经桡动脉途径穿刺全脑血管造影60例临床分析

目的 探讨经桡动脉途径穿刺全脑血管造影的可行性及安全性.方法 选择60例Allen试验阳性,无手术禁忌证的患者,在局麻下以桡动脉为穿刺点,采用Seldinger技术,在0.035英寸超滑导丝引导下,用5 F猪尾导管及5 F Simmons 3型导管,分别行主动脉弓及全脑血管造影.结果 60例患者中58例顺利完成手术,成功率96.7%(58/60),2例桡动脉穿刺失败者改穿同侧肱动脉成功完成手术.无手部缺血、桡动脉搏动消失及其他严重并发症.结论 经桡动脉进行全脑血管造影操作安全可行,成功率高、并发症少,对适宜病例可作为首选途径,值得推广应用.     

5F共用型造影导管经桡动脉径路冠状动脉的临床应用

目的:探讨使用较小直径(5F)共用型造影导管经桡动脉径路诊断性的冠脉造影在基层医院应用的可行性。方法:选择我院经桡动脉径路冠状动脉造影共175例病人,分为Judkins导管组(85例)和共用型导管组(90例),比较上述两组手术成功率,造影平均手术操作时间和x线透视时间。结果:共用型造影导管组造影成功率为97.8％。而Judkins导管组为94.1％,共用型造影导管组平均手术操作时间和x线透视时间分别为25.1±10.1分和6.21±4.89分,而Judkins导管组为32.1±19.8和7.46±5.62分,均明显长于共用型造影导管组P<0.01。结论:使用较小直径的共用型造影导管经桡动脉径路冠脉造影操作简便快速,x线照射时间短、并发症少、成功率高。     

老年患者冠状动脉慢性闭塞病变介入治疗中经桡动脉进行对侧血管造影定位导丝

目的　评价老年患者冠状动脉慢性闭塞病变介入治疗中经桡动脉途径进行对侧血管造影定位导丝的安全性及有效性。方法　选择性介入治疗的慢性闭塞患者 9例 ,其中女性 2例 ,男性 7例 ,平均年龄 (72± 6 )岁 ,所有患者Allen试验均为阳性。冠状动脉造影显示前降支闭塞 5例 ,回旋支闭塞 3例 ,右冠闭塞 1例。血管闭塞的平均时间为 (4 .6± 2 .1)个月。首先进行常规右侧股动脉穿刺 ,送入导引导管及导丝 ,然后穿刺右侧桡动脉经 5F鞘管送入造影导管至对侧冠状动脉开口处。经股动脉将导丝送至闭塞血管病变处 ,通过桡动脉造影导管注入造影剂使靶血管远端显影 ,判断导丝是否在靶血管腔中。经验证明确导丝位置后进行球囊扩张及支架置入。结果　 9例患者全部成功施行PTCA及支架置入术 ,术中无冠状动脉夹层瘤及穿孔等并发症发生 ,住院期间症状明显改善。减轻了患者双侧股动脉加压包扎的痛苦。结论　由于老年患者的血管弹性降低 ,介入治疗冠状动脉慢性闭塞病变时容易出现血管病发症 ,给介入治疗造成一定困难 ,在介入治疗中必须小心谨慎及时判断导丝所在位置。我们的观察发现 ,经桡动脉进行对侧血管造影 ,通过侧枝循环使慢性闭塞病变远端显影判断导丝位置是另一有效安全的途径     

经桡动脉行冠状动脉造影操作失败26例原因分析

传统的经股动脉冠状动脉造影对血管创伤大,术后穿刺患侧肢体需制动24h,出血、血肿等局部并发症发生率高达5％-7％,Kiemeneij等首次报道经桡动脉冠状动脉造影对血管刨伤小,术后患者能即刻下床活动,且并发症发生率低。但此方法对操作者要求较高,需要有娴熟的技巧和耐心,并对桡动脉-主动脉解剖途径有较深刻的了解方能较好的完成。一般来说,经桡动脉途径行冠脉造影,穿刺桡动脉是否成功是关键,也是难点之一。笔者回顾性分析2005年6月-2006年12月在我科行经桡动脉冠状动脉造影患者操作失败及并发症的原因。     

经桡动脉径路5F多功能造影管全脑血管造影45例

目的探讨在基层医院经桡动脉径路5F多功能造影管全脑血管造影的可行性及安全性。方法45例患者,局麻下经桡动脉径路用5F多功能造影管行全脑血管造影。结果45例患者中43例顺利完成手术,成功率95.6%。1例桡动脉穿刺失败,1例患者左颈总动脉开口位置变异,未能进行相应血管造影。无手部缺血、桡动脉闭塞及其他严重并发症。结论经桡动脉径路5F多功能造影管进行全脑血管造影安全可行,成功率高,并发症少,对适应病例可作为首选途径,在基层医院可推广应用。     

