Constrictive pericarditis: early and late complication of cardiac surgery.

Constrictive pericarditis is not considered a complication of cardiac surgery. However, three cases are presented in which equalization of diastolic pressures and the ventricular pressure pattern of early diastolic dip-late diastolic plateau, characteristic of restrictive disease, appeared after cardiac surgery. In one patients cardiac constriction developed less than 2 weeks after surgery, and loculated clotted and unclotted viscous blood was removed from the pericardial space. In the other two patients the pericardial space was obliterated by dense adhesions. Thus constrictive pericarditis should be considered in postoperative patients who either do not recuperate satisfactorily after surgery or whose condition deteriorates after initial recovery.     

Comparison of effectiveness and safety of operations on the pericardium

A ten-year experience with operations on the pericardium in 71 consecutive patients was reviewed. The patients ranged in age from nine months to 75 years old. Fifty-three patients were operated upon for pericardial effusion and 14 for pericardial constriction. Sixty-seven patients had pericarditis: 21 of them underwent subxiphoid tube drainage; ten, limited pericardiectomy; and the remaining 36, extensive pericardiectomy. There were two trauma victims who underwent diagnostic pericardiotomy. Two patients underwent excision of pericardial cysts. There was one operative death during extensive pericardiectomy for constrictive tuberculous pericarditis. Thirty-day mortality was three of 21 patients after subxiphoid tube drainage, three of ten after limited pericardiectomy and five of 36 after extensive pericardiectomy. Postoperative complications consisted of pulmonary problems in four patients (two after pericardiectomy and two after extensive pericardiectomy), cardiac arrhythmia in one patient after tube drainage and postpericardiotomy syndrome in one patient after extensive pericardiectomy. Mean follow-up was 3.2 years. Recurrent pericardial effusion occurred in two patients; one had limited pericardiectomy but did not require reoperation and one had diagnostic pericardiotomy without drainage. Six patients with persistent postirradiation pericardial effusion were treated effectively with extensive pericardiotomy. Our experience indicates that subxiphoid tube drainage is effective for the treatment of pericardial effusion and safer than limited pericardiectomy, while extensive pericardiectomy is the operation of choice for pericardial constriction and radiation-related pericardial effusion.     

Transient postoperative pericardial constriction in a child

Constrictive pericarditis has been defined classically as a progressive condition, characterized by pericardial fibrosis, with or without calcification, which results in chronic refractory congestive heart failure and for witch pericardiectomy is often required. In the last decades there have been reports describing a transient form of constrictive pericarditis, which resolves without surgical therapy. This "fibroelastic form" would represent the acute or subacute phase of constriction. In many patients, pericardial inflammation continues and pericardial fibrosis and calcification develop, leading to a chronic and rigid constrictive pericarditis. However, in some patients, pericardial inflammation resolves without progressing to chronic constrictive pericarditis. We report a 7 year old boy, who developed clinical and echocardiographical findings of pericardial constriction 5 weeks after a cardiac surgery, which resolved with steroid therapy.     

Presentation pattern and management of effusive-constrictive pericarditis in Ibadan

Background: Effusive-constrictive pericarditis is a syndrome in which constriction by the visceral pericardium occurs in the presence of a dense effusion in a free pericardial space. Treatment of this disease is problematic because pericardiocentesis does not relieve the impaired filling of the heart and surgical removal of the visceral pericardium is challenging. We sought to provide further information by addressing the evolution and clinico-pathological pattern, and optimal surgical management of this disease. Methods: We conducted a prospective review of a consecutive series of five patients managed in the cardiothoracic surgery unit of University College Hospital, Ibadan, in the previous year, along with a general overview of other cases managed over a seven-year period. This was followed by an extensive literature review with a special focus on Africa. Results: The diagnosis of effusive-constrictive pericarditis was established on the basis of clinical findings of features of pericardial disease with evidence of pericardial effusion, and echocardiographic finding of constrictive physiology with or without radiological evidence of pericardial calcification. A review of our surgical records over the previous seven years revealed a prevalence of 13% among patients with pericardial disease of any type (11/86), 22% of patients presenting with effusive pericardial disease (11/50) and 35% who had had pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis (11/31). All five cases in this series were confirmed by a clinical scenario of non-resolving cardiac impairment despite adequate open pericardial drainage. They all improved following pericardiectomy. Conclusion: Effusive-constrictive pericarditis as a subset of pericardial disease deserves closer study and individualisation of treatment. Evaluating patients suspected of having the disease affords clinicians the opportunity to integrate clinical features and non-invasive investigations with or without findings at pericardiostomy, to derive a management plan tailored to each patient. The limited number of patients in this series called for caution in generalisation. Hence our aim was to increase the sensitivity of others to issues raised and help spur on further collaborative studies to lay down guidelines with an African perspective.     

