Pathological changes of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer after monotherapy with bicalutamide 150 mg

OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the morphological changes induced by a 3-month course of neoadjuvant bicalutamide 150 mg/day before radical prostatectomy (RP) on prostatic adenocarcinoma and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 90 patients with cT1-T2 prostate cancer and HGPIN on prostatic biopsy were randomized to receive bicalutamide (150 mg/day for 3 months) before RP, or to have immediate surgery. Surgical specimens were assessed for the histopathological features of cancer, HGPIN and benign epithelium in a blinded manner. The volumes of prostate cancer and HGPIN were evaluated using a stereological (i.e. grid) method. RESULTS: Compared with the bicalutamide-treated group, the ratio of stroma to epithelium, evaluated by visual microscopic assessment in the normal epithelium of the three prostate zones, was significantly lower in the control group, at 2.27 (sd 1.13), than in the treated group, at 1.87 (sd 0.72) (P = 0.048). The mean (sd) tumour volume was significantly lower in the bicalutamide-treated than in the control group, at 0.914 (0.13) vs 1.47 (0.24) mL (P = 0.044). Similarly, the mean (sd) volume of HGPIN was significantly lower in the bicalutamide-treated than in the control group, at 0.34 (0.06) vs 0.62 (0.07) mL (P = 0.003). At RP, specimen Gleason scores in the bicalutamide-treated group were similar to those in the control group, and were no different from the biopsy Gleason scores. CONCLUSIONS: Involution and epithelial shrinkage of prostate cancer and HGPIN were evident after neoadjuvant treatment with bicalutamide 150 mg. There was no evidence of the emergence of higher-grade cancer after treatment.     

Canine prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: Is the comparative model relevant?

BACKGROUND: Histologic sections from an archival collection of a veterinary teaching hospital were examined to determine the likelihood of detection of canine high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasms (HGPIN), as a prelude to use of the canine model of prostatic carcinogenesis for chemopreventive strategies. METHODS: Tissue specimens representing clinically healthy (normal) prostate glands, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and prostatic carcinoma were examined in one tissue plane for histological evidence of HGPIN. RESULTS: No histological evidence of HGPIN was detected in 20 normal prostate glands or 95 prostate glands with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Seven of 20 prostatic carcinomas had synchronous HGPIN. CONCLUSIONS: Histological evidence of HGPIN is unlikely to be detected in the healthy or hyperplastic canine prostate gland with the clinically-procured biopsy. This might diminish the usefulness of canine HGPIN in temporal studies of chemoprevention of prostate cancer. HGPIN was found simultaneously with prostatic carcinoma in more than one-third of the carcinomas examined.     

Age-associated changes in alpha-methyl CoA racemase (AMACR) expression in nonneoplastic prostatic tissues

Alpha-methyl CoA racemase (AMACR) is overexpressed in several human cancers, most notably colon and prostate. AMACR expression in the prostate has been investigated primarily in patients, in an older age group, treated for prostatic carcinoma and benign prostatic hypertrophy. No studies have assessed the age distribution of AMACR expression in normal men. Archival paraffin-embedded prostate tissue from 41 organ donor men (age range, 13-63 years) with no evidence of prostate neoplasia was stained with a monoclonal antibody for AMACR. Intensity was graded on a scale of 0 to 3. Semi-quantitative analysis of staining in acinar cells was used to generate a composite score (CS) [Sigma(% area x intensity)] for each case. Nondonor cases with foci of prostate cancer and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) were used as external positive controls for AMACR. These sections were also stained for Ki-67, to assess proliferative index. The 41 cases encompassed different age groups (13-20 years, N = 11; 20-45 years, N = 17; >45 years, N = 13). Acinar cells showed granular cytoplasmic staining. Focal positive staining was also seen in the prostatic urethra and the periurethral glands. There was wide variation in the level of expression within each age group. The level of expression seen in subjects younger than 45 years was higher (mean CS = 41.3; median CS = 22.5) than that seen in subjects older than 45 years (mean CS = 8.8; median CS = 9.0) with a P value of 0.01. Most cases in the control set of prostatic adenocarcinoma cases showed moderate to strong staining. A negative correlation was seen evaluating CS and age in subjects 20 years of age and older (r = -0.47). Ki-67 staining was variable. 1) AMACR expression can be seen in benign prostatic glandular epithelium, across all age groups. However, it is age-related, with significantly lower expression in subjects younger than 45 years. This could account for the negative staining reported in benign glands, due to biased sampling of the older population. 2) Focal positive staining is seen in the prostatic urethra and periurethral glands in 71% of the cases, with no age correlation. This is of concern because this epithelium could potentially be misinterpreted as foci of PIN. 3) The low expression of AMACR in benign glands in the older age group makes this marker useful in detecting malignancy. However, AMACR staining should be interpreted with caution and the diagnosis of PIN or prostate cancer should be rendered only with convincing histologic evidence. 4) Ki-67 staining was very variable and showed no correlation with age and AMACR expression levels. AMACR expression had no correlation with proliferative index.     

