unable to recognize allergens, thus preventing cellular activation by antigens and the subsequent allergic/asthmatic symptoms. Omalizumab decreases free serum IgE levels in a dose-dependent manner, reduces IgE receptor density on effector cells, and significantly improves airway inflammation parameters.Omalizumab is slowly absorbed after subcutaneous administration, and mean elimination half-life is 26 days, thus allowing infrequent administration of the drug. Omalizumab dosage is determined by bodyweight and pretreatment serum total IgE levels. Patients treated with subcutaneous omalizumab in clinical trials received a dosage that was approximately equal to 0.016 mg/kg/IgE (IU/mL) per 4 weeks. Thus, patients received 150 or 300 mg every 4 weeks, or 225, 300, or 375 mg every 2 weeks.In adults and adolescents (> or = 12 years of age) with moderate to severe allergic asthma, subcutaneous administration of omalizumab as add-on therapy with ICS improved the number of asthma exacerbations, rescue medication use, asthma symptom scores, and quality-of-life (QOL) scores compared with placebo during 28- and 32-week double-blind trials. In addition, concomitant ICS use was significantly decreased in patients receiving omalizumab, and in the two largest double-blind trials approximately 40% of omalizumab recipients completely withdrew from ICS therapy while maintaining effective asthma control. In general, results of extension studies showed that the beneficial effects of omalizumab were maintained over a total period of 52 weeks. Omalizumab was well tolerated as add-on therapy with ICS during treatment for up to 52 weeks. Common adverse events in clinical trials included injection site reaction, viral infection, upper respiratory tract infection, sinusitis, headache, and pharyngitis, although the incidence of adverse events with omalizumab was similar to that with placebo.In conclusion, omalizumab, as add-on therapy with ICS, is an effective and well tolerated agent for the treatment of moderate to severe allergic asthma in adolescents and adults. In addition to its symptomatic and QOL benefits, omalizumab therapy allows ICS dosage reduction or discontinuation of ICS in many patients. Comparisons of omalizumab with other asthma therapies have yet to be conducted; however, clinical efficacy and tolerability data indicate that omalizumab is a valuable option in the treatment of allergic asthma.     

Beclomethasone/formoterol vs fluticasone/salmeterol inhaled combination in moderate to severe asthma

BACKGROUND: Recommended treatment for moderate to severe asthma is the combination of an inhaled corticosteroid and a long-acting beta(2)-agonist. The present study was designed to compare a new fixed combination of extrafine beclomethasone and formoterol, with the fixed combination fluticasone and salmeterol. METHODS: This was a phase III, multinational, multicentre, double-blind, randomized, two-arm parallel groups, controlled study. After a 2-week run-in period, 228 patients with moderate to severe asthma were randomized to a 12-week treatment with either beclomethasone 100 microg plus formoterol 6 microg or fluticasone 125 microg plus salmeterol 25 microg, both delivered two inhalations b.i.d. via a pressurized metered dose inhaler. RESULTS: The analysis of noninferiority on the primary outcome, morning peak expiratory flow in the last 2 weeks of treatment, showed no difference between groups (difference -3.32 l/min; 95% CI -17.92 to 11.28). A significant improvement from baseline in lung function, symptom score and rescue medication use was observed in both groups at all time points. Beclomethasone plus formoterol combination showed a significantly faster onset of bronchodilation when compared with fluticasone plus salmeterol with the difference maintained for up to 1 h postdosing. No differences were observed between treatments in the rate of asthma exacerbations, frequency of adverse events and overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine ratio. CONCLUSIONS: The new combination of extrafine beclomethasone plus formoterol is not inferior to the marketed combination of fluticasone and salmeterol in terms of efficacy and tolerability, with the advantage of a faster onset of bronchodilation. ( ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00394368).     