Surgery for chronic pericarditis--thirty-years' experience

During the past 3 decades, surgical treatment was performed on 75 cases with chronic exsudative or constrictive pericarditis, except for cases suffered from malignant tumor or trauma. Among 7 cases with chronic exsudative pericarditis, 5 underwent pericardiectomy and 2 had a fenestration of the pericardium. As for constrictive pericarditis, pericardiectomy was performed on 68 cases. Excellent surgical results were obtained. The ages of the cases with constrictive pericarditis, who underwent surgery, were significantly higher in the last decade, and the occurrence of pericardial tuberculosis significantly decreased in the last 2 decades. Although pericardiectomy has been performed for constrictive pericarditis without exception, it also plays an important role in the treatment of chronic exsudative pericarditis, especially for cholesterin or tuberculous pericarditis.     

Echocardiography: Pericardial thickening and constrictive pericarditis

A total of 167 patients with pericardial thickening noted on M mode echocardiography were studied retrospectively. After the echocardiogram, 72 patients underwent cardiac surgery, cardiac catheterization or autopsy for various heart diseases; 96 patients had none of these procedures. In 49 patients the pericardium was directly visualized at surgery or autopsy; 76 percent of these had pericardial thickening or adhesions. In another 8 percent, pericardial adhesions were absent, but no comment had been made about the appearance of the pericardium itself. In the remaining 16 percent, no comment had been made about the pericardium or pericardial space. Cardiac catheterization in 64 patients revealed 24 with hemodynamic findings of constrictive pericarditis or effusive constrictive disease.Seven echocardiographic patterns consistent with pericardial adhesions or pericardial thickening are described and related when possible to the subsequent findings at heart surgery or autopsy. The clinical diagnoses of 167 patients with pericardial thickening are presented. The hemodynamic diagnosis of constrictive pericardial disease was associated with the echocardiographic finding of pericardial thickening, but there were no consistent echocardiographic patterns of pericardial thickening diagnostic of constriction. However, certain other echocardiographic abnormalities of left ventricular posterior wall motion and interventricular septal motion and a high E-F_o slope were suggestive of constriction.     

Delayed pericardial disease after radiotherapy

Delayed chronic constrictive pericarditis developed in seven patients 51 to 268 (mean 116) months after radiotherapy. Six of the seven complained of exertional dyspnea that was initially believed to be caused by mediastinal fibrosis. All patients had raised jugular venous pressure, although in two patients this finding was not appreciated by the primary physician. There were no consistent noninvasively identifiable features to allow prediction of constrictive pericarditis other than consideration of its existence and careful examination of the cardiovascular system. All patients had constrictive pericarditis proved at cardiac catheterization. Of the five patients who underwent pericardiectomy, two had an excellent functional result, one has residual pericardial constriction and two died of unrelated causes. Recommendations for the treatment of radiation-induced pericardial disease are given.     