In situ and intraductal epithelial proliferations of prostate: definitions and treatment implications. Part 1: Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? In the era of extended biopsy sampling of the prostate, multifocal high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is associated with a significantly higher rate of cancer diagnosis than unifocal HGPIN or a benign diagnosis. In addition, the cancers that are subsequently diagnosed in men with HGPIN on their initial biopsy tend to be smaller, lower grade and more commonly organ-confined. This has led to a reappraisal of the need and timing of repeat biopsies. The present paper provides a series of recommendations on the optimal timing of repeat biopsies in men with HGPIN on biopsy, based on the current available evidence. This is the first of a two part series reviewing the nature and clinical significance of in situ cellular proliferations in the prostate gland. This first part examines prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), while the second part in the next supplement discusses intraductal carcinoma and ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate. PIN is a precursor lesion in the development of some forms of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. In the 1990 s, high-grade PIN (HGPIN) on biopsy was a significant predictor of carcinoma, but this was due to incomplete sampling with sextant biopsies. With more extensive sampling in the last decade, the likelihood of identifying cancer after a diagnosis of HGPIN is not significantly different from a benign diagnosis. In several recent studies, it is now recognised that multifocal HGPIN is a better predictor of cancer than unifocal HGPIN. Most cases of cancer will be detected in the vicinity of the HGPIN, but up to 40% of cancers will occur in different sextants. In assessing potential markers for carcinoma in men with HGPIN on biopsy, α-methylacyl coenzyme-A racemase (AMACR) has emerged as a promising diagnostic tool. HGPIN with strong staining for AMACR is associated with a higher rate of cancer detection in subsequent biopsies compared with AMACR-negative HGPIN. Also, AMACR positivity in HGPIN is more commonly seen adjacent to carcinoma, and this may provide guidance as to the site of future biopsies.     

AMACR(P504S)、P63、34βE12联合检测在前列腺癌早期诊断中的应用

目的:探讨AMACR(P504S)、P63、34βE12联合检测在前列腺癌(PCa)早期诊断中的临床应用价值。方法:应用即用型组合式单克隆抗体和双酶标记的免疫组化MaxvisionTM一步法检测42例PCa、12例高级别前列腺上皮内瘤变(HGPIN)和30例良性前列腺增生(BPH)穿刺活检标本中AMACR、P63、34βE12的表达情况。比较Glea-son评分各组中AMACR阳性表达情况。结果:AMACR、P63、34βE12抗原在PCa和BPH穿刺标本中的表达差异均有极显著性(P<0.01),PCa组织中AMACR阳性表达率为100%,无P63和34βE12表达;BPH组织中均无AM-ACR表达,P63和34βE12均高表达。HGPIN中AMACR的阳性表达率(91.67%)与BPH差异有极显著性(P<0.01),与PCa差异无显著性(P>0.05);P63和34βE12阳性表达率HGPIN(100%)与PCa差异有极显著性(P<0.01),而与BPH差异无显著性(P>0.05)。AMACR表达强弱与PCa的Gleason评分无关(P>0.05)。结论:AMACR是PCa高度敏感和特异的标志物,P63和34βE12联合标记基底细胞的特异性高,3者联合检测能增加前列腺穿刺活检标本诊断的准确性,在PCa早期诊断中具有重要的临床应用价值。     