25例经左桡动脉途径行冠状动脉连同肾动脉造影分析

经股动脉途径用Judkin。左右冠状动脉造影导管进行诊断性冠状动脉造影,并用Judkins右冠状动脉造影导管行左右肾动脉造影,已在临床上得到了广泛的应用。1989年campeau等首先报道了经桡动脉途径的心脏导管术,随后这一技术因较股动脉途径术后并发症少,患者更为方便,在临床上得到了广泛的应用。     

经桡动脉和股动脉途径行脑血管造影的对比分析

目的 比较经桡动脉和经股动脉途径行脑血管造影的优缺点.方法 同期82例拟做脑血管造影的患者,按股动脉途径和桡动脉途径分为两组,比较其穿刺时间、穿刺成功率、X线照射时间、制动时间及穿刺部位并发症.结果 股动脉血管穿刺成功率高于桡动脉组,穿刺时间小于桡动脉组,股动脉组术后并发症高于桡动脉组.结论 经桡动脉途径脑血管造影安全可行,并发症少,适合于择期造影者及老年人.经股动脉途径脑血管造影穿刺时间短,成功率高,适用于急症患者.     

经桡动脉途径冠状动脉造影体会

经皮冠状动脉造影（Coronary artery angiography，CAG）作为诊断冠心病的主要手段，其方法在不断改进。近年来，经桡动脉途径冠状动脉造影（Transradial approach，TRA）已逐渐在临床推广应用。我科自2004年底开始采用经桡动脉途径冠状动脉造影术，以2007—01～2008-01我科收治行冠状动脉造影患者，以穿刺成功率、手术时间、透视时间及并发症等为指标，对经股动脉和桡动脉途径CAG进行比较，报告如下。     

左桡动脉远端入路冠状动脉介入诊疗术的安全性和可靠性北大核心CSCD

目的评估经左桡动脉远端穿刺行冠状动脉介入诊疗术的安全性和可靠性。方法选取2019年1月至2020年1月于大连大学附属中山医院接受冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的550例患者为研究对象,其中260例行右桡动脉穿刺,290例行左桡动脉远端穿刺,穿刺成功者分别入组A组、B组。观察两组介入穿刺置管时X线曝光时间、造影使用导管数、完成靶血管重建数、PCI复杂程度以及术后前臂出血、桡动脉并发症等。结果248例(95.4%)患者顺利完成右桡动脉穿刺冠脉诊疗术(A组),277例(95.5%)顺利完成经左桡动脉远端冠脉诊疗术(B组),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组X线曝光时间、造影使用导管数、完成靶血管重建数、PCI复杂程度差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。但B组围术期前臂出血、桡动脉闭塞发生率远小于A组(P<0.01,P=0.036)。结论经左桡动脉远端途径行冠状动脉诊疗术安全可靠,提高了术者和患者舒适性。     

经桡动脉与经股动脉途径冠状动脉造影效果研究

目的：探讨经桡动脉与经股动脉途径穿刺行冠状动脉介入造影的效果研究。方法：同时期216例拟行冠状动脉造影的前瞻性对照,经桡动脉组106例,对照组（经股动脉组）110例,对比观察其成功率、并发症、X线曝光时间及对比剂用量等。结果：两组间X线曝光时间、对比剂用量差异无显著性,经桡动脉组穿刺成功率稍低于经股动脉组（95.4%vs100%,P＆lt;0.05）,而并发症则经桡动脉组低于经股动脉组（3.0%vs 8.2%,P＆lt;0.05）。结论：经桡动脉途径行冠状动脉是安全、有效的方法。     

Transradial cerebral angiography: technique and outcomes

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The transradial approach is routinely used for coronary angiography, but only limited data exist regarding transradial cerebral angiography. The purpose of this report was to offer detailed procedural methods for transradial cerebral angiography to facilitate adoption of the technique. METHODS: We reviewed 60 consecutive cases of transradial access used for neuroangiography and catalogued the indications for angiography, the sheath size, the catheter type, the length of the procedure, the number of cases in which radial artery access was unsuccessful, and the complications. We also noted procedural details regarding adjunctive medications, preprocedural patient assessment, and postprocedural care. RESULTS: Transradial angiography was successfully applied in 57 of 60 cases (51 diagnostic, six interventional, three failed accesses). Sheaths were used in all cases and ranged in size from 4F to 6F. Mean procedural time for diagnostic cases was 40 minutes +/- 19 [SD]. Access-site complications included one forearm hematoma. CONCLUSION: Transradial angiography is a useful tool for diagnostic and interventional neuroangiographic procedures. All relevant vessels can be accessed from the radial artery for diagnostic studies. Interventions in the right vertebral and carotid systems are facilitated by the transradial approach.     