Management of constrictive pericarditic in the 21st century

Definitive treatment for constrictive pericarditis is surgical pericardiectomy. Because constriction may be transient in a small proportion of patients, particularly those with exudative effusions, the initial treatment for constrictive pericarditis should be conservative, with loop diuretic therapy to manage volume expansion and edema and the use of colchicine, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, or, if necessary, glucocorticoid therapy for active inflammation. For subjects with persisting evidence of constriction, symptomatic management is advised for those with only minimal symptoms. Surgical pericardiectomy is advised for subjects with New York Heart Association class II or III symptoms and persisting evidence of constriction at echocardiography and cardiac catheterization and with associated pericardial abnormality on CT or MRI. Complete resection of the pericardium and, where possible, the diseased epicardium via a midline sternotomy is the favored approach, although a video-assisted thoracoscopic approach may be suitable in some subjects. Lateral thoracotomy should be used for suppurative pericarditis to avoid sternal infection. Because of higher mortality, increased complication rates, and suboptimal clinical outcomes, pericardiectomy should be avoided in older patients or those with radiation-induced disease, very advanced symptoms, or evidence of myocardial fibrosis.     

PERICARDITIS (WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO TUBERCULOUS PERICARDITIS)

In this study diseases of the pericardium which dominate the clinical picture have been analysed. In essence this means a discussion of infective pericarditis. Pericarditis is a common disorder in Cape Town, South Africa, particularly among the Bantu and Cape Coloured population. The high incidence in the non-White races is attributed to tuberculosis, mainly as a result of socio-economic conditions. Tuberculosis was found to be the cause in 40% of the patients; the diagnosis was established by the finding of pericardial fluid, which gave positive results on testing for tuberculosis, positive histological evidence or adequate evidence of associated organ tuberculosis. In another 40% of patients, tuberculosis appeared to be the most likely cause of the condition, on clinical grounds which are described. Twelve per centum of cases were due to causes unknown, a tuberculous or viral cause being the most likely. In 6% of cases the pericarditis was pyogenic. A few other uncommon conditions were also present. The clinical syndromes of dry pericarditis, pericarditis with effusion and constrictive pericarditis are described. The most important symptom is a distinctive type of chest pain due to inflammation of the pericardium. The important findings are a pericardial friction rub, systemic venous hypertension and pulsus paradoxus. Sudden splitting of the second sound in inspiration is more characteristic than the early third heart sound, and occurs far more frequently. The electrocardiogram is usually abnormal, drawing attention to the heart, but not very helpful in establishing the diagnosis. The findings on X-ray examination confirm the cardiomegaly in cases of effusion and in most cases of constrictive pericarditis. A cardiac shadow of normal size was uncommonly seen, and pericardial calcification occurred in a minor proportion of the cases in this series. Cardiac catheterization and angiocardiography was seldom required to establish the diagnosis. The pericardium should be aspirated whenever an effusion is suspected, and aspiration is a safe procedure with an electrode needle under electrocardiographic control. The course of pericardial effusion and constrictive pericarditis (in 195 and 220 patients respectively) is discussed, with particular reference to tuberculosis. With tuberculous pericardial effusions from which acid-fast bacilli were recovered there was an extremely high incidence of progression of the condition to constrictive pericarditis requiring surgery. Even when the fluid was sterile, most patients developed constriction and surgery was usually required, but the rate of ultimate cure was over 90%. Of 195 patients presenting with pericardial effusion, irrespective of the cause over half developed the signs of constrictive pericarditis, and 40% required surgery. A small but significant percentage of patients, however, can pass through the phase of constriction and ultimately recover without operation. There were 220 patients with constrictive pericarditis. In 38 the process was chronic, the only effective treatment being surgical. Seventy-eight presented with active pericarditis producing constriction without effusion. Most of these required surgical treatment, but a quarter recovered on conservative therapy alone. The remaining 104 developed pericardial constriction after their disease had passed through a phase of effusion, surgery being necessary for 75%. The overall surgical results were better than the results of medical therapy, which consisted of the use of antituberculous drugs, digitalis and diuretics. Surgery has a great deal to offer in the treatment of pericarditis, but the time to recommend this procedure must be carefully chosen.     