The proportion of cores with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on extended-pattern needle biopsy is significantly associated with prostate cancer on site-directed repeat biopsy

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the predictive value of isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) for an unsampled prostate cancer on an extended biopsy is lower due to more thorough prostate sampling, and whether the proportion of cores with HGPIN is associated with prostate cancer, as isolated HGPIN on sextant prostate biopsy is associated with a 27-57% risk of prostate cancer on repeat biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All extended prostate biopsies taken by one urologist over 6 years were reviewed for patients with isolated HGPIN on initial biopsy. Biopsies were evaluated for histological features and the proportion of cores with HGPIN. The clinical characteristics and pathological findings from subsequent biopsies were determined. RESULTS: Of 577 men having extended biopsies, 48 had isolated HGPIN, followed by one to four site-directed repeat biopsies. Although only 10 (21%) had cancer on the first repeat biopsy, overall 15 (31%) had cancer. Those with cancer on repeat biopsy had a significantly higher proportion of cores with HGPIN, i.e. 29% vs 15%, cancer vs no cancer, respectively (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Isolated HGPIN on extended biopsy conferred a 31% risk of unsampled prostate cancer. The proportion of cores with HGPIN on initial biopsy was significantly associated with the risk of cancer. The same was not true for age, race, prostate-specific antigen level, or the findings on digital rectal examination. The significant association between the proportion of cores with HGPIN and the risk of cancer suggests that patients with unifocal HGPIN on extended biopsy be managed expectantly, whereas those with multifocal HGPIN be re-biopsied.     

Widespread high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on prostatic needle biopsy: a significant likelihood of subsequently diagnosed adenocarcinoma

In comparison with earlier studies, recent reports have demonstrated a lower incidence of prostate carcinoma after an initial diagnosis of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN). The latter has led to a general tendency to reconsider the absolute need for a rebiopsy in this setting. The current retrospective study assesses the subsequent likelihood of identifying prostatic adenocarcinoma (PCa) in 41 patients with an initial diagnosis of "widespread" HGPIN defined as HGPIN present in 4 or more biopsy cores. All patients underwent at least 1 follow-up (F/U) sampling procedure in a period of 1 to 41 months. PCa was found in 16/41 patients (39%), all except 1 identified on the first F/U biopsy with the remaining patients diagnosed on a transurethral resection after a negative first F/U biopsy. All but 1 prostatic carcinoma diagnoses were obtained within 2 years from initial biopsy with 10 rendered within the first year. On average, prostate cancer was identified at 10.4 months (range: 1 to 36). One-fourth of all identified prostatic carcinomas were of Gleason score 7 or more. In 4 additional patients (9.7%), F/U biopsy revealed HGPIN with adjacent atypical small glands suspicious but not diagnostic of carcinoma (PINATYP). Of 41 patients, 10 (24.3%) continued to show HGPIN with the remaining 11/41 patients (26.8%) showing benign prostatic tissue. Patients >or=70 years of age at the time of initial biopsy had a statistically significant higher rate of PCa or HGPIN/PINATYP diagnosis on repeat biopsy compared with younger patients (P=0.02), with 55% of older men being diagnosed with cancer as compared with 33% in younger men. Patients with fewer cores sampled on initial biopsy were more likely to be diagnosed with carcinoma as opposed to HGPIN/PINATYP on F/U (P=0.015). Other factors such as the number of F/U procedures, serum prostate-specific antigen level before initial HGPIN biopsy, number of cores per F/U biopsy, and F/U interval length did not affect the likelihood of finding carcinoma. In summary, our study reveals a 39% risk of finding PCa on repeat biopsies obtained after an initial diagnosis of widespread HGPIN. Our findings support the need for a repeat biopsy in this subset of patients.     