Usefulness of transradial angiography and interventional angiography for abdominal diseases: comparison with transfemoral or transbrachial approach

Transradial angiography has recently emerged as an alternative to the transfemoral or transbrachial approach, especially for coronary or cerebral procedures. However, there are few such studies regarding abdominal angiography. In our institution, we performed abdominal angiography and intervention by the transradial arterial method in 42 cases using a 120-cm-long 4 Fr catheter and compared the results with the transfemoral or transbrachial arterial method and examined the usefulness of this technique. Puncture was successfully carried out in 42 cases, whereas failure occurred in one case, in which the transbrachial method was adopted because of weak pulse. Selective catheter insertion was successful in all cases, after the shape of the catheter had been improved. No serious or dangerous complications occurred during the examinations. In addition, many patients chose the radial arterial method for subsequent examinations on a questionnaire survey we gave patients on the day after we did abdominal angiography by the transradial arterial method. We consider that the transradial arterial method can be used generally in angiography and interventional angiography for abdominal diseases.     

无鞘7F普通导引导管经桡动脉介入治疗冠状动脉病变临床效果

目的 比较经桡动脉无鞘7F普通导引导管和常规6F鞘导引导管治疗冠状动脉病变的有效性和安全性.方法 回顾性分析2014年1月至2015年6月连续接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)手术的160例冠状动脉病变患者临床资料.随机分为无鞘组(n=80)和有鞘组(n=80),比较两种方法的导引导管到位、桡动脉创口压迫时间、止血成功、桡动脉痉挛、桡动脉术后血管直径、远端肿胀消退时间、前臂疼痛或不适、前臂血肿、假性动脉瘤、桡动脉闭塞、皮肤缺血坏死等.结果 无鞘组、有鞘组术中发生桡动脉痉挛分别为9例、2例,前臂疼痛或不适分别为7例、1例,差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05).两组导引导管到位、桡动脉创口压迫时间、前臂血肿、止血成功、桡动脉术后直径、桡动脉闭塞及皮肤缺血坏死间差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 与常规6F鞘导引导管相比,桡动脉无鞘7F普通导引导管治疗冠状动脉病变安全有效.     

The transradial approach for selective carotid and vertebral angiography

Purpose:
The transradial approach is not so popular in cerebral angiography. The purpose of this study was therefore to present our experience of success rate and safety of this method. Material and Methods:
From December 1998 to June 2001, 526 carotid and vertebral angiographies with DSA were performed via the radial artery. A 1.4-mm catheter was used through a 1.4-mm introducer sheath. We evaluated the procedure as successful if sufficient images for diagnosis were obtained of the bilateral carotid arteries and unilateral vertebral artery. Each patient was reassessed for any complications, occurring until the next morning. The length of time needed for an examination was measured in the last 10 cases. Results:
In all but 5 cases, the procedures were evaluated as successful (99.0%). Unsuccessful cases manifested severe pain at the radial puncture, angiospasm at the radial artery, loop formation at the radial artery, occlusion at the subclavian artery, and an aberrant right subclavian artery. No severe complications including neurological ones were encountered. Minor complications were noted in 17 cases (3.2%): 4 cases of thrombus at the ulnar artery, 1 angiospasm at the radial artery, and 12 cases of small hematoma at the puncture site. The radial approach took 14 min less in the common carotid study and 3 min 30 s less in the internal carotid study than by the femoral approach. Conclusion:
The transradial approach enabled selective studies for carotid and vertebral angiography with a high success rate and safety with few complications.     

经桡动脉冠心病介入诊疗中桡动脉痉挛的发生及其预测因素

目的 探讨经桡动脉入路行冠心病介入诊疗中桡动脉痉挛发生的风险及其预测因素.方法 入选经桡动脉入路行冠心病介入诊疗的患者1 020例,记录所有患者的病史资料及用药方案,均经桡动脉行冠状动脉(冠脉)造影术.测量桡动脉直径并记录动脉解剖异常情况,再行下一步的冠脉造影(CAG)或冠脉介入治疗(PCI).应用Logistic回归...     