Echocardiographic diagnosis of pericardial disease.

Echocardiograms were performed in 11 patients with constrictive pericarditis or effusive-constrictive pericarditis confirmed by cardiac catheterization and pericardiectomy. Three echocardiographic patterns of pericardial disease were noted and were related to three types of pericardial pathology. Parallel moving echoes separated by a clear space were reflected from chronically fibrosed and thickened pericardium without associated pericardial exudate. Effusive-constrictive pericarditis or subacute wet pericarditis was characterized on the echocardiogram by a posterior echo-free space representing the liquid pericardial effusion and multiple ultrasonic lines from the thickened visceral pericardium. Subacute dry pericarditis was associated with numerous ultrasonic signals filling the space between the visceral pericardium and the relatively flat parietal pericardium. These ultrasonic signals were reflected from coagulated pericardial exudate which was adherent both to the parietal pericardium and the visceral pericardium. Parallel moving echoes or dense bands of echoes were reflected from either or both thickened visceral and parietal pericardium.     

Constrictive pericarditis as a late complication of heart operations

Constrictive pericarditis is a rare complication of previous cardiac surgery, the rate of incidence being approximately 0.1 to 0.3%. Until now about 60 cases have been documented. With increasing frequency of surgical procedures, especially bypass operations, cardiac surgery plays a major role in the etiology of pericardial constriction. In our own series of 12 consecutive pericardiectomies previous cardiac surgery was in 4 cases responsible for the constriction. These cases are presented in detail. A correct diagnosis is difficult and - as in our own cases - often not noticed for a long period of time because the symptoms are obliterated by the primary heart disease and the previous operation. In our own patients the diagnosis was eventually established by echocardiography and then confirmed by right sided heart catheterization. Due to the late diagnosis the results of pericardiectomy - considered the method of choice - were only poor. Two patients, both in a very bad overall condition, died soon after surgery. The remaining 2 patients recovered satisfactorily. Regarding the pathogenesis, hematomas seem to play a leading role in the development of subsequent pericardial fibrosis. Typically the patients present symptoms of a prolonged pericarditis soon after the original surgical intervention. The time between cardiac surgery and the development of constrictive features varies between weeks and years. The postoperative course of patients with excessive postoperative bleeding or larger pericardial effusions should be watched carefully, keeping the possibility of later pericardial constriction in mind.     

Constrictive pericarditis after cardiac surgery

Forty-five patients were identified as having constrictive pericarditis after cardiac surgery. The mean patient age was 61 years (range, 40 to 77 years). Twenty-three of 37 patients with adequate clinical information were reported to have had a diagnosis of postpericardiotomy syndrome after the original surgery. The mean interval from original surgery to presentation with constriction was 23.4 months (range, 1 to 204 months). Computerized tomography was helpful in establishing a diagnosis of constriction in 23 of 29 patients (79%). Bypass graft patency was 93% (85 of 91 grafts). Severe pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery systolic pressure greater than or equal to 60 mm Hg) was present in nine patients; 8 had coexistent valvular disease (seven cases of mitral valve disease, and aortic valve disease in one). Thirty-seven of the 45 patients underwent pericardial stripping, 28 of whom experienced marked symptomatic improvement. One patient had persistent right heart failure, which was not documented to be secondary to constriction. Four patients had persistent constrictive physiologic conditions. Three of these patients had more extensive pericardial stripping and showed clinical improvement. Four patients (11%) died within 30 days of stripping. Eight patients received medical therapy alone. The decision to treat patients medically was based either on favorable response to medical therapy (five patients), or poor general clinical status.     