The incidence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical glands suspicious for carcinoma on first-time saturation needle biopsy, and the subsequent risk of cancer

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the detection rate and extent of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and atypical glands (AG) suspicious for prostate cancer, and the cancer risk in subsequent biopsies, diagnosed by a first 24-core saturation biopsy, as although the optimum extent of biopsy is controversial there is a trend to increase the number of cores taken, and apart from detecting prostate cancer, identifying HGPIN and AG is associated with a greater risk of finding cancer in subsequent biopsies, thus warranting a closer follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 100 men with consecutive first-time saturation biopsies; the indications for biopsy were an abnormal digital rectal examination and/or a serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of >2.5 ng/mL. Each biopsy specimen was reviewed retrospectively by two pathologists to confirm the histological diagnosis. The number and percentage of cores positive for HGPIN, bilateral involvement and multifocality (HGPIN involving two or more cores) were recorded in each case. The presence of AG and cancer was also recorded. An extended (10-12 cores) repeat biopsy was available in 23 patients. RESULTS: The median (range) age and PSA level of the patients was 63 (41-80) years and 4.9 (1.5-67.0) ng/mL, respectively. Of the 100 patients, 34% had normal findings (benign prostatic tissue, BPT), 39% had cancer, 26% had HGPIN and cancer, 22% had HGPIN alone, and 5% had AG. Repeat biopsies were available in nine of the 22 (41%) patients with HGPIN, four of five with AG, and 10 of the 34 (29%) with BPT. The median (range) interval between the first and second biopsy was 13 (4-36) months. Prostate cancer was detected at the second biopsy in a third of patients with isolated HGPIN on the first biopsy, and one of the four with AG. None of the patients with BPT had cancer on re-biopsy. The cancer detection rate was significantly greater in patients with multifocal than in those with unifocal HGPIN (80% vs none, P = 0.010). The median number of cores and percentage of tissue involved by HGPIN was 3.5 (2-5) and 1.0 (0.5-1.2)%, respectively, in patients with cancer detected in repeat biopsies, compared to 1.0 (1-3) and 0.2 (0.2-0.6)% in patients without cancer on repeat biopsy (P = 0.023 and 0.015, respectively). CONCLUSION: Identifying multifocal HGPIN on first saturation biopsy is associated with an overall cancer detection rate of 80% on repeat 10-12-core biopsy. Although there were few patients, the detection of multifocal HGPIN warrants additional searches for concurrent invasive carcinoma by repeated biopsy.     

Isolated intraepithelial prostatic neoplasia and positive prostate adenocarcinoma results at repeated biopsy. Review of our series

ObjetiveTo review the incidence of isolated prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) as well as the positive prostate cancer results in repeat biopsy in our series of transrectal biopsy of the prostate. We compare these results with the actual literatureMaterials and methodsWe review the 2.475 transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies of the prostate made in our department from January 1992 to June 2004 looking for intraepithelial neoplasia and looking in particular for isolated High-grade PIN ( HGPIN). We review repeat biopsies made at this patients and the likelihood of detecting prostate cancer in them.ResultsThe diagnosis of PIN was found in 31 biopsies, 13 of them were isolated HGPIN what means a 0,52% incidence of the total biopsies performed in our department. We performed 7 repeat biopsies of the 13 cases in a period from 3 months to 2 years after the first biopsy, and we found 3 cases of prostate cancer what means that 43% of isolated HGPIN with repeated biopsy showed prostate cancer. The mean age of the patients studied was 67 years (range 53-88). The median PSA value of the studied cases was 9,8 ng /ml. The Gleason score of the positive biopsies was always between 3 and 7. In our series, age and PSA levels did not have correlation with the positive results for prostate cancer in repeated biopsies.ConclusionIn spite of a lower number of HGPIN cases in our series, the positive for prostate cancer in repeated biopsy ( 43%) is similar to the incidence reported in literature so it is advisable rigorous controls and repeated biopsies for these patients     

Expression and diagnostic utility of alpha-methylacyl-CoA-racemase (P504S) in foamy gland and pseudohyperplastic prostate cancer