Transradial approach for diagnostic selective cerebral angiography: results of a consecutive series of 166 cases

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diagnostic selective cerebral angiography is commonly performed via transfemoral and transbrachial approaches. With these approaches, however, patients occasionally suffer serious complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of a transradial approach as an alternative to the transfemoral and transbrachial approaches. METHODS: Between October 1998 and September 1999, transradial cerebral angiography was performed in 166 consecutive patients in a single center as a diagnostic procedure. Before the procedure, we confirmed the collateral blood supply to the hand from the ulnar artery using a modified Allen test. Regular catheterization techniques were practiced using our newly designed 120-cm-long 4F catheter. In 42 patients, anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy was given perioperatively. RESULTS: Twelve of the 166 patients proved to be poor candidates for the transradial approach, owing to restlessness (n = 9), lack of collateral blood supply via the ulnar artery (n = 2), and brachial artery stenosis (n = 1). The radial artery was successfully punctured and cannulated in the remaining 154 patients. Selective catheterization of the intended vessels was obtained in all carotid and vertebral angiographic procedures with no major vascular complications. CONCLUSION: Compared with transfemoral and transbrachial approaches, the transradial approach is a less invasive and safer technique for selective cerebral angiography and may warrant consideration as a standard procedure. Anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy need not be discontinued for this method.     

Usefulness of selective cerebral angiography by transradial approach

Transradial angiography has recently emerged as an alternative to the transfemoral or transbrachial approach, especially for coronary procedures. However, there have been few studies on cerebral angiography using the transradial approach. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes, complications, and limitations of selective cerebral angiography via the transradial approach. Selective cerebral angiography by the right transradial approach using 100-cm-long 4-F catheters was performed in 83 patients. Using five types of catheters, the success rates of selective catheterization to the right vertebral artery, right common carotid artery, left common carotid artery, and left vertebral artery were 40/44 (91%), 68/68 (100%), 62/62 (100%), and 14/25 (56%), respectively. Puncture failed in one patient, and a guidewire could not be introduced beyond the radial artery loop in one patient. Radial artery spasm occurred in one patient, but was relieved immediately after nitroglycerin injection through the sheath with side holes. Subcutaneous bleeding occurred in six patients, but no obvious hematomas were noted. Occlusion or stenosis of the radial artery occurred in five patients, but no ischemic symptoms were observed in any of the cases. This study suggested that selective cerebral angiography can be performed safely using the transradial approach.     

桡动脉与股动脉入路模拟冠脉造影术患者和术者辐射剂量比较

 目的 比较经桡动脉与经股动脉途径行冠脉造影术中患者及术者的辐射剂量。方法 采用同一拟人体模模拟临床条件下的冠脉造影。根据不同造影入路(均为右侧入路),实验分为经股动脉行冠脉造影组(transfemoral intervention ,TFI)和经桡动脉行冠脉造影组(transradial intervention,TRI),根据不同测量位置和不同辐射防护措施,TFI组进一步分为TFI1-TFI4四个亚组,TRI组进一步分为TRI1-TRI8八个亚组。使用皮肤辐射剂量仪和造影机随机配备的射线剂量仪(DAP和AK)分别记录术者和患者的辐射剂量,使用机器预设程序自动调节造影体位并控制透视及造影时间,每组数据重复测量10次取均值进行比较。结果 TRI组总剂量均值、透视累计剂量均值、造影累计剂量均值较TFI组均明显增加。造影过程7个体位中,DAP、AK值最大的三个体位均为左前斜体位。经桡动脉操作时,使用桡动脉专用护具的各亚组,其术者的辐射剂量均明显低于未使用护具的亚组。结论 与TFI相比,TRI时术者手部、胸部辐射剂量明显高于前者,而胸部辐射剂量的差异在左前斜体位时最为显著,其他体位并不明显;无论何种入路行冠脉造影,患者辐射剂量在左前斜体位时最高。因此术者在操作过程中应该合理使用造影体位,减少不必要的辐射。桡动脉专用护具配合常规防护设备共同使用可以大大减少经桡动脉操作时术者辐射剂量,值得推广。     

Routine transradial access for conventional cerebral angiography: a single operator's experience of its feasibility and safety

The purpose of this study is to describe a single operator's experience with the feasibility and safety of transradial access in conventional cerebral angiography. 153 patients were enrolled consecutively. Among them, 20 patients were not suitable for transradial access. A Simmons catheter was used. Haemostasis was achieved using a compressive dressing of the wrist. We analysed the success rates of the arterial puncture and the successful catheterization rate for each supra-aortic vessel as well as all complications. The arterial access was successful in 96.3%. The supra-aortic vessels were catheterized with success rates of 99.2% (127/128) for the left subclavian artery and 100% for the other arteries. The mean procedure time was 19.3 min (range 10-55 min). Haemostasis was successfully achieved in every case. The most frequent complication was arm pain which occurred in 37 patients (28.9%). In conclusion, transradial selective cerebral angiography with a reversed-angle catheter is technically feasible and safe. It might be helpful in imaging follow-up of patients with arterial stenting or coil embolisation of the cerebral aneurysms. Modification of the catheter design is required to improve the selectivity of the supra-aortic branches.