Constrictive pericarditis: A reminder of a not so rare disease

Constrictive pericarditis is a rare condition characterized by clinical signs of right heart failure subsequent to loss of pericardial compliance. The etiology of constrictive pericarditis has changed during the last decades in developed countries. While, in the past, tuberculosis and idiopathic pericardial constriction were the prevalent causes of the disease, cardiac surgery has become one of the main reasons for its development in recent years. However, cases defined as idiopathic constrictive pericarditis are still observed. In addition to the classical chronic and subacute forms, new presentations, such as effusive-constrictive, localized, transient, occult, and constrictive pericarditis with normal pericardial thickness, have been described. Although conservative treatment may alleviate the patient's symptoms, pericardiectomy remains the only definitive treatment for the disease. It is worth noting that the sooner the diagnosis of pericardial constriction is established, the better the outcome is. The pathophysiological features, clinical findings, diagnostic tools, and therapeutic approach to constrictive pericarditis are detailed in this review.     

Effusive-constrictive pericarditis

Effusive-constrictive pericarditis (ECP) is an increasingly recognized clinical syndrome. It has been best characterized in patients with tamponade who continue to have elevated intracardiac pressure after the removal of pericardial fluid. The disorder is due to pericardial inflammation causing constriction in conjunction with the presence of pericardial fluid under pressure. The etiology is diverse with similar causes to constrictive pericarditis and the condition is more prevalent with certain etiologies such as tuberculous pericarditis. The diagnosis is most accurately made using simultaneous intrapericardial and right atrial pressure measurements with pericardiocentesis, although non-invasive Doppler hemodynamic assessment can assess residual hemodynamic findings of constriction following pericardiocentesis. The clinical presentation has considerable overlap with other pericardial syndromes and as yet there are no biomarkers or non-invasive findings that can accurately predict the condition. Identifying patients with ECP therefore requires a certain index of clinical suspicion at the outset, and in practice, a proportion of patients may be identified once there is objective evidence for persistent atrial pressure elevation after pericardiocentesis. Although a significant number of patients will require pericardiectomy, a proportion of patients have a predominantly inflammatory and reversible pericardial reaction and may improve with the treatment of the underlying cause and the use of anti-inflammatory medications. Patients should therefore be observed for the improvement on these treatments for a period, whenever possible, before advocating pericardiectomy. Imaging modalities identifying ongoing pericardial inflammation such as contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging or nuclear imaging may identify those subsets more likely to respond to medical therapies. Pericardiectomy, if necessary, requires removal of the visceral pericardium.     

Constrictive pericarditis as a complication of coronary artery bypass surgery

Although it is now recognised as a rare complication of cardiac surgery, constrictive pericarditis was diagnosed in three patients after coronary artery bypass surgery. The time interval between cardiac surgery and the development of constrictive features varied from two to six weeks. All three patients presented with severe congestive heart failure. Haemodynamic findings were characteristic of constrictive pericarditis. Pericardial thickening detected by computed tomography in one patient was useful in establishing a definite diagnosis. One of the patients had a serous constrictive effusive pericarditis, and surgical pericardial drainage was needed. The other patient underwent pericardiectomy with preservation of the grafts. The diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis should be considered in patients presenting with unexplained right sided heart failure after cardiac surgery.     

Lassa fever associated with effusive constrictive pericarditis and bilateral atrioventricular annular constriction: a case report

A case of Lassa fever associated with effusive constrictive pericarditis and bilateral atrioventricular annular constriction was reported. A 49-year-old man, who had been diagnosed by indirect fluorescent antibody test as the first case of Lassa fever in Japan, was referred to the Hiroo Hospital because of syncope, progressive hepatomegaly, ascites and pericardial effusion in spite of pericardiocentesis and corticosteroid therapy. On admission, his blood pressure was 92/60 mmHg and he had a paradoxical pulse. Two-dimensional echocardiography revealed a localized pericardial effusion adjacent to the right ventricular wall and behind the left ventricular posterior wall. Bilateral atrioventricular annular constriction was also present. On pulsed Doppler echocardiography, the peak inflow velocities of the right and left ventricles increased during atrial systole. Right heart catheterization revealed a mean diastolic pressure gradient of 8 mmHg across the tricuspid valve. After pericardiectomy, a diastolic dip and plateau pattern became evident in the right ventricular pressure tracing, suggesting the presence of residual constriction. However, the atrioventricular annular constriction was no longer evident on two-dimensional echocardiography. This is considered the first reported case of subacute effusive constrictive pericarditis caused by Lassa fever.     