Foamy gland and pseudohyperplastic carcinomas are two uncommon variants of prostate cancer and often pose diagnostic challenges on needle biopsies. Alpha-methylacyl-CoA-racemase (AMACR) is a recently discovered tumor marker whose expression is significantly upregulated in prostate cancer. However, the original works only studied ordinary prostate cancer without reference to specific morphologic variants. Therefore, the expression and diagnostic utility of AMACR in specific variants of prostate cancer are unknown. In addition, two different antibodies, one monoclonal and one polyclonal, were used in the previous studies. The goal of this study is to examine the expression pattern and diagnostic utility of AMACR in foamy gland and pseudohyperplastic prostate cancer and to compare the diagnostic utility of the two anti-AMACR antibodies in the same prostate needle biopsy series. Prostate cancer with foamy gland or pseudohyperplastic features was retrieved from the Johns Hopkins Hospital Surgical Pathology file. Thirty needle biopsies harboring prostate cancer with foamy gland features and 17 needle biopsies harboring prostate cancer with pseudohyperplastic features were available for this study. Immunohistochemistry for AMACR was performed with two antibodies, a monoclonal one (P504S) and a polyclonal one (AMACR-p), using previously published protocols. Immunohistochemistry for high molecular weight cytokeratin and p63 was performed to confirm the cancer diagnosis. The AMACR staining intensity was graded as negative, weak, moderate, and strong. Only the staining that was significantly stronger than that of background benign glands was considered positive. A total of 68% and 62% of foamy gland prostate cancer was positive for AMACR with P504S and AMACR-p antibodies, respectively. A total of 77% and 70% of pseudohyperplastic prostate cancer was positive for AMACR with P504S and AMACR-p antibodies, respectively. Staining was often heterogeneous with different staining intensities within the same lesion. The mean percentage of stained glands in positive cases was 74.4% (range 25-100%) with P504S and 78.9% (range 20-100%) with AMACR-p in foamy gland prostate cancer and 91% (range 10-100%) with P504S, and 86.7% (range 10-100%) with AMACR-p in pseudohyperplastic prostate cancer. Seven foci of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia present in the study cases were all positive for AMACR. The two antibodies were not statistically different in their sensitivity and specificity. In conclusion, AMACR is potentially a useful diagnostic marker for foamy gland and pseudohyperplastic prostate cancer in the following setting. When the pathologist favors the diagnosis of these variants of cancer on routine stained sections and stains for basal cells are negative, yet still a definitive diagnosis of cancer is difficult because of the cancers' deceptively benign appearance, positive staining for AMACR can provide the additional confidence to establish a definitive malignant diagnosis. The major caveat in the interpretation of positive staining is that high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia cannot be in the differential diagnosis.     

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) has been established as a precursor to prostatic adenocarcinoma. HGPIN shares many morphological, genetic, and molecular signatures with prostate cancer. Its predictive value for the development of future adenocarcinoma during the prostate-specific antigen screening era has decreased, mostly owing to the increase in prostate biopsy cores. Nevertheless, a literature review supports that large-volume HGPIN and multiple cores of involvement at the initial biopsy should prompt a repeat biopsy of the prostate within 1 year. No treatment is recommended for HGPIN to slow its progression to cancer.     

Apolipoprotein-D: a novel cellular marker for HGPIN and prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is a putative pre-malignant lesion of the prostate. While apolipoprotein-D (Apo-D), an androgen-regulated hydrophobic transporter protein, is expressed in prostate tumors, its expression in HGPIN is unknown. METHODS: Immunoreactivity for Apo-D and another androgen-regulated protein, prostate specific antigen (PSA), was investigated in 64 radical prostatectomy tissues by video image analysis. RESULTS: Eighty two percent of prostatectomy specimens demonstrated moderate to strong Apo-D immunoreactivity in areas of HGPIN. In comparison, weak Apo-D immunoreactivity was observed in non-malignant areas in only 24% of specimens. The median (range) percentage cellular area of HGPIN immunopositive for Apo-D (9.7%, 0-42.9), and the cellular concentration of Apo-D (MIOD 3.1, 0-13.3), were intermediate between that of normal (area 0%, 0-53.5%, MIOD 0, 0-12.6) and early stage prostate cancer tissues (area 29.2%, 0-90.8%, MIOD 6.7, 0-28.1). This increase in Apo-D expression from non-malignant, through HGPIN to prostate cancer was statistically significant (P < 0.001), and contrasted with the decrease observed in PSA staining between adjacent areas of normal glands, HGPIN, and cancer (P = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of high levels of immunoreactive Apo-D in HGPIN and prostate cancer, but not in non-malignant epithelial cells, is consistent with HGPIN being an intermediate lesion in the transition to prostate cancer, and suggests that cellular Apo-D expression is a marker of malignant transformation of the prostate.     