Efficacy and tolerability of anti-immunoglobulin E therapy with omalizumab in patients with concomitant allergic asthma and persistent allergic rhinitis: SOLAR

BACKGROUND: Anti-IgE therapy could be particularly beneficial for patients with concomitant disease as it targets a common factor in both diseases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of omalizumab in patients with concomitant moderate-to-severe asthma and persistent allergic rhinitis. METHODS: This multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of omalizumab. A total of 405 patients (12-74 years) with a stable treatment (>/= 400 microg budesonide Turbuhaler) and >/= 2 unscheduled medical visits for asthma during the past year or >/= 3 during the past 2 years were enrolled. Patients received omalizumab (>/= 0.016 mg/kg/IgE [IU/ml] per 4 weeks) or placebo for 28 weeks. RESULTS: Fewer patients treated with omalizumab experienced asthma exacerbations (20.6%) than placebo-treated patients (30.1%), P = 0.02. A clinically significant (>/= 1.0 point) improvement in both Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire and Rhinitis Quality of Life Questionnaire occurred in 57.7% of omalizumab patients compared with 40.6% of placebo patients (P < 0.001). Omalizumab reduced Wasserfallen symptom scores for asthma (P = 0.023), rhinitis (P < 0.001) and the composite asthma/rhinitis scores (P < 0.001) compared with placebo. Serious adverse events were observed in 1.4% of omalizumab-treated patients and 1.5% of placebo-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Omalizumab is well tolerated and effective in preventing asthma exacerbations and improving quality of life in patients with concomitant asthma and persistent allergic rhinitis.     

Combination of omalizumab and specific immunotherapy is superior to immunotherapy in patients with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and co-morbid seasonal allergic asthma

Background The treatment of allergic asthma by specific immunotherapy (SIT) is hampered by potential side-effects.
Objective The aim of this study was to study the effect of omalizumab, a monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, in combination with SIT in patients with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (SAR) and co-morbid seasonal allergic asthma (SAA) incompletely controlled by conventional pharmacotherapy.
Methods A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre trial was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of omalizumab (Xolair^®) vs. placebo in combination with depigmented SIT (Depigoid^®) during the grass pollen season. Omalizumab or placebo was started 2 weeks before SIT; the whole treatment lasted 18 weeks. Primary endpoint was daily 'symptom load', the sum of daily scores for symptom severity and rescue medication use.
Results A total of 140 patients (age 11–46 years) were randomized; and a total of 130 finished the study. Combination therapy reduced the symptom load by 39% ( P =0.0464, Wilcoxon test) over SIT monotherapy. This difference was mainly due to reduced symptom severity ( P =0.0044), while rescue medication use did not change significantly. Combination therapy also improved asthma control (Asthma Control Questionnaire, P =0.0295) and quality of life in the case of asthma (Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, P =0.0293) and rhinoconjunctivitis (Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire, P =0.0537). Numbers of patients with 'excellent or good' treatment efficacy according to ratings of investigators (75.0% vs. 36.9%) or patients (78.5% vs. 46.1%) were markedly higher in the combination group than under SIT alone.
Conclusion Combination of omalizumab with SIT for treatment of patients with SAR and co-morbid SAA was safe and reduced the symptom load in a statistically significant and clinically meaningful manner.     

Suppression of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity with inhaled flunisolide and fluticasone propionate in adult asthma patients.

BACKGROUND: Suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, a potential systemic effect of inhaled corticosteroid therapy, can be quantified by monitoring serum, urinary, and salivary cortisol levels. OBJECTIVES: 1) Compare the effects on HPA axis of the inhaled corticosteroids flunisolide and fluticasone propionate versus placebo and oral prednisone. 2) Estimate dose-potency ratio for HPA-axis suppression. METHODS: Multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, open-label, 21-day trial. Active regimens were flunisolide 500 and 1,000 microg, twice daily; fluticasone propionate 110, 220, 330, and 440 microg, twice daily; and prednisone, 7.5 mg daily. Enrolled patients were nonsmokers, 18 to 50 years of age, with persistent mild-to-moderate asthma and had not used oral, nasal, or inhaled corticosteroids for 6 months before study. Main outcome measures were area under serum cortisol concentration curve for 22 hours (AUC(0-22h)); 24-hour urinary cortisol level; and 8 AM salivary cortisol level. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three patients were randomly assigned to active treatment or placebo; 125 patients completed the study and were at least 80% compliant with their regimens. Both fluticasone propionate and flunisolide caused dose-dependent suppression of HPA axis, which was statistically greater for fluticasone propionate (P = 0.0003). Dose-potency ratio showed 4.4 times more serum-cortisol suppression/microgram increase in dose with fluticasone propionate than with flunisolide. Diurnal pattern of serum cortisol suppression was persistent with fluticasone propionate and "remitting" with flunisolide. Salivary and urinary cortisol data were qualitatively similar to serum cortisol results. CONCLUSIONS: Fluticasone caused significantly more suppression of HPA axis than flunisolide. Flunisolide may provide a safe option for patients with asthma requiring long-term inhaled corticosteroid therapy.     