Constrictive pericarditis as a complication of coronary artery bypass surgery.

Although it is now recognised as a rare complication of cardiac surgery, constrictive pericarditis was diagnosed in three patients after coronary artery bypass surgery. The time interval between cardiac surgery and the development of constrictive features varied from two to six weeks. All three patients presented with severe congestive heart failure. Haemodynamic findings were characteristic of constrictive pericarditis. Pericardial thickening detected by computed tomography in one patient was useful in establishing a definite diagnosis. One of the patients had a serous constrictive effusive pericarditis, and surgical pericardial drainage was needed. The other patient underwent pericardiectomy with preservation of the grafts. The diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis should be considered in patients presenting with unexplained right sided heart failure after cardiac surgery.     

Constrictive pericarditis impressing and narrowing the ascending aorta

A 77-year-old male patient was admitted to our institution with 1-year history of progressive dyspnea on exertion, and lower extremity edema. His chest x-ray showed a circumferential pericardial calcification and right-sided pleural effusion. The electrocardiography revealed atrial fibrillation with low voltage in all derivations and diffuse nonspecific T-wave inversions. The transesophageal echocardiography showed a thickened pericardium with biatrial enlargement and normal right and left ventricular systolic functions. A thick echogenic structure that caused impression and narrowing of the ascending aorta was observed. Simultaneous right and left heart catheterization showed elevation and equalization of right-sided and left-sided diastolic filling pressures, with characteristic dip and plateau. Aortic angiogram showed the ascending aorta was impressed and narrowed by calcified pericardium. Cine magnetic resonance imaging showed pericardial calcifications impressing and narrowing of the ascending aorta. All these findings were consistent with constrictive pericarditis. The patient had no history of tuberculosis, cardiac surgery, or mediastinal irradiation. His HIV antibody test was negative. Marked pericardial thickening and calcifications were evident during pericardiectomy. Histological analysis of the pericardium showed dense collageneous matrix, mild chronic inflammation and calcification. The culture of pericardial tissue revealed no identifiable cause including tuberculosis. The patient was diagnosed as idiopathic constrictive pericarditis. The patient's symptoms and edema decreased remarkably after pericardial stripping. He remained well at 1-year follow-up .     

A modern approach to tuberculous pericarditis

The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic has been associated with an increase in all forms of extrapulmonary tuberculosis including tuberculous pericarditis. Tuberculosis is responsible for approximately 70% of cases of large pericardial effusion and most cases of constrictive pericarditis in developing countries, where most of the world's population live. However, in industrialized countries, tuberculosis accounts for only 4% of cases of pericardial effusion and an even smaller proportion of instances of constrictive pericarditis. Tuberculous pericarditis is a dangerous disease with a mortality of 17% to 40%; constriction occurs in a similar proportion of cases after tuberculous pericardial effusion. Early diagnosis and institution of appropriate therapy are critical to prevent mortality. A definite or proven diagnosis is based on demonstration of tubercle bacilli in pericardial fluid or on histologic section of the pericardium. A probable or presumed diagnosis is based on proof of tuberculosis elsewhere in a patient with otherwise unexplained pericarditis, a lymphocytic pericardial exudate with elevated biomarkers of tuberculous infection, and/or appropriate response to a trial of antituberculosis chemotherapy. Treatment consists of 4-drug therapy (isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol) for 2 months followed by 2 drugs (isoniazid and rifampicin) for 4 months regardless of HIV status. It is uncertain whether adjunctive corticosteroids are effective in reducing mortality or pericardial constriction, and their safety in HIV-infected patients has not been established conclusively. Surgical resection of the pericardium is indicated for those with calcific constrictive pericarditis or with persistent signs of constriction after a 6 to 8 week trial of antituberculosis treatment in patients with noncalcific constrictive pericarditis.