Inverted (Hobnail) high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN): report of 15 cases of a previously undescribed pattern of high-grade PIN.

We report 15 cases of a distinctive and previously unrecognized variant of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) that is characterized by polarization of enlarged secretory cell nuclei toward the glandular lumen. We designate this lesion inverted or hobnail HGPIN. In all cases inverted HGPIN was identified on needle biopsy where it merged with typical micropapillary-tufted HGPIN. Inverted secretory cell nuclei frequently demonstrated less prominent nucleoli than adjacent noninverted secretory cell nuclei, yielding a sense of maturation that falsely suggested a non-neoplastic process. Inverted HGPIN was associated with concurrent prostatic adenocarcinoma in seven cases and with atypical glands suspicious for carcinoma in two other cases, whereas in six other cases inverted HGPIN was the only lesion identified. In both radical prostatectomies that followed these biopsies that were available for review, inverted HGPIN was localized to the peripheral zone of the prostate where it merged with usual forms of HGPIN and carcinoma. Inverted HGPIN is a morphologically distinctive form of HGPIN that shares the association with carcinoma and peripheral zone localization with other recognized forms of HGPIN.     

Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase: a variably sensitive immunohistochemical marker for the diagnosis of small prostate cancer foci on needle biopsy

Expression of the alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) gene has recently been demonstrated by several groups to be markedly elevated in prostate cancer cells with little expression in benign prostate tissue and has been suggested as a molecular marker of prostate cancer on needle biopsy. There is scant data, however, as to the sensitivity and specificity of AMACR in the diagnosis of small foci of cancer on needle biopsy. A total of 209 needle biopsies of the prostate with small foci (<5% of a core) of prostatic adenocarcinoma were identified. A total of 175 cases were received in consultation by one of the authors (140 from a single institution and 35 from different outside institutions) and 34 cases were from our hospital file. Immunohistochemistry for high molecular weight cytokeratin and p63 was performed in all cases to confirm the diagnosis of cancer. Only AMACR staining that was significantly stronger than that of background benign glands was considered positive; 88% of all cases of prostate cancer were positive for AMACR. The sensitivity varied among the different groups: 100% for the in house cases, 87.1% for the cases from a single institution, and 80% for cases from different outside institutions. The mean percentage of stained glands in positive cases was 95.9%, with 150 (71.8%) cases showing 100% of the glands positive and 25 (12.0%) cases showing no staining. Because negative staining for basal cell markers, especially in a small focus of atypical glands, is not necessarily diagnostic of prostate cancer, positive staining for AMACR can increase the level of confidence in establishing a definitive malignant diagnosis. However, the sensitivity of AMACR staining may vary in specimens from different pathology laboratories, possibly related to differences in fixation and processing. It is important to optimize the staining technique for each laboratory and recognize that some small cancers on needle biopsy may be AMACR negative.     

Prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) mRNA expression in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: implications for the development of prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: Prior data clearly demonstrated the expression of prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) mRNA in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) tissues. The purpose of the present investigation was to determine whether PSCA mRNA expression was associated with the presence of cancer in this disease. METHODS: One hundred seventeen men were diagnosed with isolated PIN on initial prostate biopsy, 51 with low-grade form (LGPIN), and 66 with high-grade form (HGPIN). PSCA mRNA expression in initial PIN and subsequent cancer was examined by in situ hybridization (ISH). The differences of the PSCA mRNA expression level between the groups were analyzed by the Chi-square and Student's t-test. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the predictive performance of PSCA mRNA. RESULTS: PSCA mRNA expression level in 34 subsequent cancers was statistically increased compared with their paired PIN (P < 0.001), with a Gleason's dependence. HGPIN showed statistically high PSCA mRNA expression compared with LGPIN (P < 0.01). PSCA mRNA expression levels were significantly stronger in the initial isolated LGPIN and isolated HGPIN with subsequent cancer than those without (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that only PSCA mRNA was predictive of the onset of subsequent cancer in patients with isolated LGPIN and in those with isolated HGPIN, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data identify PSCA mRNA in initial PIN as a significant predictor of subsequent cancer, suggesting that PSCA implies in prostatic tumorigenesis and may be used to identify the patients with isolated PIN who are at high risk for cancer onset in the disease process.     

Predictors of prostate cancer on extended biopsy in patients with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: a multivariate analysis model

OBJECTIVE: To define the importance of extended biopsy in patients with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and to define predictors of cancer in extended biopsy in patients with HGPIN, using multivariate analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 83 patients with previous sextant biopsy of HGPIN had an extended 11-core biopsy taken. Patients with a negative biopsy for cancer were followed by serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination (DRE) every 6 months. The extended biopsy was repeated in 21 patients. The criteria for second biopsy were an increase in PSA and/or abnormal changes on DRE. Overall, 49 patients had a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). The cancer-detection rate on extended biopsy was correlated with risk factors using the chi-square test and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Extended biopsy detected prostate cancer in 30 of the 83 men (36%), with positive cores in only 20 sextant biopsy sites (67%), in only seven in additional sites (23%), and both in three (10%). Of the 21 patients who had repeat extended biopsy, four (19%) had cancers. There were two carcinomas in the 49 TURP specimens (4%). The PSA level, DRE and transrectal ultrasonography findings were not predictive of cancer in extended biopsies (chi-square test). Patient age, PSA density and the number of cores with HGPIN (all P < 0.001) had a significant effect on the cancer-detection rate, and multivariate analysis showed that all three were independent predictors of cancer. A logistic regression model was designed to predict the probability of cancer in extended biopsy, with an overall accuracy of 78%. CONCLUSION: Extended biopsy improved the cancer detection rate by 23% in patients with HGPIN. Patient age, PSA density and the number of cores with HGPIN were the only independent predictors of cancer.     

单纯前列腺上皮内瘤回顾性分析(附142例病例分析)

目的通过对前列腺上皮内瘤(PIN)临床资料分析,探讨PIN的生物特性及应对策略。方法对31例无前列腺癌PIN(NPCaPIN)改变患者(其中1级23例,2、3级8例)的临床资料(包括患者血清PSA、fPSA/tPSA、PSA密度等区域计数资料以及穿刺标本免疫组织化学染色结果)进行回顾性分析,以同期确诊为前列腺癌(PCa)、良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者资料作为对照,分析低级别PIN(LGPIN)和高级别PIN(HGPIN)改变之间及NPCaPIN临床特征与PCa、BPH患者临床特征的差异。结果LGPIN和HGPIN改变的患者之间血清PSA水平和年龄存在差异(P<0.05);LGPIN和PCa患者之间血清PSA水平、前列腺体积、fPSA存在显著差异(P<0.01),PSA密度、fPSA/tPSA比值存在差异(P<0.05),和BPH患者之间各项均无明显差异;HGPIN改变和PCa患者之间前列腺体积、fPSA水平和年龄存在差异(P<0.05),和BPH患者之间血清PSA水平差异显著(P<0.01),fPSA/tPSA比值和年龄(P<0.05)存在差异;NPCaPIN和PCa患者之间血清前列腺体积、fPSA水平和年龄、血清PSA水平、PSA密度存在显著差异(P<0.01),和BPH患者之间fPSA/tPSA比值(P<0.05)存在差异。P63、AE1、AE3、P504S、PSA免疫组织化学结果NPCaPIN组类似于BPH而完全异于PCa。结论LGPIN的临床和病理特征与BPH相似,而HGPIN的临床和病理方面具有一定的前列腺恶性肿瘤特征,需要积极的临床追踪观察。     