Fluticasone propionate and salmeterol administered via Diskus compared with salmeterol or fluticasone propionate alone in patients suboptimally controlled with short-acting beta2-agonists.

BACKGROUND: Optimal therapy for many patients with persistent asthma requires control of both main components of this disease: inflammation and bronchoconstriction. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of initiating maintenance therapy with an inhaled, long-acting beta2-agonist and an inhaled corticosteroid administered from a single device with that of the individual agents alone. METHODS: A 12-week, randomized, double-blind study was conducted in patients 12 years and older with persistent asthma who were symptomatic while taking as-needed, short-acting beta2-agonists alone. Treatments were administered twice daily via the Diskus device: salmeterol, 50 microg; fluticasone propionate, 100 microg; or fluticasone propionate, 100 microg, with salmeterol, 50 microg. RESULTS: Of 555 patients screened, 267 were randomly assigned to treatment. At end point, fluticasone propionate and salmeterol significantly increased predose forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) compared with salmeterol alone (0.51 +/- 0.05 L vs 0.38 +/- 0.04 L, P = .04). Fluticasone propionate and salmeterol significantly increased area under the serial FEV1 curve at treatment week 12 relative to predose FEV1 (baseline) on treatment day 1 (AUCb1, 8.4 +/- 0.6 L/h; P < or = .02) compared with salmeterol (6.2 +/- 0.5 L/h) and fluticasone propionate (7.0 +/- 0.6 L/h). Fluticasone propionate and salmeterol were significantly (P < or = .02) more effective than the individual agents used alone in improving morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate and asthma symptoms. In addition, fluticasone propionate and salmeterol effectively reduced rescue albuterol use (P < or = .04). All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: In patients symptomatic while taking short-acting beta2-agonists alone, initial maintenance treatment of the 2 main components of asthma, inflammation and smooth muscle dysfunction, with fluticasone propionate and salmeterol, 100 and 50 microg, administered via the Diskus results in greater improvements in overall asthma control compared with treatment of either component alone.     

Omalizumab

Omalizumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets circulating IgE, is approved as add-on therapy for adult and adolescent patients with severe allergic asthma in the EU and moderate to severe allergic asthma in the US. Several randomized, double-blind trials have demonstrated the therapeutic efficacy of subcutaneously administered omalizumab as add-on therapy in patients with allergic asthma. The INNOVATE study included only patients with severe persistent disease, and omalizumab was associated with a statistically significant relative reduction of 26% in the rate of clinically significant asthma exacerbations (primary endpoint) compared with placebo (after adjustment for an imbalance in the exacerbation history at baseline). Results for a number of secondary outcomes also significantly favored omalizumab over placebo. Two large studies in patients with moderate to severe allergic asthma showed that, compared with placebo, omalizumab was associated with statistically significant relative reductions of 41-58% in the mean number of asthma exacerbations (primary endpoint) during the trial. Omalizumab also significantly reduced asthma symptom scores and the use of inhaled corticosteroids and rescue medication. Moreover, all of these trials showed that omalizumab was associated with clinically and statistically significant improvements from baseline in overall asthma-related quality of life.In general, omalizumab was well tolerated in clinical trials. Most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity and occurred at a similar frequency among omalizumab and placebo recipients. Injection-site reactions were the most commonly reported adverse events in clinical trials with omalizumab. Although rare, anaphylactic reactions have occurred following administration of omalizumab, and appropriate precautions should be taken.Results of several large randomized trials, therefore, have established omalizumab as an effective and well tolerated agent for use as add-on therapy in patients with severe persistent allergic asthma (EU labeling) or those with moderate to severe disease (US labeling). In addition, international treatment guidelines acknowledge the importance of omalizumab as a treatment option in these difficult-to-treat patient populations.     