Value of magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MSR) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (DCEMR) imaging for the characterization of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) foci

Background

Despite an increasing interest in high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), the clinical suspicious aspect of this premalignant lesion remains poorly characterized. The aim of this study was to analyze the magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MSR) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (DCEMR) imaging features of isolated HGPIN lesions.

Materials and methods

From January 2007 to January 2009, 330 cases were included in a protocol that involve the use of MSR and DCEMR for the diagnosis of prostate diseases. Of these, 27 patients with isolated (no associated prostate cancer diagnosis) HGPIN histologic diagnosis at the first prostate biopsy were included in the present study. All cases were previously submitted to MSR/DCEMR (1.5 T scanner) and, no later than 10 days to a random 12-core biopsy scheme. Biopsy targeting was done in zones corresponding to those analyzed with MSR and DCEMR.

Results

In the 27 patients, 30 HGPIN foci with a diameter of 6 mm or greater were analyzed and compared with 27 peripheral zone areas of normal prostate tissue. With MSR, HGPIN foci were characterized by a significantly higher (P < 0.05) absolute value of choline and choline + creatine/citrate ratio compared with normal tissue. With DCEMR, HGPIN foci were characterized by lower values of all dynamic parameters but differences did not reach statistical significance (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

In our experience, HGPIN lesions can be metabolically characterized by MSR through the absolute value of choline and the choline + creatine/citrate ratio.     

Lesions missed on prostate biopsies in cases sent in for consultation

BACKGROUND: There are no reports on how often lesions are missed on prostate needle biopsies. METHODS: Over a 10-month period, 8/99 to 5/00, 3,251 prostate biopsy cases were seen in consultation. RESULTS: We identified 87 (2.7%) patients with missed lesions (n = 9 academic hospitals; n = 44 community hospitals; n = 34 commercial labs). Overall, 119 lesions were missed in 87 patients. Missed lesions were as follows: small atypical glands suspicious for cancer (41 lesions in 35 patients), prostatic adenocarcinoma (39 cancers in 32 patients), high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) (34 lesions in 30 patients), and HGPIN with adjacent small atypical glands (five lesions in five patients)--some men with more than one type of missed lesion. Detection of the missed lesions would have resulted in either: a definite change in care in 15 of 3,251 (0.5%) patients or a possible change in care (bilateral cancer vs. unilateral cancer; HGPIN vs. atypical) in 17 (0.5%) patients. In 21 (24%) of the cases, the slides were seen by at least two pathologists prior to consultation at our hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Although the number of prostate biopsies with missed lesions in a consult-based population of prostate biopsies appears relatively high (2.7%), the detection of the missed lesions would have only effected a definite change in care in 0.5% of all patients or a possible change in care in another 0.5% of patients. Our data underestimates missed lesions, as the entire specimen was not submitted for review in 41% of cases. Although our incidence of missed lesions gives some indication as to the magnitude of the problem, it cannot be equated with the risk of missing lesions in unselected cases.     

Significance of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on prostate biopsy

The early diagnosis of prostate cancer has been facilitated by the development of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and evolution in transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate. Over a decade has passed since the initial recommendations for systematic sextant sampling of the prostate to increase the accuracy of cancer detection. Subsequently, variations in the number and location of biopsies have been proposed to maximize prostate cancer detection and obtain more complete information regarding tumor grade, tumor volume, and local stage. Although current biopsy strategies provide a wide sampling of the prostate gland, biopsy histology may not be conclusive for either the presence or absence of adenocarcinoma. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is found in a significant fraction of patients undergoing transrectal prostate biopsies. In this article, we discuss the significance of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and other abnormal histology findings and current evidence addressing the presence of cancer and need for additional prostate biopsies.