Efficacy and safety of inhaled fluticasone propionate chlorofluorocarbon in 2- to 4-year-old patients with asthma: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Current asthma guidelines recommend inhaled glucocorticoids administered via pressurized metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with a holding chamber as the preferred therapy for young children with asthma. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate chlorofluorocarbon MDI use in preschool-aged children with asthma. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of 332 children aged 24 to 47 months with asthma. Fluticasone propionate chlorofluorocarbon, 44 or 88 microg twice daily, or placebo (chlorofluorocarbon propellant alone) administered for 12 weeks via MDI with a valved holding chamber and an attached face mask. The primary efficacy measure was average change in 24-hour daily asthma symptom scores. Safety assessments included adverse events, 12-hour urinary cortisol excretion, and growth. RESULTS: Treatment failure (ie, asthma exacerbation) occurred in approximately half as many fluticasone propionate-treated patients (13%-14%) as placebo-treated patients (24%). Compared with placebo users, patients treated with fluticasone propionate, 88 microg twice daily, had a 13% greater improvement in the mean proportion of symptom- and albuterol-free days (P = .02); asthma symptom scores and albuterol use were also significantly reduced. Patients treated with fluticasone propionate, 44 microg twice daily, had greater improvements than placebo-treated patients; however, differences did not reach statistical significance. At end point, the growth velocities of fluticasone propionate-treated patients were within the range of those of placebo-treated patients. No clinically relevant changes in 12-hour overnight urinary cortisol excretion were observed. CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo use, fluticasone propionate, 88 microg administered twice daily, significantly reduced asthma exacerbations, asthma symptoms, and rescue albuterol use and was well tolerated, with no clinically relevant systemic effects, as measured by growth velocity or 12-hour urinary cortisol excretion levels.     

Asthma control can be maintained when fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in a single inhaler is stepped down

BACKGROUND: Asthma control is the goal of treatment, but little data exist to support treatment strategies for stepping down treatment once control has been achieved. OBJECTIVE: We assessed whether either the long-acting beta2-agonist or corticosteroid could be reduced without loss of asthma control once control had been attained with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FSC). METHODS: After 12 weeks of open-label treatment with FSC 250/50 microg twice daily, patients whose asthma was well controlled were randomized to FSC 100/50 microg twice daily or fluticasone propionate (FP) 250 microg twice daily. for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was mean morning peak expiratory flow over the randomized study period. Secondary endpoints included symptom scores, rescue albuterol use, and asthma control. RESULTS: During open-label treatment, improvements from baseline were seen, and 435 of 641 patients (68%) achieved well controlled status during each of the last 4 weeks of this period. A total of 246 patients received FSC 100/50 microg twice daily and 238 FP 250 microg twice daily. The adjusted mean change in morning peak expiratory flow from the end of open-label treatment was -0.3 L/min for FSC and -13.2 L/min for FP (treatment difference, 12.9 L/min; 95% CI, 8.1-17.6; P<.001). Secondary efficacy endpoints also showed FSC 100/50 microg twice daily to be more effective than FP 250 microg twice daily alone. The majority of patients remained well controlled, but the proportion was higher with FSC. CONCLUSION: In patients achieving asthma control with FSC 250/50 microg twice daily, stepping treatment down to a lower dose of FSC 100/50 microg twice daily is more effective than switching to an inhaled corticosteroid alone.     

Response of preschool children with asthma symptoms to fluticasone propionate

BACKGROUND: Many uncertainties remain in the diagnosis and treatment of preschool children with asthma symptoms. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the subgroups of preschool children (aged 12-47 months) with recurrent asthma symptoms most likely to respond to inhaled fluticasone propionate (200 microg/d). METHODS: Subgroups of pooled data from 2 similar 12-week multicenter studies were analyzed. RESULTS: Children with frequent symptoms (symptoms on > or =3 days per week and a total of > or =75% days with symptoms during the 4-week run-in period; n = 169) showed a significantly greater increase in days without symptoms after fluticasone propionate treatment (0% to 45%) compared with after placebo treatment (0% to 25%, P =.005). Children with a family history of asthma (n = 213) also had a significantly greater increase in days without symptoms after fluticasone propionate (11% to 54%) compared with after placebo (7% to 35%, P =.002) and a significantly higher proportion of exacerbation-free patients (61% to 76%, P =.02). Children with less frequent symptoms, no family history of asthma, or both showed no significant treatment effect. There seemed to be no association between response to fluticasone propionate and history of rhinitis or eczema or the number of previous exacerbations. CONCLUSIONS: Children with frequent symptoms, a family history of asthma, or both showed the greatest response to fluticasone propionate treatment. These findings may help to predict treatment outcome and guide the management of preschool children with recurrent asthma symptoms.